People who insist that they hate the Beatles - C or D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (193 of them)
Not liking the Beatles has always seemed to me tantamount to saying, "that stuff, what's it called, ah yes, music, well, it's alright I suppose, it's just well, I can kind of take it or leave it, especially the bits when it gets, you know, really, uhm, musical."

OK, so hating on the Fab Four is not a hanging offence but it's also not something I can relate to really. I couldn't give a stuff about over half the Beatles catalogue but of the stuff they wrote that does strike a chord, I recognise genius when I hear it.

Alex K (Alex K), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:49 (twenty years ago) link

Listening to the electric Anthology 1 version of And I Love Her on repeat till it achieves some kind of maniacal mantra status and you curl up in a little ball rocking back and forth with your eyes squeezed so tight you start seeing shapes works too.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:57 (twenty years ago) link

I am fascinated by this thread and the questions it's raising. I suppose this is because the Beatles are at the root of everything I've ever listened to. They were in my dads collection so were probably the first music i ever repeatedly heard. I went through the whole immersing myself in the music and the mythology for quite a few years with the Lewisohn books and a pile of bootlegs.

It's only been in recent years that I've started to have some perspective and question how good some of the stuff actually is and what my personal opinion on it is disregarding popular critical opinion which i've started to find stifling not just with regards to the Beatles but to all music.

I would say that I love the Beatles, though now i can say that i don't love 'everything' they did which before would have been difficult. I wish I could come to them fresh with no historical perspective to cloud my critical judgement - i wonder then what my reaction would be. Would I enjoy them (or indeed any other band) less without a context to place them in or does this awareness of the history add to the appreciation?

I wouldn't feel embarassed going into HMV and buying the Rachel Stevens album

For the record I would be embaressed to go in and buy the Rachel Stevens record and that's something I need to overcome - I even quite like the single. I am totally hung up on the 'personal cool' thing as Dr. C said. How sad.

mms (mms), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:57 (twenty years ago) link

Is that because you find the whole pro-pop thing so two years ago, mark?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:00 (twenty years ago) link

bottom line: unless the shop assistant/other people in the queue is ahead of the game in this regard, I'd assume that if they were worth impressing, they'd be much more impressed with me bringing Sweet Dreams My L.A. Lover to the counter than something predictable like the Neil Young's On The Beach.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:03 (twenty years ago) link

Indeed, it's just passe now. Of course I have all the S Club 7 records.

mms (mms), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:04 (twenty years ago) link

I think I feel happier about getting into the Beatles now British pop is better than them again.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:08 (twenty years ago) link

I don't know abt recognizing genius, but recognize what I like abt a song when I do! I was TAKEN by "It Won't Be Long" when I was a teenager but still more or less unmoved by the rest of the Beatles thing.

Beatle-haters: C. Even if their reasons are bad it gets at something; it's another lens, even if cloudy, to look at this monolithic thing. (this is kind of an iran-contra position I guess)

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:11 (twenty years ago) link

I'd take the Libertines over the Beatles any day.

Alex K (Alex K), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:12 (twenty years ago) link

The irony here is that this thread has turned into a "you only don't like the Beatles because X, Y, X reason".

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 3 October 2003 15:48 (twenty years ago) link

"the Neil Young". Hahaha.

I think I feel happier about getting into the Beatles now British pop is better than them again.

All of it?

Ally C (Ally C), Friday, 3 October 2003 17:00 (twenty years ago) link

Quite honestly I don't even feel the need to listen to the Beatles CDs/LPs I own, because anytime I wander through a vintage clothing store, they're inevitably playing an oldies station, and in the space of an hour I'll hear 5 Beatles songs.

Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 4 October 2003 02:52 (twenty years ago) link

Many of the pro-Beatles contingent here have stated that they got into The Beatles at an early age, and I think that this might account for much of the "they are HOLY!" sentiment...same here: I got into The Beatles when I was like nine, previously I had NO interest in music whatsoever (except for Disney songs, I guess), but then I saw "Yellow Submarine" and suddenly I realised "hey, music, it's GREAT!" and bought all the Beatles albums and learned nearly every song by heart. Of course back then my tastes were less discerning (or you might say less jaded), so hearing a Beatles album today still makes me think that THIS IS THE GREATEST MUSIC EVER, simply because it sounded so wonderful the first time I heard it all. I'm pretty sure that I'm not alone in this, either: the Beatles do make for a great childhood band, after all (hummable! lyrics about yellow submarines! cartoons!) If I'm right about this, I'd say it explains a lot: not only the deification, but also the agressiveness against hatas (because it feels like they're dissing our fav childhood cartoon.)

The "they never had a bad song!" thing might also tie in here: you're less discriminating about these things when you're still young and besides you only have *one band* that you listen to. There's not a single Beatles song that I don't harbour at least some fondness for, but if I had gotten into, I dunno, The Chemical Brothers or Pulp or Shaggy when I was nine, I'd probably say the same thing about them.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 4 October 2003 13:49 (twenty years ago) link

I got into Spacemen 3 at 13 or so and I kinda hate them now, tho. Actually I was into Spiritualized's first album before I listened to the Beatles, easy.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 5 October 2003 09:49 (twenty years ago) link

i have always been a 95% Beatles-hater, mostly because of Paul McCartney and his insipid lyrics and refusal to write political songs during a politically tumultuous time. Fluff and pap degenerated into "Silly Love Songs" and "Band on the Run" later--shoot me now, in the alley of "no-content".

I like "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" and a lot of John Lennon's stuff, but the Beatles in general, leave me cold. And I'm sick of them, and I hated their stupid screaming girl fans, grabbing their hair and screeching (for God's sake, shut up!). There is other stuff from 1964-65 to 1970 that I find a hell of a lot more interesting.

Your mileage may vary.

Orbit (Orbit), Sunday, 5 October 2003 13:52 (twenty years ago) link

mccartney refused to write political songs?

what should songwriters be writing about nowadays?

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 5 October 2003 13:55 (twenty years ago) link

refusal to write political songs during a politically tumultuous time

This is just silly. You must hate most musicians if you really believe this. (and you don't get much more explicitly political than 'Give Ireland Back To the Irish' anyway).

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 5 October 2003 13:56 (twenty years ago) link

yep. it's a matter of taste.
of course i like some pure fluff, but it is matter of the amount of attention they got and the historical context.

Orbit (Orbit), Sunday, 5 October 2003 14:12 (twenty years ago) link

after hearing "Freedom" I can't understand why anyone would WANT Paul McCartney to sing political songs. Though when hearing Wings, I wonder why anyone would want Paul McCartney to sing period.

I like the Beatles, though not as much from Sgt. Peppers on. I don't really like ANY of their solo work, except the occasional Lennon song (I think Plastic Ono Band is way overrated). My recent Stones discovery has made it hard to get into the Beatles mystique much these days. Though I still love Meet The Beatles, Rubber Soul, Hard Day's Night, and most of Revolver.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 5 October 2003 17:38 (twenty years ago) link

good point. if only we could just make him stop writing silly songs altogether....

Orbit (Orbit), Sunday, 5 October 2003 18:30 (twenty years ago) link

Mark David Chapman to thread.

Herbstmute (Wintermute), Sunday, 5 October 2003 18:47 (twenty years ago) link

I liked the beatles, but that fat/anorexic fuck john lennon was phony

Mark David Chapman (Lord Custos Omicron), Sunday, 5 October 2003 21:22 (twenty years ago) link

one month passes...
Most dud ever. Anybody under the age of 65 who doesn't like The Beatles is a pathetic loser.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 18:24 (twenty years ago) link

geir, don't you ever get tired of being right all the time?

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 20 November 2003 18:30 (twenty years ago) link

Do you?

Does anyone at any given moment think they are wrong about anything?

the pinefox, Thursday, 20 November 2003 20:17 (twenty years ago) link

I like the Beatles but I don't know if I ever need or want to listen to them again.

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 20 November 2003 20:23 (twenty years ago) link

Why oh why did I link to this thread from ILM?

NA (Nick A.), Thursday, 20 November 2003 20:23 (twenty years ago) link

was ist ein beatle?

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 20 November 2003 21:04 (twenty years ago) link

I've been defending Geir previously, suggesting that he takes a lot of stick with grace and politeness, but this sort of arrogant drivel means that's the end of that.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 20 November 2003 21:30 (twenty years ago) link

Classic - providing they give a half-decent musical reason. They're probably the closest thing you'll get to a consensus in modern music
(or anything), but imagine (as JL said) how SERIOUSLY DULL the world + it's music would be if everyone liked them. Or wanted to sound like them. That's why most Britpop was so desperate.

Pete S, Thursday, 20 November 2003 23:03 (twenty years ago) link

the one thing i'm going to regret on my deathbed is that i ever got into britpop. people have committed suicide for less

the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 20 November 2003 23:06 (twenty years ago) link

Good thread, Nick. I get a lot of pleasure and comfort from the Beatles' music; it's been a part of my life for quite some time, and while I don't pull out their records very often, when I do I always enjoy them. In my life at least, I haven't felt completely suffocated by the hype that surrounds them. They really don't get played on the radio that often around here (in Virginia) -- I certainly hear, say, "Flirtin' With Disaster" far more than any Beatles song. Maybe it's different in the UK -- I mean, I'm pretty sure it is. Still, is it really that hard to ignore the hype and stuff? It surprises me that so many people on these boards that I consider to be very individual and willful (in a good way) in their tastes are so seemingly passive when it comes to the Beatles worship that surrounds them (the existence and extent of which I think is overstated and a bit exaggerated anyway).

Regarding another point raised upthread, while I don't believe it's possible, I *do* enjoy at least trying to approach music objectively. Context is not monolithic and inescapable except in a very general sense; we pay attention to aspects of context that we wish to, and ignore others as best we can. It's an oversimplification to say that context is unavoidable -- I mean, yeah, it is, but so what? How does that play out in your actual listening and appreciation?

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Friday, 21 November 2003 06:00 (twenty years ago) link

Also, all you ever hear people go on about is their pop songcraft, but *man* were they good at their instruments. The individual parts in many of their songs are so interesting to listen to on their own; often what sounds strange in isolation works perfectly ("seamlessly" sells it short) within the arrangement. I probably get off on that aspect of their sound as least as much as the songcraft in a general sense.

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Friday, 21 November 2003 06:07 (twenty years ago) link

It seems that a lot of Britpop was like "Beatles, yeah, great songwriters -- classic pop progressions are great!" Yeah, so rip of the chord progressions, except strip them of the instrumental nuances that made them work so well in the first place and play strummy-strum bar (barre?) chords instead! That's what kills me about all the shitty indie-pop CDs that we used to get at my old radio station whose press releases go on about "Beatlesque pop" -- it's like these bands learned all the wrong lessons from them.

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Friday, 21 November 2003 06:11 (twenty years ago) link

Its also a similar thing with the velvet underground.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 21 November 2003 11:37 (twenty years ago) link

Someone said to me, "have you listened to Let it Be naked?". I thought this an odd question, but gave it a go.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Friday, 21 November 2003 12:13 (twenty years ago) link

Julio, I think you're onto something; probably the inverse is the case with the Velvet Underground. "Wow, they like to play the same chord for a while and be kinda noisy, let's do that!" while ignoring the fact that their *songs* are really great on top of everything else going on. But that's not to say that bands aren't allowed to take whatever they damn well please from other bands' sounds. It just seems that sometimes the most salient aspects of a band's sound are only a tiny part of what makes their music "work."

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Friday, 21 November 2003 16:24 (twenty years ago) link

three years pass...

I'm a lifelong fan, and yet I think I'm gradually moving into the hate camp. Although I've continued to claim to like them, I haven't really wanted to put on a Beatles album that much for about five years, and right now Rubber Soul (which used to be my favorite) is playing where I am and it's annoying the shit out of me. They sound like retards.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 22:46 (sixteen years ago) link

they're not as bad as fall out boy

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 22:51 (sixteen years ago) link

listen to side 2 of abbey road really loud

chaki, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 22:54 (sixteen years ago) link

But they are a lot worse than Good Charlotte.

humansuit, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 22:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Sugar We're Going Down Swinging > the weaker songs on Rubber Soul

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I really need to go long stretches of time without hearing the Beatles to appreciate them. They've been way, way too overplayed. And I think that's why I'd tend towards saying that I'm not much of a fan. Because I really do like a lot of the songs that you rarely hear or that aren't particularly iconic ("Only A Northern Song", "Blue Jay Way", "Dig A Pony", etc.).

Except for "Strawberry Fields". I really do love that song, no matter how many times I hear it.

Deric W. Haircare, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 22:59 (sixteen years ago) link

I've never personally known anyone who claimed to HATE the Beatles, though I've known many to be bored or indifferent.

I've only encountered die-hard haters on the internets, and they don't seem like proper people.

Bob Standard, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

we had a drummer once said he hated the Beatles. He also thought U2 had a a great rhythm section. We fired him.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't hate the Beatles, I just don't listen to them.

Jordan, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I can't say I hate them yet, but their cuter stuff irritates the shit out of me now.

Hurting 2, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't listen to them all the time or anything - easy to get overexposed to them and not always in the mood - but man, what really gets me about them is their harmonies. I r a sucker for vocal harmonies.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah. Is beautiful. Then again, I love the Star Club stuff, too.

Bob Standard, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Just for the teenage bashing, I mean.

Bob Standard, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 23:11 (sixteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.