awesome
― kingfish, Monday, 30 November 2009 21:41 (sixteen years ago)
Ryan North is clearly not a great draftsman but his "Season One" Riker is spot on
http://1.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kts5bidlxP1qzfxk0o1_400.jpg
― George Mucus (ledge), Monday, 30 November 2009 22:19 (sixteen years ago)
Yes – that jaw. What a great drawing.
― mascara and ties (Abbott), Monday, 30 November 2009 22:26 (sixteen years ago)
Uhura's the only lonely one iirc
But what about this classic moment:
http://trekmovie.com/wp-content/uploads/nakedtime/sulu_uhrua.jpg
Swashbuckling Sulu: I'll protect you, fair maiden!Uhuru: Sorry...neither!
Best line ever!
― Race Against Rockism (Myonga Vön Bontee), Monday, 30 November 2009 22:41 (sixteen years ago)
What if Star Trek was an ITC production in the mid-70s?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhRGqT31WZg
― Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 3 December 2009 04:07 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=414TmP12WAU
― poster x (ledge), Monday, 21 December 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
Turns out the story about Star Trek showing the first kiss between a black and white actor on American television isn't true after all... Nancy Sinatra had already kissed Sammy Davis Jr. on TV in 1967, a year before "Plato's Stepchildren" aired:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movin%27_With_Nancy
― Tuomas, Monday, 21 December 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think Sammy-Nancy was a "hot" kiss
― Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Monday, 21 December 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)
http://twitter.com/TheRealNimoy/status/12536477742
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 21:52 (sixteen years ago)
LOL
― sonderangerbot, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 21:55 (sixteen years ago)
Crazy Nimoy! Zoe Saldana didn't exist even on a cellular level back then.
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 21:55 (sixteen years ago)
1973 star trek convention:
http://www.youtube.com/user/beyondspock
― Ward Fowler, Saturday, 5 March 2011 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
One-upping that:
http://www.badassdigest.com/2011/05/08/from-the-pre-history-of-fandom-1971-star-trek-fan-film
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 9 May 2011 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
And then of course:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20061024-71.html
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 9 May 2011 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
i can't even believe this question was ever asked. anyone who doesn't like Star Trek, even in a secret way, can fuck off and die.
― it is his "enigmatic signifier" (the table is the table), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
i remember having the trek/wars argument when i was in school and saying star wars. i was so fucking wrong. wrath of khan and search for spock alone > star wars.
― Introducing the Hardline According to (jim in glasgow), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
absolutely.
― it is his "enigmatic signifier" (the table is the table), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
star wars has become such a joyless industry to me
― no slouch of a snipster (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
well so did ST there until the reboot.
― akm, Monday, 9 May 2011 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
Enterprise had its moments, i thought.
― it is his "enigmatic signifier" (the table is the table), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but I could just ignore things like Enterprise (space Bush!) - the OST DVDs were not replaced/scarred with CGI additions, etc.
― no slouch of a snipster (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
right. TNG is still my fave, but that's because i grew up with it.
― it is his "enigmatic signifier" (the table is the table), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
Star Trek just seems like so much more of a flexible and accomodating sort of universe to explore and work with - Star Wars has become so claustrophobic/autistic, always treading over the same water, endlessly filling in and fiddling with details of a single, heavily revered story arc, the self-referentialism is suffocating.
― no slouch of a snipster (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
true. i can't imagine star wars ever getting rebooted with Simon Pegg as Han Solo. Although I would prefer that to the prequel movies.
― akm, Monday, 9 May 2011 21:00 (fifteen years ago)
the OST DVDs were not replaced/scarred with CGI additions, etc
Actually, didn't they do exactly this? I remember Paramount came out with new CGI for the old episodes a couple years ago. Maybe the DVDs have both versions?
― Godzilla vs. Rodan Rodannadanna (The Yellow Kid), Monday, 9 May 2011 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, I've seen the eps with added CGI late night on tv a few times. from what I've seen, it was done fairly tastefully.
the blu-ray discs allow you to pick either version.
― original bgm, Monday, 9 May 2011 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
dig this shot:
http://www.marcwade.com/startrek/remastered/tos-050/planetscape/Ep50_planetscape.jpg
of course, the crummy effects are half the fun, so I opt for my old dvds if I have the option.
― original bgm, Monday, 9 May 2011 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
― it is his "enigmatic signifier" (the table is the table), Monday, 9 May 2011 20:20 (2 hours ago)
^
― zingstreet (latebloomer), Monday, 9 May 2011 22:21 (fifteen years ago)
my point was you can still get the actual aired versions of the OST episodes - they are readily available.
― no slouch of a snipster (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 May 2011 22:40 (fifteen years ago)
we didn't talk about the recent *amazing* film much on here. was there a seperate thread devoted to it?
― piscesx, Monday, 9 May 2011 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
aha Young Kirk n Spock + Lost = new Star Trek movie
God that movie was great.
― piscesx, Monday, 9 May 2011 22:50 (fifteen years ago)
it was good. in order to be great it would have needed a better villain.
― no slouch of a snipster (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:00 (fifteen years ago)
it was better than it had any reason to be. as in, it was like the third or fourth best star trek movie and there are like,, 200 of them.
― akm, Monday, 9 May 2011 23:15 (fifteen years ago)
paramount showed way more respect to the original episodes with those CGI updates than lucas did to his own films -- all the ones i've seen have been tasteful and non-distracting.
any consensus on what the best TNG seasons are? i kind of want to watch it again but don't really want to slog through those early episodes again.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:28 (fifteen years ago)
my favorite stuff is actually fairly early on - the arc with the Federation conspiracy/cosmic earwig infestation, Q's stories. the Data/Lore stuff is pretty good. Seems like reruns are on all the time, but it's always the boring "office in space" type shit. series was definitely on for too long.
― Wrinkles (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:31 (fifteen years ago)
hmm.. i like the first four the best, for the same sorts of reasons.
― it is his "enigmatic signifier" (the table is the table), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:35 (fifteen years ago)
the arc with the Federation conspiracy/cosmic earwig infestation
shit yeah
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:39 (fifteen years ago)
^ should run that every halloween
lol I guess that was only 2 episodes at the end of season 1
― Wrinkles (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:40 (fifteen years ago)
"it was like the third or fourth best star trek movie and there are like,, 200 of them."
if you're going by star trek parody movies that were surprisingly better than most star trek movies, there's lots! Galaxy Quest, Futurama, hm.. well I guess that's it.
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 9 May 2011 23:47 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, so bummed that they never went back to it. strange in that it's the only star trek storyline i know of where you get the idea that the federation is a complex, political and morally questionable organization. stealth smack down on roddenberry's midcentury utopian idealism.
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:48 (fifteen years ago)
x-post there
― normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:49 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, those eps were dope. was also super-disappointed that they never really touched on the conspiracy stuff again.
season 3/4 was the sweet spot for me iirc.
also always have time for the crystalline entity.
― original bgm, Monday, 9 May 2011 23:49 (fifteen years ago)
Seasons 3-5 are TNG at its best IMO. I do agree it went on for too long though - the last season was extremely bland (and often plain bad).
The Conspiracy bugs should definitely have made a comeback, but producers decided not to, simply because fans thought it too icky. The "Section 31" episodes of DS9 did a pretty similar thing for the Federation.
― Duane Barry, Monday, 9 May 2011 23:55 (fifteen years ago)
they did bring the conspiracy back, kind of. the borg were originally supposed to be those space maggots
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 9 May 2011 23:56 (fifteen years ago)
thanks, alan
― always have time for the crystalline entity (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 00:07 (fifteen years ago)
the borg were originally supposed to be those space maggots
that so? missed that. not quite the same thing tho...
― always have time for the crystalline entity (contenderizer), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 00:08 (fifteen years ago)
to be honest I'm glad they didn't go that route. i like bughunting and I like star trek,but I don't think i would like star trek: bughunter very much. it'd be like that timethey turned picard into jack sparrow.
― Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 00:19 (fifteen years ago)
I've never heard about the borg thing either. not really that similar outside of the gross out factor, right?
speaking of trek stuff that didn't get enough play - always hated how the gorn bridge gets mentioned a couple times in "arena" but never actually makes an appearance. give these guys a spinoff imo.
and np, contenderizer.
― original bgm, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 00:27 (fifteen years ago)
this will have to do for now:
http://edpratherart.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/11-gorn-bridge-colored-pencil-on-black-paper2.jpg?w=346&h=450http://edpratherart.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/12-thine-enemy-captain-colored-pencil-on-black-paper1.jpg?w=346&h=450
― original bgm, Tuesday, 10 May 2011 00:29 (fifteen years ago)