The Matrix Reloaded (full spoilers)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (408 of them)
The action scenes were good. That is all.

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 25 May 2003 16:46 (twenty-three years ago)

1. Keanu as Messiah is a bit of a stretch.
2. Yes, some action scenes were good but even poor Jet Li kung fu is better than Keanu kung fu. Lawrence's kung fu is as bad as Dolemite's but not as funny.
3. The clone cluster fuck fight in the final scene in the Matrix skinny hallway was pretty funny. They all seemed to be dancing in a bad way.
4. The blond dreadheads were pretty stoopit!
5. Was Jada Pinkett really necessary?
6. Why wasn't there more Persephone?
7. Where is Rammstein when you need them?

Roman (Roman), Sunday, 25 May 2003 16:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll definitely try to stay away from trailers for the next one: as great as the Burly Brawl (millions of Agent Smiths) was, I can't imagine my reaction if I hadn't seen it's later stages beforehand.

As a film, this was quite good. As the first half of a film, it might well be excellent. As an episode of The Invisibles, it's great.

Trinity says "you give me Neo or we all die right here, right now" to the Merowingian

Well, she says it, and someone else (who may or may not sound like the Merovingian) replies. The actual scenes could be at opposite ends of the movie.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 25 May 2003 19:26 (twenty-three years ago)

Is now when I confess that I didn't think that first one was that shit-hot and I have no plans to see this one?

luna (luna.c), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Not really. I suggest you do that in about eight years or so. Pref. in a thread about the films of Steve McQueen.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:38 (twenty-three years ago)

Right, ok, I'll file that away.

luna (luna.c), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:39 (twenty-three years ago)

1. This movie takes itself WAY too seriously.

Amen. Something the first one seemed to have going for it was that it knew it was a mediocre but cool as shit looking movie (or seemed to).

Trinity dies but Neo saves her! Just like the first one! Neo catches Trinity just as she's about to fall to her death! Just as he saved Morpheus 30 minutes before!

And the fight scenes seemd to trade a lot of martial arts via pulleys and wires for straight cgi. Bad idea.

Also, Cornel West on the Zion Council = CLASSIC!

Ha, I was expecting a theory on why Neo, the savior, is a pastey white boy.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 May 2003 04:10 (twenty-three years ago)

1. This movie takes itself WAY too seriously.

isn't this a requirement of the genre? and isnt it a part of the fun?

ryan (ryan), Monday, 26 May 2003 04:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I needed to go to the toilet so badly during the last 15 minutes or so that I couldn't concentrate and now I can't remember how it ended.

toraneko (toraneko), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:44 (twenty-three years ago)

It didn't. Kinda.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I figured Neo was just playing with the Smiths really.

I would've enjoyed this movie so much more if there had been a scene with fifty outraged Morriseys trying to kick Neo's arse.

(bascially a two hour ILM effects reel)

Again, if only! "poison roxx u r all gay", "hahaha not really" and "oh no!!! FITE! oh no!!!" would have really spiced up the dialogue, plus the architect would have explained rockism to Neo.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I figured Neo was just playing with the Smiths really.

Is it wrong not to always be Keanu?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:54 (twenty-three years ago)

Not it's not wrong. But I must ask, how can someone so young kick so much ass?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Neo actually puts his hands in Trinity's mammary glands!

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:58 (twenty-three years ago)

isn't this a requirement of the genre? and isnt it a part of the fun?

It is, but not when it gets bogged down in trying to explain itself. Did we really need anything about the Council in Zion? That was about as exciting as listening to the Councl in the Phantom Menace talk about their policies on intergalactic trade. The plot is about Neo, leave the "how do they recycle their water on Zion" questions for geeky internet messageboards.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:24 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm so with you there bnw. Sci-fi movies should forever banned from having Councils. you're right in that so much of Reloaded reminded me of the recent Star Wars movies and their relentless focus on tedious behind-the-scenes pseudo-intrigue that I can't imagine anyone caring about

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Neo take a, Neo take a bow
Boot Agents of the Matrix in the crotch dear
And don't go home to Zion
Come out and find the Architect (wer ner wer ner)
Come out and find the ArchiTEEEEEEEEEEECT!

Stranger has happened, they could make a musical out of Silence of the Lambs and...oh.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:29 (twenty-three years ago)

i didnt have a problem with the 'Zion Council' bits and the digression into things like the waterworks...why should it be out of place in this film as opposed to say a period drama about life and love in the time of irrigated hamlets? they're trying to add weight and depth to the mythology they have constructed around Zion etc. and you can be sure they would've been criticised for NOT trying to expand on the Matrix universe by incorporating useful 'trough' moments for reflection - interludes between the full on action scenes. i do think the whole sex/rave scene was a bit overdone and dragged out but at the same time i appreciate that they were most likely doing this to try and really push home the idea of great power being generated by the humans partying and having sex - cliched and Titanic/Ewok Village reminiscent maybe but still useful to a degree.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:48 (twenty-three years ago)

I understand the idea of a nice spectacle and I enjoy a well-made action sequence (I confess to seeing Black Hawk Down twice in the same day) but frankly the increasing use of wires in fight scenes bothers me more than CGI. CGI looks passable-fake - you can tell they're TRYING to make it seamless and as real as possible - but jumping around on wires just looks childish and ridiculous. It's one of the reasons I didn't have a lot of patience for Crouching Tiger..., either.

Top Five reasons I can't hate on this movie:

1. Fighting on top of an 18 wheeler and then crashing it into another 18 wheeler and everything blows up and then the cheesy reaction shot of whatsisface in the ship as Neo rescues them Justice League stylee

2. The idea that the Matrix has people like the Oracle's bodyguard and the french-cursing dude and his wife. The gun with silver bullets and those freaky twins with the butter knives were entertaining, I thought, much more interesting than anybody or anything in the first film (save Hugo).

3. Agent Smith (though he got crapped on in this movie, really. He had the only lines worth remembering from the first installment and this time he doesn't even get to properly explain himself. I do like the idea that he has a manifestation in the 'real world' now. Freaky-deaky.

4. the TV screens showing the alternate reactions of Neo during the Architect blah blah. Proof that the bird is not obsolete.

5. more interesting questions dealing with free will vs. fate etc etc. Much better than the first movie, which was over-obsessed with the idea of the world we live in being fake (LAME unless that was a new concept to you, in which case, I'm very sorry)

Top Five reasons to hate it:

1. Saving Trinity's life inside the Matrix = lame! The flying was okay. The slow-mo endless falling with the bullets etc. was just k-dumb, and they made you watch it like 3 or 4 times. Fucking A.

2. Carrie Ann Moss in black plastic = SO NOT EVEN HOT, dude. Give it a REST.

3. Lawrence Fishburne opening his mouth to say words

4. I didn't have enough hit points when I got to the last Boss and it took me forever to figure out how to beat him, plus I kept getting lost in the Portal, dude, it sucked

5. Sunglasses on everybody is just a little tired. The way the Zionists dress inside the Matrix is completely fucking absurd.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:58 (twenty-three years ago)

it is utter schlock, i watched it last night.

That said I haven't enjoyed a film so much in ages, an action/sci fi film so much in maybe years. Didn't think it took itself seriously.

I mean come on lots of the fighting scenes border on Tom and Jerry style anvil on head ridicule, it must be intentionally ott. The ending was very poor though and a big deflation after that scene on the freeway which was more exhilarating than anything in the first film as far as I'm concerned.

I hate all the cod psychology and the subtle as a knife in the head anti capitalist messages but I suspect the reason people hate this is because they imagine various wankers they know thinking the Matrix is something more than the most bling bling obscene splurge of special effects and kung fu ever.

It is the benchmark as these in the know types tell me, can you ever imagine watching another god awful gun film again. They had been boring for years. The action scenes are usually the ones I'm bored by. Not in this case for once.


(obviously the rave scene was classic)


Finally am I the only one who thinks the next film is going to reveal how Zion too is part of the Matrix yadda yadda.

(is the ps2 game good?)

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:05 (twenty-three years ago)

The ending was very poor though

Would it help if you thought of it as an intermission?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Dude, that movie SUCKED!

Aaron W (Aaron W), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:11 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes Andrew, that's what my co-watcher said and I thought fair point.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:17 (twenty-three years ago)

only one week at number one, interesting

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, I noticed it dropped 60%, which is quite a lot. I think the bad word-of-mouth is really going to kill any "legs" this film mighta had. It opened big (but not THAT big), and the first weekend was really bought. They must've had a HUGE marketing budget for that. Joel Silver must be shitting himself.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:25 (twenty-three years ago)

The ps2 game is better then the sequel in terms of fun (and its still not that great but worth renting.)

the idea of great power being generated by the humans partying and having sex - cliched and Titanic/Ewok Village reminiscent

An Ewok sex/rave scene... we can only dream,

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

it really does look to be this year's phantom menace meaning it'll make a shitload and the fanboys will see it three times but it ain't gonna do what they thought it'd do, but ultimate consensus will be 'well damn, it sucked, huh?'. I've heard enough to know I'm waiting for the dollar theater.

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:31 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think it'll even make as much as Phantom Menace--there'll be less repeat business I think, because my feeling is that the fanboys have really turned against it, maybe even more than they turned against Lucas. I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't the highest-grossing movie this year--which I fer shure thought it was going to be.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:33 (twenty-three years ago)

Doesn't the R-rating pretty much automatically handicap it that way?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:36 (twenty-three years ago)

oh I can guarantee it won't be the highest grossing film of the year

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:37 (twenty-three years ago)

The global, generation-crossing phenomenon that is Daddy Day Care has that all tied up.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:39 (twenty-three years ago)

actually I was thinking Legally Blonde 2 (which has to fight that 'middle part of the trilogy' delimma also)

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:41 (twenty-three years ago)

ha!

Actually I heard LB2 was going to be the Empire Strikes Back of the saga.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:43 (twenty-three years ago)

i wasnt even that huge a Matrix fan, until last Thursday - this second film actually got me more into it than the first one, and in many ways i think its better...but i suppose only in the way Empire is better than A New Hope (i.e. not really, its just because it gets character introductions and plot set-up out of the way and can just get on with excellent actions sequences, some plot development especially the huge twist for the main character that the entire series revolves around etc.)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 17:01 (twenty-three years ago)

my feeling is that the fanboys have really turned against it, maybe even more than they turned against Lucas.

Not possible. I was ready to enroll in the French Foreign Legion and raise a militia after seeing Menace.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 26 May 2003 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)

teeny I kiss you.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 26 May 2003 17:33 (twenty-three years ago)

stevem speaks the truth. I just downloaded all four free episodes of the animated shorts and all of a sudden I give a shit about the series now. I still think the first movie is k-lame, but now the universe is so much more interesting - seriously, I think I may go watch this film a second time, and not just to watch the trucks blow up all over again (I will probably skip out for a pee during the cave-rave, though).

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 18:51 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm def seeing it again, and for what its worth, i think Carrie Anne Moss is pretty hot, leather catsuit or sans leather cat suit

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:05 (twenty-three years ago)

(explodes)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:08 (twenty-three years ago)

this movie fuckin sucked

chaki (chaki), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:11 (twenty-three years ago)

its the greatest suck movie ever

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

On a level with The Hidden if you ask me.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:20 (twenty-three years ago)

If anybody does go again you have to count the number of men & women on the Zion Council and tell us if it adds up to 7 men/16 women as the Architect suggests.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:29 (twenty-three years ago)

i suppose to have had more appeal it would've had to have been more like Blade Runner (but that would be too sombre and obv. it couldnt just revolve around the one character and his monologues) and perhaps induce a lot more eerie tension ala Alien...is that the main problem for the critics? a real lack of suspense and mystery? its not even that relevant that Reeves, Fishburne and others sometime deliver bad lines in a bad way, or that some bits just look soooo CGI (well duh), but if you think of it as live action anime (which it basically is) then isn't it enough for the film to just obey the rules of the anime genre? and would it not be the best example of anime adaptations (seeing as they all seem to be regarded as dud and inferior to their animated originals)?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:31 (twenty-three years ago)

other extremely logical and correct reasons why the film sucks

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:38 (twenty-three years ago)

None of those are good.

jm (jtm), Monday, 26 May 2003 22:55 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm pretty sure its a pisstake...if not then all men should weep

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:12 (twenty-three years ago)

haha I read that and I was really hoping that guy was real. The 49/50 pretty much seal it as a fabrication, though. What a character, though.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:14 (twenty-three years ago)

I saw it again it still kicked ass.
Weird...somehow I don't hate Keanu anymore.
He's actually pretty good now that's he's basically
decided to stop trying to act and intone all the lines
in a "serious" monotone (or maybe that is his idea of
acting), just like you'd _expect_ a cyborg messiah to!

squirl plise (Squirrel_Police), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 02:41 (twenty-three years ago)

ok my 2 cents:

The fighting ie the actual real fistwork was sluggish, but the fites were by and large ok, not boring. HOWEVER the thing that had me laughing, like actually really giddy, was the *bink* sound effect (like little-league aluminum bat sound) when Kino tee'd off on one of the Smiths with the pole ripped out of the ground.

However, I HATE the feeling of hearing a mono/dialogue in a movie and immediately needing to imagine ways in which the ideas could have been said better and more deftly and still sounding like things actual people (or rogue bots or whatev) might say to each other. You can't write a character smarter that you are, and I don't think the bros. Wachowski are all that bright.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 04:15 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.