At 5'10", I'd have to be 128 lbs to be underweight... which actually seems fair to me, slightly high even. The limit on the other end of the 'normal' spectrum might be less fair, yes.
xpost
― Sundar, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:33 (sixteen years ago) link
24.1
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 12 April 2008 01:51 (sixteen years ago) link
23.7
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link
17.6
― Jacob, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:08 (sixteen years ago) link
I am a skinny motherfucker.
22.9 right now...I AM TALL WOMANG
― Abbott, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link
23, i could lose about 10 lbs.
― gershy, Saturday, 12 April 2008 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link
I think mine is around 24, though I haven't weighed myself for ages. It used to be around 20 when I was in my early twenties, but I've gained some weight after that. Which is okay, because I don't think the super-skinny indie look really fits me.
― Tuomas, Saturday, 12 April 2008 14:08 (sixteen years ago) link
23.5. Peaked at 26 fourteen years ago. Never again.
― Mark C, Saturday, 12 April 2008 14:36 (sixteen years ago) link
Also in the 27 range. Hmph.
― Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:06 (sixteen years ago) link
28.9
― Kerm, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:11 (sixteen years ago) link
19
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link
18
who wants a kookie
― warmsherry, Saturday, 12 April 2008 16:46 (sixteen years ago) link
30.6.
Again, bmi is bullshit. The only way I could go back to that level is to return to my 17 year old self, before the half-assed weighttraining and when I was still running cross country my senior year.
BFI is what you should be concerned about.
i like this answer: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080330164202AAgAgME
― kingfish, Saturday, 12 April 2008 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link
well the *best* way to truly gauge this sort of thing is to slice yourself in half and count the fat rings.
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link
about 24.74
― gabbneb, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link
(woo!)
― gabbneb, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link
16.7, which is actually up from a year ago when it would have been 15.3
I am, how you say, less than healthy.
― en i see kay, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:40 (sixteen years ago) link
Y'all are way too skinny. At least me and my fat will float when the sea levels rise
― StanM, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link
19.5 I feel kind of out of shape from winter
― daria-g, Saturday, 12 April 2008 19:59 (sixteen years ago) link
lol @ humungous fatteys bitching about fat gauge telling them they're fat!!!!!
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:03 (sixteen years ago) link
FAT FAT HUGE FAT PEOPLE YOU EAT TOO MUCH LOL
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:04 (sixteen years ago) link
Somebody turn on a fan...
― Kerm, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:13 (sixteen years ago) link
I'm not fat, I'm PHAT.
(which is like Korpulent)
― Oilyrags, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:31 (sixteen years ago) link
23.8. Just under 6.4 but i dtill look skinny, what's a boy to do?
― not_goodwin, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:49 (sixteen years ago) link
still, not dtill :(
― not_goodwin, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:50 (sixteen years ago) link
> i dtill look skinny, what's a boy to do?
I manage by swilling enormous volumes of beer.
― Oilyrags, Saturday, 12 April 2008 20:57 (sixteen years ago) link
just under 24
― gabbneb, Thursday, 12 June 2008 01:13 (fifteen years ago) link
22.
― edwardo, Thursday, 12 June 2008 01:27 (fifteen years ago) link
29... lol fatty.
― miryam, Thursday, 12 June 2008 02:51 (fifteen years ago) link
whatevs
― mookieproof, Thursday, 12 June 2008 02:55 (fifteen years ago) link
I kid, I kid. It's all BS anyways, i was just curious.
― miryam, Thursday, 12 June 2008 02:58 (fifteen years ago) link
24.6
woot!
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 12 June 2008 03:04 (fifteen years ago) link
23.3
― gabbneb, Sunday, 29 June 2008 20:26 (fifteen years ago) link
25.5. Have been very slightly overweight for years, and have failed at losing any weight but gotten to be a pretty good runner.
― Maria, Sunday, 29 June 2008 20:51 (fifteen years ago) link
17.0
It tells me I am underweight, but really, I eat like a pig.
― The Reverend, Monday, 30 June 2008 01:21 (fifteen years ago) link
have a cookie
― electricsound, Monday, 30 June 2008 01:21 (fifteen years ago) link
21.4? wtf? im definitely not normal weight...
― phil-two, Monday, 30 June 2008 02:55 (fifteen years ago) link
ha i got 21.1 again and there is no way im not underweight
― J0rdan S., Monday, 30 June 2008 03:03 (fifteen years ago) link
haha i'm overweight
― electricsound, Monday, 30 June 2008 03:06 (fifteen years ago) link
I had Grom for dinner so the above may no longer apply
― gabbneb, Monday, 30 June 2008 03:23 (fifteen years ago) link
57.8
oh my
― iiiijjjj, Monday, 30 June 2008 12:36 (fifteen years ago) link
22.9
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 16:28 (fifteen years ago) link
Back in the normal range, got a target of 20 by xmas.
― jel --, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link
27.5 wtf
― Just got offed, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:21 (fifteen years ago) link
look at that blubber fly. muscle mass plays havoc with bmi accuracy.
i'm about 19 too, none of that pesky muscle to bother me. i'm sure i was perfectly healthy when i was around the 18 mark, though. but i guess that diet of chocolate and crisps w/ dip has done wonders for me.
― Merdeyeux, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:12 (fifteen years ago) link
18.8
― kenan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:22 (fifteen years ago) link
jesus i need to lose 50 lbs to be 'normal'-
32.3
― quiz show flat-track bully (darraghmac), Tuesday, 23 February 2010 16:48 (fourteen years ago) link
(am joining a gym this week hence the check)
21.2
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 23 February 2010 16:50 (fourteen years ago) link