i dont get why its weird to call the film miami vice? the aesthetic of the movie and the aesthetic of the show seemed pretty similar to me.
― max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
There are better articles than that one on the film, seeing as it has been elevated to the level of masterpiece by the blogosophere.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)
seems like whoever wrote that isn't familiar with the original series at all
― luol deng (am0n), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)
yeah
― max, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)
was thinking maybe piscesx wrote it
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
i think the acting style and dialogue is vastly secondary to how the film was shot, scored, edited, and framed. not a criticism, i just think that mann was trying to make an entire picture of nothing but "michael mann moments" (and trying to get some kind of emotion from what some folks might find to be a cold style and story) and he succeeded. it's like 'gaucho' or something.
― jØrdån (omar little), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
i was actually lookin for the miami vice dvd last week and couldnt find it anywhere, i was suddenly overtaken with the urge to listen to the commentary~
i will say that the score of manhunter was super distracting to me for some reason, normally i dig that kind of crap
not readin that gay article tho
― NEW YORK DESERVED 9-11 (cankles), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
i think the commentary is only available on the director's cut, which isn't as good as the theatrical. shame.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
my man michael mann's manhunter
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
watched this again recently---i think omar's kinda right, in that the acting really is secondary to what mann is trying to do visually/etc., and that's basically OK (then again, i really just intensely disliked colin farrell)
but i dunno, it's too long (would rather watch Heat), and i think Collateral did just as well at capturing that aesthetic (or w/e) and was just a tighter, more enjoyable film in general.
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)
it's funny to say something is too long and then say you'd rather watch heat.
― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:32 (sixteen years ago)
I don't disagree. But that just means, in the overall scheme of things, acting is secondary to other elements of the film. It doesn't mean that the dialogue has to be bad or the acting stiff and flat.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)
aesthetically it was manns best - in other ways it was one of his worst - but it all kinda worked in a purposely non working style - i enjoyed it immensely - especially the flying parts - so much so i saw it 2 times on teh big screen
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
it's funny to say something is too long and then say you'd rather watch heat.― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:32 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:32 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
uh? what i mean is: if i'm gonna watch a long-ass michael mann movie, i'd rather watch Heat
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)
does anyone understand the promise and peril of dv better than mann - no one does - think abt it
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)
also i think i would've enjoyed this MUCH more if i'd seen it in the theater
soderbergh, maybe? xp
i dunno
lol soderbergh doesnt know shit about shit
― NEW YORK DESERVED 9-11 (cankles), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:37 (sixteen years ago)
i fart on him
was gonna say
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)
if u say so! i don't think i've seen a soderbergh movie since traffic (lol), just know that he's really "into" dv
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)
i am not a soderbergh guy really but i thank him for telling clooney he sucked, causing him to vastly improve
― jØrdån (omar little), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)
but it was spielberg who told him to not move his head around so much
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)
also obv i am retarded because i have seen all of the ocean's AND solaris (which i don't really remember thx w3333d)
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:41 (sixteen years ago)
lol out of sight is good - after that naaaaah
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:41 (sixteen years ago)
gotta say tho that i really, really love dv/HD when it's done right
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)
mee too
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)
there were a couple of crazily wonderful scenes in public enemies where i was all wow he just showed me something
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)
public enemies is frustratin for me, there's stuff in it that's as good as anything he's done since heat but idk if i could even watch it again cuz of the scenes where the feds beat up his old lady, 2 hard 2 watch
― NEW YORK DESERVED 9-11 (cankles), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)
yeah that was unpleasant
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:49 (sixteen years ago)
totally missed public enemies
will have to see it over the holidays
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:49 (sixteen years ago)
i dont....really see movies much
i see all of the movies
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)
yeah gbx i knew what you meant but since you left out "if i'm gonna watch a long-ass michael mann movie" it kind of read funny.
― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, November 18, 2009 11:50 AM
i know how do u manage to do that
― luol deng (am0n), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
special goggles
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
more like special *googles* imo
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
that too
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:58 (sixteen years ago)
from sharper image i bet
― luol deng (am0n), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)
i used to just hang around in that store til they made me leave
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
me and my pals brandon and doug
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:01 (sixteen years ago)
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, November 18, 2009 11:36 AM (31 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
not sure he really understands the peril tbh
― Alf, Lord Melmacsyn (s1ocki), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)
but ya i know what u mean about those moments in PE that were just... holy shit. for some reason the guy hanging out the car at the beginning... stayed with me more than anything else in the movie.
― Alf, Lord Melmacsyn (s1ocki), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)
the scene when hes paraded in front of reporters at the airport looked so real or something
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)
wonder if HD makes period costume design harder? like if the picture is super crisp it'll pick up the fact that costumes are costumes and not clothes that ppl have been living in?
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)
def makes makeup/bad skin more challenging
― SMH (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)
oh totally, hadn't considered that
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)
i didn't write that article no. it's starting to get a cult around it though this film. check the imdb for more 'omg this movie is soo under rated wtf' type geek talk.i use geek in a non aggresive way there. seems to be one of those watch-it-many-times-over type movies for people too.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)
Kevin B. Lee hosted roundtable discussion
Keith Uhlich
Ryland Walker Knight
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 23:42 (sixteen years ago)
I don't want to see public enemies again, but I remember finding one or two of the big impact dramatic aria scenes way powerful mostly because of clarifying, unflattering video look. was a wreck by the end.
― caek, Thursday, 19 November 2009 00:18 (sixteen years ago)