another maniacal Armond White review, this time "Fahrenheit 9/11"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2711 of them)
Exploiting the Iraq invasion and American political distress is a form of war profiteering.

Yeah let's just not make any films about it, right? Fucking twat.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Summary of this review: 'I am very annoyed by this film.'
Summary of our response: 'Good.'

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

She cannily keeps her distance from those Al Jazeera employees who wear robes and turbans.

Ha ha christ

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)

As facile as the makers of The Blair Witch Project...

whoa whoa, what??!?!? Armond White thinks The Blair Witch Project was a DOCUMENTARY?!?!@?!@??!! SOOMEBODY PLEASE REVOKE HIS FILM CRITIC'S LICENSE ASAP!!!

(tho I think he's right about Tarentino)

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)

he's also obviously never watched three kings all the way through

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)

It seems as though the film has been pretty effective at pissing off the people that it is meant to piss off. In that sense, it certainly is a success.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Tarentino is being consistent. He's not advocating peace but administering a dose of the old ultraviolence to Bush.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)

What do you lefties think about Godard's quote, "Moore doesn't distinguish between text and image. He doesn't know what he's doing." Agree/Somewhat Agree/Disagree?
I admire Moore's intention of bringing some of these connections, such as that between Bush and the Saudi royal family, to light. I just think he has a very heavy-handed style and his weakness is his completely overt subjectivity; which if he is a documentarist, it should be; otherwise, he is an entertainer, and the movie should not be passed off as fact. My biggest problem with it is that question - what is the intent of the movie, is it entertainment (Ricky Martin anyone?), or news?

The Devil's Triad (calstars), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

"it disgraces that sorrowful date just to inflame liberal guilt."

He really should have replaced "guilt" with "anger".

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I meant he was right about Tarantino in this:

Tarantino, Kathleen Turner and Jerry Schatzberg encourages audiences to think or behave politically. American cinema in the Tarantino years has pandered to violence, racism, greed and self-satisfaction. It's not impossible that the torturers at Abu Ghraib—including even Saddam Hussein's own precedent-setting torturers—were inspired by the torture scene in Reservoir Dogs. QT made sadism hip and sent it 'round the world. Now we're stuck in the middle of a global crisis for which neither he, nor Michael Moore, have an answer.

Tarantino's production company is named after a Godard film but I'll be damned if I can find any Godard in what he does.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

what is the intent of the
movie, is it entertainment (Ricky Martin anyone?), or news?


It's infotainment!

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)

first frag should read: "Tarantino, Kathleen Turner and Jerry Schatzberg [don't encourage] audiences to think or behave politically" since I truncated it.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't follow his writing closely, but my general impression of Armond White is that he's been slowly losing his mind since the mid-eighties -- every column or essay I've ever seen of his has him seriously blowing his gasket over something or other. CONFIRM OR DENY!

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Tarantino's production company is named after a Godard film but I'll be damned if I can find any Godard in what he does.

He's more of a Melville fan by way of Woo. But really, it's all in the snazzy suits.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

White is not wrong in that instance, but it's definitely unfair to lay all of the blame on Tarantino. In fact, by doing this, he's making himself as guilty as Moore by blowing things out of proportion.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Bungled that of course, should read: his weakness is his lack of objectivity, which if he is a documentarist, should be his focus.

The Devil's Triad (calstars), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Momus, did you ever get around to seeing Kill Bill? I would actually love to read a Kill Bill review by you.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Bungled that of course, should read: his weakness is his lack of objectivity, which if he is a documentarist, should be his focus.

This is all brought up on that other Moore thread.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't care of AW doesn't like Tarantino, but to let that dislike turn into saying "he could be responsible for prison torture from the U.S. and the Iraqis" is simplistic, pretentious bullshit from someone who doesn't understand that this sort of crap was going on in the world long before Quentin Tarantino.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

No, Scott, I didn't. I probably will see it one day, though, and if ILX still exists I'll tell you my thoughts.

What do you lefties think about Godard's quote, "Moore doesn't distinguish between text and image. He doesn't know what he's doing." Agree/Somewhat Agree/Disagree?

I think that's probably a fair point. Moore is working in a very different tradition than Godard. Considering he's such a corpulent man, it's interesting that his films don't tend to have a 'body' in the way Godard's do. I hear the editing in 'F9/11' is 'good', but I suspect the people saying that (I think it was some BBC critic covering Cannes) are not people who think Godard's Brechtian editing style is 'good'. It's like criticizing a newspaper op-ed column for not being James Joyce.

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

"As Kevin Costner worried in JFK..." !!!!!!
Priceless. Armond White is a buffoon.

Neb Reyob (Ben Boyer), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Wait wait wait isn't Armond White the guy who creamed his pants about 3000 Miles to Graceland?!?!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:34 (twenty-two years ago)

his weakness is his lack of objectivity, which if he is a documentarist, should be his focus.

Why shouldn't subjectivity and point-of-view be the focus of a documentarist?

Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I dunno, Gear, although Reservoir Dogs does kinda fit in with the Peckinpah legacy, I'd say its depiction of torture doesn't fit any specific trope other than "huh huh this looks cool, esp. with old 1970s tunes." Big difference between that and the opening credits of Wild Bunch (okay I know its insects but THEY'RE STANDING IN FOR PEOPLE).

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Why shouldn't subjectivity and point-of-view be the focus of a documentarist?

Because people are lazy and want to accept the 'truths' that other present for them :)

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

And that's Michael Moore's fault, how?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Right I understand that, but I think he's overstating the film's influence on the regime of Saddam Hussein.

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)

And that's Michael Moore's fault, how?

You may have to ask someone who thinks that it is his fault.

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Al-Jazeera bashing = automatic idiotic review.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Momus I think when a documentarist is reporting on a subject he should leave his bias or his favor at home. I guess we could debate whether the 'documentary' as a medium is inherently supposed to be objective or subjective, but the best ones I've seen ('One Day in September' comes to mind) leave polarizing issues like politics out of the story.

The Devil's Triad (calstars), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)

how could this movie leave politics out of the story?!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)

"if only 'spellbound' stayed away from polarizing issues like spelling"

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)

You are delusional. No movie can possibly be objective (and One Day in September certainly wasn't.) I'd rather have someone be upfront with his biases than pretend they don't exist.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

"why did marcel ophuls have to keep bringing up the nazis in 'the sorrow and the pity'?"

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

for another, perhaps more informed point of view:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2102723/

lovebug starski, Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)

"Why didn't we see more of the witch's POV in The Blair Witch Project?"

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)

The Fog of War had to talk about war, that was what killed it for me

Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)

MAYBE WE SHOULD LET THE GOVERNMENT MAKE ALL OF THE DOCUMENTARIES

deanomgwtf!!!p%3Fmsgid%3D4581997 (deangulberry), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)

hahahaha alex

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't consider Hitchen's particularly sane or well-informed.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

but he did say it was "unfairenheit"!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Has anyone pinpointed the year that Hitchens went off the reservation? Was there ever a time he didn't hate Clinton with a fiery passion?

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Momus I think when a documentarist is reporting on a subject he should leave his bias or his favor at home. I guess we could debate whether the 'documentary' as a medium is inherently supposed to be objective or subjective, but the best ones I've seen ('One Day in September' comes to mind) leave polarizing issues like politics out of the story.

oh no, please don't me bring poor Nanook back into another thread. He's tired.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

You must always remember that people can make movies about whatever they want. And that they can express any point of view that they want. Except in countries where they can't. Well, they CAN in countries where they can't, but they might end up in jail.

Yours truly, Mister Obvious

Mr.Obvious (scott seward), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex in SF I am obviously remembering a different film. I thought 'One Day' at least attempted to be more objective than Moore's work, no?

The Devil's Triad (calstars), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)

But Nanook doesn't really bring anything to the argument. "Nanook staged things and played with the facts" isn't a defense (of Moore's tactics, in these cases) unless there is consensus about Nanook's stature as a documentary, which there isn't.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think a documentary has any particular responsibility to be objective; it isn't a news report.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

"The pitfall for Moore is not subjectivity, but accuracy." to thread

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Nanook brings a history of ahistory, much as milo and amateur!st would like to deny it (?).

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)

where has Moore's accuracy been called into account, milo? Hitchens doesn't count, he's batshit. And the same people harping on Moore's perceived accuracy problem (you, amateur!st) are the same ones harping on Moore's hiring of fact-checkers. You can't have it both ways, unless of course you can.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

he goes after Spielberg like a scorned psychotic ex-lover. talk about a guy whose criticism says everything about him and nil about his subjects...

omar little, Friday, 7 July 2023 18:03 (two years ago)

one month passes...

A fine new entry

Perfect, Robert Davi. A portrait of strength. https://t.co/G5vAwRKGXE

— Armond White (@3xchair) August 25, 2023

fair but so uncool beliefs here (Eric H.), Friday, 25 August 2023 02:24 (two years ago)

So many miniature American tragedies playing out in real time as they fall for that dude, and Armond would be another one if he wasn't already kind of a dickhead.

omar little, Friday, 25 August 2023 02:33 (two years ago)

Tagging catturd2 and, instead, settling for Arm0nd is just one of those moments that make life worth living

fair but so uncool beliefs here (Eric H.), Friday, 25 August 2023 02:37 (two years ago)

Maybe he can compile a special Better-Than list for famous mug shots.

clemenza, Friday, 25 August 2023 02:48 (two years ago)

one month passes...

Unfollowed him on Twitter, finally

50 Best Fellas (Eric H.), Thursday, 28 September 2023 02:47 (two years ago)

two weeks pass...

The teens in TikTok clips who pitifully bounce and sing along with the film’s pre-recorded concert are the flip side of those nerds and sociopaths who lined up for The Dark Knight Rises ...

OK, sure.

... in Aurora, Colo.

oh.

Dwigt Rortugal (Eric H.), Wednesday, 18 October 2023 14:53 (two years ago)

dude is deeply unwell, just an actually mentally ill man ineptly weaponized by the right wing

omar little, Wednesday, 18 October 2023 19:03 (two years ago)

two months pass...

Sharing his "better than" list ONLY because it's now become the most sane thing he does any given year, frankly. (Or closest to sane, anyway.)

John Wick 4 > Oppenheimer

Chad Stahelski climaxed the Keanu Reeves cult franchise with the year’s most visually, kinetically thrilling filmcraft. Movement is the perfect antidote to Christopher Nolan’s no-fun talkathon. Stahelski’s execution of dazzling choreographed combat extended silent-era and movie-musical slapstick — confronting mankind’s capacity for self-defense killing as a sublime moral act. He made antipathetic video-game artifice feel cathartic, unlike a nihilistic pseudo-history. Nolan, as ever, twists national defense into wearying social complexity. Hail the action genre gone nuclear, not pompous.

Rebel Moon > Killers of the Flower Moon

Zack Snyder, Stahelski’s only rival, knows what Godard knew: Myth is how we learn who we are. So Snyder remakes the childish Star Wars series into rousing adult moral lessons, whereas Martin Scorsese succumbs to America’s current self-loathing in his first political film (and first Western)— a bland epic superficially preoccupied with white supremacy. It shows Scorsese learned nothing from John Ford.

All of Us Strangers > Saltburn

Andrew Haigh’s pop-melodrama finds family-based emotion in the erotic awakening of lonely Brit Andrew Scott. Emerald Fennell’s phony analysis of England’s class system attacks the family unit through feminist/sexual transgression. A triumph commemorating Pet Shop Boys sophistication vs. a disaster that perverts a great Pet Shop Boys song.

The Taste of Things > Maestro

Tran Anh Hung’s exquisite re-creation of French culinary dedication practiced by Juliette Binoche and Benoît Magimel. It embarrasses the disingenuous dishonesty of Bradley Cooper’s autograph-hound pseudo-biography that toasts Leonard Bernstein’s political, sexual dissembling as modern virtue.

Winter Boy > May December

Christophe Honoré dares candid semi-autobiography in a coming-of-age story about Paul Kircher’s coming-of–personal responsibility. It bests another dishonest Todd Haynes academic thesis, this time indulging pedophilia as social defiance and artistic audacity.

Asteroid City > Past Lives

Wes Anderson’s sunny, stylized nostalgic adolescent outing recalls America’s natural diversity in the ’50s, back when we believed in social, scientific, and artistic potential. Celine Song’s sad-sack narcissism prefers a tribal, Buddhist excuse for immaturity and social disconnection.

Will-o’-the-Wisp > Barbie

João Pedro Rodrigues interrogates Western art, sex, and politics when Portuguese heir Mauro Costa protests his heritage by becoming a dancing firefighter. This is genuine cultural radicalism, surreal and funny. Unlike Greta Gerwig’s toy-feminism, a marketing coup that sold misandry and ineptitude alongside vapid white privilege — all the more biased in its supporting cast of diversity tokens.

Everything Went Fine > Passages

François Ozon’s broken-family drama in which Sophie Marceau accepts the weirdness of her father André Dussollier as like her own. But Ira Sachs equates queerness with generational selfishness. Healing vs. rupture.

Nobody’s Hero > American Fiction

Alain Guiraudie teases French liberalism when middle-class Jean-Charles Clichet harbors a Muslim terrorist and then falls in love with middle-aged hooker Noémie Lvovksy. Hypocrisy becomes farce whereas Cord Jefferson practices the same racial hypocrisy as the black pathology trend of American lit that he pretends to satirize. Deep vs. shallow.

Full River Red > Origin and Rustin

Zhang Yimou’s visually stunning ode to China’s warrior history is a movie to marvel at and heed. Ava DuVernay extolling Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor’s intellectual research into the global “root causes” of American racism is off-the-charts ludicrous. So is George Wolfe’s inadvertent civil-rights-era comedy Rustin. Strong, artful patriotism vs. Hollywood weakness.

Full Time > The Holdovers

Eric Gravel’s empathy with Laure Calamy’s stressed young mother seeking pride and self-sufficiency teaches something real and non-cliché about working-class identity to indie-movie smarty-pants Alexander Payne.

The Crime Is Mine > Poor Things

François Ozon’s delirious feminist farce captures the inanity of the #MeToo movement. His cinematic and theatrical artifice goes back through the history of sexual duplicity, while art fraud Yorgos Lanthimos defends feminist hypocrisy in his odious sexual horror comedy.

Thanksgiving > Oppenheimer, Killers of the Flower Moon, Barbie

Eli Roth has made the first movie to evoke J6, not shying away from how national chaos was distorted and misunderstood by mainstream corporate media. Brash, hilarious Roth satirizes American self-destruction, leaving Nolan, Scorsese, and Gerwig with moral and ideological blood on their hands.

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2024 16:28 (two years ago)

I agree more than I disagree!

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 5 January 2024 16:29 (two years ago)

All of Us Strangers > Saltburn

I'd say this is not a contrarian take but my Twitter and Letterboxd feeds disagree.

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2024 16:33 (two years ago)

Certainly Nobody's Hero, Everything Went Fine, and Will-o’-the-Wisp deserve more mentions.

Wonder how the NRO crowd will dig the oral sex sequence in Will-o’-the-Wisp.

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 5 January 2024 16:38 (two years ago)

Almost fitting that they'll chase it down with the decapitations of Thanksgiving, really

Wack Snyder (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2024 16:39 (two years ago)

Eli Roth has made the first movie to evoke J6, not shying away from how national chaos was distorted and misunderstood by mainstream corporate media.

if I hold up this sentence in front of a mirror will it make more sense or

poppers fueled buttsex crescendo (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 5 January 2024 16:41 (two years ago)

the closer you were to get to understanding that, the more I'd worry about you

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Friday, 5 January 2024 22:16 (two years ago)

Pairing Asteroid City with Past Lives is so ridiculous, it's intriguing. It's also ridiculous.

clemenza, Friday, 5 January 2024 22:46 (two years ago)

(I won't even get into his valuation of their relative worth.)

clemenza, Friday, 5 January 2024 22:58 (two years ago)

A little disappointed he didn't have Sound of Freedom > Zone of Interest or Chicken Run II or something...

an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 6 January 2024 00:15 (two years ago)

Super Mario Bros. > Occupied City

underwater as a compliment (Eazy), Saturday, 6 January 2024 08:20 (two years ago)

Lady Ballers > Orlando, My Political Biography

Wack Snyder (Eric H.), Saturday, 6 January 2024 15:15 (two years ago)

one year passes...

Putting this here as to not stink up the devoted thread: https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/04/the-cultural-heresy-of-sinners/

But Coogler shows no real understanding of Southern blues culture beyond Smoke and Stack’s facile cynicism: “Blues wasn’t forced on us like religion,” Smoke says. “It’s the magic that we do.” The film’s opening narration about “music so true, it can penetrate the veil between life and death” panders to Millennial segregation. That old “crossroads” mythology about Robert Johnson selling his soul to the devil is replaced by references to West African griots and hostile white devils. It’s critical race theory stuff, a Black Studies curriculum by way of Hollywood. (More on that below.)

And there is!

Lithium Just Madison (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:07 (one year ago)

I'm proud that my two-day-old review anticipated his response

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:29 (one year ago)

four months pass...

He went there.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/09/nashvilles-assassination-theory-revisited/

The news of Kirk’s public death is as wounding as Barbara Jean’s. Kirk’s religious faith and his political performance principles were lived out in how he patiently and good-naturedly dismantled the lies spoon-fed to college-age youth. Even when his debating style was aggressive, it was so in the manner of a teacher who cares. That caring was similar to the expression of shared cultural identity in Barbara Jean’s singing, particularly her trenchant vocalization of “In the Garden” among patients visiting a hospital chapel. It was part of Altman’s extraordinary stained-glass “There Shall Be One Flock” montage showing Americans practicing their faith in different settings and denominations. This sequence predates the diabolism of Millennial Democrats that Altman, an old-school liberal, would find unthinkable; instead, he dramatizes a lone gunman to indicate the sociopathy we live with daily. The perception of blended faith and politics deserves to be called Kirkian.

Lithium Just Madison (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 21 September 2025 00:32 (nine months ago)

James T Kirkian

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 September 2025 00:46 (nine months ago)

Was just thinking the other day that I haven't heard much from or about Armond lately and well, I may not get what I want but I suppose I get what I deserve.

cryptosicko, Sunday, 21 September 2025 00:49 (nine months ago)

I love Nashville so much, I'm inclined to like anything written about it that starts from the same place. Not sure about his hypothesis, partly because I'm not sure what the hypothesis is. But Kenny Fraiser/David Hayward does strike me as a credible pre-internet version of the solitary modern-day assassin.

clemenza, Sunday, 21 September 2025 01:30 (nine months ago)

three months pass...

Better Than!

The movies that saved movies from themselves

Going to the movies last year became one ideological battle after another. It was clear throughout 2025 that movies and media offended our trust under the guise of entertainment content that was often dishonest or dispirited. This year’s Better-Than List opposes that trend and those partisan/seditious lists and critics’ groups that awarded propaganda while pretending to salute art. Film culture reached its nadir immediately after the assassination of Charlie Kirk when, almost by reflex, leftist Hollywood released a particular consensus flick that encouraged racism and political violence. Otherwise, some good, honest art about the human condition awaits your attention.

Twinless > One Battle After Another

James Sweeney’s bromance asserted gender and romantic differences (not diversity) as the basis of our emotional common ground, from grief to friendship and big-L love — the most profound rom-com since Lubitsch’s That Uncertain Feeling. Paul Thomas Anderson’s shallow political farce was the unpopular — but media-favored — flick that mocked unresolved racism and sexism as the justification for civil war.

An Officer and a Spy > It Was Just an Accident

Roman Polanski’s take on the Dreyfus affair finally opened in the U.S. in time to examine rising anti-Jewish bigotry. Jean Dujardin’s commanding performance reveals complex personal integrity without the leaden ironies of Jafar Panahi’s Iranian thriller geared to self-righteous political paranoia.

Song Sung Blue > Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere

Craig Brewer finds the spiritual center of Neil Diamond’s music in the true-life tale of working-class showbiz professionals played by Hugh Jackman and Kate Hudson. It shames the narcissism and phony Americana of Scott Cooper’s biopic about the country’s phoniest rock star.

Nouvelle Vague > Jay Kelly

Richard Linklater redeems his indie banality through sheer inspiration and admiration. The making of Godard’s Breathless gets deeper inside the art of filmmaking than Noah Baumbach’s trite, never-convincing imitation of Fellini’s 8½.

The Phoenician Scheme > Sentimental Value and Sirât

Wes Anderson’s rococo psychological mirth is appropriate for his great-man theory of history — a Wellesian ploy about how the world works that outclasses both Joachim Trier’s art-movie fakery and the overwrought techno display of Oliver Laxe’s globalist nihilism-adventure film.

The Empire > Weapons

Bruno Dumont counters Star Wars juvenilia with an adult eschatological perspective, a heaven-and-earth contrast that is morally piercing and visually amazing, while Zach Cregger taunts social collapse — sex, drugs, schools, parenting — as an occult game.

A Minecraft Movie > Sinners

Jared Hess makes the best-yet video game adaptation, blooming with childhood’s delight. But Ryan Coogler’s childish approach to black American culture — this time as a vampire rampage — insults authentic blues heritage while delighting only Obama-addled libs.

Eat the Night > Marty Supreme

Caroline Poggi and Jonathan Vinel capture the excitement and dread of role-playing by tech-addicted siblings, a perfect contrast to the criminal deception that Josh Safdie celebrates in an ugly biography of a ping-pong champion (Timothée Chalamet) who exploits everyone he encounters. Moral hunger versus moral bankruptcy.

Marcello Mio and The President’s Wife > Hamnet

Catherine Deneuve brings iconic grace to two portraits by, respectively, Christophe Honoré and Léa Domenach of real-life women (herself and Bernadette Chirac) as influential public figures. But Chloe Zhao’s silly, occult biopic of Mrs. Shakespeare fakes female agency merely to steal glory from the dead white male bard.

Auction > When Fall Is Coming > Misericordia

Pascal Bonitzer, François Ozon, and Alain Guiraudie prove it was such a good year for the French (unlike this bad year for Hollywood) that comparing and contrasting three movies about tradition, accountability, and eccentricity measures how a culture understands itself — the essence of filmmaking — on a sliding scale.

Eephus > Train Dreams

Carson Lund laments a season of sports tradition while Clint Bentley mourns a long, wasted life: an authentic melancholic vision versus a pseudo art-flick exercise. Both show the effect of filmmakers unable to shake the trend toward America’s fading identity.

Wild Diamond > If I Had Legs I’d Kick You

Agathe Riedinger’s trenchant portrait of a FOMO-obsessed teen Liane (Malou Khebizi) is more recognizable and universal than Mary Bronstein’s self-pitying almost-comedy about a middle-class American Karen.

Demons at Dawn > The Secret Agent

Julián Hernández expands the rom-com genre to illustrate that Millennial movies lack romance as a consequence of politicized sexuality that twists and defies natural identity. Kleber Mendonça Filho confuses genre tropes to distort Brazil’s guilt-ridden political past.

When Fall Is Coming > Eddington

François Ozon revisits the family secrets of a matriarch (Hélène Vincent) to reveal bonds of love, remorse, and forgiveness. Ari Aster’s parallel horror-flick approach — this time spooking the Covidapocalypse — makes remorse impossible, turning recent political history and panic into a disingenuous mess.

Happy Gilmore 2 > One Battle After Another

Kyle Newacheck directed Adam Sandler’s vision of American harmony-among-many — a golf-farce tournament played against the violent conflict of political adversaries. Sandler’s good humor opposed P.T.A.’s unbearable partisan vengeance.

Dracula > Frankenstein

Radu Jude misses when he targets conservative American politics, but at least his over-amped cultural metaphor recognizes there’s something monstrous afoot in this millennium’s embrace of socialist trauma whereas Guillermo del Toro’s sentimental metaphor for the Munchausen-by-proxy trans movement offers a contradiction in terms. Clever versus Unacceptable.

Lithium Just Madison (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 17 January 2026 00:30 (five months ago)

lol well he’s right that Nouvelle Vague is better than Jay Kelly, but that’s a low bar.

paper plans (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 17 January 2026 00:34 (five months ago)

Had to remember that he hates the partially Sandler-driven Jay Kelly because Baumbach's Mom was mean to him back in the day.

Lithium Just Madison (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 17 January 2026 01:00 (five months ago)

“The Munchausen-by-proxy trans movement,” huh?

cryptosicko, Saturday, 17 January 2026 01:06 (five months ago)

how does a film "distort" Brazil's guilt-ridden past

The Luda of Suburbia (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 17 January 2026 01:11 (five months ago)

I liked Jay Kelly, also Sinners, One Battle After Another, Train Dreams, Weapons, Misericordia, and Eddington, and am looking forward to Hamnet, Marty Supreme,The Secret Agent, If I Had Legs, It Was Just An Accident, and Sentimental Value. I'm not that interested in seeing Nouvelle Vague or most of the others, but these takes just seem bad

Dan S, Saturday, 17 January 2026 01:34 (five months ago)

You liked Jay Kelly?!

The Luda of Suburbia (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 17 January 2026 01:39 (five months ago)

partisan against whom, Armond?

uploading this content requires perseveration (sic), Saturday, 17 January 2026 01:40 (five months ago)

xp

I watched Jay Kelly with a friend who is a George Clooney stan, and he loved it! I'm not a Clooney fan, but we had a great time. It's hard not to like it under those circumstances.

I think it was beautifully photographed, and there were aspects of it that reminded me of Fellini, especially La Dolce Vita and 8 1/2. (I know Fellini films are crossed off the list for most ilxors)

I kind of liked its idea of a solipsistic actor who can't see himself for who he really is, and how other people came to see him more clearly

Dan S, Saturday, 17 January 2026 01:54 (five months ago)

I find White's gadflyism so corny, that even when I agree with him--thought One Battle wildly overrated--it doesn't feel like any kind of validation (too strong a word; it's not like I need my opinions validated) the way it might with a critic I respected. I know that he'll turn his ire on a film I like next year.

clemenza, Saturday, 17 January 2026 02:00 (five months ago)

I know Fellini films are crossed off the list for most ilxors

We don't like Fellini?

cryptosicko, Saturday, 17 January 2026 03:48 (five months ago)

I do like the Bruno Dumont film, it’s wacky.

paper plans (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 17 January 2026 04:13 (five months ago)

Dumont was the first person I thought of when I saw that Artists Dumbing Down and Better For It thread.

gjoon1, Saturday, 17 January 2026 10:21 (five months ago)

three months pass...

Was curious as to whether he'd reviewed The Drama and came across this:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2026/04/the-damage-done-by-all-the-presidents-men/

"Hollywood's worst newspaper movie"--haven't read it yet, but I know I'm going to learn a lot.

clemenza, Tuesday, 5 May 2026 23:26 (one month ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.