Just when you thought it was safe - OK CUPID PART 3: The Return of the WOO!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (11167 of them)

My captain, he is looking for me. High and low. On the seven seas.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/images/bank/programmes_tv/drama/ends/300_jared.jpg

But I've given up looking for him, and am sticking to wasting my time on twitter.

The Paisley (shop) Window Pane (Masonic Boom), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 11:48 (sixteen years ago)

and there is usually beer!

That's what he said! Hey, I was convinced.

I think I might turn IMs off, people are annoying me.

I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)

Wait so did you meet up with him?!

bear say hi to me (ENBB), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)

No no, it's going to be a while. I'm actually kind of too busy til after Thanksgiving, which I know sounds crazy.

I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 14:53 (sixteen years ago)

Oooooooohhhhhhhh. The way you put it yesterday I thought you meant he wanted to go out last night!

bear say hi to me (ENBB), Wednesday, 4 November 2009 14:58 (sixteen years ago)

This website works btw.

― I am not a pervert ... I am an aesthete (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 21:58 (6 days ago) Bookmark

you said it bro

joekin' phoenix (country matters), Monday, 9 November 2009 03:09 (sixteen years ago)

guess who's back

back again

gin & diatonic (sic), Monday, 9 November 2009 04:02 (sixteen years ago)

Suddenly I have all these emails and I'm leaving down for 5 days! Bad timing. But ok because it gives me time to get psyched up to do this right. Usually I worry to death about whether the guy likes me enough and never think about whether I like him. This time, I will be RUTHLESS and HEARTLESS and cut them down like stalks of grain instead of trying to win their approval. That sounds like a good plan, right?

I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 9 November 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)

Whoo go Laurel! You will have too many options not to anyway ;)

Maria, Monday, 9 November 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

Fine line. Trying to be interested in anyone besides the ex because, uh, there's a reason he's "ex," but only his type really appeals. Except, y'know...better.

I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 9 November 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, it's hard to know when you're maybe interested vs. giving someone a chance vs. leading them on, too...I guess that's the point of actual dates, you figure this out, but sometimes it's just more trouble than fun.

Maria, Monday, 9 November 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)

I will summon my inner heartless bitch as soon as I get back from the left coast.

I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 9 November 2009 15:54 (sixteen years ago)

i signed up 4 this over the wkend. eep!
first convo i had w/ someone was abt jodorowsky ! tho, im a little worried that she has no picture

johnny crunch, Monday, 9 November 2009 16:01 (sixteen years ago)

er...ask for email picture? seems a bit awkward but i think it's fair given that it's not just a friends-making site....

am currently attempting to meet people by spending more time at the grad student bar. so far working socially but not romantically, but i figure a) the more friends i have the more friends-of-friends i can meet, and b) the fact that two friends i go with frequently are really hot does NOT HELP.

Maria, Monday, 9 November 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)

Hm well, yes to the "socially" part. Plus, let's face it, while we wd all like to find twoo wuv, ultimately the most stable thing you got is the friends that think you're rad. Cold comfort when you're going home alone and everyone else is paired off, I guess, but more lasting.

I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 9 November 2009 16:13 (sixteen years ago)

and at least half my friends are in long-distance relationships so they're lonely and want to hang out more too. too bad for them, lucky for me.

Maria, Monday, 9 November 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

yea i guess i will if we keep talkin...im ok w/ just a friendly vibe for now

i need more ppl who will go out 2 bars w/ me, preferrably not late on wknights tho

johnny crunch, Monday, 9 November 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)

Late on weeknights is the best time to go out! Happy hour is a douchebag blue-light special almost everywhere and weekends are too busy. But I understand it's not rly convenient if you have a long trip home on a Tuesday.

I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 9 November 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

Definitely but it's hard to get up in the morning when you're out late on weeknights!

Maria, Monday, 9 November 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

I am going to maybe sign up now, now that I have no interest in this "twoo wuv" that Laurel mentions

mh, Tuesday, 10 November 2009 22:12 (sixteen years ago)

Ah, but how wuv can strike when you're just there to test the waters...

My own equivalent of Pato's girl's "it's like we've already been on 20 dates" line was "It's like beginning a relationship halfway through a relationship", which was somewhat lovely to hear. All I need now is for sic to turn up and observe that as we'd only known each other IRL for less than 5 hours before we were hooked up, I'd be out on my arse by dawn.

the juddering triumph of camembert (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 11 November 2009 01:26 (sixteen years ago)

(May I stress that over 350 often lengthy and of course exuberantly-written emails were exchanged over a period of 3-4 months prior to meeting up)

the juddering triumph of camembert (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 11 November 2009 01:27 (sixteen years ago)

guess who's back

back again

zing touch me I'm (sic), Wednesday, 11 November 2009 11:54 (sixteen years ago)

i signed up for this yesterday. :S

a hoy hoy, Wednesday, 11 November 2009 11:57 (sixteen years ago)

found my future wife yall

http://cdn.okcimg.com/php/load_okc_image.php/images/16/150x150/558x800/0x54/379x433/0/16634607336749199939.jpeg

farting irl (cankles), Sunday, 22 November 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)

LOL

johnny crunch, Sunday, 22 November 2009 02:20 (sixteen years ago)

Re-launched self with new pictures, slightly more text and zero enthusiasm. Sloooow so far.

ljubljana, Sunday, 29 November 2009 00:02 (sixteen years ago)

berkeley phd student messages me about whether i know David Wojnarowicz's band, 3 Teens Kill 4. hmmm.

also, yeah, i just relaunched myself on this site, mostly because i am tired of going out and seeing all the same old queens and queers hanging around.

And now my dick is where? Oh, this is too rich (the table is the table), Sunday, 29 November 2009 18:36 (sixteen years ago)

lol ok this works UP TO A POINT

kbp, you may be banned, but you won this one. 'mon the west indies.

102. LJ: British. 5. (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:15 (sixteen years ago)

he's unbanned btw.

sarahel, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:18 (sixteen years ago)

i am possibly developing interest in people i have met in real life, whoa, that is not normal! the question is at what point do i become interested enough to actually DO something about it, which would probably be painless enough, i'm just indecisive.

Maria, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:08 (sixteen years ago)

is there some activity you would like to engage in with these people?

sarahel, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:12 (sixteen years ago)

too many girls on this have chuck palahniuk listed as a fav

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:13 (sixteen years ago)

how many have chuck listed vs. haruki mirakami (sp?) ?

sarahel, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:14 (sixteen years ago)

Hey now, ain't nothing wrong with Haruki Murakami.

★彡☆ ★彡 (ENBB), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:16 (sixteen years ago)

20:1 at least

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:16 (sixteen years ago)

yea i dont mind murakami from what ive read

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:17 (sixteen years ago)

i'm just saying both are popular.

sarahel, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:17 (sixteen years ago)

in america

102. LJ: British. 5. (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:19 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah but not in a way that is really comparable imo.

★彡☆ ★彡 (ENBB), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:20 (sixteen years ago)

it's just harder for me to ignore chuck p being listed than the xmillion who list twilight/harry potter...idk maybe it's irrational

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:20 (sixteen years ago)

all the ones you mentioned are gross

★彡☆ ★彡 (ENBB), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:21 (sixteen years ago)

I'm just thinking about how you would go about conveying your interests or what kind of person you are through a list of things you like that would attract the attention of someone you would want to date. That including popular things besides obscure things might be the way to go, unless shared likes for the obscure stuff is a requirement.

sarahel, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:21 (sixteen years ago)

x-post sry that was mean

(but true)

★彡☆ ★彡 (ENBB), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:22 (sixteen years ago)

xps, mostly because the ones who have a higher match percentage with the intellectual crusader that you are will be more apt to list intellectually crusading material such as chuck p's rather than populist shit?

102. LJ: British. 5. (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:23 (sixteen years ago)

;)

102. LJ: British. 5. (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:23 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, yeah, Murakami and Chucky are different and signify different things, but presumably the people they are looking to attract would read into those as signifying something about these girls' personalities or sensibilities?

sarahel, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:23 (sixteen years ago)

fwiw harry potter would not put me off, twilight would

102. LJ: British. 5. (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:24 (sixteen years ago)

(but not much!)

102. LJ: British. 5. (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)

it would depend on what else the person said about themselves - probably a guy that reads twilight would be more interesting to me than a guy that reads harry potter, though neither have innate appeal for me - neither do murakami or chuck.

sarahel, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 03:26 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.