To be unambiguous, here is my stance (and I think I also said this upthread in the original discussion):
If you have darkened your skin to look like a realistic portrayal of someone of another ethnicity, I do not have a problem with that.
If you have darkened your skin to look like this:
http://www.subvulture.com/archive/white_xmas_al_jolson.jpg
I have a MASSIVE problem with that. THIS is blackface. THIS is what I find offensive.
I understand why people are super-sensitive about any situation where people's skin is darkened because of the whole history of minstrel shows but I really do believe that equating what the cheerleader did, particularly since SHE LOOKED LIKE LIL WAYNE (with tits, lol) with what Al Jolson did is beyond sketchy, because what does making that equivalency say about how you're viewing Lil Wayne?
I mean, has anyone actually SEEN the pictures of the Michael Jackson group in Australia that Harry Connick Jr objected to? They looked like this:
http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/images/hey_hey_blackface_400.jpg
People are taking shit like THAT and equating it with what Tyra Banks did on America's Next Top Model with pasty Irish-looking model Nicole, who normally looks like this:
http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/20090812/300.nicole.antm.cycle13.081209.jpg
... but had a photoshoot where she was styled to look like this:
http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/10/31/alg_next_top_model.jpg
In what universe is the above picture a direct equivalent to this:
http://www.subvulture.com/archive/white_xmas_al_jolson.jpghttp://www.subvulture.com/archive/white_xmas_al_jolson.jpghttp://www.subvulture.com/archive/white_xmas_al_jolson.jpghttp://www.subvulture.com/archive/white_xmas_al_jolson.jpghttp://www.subvulture.com/archive/white_xmas_al_jolson.jpg
I mean seriously, COME THE FUCK ON.
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 14:37 (sixteen years ago)
So, in summation:
Looks like a recognizable human being = ok with meLooks like Al Jolson = fuck you for an eternity you fucking racist cumbubble
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 15:16 (sixteen years ago)
um guys.. somebody wore a KKK outfit in our office costume contest thing on friday!
perhaps it should be noted that the dude is part black but it still managed to be a pretty O_o situation.
― carne asada, Monday, 2 November 2009 16:17 (sixteen years ago)
ha of course that's going to be a o_O situation, that is a wholly inappropriate thing to do at work and a super risky move
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
Looks like a recognizable human being = ok with me― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 15:16 (1 hour ago) Bookmark
What if its supposed to look like a recognisable human being, but I have no idea who that person looks like (lil wayne) or it looks nothing like that person (ronaldinho bottleopener)?
― tomofthenest, Monday, 2 November 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, it didn't go over too well. he's a goofy guy and it just didn’t even seem like he thought it would be a big deal. xp
― carne asada, Monday, 2 November 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)
What if its supposed to look like a recognisable human being, but I have no idea who that person looks like
Does it still look like a human being or does it look like a blackface golliwog? Why is this difficult to understand?
or it looks nothing like that person (ronaldinho bottleopener)
That had its own entirely different set of poor racial connotations that have nothing to do with blackfae, so why are you bringing it up here?
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:32 (sixteen years ago)
lol "blackfae", someone must be done about all of these offensive pictures of elves and fairies in Jolson makeup
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)
Do not talk to me about offensive pictures of fairies, photos of me have been shopped into some gay-ass fairyland bullshit and are FOR SALE ONLINE. There is no blackface involved, but that's about the only thing missing.
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)
links please
― caek, Monday, 2 November 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.camangepasdepain.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/peter_pan_cmpdp.jpg
― TGAAPQ (Mr. Que), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)
that was an awesome xpost
oh wau
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)
so, al jolson is not an acceptable halloween costume then...
― It's-a not so bad (jeff), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)
"Tasteless, stupid, unfunny, lamentable and idiotic. Anyone beat up for same deserves it."
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/YouAreKiddingMe.jpg
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
Come to think of it, someone needs to get to work animating that, STAT.
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)
okay that is awful
― TGAAPQ (Mr. Que), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:56 (sixteen years ago)
omg laurel that's amazing
― bear say hi to me (ENBB), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:56 (sixteen years ago)
They're all really really terrible. And yet somehow for sale? Srsly considering contacting the "artist" about taking them down.
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 2 November 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)
omg
That is... omg
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
I would embrace it and find out if you can get that shit on velvet ASAP tbh.
― bear say hi to me (ENBB), Monday, 2 November 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
I mean it's kind of like "CAFEPRESS/ZAZZLE, HERE I COME" isn't it
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 17:01 (sixteen years ago)
I'm afraid to ask what "Zazzle" is.
Robin Goodfellow and the Gay-Face Realm
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 2 November 2009 17:05 (sixteen years ago)
sheesh
― Nanobots: HOOSTEEND (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 2 November 2009 17:06 (sixteen years ago)
if you dont know what lil wayne looks like you proab;ly didt do anything fun on halloween anyway - no harm no foul
― k3vin k., Monday, 2 November 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.zazzle.com/cr/design/pt-shirt?pd=235969346367166600&get_started_dialog=false&side_front=horz&style=infant_tshirt&color=white&size=18mo&context=lindsey&view=front
also screaming lolz at "Wise Women of the Woods"
― (oh PORRIDGE) (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)
So this Robin Goodfellow obtained some photgraphs of you and used it in his work? He's sort of a Shepard Faerie.
― nickn, Monday, 2 November 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)
still lolling btw
― The Dance at the Crossroads (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:03 (sixteen years ago)
I'm going to shepherd him right off a magical cliff. Is that legal? Does appearing in public open you up to having your image used for commercial purposes?
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)
I think it depends on whether you signed any waivers on claims to your image as part of appearing at the event and whether this guy was taking pictures in an official capacity for the event at it.
― The Dance at the Crossroads (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)
Def didn't approve anything or sign anything. We got paid for our appearance but there was nothing about photographs, and that guy is making $$ off the pics for himself, not for the organization or the event.
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)
So you can force him to take them down and also assert a legal right to a percentage of what he's made so far off of them if I understand copyright law correctly.
― The Dance at the Crossroads (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)
That'll be 25% of ZERO, then, eh?
― I would feel confident if I dated her because I am older than (Laurel), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)
(actually the public appearance part may negate your ability to extort money out of him; I'm really not sure how that all works out because I'm not a lawyer)
― The Dance at the Crossroads (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)
not sure how it applies to 'art' lol but i'm pretty sure i can go take your picture anytime i want and sell it to a newspaper and i don't owe you shit
― how rad bandit (gbx), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)
like if you are at a public event or something
hey so this was my first Halloween in NYC where I did not see anyone dressed in blackface
I saw like a dozen people dressed as T-Pain but all them turned out to be actually black
I walked behind five guys with giant afros and turned around when I passed them, expecting bad news, but they just had on aviator sunglasses and fake mustaches and were being 70s
hooray for NYC downtown Halloween revelers 09 for not doing blackface in my vicinity and also for significantly lowering the percentage of store-bought costumes from the back room of Ricky's that spend the rest of the year being intended for sex games
(btw I'm generally with Dan about recognizable-person vs. blackface but that Wayne cheerleader did look a lot like the kind of thing where if you were in a room with it it would get bad, especially depending on whether/how she acted out the costume)
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)
GROAN @ nickn
― goole, Monday, 2 November 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)
depending on whether/how she acted out the costume)
this is the thing, yeah.
― how rad bandit (gbx), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)
yeah well that kind of gets into my thing of "Lil Wayne does not behave in a manner that anyone should actually emulate" thing, "60 Minutes" interviews aside
― The Dance at the Crossroads (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
actually maybe the main aspect that makes me skeptical is that it would be really easy to be Lil Wayne without doing anything about skin color -- I mean it's Lil Wayne, there are like 50 billion identifying characteristics about the dude's head that supersede "he is black" ... it's not like if you dressed up as a white Lil Wayne people would be all "wait, who are you supposed to be, the guy from Jesus Jones?" that's possibly the bit that makes me wonder.
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
yeah I kind of totally disagree with that, actually; you would get as many guesses for "thugged-out Parappa" as you would Lil Wayne if you remove skin color from the equation
― The Dance at the Crossroads (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)
Laurel, this is kinda interesting, although I suspect most of it is bullshit: http://journal.davidbyrne.com/2006/05/4506_you_belong.html
― caek, Monday, 2 November 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)
Parappa & Jesus Jones...
― we are normal and we want our freedom (Abbott), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)
well that's next year's costume sorted: whiteface parappa
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Monday, 2 November 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)
actually I think the best easy costume I saw this year was a woman of medium skin tone who'd just put on big shorts and painted Mike Tyson's face tattoo around her eye
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Monday, 2 November 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)
I would vote for that costume too because based on your description, she was topless
― The Dance at the Crossroads (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)
also I GISed Weezy to get a picture of him to contrast with Parappa and found the one of him kissing someone who looks like Cee-Lo on the lips
― The Dance at the Crossroads (HI DERE), Monday, 2 November 2009 19:05 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I was chatting to a bunch of people who are going to a thing I'm djing in a couple of weeks, which is 80s fancy dress. One of them was going as michael jackson (unimaginative, yes) and was planning on wearing blackface 'because it's funnier'. Now, leaving aside the sense that of all people jackson requires no blackface, I told him if he did I wouldn't let him in. It was, of course, pointed out that as a dj I couldn't stop people coming in blackface. But I'll find some way of punishing them.
And I think the point isn't Jolson vs Lil Wayne, but that people feel they can't dress up as a black celebrity without without painting their face. They still insist that the defining characteristic of the person is their blackness, not their talent etc.
― dowd, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 00:29 (sixteen years ago)
To be fair, to dress up like someone generally involves treating their appearance as their defining characteristic, rather than acquiring the same talents as them.
― caek, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 00:33 (sixteen years ago)