basically all of the lifestyles pieces there regarding the recession are about upper-middle class or rich people "suffering" somehow.
to be fair (not that that's the overarching purpose of this thread), the art-gallery owner was part of an op-ed page package that also included this, this and this. none of which are necessary revelatory or gripping, but they mostly don't involve upper-middle-class or rich people.
― STRATE IN2 DAKRNESS (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 31 October 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)
His apartment is not “big and lush and grandiose,” he said, “but sometimes you want to have a ridiculous 150 people and a world-class D.J. in your basement.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/realestate/08cov.html
― I DIED, Saturday, 7 November 2009 03:07 (sixteen years ago)
But these days, to afford these sexy-factor places, Mr. Seawood said, bachelors make concessions, either by sacrificing location or by “tag teaming,” as he calls subdividing a space. In previous years, for a $3,500-a-month one-bedroom, “I would have had a few solo guys. Now it’s like, ‘Me and my buddy are going to be here,’ ” he said.
sounds like Mr. Seawood has a rich fantasy life
― dmr, Sunday, 8 November 2009 04:29 (sixteen years ago)
a two-bedroom condominium in a new building in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, for which he paid $3,300 a month.
sentences like this make my head spin.
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 8 November 2009 13:28 (sixteen years ago)
the $500,000 apartment purchase "on a decrepit block in Bushwick" is even more o_0
― dmr, Sunday, 8 November 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
Uneasy lies the head that strolls a baby
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 12 November 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)
Elsewhere:
Part of the appeal, in fact, is in how the clothes relate not to the runways or the estates of Europe, but to America’s heartland in ways that few fashions do. Country and city men alike have rediscovered old-school American brands like Filson, Orvis, L. L. Bean and Duluth Pack.
...wait, L. L. Bean 'rediscovered'?
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 12 November 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)
Three webpages worth.
― bamcquern, Thursday, 12 November 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
the best part about how quickly fashion trends change is that you can write the same article every 9-18 months and still have it be up-to-date
― max, Thursday, 12 November 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)
i always wonder what it must be like to write the least important articles for the newspaper of record. would i care more about writing the crappy content our would i still feel proud of where i did it?
the only luxurious aspect of my bachelor pad is that i don't have to pick up the laundry off the floor every day.
where do they find these people?
― Shh! It's NOT Me!, Thursday, 12 November 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)
guys wanna see the front page washington post style story today?
― jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Thursday, 12 November 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)
the writers at the SF Chronicle must have internal competitions for who can write the puffiest puff piece.
― provates: feminine plural of provato (sarahel), Thursday, 12 November 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/11/AR2009111127404.html?hpid=topnews
― jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Thursday, 12 November 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)
this was front page of the entire newspaper
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/11/AR2009111115683.html
― jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Thursday, 12 November 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)
The culprits could be anywhere -- a crowded train, an SUV on the Beltway
― max, Thursday, 12 November 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)
Naked things. Naked, noisy things, unfettered by the restraints of human anatomy!!!!
― provates: feminine plural of provato (sarahel), Thursday, 12 November 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)
Teenager Writes In Indecipherable Street Slang
― throwbookatface (skygreenleopard), Thursday, 12 November 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)
hippos are pretty fucking important imo.
― ian, Thursday, 12 November 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)
indecipherable
― nice email (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 12 November 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)
"where's my pancakes" is not that hard to understand? dude just wants some eats.
― ian, Thursday, 12 November 2009 21:07 (sixteen years ago)
Nu-Americana has been a big trend for a couple of years now. Hard to imagine it's not on its way out.
― smashing aspirant (milo z), Thursday, 12 November 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)
ilx needs more hippos posting
― jazzgasms (Mr. Que), Thursday, 12 November 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)
I enjoyed it, though, because my lumberjack beard and flannel made me look fashion-forward rather than unkempt.
The Post and the Times both covered this story, about a man accused of robbery whose alibi was a Facebook status update. Both papers though, censored the update itself, which was apparently "indecipherable". Except it wasn't.
The Times story, on The Local blog, opened with this:
Where's my pancakes, read Rodney Bradford's Facebook page, in a message typed on Saturday, Oct. 17, at 11:49 a.m., from a computer in his father's apartment in Harlem.
They admit they paraphrased because the update was written in "indecipherable street slang." The Post, meanwhile, actually ran some of the original update, in its distinctive all-caps:
Prosecutors dropped a robbery charge against Rodney Bradford, 19, after learning his Facebook account status had been updated with the inside joke "WHERE MY IHOP?
A look at the screenshot above however (it's at the bottom, you have to squint) reveals that the real status update was:
ON THE PHONE WITH THIS FAT CHICK… WHERER MY IHOP
I'm no street-slang deciphering expert, but it seems like he was saying he was on the phone to a fat chick and wanted some pancakes.
http://gawker.com/5403874/papers-find-facebook-status-too-risque-to-print
LOL indecipherable street slang
― ice cr?m, Friday, 13 November 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)
pancakes = crack cocaine in street slang
― harbl, Friday, 13 November 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
rly?
― lots of jerks (gbx), Friday, 13 November 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
want pancakes (no crack)
― ice cr?m, Friday, 13 November 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
not rly, sorry
― harbl, Friday, 13 November 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)
3. pancakes 109 up, 75 down
A slang term for crack cocaine and flapjacks
This term started after the episode of Family Guy when Meg inadvertently tricks a social worker into thinking Stewie is addicted to crackSome guy: I gotta score some Pancakes manAnother guy: It's a little late for breakfast don't you think?
― ice cr?m, Friday, 13 November 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
oh haha ˘\(o_º)/˘
― harbl, Friday, 13 November 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
well its slang for crack on one episode of family guy
― ice cr?m, Friday, 13 November 2009 16:31 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/27/nyregion/27doormen.html
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 27 November 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
(Full disclosure: I live in a building on East 74th Street, where I grew up playing ball with the doormen and today often find myself in long chats with them about politics and family. And while the doormen of my childhood sat and listened to the ball game in shirt sleeves, staff members today keep jackets on and stand behind a little wooden lectern.)
???really didn't need this disclosure nytimes reporter
― velko, Friday, 27 November 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)
(just fyi im totally down w/ doormen)
― max, Friday, 27 November 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)
Did you grow up with them in a lectern?
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 27 November 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)
Also, great headline
hahaxp
― Danny Duberstein (hmmmm), Friday, 27 November 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)
there's a good article or five to be written about doormen but that ain't it
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 27 November 2009 21:38 (sixteen years ago)
One need not look further than the lobby of Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino, Calif., to see that the iPhone and applications that run on it are centerpieces of the company’s mobile strategy.
Fascinating! Tell me more!
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/technology/06apps.html?em
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Sunday, 6 December 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/12/04/ST2009120402037.html?sid=ST2009120402037
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Sunday, 6 December 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)
Hey now, we have another thread for that!
quiddities and agonies of the ruling class, DC edition - a rolling washington post thread
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 6 December 2009 23:37 (sixteen years ago)
oh ha didn't kno
― crazy farting throwback jersey (gbx), Sunday, 6 December 2009 23:38 (sixteen years ago)
o man the post is just like *smh*
― ice cr?m, Monday, 7 December 2009 01:53 (sixteen years ago)
the only reason i can think of for this not being on this thread yet is that nobody could bring themselves to read it. (i made it onto the second page, just barely...)
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)
lol i thought about posting that but was like, can i in good conscience post an article i can't even read through myself :)
― harbl, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:18 (sixteen years ago)
i'm embarrassed i even read that much of it.
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:20 (sixteen years ago)
i mean i know i have defended the new york times on this thread but SOMETIMES THEY MAKE IT HARD.
(that is not a reference to any sexual details that may or may not be in that article, and if there are sexual details in that article, i don't want to know.)
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:21 (sixteen years ago)
I couldn't even be bothered to start it. Summarize it in the most nauseating way possible.
― Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:23 (sixteen years ago)
i can summarize the first page:
hi me and my husband are smart, attractive people (did i mention he's on a fitness program to give himself the body of a Marine?) with interesting backgrounds who got married because we were madly in love and now we have two lovely children and a house we renovated ourselves with money from a book advance and we're both successful writers so what with being fabulously happy and successful and all i thought i should write a memoir about trying to make our already-really-swell marriage EVEN MORE FANTASTIC by REALLY THINKING about what kind of relationship we really want to have and being really honest and open with each other. and now i'm going to spend 4,000 words telling you the candid details. (if you like it, you can buy my book!)
― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:26 (sixteen years ago)
top of page 10
The following weekend: jealousy again (or was it an attempt to fuel our eroticism with tension?). I said yes a bit too forcefully when Dan asked if I’d noticed a well-muscled young man at the pool. Dan was allowing for my sexual free agency, granting me my full humanity. We lived, raised children, worked and slept together. Now we needed to gouge out a gap to bridge, an erotic synapse to cross. It was exhausting. “That guy did the epitome of bad-values hypertrophy training” — vanity weight lifting, in Dan’s estimation, just to get buff. “You’re like a guy admitting he likes fake boobs. And he had chicken legs. Did you notice that, too?”
― omar little, Tuesday, 8 December 2009 02:28 (sixteen years ago)