thanks for mentioning those brookings stooges. saw both of them on various shows/in various articles talking about how great iraq is doing, i've only noticed crooks and liars talking about how full of crap they are.
wikipedia says the brookings institution is traditionally considered liberal. unh?
― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Sunday, 5 August 2007 07:05 (eighteen years ago)
they were, not so much anymore
― kingfish, Sunday, 5 August 2007 08:24 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.creators.com/comics/37/8405_thumb.gif
http://www.creators.com/comics/37/8406_thumb.gif
http://www.creators.com/comics/37/8408_thumb.gif
such odd representations of teef
― kingfish, Monday, 6 August 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.creators.com/comics/37/8409_thumb.gif
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/strips/mallard/2000/MFT20070804.jpg
― kingfish, Monday, 6 August 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)
sanctimony powered go cart? way to steal jokes from the simpsons, you creative genius, you.
― kenan, Monday, 6 August 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
re: thickening arctic ice
http://www.planetwater.ca/research/sea-ice/IceD.gif
― kenan, Monday, 6 August 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
when the history of this age is written, I hope that attention is paid to the tribal epistemology and completely unconscious adoption of postmodern relativism by those who spent decades decrying it.
― kingfish, Monday, 6 August 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/080607.jpg
I'm confused - things are going so well the Iraqis are kissing our asses... or the damn dirty lib'ruls have so constrained our troops so they're forced to "kiss <towelhead> ass"?
― milo z, Monday, 6 August 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)
kind of amazing how she keeps up the naughty hipster librarian look even in body armor
― milo z, Monday, 6 August 2007 19:06 (eighteen years ago)
otherwise mr. muir would not be able to yank it to that cartoon
― kenan, Monday, 6 August 2007 19:23 (eighteen years ago)
haha stolen from ed begley jr. himself! not to mention that episode was like 8 years ago.
― tremendoid, Monday, 6 August 2007 19:26 (eighteen years ago)
It does not surprise me that the duck completely misrepresented/misunderstood the new information on gray whales.
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Monday, 6 August 2007 19:37 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.creators.com/comics/37/8405_thumb.gifhttp://files.blog-city.com/files/M05/127853/p/f/bush_thumbs_up.jpg
― gr8080, Monday, 6 August 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.patriotart.com/images/08_06_07/EightPM450.jp The countdown to cancellation continues...
Again, it's the impotent nashing of teeth against the dirty fucking hippies I find hilarious. That this guy has it to the point of delusion is even better. Sure, why not take out your angst of the collapsing of your heroes thru your colored pencil scribblings? Go ahead and deny the results of Neilsen ratings for the last coupla years if it makes ya feel better.
http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/080707.jpg
Again, is Muir going on as if this is way things are, or the way it should be? Or, again, is it a bit of self-delusion where the guy is trying to reinforce his delusion thru his scribblings? Hell, there's plenty of great guys over there doing great things, but there's also a lot of guys put thru the wringer and not doing such nice things.
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/bg0807j.jpg
wokka wokka
― kingfish, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)
obama looked better as a broad racist stereotype. wtf is that caricature?
― kenan, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
shit, we're missing the first cartoon:
http://www.patriotart.com/images/08_06_07/EightPM450.jpg
or the current art on http://www.patriotart.com right now
― kingfish, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:06 (eighteen years ago)
whoah
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)
why is tommy thompson walking martin scorsese? that's so abstract.
― kenan, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
dada rightwing cartoonists
Isn't Olb getting like the second-highest ratings on prime-time cable news?
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)
appears not
FOX___ THE OREILLY FACTOR________________ 375 FOX___ HANNITY & COLMES__________________ 362 FOX___ ON THE RECORD W/GRETA_____________ 351 FOX___ FOX AND FRIENDS___________________ 318 FOX___ THE OREILLY FACTOR (RPT)__________ 303 FOX___ THE FOX REPORT W/S.SMITH__________ 292 FOX___ AMERICAS NEWSROOM_________________ 279 FOX___ SPECIAL REPORTW/BRIT HUME_________ 263 CNN___ LARRY KING LIVE___________________ 252 FOX___ LIVE DESK W/M.MACCALLUM___________ 235 FOX___ FOX NEWS LIVE_____________________ 224 FOX___ FOX & FRIENDS FIRST_______________ 223 MSNBC_ MSNBC INVESTIGATES (RPT)__________ 215 FOX___ STUDIO B W/S.SMITH________________ 209 MSNBC_ MSNBC REPORTS (RPT)_______________ 207 CNN___ ANDERSON COOPER 360_______________ 205 FOX___ THE BIG STORY W/J GIBSON__________ 204 CNN___ LOU DOBBS TONIGHT_________________ 203 FOX___ YOUR WORLD W/NEIL CAVUTO__________ 198 MSNBC_ COUNTDOWN W/ K. OLBERMANN_________ 185
avgs for july
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:44 (eighteen years ago)
CABLE NEWS: RELEVANT
durrr
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)
this stems from old news, olbermann put o'reilly on the "worst person in the world" list about 500 separate times for being a liar and a shill, and o'reilly's only response, ever, has been to 1. threaten some radio call-in dork with criminal charges and police action for SAYING "KEITH OLBERMANN" on o'reilly's show; 2. talk about how much better his ratings are than olbermann's.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 19:50 (eighteen years ago)
http://newsbusters.org/gaggle/2007-08-07.png
haha, rich media newsreaders are happy when their 401Ks tank. All libruls are!
http://newsbusters.org/gaggle/2007-08-06.png
― kingfish, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 22:23 (eighteen years ago)
Uh, doesn't the NYT keep publishing Michael Gordon's "My super secret sources in the military tell me that Iran has cooties..." pieces on the front page?
― mulla atari, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 23:13 (eighteen years ago)
yup. not to mention a coupla years of Judith miller, or the folks on the op-ed pages.
― kingfish, Tuesday, 7 August 2007 23:17 (eighteen years ago)
didn't the NYT basically con everyone into believing the 'intelligence' on iraq and get us into that fucking war? isn't the NYT the paper than recently ran that brookings instution shite-piece ("a war we just might win") about how we just another six months/year/six years/century in iraw to make it work?
soooooooo fuckin liberal.
― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 01:32 (eighteen years ago)
iraw, iraq, if it starts with ira- we'll bomb it.
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/07.08.07.PennPal.jpg
Oh no, not sean penn! also, haw haws to hammer & sickle bedcover
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/ca0808ad.jpg
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/ca0808bd.jpg
what, couldn't run the "fishing expedition" strip again?
― kingfish, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/ca0808dd.jpg
jesus fucking christ
― kingfish, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
"can't government engineers and bureaucrats do anything right do their jobs for free?"
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 19:45 (eighteen years ago)
What the fuck. As if it isn't within the government's purview to upkeep roads. Yes, let's privatize road building and upkeep. That will certainly go very smoothly.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)
dood didn't you hear those privately run schools and prisons are kicking ass
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)
aha, if I go back a couple of days that earlier one makes complete sense - clearly we need Iraqi tort reform.
http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/080507.jpg
― milo z, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)
PLEASE MOVE UR ASS AWAY FROM THE CAMERA
i stepped away from this thread for two weeks and am just agog at the cavalcades of LAFFS
― forksclovetofu, Wednesday, 8 August 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
Jesus, the first panel of that Obama one, with the gun in the holster labeled IRAQ . . . I mean, you need a team of PhDs just to unpack the bullshit in these peoples' worldview.
― Phil D., Wednesday, 8 August 2007 23:03 (eighteen years ago)
Hey, Chuck Asay, here's a big fuck you from Minneapolis.
― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Thursday, 9 August 2007 01:08 (eighteen years ago)
Even in androgynous body army, still shines through the Mad Ass For Days.
― Abbott, Thursday, 9 August 2007 01:09 (eighteen years ago)
Chuck Asay is easily the worst of this lot.
― gr8080, Thursday, 9 August 2007 01:57 (eighteen years ago)
pls to explain what this means
― Maria :D, Thursday, 9 August 2007 05:42 (eighteen years ago)
what i mean is that modern american politics is tribal(blue state/red state bullshit, for example), and there are plenty of people who have had the "media is biased, and therefore untrustworthy and to be discarded" thing drilled into their heads that they can only believe certain media outlets that agree with what the Party is putting out.
the postmodern relativism bit refers to people only believing in things in certain people report them. Stephen Colbert understands this better than almost everybody else nowadays(check his interview with the Onion). It's the attack of "objective media" by people who would happily replace fact with opinion, which, as guys like Chris Hedges write, is a big step towards American Fascism.
But more later, when i've sobered up.
― kingfish, Thursday, 9 August 2007 07:10 (eighteen years ago)
http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/images/2007_07_09_Wheel_Of_Misfortune.jpg
― humansuit, Thursday, 9 August 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)
I think you're pretty articulate drunk actually.
http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/080907.jpg
haha, don't you see?! all it takes for one of those bleeding-heart terrorsymp whore/media-type to come around to the 28% way of thinking is to actually go there and see all the schools we're painting! It's as plain as day! And we must viciously attack anyone who says otherwise, be they a soldier or not.
http://www.faithmouse.com/aclu106reg.jpg
― kingfish, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
OMG I would so hang that portrait in my house.
― Abbott, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:48 (eighteen years ago)
I would want the word bubble protruding over the frame & everything. It's fantastic.
― Abbott, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
I love the hair through the halo
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:50 (eighteen years ago)
re: Postmodernism in Batshitistan. Where I see this is when radio/tv hosts keep pushing a discredited meme with the knowledge that their audience is unlikely to know or care that it has been discredited. Hannity is particularly bad.
Also, there's a strange focusing on one particular irrelevant detail to represent the whole--Global Warming can't be true because Al Gore has a high electricity bill. The O'Reilly campaign against YearlyKos is an example of this: pulling a few comments from a site with hundreds of thousands of contributers to tarnish the entire net roots.
I think a lot of the consumers of this stuff realize that the tactics used are underhanded, but believe that since their perspective is more morally pristine than the enemy's, it's okay to get their hands dirty. Hence them going insane over Dan Rather and not giving a flying f about Jeff Gannon (or Abu Ghraib--which was just a frat party!)
― mulla atari, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:36 (eighteen years ago)
I figured that the batshitters knew that they were using a form of postmodernism - in fact, that they did it on purpose. If you can see a weakness in your "enemy", then you can exploit it, and the conflation of certain sorts of academia/media/leftism can give you a lot of extra leeway.
― emil.y, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)
Part of the pomo bit i'm talking about is best described by Stephen Colbert, and perfectly encaptured by "truthiness":
...We weren't thrilled with Bush because we thought he was a good guy at that point, we were thrilled with him because we thought that he probably had hired people who would fuck up our enemies, regardless of how they had to do it. That was for us a very good thing, and I can't argue with the validity of that feeling.But that has been extended to the idea that authoritarian is better than authority. Because authoritarian means there's only one authority, and that authority has got to be the President, has got to be the government, and has got to be his allies. What the right-wing in the United States tries to do is undermine the press. They call the press "liberal," they call the press "biased," not necessarily because it is or because they have problems with the facts of the left—or even because of the bias for the left, because it's hard not to be biased in some way, everyone is always going to enter their editorial opinion—but because a press that has validity is a press that has authority. And as soon as there's any authority to what the press says, you question the authority of the government—it's like the existence of another authority. So that's another part of truthiness. Truthiness is "What I say is right, and nothing anyone else says could possibly be true." It's not only that I feel it to be true, but that I feel it to be true. There's not only an emotional quality, but there's a selfish quality.
But that has been extended to the idea that authoritarian is better than authority. Because authoritarian means there's only one authority, and that authority has got to be the President, has got to be the government, and has got to be his allies. What the right-wing in the United States tries to do is undermine the press. They call the press "liberal," they call the press "biased," not necessarily because it is or because they have problems with the facts of the left—or even because of the bias for the left, because it's hard not to be biased in some way, everyone is always going to enter their editorial opinion—but because a press that has validity is a press that has authority. And as soon as there's any authority to what the press says, you question the authority of the government—it's like the existence of another authority. So that's another part of truthiness. Truthiness is "What I say is right, and nothing anyone else says could possibly be true." It's not only that I feel it to be true, but that I feel it to be true. There's not only an emotional quality, but there's a selfish quality.
It's the authoritarian aspect I'm talking about, where one of the side effects is to dispute the authoritative. In other words, if you know your shit, you can call others on their's. And rightwing authoritarian types can't have that. Because your mindset is completely dependent on the big tough daddy who sets the rules and knows best, and NOTHING can question that, because it is in the questioning that the possibility of error or that daddy might not be completely right, and the RWA mindset is (deliberately) stunted enough not to be able to handle that variance, or any shading.
So b/c the RWA thing so needs the unquestioned authority, it will attack anyone or anything that could possibly have a valid standing. You attack those climate scientists who are disagreeing with what daddy and his Party had decried, and then you attack science itself. You try to weaken science by bringing in religion, and teaching not-science along with science. That's one of the problems of the home-school/creationist/ID thing, a deliberate attempt(read "The Wedge Document", this shit really is planned out) to attack any authority that can contest Daddy.
― kingfish, Thursday, 9 August 2007 23:22 (eighteen years ago)