― jel, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― anthony, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Richard Tunnicliffe, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jonnie, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sam, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sarah, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Emma, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Disco Dave, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Geoff, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
***Hence off-spin and leg-spin (also off-break and leg-break), which bounce on the respective side of the batsman***.
It doesn't make any difference where they bounce - it's the direction the ball goes AFTER it has bounced which gives rise to the terms off- spin and leg-spin.
**Swing = when fast bowler spins the ball hard and it moves in the air***
The bowler doesn't SPIN it. Instead the seam is placed so that it is pointing to slip (out-swing) or fine-leg (in-swing). The best chance of getting swing is to use the fingers and wrist to keep the seam in that position when it goes thru the air. (It may move off the pitch in the same direction if the seam hits). The bowler can also influence this by the position of the front foot and by sweeping the bowling hand down the correct side of the body AFTER the ball has gone. If the seam wobbles in the air, you've less chance of knowing which way, and how much it will move (both in the air and off the pitch).
Reverse swing is when you go for outswing, but at the last minute the ball darts in towards leg after 'shaping' to go off-side. I've get to see a convincing explanation of HOW it's done, but it's a bastard to play!
― Dr. C, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 28 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
To get around to the answer, Tracer, most bowlers do not get any appreciable swing - even if they follow the textbook. There seems to be something about swing bowlers actions which is not entirely coachable, whereas most people can get some movement off the pitch (seam-bowlng).
Occasionally even the best swing bowlers findthey can't control the amount of swing and get TOO MUCH movement so that the batsman doesn't need to play the ball.
If you really wnat to get wierd about bowling we can talk about leg- spin, where the top bowlers have several viciousl spinning deliveries which are bowled with slightly different actions. Some spin one way, some the other, some keep low, some go straight on and some are bowled with lots of disguise to look like one of the other deliveries. It's bluff and double-bluff.
― anthony, Saturday, 29 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
It is an almost magical combination of the use of rare skill and athleticism, aerodynamics, and exploiting natural phenomena.
It requires humidity to create a more dense air mass, and for the ball to be buffed to a shine ON ONE SIDE OF THE SEAM ONLY.
When the ball is bowled with the upright seam and the extra spin along the axis through the seam imparted by the bowler's index and middle fingers along it, with a smooth,shiny ball face one side and an unrestored mucky one that creates more friction, for the same reasons planes fly, the ball swings to one side in the thicker air.
It usually also dips sharply, sometimes VERY sharply, and the extra energy this generates gives it tremendous bounce off the pitch, while the combination of the seam hitting the pitch, at an angle created by the bowler, affected by the other forces such as rate of spin, can make that bounce extremely variable in height and direction.
The bowler's action, and precise preparation of one side of the ball, without tampering, and the required air density, are the keys, and it's awesome to watch!
Glen McGrath, Brett Lee and Jason Gillespie are the best exponents of the art.
Cricket - Ballet and War, with Bats and Balls! ...lol
Greetings fellow posters. Nice to see so many erudite, informed individuals.
The US also has hundreds of cricket teams, and must surely be on the verge of entering a team in even a one-day match? That would be great.
Today in OZ I predict the Aussie batsmen will be smashing the world record for a final innings to defeat New Zealand...their form says they'll do it, but either way it will be FUN!!!!!!!!
Thanks for sharing an interest in cricket.
― Brett Fielding, Monday, 3 December 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 24 May 2003 14:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 24 May 2003 14:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Saturday, 24 May 2003 16:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― chris (chris), Saturday, 24 May 2003 19:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― darren (darren), Sunday, 25 May 2003 12:35 (twenty-three years ago)
No, I'm not complaining. But the conditions would have been perfect for him on the first couple of days. It's a shame, he's almost 29 and for reasons of family pride I want him to get a decent stab at it.
― Mark C (Mark C), Sunday, 25 May 2003 15:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 25 May 2003 15:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Sunday, 25 May 2003 16:40 (twenty-three years ago)
of course, the cute new zealand bowler made watching like 10 hours of cricket so much more interesting:http://www.rediff.com/cricket/2002/sep/23vet.jpg
― phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 22 September 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Dada), Friday, 22 September 2006 15:31 (nineteen years ago)
1) Notts failed to get more than ONE bonus point from their game2) Yorkshire and Durham drew3) Durham got maximum batting points.
Astonishingly, 1) and 3) have already come true, and 2) looks to be very much on the cards barring an absolute mare for Durham tomorrow.
Notts would have got the 2 bonus points by taking 7 or more Sussex wickets inside 130 overs, an occurrence which happens in almost every single Championship game. With an abysmal bowling display, they took just 6, accruing one point.
Notts would then have got the 1 further point they needed by scoring only 200 runs in their own first innings. Sussex had scored 550-odd for 6, so the pitch would seem to have been ideally suited to this.
They crumbled from 130-2 to 165 all out.
One of the biggest chokes in recent British sporting history?
(P.S. I'm a Worcs fan)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 22 September 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
anyone following the test in hamilton?
― whatever, Saturday, 8 March 2008 22:36 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, thought so.
― whatever, Saturday, 8 March 2008 23:11 (eighteen years ago)
me, but its a bit of a foregone conclusion now innit
― Herman G. Neuname, Saturday, 8 March 2008 23:18 (eighteen years ago)
just looked at the scorecard at lunch. 36/4 from 18 overs. the scores of cook and vaughan total 22 runs from 33 balls, which means the rest of the sorry crew have made 12 runs from just under 13 overs. A run an over???
fraser's comments are spot on: england would never have declared as vettori did. they'd have waited until about 3 balls before tea, just in case mccullum hit 50 sixes in a row.
― whatever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:02 (eighteen years ago)
Do colly and bell have the bottle to survive? Better in this situation than KP and co but that doesn't mean anything.
― Herman G. Neuname, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:09 (eighteen years ago)
they'll survive for the best part of an hour or so, in the english way. i'd be very surprised if the match goes into the final session, once the spinners get into their ribs and there are 4 or 5 around the bat.
funny how these things cycle. england outclassed at rugby today, being outclassed at cricket in a country where they probably expected to win, and going through transition in football. contrast to a few years ago: rugby world cup holders, ashes winners, rooney breaking into the england team...
― whatever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:12 (eighteen years ago)
Well, as a scotsman I enjoyed the rugby at least :) The cricket was sadly more predictable.
― Herman G. Neuname, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:20 (eighteen years ago)
As a working class Englishman living oop North I enjoyed the rugby.
― Noodle Vague, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:21 (eighteen years ago)
You enjoy England getting beat at anything, Jim.
― Herman G. Neuname, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:23 (eighteen years ago)
Nah, the cricket is painful. But they've lost the plot big time, and I'm not a fan of Vaughan nowadays.
― Noodle Vague, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:25 (eighteen years ago)
explain the class ref?
― whatever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:30 (eighteen years ago)
as in, how it is important in terms of the sport?
in the meantime, collingwood: 0 runs, 30 balls. should be zero balls, no fkg fight.
― whatever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:32 (eighteen years ago)
I don't care for Rugby Union cos I've too many hoorays are into it. In fact Guscott came out with a classic bit of twattery midweek when they dropped that dude for going clubbing - he said something along the lines of that behaviour not being good enough for Rugby players, but you'd expect it of footballers. Cock.
― Noodle Vague, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:36 (eighteen years ago)
"cos I've known too many hoorays who are into it", I mean.
fairdos. i'm not a hooray, or a northerner (altho i live in mcr), but i like both codes but prefer union. i think i like contested scrums more than uncontested. but i like the rigidity of fixed numbers of tackles in league, although that leads to a sterility in terms of lack of depth of player size/beef/athleticism. league is homogenised rugby, union still has the cream separated at the top of the bottle.
just getting at: why is rugby cursed with class? football isn't (although the moneyed types are trying to make it that way).
― whatever, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:41 (eighteen years ago)
League is nothing in Scotland. We like Union.
― Herman G. Neuname, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:43 (eighteen years ago)
I don't think Union is a class signifier outside of England, hardly. I don't dislike watching Union matches, tho I far prefer League which to me is a way faster, more beautiful game to watch. I just hate the England team and their smug, Daily Mail reading, management book co-writing players.
― Noodle Vague, Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:46 (eighteen years ago)
They were 0/3 after the first over
― groovypanda, Monday, 14 July 2025 20:24 (eleven months ago)
They’ve steadied the ship at 18/6.
It is difficult to know how much the allegations hanging over one of the players have affected the squad as a whole. Doesn’t seem to have affected the player in question much but I can’t imagine it’s easy for everybody else.
― ShariVari, Monday, 14 July 2025 20:33 (eleven months ago)
New Zealand still has the lowest test score - but it came under serious threat today.
― aphoristical, Monday, 14 July 2025 21:28 (eleven months ago)
This England v India test series was fantastic.
― Corny Capitalism (Tom D.), Monday, 4 August 2025 11:03 (eleven months ago)
Yep! Amazing conclusion
― imago, Monday, 4 August 2025 11:44 (eleven months ago)
Great ad for the game, as they say
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 4 August 2025 11:53 (eleven months ago)
Fantastic stuff. Epic performance from Siraj.
― I would prefer not to. (Chinaski), Monday, 4 August 2025 13:37 (eleven months ago)
Just perfectly balanced, exceptional series.
― Chewshabadoo, Monday, 4 August 2025 21:53 (eleven months ago)
Think that's probably the most one sided match I've ever seen between two top tier nations. Winning by 342 runs in a 50 over match is just astonishing
― groovypanda, Sunday, 7 September 2025 17:06 (ten months ago)
I can only imagine South Africa had one hell of a party the other night.
― Chewshabadoo, Sunday, 7 September 2025 17:37 (ten months ago)
West Indies: What Now FFS
― imago, Monday, 29 September 2025 19:01 (nine months ago)
Second string sure but they just got beaten twice by a country that's just been couped via Discord
― imago, Monday, 29 September 2025 19:02 (nine months ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G5BqlgdXwAAAtzC?format=jpg&name=large
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 6 November 2025 11:28 (eight months ago)
I don’t know why I hoped for anything better, but lol.
― Chewshabadoo, Friday, 21 November 2025 06:27 (seven months ago)
Let's see if this test can stretch to three days or not.
― Tony Bubbles (Tom D.), Friday, 21 November 2025 08:22 (seven months ago)
Green out, England on top!
― Critique of the Goth Programme (Neil S), Friday, 21 November 2025 09:08 (seven months ago)
sleepless night not much fun checking the score at 6.15, feeling much better now though
― Critique of the Goth Programme (Neil S), Friday, 21 November 2025 09:09 (seven months ago)
gonna be a fun series if neither team remembers how to bat
― nxd, Friday, 21 November 2025 09:10 (seven months ago)
a short game's a good game!
― Critique of the Goth Programme (Neil S), Friday, 21 November 2025 09:10 (seven months ago)
I take it all back!
― Chewshabadoo, Friday, 21 November 2025 09:13 (seven months ago)
Stokes running amok here.
― Tony Bubbles (Tom D.), Friday, 21 November 2025 10:06 (seven months ago)
We are back to the 1900s
Most wickets on day one of an Ashes Test25 2nd Test, Melbourne, 1901-02
22 2nd Test, The Oval, 1890
20 Only Test, The Oval, 1882; 2nd Test, Melbourne, 1894-95; 4th Test, Old Trafford, 1909
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 November 2025 10:18 (seven months ago)
Real sowing vs. reaping vibes today
― H.P, Friday, 21 November 2025 11:54 (seven months ago)
England batted for 67.3 overs in the entire match, their shortest total in an Ashes Test (where they lost all 20 wickets) since 1888.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 22 November 2025 07:21 (seven months ago)
Aus will need to score the highest total to win the match.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 22 November 2025 07:22 (seven months ago)
Which they are well on track to doing.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 22 November 2025 08:26 (seven months ago)
Christ, that was brutal.
― I would prefer not to. (Chinaski), Saturday, 22 November 2025 09:57 (seven months ago)
That was something
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 22 November 2025 10:57 (seven months ago)
Got my head on head
― H.P, Saturday, 22 November 2025 11:04 (seven months ago)
Astonishing innings from Head. What a player.
England? Pfft. Basically everything that was suggested; under-prepared, admirable vs ludicrous 'sticking to the gameplan' mentality and a generalised air of hubris. Brisbane could be messy.
― I would prefer not to. (Chinaski), Saturday, 22 November 2025 12:13 (seven months ago)
Joe Root on 70..
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 4 December 2025 09:23 (seven months ago)
Well done Root, with an excellent final wicket partnership too
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 4 December 2025 11:31 (seven months ago)
Can I just say:
lol england
― cocaine bear say hi to me (King Boy Pato), Saturday, 6 December 2025 10:49 (seven months ago)
Worth a lol or two
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 6 December 2025 12:03 (seven months ago)
vmic
― Tony Bubbles (Tom D.), Saturday, 6 December 2025 12:31 (seven months ago)
Oops.
https://www.skysports.com/cricket/news/12040/13484655/the-ashes-snicko-operator-admits-mistake-led-to-incorrect-alex-carey-not-out-decision-during-third-test
― Salted Peanuts (A Student's Plea) (Tom D.), Wednesday, 17 December 2025 10:57 (six months ago)
Might have mattered if the series was alive.
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 17 December 2025 11:50 (six months ago)
Ashes null and void
― Critique of the Goth Programme (Neil S), Wednesday, 17 December 2025 13:58 (six months ago)
Head still remains fixed on Head
― H.P, Friday, 19 December 2025 06:04 (six months ago)
speaking of Trinidad, I've been watching the WI regional final last couple of days. feel like Jayden Seales could end up being WI's best cricketer since Lara packed it in
― imago, Tuesday, 19 May 2026 06:54 (one month ago)
and one of their boys has just seized the all-time Test 6th-wicket stand from Bairstow and Stokes, with a bit of help from Roston Chase
― miserable pessi reign (imago), Sunday, 28 June 2026 08:46 (one week ago)