let us now catalogue famous people

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1528 of them)

Directors who've explicitly cited Eggleston's influence-- Wenders, Van Sant, Sofia Coppola, Korine; case can be made for Malick, Wong Kar Wai/ Christopher Doyle, the Coen brothers, many others. (The other day happened upon Blood Simple on TV; saw so much Eggleston in it-- like, struck by specific shots that directly reminded me of specific Eggleston photographs.)

Of course, once you start looking you (I) see Eggleston everywhere, maybe fallaciously; but he's permeated so much of contemporary visual culture, in large part through the photographers, directors, cinematographers he's influenced. (Can't help seeing him in "True Detective" too.)

And yet, for all that, he maintains his ineffaceable difference/ distinctiveness, the idiosyncrasy, the uniqueness of his aesthetic sensibility. For all his influence, all the things one sees now as "Egglestonian," he's SO NOT replicable. People copy so much about his photographs (often only the most extrinsic of qualities, like: oh here's a picture of an old American car), but no one else in the world has that eye... or something more primordial than the "eye."

drash, Saturday, 15 March 2014 17:30 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/r9Apyao.jpg

Phenomenal high-keyed B&W from Adams

, Friday, 21 March 2014 04:03 (twelve years ago)

That's great.

michaellambert, Friday, 21 March 2014 19:17 (twelve years ago)

http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/an-inside-view-of-arab-photography/

, Friday, 28 March 2014 03:46 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/ex7EuWw.jpg

From IH

, Saturday, 5 April 2014 02:00 (twelve years ago)

http://37.media.tumblr.com/c0e7ed2812f8376aa737874c1aee7683/tumblr_n39oriUGKo1qb6mm9o1_1280.jpg

http://24.media.tumblr.com/9431745e88249548163e96c5dc06354d/tumblr_n384mjNgUe1qb6mm9o1_1280.jpg

nice recent vivian fu photographs

into the secretly-pinkhassov-IH, 龜

mustread guy (schlump), Saturday, 5 April 2014 17:18 (twelve years ago)

uhm vivian fu

mustread guy (schlump), Saturday, 5 April 2014 17:19 (twelve years ago)

http://87-mm.tumblr.com/post/76837448959/merging-boundaries-by-ian-teh

, Monday, 14 April 2014 15:23 (twelve years ago)

http://shihlun.tumblr.com/post/82983643523/wong-ting-hua-jiufen-1960s

, Thursday, 17 April 2014 12:32 (twelve years ago)

http://lightbox.time.com/2014/03/11/beyond-cartier-bresson-a-history-of-a-masters-early-work/

Startling how much the 1st paragraph seems to echo the photograph that turned HCB from painting to photography in the first place, Three Boys at Lake Tanganyika

Second one could be an Atget

, Monday, 21 April 2014 08:42 (twelve years ago)

I guess there's a reason we never see these early photographs tho

, Monday, 21 April 2014 08:42 (twelve years ago)

http://lightbox.time.com/2014/03/12/photos-of-the-real-world-amy-powells-family-album/

, Monday, 21 April 2014 08:55 (twelve years ago)

龜 toiling alone itt

i am gonna catch up on this slick of links ^^^

just beautiful new hirano takaci photographs,

http://37.media.tumblr.com/c777cc1d007e469b04563299524fd2e5/tumblr_n4g7fwZj8f1qe50hoo1_1280.jpg

schlump, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:32 (twelve years ago)

http://hiranotakaci.tumblr.com

schlump, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 20:32 (twelve years ago)

Saw this via Self Publish Be Happy: http://www.robertherman.com/index.php#p=-1&a=0&at=0 ('The New Yorkers')

michaellambert, Tuesday, 22 April 2014 21:02 (twelve years ago)

http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/03/through-her-minds-eye-a-world-apart/

, Wednesday, 23 April 2014 08:03 (twelve years ago)

hard not to love these ian teh photographs

schlump, Thursday, 24 April 2014 19:52 (twelve years ago)

http://www.berettaconsulting.com/barbarossa/WTbigshow.html

°ㅇ๐ْ ° (gr8080), Friday, 25 April 2014 16:23 (twelve years ago)

http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/15/chang-chao-tang-in-taiwan/

, Monday, 28 April 2014 02:19 (twelve years ago)

http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/shigeichi-nagano

, Saturday, 3 May 2014 00:19 (twelve years ago)

those are wild

°ㅇ๐ْ ° (gr8080), Tuesday, 6 May 2014 13:10 (twelve years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/OTIN14S.jpg

What seasoned photographer would ever frame the shot like this unless by accident

Would that I could unlearn everything I know and go back to being a naïf

, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 00:06 (twelve years ago)

so otm

schlump, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 01:12 (twelve years ago)

guys i miss taking pictures

gbx, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 02:08 (twelve years ago)

do you have cellphone snaps you like?

ps hi

schlump, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 02:11 (twelve years ago)

http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/05/08/pictures-on-the-street-its-complicated/

, Sunday, 11 May 2014 03:58 (twelve years ago)

http://www.oitzarisme.ro/2014/04/06/knut-inge-johnsen-snapshots-from-my-window/

Love the repetition here

, Sunday, 11 May 2014 07:56 (twelve years ago)

http://www.lightleaked.com/2014/05/whats-going-on-with-photography-by-carl.html

^ Not pictures, an essay

, Wednesday, 14 May 2014 10:17 (twelve years ago)

http://hamburgereyes.tumblr.com/post/85367928414

, Friday, 16 May 2014 02:03 (twelve years ago)

love michael jang

°ㅇ๐ْ ° (gr8080), Friday, 16 May 2014 02:10 (twelve years ago)

^ My first draft of the post included 'attn: gr808"

, Friday, 16 May 2014 02:16 (twelve years ago)

i accidentally shipped his book w/ those photos to my old hawaii address and it never got forwarded to me :-(

°ㅇ๐ْ ° (gr8080), Friday, 16 May 2014 02:18 (twelve years ago)

Aw :( well it looks like they're reprinting it - I might pick up a copy too

http://vimeo.com/89627741

^ Short lil' thing about Daido M. in Hong Kong - could anything be made that would appeal to me more

, Friday, 16 May 2014 03:14 (twelve years ago)

woah

°ㅇ๐ْ ° (gr8080), Friday, 16 May 2014 03:17 (twelve years ago)

hes the best

°ㅇ๐ْ ° (gr8080), Friday, 16 May 2014 03:22 (twelve years ago)

kind of love this dave eggers photo

http://www.newstatesman.com/sites/default/files/images/2014%2B17taxi.jpg

schlump, Saturday, 17 May 2014 21:26 (twelve years ago)

ty 龜! yeah i'm so into it. there are layers & layers that make a nicely photographed diary of nice photographs nice to look at. like that's almost the most literal & immediate way to finalise & fix your work, right? just with a diary.

also just lost in those mark cohen pictures you posted; i googled to repost a b&w shot from '74 & found this lucrative set on a gallery site. his framing. i remember this interview with the director andrew bujalski, where he was talking about his comfort with his cinematographer, matthias grunsky, how he knows the kind of thing bujalski likes, like an arm suddenly entering the frame. & the cohen shots feel like such a real perspective this way.

http://images.exhibit-e.com/www_danzigerprojects_com/Mark_Cohen_BW_500px_60.jpg

http://images.exhibit-e.com/www_danzigerprojects_com/Mark_Cohen_BW_500px_130.jpg

http://images.exhibit-e.com/www_danzigerprojects_com/Mark_Cohen_BW_500px_210.jpg

schlump, Monday, 19 May 2014 18:19 (twelve years ago)

I've always been kinda suspicious of Mark Cohen, but those are great. Maybe I need to give him another shot.

chinavision!, Monday, 19 May 2014 18:23 (twelve years ago)

ha ha, i think i had the same preexisting opinion maybe? & i forget why. i know we talked about him awhile back. was it maybe because they were like ... levittwave pictures of socioeconomic hard times on porches or something? anyway there's a crazy cohesive thread between the set i posted. thread is really just ... limb-joints. niche.

schlump, Monday, 19 May 2014 18:32 (twelve years ago)

I think I thought of him as a bit, uh, shoot what's that annoying nyc street photographer? The one with the flashes in people's faces? Totally blanking now but kinda like that guy. Aggressive raw tough street photography. All wide angled close ups in black and white, dwelling on people's flawed bodies or ugly lives in an exploitive way.
Probably what most people think of Martin Parr actually, who I actually like so go figure.
It's bugging me that I'm blanking on that one guy right now.

chinavision!, Monday, 19 May 2014 18:59 (twelve years ago)

ha ha, bruce gilden?, right? i say this because this morning after the klein stuff i was watching some of cheryl dunn's everybody street, which has a section on him. he's just such a terrible human being, unredeemed by his shitty photographs. but yeah. i am thinking of the ilx thread where whiney talks about finally a sympathetic eye to the city's homelessness problem.

in case we haven't talked about martin parr within twelve months i can look at his stuff from mexico but only because i'm not regionally aphasic enough to miss its presumably voyeuristic social dimension.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WvOnaoU1UJU/TZsDjs9mQUI/AAAAAAAAAHE/0XVlvTpcryA/s1600/detail_gal03_nov06.jpg

http://www.stephendaitergallery.com/dynamic/images/display/Martin_Parr_Mexico_2992_102.jpg

schlump, Monday, 19 May 2014 19:16 (twelve years ago)

really i will enjoy looking at just any photograph so deeply working the lilac spectrum

schlump, Monday, 19 May 2014 19:17 (twelve years ago)

yeah those are great.
bruce gilden, that's the guy. boy is he annoying.

martin parr is a little tough for me, because the beach photos, he claims, are affectionate or even celebratory, so, ok. they look nice too.
but then the photos of conservative party soirees I like because they seem cutting or damning, but I guess if I'm giving the benefit of the doubt the the beach photos then I have to do the same with these? they also look nice though.

chinavision!, Tuesday, 20 May 2014 00:17 (twelve years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97GwbI27w10

I have this open in a tab right now and I am so excited I cannot press play

, Thursday, 22 May 2014 14:43 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.