what do you see like: 2012

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8046/8092683848_81b3cd3906.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8195/8092677921_592be76eb1.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8054/8092677789_4134a755b4.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8194/8092677663_6759bef4d9.jpg

Great sky over Manchester on Sunday, went for a bike ride to get some "grittier" shots.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8195/8090809141_72894ee1ab_c.jpg

Still digging this random little bit of abstraction.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8463/8077974503_0120d59002_c.jpg

http://distilleryimage7.s3.amazonaws.com/a7b3777815d911e2b9d422000a1fa429_7.jpg

http://distilleryimage1.s3.amazonaws.com/73c9a2ac150c11e28ad722000a9f1498_7.jpg

dope!

v nice!

alright sorry guys, one more series:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8473/8095262338_f442ae730c_z.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8186/8095257623_059c12d91b_z.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8475/8095257427_6875da1388_z.jpg

Love the light in the first one, and the gentle transition between light and shadow. Colours in all of them are A+.

fuji superia! and lots of reflected light.

Ahh, Superia. One of my favourite presets for processing X100 files in Color Efx, although I confess I've never shot a single proper frame of film with it :(

yeah that's so awesome, china - the minute pivots & steps of everyone else in the picture are so satisfying to see split into frames. i tend to blame my camera but i have trouble shooting scenes w/the aperture at 16 & getting nice results, things looking sharp. but everything looks so pronounced and bold there.

I have a feeling that might have been shot at f/8. prob 1/250th with 400 iso film. if that helps at all. I tend to overexpose a bit. last shot even looks like it could have been f/5.6 but I can't really remember.
that's the trouble, when I get back some shots and go "aha yeah that's the way I need to expose in that kind of light!" and then can't really remember how I did it.

that helps. idk, i always hear that once you're at that end of the spectrum, the glass matters less, but i think there's a flatness to some of my shots like that; having some kind of evident depth of field is a sort of easy way to like 'phrase' a scene so i tend to go that way. the environment in the run you posted is so overwhelming.

some phots:

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-fcs6p7lDk5M/UHwrV5uiAuI/AAAAAAAABIo/ziHj3uid0t4/s900/1088.jpg
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-umtNYHnER5A/UG-k3HVogzI/AAAAAAAAA8I/OIBtG6Xf8CI/s900/977.jpg
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-hmyNpMvq56I/UHeZ4tFPV5I/AAAAAAAABD4/tOi41Bk0rsU/s900/1022.jpg
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-ZA2udzlRPfc/UGego_FviBI/AAAAAAAAAyc/PcNkKKHabNE/s900/919.jpg

those are stellar
loove the 2nd and 3rd especially

so much gorgeousness in this thread

love 1 and 2

love the flowers!

1 is great

Yeah, I just keep loving everything on this thread. Currently much love to kenan's water and plants, and not_goodwin's sky.

Good stuff guys, i'm trying to get a way from pretty shots change.

Nothing pretty about an underpass in Salford i can tell you.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8465/8103657393_a94ecf9249_c.jpg

it's not scenic landscape beauty but it's no worse than this
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8191/8098581162_459dd59dc6.jpg

That's the walk to one campus; this is the break room of another

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8196/8086205123_fce97e4cf1.jpg

i mean talk about bleak

more Alvar Aalto spam - - - this house, man. It was one of those days where the clouds would swoop in and out and you sort of had to stand where you knew the photo would be, and wait. Got lucky I think.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8468/8106908874_95fa5b4881_z.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8055/8106935666_59f5f2b011_z.jpg

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8473/8106925440_67ca1011dd.jpg

really great lighting!

back to digital

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8336/8110189001_17b306f9d4_b.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8327/8110190237_f5ae8ef35d_b.jpg

ok, wth is going on with the sunny D orgy?

Heavy fog on the Mersey today, provoking a tantrum from my ferry-loving 7yo...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8043/8110549900_400241078c_z.jpg

Across the river is Wallasey, where I grew up. I never see it better...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8331/8110541063_5b6c707e88_z.jpg

I've never seen it better. GAH.

WOW is that fog shot great.

michael jones on some harrowing-single-frames-from-bela-tarr-movies shit

Michael, that first shot is extraordinary!

Thanks! Need to take more photos when my kids are upset and running away from me.

Regret converting the sea shot to B&W. Kind of a reflexive thing to go for medium-to-high contrast monochrome when taking such a "colourless" shot but I suppose the point about how heavy fog bleaches colour and contrast from a landscape is that it doesn't do it completely. I should have left it as graduated colour, all milky midtones.

Kilchurn Castle Scotland.
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8330/8116934680_3598d21618_c.jpg

Wow, that's gorgeous. The placement of the rocks in the bottom corner balances the composition perfectly. Gorgeous processing.

Seconded, that's classic work right there.

good lord

michael jones on some harrowing-single-frames-from-bela-tarr-movies shit

― *buffs lens* (schlump), Sunday, October 21, 2012 6:36 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It has taken me since April this year to put this up as i wasn't sure about it. Funny how critical you can be of your own work.

on another note, has anyone received an invite from Getty Images on flickr, and is it worth bothering with them?

yo dayo do you still put pictures on the internet? or not at all anymore?

^ twenty first century, ilp equivalent of robert frank stopping publishing to walk around making movies instead

lol I am almost all caught up on my backlog ... might happen within the year

but yeah it's kind of strange - finding out that my tastes are ~continually changing~ and so what I might have wanted to put up half a year ago I don't really want to anymore. so I'll have to go back and see what new sets I wanna make. feel like I'm starting to finally see past/outside of winogrand

at this point I can't even imagine having the self control to sit on *anything* for a year. would probably be a healthy exercise.

Went for a walk with my Fuji X10 near the office this lunchtime. These are a mixture of SOOC and RAW files I've fiddled with in Lightroom to try and match the in camera processing, however in most situations I think I prefer what the camera came up with. Still persevering with trying to recreate the processing, if only to help my own understanding.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8331/8120452337_2ac442410e_z.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8332/8120467034_7fac1fde67_z.jpg
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8195/8120451813_3817472b89_z.jpg

took a cue from that TOP endorsement, tried some Ilford XP2 and it's beauuuutiful stuff:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8192/8117704382_00988c6a7e_c.jpg

Yeah, it's a nice film.

Still playing around with crops, keep spotting nice-looking square images hiding in 2x3 shots...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8324/8123206913_f898be2d22.jpg

Taken from this shot. Still feels weirdly like cheating after my years of loyalty to pure "compose through the lens" thinking.

i know that feeling!!

I think crops are definitely an area where it's like, if there's not a rule, how can I even BEGIN to make a decision? So the square and the 2x3 are both attempts to grab at a rule even though they come from entirely different directions: on the one hand, authenticity of what it looked like through the viewfinder (or, alternately, NOT that but at least the same proportions), ie fealty to the material/technical properties of the device...and on the other hand, arbitrary geometric contraints derived from Plato or whoever. I guess I could also imagine that they're for hypothetical 12" covers or something, so there's a "reality" to the dimension there too. If LightRoom had a "golden rectangle" preset I'd probably start fucking around with that too though.

With film and my DSLR I stick to the native 3:2 ratio.

With the X10 I've set it to shoot 3:2, which is the ratio it shows on screen and crops the jpegs to and looks fine...until I look at the RAW files which are always the native 4:3. When I crop the RAW files down to 3:2 in Lightroom (to keep in line with all my other photos) they never look quite as right as they did in camera - like I'm maybe losing out by removing the top and bottom bands of the image that I was never even aware of when composing at the time.