Your Cameras

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (418 of them)

I'm impatient.

also you guys talking about the screwy bit possibly causing damage made leery

catbus otm (gbx), Friday, 23 March 2012 17:32 (fourteen years ago)

ABORT

catbus otm (gbx), Friday, 23 March 2012 18:08 (fourteen years ago)

I'll mail you one of my extra soft-releases if you want to try one. I never check the e-mail attached to ILX - not sure what google-proofing requires these days but my email is mlpowell@<thesameasbeforethe@>.net

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 23 March 2012 18:34 (fourteen years ago)

It can only cause damage if you put it in a bag with the SR on (or drop it/catch it on something), and lots of people get away with using one no problems. To be safe, you could just screw in the soft-release when you've got it around your neck or however you carry it when not in a bag.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 23 March 2012 18:36 (fourteen years ago)

SR makes most sense when you have low shutter speeds - like 1/15, 1/8, maybe 1/30 - so you could keep it in the bag for those situations

dayo, Friday, 23 March 2012 18:37 (fourteen years ago)

i don't have a camera bag :(

catbus otm (gbx), Friday, 23 March 2012 18:45 (fourteen years ago)

always wondered if a camera bag would serve to make me more or less inconspicuous, esp for street photography

(and ty milo!)

catbus otm (gbx), Friday, 23 March 2012 18:47 (fourteen years ago)

mostly its handy for putting things in!

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Friday, 23 March 2012 19:06 (fourteen years ago)

do you have recommendations

catbus otm (gbx), Friday, 23 March 2012 19:08 (fourteen years ago)

Soft Release is the name of my new softcore porn zine, guys

♆ (gr8080), Friday, 23 March 2012 19:14 (fourteen years ago)

i would like that very much to be true

catbus otm (gbx), Friday, 23 March 2012 19:15 (fourteen years ago)

I use this one:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/16034-REG/Domke_701_83B_F_803_Camera_Satchel_Shoulder.html

dayo, Friday, 23 March 2012 19:23 (fourteen years ago)

yikes, forgot how expensive it is

dayo, Friday, 23 March 2012 19:23 (fourteen years ago)

there's a chinese company called safrotto that makes domke knockoffs. used to be you could buy a safrotto knockoff for 1/2 or 1/3 of the domke price. maybe now it's 3/4 of the domke. domke's are made in the USA though so there's that.

however among a certain savvy group of thieves in foreign countries, "DOMKE" screams "HIGH END CAMERA EQUIPMENT." that's no less true of LOWEPRO though.

dayo, Friday, 23 March 2012 19:31 (fourteen years ago)

I'd check secondhand. I've seen cheap stuff on craigslist and in thrift stores. I like the low key-ness of a 'regular' soft bag from say the late 70s (I use my dad's old bag).

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Friday, 23 March 2012 19:45 (fourteen years ago)

i'm kind of in to this http://www.etsy.com/listing/85065708/medium-dslr-camera-bag-with-leather

♆ (gr8080), Friday, 23 March 2012 19:56 (fourteen years ago)

the high-end, boutique, only-bag-fit-to-carry-a-leica brands are artisan & artist and herringbone

http://www.artisanandartist.com/bags/index.htm

http://www.billingham.co.uk/pages/index.php

dayo, Friday, 23 March 2012 20:04 (fourteen years ago)

wow those billingham ones are gorgeous

♆ (gr8080), Friday, 23 March 2012 20:13 (fourteen years ago)

Cheap camera bag - army surplus or messenger bag of your choosing plus a Domke insert.

I think I'm going to spring for a Courierware Incognito - all the legit camera bags I've tried are too bulky and structured (incl. Billingham), they feel weird to carry. The Courierware is along the lines of that Domke, but with a few niceties (zippered front pockets, zippered iPad pocket, etc., for ~$40 more.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 23 March 2012 20:56 (fourteen years ago)

http://courierbags.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=39&Itemid=162

if you don't care about iPad room, the Mini will hold a Leica plus film and come in at around the same $$$ as a Domke with zippers and stuff.

http://www.indianhillimageworks.com/catalog/camera-bags/the-bare-bones-bag-evolution-bbb-e
also nice - made by Courierware but a guy had them design a model to his specs

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 23 March 2012 20:59 (fourteen years ago)

anyone ever played with a finepix x100? i'm still interesting in buying one, mainly because i've always had a dream of "shooting what i see" and because i very very rarely take any sort of zoom or autofocus shots with my camera.

the late great, Friday, 23 March 2012 21:18 (fourteen years ago)

I have/had (selling it so I can buy a XPro-1 whenever they arrive) one. It's a great little camera, as long as you don't need fast AF. It is AF-only, though, the manual focus is pretty useless. But it works a lot like a rangefinder or Hexar AF - center point focus and recompose, and even though the AF is slowish, it's accurate and faster than I'm able to focus with a RF.

The lens is fantastic - tack-sharp in the center from f/2.8 on, very usable at f/2.

Files are great from 200-800 and good beyond that - not as much range in the high ISOs compared to my old D700, but the camera is half the size of a D700+50mm.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 23 March 2012 21:36 (fourteen years ago)

I'm selling it because I miss being able to go wider or longer and I'm hoping the new sensor has a bit more dynamic range at 1600 and 3200. Sometimes starting to reconsider, though, as the XP1 is quite a bit larger and new Fuji models tend to have quirks that get ironed out in the first months.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 23 March 2012 21:38 (fourteen years ago)

also has an auto-panorama mode which I have not found a use for yet.

here's 180 degrees from my driveway

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7046/7009637847_7373d286c6_b.jpg
X100 Auto Panorama by celluloidpropaganda, on Flickr

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 23 March 2012 23:29 (fourteen years ago)

huh you selling a rolleiflex too then?

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Friday, 23 March 2012 23:52 (fourteen years ago)

I think so. It overlaps with my Bronica too much.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Saturday, 24 March 2012 01:16 (fourteen years ago)

what's the digital equivalent to the yashica T4/ricoh GR1/contax T2 etc – ie simple, robust, small cameras with superb lenses capable of very high image quality

hard in da hummus (cozen), Sunday, 25 March 2012 10:28 (fourteen years ago)

ricoh cameras, the class of cameras that includes the panasonic lx5, canon s90/s95/s100, etc.

dayo, Sunday, 25 March 2012 12:38 (fourteen years ago)

kinda tempting to sell my gf1 and trade it for a small digital like those and a neg scanner

catbus otm (gbx), Sunday, 25 March 2012 16:33 (fourteen years ago)

the Ricoh GRD line is probably the closest in lineage - fast, wide prime vs. the Canon lines relatively slow zoom lenses.

I had a IV for a while and it was awesome, but I couldn't get on with just having a LCD screen for framing and it wasn't that much smaller than my X100. If you don't mind a bit more size, the Ricoh has enough DOF that you could use a simple 28mm hotshoe finder, though.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 25 March 2012 21:33 (fourteen years ago)

maybe I'll go for a GRD 3 or 4... I had the GRD 1 way back when but sold it for funds when unemployed

had a GR1 I had to sell too : /

hard in da hummus (cozen), Sunday, 25 March 2012 21:35 (fourteen years ago)

The IV's improvements are probably worth the premium, the image stabilization worked really well

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 25 March 2012 21:53 (fourteen years ago)

there are times I still miss my old LX3 (its fast, optically-stabilized lens, specifically) over my current GF1.

browsing through my photo library, I notice shots taken at very low shutter speeds that I wonder how I pulled off.

Millsner, Monday, 26 March 2012 07:16 (fourteen years ago)

I've decided that I want one of the twelve Hasselblads that remain on the lunar surface. The ultimate collector's items imo.

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Tuesday, 3 April 2012 13:21 (fourteen years ago)

Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera with APS-C X-Trans CMOS Sensor (Body Only)
by Fuji

List Price: $1,699.95
Price: $1,699.00 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
You Save: $0.95

dayo, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 16:58 (fourteen years ago)

oooo

stet, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:05 (fourteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/UMD9H.jpg

xxp

dayo, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 17:36 (fourteen years ago)

Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera with APS-C X-Trans CMOS Sensor (Body Only)
by Fuji

List Price: $1,699.95
Price: $1,699.00 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
You Save: $0.95

u got one?

catbus otm (gbx), Tuesday, 3 April 2012 18:17 (fourteen years ago)

milo for how much and where are you selling your x100?

the late great, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 19:32 (fourteen years ago)

no I was just commenting on the savings xp

dayo, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 20:03 (fourteen years ago)

I wound up selling it for $900.

Got my XPro-1 late yesterday, I haven't really done anything with it (except for WDYLL ghost story pic) and now we're getting tornados and shit. Never fails: new camera = STORM OF THE CENTURY around here

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 3 April 2012 20:11 (fourteen years ago)

It's about the same weight as the X100 even though it's noticeably bigger. Viewfinder is odd coming from the X100 - not bad but with the 35mm mounted it's kind of like like looking through glasses (because of the magnifer that activates to give you 35mm framelines)

Kinda noisy, the lenses' AF motors appear to be sourced from a 1985 parts bin, but unless you're a wedding photographer I doubt anyone would notice.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 3 April 2012 20:14 (fourteen years ago)

http://i937.photobucket.com/albums/ad215/jiaoqu/kont.jpg

dylannn, Tuesday, 3 April 2012 21:00 (fourteen years ago)

that's a beautiful looking camera. what is it?

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 00:39 (fourteen years ago)

front plate is ripped off but it's a kodak instamatic... bought in changchun....

dylannn, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 01:56 (fourteen years ago)

ah I see it now. the missing front cover looks pretty rad honestly. it's a sleek design.

lou reed scott walker monks niagra (chinavision!), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 02:07 (fourteen years ago)

wow $900 is a lot, i guess its still a hot item

the late great, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 03:53 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.ellenrooneydesign.com/gsproduction/sites/default/files/images/645n-1.jpg

Got one of these cheap. It's kind of amazing, autofocus medium-format that handles like a 35mm camera.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 5 April 2012 04:31 (fourteen years ago)

how much is "cheap"?

looks dope

♆ (gr8080), Thursday, 5 April 2012 04:37 (fourteen years ago)

$450 for body and lens

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 5 April 2012 04:53 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.