the two wide angle primes look really sweet - 24mm f/2 equivalent?! 28 2.5 is not bad either. the 7-14 is a really sweet lens as well, and the f/4 aperture isn't so important since it's much easier to handhold wides than teles. panny's new 25 1.4 (adapted from the leica designed 25 1.4 for the original four thirds platform) also looks really sweet - a superfast normal is what every system needs.
― dayo, Thursday, 15 September 2011 10:44 (twelve years ago) link
and if you're a boss bitch you'd get the voigtlander 25/.95 w/ a EVF and get really good at manual focusing quickly
― dayo, Thursday, 15 September 2011 10:45 (twelve years ago) link
holy balls .95
― remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Thursday, 15 September 2011 14:53 (twelve years ago) link
i'm realizing more and more that i want a VF. i've been dicking around with my Rollei SL35 (ie - just looking at stuff and focusing) and it's reminding me how different shooting with the GF1 is. i love what i can get out of the gf1, but really a lot of the time i'm shooting with it it's from the hip and i just see what comes out later. framing is a secondary concern (esp with post-processing hi-rez images). i should've just pulled the trigger on an OVF
― remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Thursday, 15 September 2011 14:57 (twelve years ago) link
Hey yo, so I just seen some stuff shot on a GH2 (we're talking video here) that looks SICK and am thinking about getting one of these instead of a 7D or 5D. Again this would be for shooting video almost exclusively. I also heard that you can get an older GH1 and hack it to increase the bitrate. Is this true? Any thoughts on these cameras? The 5D seems to be the indie filmmaker/artist's camera of choice now, but I don't see why it has to be. Are these full frame? How are they in low light, etc.?
― lol goat on table (admrl), Monday, 26 September 2011 22:54 (twelve years ago) link
only certain GH1s can be hacked - I think everything that was lacking in the GH1 was then added to the GH2? not sure.
these are not full frame, otoh Panasonic makes lenses that are optimized for video shooting - silent AF, some other features.
low-light, 5D or 7D would probably kick ass, but the GH2 could probably hold its own.
size wise obviously the GH2 is much more versatile.
dont know of any sites that are reviewing this new video capable generation of stills cameras as video cameras, but I know luminous landscape will sometimes opine about the video capability of a product
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/gh2_discoveries.shtml
― dayo, Monday, 26 September 2011 23:00 (twelve years ago) link
This is pretty damning but who knows. Actually it makes me just want to stick to film. Rolling shutter is so ugly:
http://vimeo.com/6894404
― lol goat on table (admrl), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:04 (twelve years ago) link
what about the panny agaf100
― (♯`∧´) (gbx), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:07 (twelve years ago) link
Tell me more
― lol goat on table (admrl), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:07 (twelve years ago) link
oh snap - gbx has got it
wasn't Sony also supposed to release a video camcorder that could be used w/ NEX lenses?
― dayo, Monday, 26 September 2011 23:10 (twelve years ago) link
I kind of feel like the best thing at this point might be like a refurbed GH1 and use the money saved to convert my Bolex gate to super-16 and transfer to HD. I can't see springing for a 5D Mk.II, it doesn't make much financial sense.
xp - there is supposed to be some Sony rival to the 5D, yeah
― lol goat on table (admrl), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:11 (twelve years ago) link
haha my friend bought a bolex hand-crank and tried to make a film with it. you hear nothing but the bolex in all the scenes
― dayo, Monday, 26 September 2011 23:13 (twelve years ago) link
Oh I am a long-time Bolex user and love it, I also don't shoot sync sound though. With that, you either get a silent motor or something that can sit inside a blimp. But trust me the images you can get out of a little clockwork box are fucking unreal if you know what you're doing.
― lol goat on table (admrl), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:14 (twelve years ago) link
haha it was my friend's first film ever. he got it off CL for like...$250 or $300? one of the lenses is a CCTV lens.
― dayo, Monday, 26 September 2011 23:18 (twelve years ago) link
well if the 5d is a stretch money-wise then I'd pass on the agaf100. but it's basically a gh1/2 optimized for video.
if I were gonna make another doc I'd probably go with that tho
― (♯`∧´) (gbx), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:19 (twelve years ago) link
why don't you make another doc?
― lol goat on table (admrl), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:20 (twelve years ago) link
I am trying to make ~myself~ into a doc
― (♯`∧´) (gbx), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:21 (twelve years ago) link
aha I see what you did
― lol goat on table (admrl), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:22 (twelve years ago) link
(=´∀`)人(´∀`=)
― (♯`∧´) (gbx), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:24 (twelve years ago) link
totally tripping balls over here
― lol goat on table (admrl), Monday, 26 September 2011 23:26 (twelve years ago) link
if you get a used/refurbed GH1 and you want hacks do some research on which versions are hackable. I'd also look into what the GH2 improved on, might be worth the initial outlay to get access to features of second gen tech
I think I remember what the panny video m43 lenses have: stepless aperture...
― dayo, Monday, 26 September 2011 23:31 (twelve years ago) link
adamrl - I'd look at the upcoming Sony A77 dSLR. Full-time AF even in film mode thanks to the pellicle mirror. $1300 for the body.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:23 (twelve years ago) link
Coolio, when's it dropping?
― can men eat harmony? (admrl), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:23 (twelve years ago) link
any day now - there are already some being sold in Asia, I think
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:28 (twelve years ago) link
It's a 24MP beast, the already-out A55 has the same 16MP sensor as the Nikon D7000, but I don't know what you're giving up in terms of viewfinder quality/features.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:29 (twelve years ago) link
Well the ubiquity of the 5D must come to an end eventually, surely
― can men eat harmony? (admrl), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:30 (twelve years ago) link
Whatever the 5D II is replaced with will probably be 50% movie camera, or Canon will come out with a dedicated EOS movie camera or something.
If you buy via Canada (someplace like Henry's), new 5DIIs are under $2k USD, which is pretty crazy.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:36 (twelve years ago) link
I did not know that, thank you
― can men eat harmony? (admrl), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 00:38 (twelve years ago) link
Guys reading all these tech sites is making my head spin. What a bunch of bores DSLR nerd are.
So you can basically find a supporting argument for/against any camera you want to buy.
This A77 seems fairly decent though.
http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/collection/6666/top_dslrs_compact_interchangeable_lens_cameras_for_video.html
― can men eat harmony? (admrl), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 01:22 (twelve years ago) link
Yeah, the equipment arguments are all angels dancing on the head of a pin at this point, with a couple of exceptions, at least in terms of stills. I don't know anything about video, other than the D700 doesn't have it.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 27 September 2011 01:29 (twelve years ago) link
You guys
This is where I announce that I am now the proud owner of a GH2. I got the 14-42 kit lens which I heard is not so hot but have ordered adapters so I can use all my c-mount movie lenses and my Pentax film lens. Isn't it exciting??
I also got fat, fast memory and a Hoodloupe so I'm all pimped out
― Mariusz Smiley (admrl), Monday, 9 January 2012 23:52 (twelve years ago) link
One thing though - I'm still not sure this thing shoots TRUE 1080P. Supposedly it does in 24P movie mode, but it's hard to find anything that says this for sure.
― Mariusz Smiley (admrl), Monday, 9 January 2012 23:53 (twelve years ago) link
awesome! are you counting on it to shoot true 1080p?
― bob loblaw people (dayo), Monday, 9 January 2012 23:59 (twelve years ago) link
not counting on it, no. But it seems like a bit of a gray area. that said, the price was right and the only other thing close I would have considered was the 7D.
― Mariusz Smiley (admrl), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 00:01 (twelve years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqhNN2fh-Ew
this was shot on a GH2
― I am that young sis, the beacon, a yardstick (dayo), Saturday, 21 January 2012 15:06 (twelve years ago) link
thoughts on the new olympus?
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY (dayo), Thursday, 9 February 2012 01:32 (twelve years ago) link
link?
― stet, Thursday, 9 February 2012 09:16 (twelve years ago) link
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympusem5/
http://i.imgur.com/4DDtk.jpg
looks like olympus's versions of a panny g series. but it's fully weatherproofed!!
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY (dayo), Thursday, 9 February 2012 12:07 (twelve years ago) link
I am seriously questioning my commitment to DSLRs.
― ●-● (ledge), Thursday, 9 February 2012 12:14 (twelve years ago) link
woah
― stet, Thursday, 9 February 2012 12:19 (twelve years ago) link
My GF1 is barely over a year old, but this is extremely tempting. The new body is nice, but I'm even more interested in seeing how sensor performance compares to the G3/GX1 and if they've improved DR by any noticeable degree.
― Millsner, Thursday, 9 February 2012 12:23 (twelve years ago) link
I doubt it - Panny always seems to have the edge in the sensor tech (not surprising as I think panny manufactures oly's sensor)
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY (dayo), Thursday, 9 February 2012 12:36 (twelve years ago) link
want
― i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Thursday, 9 February 2012 13:19 (twelve years ago) link
now i'm torn between this and the x1
― stet, Thursday, 9 February 2012 13:49 (twelve years ago) link
well since I've got a m43 cam already this seems like a better deal
― i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Thursday, 9 February 2012 14:47 (twelve years ago) link
Cosina-Voigtlander also announced a 17.5/.95 (equivalent of 35mm) manual focus lens.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 9 February 2012 22:10 (twelve years ago) link
I miss having the option for other focal lengths w/ my X100 - between the OM-D and X Pro 1, I don't know which I'd favor.
XP1 - probably superior in low-light (and it seems like half of my shooting is at 1600+), way more expensive, slower AF (presumably), no clue if the lenses are awesome or notOM-D - smaller, cheaper, the 12/2 and 25/1.4 are great lenses, image stabilization in the body, add-on grip that will probably make it more comfortable for my big hands...
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 9 February 2012 23:23 (twelve years ago) link
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, February 9, 2012 4:10 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
wait for m43?
― i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Thursday, 9 February 2012 23:43 (twelve years ago) link
Indeed. Probably $600-700, I'd guess. I'm not too sure about the usefulness of super-fast MF glass for those systems, tbh. Very thin depth of field and magnification being the only reliable way to manually focus is a weird combo.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 10 February 2012 00:24 (twelve years ago) link
yeah I think those lenses are useful as 1.) baubles to be admired and 2.) shooting in the faint light
the olympus 17/2.8 will take you 90% of the way there, the panny 20mm/1.7 will take you 105% the way there (i.e. will probably outshoot the 17/0.95 at all apertures head to head)
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY (dayo), Friday, 10 February 2012 00:32 (twelve years ago) link