Batman carries on beginning in ... The Dark Knight

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
And Heath Ledger is the Joker.

Exciting!

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 10:50 (seventeen years ago) link

NOOOOOO

ferzaffe (flezaffe), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 10:53 (seventeen years ago) link

: D

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 10:54 (seventeen years ago) link

films take so LONG to make nowadays.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Cue "Brokeback Batman" jokes.

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:02 (seventeen years ago) link

broke batcave man

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:05 (seventeen years ago) link

Exactly *ONE* good film vs. about thirty crap ones does not make you eligible for playing the Joker.

I am very sad. :c

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:09 (seventeen years ago) link

D:

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:15 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm trying to decide if its A Knight's Tale or 10 Things I Hate About You that you are classing as the one good filum.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:17 (seventeen years ago) link

CLEARLY THE ANSWER IS THE PATRIOT.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:33 (seventeen years ago) link

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41939000/jpg/_41939536_radcliffe2_bodygetty.jpg

Radcliffe Joker-casting rumors for Batman Begins 2 start NOW

-- latebloomer (posercore24...), July 28th, 2006 3:09 PM. (latebloomer)

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:37 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually he is busy being naked on some stage in the West End. True!

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:41 (seventeen years ago) link

Hairy Potter, etc.

Clearly all Heath has to do is to give us a performance in line with Roar.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:47 (seventeen years ago) link

I remember reading somewhere online that Robin Williams was going to play the Joker, so in light of this I think Heath is a much better choice. I wince just thinking about how awful Williams would be.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:53 (seventeen years ago) link

And yet imagine how happy we'd all be when the Joker died.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Like they're going to kill off the Joker.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:55 (seventeen years ago) link

Actually, if he just does a billion times campier version of whichever brother Grimm he was, it might. just. work.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:02 (seventeen years ago) link

The idea of Heath Ledger camping it up kind of blows my mind.

So, is the official rule "all freakish villains must be played by attractive young actors"?

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Also any word on who will be Harvey Dent, if he is indeed in the picture?

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:03 (seventeen years ago) link

So, is the official rule "all freakish villains must be played by attractive young actors"?

Except in the Spiderman movies, where they're played by regular-looking middle aged actors.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:09 (seventeen years ago) link

weirdest casting ever

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:14 (seventeen years ago) link

Willem Dafoe =/= "regular looking".

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:15 (seventeen years ago) link

i mean on one hand i'm glad they didn't go with an obvious "cuh-RAZY" guy like crispin glover

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:15 (seventeen years ago) link

You're right, that would have been too awesome.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:17 (seventeen years ago) link

They should have picked Gabrielle Union.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:18 (seventeen years ago) link

OMG CHRISTOPHER NOLAN PLS CAST GINA TORRES AS NEXT CATWOMAN.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:19 (seventeen years ago) link

OH man how hottttt would that be.

I was really hoping for Christopher Ecclestone, me. Although Crispin Glover would have been equally great (although he would also be a fantastic Mad Hatter/Riddler/any of the "extremely crazy" Batman variety villains).

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:27 (seventeen years ago) link

I should say "although" a lot more.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:27 (seventeen years ago) link

DARE I SAY IT!?!?...

CRISPIN GLOVER AS BATMANG!?!?! OMG I R JEENYUS

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:29 (seventeen years ago) link

HEY YOU, JOKER, GET YOUR DDDDAMN HHHHANDS OFF HER

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:30 (seventeen years ago) link

I wish I had an animated gif of the creepy sidestep along the fence he does in Wild at Heart. PERFEKT FOR BATMAN BEING SNEAKY.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:31 (seventeen years ago) link

Ecclestone would quit after filming the first half hour of the movie.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Ledger in red lipstick? Hm.

elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Like they're going to kill off the Joker.

They did it once before, jeez! (I mean, I fully understand if you want to scrub Nicholson from your brain.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:18 (seventeen years ago) link

I liked Ledger's bit in Brothers Grimm quite a lot.

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:27 (seventeen years ago) link

In fact I really don't understand what people have against him besides Heath Ledger is a completely ridiculous name.

TOMBOT (TOMBOT), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, I have no problem with this choice myself.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:30 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't have anything against Heath Ledger besides "A Knight's Tale" being one of the worst movies ever made, ever.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:31 (seventeen years ago) link

His performance in Brokeback surprised me enough that I don't put it past him to do an awesome job here.

Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:33 (seventeen years ago) link

I am just concerned because this role is so incredibly different from everything else he's ever done that I can't even fathom what it's going to be like. Doesn't mean it's going to be bad, just utterly unpredictable.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I could use more of that in movies!

Zwan (miccio), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:36 (seventeen years ago) link

The "folk-dancing" scene in "A Knight's Tale" made me want to destroy Hollywood but I'm sure he'll be fine here.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Totally yay for him for picking such a drastically different role, yeah, but I have no reason to think this is going to be a good thing, beside his one good movie ever.

NEXT UP: ORNALDO BLOOMPS IS THE PENGUIN.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Hahahaahah

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:39 (seventeen years ago) link

He took down that Bale thing HARDCORE

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:39 (seventeen years ago) link

What's Brokeback Mountain?

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:49 (seventeen years ago) link

A ride in Branson's theme park.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:50 (seventeen years ago) link

DAMMMNNN

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:50 (seventeen years ago) link

What's yr problem with a Knight's Tale, easily the most authentic 14th century flick ever.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:04 (seventeen years ago) link

His performance in Brokeback surprised me enough that I don't put it past him to do an awesome job here.

yeah, totally.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:05 (seventeen years ago) link

i like this casting, it's like the last person you'd think of or the role. unpredictability is good.

de latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:41 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't think I've ever seen a Heath Ledger movie.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:42 (seventeen years ago) link

What's yr problem with a Knight's Tale, easily the most authentic 14th century flick ever.

See, it could be super-authentic but that doesn't mean that watching ren-faire rejects drop it like it's hot is my idea of a good time.

BTW, I saw "Transporter 2" a couple of weeks ago, and DAMMMNNN

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:45 (seventeen years ago) link

The Dark Knight's Tale

de latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:48 (seventeen years ago) link

Seriously though there's no way this is going to be released as The Dark Knight. For marketing reasons alone they're going to make the title Batman: The Dark Knight or something else.

de latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Wandering thru the local toy chain this weekend, i saw that they still had plenty of the B.Begins/Ra's Al Guhl figure.

How many action figures has Liam Neeson generated? Just Ra's and Qui-Gon? Where's my Darkman figure?

kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Dudes, the guy that directed the two Transporter movies is gonna do the next Hulk movie! DAAAAAAAAAAAAMN or something!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 15:01 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=4329372

jeez, $13 from wal-mart. that's gotta be like, what, $23 anywhere else?

kingfish cyclopean ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 15:04 (seventeen years ago) link

Transporter guy OFF HULK, back on Transporter 3 NOW.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 15:20 (seventeen years ago) link

How many action figures has Liam Neeson generated?

http://www.hasbro.co.uk/images/shop/product/801022650.gif

Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 15:32 (seventeen years ago) link

Batman: The Dark Night Arrives

or

Batman: The Dark Knight Returns...FOR THE FIRST TIME!

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 15:38 (seventeen years ago) link

oops knight

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link

How about a NEW VILLAIN?

Also, Bale is going to ruin his career now.

IPSISSIMUS (Uri Frendimein), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 16:00 (seventeen years ago) link

New villain = The Dark Knight, duh.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 16:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Batman is the dark knight.

IPSISSIMUS (Uri Frendimein), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 16:08 (seventeen years ago) link

i think heath ledger is a pretty great actor, despite making a few shitty films. he's got this nasty edge to him that i can see working for the role.

gear (gear), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:35 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.moviepoopshoot.com/comics101/images/2005/aug3/joker.jpg

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Movies that have the word "knight" in them are all traditionally terrible (First Knight, Knight's Tale, that's about all I'm basing this theory on) so I'm more worried about that then about Heath "Heathy Coffee" Ledger, that's for sure. His performance basically made Brokeback Mountain 3x better than it actually was and he is also the best thing about Brothers Grimm and 10 Things I Hate About You is actually pretty entertaining. I will not defend something as abominable as The Patriot though.

Also I don't know what you people are talking about with this "young, good-looking villians" thing, Cillian Murphy is like some nightmare cross between Crispin Glover and F*** S*******, and whatshisface who isn't a villian yet but will be in Spiderman is like a poor man's Colin Farrell, and those are the only two I can even think of that fall under this category so I won't take it as a trend.

Ornaldo would be better as Catwoman than as the Penguin. I hope they do NOT reintroduce Catwoman (bad enough they are redoing the Joker, not that I don't think Nicholson needs to be redone and erased completely from human conciousness) and instead do Harley Quinn if they need a "sexy female villian."

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:47 (seventeen years ago) link

cillian murphy was awesome.

gear (gear), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:49 (seventeen years ago) link

whatshisface who isn't a villian yet but will be in Spiderman is like a poor man's Colin Farrell = Topher Grace???

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:49 (seventeen years ago) link

No, the other dude. Topher Grace is like a poor man's...Tobey Maguire.

Cillian Murphy might've been awesome but he doesn't qualify as "good looking" unless you really like Crispian Glover space aliens, in my mind at least. I mean he totally looks like a creepy movie dude.

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:51 (seventeen years ago) link

OH Franco.
Cillian Murphy was WAY sexy in the airplane movie.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Ornaldo would be better as Catwoman than as the Penguin.

This is so true.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:51 (seventeen years ago) link

some nightmare cross between Crispin Glover and F*** S*******

ROFFLE ROFFLE ROFFLE ROFFLE ROFFLE ROFFLE

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:52 (seventeen years ago) link

F*** S*******

Frnk Sinatraa?

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Fred Savalas (Terry's hirsute bro?)

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:52 (seventeen years ago) link

No, the other dude. Topher Grace is like a poor man's...Tobey Maguire.

that's what they're going for, too!

de latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:52 (seventeen years ago) link

Telly /= Terry

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:53 (seventeen years ago) link

Srsly where is Nicole? ROFFLE ROFFLE

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Ja, I know that is why they chose Topher Grace, I was being sarcastic!

xpost You might roffle but I can only cringe!!

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:54 (seventeen years ago) link

http://www.bryton.net/images/celebs/FredSavage.jpg

Huk-L (Huk-L), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:56 (seventeen years ago) link

I was referring solely to the New Better Batman Franchise, not all superhero movies, sorry for misunderstanding.

And I think Cillian Murphy is a FOX. Clearly I am alone on this.

whatshisface who isn't a villian yet but will be in Spiderman is like a poor man's Colin Farrell = him from Sideways? Franco? Buh-huh? I can not think of any person in the Spidey cast who can match the ferocity of Mr. Farrell's eyebrows

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:57 (seventeen years ago) link

cillian murphy seemed way too young and prettyboyish to me.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I think Franco, the dude who just sits around with big eyebrows and a blank "glare" stock expression. I guess his real name is "Franco" but I'm not really sure about it and hell if I'm pulling up IMDB!!! I REFUSE.

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:59 (seventeen years ago) link

I guess his real name is "Franco"

For some reason that has me giggling wildly at my desk. But yeah, James Franco, although I still say his eyebrows are NOTHING compared to Farrell (who lest we forget was ALSO A SUPERHERO VILLAIN).

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:01 (seventeen years ago) link

FRED SANFORD!?!?!?! I hate that this is bothering me.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:01 (seventeen years ago) link

Damn it Nick that was my next guess!

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Kirsten Dunst : forehead :: Colin Farrell : eyebrows

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Well few people are anything compared to Colin Farrell, who somehow embodies everything that is wrong in Hollywood without so much as, uh, lifting an eyebrow. But that dude still makes me think of Farrell, with his big eyes and his "glare" expression. He's kind of like a Colin Farrell mixed with...Josh Hartnett, maybe.

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:02 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm just really mad at Colin Farrell over a GIS "incident" which just occurred a few minutes ago, don't mind my derail. Heath Ledger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Colin Farrell or Franky Franco so I'm all for him.

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:03 (seventeen years ago) link

ROFFLE ROFFLE ROFFLE ROFFLE ROFFLE ROFFLE

Yes, yes indeed.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh shit I get it.

Oh shit I feel like an internerd / ILX lifer for getting it.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:09 (seventeen years ago) link

Well duh.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:10 (seventeen years ago) link

who is it?!

de latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:10 (seventeen years ago) link

yes 'splain plz.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:14 (seventeen years ago) link

If you have to ask etc etc etc

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Guys, it's seriously not funny or interesting or anything, it's a random joke about a photo of himself a verrrrrrrrrrrrry ex-ILXor used to post all the time on internets.

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:51 (seventeen years ago) link

What's Your Name? Who's Your Daddy?

One-Way Ticket To Hell (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I started that thread? The fuck.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 19:59 (seventeen years ago) link

LOL@that thread!!!!!!!!!!
LOL@"the picture" still existing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL@otis's website still existing!!!!!!!!!!

THAT IS A TREAT

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 20:07 (seventeen years ago) link

It all comes back!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 20:08 (seventeen years ago) link

Hmm, I believe that was when I was boycotting ILE for a month after it started.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 20:10 (seventeen years ago) link

I am just concerned because this role is so incredibly different from everything else he's ever done that I can't even fathom what it's going to be like.

He attempted camp in Casanova and was quite splendid.

The casting choice here admittedly blew my mind. I never cared for him until Brokeback Mountain, but he was so marvelous it's almost impossible to separate him from Ennis Del Mar.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 21:05 (seventeen years ago) link

And I think Cillian Murphy is a FOX. Clearly I am alone on this.

I think Cillian Murphy is generally considered the best looking actor of his generation. Ally's views are to be treated as that of a dangerous maverick.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:02 (seventeen years ago) link

casanova was not fucking "splendid." dude.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Fucking splendidly, Alfred meant.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:03 (seventeen years ago) link

he was a total eunuch in that movie. i still don't understand how they made a movie about casanova totally, pathetically sexless.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:03 (seventeen years ago) link

Dear, I said Ledger was splendid in Casanova, not the film, although it's the most diverting Lasse Hallstrom joint in years.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:22 (seventeen years ago) link

and i said he was a total eunuch!

i'm glad people have stopped casting him as european dudes, it just makes no sense

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:30 (seventeen years ago) link

You do have a point. The part of Ennis Del Mar was such a good fit in part because it suited his ropey looks and rumbly baritone. But it's just as mannered a performance as playing the Joker might be.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:33 (seventeen years ago) link

agreed!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:45 (seventeen years ago) link

A low-voiced Joker would certainly be a first.

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 22:58 (seventeen years ago) link

not to mention a gay cowboy joker!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 23:01 (seventeen years ago) link

I guess his real name is "Franco"
http://www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~madison/worst/directory/franco/franco.jpg
but I'm not really sure about it

literalisp (literalisp), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 23:11 (seventeen years ago) link

As far as Casanova's go, Heath is pretty lame.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 00:16 (seventeen years ago) link

Alba, what generation are you talking about? If by "generation" you mean dudes that kind of look like you, then...well actually even then I think you are wrong?

Also we were wondering to ourselves last night, what exactly IS a typical Heath Ledger role that the Joker would be distinct from? He seems kind of all over the map?

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:06 (seventeen years ago) link

I don't really know much about generations, you have found me out. It's true that the people I consider good-looking are like better versions of me. Anyway, lots of people do swoon at Cillian Murphy's looks, is the point. Those eyes!

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh no I know there are certainly ppls who do, I'm just saying that "he is considered the best looking actor of his generation" seems like the kind of sweeping overstatement that even I wouldn't approach. Well, ok, I might, but it'd be silly.

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:14 (seventeen years ago) link

I was attention-seeking through hyperbole.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Tart.

Jesus Da n (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:31 (seventeen years ago) link

i don't get why they're doing the Joker again; didn't "batman" cover the creation of the Joker already?

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Nolan is doing it right this time.

c('°c) (Leee), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:39 (seventeen years ago) link

http://rachelpink.typepad.com/rachelpinkridesthebus/images/frugal.jpg
"Hmmm, needs more bathos!"

Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:44 (seventeen years ago) link

over time I've come to think that the Burton/Nicholson version of the Joker is actually pretty awful. Having watched it again recently, the first Burton Batman movie is an incredibly clumsy and misconceived enterprise (the second one is actually WAY better!)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:50 (seventeen years ago) link

(insert the drudge sirens here)

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:56 (seventeen years ago) link

i don't get why they're doing the Joker again; didn't "batman" cover the creation of the Joker already?

Isn't this kind of like asking "I don't get why the Superman movie go into his origin; didn't they cover that in the television show?"

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:56 (seventeen years ago) link

(Basically, the fact that they're both movies about Batman does not mean that they are canonical with each other.)

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:57 (seventeen years ago) link

I hope the script's a little less starchy this time. No gangsters who say things like "you've never tasted desperate."

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 20:34 (seventeen years ago) link

(the second one is actually WAY better!)

Easily the best ever. Next comes the original original Adam West movie.

literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 20:45 (seventeen years ago) link

You think Christian Bale might drop his gravelly 7-year-old-pretending-to-be-the-boogeyman "I'M BATMAN" voice and just use his Bruce Wayne one? It's so ridiculous as is. Halle Berry gave up her African (I assume that's what she was going for) Storm accent after the first movie, so there's precedent.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 20:49 (seventeen years ago) link

Remember the voice modulators used in this film?

http://www.dvdscan.com/V_30.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 20:56 (seventeen years ago) link

You know, I forgot how "heyyyyyy!" those posters were.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 21:03 (seventeen years ago) link

i don't understand the Returns love. that movie blew!

de latebloomer's 2015 youth crew revival (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 21:05 (seventeen years ago) link

OUT

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:01 (seventeen years ago) link

not before i bite yer nose off like the penguin!

honestly though, i'm sick of almost anything burton-related these days.

i loved it as a kid.

de latebloomer's 2015 youth crew revival (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:10 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah Burton's promise has been badly squandered. He had a nice streak there for little while tho.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:11 (seventeen years ago) link

nothing will ever top the first batman, except maybe an appearance by bat-mite

david allen grier (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:13 (seventeen years ago) link

don't forget Ace the Bat-hound

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:15 (seventeen years ago) link

The first Batman movie hasn't aged as well I as thought it would.

GILLY'S "BATDANCE" OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:40 (seventeen years ago) link

LIES

PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:40 (seventeen years ago) link

batman returns would be better without the penguin.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:43 (seventeen years ago) link

b-b-but his lil' funeral march chokes me up every time!!!

literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:53 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah the penguin shit is what sinks that film

gear (gear), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:55 (seventeen years ago) link

When we say first Batman movie are we talking about the one with Adam West or the one with Robert Wuhl? Because the one with Adam West is great.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:56 (seventeen years ago) link

tim burton hasn't made a film i've enjoyed in the past fifteen years, though 'sleepy hollow' was alright.

gear (gear), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:56 (seventeen years ago) link

don't drag arli$$ into this

PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:57 (seventeen years ago) link

ed wood is awesome.

de latebloomer's 2015 youth crew revival (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:57 (seventeen years ago) link

black and white, red and gree-heen

de latebloomer's 2015 youth crew revival (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:58 (seventeen years ago) link

the funkiest thang, you ever see-heen

de latebloomer's 2015 youth crew revival (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:58 (seventeen years ago) link

yeah, Ed Wood + the first two-thirds of Sleepy Hollow and about half of Mars Attacks more than dignifies Tim Burton's last fifteen years.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:58 (seventeen years ago) link

maybe i should re-change my login name to "the arms of orion"

PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 22:59 (seventeen years ago) link

let me stick the 7" in the computer

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:00 (seventeen years ago) link

i got a batdance 7" when i saw the movie

PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:02 (seventeen years ago) link

and a cyndi lauper one when i saw the goonies

PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:03 (seventeen years ago) link

oh i forgot ed wood. i can't roll with one minute of 'mars attacks', though.

gear (gear), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:03 (seventeen years ago) link

i myself got the 12"

gear (gear), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:03 (seventeen years ago) link

i like mars attacks better
http://www.agora-net.com/~way/bush/PenguinCheney.jpg
ever time i see it

literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:04 (seventeen years ago) link

I like everything in Mars Attacks except Nicholson's Vegas dude and the gratuitous Danny DeVito cameo.

I sold the Batman soundtrack for 2 bucks in 7th grade, and I really regret it.

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:05 (seventeen years ago) link

i revisited it last year while at the record store and, um, yeah

PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:06 (seventeen years ago) link

i had the soundtrack on cassete. i'd clean my room while listening to it.

de latebloomer's 2015 youth crew revival (latebloomer), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:06 (seventeen years ago) link

'the future' pwns

gear (gear), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:07 (seventeen years ago) link

one of the videos where he's all jokered up = one of prince's best looks

literalisp (literalisp), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:07 (seventeen years ago) link

this movie, "buffalo stance," and my sisters perm are pretty much the defining moments of the late 80s for me

PARTYMAN (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:08 (seventeen years ago) link

THE #1 HIT MEDLEY!

Zwan (miccio), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:09 (seventeen years ago) link

I sold the Batman soundtrack for 2 bucks in 7th grade, and I really regret it.

-- Zwan (anthonyisrigh...), August 2nd, 2006 8:05 PM. (miccio) (later) (link)

WHAT.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:12 (seventeen years ago) link

Jessie is wise.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:52 (seventeen years ago) link

ALL HAIL THE NEW KING IN TOWN

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 23:56 (seventeen years ago) link

eight months pass...
Exciting/a bit crap pictures of Heath Ledger in his Joker outfit

Alba, Friday, 20 April 2007 08:41 (sixteen years ago) link

JOKER HAS TARANTINO HAIR?!

Tuomas, Friday, 20 April 2007 08:43 (sixteen years ago) link

okay. he looks like Martin Clunes.

Ste, Friday, 20 April 2007 08:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Also starring Caroline Quentin as Catwoman.

chap, Friday, 20 April 2007 12:31 (sixteen years ago) link

WOW IT'S LIKE YOU CAN'T MAKE OUT ANYTHING IN THE PHOTOS

LET'S SPECULATE

David R., Friday, 20 April 2007 12:42 (sixteen years ago) link

sorry your shouteeness. I should have wrote

"okay. he looks like Martin Clunes IN THAT PHOTO"

Ste, Friday, 20 April 2007 12:45 (sixteen years ago) link

NO NEED TO APOLOGIZE

I'M JUST FEELING LOUD TODAY

GO AHEAD WITH YOUR SPECULUMS

David R., Friday, 20 April 2007 12:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Heath Ledger. *sigh* As bad/boring a choice as whatshisname from Scent... Chris O'Donnel?

nathalie, Friday, 20 April 2007 12:54 (sixteen years ago) link

AWESOME. they're going with one of my favourite Batman story arcs, the one where the Joker makes a movie. in the first still you can see him outside his trailer.

Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 20 April 2007 13:58 (sixteen years ago) link

bloodtrap80

David R., Friday, 20 April 2007 13:59 (sixteen years ago) link

http://chattablogs.com/holtonian/archives/joker.bmp

Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 20 April 2007 14:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Now all Heath Ledger has to do is play Bruce Wayne and we got ourselves a good film.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 20 April 2007 14:29 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

http://www.newsarama.com/movies/darkknight/HeathJoker_t.jpg

first official pic...

totally creepy!!

chaki, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I agree.

Alex in SF, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Jesus!

That's great! Yikes!

Rock Hardy, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

looks like the evil clown from House of 1000 Corpses

milo z, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Looks like the Crow, more like.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

After a bender.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

Alternately, Robert Smith's greatest triumph.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:37 (sixteen years ago) link

That Joker Picture + Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent = Me being v. excited

Gukbe, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I think this might be very, very awesome.

HI DERE, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Yup.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 May 2007 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link

wow!

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 01:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Ledger in red lipstick? Hm.

-- elmo argonaut (allocryptic), Tuesday, August 1, 2006 1:15 PM (9 months ago)

So let's hear your judgment, elmo.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 01:27 (sixteen years ago) link

anthony michael hall is in this too apparently:

http://www.dailynews.com/celebrities/ci_5943152

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 01:47 (sixteen years ago) link

as what the riddler

s1ocki, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 01:49 (sixteen years ago) link

oh man

river wolf, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 01:50 (sixteen years ago) link

it's TOP SECRET

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 01:50 (sixteen years ago) link

the $200m secret

river wolf, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 01:53 (sixteen years ago) link

LEMME GUESS...CATWOMAN

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:00 (sixteen years ago) link

Anthony Michael Hall IS Killer Croc

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:01 (sixteen years ago) link

that is sum fucked up shit

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:06 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm guessing the Penguin? Robin?

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:09 (sixteen years ago) link

"They're shooting in London, Chicago and Hong Kong. My next dates are in Chicago, the third week of August with Morgan, then I get to go back to London." He adds he's never been a comic-book fan, but "I loved the 'Batman' series, so Batman has truly always meant something to me. It's really been one of my dreams as an actor to become Batman."

omg he's gonna take christian bale's place in 3!

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:12 (sixteen years ago) link

AMH as Bookworm, plz plz plz...favorite Batvillian ever!

Abbott, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Eric Roberts is in this too, as a gangster.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

C. Thomas Howell IS the Mad Hatter

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

Jake Busey IS Mr. Freeze

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Dolph Lundgren IS Clayface

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:25 (sixteen years ago) link

running out of villains here, help me out

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Parker Posey IS Poison Ivy

Abbott, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:28 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.funny-business.com/uploads/images/94/JEFF_DUNHAM.jpg

Jeff Dunham as The Ventriloquist

chaki, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:31 (sixteen years ago) link

lol

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:34 (sixteen years ago) link

The Ventriloquist... ON A STEEEEEK

kenan, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:42 (sixteen years ago) link

there's a bunch of obscure ones here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Batman_enemies

i think this one's my favorite for sheer wtf-ness:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Quilt

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:48 (sixteen years ago) link

created by Jack Kirby, no less!

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Crazy-Quilt's sight was restored briefly for a time after he kidnapped a surgeon to assist him, Batman and Grayson's Robin intervened, and in self defence, Robin reflected the madman's light beams back into his newly restored eyes, inadvertently blinding Quilter permanently. Obsessing over his young adversary, he became one of the few batvillains to hate Robin more than his mentor.

HAHAHAhahahaha

Abbott, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoa Bookworm was played by Roddy McDowall!

Abbott, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 02:54 (sixteen years ago) link

http://ibelieveinharveydent.warnerbros.com/images/dent.jpg

remy bean, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 03:55 (sixteen years ago) link

called it

river wolf, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 04:01 (sixteen years ago) link

as in: i read the internet

river wolf, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 04:03 (sixteen years ago) link

Plus, Batmanuel (!!!) Nestor Carbonell is reportedly playing the mayor of Gotham in this.

Roz, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 06:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I think that Joker looks pretty stupid. What's up with the smeared lipstick and the scars? I thought Joker was supposed to be an evil dandy clown, not a horror movie monster.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 11:13 (sixteen years ago) link

i think it fits, tho i grew up on the batman of 'dark knight'/'killing joke' moreso than cesar romero.

stevie, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 11:43 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, I thought Joker was supposed to be a horribly mutilated mass murderer.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 11:52 (sixteen years ago) link

if you look at that picture closely, you'll see there are in fact some mutilated parts below the cheek area.

i'm still undecided by it though

Ste, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 12:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I thought Joker was supposed to be an evil dandy clown, not a horror movie monster.

the evil dandy clown version was done already in the Burton Batman. the character has been interpreted in enough various ways to warrant doing it differently this time around. i like it, it keeps the villain in line with the "creepy" approach they took towards the Scarecrow.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 12:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i9.tinypic.com/4t8g9hj.png

This was the Joker-fied Dent banner that was hiding that new Joker Wayne Gacy pic. There's been a bit more of this viral marketing thingy going on apparently. Details here:

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/12513314.html

I'm getting excited now.

Roz, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 12:48 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, there was this site too with the wierd secret messages :

http://ibelieveinharveydenttoo.com/

Ste, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:00 (sixteen years ago) link

im so happy eric roberts is in this

homosexual II, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:08 (sixteen years ago) link

when is this out again?

akm, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:19 (sixteen years ago) link

next summer

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:21 (sixteen years ago) link

im so happy eric roberts is in this

-- homosexual II, Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:08 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

wow i guess there really is a first time for everything!

s1ocki, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:21 (sixteen years ago) link

So looking forward to this.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:22 (sixteen years ago) link

http://ibelieveinharveydenttoo.com/

"see you in december"

koogs, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:40 (sixteen years ago) link

but what happens in December?

Ste, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:48 (sixteen years ago) link

I think that Joker looks pretty stupid. What's up with the smeared lipstick and the scars? I thought Joker was supposed to be an evil dandy clown, not a horror movie monster

Um, no.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 13:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, yeah, I know he's face was changed in a chemical accident, and I'm not against character revision... It's just that the image seems to imply they want to have a "darker", more brutal Joker, which is in line with the altogether darker approach they're taking with the new films, and I'm not sure if that's a good thing. The nice thing with Burton's films (and even Schumacher's) was that they blended the Gothy darkness with the essential absurdity in the heart of any superhero story, so they worked fine as modern fables. But as I said in the big debate we had about Batman Begins, I don't think Batman should be taken too seriously, which is why I think Joker works better as a dapper fellow who's just completely insane, rather than as some Hannibal Lecter type of psychopath serial killer.

Besides, if Joker has a mutilated face, doesn't he come a bit too close to Two-Face, who I see is also in the film?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

The nightmarish visions of what the Batman Begins thread turned into are starting to recur...

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:19 (sixteen years ago) link

> doesn't he come a bit too close to Two-Face, who I see is also in the film?

did the big Harvey Dent posters tip you off? 8)

that 'see you in december' is what the html source of that page reads if you scrub out all the 'Ha Ha' stuff. no idea what it means, other than 'wait'.

koogs, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Heath's face too fat and round to play the Joker. Mind you so was Nicholson's.

ledge, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Dude, with the exception of the 1940s-1960s, the Joker has always been portrayed as a violent sociopath, not a hilarious trickster-thief. I mean, look at what he did to poor Barbara Gordon. Playing the Joker dark and scary is totally appropriate and lives up to what (IMO) is the best part about Batman--the really awesome/interesting/scary villains. xxpost

jessie monster, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't mean he shouldn't be dark and scary and violent, I'd just rather see him as funny-dark rather tortured-dark.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, it's totally in keeping with Batman existing more along the Doc Savage/The Shadow/Dick Tracy axis than the Superman/Green Lantern axis.

For that matter, Captain America and the Red Skull pretty much work the same kind of angle.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Here is how I would cast it:

Batman/Bruce Wayne: Mark
Two-Face/Harvey Dent: Scott
Joker: Kevin
Gordon: Bruce
Barbara Gordon: Dave

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:41 (sixteen years ago) link

FWIW I think The Joker's "dark sense of humor" is supposed to come into play in this film.

BONUS POINTS: Katie Holmes is replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel Dawes in this.

nickalicious, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

And thank god for that.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Does anyone know if this movie is based on "The Long Halloween"? The last one already took some bits of it, and the Harvey Dent thing makes me suspect this one will too.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:47 (sixteen years ago) link

ledge otm about nicholson face.

but the more i'm reading stuff online about this new one the more i'm warming to it. I love dark and nasty Joker, and am a huge fan of the Arkham Asylum graphic novel.

it's difficult to draw a conclusion on how Ledger is going to play this Joker just from one picture tho. I'm sure they'll be some 'harlequinn' banter at some point surely.

Ste, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Okay that is perfect!

HI DERE, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

The Joker isn't in The Long Halloween. It DOES look like it will take elements of that and Dark Victory though, since Sal Maroni is also in it.

jessie monster, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Can we cast Jake Gyllenhaal as Gay Cowboy?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

I am kind of wondering if the A Story will be from Long Halloween, and Anthony Michael Hall will be the Calendar Killer.

jessie monster, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Also, when do we see Robin? Wouldn't it be great if they'd someday come up with a Batman/Robin love story, where Katie Holmes would act as Bruce Wayne's beard?

(x-post)

I think Joker is in the Long Halloween, but he has only a minor part... Maybe in the movie he's responsible for Harvey Dent's fate rather than the mobsters.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

My guess is the newly-mutilated Joker is going on a revenge spree against the mobsters responsible with Bruce and Harvey trying to stop him, and prevent a gang war, with a big ironic finale as Havey gets Two-faced by the same poison that Jokered the Joker.

xp

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I was a bit underwhelmed by The Long Halloween to be honest. Lots of great atmospheres there, but in the end it was just a run-of-the-mill whodunit with a run-of-the-mill twist ending. They should've focused more on Harvey Dent's metamorphosis, which was the most interesting part of the story.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I think of Loeb as second-rate at best, so yeah, I agree.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:58 (sixteen years ago) link

long halloween was not great.

s1ocki, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:01 (sixteen years ago) link

I didn't really get "Arkham Asylum."

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't mean he shouldn't be dark and scary and violent, I'd just rather see him as funny-dark rather tortured-dark.

auhysiogndfpgnf spbnfagufp ghroiagnpwognfhbgfbnigs opbhusdpf h

SO THEN GO WATCH THE IDIOTIC TIM BURTON FILM FOR GOD'S SAKE TUOMAS

or the cartoon series, or the television series from the 60s, or...etc etc!!

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

It's all Jungian and shit. Fuckin' Morrison. (I don't think AA is one of his better works, but I'd take minor Morrison over a Loeb 'masterpiece' anyday.)

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:26 (sixteen years ago) link

i am so so so there for this if aaron eckhart is playing harvey dent tho. i mean i was there for this before that but now i'm 100% on board.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:28 (sixteen years ago) link

Look upthread, Ally.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

wtf do you think i was referring to, ned.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:29 (sixteen years ago) link

u makin me crazy, bro!!

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost Whoa. Now I happen to think that Batman Begins is the best batman movie yet, but let's not get too crazy. Keaton was awesome, and Burton's film was a lot of fun.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:30 (sixteen years ago) link

u makin me crazy, bro!!

It was your use of the word 'if' that threw me! But now I'm imagining a scenario where they cast him, took the promo photos and then told him they were fucking with him.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:32 (sixteen years ago) link

omg that should be casting industry standard procedure.

jessie monster, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:35 (sixteen years ago) link

"Michael Keaton" and "awesome" are only allowed in the same sentence as "Beetlejuice" sorry.

jessie monster, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:36 (sixteen years ago) link

How soon we forget "Jack Frost."

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:38 (sixteen years ago) link

How soon thankfully we forget "Jack Frost."

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

It's all Jungian and shit. Fuckin' Morrison. (I don't think AA is one of his better works, but I'd take minor Morrison over a Loeb 'masterpiece' anyday.)

-- Oilyrags, Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:26 PM (9 minutes ago)

Ya, I got the Jung undertones, I think it was just too much atmosphere and too little comprehensible story for my tastes. I loved the art, but it was too difficult to follow. I suppose I should go back and read Morrison's annotated script in the back.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 16:41 (sixteen years ago) link

AA is a bit of a big mess, but it was one of the first things I remember reading with Morrison's name on it - definitely put him on my radar

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

"Michael Keaton" and "awesome" are only allowed in the same sentence as "Beetlejuice" sorry.

Dear Jessie,

You are wrong.

Sincerely,

Mr Mom

nickalicious, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 19:52 (sixteen years ago) link

MR. MOM (1983)

Plot Keywords:
Child Nudity / Self Discovery

jessie monster, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 19:57 (sixteen years ago) link

i actually liked him as batman

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 20:00 (sixteen years ago) link

I actually liked Arkham Asylum.

Abbott, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

I like it as well! Then again it's one of the few Batman books/stories I actually own/have read, which probably skews my viewpoint on the whole cycle.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 20:07 (sixteen years ago) link

I only have Killing Joke, Year One, and a copy of AA that a friend gave me. Don't feel the need for much else (I can't stand Frank Miller anymore)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 20:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Wouldn't it be great if they'd someday come up with a Batman/Robin love story, where Katie Holmes would act as Bruce Wayne's beard?

No.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

here is how I rank Batman books I own:

Killing Joke > Arkham Asylum > Year One > Long Halloween > Dark Victory

jessie monster, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 20:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I only want to see Robin in a Batman movie if they are going to kill him or if he ends up hating Batman for being the psycho he is.

jessie monster, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 20:20 (sixteen years ago) link

<quote>Wouldn't it be great if they'd someday come up with a Batman/Robin love story, where Katie Holmes would act as Bruce Wayne's beard?

No.

-- HI DERE, Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:19 PM (46 seconds ago) Bookmark Link
</quote>

Oh, I could live with it. Williewonkafy the whole Batman concept til its so silver age it hurts and doesn't really affect perception of the Batnolan movies and it'd be fine.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 20:22 (sixteen years ago) link

See you in December = when the first teaser trailers are released?

Alba, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 21:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I only want to see Robin in a Batman movie if they are going to kill him or if he ends up hating Batman for being the psycho he is.

omg jessie u r soooo wrong the iconic Batman is mortal perfection personified wlomgoltf.

Leee, Tuesday, 22 May 2007 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Are there actually any truly great Batman graphic novels or miniseries besides the Miller ones and Killing Joke? Because most of the ones I've read have been disappointing in one way or another, and I've never had the money or time to follow the monthly books.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 09:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Batman and Judge Dredd Files is a must to own by any fan of Batman comics or otherwise, 3 stories by different writers and artists.

Ste, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 10:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh yeah, I've read the first one of those (with Judge Death and Scarecrow), it was pretty good.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 10:40 (sixteen years ago) link

that was Simon Bisley artwork, which was in my opinion simply breathtaking

Ste, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 10:43 (sixteen years ago) link

So to summarize, Tuomas hates Batman.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:18 (sixteen years ago) link

We already knew this, though.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:18 (sixteen years ago) link

You're not my intended audience.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Leee I will fight you for I Love Comics ownership.

jessie monster, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:25 (sixteen years ago) link

I checked "The Greatest Batman Stories Ever Told" out of the library recently, and despite an inevitable emphasis on one-issue stories, it has a lot of great material in it.

I really dig Matt Wagner's three-parter "Faces" from Legends of the Dark Knight. I think it got reprinted as a tpb. There was another one "Blades" from around the same time with art by Tim Sale and written by James Robinson that was also high quality. Dunno if you can still find that one, though.

Also, the recent "Mad Moon Rising" or whatever it was called thing by Wagner retelling the early Hugo Strange and Mad Monk stories is a lot of fun. Fact is, though, I'm just a Wagner fanboy, so take that as you will.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:32 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh yeah! Also the first Grendel/Batman crossover, the one with Hunter Rose. The later one with Grendelprime kinda sucked.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 14:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Now that I think of it, when it comes to superheroes I've always preferred bright-coloured cosmic fables to dark and edgy vigilante stuff, so I guess I do hate Batman.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

good now get out

s1ocki, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 16:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Bring it if you can, monster jessie.

xpost s1ocki otm.

Leee, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 16:55 (sixteen years ago) link

slocki harsh but fair -- it's like Tuomas is wishing the sky wasn't blue.

Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 16:57 (sixteen years ago) link

tuomas would probably like the batman story in mike allred's solo tho.

s1ocki, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:01 (sixteen years ago) link

yay Matt Wagner

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

If you can find them in the back issue bins, Pete Milligan's Batman one-issues are just as awesome as their titles suggest they might be ("The Executioner Wore Stiletto Heels" and "The Hungry Grass!"). Also, the Wagner/Grant run is bestest -- definitely more "funny dark" than "tortured dark."

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:12 (sixteen years ago) link

i dunno guys tuomas is saying it in a really annoying way as usual but i think hes right that this is some bullshit dark re-imagineered david fincher joker instead of classic funny-yet-crazy joker - do yall also like this?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/62/American_McGee_Alice_box.gif/256px-American_McGee_Alice_box.gif

and what, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:13 (sixteen years ago) link

No one likes American McGee.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

tuomas would probably like the batman story in mike allred's solo tho.

Also sci-fi closet Morrison? There were really only a couple of good issues though.

I like Year 100 but Tuomas wouldn't.

Jordan, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno, I thought the Nolan movie was quite light-hearted in places. It wasn't dark in a "grim 'n gritty" way.

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

classic funny-yet-crazy joker

"classic" is subject to debate, as this thread makes rather obvious. which interpretation a reader/viewer priveleges is entirely up to their own prejudices.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I dunno guys we have two photographs and a totally inconsistent narrative spanning nearly a century involving perhaps hundreds of authors, surely we can nail down the probable levels of genuine intent and fitting nuance mr ledger will bring to the role, and what the script will have in it.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I predict Ledger dances a killer Batusi

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

I hope Ledger's Joker tries to out-do Bale's Batman in a contest of BONERS

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

definitely psyched about the prince song.

s1ocki, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

R. Kelly should do the soundtrack.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 17:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Perhaps snorggirl should play the Joker.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 23 May 2007 18:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Snorggirl? Is that some superhero?

Tuomas, Thursday, 24 May 2007 10:12 (sixteen years ago) link

better if it were Snoggirl

Ste, Thursday, 24 May 2007 10:24 (sixteen years ago) link

genuine intent and fitting nuance mr ledger will bring to the role

I predict Ledger dances a killer Batusi

I hope Ledger's Joker tries to out-do Bale's Batman in a contest of BONERS

Can y'all call him Heath otherwise I get a little taken aback whenever I open the thread.

ledge, Thursday, 24 May 2007 10:26 (sixteen years ago) link

i just realized while watching it again this weekend that while its not my favorite batman movie i think mask of the phantasm has by far the best batman characterization of any of them

and what, Thursday, 24 May 2007 14:53 (sixteen years ago) link

bruce wayne kneeling on his parents grave in the rain begging them to let him not be batman, and you know that hes going to have to anyway, is some tragic shit

and what, Thursday, 24 May 2007 14:54 (sixteen years ago) link

if i could count the times i begged my folks not to be batman...

latebloomer, Sunday, 27 May 2007 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

and yet they insisted on being batman

s1ocki, Sunday, 27 May 2007 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

family outings were no fun at all. mom and dad were always on the lookout for some evildoers to bust.

The big trip to Disney World was a fiasco.

"Dad, the mad hatter is PART OF THE RIDE ffs"

latebloomer, Sunday, 27 May 2007 21:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Should I make my comic-lord brother get me copies of Arkham Asylum, Year One and the Alan Moore collection w/ The Killing Joke for a Batman introduction?

milo z, Monday, 28 May 2007 00:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Yes.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 28 May 2007 00:14 (sixteen years ago) link

obviously

Oilyrags, Monday, 28 May 2007 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

btw dude, I woulda taken you up on that Drink offer if I'd caught it before I called it a night!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 28 May 2007 00:19 (sixteen years ago) link

The world's gin supply is safe for the moment, so there will probably be more opportunities.

Oilyrags, Monday, 28 May 2007 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

http://www.comingsoon.net/images/newbatmansuit.jpg

latebloomer, Friday, 15 June 2007 06:46 (sixteen years ago) link

fuck that robocop shit

chaki, Saturday, 16 June 2007 07:38 (sixteen years ago) link

best batman
http://www.brokenfrontier.com/img/2005/mar/DC/BatmanLegendsOfDarkKnightCv.jpg

chaki, Saturday, 16 June 2007 07:43 (sixteen years ago) link

...is that Moebius?

Rock Hardy, Saturday, 16 June 2007 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

the late Seth Fisher, from his and JH Williams' and D. Curtis Johnson's LOTDK.

energy flash gordon, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Well well:

http://www.latimes.com/media/alternatethumbnails/story/2007-06/30587677.jpg

Story.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 00:06 (sixteen years ago) link

whatever that is i love it

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 00:18 (sixteen years ago) link

ok so they went and decided to top the actual jumping batmobile? that's good news. fuck a CGI.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 00:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Is that the Batvibrator?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 11:19 (sixteen years ago) link

No.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 13:09 (sixteen years ago) link

2nd best Batman

http://www.freegorifero.com/weblog/assets/060226.jpg

Jordan, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 13:14 (sixteen years ago) link

Year 100! I loved that.

So, I finally got around to seeing Batman: Mask of the Phantasm last night. I'm not sure if it's as great as some have hyped it to me, but it's really more solid than a lot of the 90s Batman films and does some interesting rewriting of the Batman origin story including a romantic interest that's scripted more maturely than other film versions, and it's in a cartoon! The whole thing reminded me how great the Batman animated series was.

mh, Tuesday, 19 June 2007 13:20 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

http://video.whysoserious.com/TDK_Teaser_HD_Best_L98hufT.mov

Gukbe, Friday, 27 July 2007 23:02 (sixteen years ago) link

ha, was just about to post that

latebloomer, Saturday, 28 July 2007 00:32 (sixteen years ago) link

SO EXCITED.

Dr. Superman, Saturday, 28 July 2007 04:58 (sixteen years ago) link

youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3DV-uaUkzk

Cunga, Saturday, 28 July 2007 05:12 (sixteen years ago) link

So Heath is doing his Jack impression, I take it.

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Saturday, 28 July 2007 05:27 (sixteen years ago) link

That fucking why so serious link shows an "All audiences" notification that doesn't fit on my screen, then stalls for a year and crashes my browser.

THANKS WARNER BROTHERS! I WUB OO!

Oilyrags, Saturday, 28 July 2007 12:34 (sixteen years ago) link

wow, Ichi The Killer goes full circle

da croupier, Saturday, 28 July 2007 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

PAT LEAHY AS MR FREEZE

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

he did say he has landed a scene with its two stars, Christian Bale and Heath Ledger

He subpeonas them, asks for their private e-mails, gets nowhere, subpeonas them again...

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 16:25 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2007-09/32821514.jpg

*impatient*

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 27 September 2007 01:31 (sixteen years ago) link

I got to see Maggie Gyllenhaal and Aaron Eckhart going to the "opera" a few months ago. My impatience has been sated temporarily.

Deric W. Haircare, Thursday, 27 September 2007 02:15 (sixteen years ago) link

I am watching the Watchmen!

Dr. Superman, Thursday, 27 September 2007 05:54 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.iesb.net/images/zoom/IAGNRE/TDK7.jpg

KA-BOOSH!

Alba, Monday, 1 October 2007 22:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Is the Joker wearing jeans?

Jordan, Monday, 1 October 2007 22:31 (sixteen years ago) link

lookin good

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 1 October 2007 22:32 (sixteen years ago) link

heath ledger sounds like andy dick in the trailer

and what, Monday, 1 October 2007 22:41 (sixteen years ago) link

okay that is MASSIVELY disturbing

HI DERE, Monday, 1 October 2007 22:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Andy Dick and Crispin Glover should make a movie about the Wright Brothers, as they didn't get to be in this.

da croupier, Monday, 1 October 2007 22:44 (sixteen years ago) link

God, I didn't even like the last one that much and I'm dying to see this.

da croupier, Monday, 1 October 2007 22:45 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

I like it.

http://www.joblo.com/newsimages1/jokerempire.jpg

Roz, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 19:26 (sixteen years ago) link

How is my namesake?

ledge, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 22:09 (sixteen years ago) link

Andy Dick and Crispin Glover should make a movie about the Wright Brothers, as they didn't get to be in this.

-- da croupier, Monday, October 1, 2007 10:44 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Link

<3<3<3

latebloomer, Tuesday, 27 November 2007 22:10 (sixteen years ago) link

well Batman Begins ruled (and shit all over all but the Tim Burton Batman. even Batman Returns bites--I liekd it as a kid but god it didn't age well...and it's not that old!)

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoa does this mall get filled w/blue-paint-zombies & bikers???

Abbott, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:08 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.iesb.net/images/zoom/IAGNRE/TDK2.jpg

xtians bale plz contact me w/yr magick stack of wires. you are beautiflu

Abbott, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:10 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.iesb.net/images/zoom/IAGNRE/TDK1.jpg

Omh plz zpsonsor my coming out party

Abbott, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:13 (sixteen years ago) link

I feel like a dumbass for not realizing he was British until a month ago

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:16 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, in a special feature of Newsies DVD he basically says 'why did they think it would be good for me to sing in an affected British accent? I don't know."

Abbott, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:17 (sixteen years ago) link

British Brooklyn accent

Abbott, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:17 (sixteen years ago) link

http://i6.tinypic.com/89sg5z8.gif

gff, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 00:26 (sixteen years ago) link

lol i didn't realize the pic I posted did not come out and now it looks like I'm just saying "I like it" like I've seen it. tis the cover of the latest Empire with Ledger as the Joker on it.

http://www.joblo.com/index.php?id=18776

Roz, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 06:06 (sixteen years ago) link

oh wait now I see it again. gah wtf.

Roz, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 06:07 (sixteen years ago) link

He looks like a member of the Sex Pistols there.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 08:28 (sixteen years ago) link

God, I didn't even like the last one that much and I'm dying to see this.

-- da croupier, Monday, October 1, 2007 3:45 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Link

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 09:23 (sixteen years ago) link

with his fuckin, his fuckin laser eyes, you know

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 10:18 (sixteen years ago) link

lol cover design scarier than joker

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 28 November 2007 10:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Some further PR hash re: six-minute screening of footage the other day

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 December 2007 15:25 (sixteen years ago) link

<img src=http://impawards.com/2008/posters/dark_knight.jpg>;

Meet my new desktop wallpaper.

Oilyrags, Friday, 7 December 2007 03:26 (sixteen years ago) link

http://impawards.com/2008/posters/dark_knight.jpg

Oilyrags, Friday, 7 December 2007 03:26 (sixteen years ago) link

christianbale.gif is way better than Batman Begins

milo z, Friday, 7 December 2007 03:34 (sixteen years ago) link

This is easily my favorite poster design since Hard Candy:

http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/darkknightteaserposter.jpg

Cosmo Vitelli, Saturday, 8 December 2007 00:06 (sixteen years ago) link

exept for the unnecessary "why so serious?"

Cosmo Vitelli, Saturday, 8 December 2007 00:07 (sixteen years ago) link

it's the TAG LINE

jessie monster, Saturday, 8 December 2007 00:22 (sixteen years ago) link

and a SHITTY and UNNECESSARY one

da croupier, Saturday, 8 December 2007 00:31 (sixteen years ago) link

That "The Ha Ha Ha Times" viral website is pretty cool, tho.

Oilyrags, Saturday, 8 December 2007 00:35 (sixteen years ago) link

haha omg that is a terrible tagline!

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 8 December 2007 00:40 (sixteen years ago) link

superman 2: "i know right"

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 8 December 2007 00:41 (sixteen years ago) link

GOT BATMAN?

da croupier, Saturday, 8 December 2007 00:59 (sixteen years ago) link

haha

s1ocki, Saturday, 8 December 2007 01:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Batman Much?

s1ocki, Saturday, 8 December 2007 01:12 (sixteen years ago) link

Bat Me Worry?

latebloomer, Saturday, 8 December 2007 11:58 (sixteen years ago) link

What part of "Batman" don't you understand?

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 8 December 2007 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

prepare for a crimewave: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/7141740.stm

DG, Thursday, 13 December 2007 12:11 (sixteen years ago) link

How do you survive falling into a fucking vat of cyanide, precisely?

In the funny books that's okay, you turn into the Clown Prince of Crime, but in real life..Jeez

Stone Monkey, Thursday, 13 December 2007 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

clearly the tagline should've been "Batman carries on beginning in..." (which, btw, I still can't believe isn't a Raggett thread every single time I see the subject line).

Alex in Baltimore, Thursday, 13 December 2007 18:04 (sixteen years ago) link

Hahahah!

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 13 December 2007 18:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Was this linked?

http://batman-dark-knight.moviechronicles.com/

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Thursday, 13 December 2007 19:52 (sixteen years ago) link

The trailer has leaked:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAW0Bif_2CU

Nathan, Friday, 14 December 2007 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

bateman/batman

i love it, best since keaton (which isn't hard, really)

pc user, Friday, 14 December 2007 21:55 (sixteen years ago) link

http://www.omelete.com.br/imagens/cinema/news/thedarkknight/posterexclusivoomelete.jpg
this poster is all kinds of awesome. it makes me hope that TDK is going to be a Bat-remake of King of New York.

Dr. Superman, Friday, 14 December 2007 22:16 (sixteen years ago) link

I have Batman Begins at home on DVD!!!! Trying to decide on a party to go to tonight, or just stay in and watch??

Laurel, Friday, 14 December 2007 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

well couldn't you just watch it later?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 14 December 2007 22:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I would stay in and watch it, but my other option is to go to work while 95% of my coworkers go to the reportedly amazing xmas party

Dr. Superman, Friday, 14 December 2007 22:34 (sixteen years ago) link

with his fuckin, his fuckin laser eyes, you know

-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:18 AM

what the hell am i talking about

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 15 December 2007 02:11 (sixteen years ago) link

the trailer is now officially out:

http://atasteforthetheatrical.com/deathtrap/default.htm

latebloomer, Monday, 17 December 2007 01:52 (sixteen years ago) link

I am v. happy.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 December 2007 01:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm surprised at how bright and modern Gotham looks, even compared to Batman Begins. That's not a negative thing, it's just...different.

latebloomer, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:00 (sixteen years ago) link

But yeah, I'm uber-excited.

latebloomer, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:02 (sixteen years ago) link

batman 2: electric boogaloo

abanana, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:06 (sixteen years ago) link

This batnerd says: boioioioioioing!

Oilyrags, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:07 (sixteen years ago) link

"Show me show me show me how you do that trick."

http://a230.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/83/l_55343cf917373fbe9b7645919397f4b5.gif

Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:19 (sixteen years ago) link

Heh. Closer to this, I think

http://www.smorty71.com/images/blog/kiss_tourbook.jpg

Oilyrags, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:21 (sixteen years ago) link

I freely believe that Paul Stanley has had some CRRRRAZY NIGHTS looking like that, yes.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:22 (sixteen years ago) link

"Some drunk-ass punk said I looked like the Crow and it was all a fog after that."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:24 (sixteen years ago) link

http://blogs.amctv.com/monsterfest/images/2007/07/10/ichi_killer.gif

Mr. Goodman, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:50 (sixteen years ago) link

Huh. Trailer is pretty okay. They seem to be combining Nicholson's Joker with DeVito's Penguin somehow, maybe with a dash of Hannibal Lecter. I can dig it. Batguy looks more like Tom Cruise in every thing I see.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Mostly Nicholson though. Wow.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 17 December 2007 02:59 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, it's definitely a Nicholson-influenced take but not a clone. I've got no problem with that!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 December 2007 03:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Christopher Nolan's IMDB pic is kind of creepy:

http://ia.imdb.com/media/imdb/01/I/21/07/12m.jpg

Eppy, Monday, 17 December 2007 03:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Sounds like Cesar Romero's j-laugh.

Dr. Superman, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoo! I do kind of feel from that trailer like I've already seen the whole movie, but I'll watch the full-length just to have more time to gaze at Christian Bale.

Laurel, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:12 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't see Nicholson there at all -- whereas Jack's Joker was a sadistic, but ultimately aloof, refined villain whose violence was mediated by henchmen or circus-type gadgetry. THIS Joker seems like the type to actually pop out your eyes with his thumbs.

elmo argonaut, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:30 (sixteen years ago) link

nichelson's joker wanted you to take the toast and put it between your knees

remy bean, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:33 (sixteen years ago) link

also, not sure the characterization is going to hold up for the whole movie, but I'm really impressed at Ledger's transformation as seen here, especially in the physicality & vocal range. that chirpy "like me!" bit gave me a chill.

elmo argonaut, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:36 (sixteen years ago) link

contrast: jack nicholson doing a jack nicholson voice

elmo argonaut, Monday, 17 December 2007 19:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Jack Nicholson is apparently "disgusted" by all of this.

Duane Barry, Monday, 17 December 2007 23:44 (sixteen years ago) link

I am apparently apathetic about what Jack Nicholson thinks of anything. You made "Anger Management," Jacko, and it can't have been for the money at this late stage in the game. Ergo your opinion means precisely shit.

See also: "The Bucket List."

Oilyrags, Monday, 17 December 2007 23:57 (sixteen years ago) link

Anyone seen the trailer? I normally don't like Hollywood-type movies, especially comic book movies. But this -- this looks good.

WhySoSerious?

At first, I thought Ledger was a bad choice for the Joker. I might have been wrong.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 03:16 (sixteen years ago) link

That full length trailer is pretty special - I love Ledger's take on the Joker, it really feels like he is bringing something different to it which is an achievement in itself. Am very much into his weird intonation and emphasis on words eg. "to them, you're just a freeeek". The tech and action side of things looks like it's been given a mighty shot too, terrific looking Batpod etc.

The first 70 minutes or so of Batman Begins was my favourite part of any film that year, so I have high expectations of Nolan this time round. On this basis he may have pulled it off!

Bill A, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 14:22 (sixteen years ago) link

The thing Batman Begins lacked -- despite being a really well-made film -- was a compelling villan at the center of it. The Scarecrow character was great, and very creepy, but there just wasn't enough of him in the film. From this trailer, it appears they've solved that problem.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 14:29 (sixteen years ago) link

There were several lesser villains working in association in Batman Begins -- Raz al Ghul, Dr. Crane / Scarecrow, and Falconi -- but yeah, I'm really interested to see if Ledger's Joker will steal this movie like I think he might.

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 14:41 (sixteen years ago) link

Totally agree about the lack of a compelling villain in BB - it was once the plot creaked into the climax that I felt it lost its way (a bit, still head and shoulders above most other recent comic adaptations).

There's about 6 minutes of the opening heist here:

http://theluis.com/2007/12/video-dark-knight-6-minute-prologe.html

Quality is a bit bob, but the film itself looks *great*. Also has a superb old-school John Carpenter-esque musical theme running in the background, which I hope will make it to the final cut.

Bill A, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 14:53 (sixteen years ago) link

can't... stop... watching... trailer...

joker costume design A+

elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 December 2007 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

Haha. I've watched it too many times, too.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 18 December 2007 19:05 (sixteen years ago) link

http://thedarkknight.warnerbros.com/onesheet.jpg

Telephone thing, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 05:39 (sixteen years ago) link

That is one hell of a poster.

Telephone thing, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 05:40 (sixteen years ago) link

I still don't like the tag line much, but its incorporated a lot better in that poster that the one posted a while back.

The only things I don't like about the trailer are his transportation devices (do they have to be so blocky and unstylish? The car still looks like a charcoal brisquet) and that Bale appears to still be making a raspy "Batman" voice different than his Bruce Wayne voice.

da croupier, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 05:46 (sixteen years ago) link

than the one posted a while back

da croupier, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 05:47 (sixteen years ago) link

Totally with you on raspy voice and vehicles, although my main concern is the bright shiny chi-town standing in for Gotham. R.I.P., Anton Furst.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 06:14 (sixteen years ago) link

people who hate on the nu-batmobile are hella fired.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:17 (sixteen years ago) link

nu-bat vehicles are too compensaty

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:25 (sixteen years ago) link

The Burton Batman movies aren't very good in retrospect but they got the design stuff right. The Batmobile in those two films is still the best screen incarnation to date, IMO.

That said, I think the Nolan Batmobile looks appropriate for what he's doing with these films.

latebloomer, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:40 (sixteen years ago) link

i.e. the utilitarian, quasi-"realistic" approach to Batman

latebloomer, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:45 (sixteen years ago) link

that prologue is so awesomely 70s French heist flick! I'm glad that Nolan has decided that Batman movies can be genre movies other than superhero genre movies.
Also, is Michael Caine the only non-American who doesn't have to fake an accent (though I think he does anyway) in this movie?

Dr. Superman, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:47 (sixteen years ago) link

or was it in the Prestige where Michael Caine tutors Christian Bale in a cockney accent?

Dr. Superman, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:51 (sixteen years ago) link

The Prestige (btw) totally counts as a Batman movie, as does I'm Not There, since it has Bale vs. Ledger.

Dr. Superman, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Totally OTM about heist flicks and genre swapping, all of which I love it in theory. Just miss the atmosphere.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:53 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, but Burton Batflicks were nothing but atmosphere (which is totally a valid reason to love them) and Michelle Pfeiffer ushering me through puberty in 126 minutes.

Dr. Superman, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 07:59 (sixteen years ago) link

That's the only about "Returns" that still holds up.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 08:10 (sixteen years ago) link

Walken's "unlimited poontang" line was the only other reason.

Sparkle Motion, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 08:13 (sixteen years ago) link

those little penguins with rockets were cute

latebloomer, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 09:03 (sixteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

omg new trailer!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=iHufrsP9XMA

latebloomer, Sunday, 6 January 2008 04:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Hahah, nice.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 6 January 2008 04:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh man, I hadn't seen that 6-minute clip until just now. I can barely wait!!

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 6 January 2008 05:01 (sixteen years ago) link

Spoilerish:
http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=21791

chap, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:02 (sixteen years ago) link

Worrisome. The problem with the first movie (as good as it was) is that it lacked a charismatic central villain to chew up scenery. Scarecrow would have been great, but -- apparently like the Joker here -- didn't get enough screentime to be that compelling central antagonist.

Still, the first film was great in spite of this flaw, and the promo for the new one looks even better.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 18 January 2008 17:05 (sixteen years ago) link

Still, as they say in the piece, it's a neat peice of promotional slieght-of-hand. And the last time Bats fought the Joker on the big screen, the resulting film was terribly thinly-plotted.

chap, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, I spelt 'Piece' two different ways there.

chap, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Two-Face is definitely better dramatic story arc fodder - I think its a good call to make him the focus, always loved the character (TLJ's performance/role was just a horrible disservice)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I watched the Burton Batman for the first time in years around xmas. Really charmed me. Almost every line felt like a nonsequitur! Jack Palance hissing anything >>>>>> Tom Wilkinson saying "you've never tasted desperate."

da croupier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

the first Burton movie is so awful. second one is much better

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

For the first half of the movie Batman doesn't really do anything other than flap his cape and harass (but not detain) criminals! Not sure how that's supposed to "stop crime" any more than a street mime does.

Not really a fan of the "utilitarian, quasi-'realistic'" man-in-tights film, but I'm still psyched to see this.

da croupier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

The second has a far more interesting set-up, but it kind of fluffs it in the second half. Wonderful art direction, though (duh, it's Burton).

chap, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:30 (sixteen years ago) link

isn't it totally tragic and fucked up when the penguins put Danny DeVito's body into the frozen lake at the end of Batman Returns?

-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, July 22, 2007 9:41 AM

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Michael Keaton really gives a great performance in the first one. He's such an absent-minded freak in it.

da croupier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

Best pre-Bale Batman, for sure.

chap, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

watched the Burton Batman for the first time in years around xmas. Really charmed me.

I love the reboot a lot, but I also love Burton's first Batman film. It's more comic book-y, but -- for its time, especially -- it was dark and brooding and epic (with some comic relief by Nickelson).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 18 January 2008 17:34 (sixteen years ago) link

Christian Bale doesn't really give the "prancing around in a tight suit with bat ears is the way to stop crime" vibe. Val Kilmer and Adam West are at least inherently ridiculous people.

da croupier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

Maybe not but I love Christian Bale so it's irrelevant.

Laurel, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:37 (sixteen years ago) link

I think he's a pretty weak actor and his accents are getting worse and worse (dude actually claims he makes up a new one for EVERY movie), and yet I'll basically see anything he stars in, as they're almost always interesting movies.

da croupier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

One of the best things about Bale's performance is the way he makes it convincing that everyone wouldn't clock that Wayne is Batman straight away, by playing Wayne as a total buffoon.

xpost
His best performance is still Empire of the Sun.

chap, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

Poll?

Batman Returns
Batman Begins
Batman with Cesar Romero
Batman

All the others.

remy bean, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:39 (sixteen years ago) link

xp No, it's "Treasure Island" with Charlton Heston, but I'll forgive you for not knowing it because I think it was made for American TV.

Laurel, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

but he plays Batman the way a five year old would play the boogieman. "grrr, I'M GONNA EAT YOU! RASP!"

x-post

da croupier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:40 (sixteen years ago) link

(am i the only one who thought/thinks that nicholson's joker was sorta irritating?)

remy bean, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

"Drunken Billionaire Burns Down Own Home" scene is Bale's shining moment in Batman Begins

Nicholson's Joker is awful, just Jack in bad makeup.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

no im totally with you remy

xpost

max, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I'll take Nicholson hamming it up as an absurd baddie (Batman, Departed, Witches Of Eastwick) over Nicholson's "hi, Oscar!" steez.

da croupier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

I really hope Heath Ledger remembers to dance.

da croupier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

BATDANCE!

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

DO THA BATUSI

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

"Drunken Billionaire Burns Down Own Home" scene is Bale's shining moment in Batman Begins

Nicholson's Joker is awful, just Jack in bad makeup.

-- Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, January 18, 2008 5:42 PM

so rite and so rong, respectively

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 18 January 2008 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm still not sure about Ledger, the trailer just feels a little hollow to me. When he chews on a word like "commissioner," I'm not sure if he's camping it up too much or not enough, and I could see his approach to the role wearing thin over the course of a whole movie. But then, the only starring role of his I've ever seen is 10 Things I Hate About You, so I have no idea what he's really capable of anyway (jeez, he really hasn't been in many movies, has he? I mean even for a younger actor).

Alex in Baltimore, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:08 (sixteen years ago) link

I haven't seen 10 Things, but was Heath Ledger in that? Maybe it will come on cable soon.

As completely ridiculous as it was, I really love A Knight's Tale...and specifically his role therein.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:11 (sixteen years ago) link

Paul Bettany's Chaucer is totally the best part of Knight's Tale though.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:28 (sixteen years ago) link

I love me some two-face. I think this strategy is very interesting, and obviously meant to set up a third picture focusing on Jokes.

Oilyrags, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:41 (sixteen years ago) link

heath ledger vs. ryan phillipe vs. hayden christiansen

remy bean, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

who can tell the dif?

remy bean, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:50 (sixteen years ago) link

I can see where you're coming from on the last two, but you seriously don't see the difference between Ledger and them?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:51 (sixteen years ago) link

has Hayden Christiansen been in anything else besides Lucas's CGI wet dreams?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:52 (sixteen years ago) link

shattered glass (great)
life as a house (terrible)
factory girl (okay)
jumper (ehh)

i'm being glib. i like all three of them, actually.

remy bean, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:53 (sixteen years ago) link

You saw Jumper already?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Don't think I've seen Darth Christiansen in anything else. Can he actually act? You can't tell that about anyone who you've only seen in a Lucas film.

chap, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Kinda wanna see

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:55 (sixteen years ago) link

the 'great' up there is just to needle morbs

remy bean, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Jumper looks like it could be fun. Do you think they know it means 'sweater' over here?

chap, Friday, 18 January 2008 18:58 (sixteen years ago) link

"Wanker" title was taken, presumably

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:11 (sixteen years ago) link

by you?

latebloomer, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

:-D

latebloomer, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:37 (sixteen years ago) link

j/k

latebloomer, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:42 (sixteen years ago) link

*rimshot*

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 January 2008 19:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I am glad that they aren't going to invent an origin story for the Joker, because so far they have all been ridiculously stupid.

Viceroy, Saturday, 19 January 2008 03:00 (sixteen years ago) link

"I woke up one day and felt a bit down."

"Yeah, thanks."

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 January 2008 03:04 (sixteen years ago) link

That 6 minute clips starts pretty good but man oh man does the dialogue get LAME at the end.

da croupier, Saturday, 19 January 2008 03:36 (sixteen years ago) link

that's what dialog is for in action movies

Dr. Superman, Saturday, 19 January 2008 04:25 (sixteen years ago) link

anyway, very stoked for MORE ECKHART (which is weird, cuz wasn't the dirty cop in Burton's Batman named Eckhart? who was sorta based on Harvey Bullock? and A. Eckhart is playing a diff bat-character named Harvey, and I can't believe I have retained so much info from when i was 13, yet can't remember a quadratic equation or what it's for?) I only hope it's Thank You For Smoking Eckhart and not No Reservations Eckhart that shows up.
Hopefully Batman Begins 3 will have Clive Owen as Mr. Freeze or Film Freak or Calendar Man or KILLER MOTH (YESSSS)

Dr. Superman, Saturday, 19 January 2008 04:31 (sixteen years ago) link

it's all about the Bookworm

http://www.waswatching.com/archives/bookworm-thumb.jpg

latebloomer, Saturday, 19 January 2008 05:17 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm still kinda irked that billy dee williams never got to play two-face.

LaMonte, Sunday, 20 January 2008 00:14 (sixteen years ago) link

billy dee was hella smart and put in his contract that if someone else got to play harvey dent as two-face they'd have to pay him off.

da croupier, Sunday, 20 January 2008 02:36 (sixteen years ago) link

I wonder if they have to pay him EVERY time somebody else plays Dent! Maybe he's making money off this movie! That would be totally fucking awesome.

da croupier, Sunday, 20 January 2008 02:37 (sixteen years ago) link

^^

latebloomer, Sunday, 20 January 2008 03:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Well, damn.

Damn.

All we'll ever get is a short taste of what Ledger would have been like.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm certain it will still be released.

chap, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link

isn't it already done filming?

Simon H., Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:18 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, principle photography and all was finished. the release won't likely be affected much.

still, just so sad.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I think that's all we were ever going to get, anyway. If that makes you feel any better. It seems like the emotional meat of the movie is going to be Harvey Dent turning into Darth Vader, with Joker as macguffin what keeps things moving.

Dr. Superman, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:20 (sixteen years ago) link

if they're smart and going for the most psychologically interesting characters the third movie will feature Clayface

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:23 (sixteen years ago) link

or THE OUTSIDER
http://www.dccomics.com/media/covers/7255_400x600.jpg

Dr. Superman, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:26 (sixteen years ago) link

Whoa, that's really sad. I can't believe Ledger was only 28(!)... I figured he was close to 40 by the looks of him.

Sparkle Motion, Tuesday, 22 January 2008 23:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Comment from Morgan Freeman [from BBC Heath Ledger tribute page)

"I worked on the same film and I never met him - we were never on the same set. This is as much news to me as anybody and it affects me in the same way"

This really surprised me, but probly not to many movie buff ilxors I guess. So do cast and crews not get together these days and celebrate the final cuts etc?

Ste, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm sure they were both invited to various celebratory events, but maybe they were too busy/jaded to attend.

Alba, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:28 (sixteen years ago) link

heath ledger vs. ryan phillipe vs. hayden christiansen
who can tell the dif?

remy, you def seem like a nice guy, but this is of a piece w/ yr maintaining 10% of all films you see are "great."

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

As opposed to the 90% that aren't? Sounds like a reasonable breakdown to me!

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:46 (sixteen years ago) link

"great" means for the all-time canon, Ned

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, right.

Alba, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:51 (sixteen years ago) link

HAVE A GREEEEAT DAY!

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:54 (sixteen years ago) link

"great" means for the all-time canon, Ned

Your universe, it is strange and wondrous to me.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 16:02 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm curious on a hypothetical level how selling/releasing/watching Heath Ledger play a cartoon homicidal nihilist would play out if his death was a suicide, but I'm really really really glad that it looks like that's not the case.

da croupier, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

film dudes suck

DG, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 16:03 (sixteen years ago) link

I remember reading somewhere that Michael Caine was only on set for 3 days or something. I imagine Freeman, who probably had no fight scenes (but maybe some gadget fx stuff) either, wasn't needed much more than that.

Dr. Superman, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I was thinking "great" as in "large".

HI DERE, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:27 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, like "Hey - Great tits!".

Not "Your tits are for the all-time canon!".

Alba, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:31 (sixteen years ago) link

morgan freeman is totally gay and i never realized this. i have no gaydar.

chaki, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

titty canon

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:32 (sixteen years ago) link

PEW PEW PEW

Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

I wonder what'll happen to Joker in the possible future Batman films? Will they hire someone else to pay him, or will they stop using the character out of respect for Ledger? (Not that I think such respect is necessary.)

Tuomas, Thursday, 24 January 2008 08:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Oh, I didn't even know there was a Crow sequel!

Tuomas, Thursday, 24 January 2008 09:51 (sixteen years ago) link

There were a few.

Stone Monkey, Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Not sure what you mean Tuomas, do you mean future batman films made by the current director? I guess as per what they usually do they'll just never refer to the other villains again, unfortunately. Maybe not?

If you mean future batman films way down the line then yeah I'm sure they'll still cast someone as the joker, batman wouldn't be the same without him.

Ste, Thursday, 24 January 2008 11:28 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

I thought you meant the initial photo at first and was all "Talk about getting into the mindset"

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:25 (sixteen years ago) link

Will Tuomas approve?
In a political context this would politely be called an “unintended consequence.” (Gotham as Baghdad, anyone?) Mr. Nolan doesn’t deny the overtones. “As we looked through the comics, there was this fascinating idea that Batman’s presence in Gotham actually attracts criminals to Gotham, attracts lunacy,” he said. “When you’re dealing with questionable notions like people taking the law into their own hands, you have to really ask, where does that lead? That’s what makes the character so dark, because he expresses a vengeful desire.”

Dr. Superman, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:48 (sixteen years ago) link

somehow I doubt it

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 18:49 (sixteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/9632/jokesea7.gif

carne asada, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 21:41 (sixteen years ago) link

crap, they're changing the character so he can shoot fireballs from his forehead?

latebloomer, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 22:52 (sixteen years ago) link

i am outraged

latebloomer, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 22:56 (sixteen years ago) link

I got a phone call from Jim Gordon yesterday.
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y298/hukl/dknight3.jpg

Dr. Superman, Friday, 4 April 2008 21:03 (sixteen years ago) link

no green hair eh

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 4 April 2008 21:04 (sixteen years ago) link

super-villain hair dye bro

DG, Friday, 4 April 2008 23:19 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm loving the viral campaign that they are running for the movie

youcangoyourownway, Friday, 4 April 2008 23:52 (sixteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

http://bitcast-a.bitgravity.com/firstshowing/darkknightposter-fullbig.jpg

Alba, Friday, 25 April 2008 21:46 (fifteen years ago) link

@ Superman--

It's Chris Nolan's thing that he wears a suit to the set every day. There's probably something about it on his wikipedia page.

antexit, Friday, 25 April 2008 22:11 (fifteen years ago) link

it's sam raimi's thing. unless it's both their things? besuited superhero directors?

s1ocki, Friday, 25 April 2008 22:28 (fifteen years ago) link

For gods sake never let Brian dePalma direct a superhero movie (or did he and did I mercifully forget)?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 April 2008 22:31 (fifteen years ago) link

what makes you say that? (I don't think he has)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 April 2008 22:37 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually Phantom of the Paradise kinda counts, sorta, and that's a good film. That gets him off the hook. (I've been rereading The Devil's Candy and remembering why he annoys me most of the time.)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 April 2008 22:57 (fifteen years ago) link

great book!

s1ocki, Friday, 25 April 2008 23:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh, FANTASTIC book, no question. First read it a couple of years after the events and now at a distance so much of it feels simultaneously just-yesterday and from a weird alien world.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 April 2008 23:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Phantom is good I just wish the music was better. which is odd considering all the other great sdtk work Paul Williams did.

Shakey Mo Collier, Saturday, 26 April 2008 00:09 (fifteen years ago) link

cool poster

latebloomer, Saturday, 26 April 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

shakey?

s1ocki, Saturday, 26 April 2008 19:33 (fifteen years ago) link

hahahahahahahahaha

latebloomer, Saturday, 26 April 2008 19:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Eckhart speaks a bit (some spoilerish stuff in the story, be warned):

"That's right, people don't really know yet," actor Aaron Eckhart said with grin. "I can tell you that, basically, when you look at Two-Face, you should get sick to your stomach. Being the guy under all that, well, that was a lot of fun for me. It's like you would feel if you met someone whose face had pretty much been ripped off or burned off with acid. I can't talk about it beyond that because I don't want to give away too much of the plans by Chris."

...

In the comic books, the wounds come from a splash of acid thrown at the attorney by a gangster on the witness stand, but there are hints that in this film it might be the Joker who is responsible for the scars.

Eckhart won't discuss that, but he did say that the wounds are structurally deeper than in the comics: "There are fans on the Internet who have done artist's versions of what they think it will look like, and I can tell you this: They're thinking small; Chris is going way farther than people think."

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 4 May 2008 07:14 (fifteen years ago) link

isn't there meant to be a new trailer online today?

Gukbe, Sunday, 4 May 2008 08:08 (fifteen years ago) link

This is the new trailer, I think.

I don't know. Still looks good. But The Joker looks less sinister and imposing in this one. Maybe it's unfair to compare it to the first trailer.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 May 2008 11:05 (fifteen years ago) link

SOLID. Can't wait.

Capitaine Jay Vee, Sunday, 4 May 2008 11:23 (fifteen years ago) link

ima see this but not gonna be able to get past the andy dick thing

and what, Sunday, 4 May 2008 14:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I would love to own a little flat in Gotham City. With fire insurance.

Abbott, Sunday, 4 May 2008 18:55 (fifteen years ago) link

ima see this but not gonna be able to get past the andy dick thing

-- and what, Sunday, 4 May 2008 14:01 (4 hours ago) Link

?

latebloomer, Sunday, 4 May 2008 19:00 (fifteen years ago) link

joker sounds like andy dick

and what, Sunday, 4 May 2008 19:24 (fifteen years ago) link

oh ok.

latebloomer, Sunday, 4 May 2008 19:32 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm kinda slow

latebloomer, Sunday, 4 May 2008 19:32 (fifteen years ago) link

andy dick as the joker would have been kind of terrifying.

latebloomer, Sunday, 4 May 2008 19:39 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm not sure if I like these new Batman character designs. In the first movie we had pumpkin-head Batman, and now there's the greasy-haired Juggalo Joker.

Tuomas, Sunday, 4 May 2008 21:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I certainly prefer the dandy Joker.

Tuomas, Sunday, 4 May 2008 21:50 (fifteen years ago) link

greasy-haired Juggalo Joker.

lol

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 May 2008 21:53 (fifteen years ago) link

He's been giving head to some Juggalette, too, given how scattershot its application is.

Abbott, Sunday, 4 May 2008 22:20 (fifteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

Sending Heath out in style, at least:

http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2008/05/joker-banner-(2).jpg

Ned Raggett, Monday, 19 May 2008 16:28 (fifteen years ago) link

This is easily the blockbuster I'm most excited about this year.

chap, Monday, 19 May 2008 16:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Kinda like Andy Dick, but without the over-the-top feyness.

I am SO excited for this movie. So.

B.L.A.M., Saturday, 31 May 2008 16:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, it's really still the only one I'm all opening-night-must-see about over the next couple of months.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 31 May 2008 16:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I will see this. Also, I had no idea Gotham City is supposed to be in New Jersey.

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 14:27 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it's supposed to be further south on the Eastern Seaboard in the comics.

chap, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 14:31 (fifteen years ago) link

is tony starks in this?

Jordan, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 14:32 (fifteen years ago) link

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2a/Gothamlicencesmall.jpg

I'm not an uber comics geek, but weird. I guess it makes sense these days... New Jersey is more "New York City" than New York right now.

burt_stanton, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link

not really feeling this like everybody else

and what, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link

fav joker is mark hamill tho so wtf do i know

and what, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 14:35 (fifteen years ago) link

animated series was great, easily best screen batman

latebloomer, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 14:38 (fifteen years ago) link

mask of the phantasm d-_-b

and what, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 14:39 (fifteen years ago) link

from the Jeffrey Wells blog:

A non-USA exhibition source told me this evening that The Dark Knight's running time has been confirmed at 152 minutes.

HE reader Mgmax has explained the evolution in two lines: "In the 1950s and early '60s we had long, self-important movies about Jesus. In the 21st Century we have long, self-important movies about Batman."

Dr Morbius, Friday, 13 June 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

"And Jesus stayed three days within the Batcave..."

Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 June 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

fuck mgmax, the trailer for this looked incredible

also batman > jesus

deeznuts, Friday, 13 June 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I'll be missing this AND you'll be in hell; everybody wins!

Dr Morbius, Friday, 13 June 2008 17:53 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.challops.com/images/1.gif

omar little, Friday, 13 June 2008 17:59 (fifteen years ago) link

true story: my friend K. is in this, and snuck off set with Gary Oldman to go waterskiing, but a change in shooting plans necessitated Nolan send a helicopter after, to drag them back for a walk-through shot. they arrived on set in their swimsuits, and to punish them Nolan insisted they costume-change in front of everybody. according to K., he has never been more humbled by the shape and girth of an old guy's... equipment.

remy bean, Friday, 13 June 2008 17:59 (fifteen years ago) link

can anyone link to the actual theatrical trailer? the one i saw wasnt this one - http://www.firstshowing.net/2007/12/17/the-dark-knight-full-theatrical-trailer-debuts/

btw has anyone commented on nolan getting all meta w/ the posters/trailers yet WHY SO SERIOUS

deeznuts, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:02 (fifteen years ago) link

latest one i think

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Q8PPh-C9pRU

omar little, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:05 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/thedarkknight/

caek, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:06 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah those are its

so many incredible shots just in the trailers alone, i dont really get how anyone could watch those & not be hyped for this

deeznuts, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:14 (fifteen years ago) link

i like eckhart's line towards the end of trailer #3. it's total FORESHADOWING bullshit but it's good.

omar little, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Jack Nicholson all the way, but at least this Batman is trying to bring the scary back, this years Joker ain't nothing to fuck with. I cannot BELIEVE Aaron Eckhart is two face & I'm chewing my fingernails with the anticipation.
Its not crass to say that because of Heath's tragic death and everything this movie is going to SELL?

VeronaInTheClub, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:31 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah this is the first movie for me in awhile that is truly a MUST-SEE-IN-THEATER type, in a way that IJ & iron man werent

also really not a fan of people being all "hey its a comic book lighten up"; im so sick of the self-aware wink-wink bullshit these kinds of movies all have these days

i dont think heath's passing is gonna be a factor at all btw

deeznuts, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:33 (fifteen years ago) link

also really not a fan of people being all "hey its a comic book lighten up"; im so sick of the self-aware wink-wink bullshit these kinds of movies all have these days

totally agree...all those movies suck so bad, I want some dark, cynical dystopian shit in comix movies...these need to be more alan moore and less jon favreau

I'm mad excited for DK and yeah it is definitely a see-it-in-theaters thing for the first time maybe of the year?

chinchillas they can fit on gorillas, Friday, 13 June 2008 18:37 (fifteen years ago) link

http://io9.com/396896/bruce-waynes-backstory-dateline+style

latebloomer, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 17:49 (fifteen years ago) link

corny but "one rumor involves owning and operating a Brazilian modeling agency" made me lol.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 18:18 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTHw3vLJpbg

Duane Barry, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 10:58 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.gothamcityrail.com/

Least explicable viral promo site yet.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 21:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Those aren't much more explicable, but thanks.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:28 (fifteen years ago) link

GET TO WORK HOOS

BLACK BEYONCE, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:31 (fifteen years ago) link

got about 20 more of these if people want them

BLACK BEYONCE, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:33 (fifteen years ago) link

*crickets*

white celine, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:35 (fifteen years ago) link

travers: 3.5 stars

Simon H., Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:36 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah, seriously. It almost makes me (a giant Batfanboy) feel bad about being so apathetic to the huge amt of work that must have gone into making all these websites for an imaginary city. But not quite.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:38 (fifteen years ago) link

No, they all kind of look like each took about 45 minutes in Microsoft FrontPage.

Abbott, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:41 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.gothampolice.com/imgs/home_05.jpg

Oh man, Gotham is apparently safer than the Boise and El Paso airports!

Abbott, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:42 (fifteen years ago) link

the look of this makes me think they at least have the vibe right: http://www.thehahahatimes.com/

BLACK BEYONCE, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 22:58 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.thegothamtimes.com/page2.htm

take action.
fight back.
eat pizza.

haha.

mark e, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 23:44 (fifteen years ago) link

"No More Unwanted Pets"

Abbott, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 23:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Dark Knight theatrical release will supposedly include Watchmen teaser trailer. Excellent if true!

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 26 June 2008 00:04 (fifteen years ago) link

To their credit, most municipal websites all kind of look like each took about 45 minutes in Microsoft FrontPage, so kudos on that front.

The GCN reports are pretty great (tho I had to watch them in IE, not Firefox).

David R., Thursday, 26 June 2008 00:28 (fifteen years ago) link

http://gcferries.com/

THERE IS A NUMBER AT THE BOTTOM

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Thursday, 26 June 2008 01:06 (fifteen years ago) link

http://hollywood-elsewhere.com/2008/06/oscar_is_ledger.php

...and so it begins.

caek, Friday, 27 June 2008 19:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Most exciting trailer yet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_-NEBvaJHM

chap, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 16:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Peter Travers sez that Ledger deserves a posthumous Oscar nomination.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 16:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Most exciting trailer yet.

Nah. First trailer beats it by a mile, for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is that most of the good lines in the new trailer are recycled from the first trailer (tho I'll grant you the greatness of the "This town is mine now" line when The Joker and Batman are face-to-face, which appears in the new trailer for the first time).

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 1 July 2008 17:21 (fifteen years ago) link

When did the rules on posthumous Oscar noms change? (I guess that's directed to you, jaymc.) I know Peter Finch had to die between being nominated and awarded to do it for Network.

Eric H., Tuesday, 1 July 2008 18:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Nah. First trailer beats it by a mile

I admit I'm heavily influenced by the manipulative use of DRAMATIC MUSIC.

chap, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 18:21 (fifteen years ago) link

I think Finch died just so he could get the Oscar.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 19:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I think its pretty cool that, other than the final shot of the last movie, there hasn't been a lot of "That's the JOKER." "I'm the JOKER." or "My name's The JOKER."

Kind of like a meeting b/t Batsy and an inevitability that doesn't need to be named explicitly.

I am SO f-ing excited for this flick.

B.L.A.M., Tuesday, 1 July 2008 20:07 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah this still looks absolutely astounding to me

deeznuts, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 20:18 (fifteen years ago) link

If it's anything like the previous one, I'm anticipating a juicy ILE debate about it.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 20:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Very true. I appreciate how comics engender such fervent discussions here. Means we all had at least a modicum of fun as kids.

B.L.A.M., Tuesday, 1 July 2008 20:28 (fifteen years ago) link

I can't wait until Morbius sees it.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 20:49 (fifteen years ago) link

I hope Tim Burton sees it and gets Johnny Depp to cut his throat for him.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 21:04 (fifteen years ago) link

...that might be a little harsh.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 21:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Means we all had at least a modicum of fun as kids.

Haha, but probably not much as teenagers.

chap, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 23:37 (fifteen years ago) link

Morbius won't watch this, who are you kiddin Alfred. (Unless Morbz has secret mancrush on Ledger that I don't know about)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 23:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Naw. Jack Twist owns his "heart."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 23:48 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm really excited for it, etc. but am I also the only person who gets disheartened with people's fervid enthusiasm for seeing yet another actor playing the flamboyant psychopath role? The fact Ledger admitted the Malcolm McDowell/Alex influence makes it harder for me to hear people go on about it and wonder how much of this isn't based on typical "live-vicariously-through-the-hip-murderer" fantasy.

Cunga, Wednesday, 2 July 2008 05:05 (fifteen years ago) link

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_movies_blog/2008/07/dark-knight-the.html

first 5 minutes. amaze!!

piscesx, Thursday, 3 July 2008 00:04 (fifteen years ago) link

old news. Catch up!!

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Thursday, 3 July 2008 02:11 (fifteen years ago) link

was Two Face in the comic and supposed to be in the movie or am I thinking of the other Batman graphic novel with Joker and Batman coming back from retirement?

CaptainLorax, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:05 (fifteen years ago) link

This new movie != an adaptation of the Miller comic. (But Two-Face was in The Dark Knight Returns, yes.)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:09 (fifteen years ago) link

In this movie Aaron Eckhart plays the prosecutor Harvey Dent, who will become Two-Face, though I'm not sure how prominently Two-Face will be featured in the movie. He was quite prominent in The Long Halloween, which I think this movie is partially based on.

Tuomas, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:15 (fifteen years ago) link

My guess is Dark Knight will only give us Two-Face's origin story (since in the trailers Eckhart is only shown as Dent, not as Two-Face), and he will be a more prominent villain in the possible future Batman movies.

Tuomas, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:18 (fifteen years ago) link

I seem to recall speculation that Joker was more of a supporting character in this flick and Two-Face was the surprise for opening day. I expect that if that was true say, at new years, a re-edit made for a big difference.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:25 (fifteen years ago) link

iirc, in trad comics lore the Joker instrumental in Dent becoming Two-Face, so it makes sense that this second one would give the spotlight to the Joker and set-up Two-Face for the next movie.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:26 (fifteen years ago) link

Was Two-Face a marquee villian in the Batman comics? My impression was always that the A-List villians for Batman were, in order, The Joker, Penguin, and The Riddler. After that, my impression was that everyone was B-List or below.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:28 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, that's my recollection of the relationship between Joker and Dent too. Maybe some bigger Batman buff can confirm if this is true?

(x-post)

Tuomas, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:28 (fifteen years ago) link

The Riddler didn't become a prominent villain before the 60s TV series, and I don't think he's been very popular in the comics ever since. Two-Face is certainly more of a A List villain.

Tuomas, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:30 (fifteen years ago) link

More than The Riddler? I'm completely out-of-the-loop, apparently.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:31 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it was originally some random jerk who acid-faced Harvey, but later it got retconned to Joker.

edit - yeah, way more than Riddler. Two Face's gimmick is you can never tell what he's going to do, cause of that damn coin. Riddler's gimmick is that he tells you what he's going to do with some mildly clever word play. you tell me which is more resonant.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:32 (fifteen years ago) link

anyone know if Scarecrow will make an appearance? He was never caught in Begins, and i wouldn't mind seeing Cillian Murphy again.

Roz, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:34 (fifteen years ago) link

The problem with The Riddler I think is that he's too close to The Joker. Two-Face is a more interesting villain, because he's basically a good guy turned bad due to the trauma of having his face disfigured, and this good/bad duality in him can be used to a good effect if done by a proper writer.

Tuomas, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, he's an obvious Joker ripoff, only totally defanged.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:40 (fifteen years ago) link

anyone know if Scarecrow will make an appearance? He was never caught in Begins, and i wouldn't mind seeing Cillian Murphy again.

I read someplace that he's in the film, but "if you blink you'll miss him."

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Two-Face has always been a really significant villain for Batman - and its easy to see why he would be attractive for serious treatment, the concept behind him (as with the Joker) is way stronger than the Penguin or the Riddler.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:46 (fifteen years ago) link

(altho I do think that the one thing Burton did well with the Batman franchise was make the Penguin a great, interesting villain with a compelling backstory)

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh, I liked the Burton franchise. I thought M. Keaton was a great choice for Batman (and, these days, unfairly maligned for his work in the role). C. Bale is v. good, too, obv.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:48 (fifteen years ago) link

the Riddler is so goddamned silly, there's no real way you can make him genuinely frightening or compelling. definitely a holdover from campy 60s Batman (which I love, but he wouldn't fit at all into this current incarnation)

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:48 (fifteen years ago) link

I read someplace that he's in the film, but "if you blink you'll miss him."

good enough for me.

re Two-Face: the most interesting aspect of the Two-Face as a villain is really the fact that Dent and Wayne were friends before his disfigurement and eventual fall. The animated series (seriously best batman ever) did really well with this, I hope the movie does as well.

Roz, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Some feel that the Riddler's elevation by the 60s series was never truly deserved, and in recent years he's been treated by some writers as little more than a joke. The 90s cartoon version of the character was great though.

I've never come across any reference to the Joker being responsible for Harvey becoming Two-Face. It's usually attributed to Sal "the Boss" Maroni, a mobster.

Duane Barry, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Robin: (pointing toward the sky) That crazy missile! It wrote two more riddles before it blew up!
Batman: (reading a skywritten message) "What goes up white and comes down yellow and white?"
Robin: An egg!
Batman: (reading another skywritten message) "How do you divide seventeen apples among sixteen people?"
Robin: Make apple sauce!
Batman: (thinking out loud) Apples into applesauce - A unification into one smooth mixture. An egg - nature's perfect container. The container of all our hopes for the future.
Robin: A unification and a container of hope? United World Organization!
Batman: Precisely, Robin! And there's a special meeting of the Security Council today.

the riddler is some bullshit

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

The animated series (seriously best batman ever)

^^^realness

they did an amazing job with Clayface too

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:54 (fifteen years ago) link

I've never come across any reference to the Joker being responsible for Harvey becoming Two-Face. It's usually attributed to Sal "the Boss" Maroni, a mobster.

yeah you know I may have just mixed this up with advance stuff I read about the new movie

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:57 (fifteen years ago) link

I agree with Esq: Joker, Penguin, Riddler are the top 3

the pinefox, Thursday, 3 July 2008 20:59 (fifteen years ago) link

riddler would be way more compelling if he was a murderous sphinx played by will shortz

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 3 July 2008 21:02 (fifteen years ago) link

from wikipedia:

The Riddler's criminal modus operandi is so deeply ingrained into his personality that he is virtually powerless to stop himself from acting it out. He cannot simply kill his opponents when he has the upper hand; he has to put them in a deathtrap to see if he can devise a life and death intellectual challenge that the hero cannot solve and escape. However, unlike many of Batman's themed enemies, Riddler's compulsion is quite flexible, allowing him to commit any crime as long as he can describe it in a riddle or puzzle. He often has two female assistants, named Query and Echo. His name, Edward Nigma, is a pun on the word enigma, which means riddle or mystery (Edward Nigma: E. Nigma).

In his very first appearance, Nigma was depicted as an employee of a carnival who enjoyed cheating his customers out of their money with his bizarre puzzles and mindgames, most of which were rigged in his favor. He soon finds himself longing for greater challenges and thrills, and dons the guise of the Riddler to challenge Batman, whom he believes could possibly be a worthy adversary for him.

Some notable writers, such as Alex Ross and Shane McCarthy, have suggested that the Riddler's compulsion stems from parental abuse that he endured as a child. After scoring high on some important tests in school, his father, unable to grasp the fact that his son was brilliant, beat him out of envy. This, in theory, left him with a strong internal desire to tell the truth, and prove his innocence. This desire manifests itself in the form of his obsession with riddles.

sounds fuckin lame

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 July 2008 21:04 (fifteen years ago) link

The animated series (seriously best batman ever)

I agree. I can't remember all the episodes but I do remember Scarecrow being seriously badass, which left me a bit upset with the last Batman movie because the scarecrow didn't do half the scare tactics he did in the tv show. (he gave batman the fear of heights when he was fighting on a balcony at the top of a stadium (with a bomb), and I think he made people see giant bugs and shit).

Anyone remember the episode where batman is at a graveyard and he gets trapped in some lethal tomb as a trick. And there are like tons of traps in the graveyard. Who was that villain?

Also, the tv show had the stupid villains that were just big tough guys that knew shit. I remember an episode where one of these guys is playing poker with all the great villains. I found the pairing to be quite funny.

CaptainLorax, Thursday, 3 July 2008 21:17 (fifteen years ago) link

they did an amazing job with Clayface too

Who is this Clayface of whom you speak? Is he the D.C. Comics version of Marvel Comic's The Sandman?

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 3 July 2008 21:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Pretty close, yeah. He's got some extra powers, too - chameleon stuff, mainly.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 3 July 2008 21:39 (fifteen years ago) link

this one in particular is who I was thinking of:

The third Clayface, Preston Payne, first appeared in Detective Comics #478. Suffering from hyperpituitarism, Payne works at S.T.A.R. Labs searching for a cure. He obtains a sample of the then-living Matt Hagen's blood, and isolates an enzyme which he introduces into his own bloodstream. Although he is briefly able to shape his own appearance, this effect is short-lived: while on a date, his flesh begins to melt, and when he touches his horrified girlfriend, she completely melts. Payne builds an exoskeleton anti-melting suit to prevent himself from touching anyone, but he learns that he needs to spread his melting contagion onto others to survive (he feels pain if he doesn't melt anyone). During this time his mental health starts to slip as he falls in love with a wax mannequin he names "Helena", (appearing in Batman Annual #11) thinking she is the only woman immune to his touch. After another breakdown, he thinks Helena enjoys watching men "fighting over her" when he battles Batman yet again in front of the wax doll. Although he doesn't give her up, he keeps her in Arkham Asylum, saying "we're both too polite to admit divorce, but she can't live forever".

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 July 2008 22:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Too cheesy for this dark Batman franchise, I think. But I'm not too hopeful about Two-Face, either (Tommy Lee Jones really soured me on that villian).

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 3 July 2008 22:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Anyone remember the episode where batman is at a graveyard and he gets trapped in some lethal tomb as a trick. And there are like tons of traps in the graveyard. Who was that villain?

I'm not sure, but I think you're talking about "The Cape and Cowl Conspiracy", which featured a one-off villain who was good with traps. Adapted from a 70s comic story.

Duane Barry, Thursday, 3 July 2008 22:51 (fifteen years ago) link

thanks

CaptainLorax, Thursday, 3 July 2008 23:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Animated Series was definitely the best until this new series of movies.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 4 July 2008 00:21 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe still

Oilyrags, Friday, 4 July 2008 00:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Clayface is in this?!
I'm way too excited but I'm not so excited that I'm gonna spoil it and watch the first five minutes. Wooh I appreciate that someone has that but I'd rather wait, I think it ruins the anticipation although to be fair, I'm going to watch it for free anyway...

VeronaInTheClub, Friday, 4 July 2008 01:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah Burton did great work with what he had for Batman Returns, it brought it back from the brink a little. I LOVED Walker in that, I think he was miscast tho, he needed to have been placed as a more theatrical villain or someone with more of a development. Penguin was artfully done. Does anyone feel Walken could have been Two-Face?
http://artfiles.art.com/images/-/Michelle-Pfeiffer---Batman-Returns-Photograph-C10038637.jpeg No one's hating on this either...
http://images.google.co.uk/url?q=http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/warner_brothers/batman_returns/christopher_walken/batmanreturnsdvd.jpg&usg=AFQjCNFxIkyE7a0mb5CvfWEPQfCcf4dLMg

VeronaInTheClub, Friday, 4 July 2008 01:09 (fifteen years ago) link

speaking of which, Batman Returns is on Film4 tonight.

Ste, Friday, 4 July 2008 08:34 (fifteen years ago) link

it could have been so much better:

We pan to a beautiful woman: platinum blonde with a huge rack. She is the hottest woman in the world, but she wears glasses because she is also the smartest woman in the world.

czn, Sunday, 6 July 2008 10:18 (fifteen years ago) link

http://img.skitch.com/20080706-pb7dsjcd7n983js8nd6bybdeyg.jpg

czn, Sunday, 6 July 2008 10:21 (fifteen years ago) link

fake btw, but just imagine

czn, Sunday, 6 July 2008 10:22 (fifteen years ago) link

that's funny but c'mon, the joel schumacher batman flicks already happened. doubt bay would make it any worse.

latebloomer, Sunday, 6 July 2008 15:21 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe more explode-y

latebloomer, Sunday, 6 July 2008 15:25 (fifteen years ago) link

An American flag (CGI) flies proudly in the central courtyard.

latebloomer, Sunday, 6 July 2008 15:29 (fifteen years ago) link

An American Flag (CGI) flies proudly in the central courtyard

excellent

xp

Oilyrags, Sunday, 6 July 2008 15:29 (fifteen years ago) link

now i really wish there was an alternate universe video store where i could rent this

latebloomer, Sunday, 6 July 2008 15:30 (fifteen years ago) link

I have my tickets for the BFI IMAX. Good times.

caek, Sunday, 6 July 2008 15:43 (fifteen years ago) link

For the Nolan one, not the Michael Bay one.

caek, Sunday, 6 July 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link

if only ;_;

latebloomer, Sunday, 6 July 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link

batman at imax, holy crap.

why am i not allowed ;_;

ledge, Monday, 7 July 2008 12:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Booked for IMAX at Manc Filmworks, am already in an unseemly state of excitement for this. IMAX hype fuelled here:

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/37285

Bill A, Monday, 7 July 2008 13:28 (fifteen years ago) link

http://weblogs.variety.com/thompsononhollywood/2008/07/dark-knight-rev.html

Finally, I would have preferred to see The Dark Knight in 35 mm, not IMAX. (I will go see it again when it opens July 18.) While the sequences that were shot with giant cameras were stunning at the IMAX venue--especially the deep detailed helicopter shots over Gotham and the amazing car/truck chase filmed in Chicago's freeway tunnels--I found the movie overwhelming. My brain starts to shut down when it gets over-pixillated, and this film goes on for two and a half hours.

I am going to see this after three days in screening rooms watching awful short films at Soho Shorts festival. Big mistake.

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/1163920509-1163875108213.jpg

caek, Monday, 7 July 2008 14:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i have walked into my office today to find an anominous dvd left on my desk labelled 'Batman', ooooh

Ste, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 08:30 (fifteen years ago) link

I got this awesome Dark Knight t-shirt at the weekend!

http://www.frenchconnection.com/stormsites/fcuk/images/products/enlarged/large/56M8M/56M8M_2.jpg

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 08:36 (fifteen years ago) link

leaked two-face origin scene!

latebloomer, Thursday, 10 July 2008 01:42 (fifteen years ago) link

the shot of two-face on the official site is... interesting
http://thedarkknight.warnerbros.com/media/images/tdk-dent.jpg

and what, Thursday, 10 July 2008 02:03 (fifteen years ago) link

wait
http://thedarkknight.warnerbros.com/media/images/tdk-dent.jpg

and what, Thursday, 10 July 2008 02:06 (fifteen years ago) link

tdk-dent.jpg

and what, Thursday, 10 July 2008 02:06 (fifteen years ago) link

u motherfucker

deeznuts, Thursday, 10 July 2008 02:07 (fifteen years ago) link

lol

wilter, Thursday, 10 July 2008 02:08 (fifteen years ago) link

roffle

latebloomer, Thursday, 10 July 2008 02:09 (fifteen years ago) link

<3

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 10 July 2008 02:21 (fifteen years ago) link

http://news.yahoo.com/s/eonline/20080709/en_movies_eo/30c380360188_4d68_93b8_e631a6db4a87

The service says "many" of those 12 a.m. screenings are sold out in cities both expected (New York, the model for Batman's troubled Gotham City) and not (Boise, Idaho; Council Bluffs, Iowa; etc.). MovieTickets.com, another online ticketing service, reported a total of 140 Dark Knight sell-outs as of today.

In a summer led by the $311 million-grossing Iron Man, The Dark Knight has been regarded as the blockbuster to beat. A sequel to Christopher Nolan's hit franchise reboot, Batman Begins, the new movie is receiving ecstatic early reviews—Variety called it "enthralling"—and Oscar buzz for the late Heath Ledger for his performance as the seriously unhinged Joker.

As early as two weeks ago, three weeks before the July 18 debut, Fandango was reporting "dozens" of premiere-night sell-outs. As of 10 a.m. this morning, still a good eight days before B-Day, The Dark Knight was accounting for 51 percent of all tickets sold by the service. At MovieTickets.com, the film was doing more business than six of that company's Top 10 all-time hits, including The Passion of the Christ and the second Star Wars prequel, Attack of the Clones.

Says Hong: "All indicators point to [next Thursday] as a very busy night at theaters across the country."

Bee OK, Thursday, 10 July 2008 06:16 (fifteen years ago) link

when is slock1 seeing this?

Gukbe, Thursday, 10 July 2008 06:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I just won tickets for a July 15 premiere this morning WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Roz, Thursday, 10 July 2008 09:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Not only are several midnight screenings here in Cleveland sold out, the midnight IMAX screening in Columbus is sold out, and the 3:15am IMAX screening nearly is. Yikes.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 10 July 2008 13:15 (fifteen years ago) link

given the other midnight options in Columbus...

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 10 July 2008 13:28 (fifteen years ago) link

Hahaha. Touché.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 10 July 2008 13:35 (fifteen years ago) link

I had the option of seeing it on the 22nd but I'm going to be in another city. Bah.

Alba, Thursday, 10 July 2008 13:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Reuters, YUCK:

Ledger's eerie performance as the Joker has already won him plaudits from international critics and co-stars, making him an unlikely forerunner to posthumously win the Academy Award for best supporting actor next February.

Ledger was nominated in 2006 for an Oscar for best actor for his role as a brooding gay cowboy in "Brokeback Mountain."

"If there's a movement to get him the first posthumous (acting) Oscar since Peter Finch won for 1976's "Network," sign me up," wrote Rolling Stone film critic Peter Travers.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 11 July 2008 17:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Reposting from the ILC thread for the flick, since Morbs wouldn't deign to enter those waters, & he's a big Travers fan (tho that 3rd quote is the real money shot):

David Poland: "This is not a Batman movie... this is a 2008 version of The Untouchables with The Batman as Elliot Ness, The Joker as Al Capone, much better toys, and, it seems, a topper."

Peter Travers: "It's enough to watch Bale chillingly render Batman as a lost warrior, evoking Al Pacino in The Godfather II in his delusion and desolation. It's enough to see Ledger conjure up the anarchy of the Sex Pistols and A Clockwork Orange as he creates a Joker for the ages."

Richard Corliss: "In its rethinking and transcending of a schlock source, The Dark Knight is up there with David Cronenberg's 1986 version of The Fly. It turns pulp into dark poetry."

David R., Friday, 11 July 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Richard Corliss: "In its rethinking and transcending of a schlock source, The Dark Knight is up there with David Cronenberg's 1986 version of The Fly. It turns pulp into dark poetry."

gah I hate this kind of medium-dismissing snobbery (sorry morbz)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 11 July 2008 17:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I read Batman comics as a kid; I like some pulp.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 11 July 2008 17:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Well Batman was initially conceived in, and has most often occupied, the schlockier end of the comic book medium. I don't for a second think this guy grasps there are non-schlocky pockets of said artform, though.

chap, Friday, 11 July 2008 17:56 (fifteen years ago) link

I certainly prefer the better end of the comics medium to the tons and tons of shitty "dark poetry" out there

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 11 July 2008 17:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Could you give some examples along the path of schlocky to non-schlocky comics so I know whether I agree with you or not? My first reaction is that you don't know what you're talking about. (xpost)

Rock Hardy, Friday, 11 July 2008 18:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Sorry, that was a little harsh.

Rock Hardy, Friday, 11 July 2008 18:02 (fifteen years ago) link

non schlocky - Spawn

schlocky - Lynda Barry

Oilyrags, Friday, 11 July 2008 18:23 (fifteen years ago) link

cheap lol

DG, Friday, 11 July 2008 19:18 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/darkknight

Fucking HELL!!

piscesx, Saturday, 12 July 2008 02:58 (fifteen years ago) link

4 reviews say so much.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 12 July 2008 03:02 (fifteen years ago) link

somewhat amusing article from the creator of the 60's "Batman" series

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117988712.html?categoryid=3184&cs=1&nid=2564

latebloomer, Saturday, 12 July 2008 12:59 (fifteen years ago) link

That's actually a great article, just for all the background information on the creation of the series and all that. Dude wrote Papillon, that's all I need to know.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 13 July 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link

And . . . your first lukewarm review.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 14 July 2008 03:08 (fifteen years ago) link

still counted as a "fresh" by rotten tomatoes

latebloomer, Monday, 14 July 2008 03:14 (fifteen years ago) link

This is Batman, not "Hamlet." Call me shallow, but I wish it were a little more fun.

tells me all i need to know

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 14 July 2008 03:20 (fifteen years ago) link

I have a feeling the Newsweek review will be an outlier. Call me crazy.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 14 July 2008 03:29 (fifteen years ago) link

where's that rex reed review of batman begins where he's all "why can't there be nubile young boy wonder sidekick in this?" lol

latebloomer, Monday, 14 July 2008 03:33 (fifteen years ago) link

That's actually a great article, just for all the background information on the creation of the series and all that.

Mar Evanier observes:

Two points of note. One is that he seems to recall that his pilot script, which featured The Joker, was the first one aired. Actually, the first episode that aired featured The Riddler and the second week featured The Penguin. It wasn't until the third week that The Joker showed his white face...and that script was credited to Robert Dozier, son of Exec Producer William Dozier. So something is wrong in his recollection.

Also: The way Semple tells it, he makes it sound as if ABC forced Batman on Bill Dozier as a project he neither initiated nor wanted to do. Dozier used to tell the story of how he came across a Batman comic book in an airport gift shop and that's how he got the idea to do the show. I seem to recall that in one telling, Dozier even described the issue in question well enough that guys like me could identify it was Batman #171 — which featured The Riddler and which contained story elements that turned up in Semple's script for the first episode aired.

I'm pretty sure Semple's right about all the other stuff but those two matters have me a little puzzled.

energy flash gordon, Monday, 14 July 2008 04:29 (fifteen years ago) link

First negative review:

http://nymag.com/listings/movie/the-dark-knight/

Forget Gotham City—or Anton Furst’s splendid Gothic Gotham of Tim Burton’s Batman, which summoned up the freaky superhero’s inner landscape of vaulted arches and gargoyles. We’re now in a modern, untransformed Manhattan, where the Joker’s opening bank heist unfolds in a tense, realistic style with multiple point-blank shootings. It’s a shock—and very effective—to see a comic-book villain come on like a Quentin Tarantino reservoir dog. But then the novelty wears off and the lack of imagination, visual and otherwise, turns into a drag. The Dark Knight is noisy, jumbled, and sadistic. Even its most wondrous vision—Batman’s plunges from skyscrapers, bat-wings snapping open as he glides through the night like a human kite—can’t keep the movie airborne. There’s an anvil attached to that cape.

Cunga, Monday, 14 July 2008 06:14 (fifteen years ago) link

So far these negative/middling reviews just have me all the more interested!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 July 2008 06:20 (fifteen years ago) link

We’re now in a modern, untransformed Manhattan

well is it manhattan or is it chicago?!?!

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 14 July 2008 06:35 (fifteen years ago) link

filmed in chicago, l.a., hong kong, etc. apparently everywhere but manhattan (according to the imdb)

omar little, Monday, 14 July 2008 06:36 (fifteen years ago) link

i always thought "gotham" was chicago and "metropolis" was n.y. but maybe i have it backwards?

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 14 July 2008 06:38 (fifteen years ago) link

it looks like i do have it backwards!

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 14 July 2008 06:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Rewatched Batman Begins last night - now very clearly obvious that, good as it is, it's JUST a warm-up for this.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 14 July 2008 09:05 (fifteen years ago) link

And yes, these two 'negative' reviews seem to be irritated by things I see as positives.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 14 July 2008 09:08 (fifteen years ago) link

First negative review

The Anne Thompson piece in Variety linked to by caek a week ago is kind of negative too.

Alba, Monday, 14 July 2008 09:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Denby:

Instead of enjoying the formalized beauty of a fighting discipline, we see a lot of flailing movement and bodies hitting the floor like grain sacks. All this ruckus is accompanied by pounding thuds on the soundtrack, with two veteran Hollywood composers (Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard) providing additional bass-heavy stomps in every scene, even when nothing is going on. At times, the movie sounds like two excited mattresses making love in an echo chamber. In brief, Warner Bros. has continued to drain the poetry, fantasy, and comedy out of Tim Burton’s original conception for “Batman” (1989), completing the job of coarsening the material into hyperviolent summer action spectacle. Yet “The Dark Knight” is hardly routine—it has a kicky sadism in scene after scene, which keeps you on edge and sends you out onto the street with post-movie stress disorder. And it has one startling and artful element: the sinister and frightening performance of the late Heath Ledger as the psychopathic murderer the Joker. That part of the movie is upsetting to watch, and, in retrospect, both painful and stirring to think about.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 14 July 2008 12:14 (fifteen years ago) link

So, uh, was trying to get tickets to see this on the IMAX screen here in Chicago... but apparently every showing for the entire run is already sold out.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 14 July 2008 12:52 (fifteen years ago) link

"Tim Burton’s original conception"

Pancakes Hackman, Monday, 14 July 2008 13:57 (fifteen years ago) link

I think these reviewers need to come to terms with the fact that well-established comic book characters, and even some less-than-well-established characters, are the modern day's mythology. The manner in which you cast, paint and tell a myth depends on what you want to express through the telling.

Burton's muse was slightly different than Nolan's, to be sure. I can't fucking wait to see this movie.

B.L.A.M., Monday, 14 July 2008 14:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Right – Denby (and others) are quibbling with Nolan's conceptions.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 14 July 2008 14:58 (fifteen years ago) link

"Tim Burton’s original conception"

-- Pancakes Hackman, Monday, 14 July 2008 13:57 (1 hour ago) Link

^ this

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:30 (fifteen years ago) link

i tried to watch the 1989 batman a few years ago and i couldn't get through it.

omar little, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:38 (fifteen years ago) link

fuck david denby, pretty much

goole, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:39 (fifteen years ago) link

xp: You won't be able to get through this one in 20 years either, if you're lucky.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:40 (fifteen years ago) link

you saw?

omar little, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:43 (fifteen years ago) link

He doesn't need to see it!

Oilyrags, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:43 (fifteen years ago) link

I kind of want to buy the Burton Batman on DVD but I have a dreadful feeling that I'd hate it now. I've got the animated series to watch which will hopefully gimme a decent Batman fix.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link

He doesn't need to see it!

that's our morbs! http://www.booleansoup.com/images/emoticons/eyeroll.gif

omar little, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link

I bought the Batman box set that was out a few years ago. Some of the Burton stuff still works, some doesn't, there's some atrocious editing and the plot in the first one is still a bit wispy. Keaton better than I remember. And the shields on the Batmobile are hand-drawn animation! As is Joker falling to his death! (WHOOPS SPOILERS)

"Batman: Gotham Knight" has some really, really good stuff. For all of Marvel's box office success lately, DC owns the animation ground.

Pancakes Hackman, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link

i always thought "gotham" was chicago and "metropolis" was n.y. but maybe i have it backwards?

-- moonship journey to baja, Monday, July 14, 2008 6:38 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Link

it looks like i do have it backwards!

-- moonship journey to baja, Monday, July 14, 2008 6:40 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Link

!!! i have always assumed same all my assumptions have been upbraided

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 14 July 2008 17:28 (fifteen years ago) link

gotham has been a nyc nickname for 200 years or something, right?

omar little, Monday, 14 July 2008 17:31 (fifteen years ago) link

The origins of 'Gotham' as a nickname.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 July 2008 17:34 (fifteen years ago) link

actually wait i thought both were ny

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 14 July 2008 17:36 (fifteen years ago) link

So, uh, was trying to get tickets to see this on the IMAX screen here in Chicago... but apparently every showing for the entire run is already sold out.

-- jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, July 14, 2008 7:52 AM (Monday, July 14, 2008 7:52 AM) Bookmark Link

dang, was gonna look into this after lunch today. i want to see them blow up the brachs candy factory on the big big screen.

chicago kevin, Monday, 14 July 2008 17:36 (fifteen years ago) link

fwiw i thought metropolis was supposed to be located on the eastern seaboard circa annapolis?? though the daily planet building from the original supes t.v. show is located in providence, ri

elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 July 2008 17:37 (fifteen years ago) link

I forget who said it - Julie Schwartz or someone probably - "Metropolis is NYC in the daytime, Gotham City is NYC at night."

Oilyrags, Monday, 14 July 2008 17:37 (fifteen years ago) link

jvc, i just went to the imax @ navy pier website and there are still tix available for opening weekend (though only the 3 and 6 am showings) and tickets for ALL showings the next weekend.

chicago kevin, Monday, 14 July 2008 17:39 (fifteen years ago) link

No spoilers and I guess I don't even have to say it but this movie ROCKED. Heath Ledger, dammmmnnn. I don't know about Oscar-worthy, but it was something-worthy alright.

Roz, Tuesday, 15 July 2008 17:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Big gripe, same as the last movie: music was awful.

And please if you can, see it on an Imax screen. I saw it on a regular screen and it was disorienting enough, I can't imagine how unsettling it must be on Imax.

Roz, Tuesday, 15 July 2008 18:00 (fifteen years ago) link

metropolis is toronto

and what, Tuesday, 15 July 2008 18:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Holy Crap!

latebloomer, Tuesday, 15 July 2008 18:46 (fifteen years ago) link

jvc, i just went to the imax @ navy pier website and there are still tix available for opening weekend (though only the 3 and 6 am showings) and tickets for ALL showings the next weekend.

Yeah, we found this out yesterday when my wife stopped by after work. The moron I talked to over the weekend just had no clue, and their website was down.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 15 July 2008 20:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I have two tickets to a preview screening (in the UK) next Wednesday night. EXCITED.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 06:42 (fifteen years ago) link

So excited that over the last four days I've watched Batman Begins, Gotham Knight, and seven episodes of the animated series first season.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 06:42 (fifteen years ago) link

I've got an advance ticket for this at the IMAX on Thursday night...

Eazy, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 06:47 (fifteen years ago) link

What's the deal with preview screenings? I don't understand how it can be so easy to get in to see a film before its general release?

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 07:47 (fifteen years ago) link

If you so much as walk aimlessly around certain malls (especially in big cities) there will be people who are giving out, if not actively harassing you to take, free screening passes. The last two movies I was directly offered passes to I turned down and they both, ironically, were gigantic hits (Borat and Knocked Up).

Cunga, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 07:53 (fifteen years ago) link

If you register at seefilmfirst, you'll get emails offering you tickets for preview screenings. It works on a first come first serve basis though, so there's no guarantee that you'll actually get a seat even if you've got a ticket. I've seen loads of pretty good films this way though.

nate woolls, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 08:00 (fifteen years ago) link

list and map of chicago shooting locations for the dark knight.

chicago kevin, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:27 (fifteen years ago) link

this one is my favorite because they blew up the fucking parking garage (kitted to look like a hospital in the movie i think) and didn't tell any of the neighbors. the explosion and 10 story fireball scared the hell out of much of the west side.

chicago kevin, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:29 (fifteen years ago) link

What's the deal with preview screenings?

I have a Visa credit card and received some rewards-type e-mail last week offering free advance tickets. I hope they're for real and that I won't return home to find my apartment ransacked.

Eazy, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:30 (fifteen years ago) link

Kenneth Turan approves.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:39 (fifteen years ago) link

(Though he somehow forgets that the 'next film' Nolan did was The Prestige.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, a soundtrack review.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Armond let'er rip:

Aaron Eckhart’s cop role in The Black Dahlia humanized the complexity of crime and morality. But as Harvey Dent, sorrow transforms him into the vengeful Two-Face, another Armageddon freak in Nolan’s sideshow. The idea is that Dent proves heroism is improbable or unlikely in this life. Dent says, “You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become a villain.” What kind of crap is that to teach our children, or swallow ourselves? Such illogic sums up hipster nihilism, just like Herzog’s Encounters at the End of the World. Putting that crap in a Batman movie panders to the naiveté of those who have not outgrown the moral simplifications of old comics but relish cynicism as smartness. That’s the point of The Joker telling Batman, “You complete me.” Tim Burton might have ridiculed that Jerry Maguire canard, but Nolan means it—his hero is as sick as his villain.

Man’s struggle to be good isn’t news. The difficulty only scares children—which was the original, sophisticated point of Jack Nicholson’s ’89 Joker. Nicholson’s disfigurement abstracted psychosis, being sufficiently hideous without confusing our sympathy. Ledger’s Joker (sweaty clown’s make-up to cover his Black Dahlia–style facial scar) descends from the serial killer clichés of Hannibal Lecter and Anton Chigurh—fashionable icons of modern irrational fear. The Joker’s escalation of urban chaos and destruction is accompanied by booming sound effects and sirens—to spook excitable kids. Ledger’s already-overrated performance consists of a Ratso Rizzo voice and lots of lip-licking. But how great of an actor was Ledger to accept this trite material in the first place?

Unlike Nicholson’s multileveled characterization, Ledger reduces The Joker to one-note ham-acting and trite symbolism. If you fell for the evil-versus-evil antagonism of There Will Be Blood, then The Dark Knight should be the movie of your wretched dreams. Nolan’s unvaried direction drives home the depressing similarities between Batman and his nemeses. Nolan’s single trick is to torment viewers with relentless action montages; distracting ellipses that create narrative frustration and paranoia. Delayed resolution. Fake tension. Such effects used to be called cheap. Cheap like The Joker’s psychobabble: “Madness, as you know, is like gravity—all it takes is a little push.” The Dark Knight is the sentinel of our cultural abyss. All it takes is a push.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:41 (fifteen years ago) link

But is it art?

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:41 (fifteen years ago) link

didn't see that coming

omar little, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Wait, hold on:

Unlike Nicholson’s multileveled characterization

This phrase should not exist.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:43 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^^for realz. that sentence is completely backwards.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:44 (fifteen years ago) link

why does Armond have a job?

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Denby and now White - I'm beginning to wish Pauline Kael had never been born.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:48 (fifteen years ago) link

major lolz

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v216/sexymollusk/ironicnotfunny/whitelolz.jpg

latebloomer, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:56 (fifteen years ago) link

I had no idea Armond White was an old bald black guy. for some reason I had this mental picture of him as stereotypical ivory-tower-living old white liberal dude.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 22:08 (fifteen years ago) link

That graphic is hilarious...and White's blurb is the best written.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 22:11 (fifteen years ago) link

i know, so many levels of funny

latebloomer, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 22:18 (fifteen years ago) link

That graphic is hilarious...and White's blurb is the best written.

sad but true

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 22:22 (fifteen years ago) link

I need to tell heave ho about Victoria Alexander

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 22:49 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't know. I'm totally anxious to see this, and I'm not often interested in big-budget Hollywood movies. But I wonder when I read praise like this:

This film, and to a lesser degree “Iron Man,” redefine the possibilities of the “comic-book movie.”

“The Dark Knight” is not a simplistic tale of good and evil. Batman is good, yes, The Joker is evil, yes. But Batman poses a more complex puzzle than usual: The citizens of Gotham City are in an uproar, calling him a vigilante and blaming him for the deaths of policemen and others. And the Joker is more than a villain. He’s a Mephistopheles whose actions are fiendishly designed to pose moral dilemmas for his enemies.

Roger Ebert's Review. I've read this over-and-over in other reviews. But none of this is new. It's the same key conflict at the heart of a lot of comic-book movies, e.g., the first Batman franchise; Spiderman. The hero is often a haunted vigilante who teeters on the edge of good and evil; The villian often is a rouge monster who challenges the hero's (self-)identity as virtuous. There's more to Ebert's review, to be sure (including a lengthy discussion of what looks like the best thing about the movie: It's hypercool feel and Ledger's performance), but there's something that rings hollow about all the reviews saying that the plotline and the characters' internal struggles "raise the bar" for comic book movies.

Anyone seen it yet? Is there something to this notion that the movie takes "comic book films" to a newer, deeper place?

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:03 (fifteen years ago) link

“Batman” isn’t a comic book anymore.

RUH ROH!!!!

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:05 (fifteen years ago) link

plainly i think cinema >>> comic books, & heres why: the plot points can be the same, or complexified, whatever, but theres no doubt in my mind that movies can engender stronger emotional responses when done properly/perfectly than a fucking comic book can, theyre frankly far more complex in a great way: youve got the potential for sound/text/image/movement/triggers in the form of actors - if these things are combined well you get something far greater than a comic book

thats why i think you guys arguing film critics suggesting this is superior to comix are being pretentious are being dumb- i personally believe theyre right, but theres every reason for those specific people to say that as well

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:13 (fifteen years ago) link

“Batman” isn’t a comic book anymore.

RUH ROH!!!!

But that kind of comment is everywhere: NY Daily News ("this new Batman action-drama - 'action-adventure' is too slight a description - marks the moment superhero movies turned serious"); Seattle Post Intelligencer ("With The Dark Knight, the cinematic superhero spectacle comes closest to becoming modern myth, a pulp tragedy with costumed players and elevated stakes and terrible sacrifices"); Miami Herald ("Nolan, who co-wrote the screenplay with his brother Jonathan, uses the story to explore the nature of heroism and the futility of playing by the rules in a world that has no use for them. In The Dark Knight, doing the right and proper thing often backfires on the good guys, and it's the extremes to which Nolan pushes this idea that gives the film its subversive streak. By downplaying the fantastical elements of the scenario -- Gotham City has never looked this much like a real city, with practically no computer-generated embellishments -- the filmmakers give The Dark Knight an urgency and gravity that is uncommon to comic-book pictures"); many others.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Not sure who you're directing your last comment to, but FWIW, I agree: Movies have a much stronger emotional pull (for me) than comic-books ever could.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:16 (fifteen years ago) link

i know it is - i agree w/ it, im just saying im looking forward to this debate xp

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:17 (fifteen years ago) link

that says less about the film's quality and more about critics' usual inability to convey something without saying the same shit everyone else us imo

omar little, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:17 (fifteen years ago) link

daniel i cant remember if you were involved or not but i accidently got involved in some debate on ILC about this stuff

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:18 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm guessing this film is great but it's probably just because it does this particular shit a lot better than other previous films have in a different way, rather than doing anything different with the story itself if that makes sense.

omar little, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Anyone seen it yet? Is there something to this notion that the movie takes "comic book films" to a newer, deeper place?

without having seen it but having seen the previews im gonna say yes, & that it has little to do with the plot

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:19 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah im totally agreed w/ you omar

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:19 (fifteen years ago) link

And, to reiterate, I'm totally into seeing this film. But only because it looks very cool, well-made, and the marketing campaign has been extremely good. I'm not sure how Ledger's death impacts my interest in seeing the film, if at all (morbid, I know; just being honest).

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Rene Rodriguez of The Miami Herald's review describes a comic book adaptation I don't wanna see.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:24 (fifteen years ago) link

right, because this is primarily a comic book adaptation

get real peoples

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:26 (fifteen years ago) link

Apparently lots of film critics didn't get the memo that you can treat comics seriously. deeznuts you do not have to respond to every post.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:36 (fifteen years ago) link

ok hoos! i will choose to say nothing about your idiotic post because thatd only be fair

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:39 (fifteen years ago) link

"primarily"

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:39 (fifteen years ago) link

oh youre right, knowledgeable filmgoers will read it ONLY as a comic book adaptation, & judge it on these merits

the rest are fucktards who should be ignored

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:41 (fifteen years ago) link

twelve 10/10 reviews on that metacritic link up there. jeepers!

piscesx, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:49 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.progets.com/simpsons/pics/the%20comic%20book%20guy%20pondering.gif
twelve 10/10 reviews on metacritic is suspect

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 00:51 (fifteen years ago) link

thats why i think you guys arguing film critics suggesting this is superior to comix are being pretentious are being dumb

I think, if you weren't so busy trying to be right (and failing, btw), you'd realize that all art forms can do things unique to themselves, and that these differences don't intrinsically make one or the other better, unless you're expecting sound from a book, or pictures from a novel.

But that's not even the issue. The issue is these film critic dopes saying that TDK "redeems" SUPER HERO comic books, brings them kicking and screaming into adulthood, and most folks are having an issue w/ critics getting on their high horse proclaiming this shit, as if 1) the stuff that these critics are responding to in TDK never existed in the genre before, and 2) as if SUPER HERO books need to be "serious" in order to be considered worthy of guilt-free praise.

David R., Thursday, 17 July 2008 01:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Tho I'm probably off-base, conflating SUPER HERO w/ SUPER HERO MOVIE.

David R., Thursday, 17 July 2008 01:24 (fifteen years ago) link

It seems that after you hear people make the "comic books are art/myths" arguments it is soon followed by some critics actually judging the movies like they're high-art, dismissing them, and the original comic-book lovers getting upset that they're taking the films too seriously. You can't win.

And am I the only one here who finds Bale's Bruce Wayne too dull?

Cunga, Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:11 (fifteen years ago) link

I sort of prefer Michael Keaton's take on the role, but I'm sure I am the only one who feels that way.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:17 (fifteen years ago) link

You aren't. Bale's embarrassing. I mean, I'd rather have sex with him; or maybe his hair.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:26 (fifteen years ago) link

My wife's totally, utterly in love with Christian Bale. So I hate him.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:27 (fifteen years ago) link

(j/k; I don't hate him. I just think Keaton's better in the role, but he's a relic of his era, and Bale makes more sense now, obv.)

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:27 (fifteen years ago) link

I like Keaton's Bruce better as well. It only occurred to me on my second viewing that Bale didn't mean to make Bruce look like such an unconvincing playboy.

Frankly, all the protagonists of Nolan movies I've seen are rather bland and uninteresting outside of the predicament they're in for the film. The motivation of the female characters (Moss in Memento, Johansson in Prestige, Holmes in BB) also tend to be murky. I can't get into why without spoiling the first two and I don't think I need to exhume any discussion on Katie Holmes in BB.

Cunga, Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:53 (fifteen years ago) link

You aren't. Bale's embarrassing. I mean, I'd rather have sex with him; or maybe his hair.

-- Alfred, Lord Sotosyn

so lou gehrig's disease basically admits hes trolling this thread

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 02:57 (fifteen years ago) link

get this tattooed on your forehead homie:

deeznuts you do not have to respond to every post.

-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:36 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

J0rdan S., Thursday, 17 July 2008 03:19 (fifteen years ago) link

I liked Bale in BB but he is out-acted by pretty much everyone in TDK except for gyllenhaal, and only because her character isn't given much to do. The guy can brood with the best of them and his billionaire-brat act is fine but his Bruce Wayne is a personality-free blank.

Roz, Thursday, 17 July 2008 06:54 (fifteen years ago) link

everything about the advance press/publicity for this movie seems to want to pummel me with its hard-won Seriousness, signaled by violence, literal darkness, limited color palette, people speaking in low tones, and the record-breaking misanthropy of the villain. seems really tiresome to me. i have a bad feeling, and not only because i found the first nolan batman boring as shit.

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 07:30 (fifteen years ago) link

I think this is way less boring than BB. "Seriousness" aside (it is or at least, attempts to be, more serious than BB), it works better than BB as a action-thriller. No more weapons-testing or training bullshit to get through and besides, there's less of a focus on Wayne/Batman and a lot more on the tension between Batman/cops/lawyers/mob bosses/Joker/mayor which puts most of the action in motion.

Roz, Thursday, 17 July 2008 08:13 (fifteen years ago) link

I wanna know who had the genius idea of casting Nestor Carbonell in a Batman movie because I had to resist the urge to giggle and yell "I am... BATMANUEL!!" everytime he was on-screen.

Roz, Thursday, 17 July 2008 08:23 (fifteen years ago) link

Surely the deep significance of the "brings comic books to a new level" cliché is that it gives people writing this stuff an out from having to say "this is a movie about a man dressed as a bat punching things and i liked it because i have not grown up on some level"

thomp, Thursday, 17 July 2008 08:59 (fifteen years ago) link

yea this kind of thing has already been repeated countless times wrt Spidey, BB, V for Vendetta, etc - it's getting real old and doesn't really mean anything much anymore. imo film reviewers are lazy and saying that a film transcends its roots is just their way of saying "This is a fucking awesome movie."

Superhero movies by necessity needs the cheap thrills and spills - can you imagine one where the hero sits around in their tights and have long, intense conversations about morality or the limits and ethics of vigilantism? (lol someone make this happen). Really the only question is whether a particular superhero movie delivers or not is whether it gives the audience more than standard "good guy meets bad guy, they fight, some shit get blown up, good guy wins" plot and manages to capture some of the nuanced storytelling that comic-book fans already know the genre is capable of.

Roz, Thursday, 17 July 2008 09:09 (fifteen years ago) link

i hear the next movie in the franchise will be directed by pedro costa

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 09:15 (fifteen years ago) link

well one of the repeated uh tropes of the current crop of superhero movies is that they signpost their MORAL COMPLEXITY at some point and then find a resolution, because it has to involve someone in a cape / leathers / mechanical exoskeleton punching things, that involves either total handwaving denial or a slide into incoherence.

as some people on thread may know the whole OOOH LOOK ITS SO DARK, ITS MORALLY COMPLEX AND PEOPLE GET SHOT aesthetic is one that people have been having arguments over viz. comic books for twenty years or so now, actually. "grim and gritty" is largely recognised as cliché at best, travesty at worst.

as for "movies are intrinsically more creative and just plain better than other media" bullshit i have been hearing that from philistines since i was fourteen and it can GTFO tbh.

xpost who? /:

thomp, Thursday, 17 July 2008 09:16 (fifteen years ago) link

was looking forward to this then heard "punk rock joker" come out of bale's mouth.

Ronan, Thursday, 17 July 2008 09:39 (fifteen years ago) link

haha amateurist.

"grim and gritty" is largely recognised as cliché at best, travesty at worst.

well yeah. But I think TDK works because it's so focused in what in wants to say. take-away the signposting (the Bat-voice, the darkness, and yes, the somewhat trite mantras) and what you still get is a movie about the difficulty of being a crime-fighter in a batsuit unbound to rules and laws.... when trying to do good things, you get in the way of other people like lawyers and cops who are also trying to do good things and they in turn get in your way. and worse, you push the bad guys to see how far they can go.

but.. I'm a comics dilettante at best and even I know this isn't saying anything really new. I'm more inclined to agree with omar upthread that TDK works because it tells this story well, which is frankly more than you could ask for in a 2-hour plus superhero movie. Does this mean it "transcends the genre"... I'm not so sure.

Roz, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:08 (fifteen years ago) link

focused in what IT wants to say.**

Roz, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:09 (fifteen years ago) link

oh i am almost certainly going to see this, after wall-e it's my second most looked forward to big budget thing of the year. trailers i have seen make it look three or four times more camp than i was expecting already, though.

thomp, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:18 (fifteen years ago) link

the films inevitably come down hard on the side of vigilantism though (largely by the requirements of the genre--this is equally true of the so-called "adult" batman revisions by alan moore and frank miller), so i feel like the vaunted seriousness and self-consciousness are typically just window dressing.

i'd like to see a pixar batman more than the self-serious murk this film seems to be promising (sure, sure, it's possible i'll end up liking it more than i expect).

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:22 (fifteen years ago) link

XPOST

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:22 (fifteen years ago) link

good method to watch TDK, everytime a character says something in low pensive tones, yell "WHY. SO. SERIOUS?!" at the screen.

Roz, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:37 (fifteen years ago) link

i was excited for this movie about a year or so ago, now meh.

Ste, Thursday, 17 July 2008 10:41 (fifteen years ago) link

"i'd like to see a pixar batman more than the self-serious murk this film seems to be promising"

ugh

im sure you guys are all very happy you werent pulp novel nerds in the 1940s

"these hollywood directors & critics just dont understaaaaaaaaaand, man!"

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 11:34 (fifteen years ago) link

huh? did i say anything about comic books?

amateurist, Thursday, 17 July 2008 11:37 (fifteen years ago) link

there are two equally stupid arguments against this film being made on this thread & sometimes i conflate them

a)not true to its source/not better than its source
b)not enough ironic distance for me to be comfortable with it
(c) film critics really like it)

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 11:41 (fifteen years ago) link

as some people on thread may know the whole OOOH LOOK ITS SO DARK, ITS MORALLY COMPLEX AND PEOPLE GET SHOT aesthetic is one that people have been having arguments over viz. crime novels for twenty years or so now, actually. "grim and gritty" is largely recognised as cliché at best, travesty at worst.

-- thomp, Thursday, July 17, 1946 9:16 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 11:45 (fifteen years ago) link

this is why kiss me deadly is a parody!

thomp, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:17 (fifteen years ago) link

jk it is actually a parody for totally different reasons, are you one of those people that takes noir VERY SERIOUSLY as an HIGHBROW AESTHETE? if so, you should be shot.

thomp, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:18 (fifteen years ago) link

ha fuck no, im one of those people who thinks this looks like a badass movie

are you one of those people who think 'adaptation' was gods greatest gift to filmmaking?

deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm sure this has been mentioned, as I haven't read the whole thread, but in discussing critical reaction to this I think it's important to be specific about when someone is putting The Dark Knight into the context of "super-hero" COMIC BOOKS and when it's being put into the context of "super-hero" comic-book MOVIE ADAPTATIONS. Which are not the same thing.

TDK feels more like a good, epic crime procedural (HEAT is the movie it evokes, strongly) than it does like any other comic-hero MOVIE. I'm sure there are plenty of comics -- Batman comics probably — that have the same feel/tone. But none of the super hero movies quite do. If it rises above it's form (and I'm not sure it does -- I like X-Men 2 best of the comic adaptations I've seen), it's the form of the movie-adaptations, not of comic books themselves.

Hubie Brown, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

just came back from a midnight screening.

yeah, it ruled. that is all.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 07:09 (fifteen years ago) link

i need to rewatch this though. i was forced to sit in the front row, the theater was so packed.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 07:15 (fifteen years ago) link

does batman really say punk rock joker?

czn, Friday, 18 July 2008 07:20 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't think so. i don't remember him saying it. but i missed a lot of little things.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 07:26 (fifteen years ago) link

does christian bale ever have his shirt off? that is pretty much all i care about.

strgn, Friday, 18 July 2008 07:42 (fifteen years ago) link

so fuckin tired of superhero movies, don't care how 'dark' or 'innovative' they are. i just want to see some super-physiques, feel me

strgn, Friday, 18 July 2008 07:43 (fifteen years ago) link

he impales the joker and two-face with his cock, but he has his shirt on.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 07:44 (fifteen years ago) link

this was the shit

J0rdan S., Friday, 18 July 2008 08:12 (fifteen years ago) link

whoever plays the joker next should kill himself before the role cuz he isn't topping ledger

J0rdan S., Friday, 18 July 2008 08:13 (fifteen years ago) link

robert downey jr in blackface cameo was A++ too

J0rdan S., Friday, 18 July 2008 08:13 (fifteen years ago) link

i just saw this, it was pretty good. all i'll say about it is that it could've been about 1/3rd shorter and less complicated. heath ledger and gary oldman rule. christian bale's "batman voice" is terrible, though.

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 10:20 (fifteen years ago) link

does robert downjey jnr really cameo in blackface?

czn, Friday, 18 July 2008 10:23 (fifteen years ago) link

it's 45 minutes too long. it thinks it's a brooding, morailty tale, with all gray and no black or white, which it's not. it's actually got a bit of ayn rand in it, which i found tedious. the acting is all well done, but the characters themselves are much less interesting than in the first one... though to be honest, i don't think any of the roles were especially demanding. and to top it all off, maggie gylenhall looks like the fish man from hellboy. seriously.

gregory first world, Friday, 18 July 2008 11:18 (fifteen years ago) link

i'd like to see a pixar batman more than the self-serious murk this film seems to be promising . . . .

Pixar shouldn't just be making films for the kid market, anyway. Everytime I'm sitting through a Pixar film with my wife and daughter, I think: ''You know what would be great? A Pixar version of Jaws.''

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 18 July 2008 11:34 (fifteen years ago) link

YES

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 18 July 2008 11:45 (fifteen years ago) link

A friend raised a question I'd never thought of ... why don't they call Caine ALFIE the Butler?

"'Ello, sir... Black rubber again t'night? Ow, the birds really go fer that, eh? Fair nuff."

Dr Morbius, Friday, 18 July 2008 13:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Or Caine as Harry Palmer: "Going out? I was just about to make an omelette. Do us a favour and bring us back some tinned mushrooms. And get the expensive ones this time, cos there really is a difference in the flavour."

snoball, Friday, 18 July 2008 13:51 (fifteen years ago) link

...or as Charlie Croker: "You were only supposed to blow the bloody doors off! Not flatten a street full of cars and fill an apartment block full of bat droppings."

snoball, Friday, 18 July 2008 13:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Or as the old hippie in Children of Men: "Joker, eh? Think you're funny, eh? Come on, pull my finger."

Rock Hardy, Friday, 18 July 2008 14:06 (fifteen years ago) link

see, none of those are short for "Alfred"

Dr Morbius, Friday, 18 July 2008 14:11 (fifteen years ago) link

How about the film ending with a real cliffhanger ending, with the Batmobile balancing on the edge of a cliff and Alfred says "Wait a minute, I've got an idea"? Oh never mind...

snoball, Friday, 18 July 2008 14:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Saw this in IMAX last night. Really good, though strangely derivative of No Country for Old Men and Saw. Take those three movies and you've got a thesis on the American psyche in this decade, I guess.

I loved the heavy Mies van der Rohe influence on the interiors (which fits with the whole Chicago skyline). Also interesting how careful Nolan was to exclude any easily identifiable landmarks (Sears Tower, Hancock Tower, etc.) and focus on the more anonymous ones.

In IMAX, the Hong Kong section was especially amazing.

Eazy, Friday, 18 July 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

This film was shot before anyone but festival audiences saw No Country for Old Men, oui?

Dr Morbius, Friday, 18 July 2008 16:24 (fifteen years ago) link

i tink i might see this tonight, i am very excited

not to get too OT here but is "saw" actually worth seeing eazy? usually mainstream horror movies come out & every year theres a couple where people are like but this ones DIFFERENT & SPECIAL in some way & every time theyre not (in my experience)

deeznuts, Friday, 18 July 2008 16:25 (fifteen years ago) link

True. No idea if NCfOM the screenplay was circulated much before then, or if it's just (coin)cidence.

I've only seen enough of Saw clips to know it's a manclown taunting people and setting traps for them from afar.

Eazy, Friday, 18 July 2008 16:27 (fifteen years ago) link

But... The joker IS a 'manclown' and two-face DOES make decisions based on the toss of a coin, these are established characters devised way before 'saw' or 'no country' and as such it's bullshit to suggest they are derivative of the saw bloke and anton chigurrrrrrr.

Great movie by the way, a big step up from batman begins in my opinion.

And the pencil trick was just brilliant!

spaghetti, Friday, 18 July 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Reminiscent of Saw??????

HI DERE, Friday, 18 July 2008 17:03 (fifteen years ago) link

y'know Batman villains and their traps, etc.

kinda foolish to say this is derivative of sources that are actually predated by all this stuff in the Batman mythos (coin-flipping, death traps, etc.)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 July 2008 17:05 (fifteen years ago) link

saw and no country for old men = "IT IS DARK AND OSTENSIBLY NIHILISTIC"

remy bean, Friday, 18 July 2008 17:06 (fifteen years ago) link

yea i didnt make the connection b/w jigsaw=joker & two-face = chigurh, that doesnt really hold water

deeznuts, Friday, 18 July 2008 17:07 (fifteen years ago) link

i always thought chigurh's coin fetish was pretty lol two-face.

Jordan, Friday, 18 July 2008 17:08 (fifteen years ago) link

And the pencil trick was just brilliant!

-- spaghetti, Friday, July 18, 2008 12:01 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

theatre had big lols at this

J0rdan S., Friday, 18 July 2008 17:11 (fifteen years ago) link

And I'm out of this thread until I see it.

"pencil trick" is enough of a harbinger of spoilers for me to know when I should leave.

B.L.A.M., Friday, 18 July 2008 18:07 (fifteen years ago) link

The coin, the clown, you guys are right. As a moviegoer, and as far as thinking about what fears they're playing on, they made me think of these other movies.

Eazy, Friday, 18 July 2008 18:41 (fifteen years ago) link

i still can't get over how lame bale's "angry batman" growl was.

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:31 (fifteen years ago) link

i can get over it. but it is kinda lame, like he's gargling gravel.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:33 (fifteen years ago) link

I had trouble with it for the first half-hour or so, eventually I got over it.

Simon H., Friday, 18 July 2008 19:35 (fifteen years ago) link

they should've gotten the dude from the animated series to do it

Jordan, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:36 (fifteen years ago) link

kevin conroy

Jordan, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:37 (fifteen years ago) link

I came three times. I'm seeing it again today

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:42 (fifteen years ago) link

you did clean up the mess? just saying, i used to me an usher at a movie theater. be considerate.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

buttered his popcorn --

Rock Hardy, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

no worries, I put garbage bags on my seat and the two adjoining....

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:45 (fifteen years ago) link

through probably should have done that BEFORE I came....

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:45 (fifteen years ago) link

whatever that shit is that they put on the popcorn, it sure as hell ain't butter.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:45 (fifteen years ago) link

really it is the nastiest shit ever. try heating it up in the morning! after i left that job i couldn't eat popcorn for like a year.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Canola oil if I'm not mistaken.

I don't know if perhaps I've just changed tastes over time, or if they've really tampered with the formula, but I absolutely abhor movie theatre popcorn now. It actually makes me feel sick to have more than a little of it, and I used to ingest it as a kid.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:47 (fifteen years ago) link

I had trouble with it for the first half-hour or so, eventually I got over it.

-- Simon H

i had the opposite reaction! i thought it was harder to get over at the end of the movie, when there was less cops-and-robbers and more batman in general.

i was just trying to explain this movie to my mom and i think whatever reviewer called it "untouchables with a batman in it" sort of nailed it, or at least the good parts of the movie. i thought the cops-and-robbers stuff was amazing and fantastic. the police funeral, the car chase, the scenes with the captured joker in the major crimes unit. the middle third, i guess. i would've been as happy with a batman-less movie of gary oldman & the MCU vs the joker!

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:48 (fifteen years ago) link

I feel sorry for Mamma Mia. well ,not really because it's rubbish, but I wonder how many people attended the midnight premiere of that movie last night. I didn't see anybody going to see it at the theatre I went to.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:49 (fifteen years ago) link

x-post

the popcorn itself really isn't so bad. the buttery sludge they ask if you want on the popcorn is what i'm talking about.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:49 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost oh and the heist and hospital scenes. incredible!

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Oldman was brilliant, but did anybody else think his accent poked out a hell of a lot more than it did in Batman Begins?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:50 (fifteen years ago) link

i think they switched oils fairly recently but i could be totally wrong

the only time ive ever gotten sick from movie theater popcorn was ironically at a theater that used REAL BUTTER, unfortunately they fucking soaked it in that stuff

deeznuts, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:50 (fifteen years ago) link

agreed bloomer. the problem is I don't really like my popcorn plain unless I oversalt it, so I naturally ask for that "butter" concoction.

it really tastes like it came out of a cat though

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Oldman was brilliant, but did anybody else think his accent walrus 'stache poked out a hell of a lot more than it did in Batman Begins?

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:51 (fifteen years ago) link

ahahahahahahhahaha

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:52 (fifteen years ago) link

just bought my ticket to today's afternoon show. hope all the mexicans don't steal the good seats

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:53 (fifteen years ago) link

ana ortiz deserved more screen time ... maybe she'll come back in the next one?

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:53 (fifteen years ago) link

completely unintentional xpost >:-(

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:53 (fifteen years ago) link

it really tastes like it came out of a cat though

Unheated fresh from the container it looks like the bags of human fat from Fight Club.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:56 (fifteen years ago) link

*spoiler*

anybody that would have preferred to see Katie Holmes get blown up instead?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:56 (fifteen years ago) link

lols thats a pretty big fucking spoiler dude

J0rdan S., Friday, 18 July 2008 19:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Popcorn butter....is people!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:57 (fifteen years ago) link

that probably deserves a much bigger spoiler tag

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:57 (fifteen years ago) link

i'd ask a mod to delete tat, but i don't want to spoil the movie for the mod

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:57 (fifteen years ago) link

that's my fault, I forgot you can't merely just add extra lines to the message by hitting "enter" multiple times.

sorry about that, hope nobody who hasn't seen the movie is reading. I remember the angry messages on Yahoo! MOvies when Sixth Sense came out for that reason.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:57 (fifteen years ago) link

oh, i forgot about that too. good to know. :-(

well, i don't know about you all, i saw 2 of the 3 big twists coming but i didn't see that one!

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 19:59 (fifteen years ago) link

“Batman” isn’t a comic book anymore.

I am totally ambivalent to report: Batman is still a comic book.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:01 (fifteen years ago) link

That is not to imply that I did not gain weighty moral insights from this masterpiece. For instance: it's wrong to spy on people, except when it works. :/

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:02 (fifteen years ago) link

in the final monologue, was i tripping, or did gary oldman actually call batman a "cyber defender"?

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:04 (fifteen years ago) link

silent. Silent defender.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:05 (fifteen years ago) link

ha ha ha

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:06 (fifteen years ago) link

i had just watched the obama speech about america's cyber defenses, must have been why i was tripping

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:06 (fifteen years ago) link

*spoiler*

Did anybody think the gay sex scene with Oldman and Eckhart was unnecessary?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:08 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost To be fair, Batman is pretty cyber.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:10 (fifteen years ago) link

at the theatre i was at people kept screaming out "I LOVE YOU" in camp voices during the 3-way dent-bale-eckhart conversations

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:12 (fifteen years ago) link

it was obnoxious but funny

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:12 (fifteen years ago) link

oldman-bale-eckhart, ya mean?

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:13 (fifteen years ago) link

I was pleasantly surprised at how well-behaved our crowd was. Normally they're bringing crying babies and actually taking pictures of themselves in the theatre (seriously, wtf?)

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:13 (fifteen years ago) link

oldman-bale-eckhart, ya mean?

-- kenan

see, that's what GOOD ACTING does

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:14 (fifteen years ago) link

i was disappointed that Shaquille O'Neal didn't have a cameo

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:14 (fifteen years ago) link

the ayn rand comment upthread is wrong. the first act has pacing issues to be sure, but once we get to the part of the story nolan really wanted to tell, it's amazing. beautifully made.

Gukbe, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:14 (fifteen years ago) link

except i keep calling him "dent" instead of "gordon", possibly because with that big mustache he looks a lot like a "harvey"

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:15 (fifteen years ago) link

more like first and third act

yeah too bad about shaquille but at least you got tiny lister / zeus, right?

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:16 (fifteen years ago) link

has anybody revisted the Burton/Shumacher Batman movies?

They didn't hold up for me as well as I thought. I still liked Burton's Batman but hated Batman Returns on repeat viewing.

Won't even touch the Shumacher's, which were crap

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:17 (fifteen years ago) link

deeply underrated

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:19 (fifteen years ago) link

I will still stand up for the third Batman movie as being great campy fun, with codpieces.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:19 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost, moonship otm

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:20 (fifteen years ago) link

I might have to see that again now, actually, to wash all this coal-dust-colored moral gravity off me.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Madness is like gravity, indeed.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:22 (fifteen years ago) link

what's funny about the scene is that the thing on top of the helmet that looks an awful lot like a blender is actually the top of a commercial coffee grinder ... "caffeine'll kill ya!"

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:22 (fifteen years ago) link

i forget exactly what the movie landscape was like when that came out but IIRC we were all suffering through a glut of surreal weirdly-lit fantasy-landscape movies like "city of lost children" and "nightmare before christmas" and whatnot and that whole OTT style (is there a name for it?) was starting to get pretty tired.

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:25 (fifteen years ago) link

At least the Batman credit card ("never leave the cave without it") was saved for the next movie.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:25 (fifteen years ago) link

we were all suffering through a glut of surreal weirdly-lit fantasy-landscape movies

I feel like right now we're suffering through the Age Of The Thinly Veiled Meatphor. Usually for the war on terror, or Iraq, or what have you. You know what we really need? Better porn.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:28 (fifteen years ago) link

here's another thing we're suffering through: movies where people casually shoot each other without warning ... at points "the dark knight" started to feel a lot like "the departed" or "children of men" or "no country for old men" (specifically with the way GRITTY GUN VIOLENCE was deployed) and i don't have a whole lot of patience for that. a lot of times during the dark knight i was like "oh for god's sake, will the director please stop having hapless beat cops get shot for no reason". i actually sympathize with armond white on that point.

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:29 (fifteen years ago) link

The Kiss from a Rose video is much better than movie itsel. Forever is a dud.

xxxpost

Gukbe, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:30 (fifteen years ago) link

I very much forgive it in No Country, because that kind of thing is a Coen Bros trademark, if not partial invention.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Gary Oldman? I thought that was short-story writer Stuart Dybek.

http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/images/2007/09/dybek1_infusino.jpg

Eazy, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:32 (fifteen years ago) link

just saw this in IMAX. it was pretty good.

amateurist, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:34 (fifteen years ago) link

it only happened a few times in NCfOM, though, compared to all the freaking time in tDK. and anyway that wasn't a PG-13 "superhero movie".

NCfOM actually pretty great at keeping the violence off-screen!

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:35 (fifteen years ago) link

almost all the gore (if not violence) was kept offscreen in THE DARK KNIGHT, i noticed. still felt very brutal, especially when... i guess i shouldn't spoil it.

amateurist, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

I've gone off before about the sequence in No Country when Tommy Lee Jones drives up just in time to see the aftermath of what must have gotten pretty ugly. One of my favorite sequences.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:37 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost

i think that is the difference between R and PG-13.

it was always: dude looks up at camera, reverse-angle shot with someone drawing the gun, sudden cut to black accompanied by a super loud BANG

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

well, not always, but you get the point.

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:39 (fifteen years ago) link

I can't believe this only got a 12A in the UK.

Gukbe, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:39 (fifteen years ago) link

The one half of Two Face's face looked pretty R to me. Sickening. Good job, I guess I mean.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Little details, like the blood on his pillow... ugh.

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:41 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah but it kind of killed "suspension of disbelief" a bit. could anybody really walk around like that?

think of how much brainpower went into director-producer discussions on how to make this as violent and visceral as possible without pulling an R rating.

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:41 (fifteen years ago) link

I have kind of a big question about the ending of TDK and wanted to gauge satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Maybe after the weekend when more folks have seen it.

I want to see Aaron E. do Glengarry in that makeup.

Eazy, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:42 (fifteen years ago) link

could anybody really walk around like that?

OR SPEAK!

kenan, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

put me down as extremely impressed by the middle third but dissatisfied with the ending. i give it 7/10.

i've been thinking a lot about "hannibal" lately, partly because of anthony hopkins vs heath ledger comparisons i've been hearing. i thought maybe it would've been better if they did two-face sort of like gary oldman in "hannibal". but maybe that's too far off from the comic book.

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

oldman in hannibal = i don't think i've really seen anything as disgusting in the movies since. well, maybe the few post-irreversible head-smashing scenes. there was one in "pan's labyrinth", where was the other?

moonship journey to baja, Friday, 18 July 2008 20:45 (fifteen years ago) link

the sequences shot on 70mm were pretty spectacular when projected in that format. people gasped.

amateurist, Friday, 18 July 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I will not sit idly by while people defend Batman Forever.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 23:48 (fifteen years ago) link

this movie was so long. aaron eckhart stuff completely unnecessary. i agree that the cops vs joker thread was way more compelling than anything bats did. gotham central would make a terrific movie.

adam, Friday, 18 July 2008 23:49 (fifteen years ago) link

aaron eckhart really sucks.

adam, Friday, 18 July 2008 23:50 (fifteen years ago) link

he was better than you were in the movie

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 23:50 (fifteen years ago) link

you did portray the rottweiler right?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 18 July 2008 23:51 (fifteen years ago) link

eckhart was fine.

a LOT of british and australian talent here

nolan = english
bale = welsh
ledger = australian
caine = english
oldman = english

amateurist, Friday, 18 July 2008 23:59 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought eckhart was good. adam smokin' crack.

latebloomer, Friday, 18 July 2008 23:59 (fifteen years ago) link

at least in terms of the principals, they seem to outnumber the americans (gyllenhaal, eckhardt, freeman...)

amateurist, Friday, 18 July 2008 23:59 (fifteen years ago) link

also:

didn't care much for the proper score,

but the low- and high-pitched electronic drones worked REALLY well! sort of lynchian--they were clearly not coming from anything IN the film, but they weren't exactly proper "scoring" either.

amateurist, Saturday, 19 July 2008 00:01 (fifteen years ago) link

and i reiterate: you should see this in IMAX, the helicopter shots of chicago were especially magnificent.

amateurist, Saturday, 19 July 2008 00:01 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't really go back on what i said earlier, not entirely anyway; the ideas behind the film didn't seem as compelling as some (ebert, et al) would say, and i think there was a degree of incoherence that reviewers aren't acknowledging. and i thought some minor plot points were a bit botched in the telling. but overall this was quite fine.

amateurist, Saturday, 19 July 2008 00:02 (fifteen years ago) link

////SPOILERS?////

and the whole batman-as-jesus thing was a bit dubious, although i think they set up the next film nicely, but putting b-man in a very different place. although, i sort of remember one of the earlier films doing this too, maybe batman returns? it's been 15+ years though, so i'm not sure i remember perfectly.

amateurist, Saturday, 19 July 2008 00:03 (fifteen years ago) link

x-post

yeah, it's actually kind of a messy film. but really really good.

latebloomer, Saturday, 19 July 2008 00:05 (fifteen years ago) link

SPOILERS][][

my crack smoking aside did yall really buy his 3rd act flipout? dude was totally hamming it up all blandly and nothing in the face of ledger/bale ham.

i liked the rottweilers.

adam, Saturday, 19 July 2008 00:51 (fifteen years ago) link

didn't care much for the proper score,

but the low- and high-pitched electronic drones worked REALLY well!

soundtrack should have been all dubstep.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 01:46 (fifteen years ago) link

I will not sit idly by while people defend Batman Forever.

Bring it on, Mr. Humorless. I'll go get my rubber outfit.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 01:58 (fifteen years ago) link

It was a steaming pile! STEAMING PILE!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:01 (fifteen years ago) link

No, it was spectacle, and camp, and very shallow, and totally pissed on any notion of Batman as brooding Nietzschian superman. Schumacher's Batman is much different, much sillier animal.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:13 (fifteen years ago) link

not to mention it was zzzzzzzzzzZZzzzzzzzzzzzz and too self-aware at times

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:14 (fifteen years ago) link

I'll take self-silly over self-serious any day

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:17 (fifteen years ago) link

i love how movies that don't completely take themselves seriously get let off the hook as if standards go out the window once you wink at the audience

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:18 (fifteen years ago) link

That's unfair. I didn't say it was a great movie (and I kinda hate Tommy Lee Jones in it), I said it was fun.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:20 (fifteen years ago) link

A night in with whatever's on cable, like.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:20 (fifteen years ago) link

I thought Val Kilmer looked totally out of place, didn't enjoy myself at all (and I was only about 15 at the time!). but hey, that's me...

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:21 (fifteen years ago) link

You do hold the majority opinion.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:22 (fifteen years ago) link

it's easy to call a movie "deeply underrated" when most people would give it 1/10. even arguing for 3/10 is a 300% improvement!

moonship journey to baja, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:31 (fifteen years ago) link

i wouldn't say it's good, i would say "not entirely without merit"

kilmer's not that bad, but tommy lee's awful. the script is great in the way pixar movies are great - those schumacher movies are not unlike live-action cartoons?

moonship journey to baja, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:32 (fifteen years ago) link

^^ this is awful logic: "batman forever reminds me of pixar movies" != "it is great in the same way pixar movies are great"

still, maybe a conversation starter

moonship journey to baja, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:36 (fifteen years ago) link

that was pretty awesome, even if it was about 20 minutes too long (hong kong action could easily have been lost, for instance). lived up to my really high expectations (based on nothing but the first film - i've been avoiding finding out anything else about this one, other than that it had heath ledger as the joker). pencil trick was particularly memorable, but basically so many good bits. when can we discuss this properly? what are people doing reading this thread who haven't been but are planning to, anyway?

oh, and yeah, bale's batman voice sucks.

toby, Saturday, 19 July 2008 02:56 (fifteen years ago) link

i want to watch it again just to see anthony michael hall, totally had no idea he was in there.

colette, Saturday, 19 July 2008 03:00 (fifteen years ago) link

I saw him in the credits too and wondered who he was.

Only downside to this movie is that the next 10 Halloweens will look like this:
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/darkknight-crowd1.jpg
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/darkknight-ethanjoker.jpg

Eazy, Saturday, 19 July 2008 03:16 (fifteen years ago) link

i loved this but

oh, and yeah, bale's batman voice sucks.

-- toby, Friday, July 18, 2008 9:56 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

otm

gbx, Saturday, 19 July 2008 03:21 (fifteen years ago) link

yes

amateurist, Saturday, 19 July 2008 03:33 (fifteen years ago) link

i think everyone can agree on that

amateurist, Saturday, 19 July 2008 03:33 (fifteen years ago) link

(hong kong action could easily have been lost, for instance)

ok maybe continuity-wise, but OMG the cityscapes as he flies around! Gorgeous.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 03:47 (fifteen years ago) link

and amateurist (hi there!) is OTM about how great Chicago looks. The first movie was shot in full-on CG Chicago that was mostly unrecognizable save for a few landmarks, and this movie was just plain shot in Chicago. I can't remember how many times they were in someone's office with the windows looking out on a very real view, and I thought, "I know exactly where that is" or "I used to work there!"

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 03:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Dude who drinks the poison? I worked in that building. It's the big black Van der Rohe slab at the NE corner of Michigan and Wacker.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 03:54 (fifteen years ago) link

In fact (I had to look it up, took me a sec) I took this picture out the window of that building. So Gotham-y.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3075/2681721848_f0e5388ab1_o.jpg

so... yeah. Totally geeked on how great Chicago looks.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 04:08 (fifteen years ago) link

hell yeah, that movie was a joyride! especially when it's real late at night and I haven't taken my sleeping pills yet.

Heh, the usher even told people to be quiet before the movie started which was nice. Not to mention the Watchmen trailer before the movie!

CaptainLorax, Saturday, 19 July 2008 05:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, which didn't horrify me, surprisingly. Still not holding my breath, tho.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 05:24 (fifteen years ago) link

I enjoyed it. Liked it a little bit more than BB, but the series is still not as strong as Spider-man when it comes to storytelling and general structure. Most of the things I liked about the film others have already touched upon in great detail so I'll skip to things that bugged me. (minor spoiler alert)

Pop-psychology and "philosophy major" speeches from the Joker about human nature and the nature of evil were irritatinf. I find it coincidental that Ledger originally based the Joker on Malcolm McDowell's performance in A Clockwork Orange, and McDowell got that part from playing a bratty revolutionary in If..., where McDowell and his friends would spout similar cliches about the need for revolutionary violence...before they indiscriminately blasted away everyone in a school shooting. Some of the Jokers' rhetoric about society and violence was the type of pretentious nihilism I would expect from a school shooter's blog entry the day before the big shootout. I cringed when it went on long.

Tying right into that: Nolan's Batman universe seems to take a pessimistic, gloomy, and nihilistic view of the world, and yet the Joker's "social experiment" towards the end and the decision the people come to (and the way they come about it) is oddly reminiscent of the type of upbeat, populist messages you might expect from the Spider-Man movies during scenes where the masses get involved in the film ("We New Yorkers stick together like family!). Everything about the way Nolan portrays Gotham city and its people hints that they'd act in the exact opposite way than the way they did. (Boy, it's hard to describe that scene without giving away spoilers) He goes from trying to emulate the world of Blade Runner to giving us the good-natured world of Spider-man, where people aren't selfish and greedy when it "really matters." Then why's the city such a sewer if everyone (including convicted murderers)are really saints?

That's enough thoughts for now.

Cunga, Saturday, 19 July 2008 06:26 (fifteen years ago) link

The Joker isn't a nihilist, he just thinks he is. All of his "pop-psychology" babble is undone by the choices the people made in his modified prisoner's dilemma.

I think the choices made by Batman and Gordon at the end are a pretty good reflection of the Gotham Nolan has portrayed.

Gukbe, Saturday, 19 July 2008 06:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Then why's the city such a sewer if everyone (including convicted murderers)are really saints?

You are exactly right, exactly, I thought that was a weak bit in about eight different ways, but primarily because by any real world logic, the joker's idea would have worked perfectly, and people would have stepped on their elderly mother's head to get to that goddamn button. Unless the criminals were faster, and overtaking that little pale dude holding the button would not have taken much, since everyone on that boat seemed pretty much without physical restraint (this is not how prisoners are transported, I pray). And Batman's confidence that nothing would happen was based on what? His intimate acquaintance with human nature? The same acquaintance that leads him to, for instance, take to the streets and fight crime because he doesn't feel anyone else is quite up to the job? What the fucking fuck.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 06:45 (fifteen years ago) link

We didn't get the Watchmen trailer but I'd already seen it online so etc. etc.

*spoilers kinda following, sorta*

Well. I actually love this film almost unreservedly, really. Couple of things didn't work -- very ending spoken bit was 'hmmm, no' and it did stretch out a little too long (but compared to the complete pacing fuck-up of the Indiana Jones movie it was perfect). But otherwise, damn.

And I really don't mind the VOICE OF DOOM, actually. Jarring at times but I think it works.

Patrick Leahy cameo eh but I loved how they went right ahead and brought back Cilian Murphy as the Scarecrow and then almost immediately dispensed with him again.

The pencil trick was definitely my 'holy shit the hype may be right' moment re: Ledger. And you know, I really never saw much with him over time -- and I didn't 'see' him in the role, in the sense that I look at Harvey Dent and I'm all, "Yeah, Aaron Eckhart in an Aaron Eckhart role, the WASPy guy." And the whole hospital sequence...

Nearly all the deaths surprised me. Even the one fake one. One reason why I felt a bit flattened by the ending was who DID finally die for real -- felt like setting up one mean headfuck of a third movie and then it was jerked away from under the audience.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 July 2008 06:52 (fifteen years ago) link

The Joker isn't a nihilist, he just thinks he is. All of his "pop-psychology" babble is undone by the choices the people made in his modified prisoner's dilemma.

I don't understand. How so?

I think the choices made by Batman and Gordon at the end are a pretty good reflection of the Gotham Nolan has portrayed.

The actions are certainly more in tune with the previous 120 minutes!

You are exactly right, exactly, I thought that was a weak bit in about eight different ways, but primarily because by any real world logic, the joker's idea would have worked perfectly, and people would have stepped on their elderly mother's head to get to that goddamn button. Unless the criminals were faster, and overtaking that little pale dude holding the button would not have taken much, since everyone on that boat seemed pretty much without physical restraint (this is not how prisoners are transported, I pray). And Batman's confidence that nothing would happen was based on what? His intimate acquaintance with human nature? The same acquaintance that leads him to, for instance, take to the streets and fight crime because he doesn't feel anyone else is quite up to the job? What the fucking fuck.

We seem to be on the same page here. For all this talk about a comic-book film where "there is no black and white, just shades of gray, everyone is corrupt etc etc Zzzzzzzzz" we get a climax that is right out of the first two Spider-Mans in its reliance upon innate human decency to help our hero when he can't do it all. Why is that? Do we not want to see a movie where modern day society is not only criticized in words but in our actions?

In a way the scene is typical PC. The only person willing to push the button is a person from the citizens boat and he, with his hands full with a briefcase and papers, is probably (hold your booing!) a lawyer or businessman. There they go again only thinking of themselves! The rest of us wouldn't do that, only they would.

My sixteen-year-old brother told me he knew how the leading criminal on the boat would act because he said that because the only two previous black characters (aside from Freeman) were thuggish criminals (who died no less) they wouldn't let all of them be portrayed unsympathetically for the sake of not wanting to draw suspicions of racism or profiling, which I though was a pretty interesting insight. There are certain rules like that in film that people remember and guide them almost unconsciously.

Cunga, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Nearly all the deaths surprised me. Even the one fake one. One reason why I felt a bit flattened by the ending was who DID finally die for real -- felt like setting up one mean headfuck of a third movie and then it was jerked away from under the audience.

Well, all the principal actors are signed on for a third but Nolan isn't obligated to direct. I think he's going to breathe a sigh of relief at not having to figure out where to go next with this. Good luck to the people who have to figure out how to tie-up that gigantic loose end. My brother's idea of the similarly blond-haired Owen Wilson stepping in to replace the Joker, and his delivering of the Joker's lines in Wilson's famous "yaaah" twang, had me laughing pretty hard.

Cunga, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:21 (fifteen years ago) link

I think he's going to breathe a sigh of relief at not having to figure out where to go next with this.

Mmm, wouldn't blame him. Yet I'd heard he'd been toying with a three picture arc? I would really enjoy at least one more from him.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:23 (fifteen years ago) link

My sixteen-year-old brother told me he knew how the leading criminal on the boat would act because he said that because the only two previous black characters (aside from Freeman) were thuggish criminals (who died no less) they wouldn't let all of them be portrayed unsympathetically for the sake of not wanting to draw suspicions of racism or profiling, which I though was a pretty interesting insight. There are certain rules like that in film that people remember and guide them almost unconsciously.

Well, yes to all this...and also it was Michael Jai White, so of course he'd be a good guy.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:24 (fifteen years ago) link

The two previous black criminals were also not merely thuggish, but thuggish and apparently high-ranking and in pretty nice-looking suits. I think we are on the same page -- all this crossed my mind as well.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:27 (fifteen years ago) link

Nihilism is a pretty complex subject, so I'm naturally a bit hesitant to bandy it about. Anyway, the Joker doesn't just want nothing or pure destruction, he wants confirmation of his view on humanity. He believes/wants to believe that people will act in a certain way, and they don't.

I don't think Batman's belief that nothing would happen was out of character. In the first film he feels all they need is hope to get them out of the depression, and I don't think anything has changed. He knows that he's lost himself in his vigilante role, and as much as he might wish he could leave it all behind and be with Rachel and have a normal life etc..., he can't. The only thing that separates him from the criminals is his belief in the people. There is a certain degree of self-deception there, but I did find it to be in character.

Anyway, it's an amazing film, especially considering that it's a big-budget tentpole. These don't come along very often.

Gukbe, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:34 (fifteen years ago) link

In the first film he feels all they need is hope to get them out of the depression

Hope is a very high-level brain function. Not being dead is not.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, hello, mob mentality.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:44 (fifteen years ago) link

I suppose he should have had one blow the other up, because then it really would be Ayn Rand-esque.

Gukbe, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:49 (fifteen years ago) link

If the Joker was right about how awful we all are but still wrong in thinking it means that we're all worthless, that would be some moral ambiguity I could get behind.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:53 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost - Well, looking at this film specific to 2008, there's a reason that nothing close to 9/11 has happened again in the U.S. -- because most people either don't want to blow things up or don't have the gumption to execute such a plan. The Joker assumes that everyone has his impulses within him, and within the story the folks on the ferry prove him wrong.

Eazy, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:54 (fifteen years ago) link

It reminds me of a story I heard of someone seeing Fargo and saying it was weird seeing an Indian and an Asian portrayed unsympathetically and with no equal and opposite portrayal of minorities. He said it almost left him unsatisfied because kept waiting for the positive figure to appear and, unbelievably in modern films, he never did.

I still think Bale is a boring Wayne. Though his handsomeness didn't lend as well to action figures, Keaton had a bookish look to him and a sense of humor which made the Wayne character interesting to be around. At least from what I remember from the first Batman. A bit of light-hearted smartass coming from Bale, and not Caine or Freeman, would do wonders for the Bruce moments. The problem is, I think, that Bale rarely lets down the intensity enough so that people would think it alright to laugh and that comedic relief seems to be missing from all of the Nolan films I've seen. I'm not asking for Jim Carrey to return to the series, I'd just wish everything wasn't so grim and intense except for the occasional Caine quip.

I don't think Batman's belief that nothing would happen was out of character. In the first film he feels all they need is hope to get them out of the depression, and I don't think anything has changed. He knows that he's lost himself in his vigilante role, and as much as he might wish he could leave it all behind and be with Rachel and have a normal life etc..., he can't. The only thing that separates him from the criminals is his belief in the people. There is a certain degree of self-deception there, but I did find it to be in character.

I see what you mean but then I think of Gordon's denouement speech about how "Batman isn't the hero we need, but he's the one we deserve," and other lines about Batman representing the flawed hero that fits the equally flawed city. It doesn't fit after what we just saw! It was like the townspeople from "It's A Wonderful Life" took over the NYC of "Se7en."

But back to that line: of course he's not the hero they need. A city that has citizens that so believe in egalitarianism that they won't kill a boat full of prisoners (at the potential expense of their and their children's lives) and has criminals so noble as to not swarm the detonator to prolong their own life and potential judgment is already as close to a heavenly city as we'll get to.

Cunga, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:55 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost - Well, looking at this film specific to 2008, there's a reason that nothing close to 9/11 has happened again in the U.S. -- because most people either don't want to blow things up or don't have the gumption to execute such a plan. The Joker assumes that everyone has his impulses within him, and within the story the folks on the ferry prove him wrong.

But I believe there was a time limit where, if they didn't chose, they were lead to believe they'd both explode. I forgot about that until now, and it only makes the pacifistic attitude of the people even less plausible.

Cunga, Saturday, 19 July 2008 07:57 (fifteen years ago) link

I still think Bale is a boring Wayne.

I think he's a boring Batman (and a big no to the gravel voice, hafta agree with that complaint), but I love him as Wayne. Arrogant, snide... a real prick, actually. No social skills at all, because he has money instead. Something like I imagine such a powerful person with such a superiority complex might actually be like. Unfortunately, as Batman he seems *less* unstable and troubled, and that's all backwards.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Basically, I want a Batman movie scripted by Grant Morrison.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Okay, last thing before I just let that either morally muddled or a complete cop-out of a scene go. From someplace else:

Don't misunderstand the boat scene.

Batman takes it to mean that people are good, but he's wrong, as 3x as many people wanted to kill the prisoners. It's just that no one wanted to do it themselves.

Same with the guy who handed the trigger to the prisoner.

Yeah. It's showing that people are both selfish to the point of murder and too cowardly to take any action.

This, along with the regulars voting FOR detonating the other ship, makes much more sense and is in tone with the rest of the film. But still, if citizens engaging in democracy meant wanting to blow up the criminal's ship and only a criminal had the integrity to throw away the detonator (the modern day version of turning the other cheek?) then it makes the film's message much more in line with a point the Joker might try to make about society than about the platitudes Batman was spitting out during the fight.

Either way, I find the scene to be either morally questionable (if still in tone with the film) if interpreted that way and a downright cop-out if it's my first idea. And in either scenario human beings wouldn't act like that.

I think he's a boring Batman (and a big no to the gravel voice, hafta agree with that complaint), but I love him as Wayne. Arrogant, snide... a real prick, actually. No social skills at all, because he has money instead. Something like I imagine such a powerful person with such a superiority complex might actually be like. Unfortunately, as Batman he seems *less* unstable and troubled, and that's all backwards.

I wasn't sure in BB if Wayne was supposed to be such a lame playboy or not. He certainly pulls off being anti-social but, as suitable as that might be, it makes me care for him much less than if he had redeeming characteristics.

Cunga, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Well, I think this movie argues that his characteristics are at best incidental, and at worst troublesome, because he is taking on the burden of moral superoirity instead of just the mantle of it. That's Batman's character arc in this movie, really.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:28 (fifteen years ago) link

And Rachel is correct that he will never not need Batman, because jeez, as Bruce Wayne, what does he have to feel good about?

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:29 (fifteen years ago) link

That bed.

Eazy, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:30 (fifteen years ago) link

if your sixteen year-old brother is so insightful how come he didn't remember the commisioner?

moonship journey to baja, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:31 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost HA! I wanted that bed, too!

But that was just his penthouse bed -- his real bed back in the manor is much less hot and modern.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:32 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry, i didn't mean to sound so snide.

uh ... don't forget commissioner loeb!

moonship journey to baja, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:38 (fifteen years ago) link

and several dead black cops

moonship journey to baja, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:39 (fifteen years ago) link

his Bruce Wayne is really Patrick Bateman.

Roz, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:41 (fifteen years ago) link

lol bateman batman, etc.

Roz, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:41 (fifteen years ago) link

his Bruce Wayne is really Patrick Bateman.

Fucking hell yes, he is! See, that's what I'm talking about. His mask of sanity is about to slip.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:44 (fifteen years ago) link

And instead of decapitating women, he puts on a bat suit and fights crime. I mean, that's Batman, right?

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Maybe without so much Huey Lewis and the News, but still.

kenan, Saturday, 19 July 2008 08:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Did no-one else expect that the Joker had actually been sneaky and given them the detonators to their own boats but told them the opposite? I was expecting that to be the case and for the boat of "good people" to blow themselves up.

The Chicago stuff is awesome, yes - "OMG they're riding a motorbike through the train station we use to go Kalamazoo" etc. Makes me miss Chicago, and makes me want to go see it in IMAX (although nearest IMAX to hear is 20 miles away).

toby, Saturday, 19 July 2008 12:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh and I liked the final speech, but I'm a sucker for that kind of shit.

toby, Saturday, 19 July 2008 12:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Did no-one else expect that the Joker had actually been sneaky and given them the detonators to their own boats but told them the opposite?

This was pretty much the small group I was with's thought. It actually occurs to me just now, reading your post and typing this out, that the fact that we weren't only expecting it but kinda wanting it to happen -- for *something* deeply horrifying like that to happen -- means that the movie functions better as an implicit critique of expectations of violence in film than, say, Funny Games. (And did it ever have its cake and eat it too on that front.)

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 July 2008 12:52 (fifteen years ago) link

spoilers!

all this talk of gotham's "saintly" citizens misses out on two things: the regular folks showing up at the TV station to try and kill the guy who tried to out batman, and the fact that the people on the boat vote overwhelmingly to push the button.

Simon H., Saturday, 19 July 2008 13:06 (fifteen years ago) link

anthony michael hall was the news anchor

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 13:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Michael Jai White was the gangster. The good criminal was Tiny Lister.

Kerm, Saturday, 19 July 2008 13:38 (fifteen years ago) link

jon/via/chicago, do you still want IMAX tickets? i know someone that has 2 tickets for tuesday evening at the cinemark seven bridges (no idea where that is) and is selling them for face value. i can't keep up with the chicago thread at the moment, so if you are interested, email me through ILX mail.

colette, Saturday, 19 July 2008 13:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Michael Jai White was the gangster. The good criminal was Tiny Lister.

Oh yeah you're right. Brain fart.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 July 2008 14:01 (fifteen years ago) link

totally thought each boat had their own triggers, for sure. and i kept wanting to nudge people in the theater (in rock island, il) about all the chicago intersections (THAT IS FRANKLIN AND VANBUREN, YO) but no one cared.

the pencil trick was totally o_O and would have been even creepier if they entire movie theater HADN'T ERUPTED INTO CHEERING WTF. i mean, it was a midnight showing attended mostly by teenagers, but seriously. most of the creepy, awesome, whatever stuff was completely undercut by people cheering their asses off. stfu

gbx, Saturday, 19 July 2008 14:32 (fifteen years ago) link

pencil tricks was more gasps where we were. cheering was all at the trailers, thankfully. oh, and at the lorry flip.

toby, Saturday, 19 July 2008 14:48 (fifteen years ago) link

yea but what do you expect on a midnight showing? that's why I'm usually afraid to go to those.

I went again yesterday in the afternoon and it was apples and oranges.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 14:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Bale's batman voice = Nathan Explosion from Metalocalypse. You heard it here first.

Kath, Saturday, 19 July 2008 15:32 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost: I read that as "aspies and oranges"

Kerm, Saturday, 19 July 2008 15:36 (fifteen years ago) link

I SAW THE Movie Today at the Amc Theater at 2 30 It Was So Cool Everybody was like amazed when The Joker Did The Pencil Trick at the henchmen I Think when he stabbed him he stabbed his eye or his head but It Was like so cool.

and what, Saturday, 19 July 2008 15:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Ok. The Joker sticks a pencil in the desk vertically, with the pointed end up and tells the mob bosses in the conference room that he is gonna preform a 'magic trick' and make the pencil 'disappear.' The group of mob bosses think it's a joke (which it kind of is) so they send a man to go beat him up and stop waisting their time. The Joker calmly watches the man come after him and slams the man's head down into the pencil. When the dead body slides off the table the pencil is fully inside of the man's head; thus the pencil 'disappeared'.

This was significant because the Joker predicted that the mob boss was gonna send one of his men after him when he mentioned the 'magic trick'. By killing the man with the pencil and 'making the pencil disappear' he kept his word, creeped out the mob bosses, and showed them that he could predict their movements in the traditional joker fashion.

Honestly, it was my favourite scene in the movie.

and what, Saturday, 19 July 2008 15:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Pencil trick ruled yes. When I went, it was a gasp swiftly followed by nervous laughter. can't wait when the clip of this inevitably shows up on youtube so you could play it over and over and over.

Second favourite is the Joker dancing on top of the pyramid of cash and then he slides down the pyramid, cause it looks like it could have been a scene from the animated series.

Roz, Saturday, 19 July 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Best scene (shot, I guess) in the movie: without a doubt the Joker riding in the police car, hanging out the window, mugging for nobody, then silently closing his eyes and taking in the air. Fabulous.

Also, if I were Ledger I would have purposely kept fucking up the pile of money scene so I could keep sliding down it. That shit must have been fun.

Kath, Saturday, 19 July 2008 16:11 (fifteen years ago) link

That scene in the police car (which appeared in the trailer) was one that made me really excited about the movie. definite OTM

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link

whaddaya know.. pencil trick already up on youtube, most likely not for long. cellphone cam quality, natch.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=szjKxptMLfA

Roz, Saturday, 19 July 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link

people were cheering at this movie, goodness.

when's this out on blu ray then?

Ste, Saturday, 19 July 2008 21:11 (fifteen years ago) link

after I saw this last night I had a dream that my penis was a talking Samurai sword that quoted the works of Thoreau......

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 21:16 (fifteen years ago) link

that happened to me after Cop and a Half

latebloomer, Saturday, 19 July 2008 21:24 (fifteen years ago) link

haha, they held auditions for that little kid's part here in Universal Orlando...ya know, back when that stuff still happened here in O-town

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 19 July 2008 21:27 (fifteen years ago) link

The entire theater here also cheered and laughed at the pencil trick, but my biggest cheer was when Gordon came back and arrested the Joker. I was genuinely shocked when he "died" and completely bowled over when he came back. (Also I am a Gary Oldman fangirl bigtime)

The main discussion after the movie for us was regarding the next villain...we were thinking Catwoman since the next movie by default will be missing a main female?

and why are people marking spoilers...this is a thread about a movie that has already come out...if anyone who hasn't seen TDK and doesn't want to know what happens comes here and reads the recent posts, they get what they deserve.

musically, Sunday, 20 July 2008 01:44 (fifteen years ago) link

And it's #1 on the IMDB top 250, a ranking which I am sure will never down.

musically, Sunday, 20 July 2008 01:46 (fifteen years ago) link

not until the next Resident Evil movie comes out, at least

latebloomer, Sunday, 20 July 2008 03:20 (fifteen years ago) link

and why are people marking spoilers...this is a thread about a movie that has already come out...if anyone who hasn't seen TDK and doesn't want to know what happens comes here and reads the recent posts, they get what they deserve

not in the uk it isn't you selfish bastard.

Ste, Sunday, 20 July 2008 11:05 (fifteen years ago) link

i think UK readers would still be aware that people might just possibly want to discuss details of the plot in the first week after the film came out in the US. anyone reading a thread on a film that's out in either the US or the UK and not expecting spoilers is pretty crazy.

toby, Sunday, 20 July 2008 12:11 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought it was internet polite to add spoiler warnings to such things.

Ste, Sunday, 20 July 2008 12:25 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it is (and my bad again for not marking mine bigger)...I know if I was reading through this thread and the movie wasn't out where I lived, I'd be looking for the spoiler tag to determine which messages to skip

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 20 July 2008 13:39 (fifteen years ago) link

And it's #1 on the IMDB top 250

I'm shocked.

Eric H., Sunday, 20 July 2008 14:01 (fifteen years ago) link

It would be nice if everyone would leave off with the spoilers at least until after the opening weekend, no matter what the movie is.

Rock Hardy, Sunday, 20 July 2008 14:06 (fifteen years ago) link

Honestly, it was my favourite scene in the movie.

Everyone keeps raving about the pencil thing and it was the one time I had to use the bathroom so I missed it argh.

Ok, this was even better than I thought it would be.

ENBB, Sunday, 20 July 2008 14:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Best scene (shot, I guess) in the movie: without a doubt the Joker riding in the police car, hanging out the window, mugging for nobody, then silently closing his eyes and taking in the air. Fabulous.

did that remind anyone else of a scene from Basquiat? (i haven't seen it for years but them in a jeep with the pogues playing?)

anyway this movie was great....one review i read compared it to more of a departed/untouchables type thing but with superheroes which i thought was pretty dead on.

i'm just SO PISSED at that guy for dying. honestly, it's almost like the movie's biggest fault for me was the whole meta-ledger death was something that kept taking me out of the film, because every time he did something great i kept thinking "what a shame"...not that it's the film's fault, but it's THERE i couldn't help it.

but really it's a fine fine film.

M@tt He1ges0n, Sunday, 20 July 2008 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link

yea, I did that too. it's really unavoidable.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 20 July 2008 16:17 (fifteen years ago) link

oh noes sorry guys about the whole spoiler thing. It's out here in Australia, and back home in Malaysia, so I just assumed it had a global release. Didn't know there was a different one for the UK.

Roz, Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

or anywhere else for that matter.

Roz, Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:25 (fifteen years ago) link

Against the whole no spoiler thing, I haven't seen anyone who hasn't seen it post anything other than annoyance at spoilers - which suggests that it would be better to just get on with discussion.

toby, Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:42 (fifteen years ago) link

But this is all besides the point, obv, and I'll drop it now.

toby, Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman’s ‘Dark Night’ Sets Weekend Record

G00blar, Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:45 (fifteen years ago) link

A very dark night.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, one of the local reviewers mentioned that this wasn't the best superhero movie ever, but one of the best crime dramas in quite some time.

kingfish, Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

boxofficemojo is apparently geting pretty slammed right now. i'm getting server errors and "LAST UPDATED: 12/31/1969"

kingfish, Sunday, 20 July 2008 18:00 (fifteen years ago) link

OK, before the movie where I saw it, they had one of those dumbass trivia question loops running, and one required you to guess who said a particular quite: "Life is hard. After all, kills you." I yelled, "Heath Ledger!" Too soon?

Pancakes Hackman, Sunday, 20 July 2008 19:52 (fifteen years ago) link

no way dude that was so fucking awesome that you said that. thanks on behalf of everyone.

M@tt He1ges0n, Sunday, 20 July 2008 20:12 (fifteen years ago) link

this movie fuckin stunk. fuck chris nolan and fuck hans zimmer.

roy division, Sunday, 20 July 2008 20:17 (fifteen years ago) link

chaki otm

and what, Sunday, 20 July 2008 20:44 (fifteen years ago) link

haha

M@tt He1ges0n, Sunday, 20 July 2008 21:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Bale's batman voice = Nathan Explosion from Metalocalypse. You heard it here first.

-- Kath, Saturday, July 19, 2008 3:32 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Link

it borders on harvey fierstein @ times..so terrible

what did people think of the score? some was really overbearing i thought (esp. first like 20 minutes); other parts were v. good, im thinking the more "noise" sections that reminded me of a woman in the dunes

johnny crunch, Monday, 21 July 2008 01:11 (fifteen years ago) link

it wasn't bad, I thought the funniest moment was.. someone asks the Joker whether he thinks he's just going to steal all their money or something & he's like, "uh, yeah?" there were a few extremely lame moments that annoyed me. I thought eckhart was pretty great. was the mayor wearing eyeliner? that was cool.

Major Crimes? Sheeeeeeeeeeeeit.

daria-g, Monday, 21 July 2008 02:42 (fifteen years ago) link

The mayor (Nestor Carbonell) always looks like he's wearing eyeliner. Especially as Richard Alpert on Lost.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 21 July 2008 02:44 (fifteen years ago) link

I like the batman voice. It sounds like me if I had to be as deep and gruff.

CaptainLorax, Monday, 21 July 2008 03:02 (fifteen years ago) link

I still think Gotham Central needs to be a fucking TV series.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 21 July 2008 03:07 (fifteen years ago) link

the mayor was really good! (eyeliner notwithstanding)

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 21 July 2008 03:42 (fifteen years ago) link

BATMANUEL

BLACK BEYONCE, Monday, 21 July 2008 04:12 (fifteen years ago) link

lol

anyway, this was great. i really got into the overserious heavyosity of it. there was so much EXCESS, like the solution to movie making problems is always to have more and more of everything, more violence and politics and love stories and psychology and gadgets and big speeches and moral dilemmas and on and on and on.

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 04:17 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the haters of this movie (thinking basically of denby and a. white here) who have got their panties in a bunch about a humble comic book film deigning to take on the apocalypse now mantle or whatever, are just kind of stuck. like, it doesn't take any critical work at all to pick out the politics and the thematic stuff about identity and legitimacy and the purposes of violence and law and all that -- all that shit is broadcast in the loudest way possible. where's the critical fun in that?

it'd be one thing to make strong reading that uh fantastic four: rise of the silver surfer is a set of interlocking parables about force, order, and civic responsibility or whatever, but tDK is practically begging every last punter to read it that way in every scene -- there's basically no subtext to this movie at all and therefore nothing for a poor critic to do boo hoo

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 04:27 (fifteen years ago) link

let me say 'or whatever' a few more times

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 04:27 (fifteen years ago) link

where's the critical fun in that?

True enough. I had my own thoughts.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 July 2008 05:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Was Michael Bay's "Dark Knight" script linked to here yet? BBCode is hassling me about the URL so here it is: http://my.spill.com/profiles/blog/show%3Fid%3D947994%3ABlogPost%3A355506

musically, Monday, 21 July 2008 05:10 (fifteen years ago) link

that's a pretty convincing negative review you wrote there, goole. unless your idea of fun is being hit over the head by something!

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 21 July 2008 05:29 (fifteen years ago) link

sometimes it is!

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 05:36 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean, led zeppelin weren't subtle either.

some ppl seem to be complaining that this movie tries to do too much and lays it all on too thick -- i don't think they are seeing something that isn't there, i just think those things are good, in this case.

funny, i like my talky human story type movies to be focused and tightly made (before sunset = awes, magnolia = straight garbage), but i have always liked it when big-budget summer movies try to "make people think". it's easy to find that sort of thing tedious and even condescending, i guess, but i love it. if it works.

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 05:44 (fifteen years ago) link

i just think the dialog sucked, the music cues were terrible and the ending was underwhelming. did anyone actually care when rachel died?

roy division, Monday, 21 July 2008 05:46 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the batman cared

BLACK BEYONCE, Monday, 21 July 2008 06:02 (fifteen years ago) link

did anyone actually care when rachel died?

sure!

sean gramophone, Monday, 21 July 2008 06:20 (fifteen years ago) link

I cared enough to keep thinking she was actually alive, and then the end of the film came and I was all "WTF"

Johnny Fever, Monday, 21 July 2008 06:27 (fifteen years ago) link

I saw it last yesterday. I liked it, but two things struck me:

1)Gotham City. Remember the first two movies, and parts of the last, where Gotham seemed like this awesome alternative reality New York City? Now it just looks like a city. Wasn't this shot in Chicago? It doesn't look like Gotham. It looks like Chicago.

2)The batman voice has gotten really, really bad. Ruining it for the future bad.

Z S, Monday, 21 July 2008 06:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, the Bale-Batman growl voice is kind of distracting most of the time. I've got no gripes about the real (and sometimes boring) look of Gotham. The films are already stylized enough with Batman and any villain he comes across as it is.

(Although I did think that for a city the supposed size of Gotham, Gotham General Hospital seemed kind of small)

Johnny Fever, Monday, 21 July 2008 06:39 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't have a problem with the Batman voice because I think of it in the same terms as "Bruce Wayne, Idiotic Playboy Billionaire" in that Wayne isn't all that good at pulling off the masquerade-requiring portions of his life.

en i see kay, Monday, 21 July 2008 07:35 (fifteen years ago) link

the batman animated series pulled off the bw/batman voice change much better.

roy division, Monday, 21 July 2008 07:51 (fifteen years ago) link

I liked the down-to-earth Gotham city. After years of production-designed-to-death Gothams it's a breath of fresh air as far as I'm concerned.

The voice is lame, but whatcha gonna do.

Really my only gripes with this film were some sloppy pacing/editing issues. The plot moves along so fast and there's so much going on that you find yourself wondering, "ok, why are we in this building now?".

latebloomer, Monday, 21 July 2008 10:38 (fifteen years ago) link

watched Begins again last night and found it to be *really* average, (considering i was gushing over it upon it's initial release)

Ste, Monday, 21 July 2008 10:42 (fifteen years ago) link

wtf is up with christian bale's real life accent?

DG, Monday, 21 July 2008 12:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Bale & Nolan are going to be on NPR's Fresh Air today.

kingfish, Monday, 21 July 2008 14:11 (fifteen years ago) link

unless your idea of fun is being hit over the head by something!

usually, i completely hate that but somehow I found it acceptable when it hit you over the head with way too many things and confusing plot twists to spend much time bothering to dwell on one Big Idea. i guess that might be a fault but i saw it just the opposite.

daria-g, Monday, 21 July 2008 16:37 (fifteen years ago) link

my wife and i had a serious discussion after the movie about whether the batman voice is just bruce wayne talking with a raspy voice or whether the batsuit has some kind of voice modulation system built in.

n/a, Monday, 21 July 2008 16:43 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm not reading this thread, but generally i thought the movie was a fairly average summer popcorn movie, with the exception of ledger, who was great. i wished it was rated r, because it was weird how the movie kept getting scary and tense and then cutting away at the moment of actual violence. also it got better as it went, first half seemed really compressed and overedited

n/a, Monday, 21 July 2008 16:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Nolan on KCRW's The Treatment this week too.

Eazy, Monday, 21 July 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

i wished it was rated r, because it was weird how the movie kept getting scary and tense and then cutting away at the moment of actual violence

^yeah this. i made the same statement essentially. cutting was too harried.

johnny crunch, Monday, 21 July 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

it still felt pretty brutal. actually showing dudes throats/cheeks getting slashed might have been a bit much?

Jordan, Monday, 21 July 2008 17:41 (fifteen years ago) link

a few ppl have said this is the most ridiculous "pg-13" movie ever, and that's right on. no swearing or boobs, but a knife goes into a dude's mouth once every 17 minutes or so, christ

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 17:46 (fifteen years ago) link

You know, I just saw "Hellboy 2" a few days before "The Dark Knight." Both are films with (basically) no blood, boobs or bad words that got PG-13s. And yet, "Hellboy" should have been PG (no doubt the PG-13 came from the presence of the word "hell" in the title) and, as far as these things go, "Dark Knight" should probably have been an R. I mean, jeez, "Once" was rated R! "Dark Night" was "Silence of the Lambs" sick and sadistic, albeit mostly off-screen.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 July 2008 19:05 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't like how in scenes with the two ferries the movie teeters on nihilism, then timidly pulls back. It's all of a piece with the way in which it uses violence for kicks and thrills, as if all that You Complete Me stuff provided a moral carapace for Nolan's sadism.

Fans have been hungering for a Batman film they think they deserve for so long that I can understand the enthusiasm for this one, but it's not for me. The film's a dishonest piece of filmmaking. And what on EARTH convinced them to rate this a PG-13???

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:35 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it's more complicated than blaming it all on Nolan.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:39 (fifteen years ago) link

What do you mean by dishonest?

Jordan, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Man, there are always two things that get my hackles up:

1. Terrifying: Unsafe driving! I can't even WATCH people play GTA bcz of this. I think this, of all things in the movie, put me on the edge of my seat. (Of course this is my own little ting.)

2. Heartbreaking: exploitation of the mentally ill. Him sewing a phone into a schizophrenic guy made me way more distressed than psych-101-text ship duel.

That said, I liked this movie quite a bit. I think Joker should have been in the nurse dress the whole time, tho.

Also, Alfred OTM on another 'wtf?' moment from the MPAA. Some people had brought their four-year-old kids!

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Wz Harvey Dent's face CG? If so, oh man, A+ jobs.

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Comics movies aren't just for kids anymore!

Oilyrags, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:56 (fifteen years ago) link

It wants to make a statement on The Darkness Within, but seems more interested in the knives and subtly moving us to sympathize with the Joker, if only because he's more interesting than boring old Bale (Batman is a TOTAL cipher here), and the expository speeches that pile up like the corpses at the conclusion don't help.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:57 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't think he was one whit sympathetic. I think this may be due to my rock-solid "no jerkwads" policy.

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, I can't be the only one who thought jokers lip-licking and -smacking looked like lingering tardive dyskinesia, can I? I've read a lot of references to that little tic being an expression of his sadism, but none that picked up on it being a suggestion that he was heavily medicated for a long time at some point in his past.

Oilyrags, Monday, 21 July 2008 21:59 (fifteen years ago) link

i just figured it was a side effect of having a cut up mouth

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:02 (fifteen years ago) link

I think he would have had more body tics, but if that was meant to be TDKs, I'm really impressed! I can't believe, tho, that he wasn't being pumped full of adavan (atavan?) and geodon at every venture and arrest. It's what they do to anyone even mildly crazy-seeming!

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Srsly I mean they would have thrown that dude on 1000 mg Seroqueal STAT.

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:04 (fifteen years ago) link

that's the point of the joker! he was genuinely scary in this but also, you know, funny and clever.

xp

Jordan, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:04 (fifteen years ago) link

that's the point of the joker! he was genuinely scary in this but also, you know, funny and clever.

It's the Clockwork Orange Effect again: the villain is so seductive that it throws the movie out of whack.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I beat this into the ground in my blog, admittedly, but I think it's less throwing the movie out of whack than it is the audience (potentially).

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:08 (fifteen years ago) link

they should have told ledger to act worse

n/a, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't know, Alex the Droog was given a lot more facetime doing his ordinary things, having things he loved in life besides wanton anarchy. And he actually had a downfall, a chance to ponder what his life is/was all about. He had joy in music, and in women (for better or for worse). Joker was just an amoral killing machine, one note sadist. I mean, an interesting & novel sadist to be sure, but not a sympathetic one IMO.

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:09 (fifteen years ago) link

He's a complete unreliable narrator, too, which gave me a harder time being like, 'Wow, what a shitty life' rather than 'Wow, what a shitty dude.'

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:10 (fifteen years ago) link

I understand. I'm trying to figure out why this movie had me in so many knots, and why the violence repelled me. I don't think Nolan is resourceful enough as a director or writer to tease the ambiguities without relying on monologues. It's far from a great movie, but Iron Man did a better job with its geopolitical subplot. (xxpost)

Joker was just an amoral killing machine, one note sadist.

So was Alex in the movie!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:11 (fifteen years ago) link

I thought Alex was a lot more complex at least. Not that I'm #1 Droog Devotchka here.

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:12 (fifteen years ago) link

batman villains have always been more colorful and sympathetic than batman. but i agree, there is almost zero comic relief in this movie, so it's kind of disturbing to only laugh at the joker while he's pulling off some violent shit.

xxxxp

Jordan, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think Nolan is resourceful enough as a director or writer to tease the ambiguities without relying on monologues

I think the monologues were a cover in the end -- maybe an unintentional one but even so.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:13 (fifteen years ago) link

'clockwork orange effect'?? this is a charge that's been leveled at paradise lost, othello, all kinds of stuff, hell, even schindler's list! ralph fiennes is better than liam neeson, sorry! in any case, i don't buy it, the aesthetic power of a bad guy doesn't change the moral logic at all. are you going to shoot up your school, alfred?

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:14 (fifteen years ago) link

"Did you ever dance...? with the devil...? in the pale moonlight? PS I made Harvey Dent bonkers."

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:14 (fifteen years ago) link

the little jokes about bruce wayne hanging out with hot chicks (what did alfred say after bruce left him on the boat with the Russians btw?) or the exchange after the lamboghini crash really stuck out, b/c this was not a one-liner kind of movie.

Jordan, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:15 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't buy it, the aesthetic power of a bad guy doesn't change the moral logic at all. are you going to shoot up your school, alfred?

You didn't read my post and what I said about the hero.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, they pretty much screamed "Bruce Wayne: kind of a prick!" to me.

xp

Abbott, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:17 (fifteen years ago) link

well you're right, it was an xp

xp again

goole, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:19 (fifteen years ago) link

but that's not the real bruce wayne, i mean if people knew that he was intense and humorless then they might suspect he was batman.

Jordan, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:19 (fifteen years ago) link

actually it kind of bothered me that he let those partygoers see him go into his little secret passage. since batman showed up a minute later, wouldn't they wonder?!

Jordan, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:20 (fifteen years ago) link

okay I don't know what it is, but I LOVE the Joker - even in the 1989 "Batman", loved the Joker (I would scrawl "Joker was Here" almost everywhere when I was 9 years old). So, in viewing this, I found myself consistently rooting for the Joker instead of Batman.

homosexual II, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:26 (fifteen years ago) link

I was rooting for Ed Koch

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:28 (fifteen years ago) link

by the time the Joker got to his umpteenth retelling of his creation story (very ably handled, by the way), I was ready for him to say, "I was fishin' buddies with this cowboy. I couldn't quit'em, so he had to stick me."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:28 (fifteen years ago) link

Jordan, Alfred said "What's Russian for 'apply your own bloody sunscreen'" or something very close to that. I remember it because my friends and I were some of the only people who laughed at that line.

en i see kay, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:28 (fifteen years ago) link

alfred, lord custos

n/a, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I think Cillian Murphy is generally considered the best looking actor of his generation. Ally's views are to be treated as that of a dangerous maverick.
-- Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 1 August 2006

the pinefox, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:34 (fifteen years ago) link

weird things upthread

the pinefox, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:34 (fifteen years ago) link

xp What about Bruce rescuing those cops who were tied and gagged in that apartment? Kind of conspicuous, no?

Really, the nitpicks I have with this one are minor, save the Lower Wacker car chase. "Go to the lower level!?!? We'll be sitting ducks!" Um, yeah.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:46 (fifteen years ago) link

this was true:

So, I finally got around to seeing Batman: Mask of the Phantasm last night. I'm not sure if it's as great as some have hyped it to me, but it's really more solid than a lot of the 90s Batman films and does some interesting rewriting of the Batman origin story including a romantic interest that's scripted more maturely than other film versions, and it's in a cartoon! The whole thing reminded me how great the Batman animated series was.

-- mh, Tuesday, 19 June 2007

the pinefox, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:47 (fifteen years ago) link

My guess is Dark Knight will only give us Two-Face's origin story (since in the trailers Eckhart is only shown as Dent, not as Two-Face), and he will be a more prominent villain in the possible future Batman movies.
-- Tuomas, Thursday, 3 July 2008

the pinefox, Monday, 21 July 2008 22:53 (fifteen years ago) link

this movie woulda been even awesomer if General Zod appeared in a crossover classic.............

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Monday, 21 July 2008 23:26 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought i posted this earlier, but they totally should've gotten the animated series dude (kevin conroy) to do the batvoice.

Jordan, Monday, 21 July 2008 23:31 (fifteen years ago) link

xp What about Bruce rescuing those cops who were tied and gagged in that apartment? Kind of conspicuous, no?

he left their blindfolds on though, didn't he?

musically, Monday, 21 July 2008 23:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, he just took the gag off of one of them. Next time I see it, I'll try to remember to see if he uses his Batvoice when he talks to them.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 00:20 (fifteen years ago) link

He did.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 00:22 (fifteen years ago) link

I liked this movie quite a lot. Very long, yes. But the action was often interesting, tense, suspenseful - I suppose *exciting* was the word.

What I most didn't like about it: so much extremity (violence and desperation) that was then sort of forgotten by characters 5 minutes later. eg: joke's mad death race with truck, most dangerous person on the planet - they put him in a cell ... then leave him with some cop and an easy way to get out? why? why not ... lock the cell?

Or: that whole truck death race was to save Harvey Dent in the truck. so as soon as they get him out, they ... stick him in an anonymous car driven by someone nobody notices or recognizes. It matters (if any of it matters) cos this how he gets caught and turned into Two-Face.

or even, earlier: Police Commissioner killed by terribly dangerous, omnipresent gang of villains - so what do they do? hold huge parade down a street full of sniper positions, get whole police force in a place where they (+ mayor, Gordon, Dent, et al) are vulnerable to villains. I don't think so.

and: Joke so dangerous, has escaped Gotham Central. Batman has already shown he can't kill him. After all that desperate chasing around they are back to square one, just watching him blow up hospitals etc and clearing up the mess ... and they just keep pursuing Joker, but to what end? don't they think it'll just end up the same way? Bats still won't be able to kill Joker, and we have seen Joker escape already. but Bats keeps trying to confront Joker.

or: scene with pile of cash that Joker burns - after everything Joker has done, practically blowing up whole city, local mobster squares up to him and sneers at him as pathetic freak or something. ?? this is like some knife gangster from Deptford going toe to toe with Osama bin Laden. again: I don't think so.

and: given how many times Joker is in a disguise, or someone gets into a car and gets abducted, or a place turns out to be mined with bombs or whatever - frustrating that they keep letting the same things happen - don't seem to learn that the world around them is dangerous. comical at one point when Bats sends Gordon a text message saying 'watch out'. no kidding!

I didn't like Joker's speeches about anarchy, 'you're a freak like me', all that nonsense. People go on about the Bats = Joker line but it doesn't add up. He's not like the Joker - he's incredibly virtuous, is constantly doing good. This is very different from constantly trying to kill innocent people. Sure, by real-world logic someone in a Batman costume wld seem odd. But in a world in which Batman exists, and can do what he does, and has shown his powers etc, he wldn't seem like a 'costumed freak' anymore. But anyway, all Joker's talk about pro-Anarchy, anti-Planning = utter hokum as he has by far the most complex Plans of anyone in the picture. I can only excuse this as lies that he tells Dent to try to make him go bad. And he succeeds. Wld Dent really go out to kill innocent people, like Gordon's family? I don't see it - can't see the motivation working in that way. OK, so it's all hokum, a fellow with half his face blown off. But aren't we also supposed to be taking it Seriously, somehow?

And the ending, where Bats says he will take responsibility for deaths and is thus 'hunted' - he doesn't need to! why not just let it be understood that these people died in Joker-related violence?

That seems like a long list of things I didn't like. Things I did like, though:
- action etc as above
- Batman voice fine by me, funny.
- Bruce Wayne with chicks, quite a droll spectacle really.
- Maggie Gyllenhall looks very good! I don't get people that don't like her. when she was interrogating the Chinese accountant geezer I loved watching her
- Bats in Hong Kong - kind of like an acceptable version of James Bond, or M-I.
- opening bank heist with Joker + clowns told to kill each other - good actually, I think
- in general, the film much more of a Police Procedural than a Superhero picture, at times. I have never seen THE WIRE but my guess is that this was an attempt to make a Batman film somewhat like that. Or maybe ALLY MCBEAL.
- I just really liked Batman! with his great virtue, realiability, proficiency, infinite skill, Batmobile, motorbike, incorrigibility - he was terrific to watch! and every time he shows up in a scene (including suddenly the one where Jokes is interrogated), it's really exciting!

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 00:23 (fifteen years ago) link

golly, I have written Joker as Joke and even Jokes, above. J0eks, bro, J0kes.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 00:26 (fifteen years ago) link

I liked Maggie Gyllenhaal too: a welcome no-nonsense presence.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 00:30 (fifteen years ago) link

In the "Fresh Air" interview, Bale says that really was him standing up on the edge of the Sears Tower in the Batsuit. Was that overhead shot one of the ones shot with Imax cameras?

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 00:38 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the haters of this movie (thinking basically of denby and a. white here) who have got their panties in a bunch about a humble comic book film deigning to take on the apocalypse now mantle or whatever, are just kind of stuck. like, it doesn't take any critical work at all to pick out the politics and the thematic stuff about identity and legitimacy and the purposes of violence and law and all that -- all that shit is broadcast in the loudest way possible. where's the critical fun in that?

It's definitely no fun to criticize filmmakers for making the mistakes of their predecessors.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 01:25 (fifteen years ago) link

One great bit of poetry: Ledger's sashay in the nurse's uniform, as the hospital explodes. My God, it was Tati-esque.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 01:31 (fifteen years ago) link

That whole sequence, really. Especially when you think he's going to do the 'walk away while things blow up' bit in full but then nothing happens and he gets all annoyed.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 01:33 (fifteen years ago) link

yes!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 01:36 (fifteen years ago) link

The sad thing about Ledger's death is that as an actor he was learning how to move in character. So few of the young 'uns did it, and in this, the middling Casanova, and BBM he was developing a talent for it.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 01:41 (fifteen years ago) link

"I want my phonecall...I want it. I want my phonecall"

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 01:49 (fifteen years ago) link

I'd like to watch this again or go over the script to really break it down, but one of the reasons the Joker is so appealing is he's confident in what he's doing. Watching Bruce Wayne, philanthropic billionaire superhero, question his own worth is some tedious shit. That's what lesser characters like Rachel "Impartial System" Dawes are for.

Kerm, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 02:00 (fifteen years ago) link

I just really liked Batman! with his great virtue, realiability, proficiency, infinite skill, Batmobile, motorbike, incorrigibility - he was terrific to watch!

I just have to say i loved this...what a succinct way to sum up the appeal of a superhero!

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 04:20 (fifteen years ago) link

kerm - i think watching bruce wayne worry about that is not interesting, and the idea that he'd quit and turn himself in despite all the high minded stuff he said, that is kind of BS too. i'm really ambivalent about all these superhero movies anyway because i usually find them fundamentally reactionary so i tend to like this because it's a mess. imho watching bruce wayne show up with yet another woman used as set decoration is also tedious, so sure thing his other neuroses are likely to be. armond white's review is fun..

Ever since Frank Miller’s 1986 graphic-novel reinvention, The Dark Knight Returns, pop consumers have rejected traditional moral verities as corny.

OK but i reject them as patriarchal and Republican? :) that said in a vague way i did think there were some positive things, something about the public sphere, like when the mayor and other officials all marched in the streets for that funeral.. I can't believe I'm thinking this much about it but could probably have written a term paper on dent/two face and public life versus private life and theorize that the one doesn't affect the other so the city leaders were perfectly correct in applauding what he did in office. still think dent was the most interesting character in the movie.

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 04:31 (fifteen years ago) link

but the low- and high-pitched electronic drones worked REALLY well! sort of lynchian--they were clearly not coming from anything IN the film, but they weren't exactly proper "scoring" either.

It seemed a mite There Will Be Blood to me. I wouldn't be surprised if that was actually an influence.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 05:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Wow, went to see another movie at a neighborhood 4-plex -- tonight's Dark Knight shows were sold out (even 10 p.m.) and folks were buying tickets for tomorrow night.

Eazy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 05:21 (fifteen years ago) link

I just wrote a big long spiel on the Stylus board about how Bruce Wayne is a nasty violent batshit nutcase rather than a virtuous moral hero, but the server's crashed so I can't C&P it.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 09:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Admittedly, that's based on graphic novels rather than The Dark Knight (which I've not seen yet).

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 09:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Or: that whole truck death race was to save Harvey Dent in the truck. so as soon as they get him out, they ... stick him in an anonymous car driven by someone nobody notices or recognizes. It matters (if any of it matters) cos this how he gets caught and turned into Two-Face.

??? They put him in a cop car, with a cop -- one of the corrupt ones from Gordon's Major Crimes Unit.

Pancakes Hackman, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 10:39 (fifteen years ago) link

I guess that is true. But I don't remember it looking like a cop car. I think they should have flagged this up much more, let us see the driver properly - because later on this becomes a big plot point (WHAT ARE THE NAMES OF THE CORRUPT COPS? etc), but we don't really have any images or sense of those cops to hang it on.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 10:41 (fifteen years ago) link

What I wrote about Batman being a fucknut:

As far as moral ambiguity goes, having just read The Dark Knight Returns, The Long Halloween, and Arkham Asylum, which I gather are possibly the most morally fucked of all Batman stories, I have just one thing to say; Bruce Wayne is a fucking psychopath. Bruce Wayne is 2 millimetres away from being a fucknut crazy costumed psychokiller every bit as bad as The Joker. And that 2 millimetres distance is all posited by his own psyche in the "not killing" thing. He dresses as a bat and beats criminals, who, lest we forget, are often driven to crime by bad social politics rather than being inherently nasty or bad or evil, which (politics) Wayne has no interest in getting involved in (despite his money and potential influence) because he'd rather be a nasty, vengeful motherfucker and beat people the fuck up because HE'S A CRAZY VIOLENT FUCKNUT. But he's delusional; he thinks he's a fucking saint, he thinks he's doing the city (world?) a favour by taking down the bad guys. Only thing is, he;s not; he's attracting worse bad guys, by being a great big fucking blazing sign saying "crazy violent fucknuts are welcome in Gotham". He justifies his own nasty, violent, murderous tendencies not by ignoring or dismissing or sublimating or using them to drive acts of good, but by acting them out without going to far, where the only thing that is too far is killing people. So he hospitalises them. He breaks their ribs. He drives them insane with fear. He ninjas the shit out of them in darkened warehouses. Because he's a fucknut. A crazy batshit fucknut. Where do you think the term 'batshit' came from?

The appealing thing about him is that... we all... or a lot of us, at least, have these same violent impulses. When some chav cunt cuts me up in his Max Powered shag wagon car, spilling fumes all over my road, his basebal cap on backwards and his next date-rape victim in his sights, I wish I had a Glock with a silencer in my glove compartment and could cap the little fucker's head off, or cut off his balls so he can't spawn more little social-Darwinist survival-of-the-most-promiscuous-nasty-little-date-rapists spawn to further fuck-up our world. Because, though I may vote liberal and work in education and have gay and black and asian friends and listen to jazz and eat 'world cuisine', at some level, I am a Frank Miller-esque fascist and I want to see scum cleaned up because it's easier than creating / enabling a world that discourages scum from existing. Judge Dredd. Batman. Judge Dredd is just the ultimate acceptance that Batman is more effective than the police who are more effective than benevolent social policy. Batman is the crazy little fucked-up black heart, the ticking mind-clock of batshit violence. Batman is the cunt-kicking, scum-punching, impulse-accepting twitch in all of us. He could go off any minute. he lives in a shitty world and he feels guilty for being above it in his beautiful big old golden palace of Wayne Manor, and his parents may be dead but SUCH PRIVILEGE, AND I'M STILL NOT HAPPY, WHAT'S WRONG WITH ME??!! So he snaps, he breaks, he goes and ninjas fuck out of all the things he can't fix through love, because he doesn't understand love. If only he'd been bought a kitten, he'd be OK.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:36 (fifteen years ago) link

He dresses as a bat and beats criminals, who, lest we forget, are often driven to crime by bad social politics rather than being inherently nasty or bad or evil

aw, c'mon. what superhero film has ever pretended to be a kitchen sink social study?

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:41 (fifteen years ago) link

X-Men. Watchmen. Fantastic Four. Most of them, actually, in one way or another.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:47 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that's a load of bollocks. Batman is a hero.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Also incredibly cliched bollox, like 6th-form fanzine c.1988 bollox ... Martin Skidmore was probably turning down crappy submissions like this 20 years ago.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:50 (fifteen years ago) link

22 years ago 'crappy submissions' like this were being written by Frank Miller. Batman, as I understand him as portrayed by Nolan and the source material Nolan has gone for, is a violent nutcase. Yes, he has 'good intentions' but so do lots of psychos, I'm sure. Batman as total, 100% hero is just as cliched.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 11:53 (fifteen years ago) link

in a two hour movie about a man in a cape with lots of cool gadgets and vehicles, where you have to cram in a villain or two with backstory, is it really a fair/valid criticism to say 'we didn't get enough explanation of WHY the violent henchman is a violent henchman! Who's the REAL victim here, people?'.

it's not really why people go to see a batman movie, is it?

batman, in miller's works as far as i've read them, is far from accepted universally as a 100% sane and admirable hero.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:03 (fifteen years ago) link

batman has always been more of a necessary evil kind of hero, which is why he's much more interesting than, say, superman.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, one thing emphasized in some comics (although this doesn't appear in DK, AA or LH) Bruce Wayne in his public persona is indeed a shiftless layabout - but that's a disguise too! He works behind the scenes through proxies on social programs like free clinics, underprivileged youth, all levels of education, etc. He's careful about the social and political implications of the corporate activity he funds (Lex Luthor has been a rival in this respect.) And so on. This has nothing to do with the movie, of course, which def. tries to have its cake and eat it too by having Wayne recognize Batman as a totally fucking fascist thing that he wants to step away from, but also gives him all the best clothes, chicks and toys.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:23 (fifteen years ago) link

In the film the chicks are clearly a decoy - there is no evidence that BW does anything with them except stepping out of choppers. Maybe I'm wrong - maybe he is supposed actually to be a womanizer? I didn't really get that impression; he seems hung up on Rachel D anyway.

The word 'fascist' is very carelessly thrown around in discussions like this. Fascism arguably involves a strong state, military spending, law & order, patriotism, perhaps the persecution of minorities. Batman's heroic-crime-fighting-outlaw-secret-identity-vigilante-(who doesn't kill or use a gun) doesn't really have much to do with that, I don't think.

A lame source, perhaps, but the wiki entry on fascism:

"Fascism is a term used to describe authoritarian nationalist political ideologies or mass movements that are concerned with notions of cultural decline or decadence and seek to achieve a millenarian national rebirth by exalting the nation or race, and promoting cults of unity, strength and purity. ... but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: patriotism, nationalism, statism, militarism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, economic planning (including corporatism and autarky), populism, collectivism, autocracy and anti-liberalism (i.e., opposition to political and economic liberalism)."

Most of that has very little to do with Batman, I think. It would make as much sense to call Superman a fascist icon (he's more 'patriotic', after all - Batman almost never refers to America or the nation) - but it probably wouldn't be worth doing that either.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Okay, fascism maybe isn't exactly accurate. But he's still a wealthy and powerful guy using his own resources to impose his vision of social order by circumventing the legal and political systems. That's not exactly truth justice and the american way.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Your last point is part of my point: 'truth, justice and the American way' sounds more like a fascist slogan than anything Batman has ever said.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:47 (fifteen years ago) link

In the film the chicks are clearly a decoy - there is no evidence that BW does anything with them except stepping out of choppers. Maybe I'm wrong - maybe he is supposed actually to be a womanizer? I didn't really get that impression; he seems hung up on Rachel D anyway.

this was explained as decoy behaviour in the first nolan batman.

legal system != justice, hence dark, violent, vigilante satisfying superheroes.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 12:47 (fifteen years ago) link

batman's big i'm-watching-you computer is admirably 'fascist' or at least orwellian (i guess those are difft things)

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:07 (fifteen years ago) link

people are saying pretty otm things. bale/batman is pretty boring, not particularly sympathetic. joker is fantastic, and far more interesting. maggie g is great. and cute. oldman is similarly good (as usual).

this is really stunning on imax

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Results 1 - 10 of about 97,700 for frank miller fascist. (0.24 seconds)

http://goodcomics.blogspot.com/2006/02/why-frank-miller-is-fascist-writer.html

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:11 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought there were some missteps--overwrought, not-particularly-well-thought-out speeches and dialogue about justice, truth, heroism chief among them--but the filmmaking was so tight and well-paced that i didnt care (or, just as soon as i was getting really annoyed with some bit of dialogue, theyd cut to a sweeping shot of the city)

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Results 1 - 10 of about 2,210,000 for batman comic. (0.31 seconds)

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:14 (fifteen years ago) link

You genuinely thought this movie was well-paced, max? It turned downright slovenly in the last 45 minutes.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:15 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah by well-paced i mostly meant just as soon as i was getting really annoyed with some bit of dialogue, theyd cut to a sweeping shot of the city--the end drags on a little long and once joker is out of the picture i was just sort of zzzzzzzzzzz

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:18 (fifteen years ago) link

has anyone noticed how much better the sequels to most of the recent superhero movies are than the original? spider-man 2, x2, now this? and then the third movie usually sucks.

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:19 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't think either of those films were better than the originals. i didn't see the third of either.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:21 (fifteen years ago) link

I've been thinking about that; my guess is that because each 'first' film almost necessarily needs to deal with the origin of the hero in question, that the first films exist almost from the get-go as introductions before you get to the actual story the director wants to tell. Also, the first film is a training ground for testing out new ideas. By the third film, everyone's too comfortable with what can be done, and so quality control, in the form of "can we manage this?' being answered with "yes" but not countered with "should we bother?", evaporates and "pile on the villains" one-upmanship cuts in, and you get Spidey 3 or The Last Stand.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Does that make sense?

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:22 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah thats what i was thinking too

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:24 (fifteen years ago) link

But anyway, all Joker's talk about pro-Anarchy, anti-Planning = utter hokum as he has by far the most complex Plans of anyone in the picture. I can only excuse this as lies that he tells Dent to try to make him go bad.

i dont remember the speech that well but i thought this was less that joker doesnt have any plans and more that he makes plans without a point--he's less 'anarchic' than he is, like, 'anti-utilitarian' or something. there are no ends in joker's world.

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:27 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe these movies should all be made-for-tv miniseries instead

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:30 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/07/22/bale.questioned.ap/index.html?eref=rss_latest

This is mental if it's true.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:30 (fifteen years ago) link

and you could replicate max's imax experience by sitting really really close to the tv

xpost

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:31 (fifteen years ago) link

haha yes, the cover of today's evening standard says "police question batman"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:32 (fifteen years ago) link

I know he thinks he's a bit method, but this is stupid.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:34 (fifteen years ago) link

would love to see an HBO gotham mcu series, so long as there are super-villains

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:34 (fifteen years ago) link

my guess is that because each 'first' film almost necessarily needs to deal with the origin of the hero in question, that the first films exist almost from the get-go as introductions before you get to the actual story the director wants to tell.

it makes sense, but i think i enjoy the origin part of superhero movies more than the soap opera love stories etc that sequels bring into it.

xpost maybe his mum and sister were planning a heist.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:36 (fifteen years ago) link

"I'm sorry, son, but Heath's performance is just better than yours."

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:36 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe her tea's just not up to alfred's standard.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Entirely possible.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:47 (fifteen years ago) link

still, vigilante tea-inspired punishment beatings? bit much.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:50 (fifteen years ago) link

But he's still a wealthy and powerful guy using his own resources to impose his vision of social order by circumventing the legal and political systems.

Just like everybody else, ever. The purpose of every major character in these stories is to examine which rules stick and when and why to break the rest. Suggesting that a billionaire with nearly limitless resources should be a stickler about adhering to the legal system if he really cares about justice is some blinkered wishful thinking Rachel Dawes shit.

Kerm, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Ken Lay would agree.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:19 (fifteen years ago) link

yes, ken lay was very interested in justice and crimefighting, which is why he's such a popular and fascinating superhero character.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:21 (fifteen years ago) link

maggie g is kinda sexless

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:22 (fifteen years ago) link

likes:

ledger - was concerned he'd be ripping off sociopath performances of filmdom past wholesale but he truly did his own thing. oddly enough, he reminded me only of cagney at certain points. the fact that his performance was one-note (but what a note!) actually helped to keep him from completely running off with the movie. I wasn't thinking "poor dead heath ledger" while watching it, but today I was struck by the fact he *won't* be returning for the sequel, which is total sadface. ah well, at least he left on a high note. joker in nurse outfit blowing up hospital was alltime perverse + delightful.

brought the gritty - much flatter than the previous batman, which suffered from marrying its bleakitude to outlandish, contrived situations. the policier vibe gave this one stronger footing. the relentless pace actually felt relentless.

zeitgeisty - the moral dilemmas of declaring war on terror weren't just superficial frosting, they were baked in. nothing it had to say about the morality of fighting crime was particularly astute (hoary old cop/criminal duality) and perhaps we will look back and laugh but I like the way it continually returned to the topic without getting didactic about it. a little bit of ambivalence goes a long way.

dislikes:

terminator action porn OD: from the supersize-it school of filmmaking. there's more soda in this cup than you could ever possibly drink, but that's okay, it's BETTER cuz there's MORE. around the 37th kidnapping is when I put my head in my hands.

pandering: some of the playing to the crowd was creaky, e.g. editing beats for audience reactions, dorky comic relief, made in china lulz no thanks

batman, why him growl? - okay, I know bale did diff bw/bm voices in the last movie, but this was ridiculous. perhaps it was an attempt to show batman becoming animalistic due to the devolving situation (definitely thought it became more pronounced as the movie went on) but no, that didn't work.

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:25 (fifteen years ago) link

You might wanna check the comments in the link before you respond. Dave Kehr:

“The Dark Knight” is “Dirty Harry” stripped of Don Siegel’s ambivalence and ambiguity. Here again, one madman (Christian Bale’s Batman/Clint Eastwood’s Harry) is posited as the only effective way of combating another (Heath Ledger’s Joker/Andy Robinson’s Scorpio). The two figures are identified as morally equivalent (”You complete me,” says Ledger to Bale, nastily referencing “Jerry Maguire”), but where Siegel’s camera literally recoils in horror at the moment Harry leaps into madness (when he steps on Scorpio’s wound in the football stadium), Nolan seems to embrace, and even romanticize, his hero’s obsessive, abusive behavior. Is the Dark Knight just George Bush with a better outfit, demanding that he be allowed all of the available “tools” to combat terrorism, even if they include torture and eavesdropping? Like Bush, Batman has his own warrantless wiretapping program, but Nolan is kind enough to assure us that, once his goal is accomplished, the superhero will blow it up. Is he suggesting that we can count on the Dark President to do the same?

http://www.davekehr.com/?p=59

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:27 (fifteen years ago) link

Sorry to beat a dead horse but every dramatic hero since the Enlightenment has been free of the normal rules that apply to you and me, by dint of either their profession (cop, private investigator, nobleman, spy, etc) or their criminality (mafiosi, man-on-the-run, etc). It's an interesting rut that Western dramatic writing has gotten itself into, that we can't imagine the sort of heroism we aspire to other than being embodied by someone to whom the normal rules don't apply. Batman is in the basic Scarlet Pimpernel / Zorro mold, a nobleman who disguises himself not so much as to not be caught by the law (since by being noble he is somewhat above the law anyway), but so as to retain his special position in society (and thereby continue his heroic tasks)

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link

Dave Kehr again:

Both the ferry boat and the wrong-rescue scenes are typical of “The Dark Knight”’s strategy of setting up impossible, “Sophie’s Choice”-like moral dilemmas for its hero, and then resolving them through sleight-of-hand: in a bit of reverse racism, a scary-looking black man steps up to make the tough moral choice that a wimpy-looking white guy is unable to handle; Batman arrives to rescue his girl friend, only to find that the Joker has betrayed him (!) and switched locations. In both cases the hero gets to look fine and noble while he wrestles with issues that are then resolved with no moral cost to him. I agree that the movie is not triumphalist, but triumphalism is hardly in style at this point in time. Instead, it substitutes the dark romanticism of the misunderstood outsider, who takes on the sins of the community the better to redeem the poor saps who will remain forever ungrateful to him — a slight improvement over a ticker tape parade finale, but still a self-flattering, adolescent notion.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:36 (fifteen years ago) link

difference being, in real life you have to decide whether or not you trust a vigilante, and wonder what his reasons are.

batman is just a comic book hero, and we know he's the good guy. i don't think the parallel holds up.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:37 (fifteen years ago) link

he used the term "reverse racism" = don't listen to a thing the guy says

goole, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman arrives to rescue his girl friend, only to find that the Joker has betrayed him (!)

is this what happened? maybe i got jumbled, i thought the point was that Batman chose Dent

goole, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:41 (fifteen years ago) link

In real life you have to decide whether or not you trust the rules, too.

Kerm, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:45 (fifteen years ago) link

I said it could be read as a rather sympathetic critique of post-9/ll government overreach in my review. Didn't take that line of thinking as far as Kehr.

x-post

Hubie Brown, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Hand's writing is so good.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:50 (fifteen years ago) link

batman seemed kind of fat and super slow in this. especially when the whole first movie was about how batman is a ninja. he really needs to go up a size in that mask

hytop, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:52 (fifteen years ago) link

the audience in my theatre cheered when gordon reappeared - in this world, the heroes are celebrated just for *surviving*. I guess I'm getting kind of meta about this, but that seems like a low point for comic book heroics. so it's kind of hard to read tdk as a triumphant celebration of bush policies. have the ostensible good guys (and the audience by proxy) ever been so sadistically thrashed during a comic book movie? does anyone walk out of the theatre upbeat + feeling good about the state of gotham (or the world)?

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:01 (fifteen years ago) link

would love to see an HBO gotham mcu series, so long as there are super-villains

max, have you read Gotham Central? if not, you would probably like it!

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:03 (fifteen years ago) link

It took me a while to figure out that wasn't Renee Montoya tagging along with Gordon all the time.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:06 (fifteen years ago) link

have the ostensible good guys (and the audience by proxy) ever been so sadistically thrashed during a comic book movie?

It's difficult to think of any action movie in the last 15-20 years where the hero isn't beaten and bloodied by the end of it. We seem to need our heroes punished, with marks all over their bodies.

Thanks, pinefox.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:08 (fifteen years ago) link

In real life you have to decide whether or not you trust the rules, too.

Kerm, 22 July 2008 14:45 (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

nope. in real life you have to wonder what society is going to do about the people that break/ignore them.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:10 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah, they didn't see her name for awhile and i was sure it was going to be montoya.

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:22 (fifteen years ago) link

You might wanna check the comments in the link before you respond. Dave Kehr:

“The Dark Knight” is “Dirty Harry” stripped of Don Siegel’s ambivalence and ambiguity. Here again, one madman (Christian Bale’s Batman/Clint Eastwood’s Harry) is posited as the only effective way of combating another (Heath Ledger’s Joker/Andy Robinson’s Scorpio). The two figures are identified as morally equivalent (”You complete me,” says Ledger to Bale, nastily referencing “Jerry Maguire”), but where Siegel’s camera literally recoils in horror at the moment Harry leaps into madness (when he steps on Scorpio’s wound in the football stadium), Nolan seems to embrace, and even romanticize, his hero’s obsessive, abusive behavior. Is the Dark Knight just George Bush with a better outfit, demanding that he be allowed all of the available “tools” to combat terrorism, even if they include torture and eavesdropping? Like Bush, Batman has his own warrantless wiretapping program, but Nolan is kind enough to assure us that, once his goal is accomplished, the superhero will blow it up. Is he suggesting that we can count on the Dark President to do the same?

http://www.davekehr.com/?p=59

-- Dr Morbius, Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:27 AM (54 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

did this guy just call obama "the dark president"???

and what, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Like Bush, Batman has his own warrantless wiretapping program

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:25 (fifteen years ago) link

morbz is obsessed with obama saying as president he'd scrap the fisa stuff he voted for

and what, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:28 (fifteen years ago) link

those aren't morbz' words. He's quoting Dave Kehr.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:28 (fifteen years ago) link

I have no idea who Dave Kehr is or if he's obsessed with Obama and FISA.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:29 (fifteen years ago) link

It's difficult to think of any action movie in the last 15-20 years where the hero isn't beaten and bloodied by the end of it. We seem to need our heroes punished, with marks all over their bodies.

like a passion play?

I liked how the Joker was a Satanic kind of figure...his only goal seemed to be bringing out the chaos and rage inside normally virtuous people. It's made quite clear in the movie that he "wins" so long as you stoop to his level--and while this isn't profound or anything I hardly see how it could be seen as a endorsement of Bush-style anti-terrorism policies.

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:31 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.darrenlester.co.uk/images/jpg/emperor3.jpg

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:35 (fifteen years ago) link

which is precisely why batman is "hunted" and dent is lionized--Batman doesn't believe in his own methods!

x-post- haha!

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:35 (fifteen years ago) link

have the ostensible good guys (and the audience by proxy) ever been so sadistically thrashed during a comic book movie?

It's difficult to think of any action movie in the last 15-20 years where the hero isn't beaten and bloodied by the end of it. We seem to need our heroes punished, with marks all over their bodies.

but it's more than just rambo getting a christ-like set of cinematic bruises. besides the physical abuse there are rafts of emotional and mental torments in tdk, the pervasive hopelessness, the poisoning of the innocents.

more anecdote: the woman sitting next to me had her head buried in her hands when twoface was tormenting gordon's family - never saw that at screenings of xmen or hellboy.

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought the point was that Batman chose Dent

-- goole, Tuesday, July 22, 2008 9:41 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

me too

gbx, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link

well he yells "rachel!" when joker tells him the locations, etc, so you can take it either way. I felt like he was going for rachel.

Simon H., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:04 (fifteen years ago) link

I thought gordon asks batman who is he going to save as he's running out the door and batman says rachel. gordon then heads out to save dent. but the joker swapped the addresses on them.

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that is correct - it must be.

I understand how people want to read allegorical comments on geopolitics into films like this, but somehow I find that a dubious exercise.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link

ah so.

missed that.

gbx, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link

> I understand how people want to read allegorical comments on geopolitics into films like this, but somehow I find that a dubious exercise.

If we don't, it's just the latest version of "Driving Fast With Guns" and our egos won't permit us to believe we'd really go for that shit.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:16 (fifteen years ago) link

made in china lulz no thanks

i thought the same thing at first but the whole scene is dent being a totally and completely over the top grandstanding politician, in which case.. makes sense to say that, obnoxious as it is

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:28 (fifteen years ago) link

I agree with a great deal of what Edward III says upthread, not least about '37th kindapping' - excess: precisely.

I don't understand his comment 'made in china lulz'.

I also don't think I can agree that the spectacle of the hospital blowing up was delightful. I think it is disturbing and sad. Just writing the words 'hospital blowing up', and picturing it again, troubles me so. It feels so terrible, wanton and wrong. Yes, the film was showing wanton wrong. But I don't think that can be delightful.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:34 (fifteen years ago) link

i really need to see this again, especially the bit about saving harvey or rachel! i thought it was a head-fake of the movie to let us believe batman was after rachel, and really picking dent, not a trick of the joker's. hmmmm

goole, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link

im agree it's dubious to read geopolitical allegories into the movie...it's definitely to ascribe real-world political opinions to it as well.

that kidnapping scene is interesting....esp if goole is correct, which I think he might be (regardless, batman did choose). Makes one think that if Batman was on one of the boats he wouldn't have had any trouble pushing the button.

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:44 (fifteen years ago) link

definitely dubious, that is.

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link

So how does Christian Bale getting arrested for assaulting his mom and sis play into your analysis?

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link

I understand how people want to read allegorical comments on geopolitics into films like this, but somehow I find that a dubious exercise.

films reflect the national consciousness - why is this not fair game for discussion? it's not different than talking about how easy rider, bonnie & clyde, taxi driver, etc were "of their time".

whatever you think of the quality of the movies, there's been a rash of imperfect superheroes confroting their dark sides - tdk, hancock, iron man, hulk, hellboy. I'd say america has an interesting psychological relationship to heroism at this point in time.

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:48 (fifteen years ago) link

I'll agree we shouldn't "read into" the film tho. more like reading out of it.

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:51 (fifteen years ago) link

the china thing was dent in the courtroom after the witness tries to shoot him, grabbing the gun and making some comment about how that particular one was made in china, and he'd have done better with made in the usa. really cheesy grandstanding

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:51 (fifteen years ago) link

yes, i just think it's maddeningly reductive to need to interpret all narrative art (even didactic narrative art) as having pat political conclusions...like the need to rescue Dirty Harry as politically transgressive in order to make it worth seeing and thinking about.

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link

(sorry Kehr's comment that the camera in DH "recoils in horror" just struck me as wishful thinking!)

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link

i wish they would've shown how the witness got that gun through security.

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

They said it was plastic or ceramic or something, I think.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

oh, i missed that.

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought eckhart was great in that scene actually, all adrenaline and fear turning into the first stupid soundbite he could think of

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:05 (fifteen years ago) link

I tend to view movies from two angles, the aesthetic and the sociological, and these two can (should?) be evaluated independently of each other. that is, the politics of dirty harry has no bearing on its aesthetic effectiveness, but they are both interesting to talk about.

on a related note, regarding the delightful hospital exploding - I'm a more decadent viewer than you pinefox. looking at that scene from a purely aesthetic standpoint, it gave me an imagistic headrush. of course blowing up hospitals is not a very nice thing to do, but casting such concerns at nihilist carnival rides like tdk seems ???

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:12 (fifteen years ago) link

OK, then I liked that scene with the gun. And agree with Max's analysis of it!

This question of 'reading films politically' or whatever is a delicate one. One can start, though, by saying that there is a difference between saying Easy Rider is of its time, and saying that Batman is commentary on the ethics of counter-terrorism. It is roughly, I suppose, the difference between 'reflection' (of history) and 'intention' (of political message).

I suppose some of these pictures are indeed written with 'messages'. So why do I still have a problem with this? Maybe I don't think I quite trust them at that level. I don't think it would be safe to take our political bearings from a narrative like this. OK, nobody here wants to do that. But talking about the film's political implications feels like it might imply that.

I'm just not sure about all this. Star Wars is another interesting case - I always hated attempts to read SW politically, but then Clones / Sith felt pretty thoroughly political, whether of USA 2000s or of Vietnam when they were conceived. And I must admit, I did feel that this added to their force somehow, though it had to remain entirely unspoken to retain that force.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:14 (fifteen years ago) link

[casting such concerns at nihilist carnival rides like tdk seems ???]

-- I don't think I can accept this. Because the film, and talk about it, is full of talk about good and evil, values, choices, dilemmas. We seem to be interested in it on that level (and / or it seems to see itself that way). So can we then say it's a carnival ride, when something horrible happens? Isn't the horror part of the weight of the picture - part of why we (or the city) need Batman to succeed?

It's a bit like how in my first response I was going on about improbabilities, and thinking someone wld say 'hey, it's a film about a giant bat, no wonder it's improbable' - etc. That sounds right - but then, no, the film takes itself more seriously than that. And think of the time and unbelievable money involved. It doesn't then make sense to say none of this matters. If it doesn't matter we shouldn't bother with the movie at all (and many won't, and won't spend their time writing overlong thoughts like this).

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link

legal system != justice
yeah, if that's the case and officially/unofficially they sanction some psycho vigilante instead of doing what they can to fix the legal system, that's a path that makes everything worse IMHO
(i don't know anything about the batman comics besides seeing this movie & the tim burton ones)

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Don Siegel, director of Dirty Harry, made genre films with decidedly non-reactionary political allusions (eg Invasion of the Body Snatchers), and Harry is clearly a less unambiguously "heroic" figure than the Cult of Clint (and sequels) made him out to be. (His throwing his badge away at the end of the film isn't often remembered.) DH critical controversy detailed within:

http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/directors/04/siegel.html

plz buy andwhat some remedial reading lessons, k thx

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm not saying it doesn't matter, but you're holding the film to a higher moral standard than it holds itself. the film is geared to get the audience off on the joker's evil deeds - it's part of the frisson, the sinful deliciousness of bad behavior that we are allowed to witness/condone/participate in as an audience. we can tut-tut and disapprove all of the bad behavior in the film but then you're missing a rather prominent layer of the film, which is entertainment via sadism... something ned touched on above with his (astute) comparison to funny games.

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:26 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost to pinefox

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:26 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm not entertained by sadism, had to look away (well, preferred to look away) during some of the really violent scenes, and kept getting stuck on little moments of "that's racist, that is so xenophobic." couldn't turn it off.

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:32 (fifteen years ago) link

ok, i was entertained by the dialogue that was just messing with people's heads, i admit. but i'm so baffled by how many people applaud the actual violence

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:34 (fifteen years ago) link

Didn't notice that the film was racist or xenophobic. But agree with Daria-G:

[the film is geared to get the audience off on the joker's evil deeds - it's part of the frisson, the sinful deliciousness of bad behavior that we are allowed to witness/condone/participate in as an audience. we can tut-tut and disapprove all of the bad behavior in the film but then you're missing a rather prominent layer of the film, which is entertainment via sadism... something ned touched on above with his (astute) comparison to funny games.]

Don't know what Funny Games is. Don't think I share your enthusiasm for evil deeds. The only way I can dig your 'ents via sadism' idea is that watching the Joker getting beaten up by Batman in the cell WAS enjoyable - I wish he'd kept going, smashed his head in against the wall a lot more. But the Joker is evil and did terrible things, so I'm not sorry that I liked seeing him hurt. I don't think that's the same as enjoying the pain he inflicts on the innocent.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:39 (fifteen years ago) link

it wasn't in general there were just moments that sort of made me step back and consider it

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:40 (fifteen years ago) link

you don't have to be entertained by the sadism, but that's what the film deals in. personally I find it difficult to disapprove of imaginary acts.

the racist/xenophobe thing - what in particular?

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:42 (fifteen years ago) link

The only way I can dig your 'ents via sadism' idea is that watching the Joker getting beaten up by Batman in the cell WAS enjoyable

something for everyone!

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link

i had trouble watching the interrogation w/joker where he gets beat up actually. couple interesting things going on though, gordon letting him go in there and beat the shit out of a suspect (because that's what he is, yes?), which is already wrong, then the result of batman barricading the door and going way too far, and getting information out of the guy through beating the shit out of him, but wait - it's bad information.

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link

i have to admit i felt rather sympathetic and attracted to the joker. I'm not sure if this is my fault or the film's (most likely Ledger's charisma)....I missed him when he wasn't on screen. honestly i wish the move was just heath ledger and gary oldman!

I thought it was actually a pretty disturbing moment when batman was beating the joker in the interrogation room....the political ramifications of enjoying THAT seemed ugly to me.

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:45 (fifteen years ago) link

i guess what's interesting about the joker to me (in a pretentious philosophical sense) is that he often exposes the limits of righteous justice through his implacable evil. ie, batman must transgress justice in order to preserve it. there is something appealing to me about that provocation.

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

but wait - it's bad information

exactly!

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:49 (fifteen years ago) link

i just in particular didn't like the scene with the prisoner, i felt like it was too obviously setting up expectations and playing off them to make everyone feel good, like the director didn't have the nerve to undermine that with all sorts of ambiguity like he did most everything else. i was also kind of like, eh, let's see what foreign gang of criminals is of-the-moment in this action film, that changes but the fact they're mostly foreign never does.

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:49 (fifteen years ago) link

ryan i like that

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link

carl schmitt: the movie

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Loved the movie, but honestly could have done with much less Rachel, Dent, and Batman. Like someone said above, Joker and Gordon made the movie for me, I got restless when they were not on the screen. I was surprised that they did not end with Dent turning into Two-Face so that he could appear in the third movie.

youcangoyourownway, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:58 (fifteen years ago) link

uh

max, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 17:59 (fifteen years ago) link

[personally I find it difficult to disapprove of imaginary acts.]

something about this statement doesn't sound right to me. all events within fiction are imaginary acts. so does that mean we don't bring any feelings of right and wrong, approval or disapproval, ethical norms and violations, to bear on anything in fiction? I think the last poor sod to profess that was sent to Reading Gaol in 1895 - I hope he wasn't treated like Batman treated the Joker.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I was surprised that they did not end with Dent turning into Two-Face so that he could appear in the third movie.

Well then.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:02 (fifteen years ago) link

saddest moment for me = ledger: "i think we'll be doing this forever." that just made me feel uggggggghhh. too sad.

ryan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:03 (fifteen years ago) link

sadder if he said it in I'm Not There?

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Okay how 'bout when he held a gun to his motherjumping head? I was mad squicked.

Abbott, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:09 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't really have any of those feelings about Ledger. Possible explanations:
1. the film was compelling so I wasn't thinking about actors much
2. Ledger was in make-up etc so didn't look like Heath Ledger
3. great performance --> he became character, I didn't think about HL
4. most important I think: I don't know much about HL, have hardly ever seen him in a film, so while anyone's passing is sad, his name / persona doesn't really mean much to me

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:12 (fifteen years ago) link

in fact yes I saw him as ... THE JOKER !!!

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Saw Hancock last night, which I think is actually better in contrast to The Dark Knight than it would have been on its own.

After seeing TDK, I wondered if there was any pressure from studio folks to make something more compact (90-minute movie for $120 mil instead of 2hr30 for $180, more screenings per day, etc.). Hancock runs about 90 minutes, goes light where TDK goes dark, and at the same time works hard to tell a fresh superhero story (alcoholic, troubled guy in that case). Jason Bateman, with perfect timing, makes it work.

Eazy, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:18 (fifteen years ago) link

[personally I find it difficult to disapprove of imaginary acts.]

something about this statement doesn't sound right to me. all events within fiction are imaginary acts. so does that mean we don't bring any feelings of right and wrong, approval or disapproval, ethical norms and violations, to bear on anything in fiction?

sure we bring them, but they might be at odds with the author's intent. rather than morally judge acts in fiction I'd rather think about why and how they're presented. if the author invites judgment, so be it. but I'm not sure that that's what nolan's up to when he turns blowing up a hospital into a slapstick bit.

put another way; you get turned off by a porno movie - does that mean it's not an erotic film?

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:23 (fifteen years ago) link

i didn't get any satisfaction from the interrogation scene, 'cause the joker was obviously getting a kick out of bats/the police losing their control and getting violent.

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:25 (fifteen years ago) link

but I'm not sure that that's what nolan's up to when he turns blowing up a hospital into a slapstick bit.

hello he's called THE JOKER

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:26 (fifteen years ago) link

x-post, which may or may not be compromised by what EIII has just written but I will post anyway, in haste:

The more I think about it, the more sure I am that Edward III is wrong in his [personally I find it difficult to disapprove of imaginary acts] position -- but the way he puts it makes it hard to deny or argue with.

But I think I have a suggestion. Insofar as fictional acts and events are hypothetical, with an 'as if' or 'what if' status, our moral judgement on them has the same status. It does sound foolish to disapprove of something that doesn't exist. But there is a modality in which fictional events do exist, a speculative / conjunctural one, and within that modality, that level of thinking if you like, our moral judgements about it exist just as much. We make moral judgements about fiction which are proportionate to fiction, which belong to the same universe as the fiction.

This is a vast and vexed question, but you only need imagine fictions about all kinds of terrible acts to see that you could not, would not, approach them with an amoral attitude in which the moral content of the actions was irrelevant to your response. For a fairly non-shocking example which also raises all the questions of beauty's relation to morality, aesthetics to ethics, we need only go back to Lolita.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:26 (fifteen years ago) link

I find it difficult to disapprove of imaginary acts

strangely enough, i thought it summed it up for me very nicely.

yeah, you can go to the movies and empathise with the characters, but an outpouring of grief for a hospital blowing up in a comic book film or i'm not entertained by sadism, had to look away (well, preferred to look away) during some of the really violent scenes, and kept getting stuck on little moments of "that's racist, that is so xenophobic." is surely taking it way too far?

the film exists to put a good guy and a bad guy into a climactic final showdown that looks good, is played stylishly and has a few killer lines- even with a director with ambitions as lofty as nolan may have can't lift it into the realms of humanitarian studies.

darraghmac, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Zing?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:19 (fifteen years ago) link

not sure? i just can't stand to watch a lot of onscreen violence because i prefer not to carry that around with me, like once you see something horrifying you can't un-see it

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:33 (fifteen years ago) link

like gigli

Edward III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 20:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I do have less tolerance for violence as I get older, yes.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

actually i wish i could have un-read a particular Joker story some kid in my elementary school class had a copy of, maybe it was in an anthology, I guess this was around the time the burton batman movie came out. not a comic book, just prose, but.. really terrifying, i remember it to this day.

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 22:29 (fifteen years ago) link

which one???

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 22:30 (fifteen years ago) link

hey my friend wrote a review

Well, I finally caught A Dark Night Turns starring deceased lothario, Keith Olbermann. Aside from his starring role as America's Funnyman, this film was an interminable mess. Still, his transcendent performance should get him some good looks from the luminaries who make these modern day parables come to the silver screen. I see a very bright future for this young man! Can't wait to see what the future holds for Olbermann.

cankles, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 22:38 (fifteen years ago) link

I enjoy the many acts of violence on screen as it makes me forget I want to slaughter half of this world

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 22:45 (fifteen years ago) link

jordan -> google tells me that apparently in 1989 they had a bunch of horror writers put together stories for a collection called 'further adventures of the joker'? i think it was in that. i suppose there was something that struck me about stephen king type of horror (which was v scary at age 10) + characters i was already familiar with. at least i didn't make it up!

daria-g, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:23 (fifteen years ago) link

i just can't stand to watch a lot of onscreen violence because i prefer not to carry that around with me, like once you see something horrifying you can't un-see it -- daria-g

I enjoy the many acts of violence on screen as it makes me forget I want to slaughter half of this world -- Bo Jackson Overdrive

I definitely see both side of this. Screen violence as an imaginary and harmless proxy for your own pent-up aggression is not a bad thing. But lord knows I have a large, varied, and disturbing cache of violent images from movies and TV stored up already, on file in my brain for immediate access anytime. So, I'm good, thanks.

So, to sum up, man smart, woman smarter. :)

kenan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:35 (fifteen years ago) link

lol, I in no way think my way is the right way necessarily, I am pretty much desensitized to all forms of screen violence and there's no doubt it's had an effect on me!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:39 (fifteen years ago) link

pussies, all of you. y'all deserve to have batman shove you around a little. builds character.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:42 (fifteen years ago) link

I had a nightmare of horrible bloodshed last night thx to watching Batmovie yesterday. But I do that after every creepy movie, a nightmare of some sort. It does have an effect, tho.

Abbott, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Bale should have replied to reporters:

"It's not who I am on the inside, its what I do that defines me"

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:47 (fifteen years ago) link

i've had dreams where I've murdered people before but not usually after movies, usually when I'm depressed.

oddly enough I didn't have any Batman themed dreams after seeing it either time...maybe the third time's a charm!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Violence has a way of going right to the ol' lizard brain, and that's not always a bad thing. There's some screen violence I wouldn't do without. Life would be just a tiny bit sadder if I'd never seen, for instance, William Munny down a bottle of whiskey and blow away seven dudes. But that visceral thrill is too easy to overuse, and a lot of films and directors (coughSCORSESEcough) use it for its own sake, often occluding the filmmaker's own intended effect. It seems a shame when a movie has a point view and a moral and a purpose, and years later you think back on it and only remember that one really gruesome scene.

kenan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:55 (fifteen years ago) link

probably depends on background too. someone like me who grew up in suburbia and didn't see a lot of this growing up may have it hit less close to home than someone who grew up around violence.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Surely two very different issues?

kenan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 23:58 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe. batman rox.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 00:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, I'm not really including Batman kicking ass. Go ahead, punch away, and have a big wet thwack sound to go with it, that's cool. I'm thinking more like the stitching-up scene in Pan's Labyrinth. OMG so disgusting, so fetishistic. Like daria said, you can't un-see shit like that.

kenan, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 00:10 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm not a big horror movie buff, if'n you can't tell.

kenan, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 00:11 (fifteen years ago) link

It seems a shame when a movie has a point view and a moral and a purpose, and years later you think back on it and only remember that one really gruesome scene.

an excellent point. it's like that saying: you can be shooting a love scene but the moment there is nudity you are making a documentary.

ryan, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 00:15 (fifteen years ago) link

not if there's a lot of fancy lighting and shadow

latebloomer, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 00:26 (fifteen years ago) link

to be serious though, i love fantasy/horror violence.

if i'm ever bothered by violence in films it's usually realistic beatings or potrayals of domestic abuse that get me.

latebloomer, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 00:35 (fifteen years ago) link

otm, that's why it's hard for me to forgive Scorsese for all the "surprise you're dead" stuff in The Departed (like someone mentioned upthread), because he also made Raging Bull and Taxi Driver, so I know he knows the difference.

kenan, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 00:38 (fifteen years ago) link

bah i've been thinking and writing about this fkn movie why because it intersting. this is deep into ain't it cool/livejournal territory, but thx for you patience...

Taking back what I said before, I think there was some subtext, but it’s buried beneath both the violent flashiness and “rhetorical” flashiness – the love triangle plot has more to do with what’s going on than anything, but it was given less weight in the edit room it seems. What was Cilian Murphy even doing in this movie? The movie is cut around the Joker, it’s true.

The foreground is that Bruce Wayne is sick of the Batman act, because of what it cost him (Rachel), plus it’s physically punishing, and it has somewhat backfired. The city is no safer: since he owns the night, crime has moved into broad daylight, and other amateur vigiliantes are out there hurting people and getting hurt. He wanted inspiration, not imitation. He was hoping it wouldn’t take that long for Gotham to reach a tipping point of security, if everyone would just believe!, but it hasn’t happened. He’s on a treadmill.

Enter Harvey, who can solidify Batman’s gains legitimately, and, in doing so, allow him to quit being both Batman and “Bruce Wayne” the fuckup playboy (Bale is really great as this third version of himself, immediately slurring his lines, clueless). Wayne pushes Harvey too hard and too fast, but Harvey is more than willing to go just as far. A true believer, this Harvey, with more than a touch of self-delusion about him, and willing to “go vigilante” himself (the detainee torture comment comes here – but of course his game of chance with other people’s lives is rigged, until he becomes Two-Face).

The writers give Rachel a hint of a complaint that Wayne-as-Batman may get Harvey killed, and not just to save the city (as Harvey believes) but to win her away. It’s no wonder Wayne saves Dent, he’s been careless and duplicitous with him most of all. Besides, we have to believe that if he saved Rachel and let Dent die, she would never have him anyway.

The movie is concerned with how people communicate about themselves, what they try to get others to believe, both individually, and as a mass. It would have been better, I guess, if the movie had less about boatfuls of people blowing each other up (or not) and more about how all these characters have to tend to their own fictions in order to function. The Joker lying as a matter of routine, unexplained, about his “origin” was a great touch – he doesn’t really lie about anything else. But as an Iago figure, he wasn’t given enough of the talent to see through people’s bullshit. I though maybe it would be obvious to him, at some point, who Batman was.

The Joker keeps taunting Batman that they are the same kind, a pair of freaks, but everyone knows this is not true, it’s kind of an ineffective taunt. Unfortunately, Rachel agrees with the Joker on this point: what Bruce has done to his life is bonkers; the fact that he’s really good at it only counts against him. She has chosen to give herself finally to Harvey, a fact that Alfred keeps concealed, knowing that Wayne’s self-conception has to be carefully managed as well. Wayne chooses Dent and the City over love, which Dent never fully understands. This also proves Rachel right, in a way: it is crazy, but also worthy. Everyone has to be lied to, about something. (This gets garbled and lost, in the conclusion, I think. All the stuff about “responsibility” was weak).

Both Rachel and Harvey (ultimately) die, and Bruce lives on, without knowing the full story they were a part of, maybe this is what seems sadistic about the movie. That, or all the cops shot in the face. The Batman-Dent plan to save Gotham instantly shifts to a Batman-Gordon PR offensive about Dent, post-mortem. This is cynical stuff; do they have that little faith in Gothamites to live with the truth? Is a white knight that important? Do they judge “the soul of Gotham” – the key to all the politics of the film – completely wrong? Maybe this is why Armond White called the movie’s “ideology” disgusting.

goole, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 01:09 (fifteen years ago) link

(i realize there's some controversy over who Batman intended to save...)

goole, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 01:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman wanted to ride Dent hard

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 01:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh my gosh goole you have made this movie sound like an episode of House M.D.! Very nice.

Abbott, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 02:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Wayne chooses Dent and the City over love

Are you talking specifically about who Batman decided to rescue? Because I thought that Batman had every intention of going to Rachel, and the Joker swapped the addresses so that whichever one Batman wanted to get to would be the one he left behind.

musically, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 02:53 (fifteen years ago) link

okay nm xpost didn't see your followup.

I will be seeing the movie again this weekend so I will try to pay close attention during the scene. However from what I remember didn't Batman clearly yell "RACHEL" to Gordon?

musically, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 02:56 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah you're probably right, lol oh well!

goole, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 03:00 (fifteen years ago) link

another funny thing - bruce wayne gives an actually serious speech about how dent is the one who can fix gotham, and immediately rachel is like "i know you, you're making fun of him"

WTF did the joker say to dent in the hospital anyway? I can't remember.

daria-g, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 05:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Goole: very interesting; re. your insightful Joker, I think he *does* suggest that he knows that Batman is BW, while Bats is beating up on him in the cell - which makes Bats angrier and beat up on him more.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 11:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Aaron Eckhart thinks that the film asks pertinent political questions:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/jul/23/dark.knight

the pinefox, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 11:59 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think Joker necessarily knew he was Bruce Wayne...he was referring to the fact that he thought maybe Batman tore after Dawes when he threw her out the window, but that doesn't necessarily mean he knew it was Wayne as opposed to just knowing it wasn't Dent.

Maybe, maybe not!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 12:25 (fifteen years ago) link

All the Joker knows at that point is that Batman has the hots for Rachel, which is enough for him to set up the "choose one to die" trap.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 12:30 (fifteen years ago) link

All the Joker knows at that point is that Batman has the hots for Rachel, which is enough for him to set up the "choose one to die" trap.

Exactly.

Someone should start a "let me explain movie narratives to you" thread.

Batman jumped out a window to save Rachel. Joker noticed this.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 13:39 (fifteen years ago) link

WTF did the joker say to dent in the hospital anyway? I can't remember.

"Sorry about all this; it wasn't personal. Hell, it wasn't even MY plan! I don't plan anything, I just let stuff happen. If you want to take someone out, go after the people who let me off the leash and let all of this happen..." etc etc boom goes hospital

HI DERE, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 13:52 (fifteen years ago) link

It really IS odd how little Cilian Murphy is in this picture, considering that N. was talking about his contribution in summer 2006, for crying out loud.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 15:08 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought that the dude in the cop uniform that dent was beating up for information was cilian at first, and i was confused.

Jordan, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 15:35 (fifteen years ago) link

i've got quibbles with it, but i did like monsieur k-punk's riffing on the first nolan batman:

http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/005757.html

i think it probably influenced what i was looking for in the second one.

goole, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Does anyone know if/why Katie Holmes wasn't in this one, and Maggie was? I found myself wondering if the "You complete me" line in the movie pissed off Tom, who then made Katie bow out? Or maybe not. Maybe they even threw that in to bug them because she wouldn't play.. *shrug* Just found it a funny coincidence.

Finefinemusic, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link

iirc the production of the dark knight started right around the time of the Great Tom Cruise Sc1ent0l0gy Freakout and Whirlwind Romance Roadshow and they said no thanks. plus she was bad!

goole, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 17:04 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.saasta.fi/saasta/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/0007ey4t1.jpeg

Tuomas, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Short version =

Brilliant.

Although not without fault.

Basically a remake of Heat with the family drama sucked out and some mental health hijinks / explosions / costumed psychos thrown in.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 07:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Long version (HERE BE SPOILERS) =

I'd read spoilers. Initially by accident but then curiosity got the better of me and I read a full-on synopsis (I wanted to know how they got to Hong Kong, basically). I'd read spoilers and a detailed synopsis and it still made me flinch and gulp and put my hands in front of my eyes. And it did that with less than 200ml of fake blood, one shot of exposed flesh (Bruce's bruised back, briefly) and exactly no profanity. Em had not read any spoilers or synopses, but did suspect that Rachel was going to die (because I asked her if she wanted to know who dies, and she took my question as meaning Maggie's character, because she loves Maggie), and Em cried several times during the film. The audience, and the cinema was packed for this preview screening, was respectively silent except when it gasped or laughed. And it did laugh quite a lot. maybe this is a British thing, but I thought the film was funny, in just the right places. Best example; Joker's just psyched-out Dent in Gotham General and is sashaying down the corridor in the nurse's uniform, about to blow the place the fuck up. And he stops to wash his hands with one of those freaky dissolving handwash anti-MRSA things. I laughed really loudly at this, and I laughed first, just proper incredulity farts coming out of my mouth, and pretty much everyone else then laughed too. Because it was OK. Blowing up a hospital is an awful thing to do, but it's OK; Joker's not gonna spread any bacterial infections. Inversion of that; I knew the pencil thing was coming, and flinched; most other people laughed, in a shocked way. I wish I'd been able to be taken by surprise by it, I guess, but at the same time, I'm glad I wasn't so ambushed by it's swift, grotesque brutality that I laughed at a man's brain being destroyed by wood and graphite.

Ledger was awesome, this is a truism bordering on cliche at this stage. Best moment; the silent, slow-motion shot of him leaning out of the speeding cop car window as he escapes, which I took as a tribute to Ledger: both moving in the context of a tribute to a fine actor who died pathetically young, and also a revealing shot of the Joker's mental state. He's fucked-up. I don't know why, but he's so fucked-up, so monumentally fucked-up that he wants to die. Every single person that he kills is actually a misdirected suicide attempt. He hates himself and wants escape but due to... whatever trauma that caused those scars, and whatever else he's been through, thinks he can't die. He's got endurance that he wishes he didn't have. So he kills other people cos he thinks he can't die himself but he sure fucking wants to. But in the split second, leaning out of the car, he's free, and the psychosis drops away. At one stage he tells Dent "I'm a dog chasing a car; I wouldn't know what to do with it if I caught it"; at the moment he was a dog in a car, enjoying the ride. Note how many dogs are in the film. Lots of dogs. They're a plot device for something? We all know that you don't (really) get 'bad' dogs; just dogs with shitty owners. The Joker is a dog.

Two bits that jarred; massive black scar-tattooed criminal doing the morally good thing (oooh oooh inverted expectations [maybe, just maybe, he was a thief, not a murderer?]) handled possibly clumsily. Gordon's final speech was about two lines too long.

Pacing was fine; pacing was superb; I didn't even contemplate looking at my watch once. It felt very short. I'd have guessed at 100 minutes, not 150. Heat, which I love, and which this movie clearly pays homage to at several points - the truck smash on the underpass, the opening robbery (the bank manager is the bond dude from Heat!), the Batman / Joker 'exchange' (except Pacino never brutalised De Niro) - Heat seems too long at points. But it also establishes characters and motivations better. Or does it? "I have a woman" vs lies about a disfigured wife? Are they lies?

Such a shame Rachel died if ONLY because Maggie did more in ten minutes of screen time with the character than Katie could do over a TV mini-series. Gutsy; gleeful; conflicted in love; tense; moral but not moralising.

Gordon was great. Em cried when he died. She cried again when they told his family. I forgot for most of the Dent-armoured-van-catch-Batman chase that Gordon was driving; I assumed it must be a henchman. So pleasantly surprised that it was Gordon.

The ending... very 24. A lot of it was very 24.

The infinite-sonar thing does two things; one it shows the iconography of Batman with white eyes like in most comics, which no other film or TV has done (bar animated, which can, of course); two it shows that Batman's a(n accidental) fascist. Ends justify the means. VERY Frank Miller.

Alfred and Lucius both good; weighty relief. "Let me get this straight; you're saying that your client, who is one of the richest and most powerful men in the world, spends his evenings brutalising criminals with his bare fists, and you are intending to blackmail him...?" LOL. Nolan brings the funny, again and again. Often through shock but also through dramatic irony.

Gadgets and explosions; flipping a truck over with a bit of wire is fucking WAY COOL. Flipping your Bat-Pod round on a wall is fucking WAY COOL. All the base-jumping+gliding+through+windows_ninja-ing people is fucking WAY COOL. Joker's make-up is fucking WAY COOL, the only non-hammy take on it so far. Opening heist is fucking WAY COOL, especially the escape. Yes it's ridiculous but this is a film and it is meant to be ridiculous. Which school bus is the one with the criminal one? Is it the one covered in mortar dust and detritus and with no kids aboard?! The whole film was way fucking cool. I loved it. I'll be seeing it again pretty soon.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 07:24 (fifteen years ago) link

RespectFULLY not respectively.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 07:25 (fifteen years ago) link

basically a remake of heat if heat was a movie that guzzled balls and was really ugly and boring

xtian bale sux at acting, needed to be a lot shorter and also have more eric roberts and batmanuel, fichtner cameo was pimp

jackie the jokeman martling's stunning performance as the joker was of course mesmerizing~

Two bits that jarred; massive black scar-tattooed criminal doing the morally good thing (oooh oooh inverted expectations [maybe, just maybe, he was a thief, not a murderer?]) handled possibly clumsily.

that part was awesome cuz it was ZEUS aka the dude from friday

cankles, Thursday, 24 July 2008 08:01 (fifteen years ago) link

as much as I liked TKD (and loved certain scenes) it was almost torpedoed by the music. After nearly two full hours of that intense, two-chord main theme, all the tension and dread turned into fatigue and exhaustion. Music = sledgehammer, basically. Right around the hospital sequence I just started to get a little numb to the whole thing. Some inspired and sporadic brilliance in the final 30 minutes, but such a shame really.

loved the Joker (especially his voice). it's interesting that most memorably terrifying villains of late represent drama (TKD, No Country), not horror genre. prolly because most horror directors are too stupid to realized the more backstory they give their monsters the less interesting the monsters become. also, both these films had way too much speechifying at the end.

Cosmo Vitelli, Thursday, 24 July 2008 09:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Can't say the music bothered me at all; I liked it, and thought it worked well. But that's just down to taste and aesthetics, I guess.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 09:36 (fifteen years ago) link

I also don't think the film was anywhere near as brutal and sadistic as people made it out to be; yes moments were horrific and made me flinch, but... there was no blood, no gratuitous horror amputations, etc, no gore. Except Harvey's face - and even that... it didn't bleed. It was like a Jim Lee illustration - anatomically fascinating but very very obviously unreal. Compared to Heat, when the driver guy is found in his apartment and he's... glued to the floor with his own blood and pus after taking the beating to end all beating... that's gruesome. The pearling spunks of blood parabola-ing out of the guy's neck in Cache by Haneke are gruesome. The crushed bird and menstrual blood and anal-rape-with-a-pitchfork in Anatomy of Hell are gruesome. This film is nothing compared to Monica Belluci's face being literally kicked off, after she's been anally-raped half to death, in Irreversible.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 09:41 (fifteen years ago) link

fichtner cameo

Ooh!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 24 July 2008 09:44 (fifteen years ago) link

If anyone wants a 3D lenticular poster with Batman, Joker, and Harvey dent on it, I have one for sale on ebay.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 11:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh, sold.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Too dark. 6/10

Alba, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Will try it again next week on IMAX.

Alba, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Dark in what way? Visual or metaphorical? It made me laugh.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Just no fun and thrills. Felt too deliberately restrained for too long. I didn't feel the import of whatever was in fun's place (which I did with Batman Begins). But I think it might be my odd state of mind this morning. I think I'm low on blood sugar or blood pressure or something. I couldn't even follow what was happening towards the end.

I think it might be like There Will Be Blood, where I really have to see it twice.

Alba, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Interesting; I found it really fun and with lots of thrills. Will be interested to hear what you think if you watch again.

I was talking to Em over lunch and we both agreed that the atmosphere of seeing it last night, at a preview screening with a handful of people wearing Batman t-shirts (and one guy in full Ledger-as-Joker make-up!) was really special; the audience was really hushed and reverent, and it felt like a real shared cultural experience, the like of which I've not experienced at the cinema since the LOTR films.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:23 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh, it was superfun when the Joker did that thing with the pencil near the beginning. I can't deny that.

Alba, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:27 (fifteen years ago) link

And yeah, the audience at the 10am show this morning was amazingly quiet and attentive. Complete contrast to Wall-E last night, which I had to leave because of the bloody racket.

Alba, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:28 (fifteen years ago) link

It really IS odd how little Cilian Murphy is in this picture, considering that N. was talking about his contribution in summer 2006, for crying out loud.

-- the pinefox, Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:08 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

Actually, given the time and events between then and now, it';s not odd at all - Ledger dying probably changed how they went about editing the film quite a bit, which may well have resulted in scenes with Murphy ending up on the cutting room floor - he can, after all, come back for a third film.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:41 (fifteen years ago) link

ladies and gentlemen when i say i'm a batman, u will agree~

oh and dude still cant direct a fight scene, but maybe that's a symptom of the batsuit bein so clunky and bulky lookin like he's in one of those olde tymey armored diving suits (except less cool)

cankles, Thursday, 24 July 2008 12:42 (fifteen years ago) link

i haven't been completely following this thread but can someone tell me what they mean when they say Nolan can't shoot an action sequence?

He tends to shoot a tad too close, I'll give you that but I thoroughly enjoyed all the action sequences in this. Hong Kong sequence? Yes. Helicopter crashing into building? Yes. Truck overturning? WHOA.

And the fact that they shot this with minimal CGI (except for Dent's face)... It's just so rare now to see that quality in movies this size. I dunno, I guess I like that objects look and feel heavy in this. That's my big issue with the Spidey movies - everything moves really fast but looks so flat and depth-less. Works well in cinema but on TV, the thrilling bits seem oddly muted.

Roz, Thursday, 24 July 2008 13:54 (fifteen years ago) link

They mean "I don't like the way Nolan directs/shoots action sequences/fight scenes".

HI DERE, Thursday, 24 July 2008 13:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, I love Nolan's action sequences, thoroughly enjoyed every one of them. In the first film I grant you they were super dark and fast and confusing but no one knew who Batman was then (in terms of the characters / goons he was pasting) and hence it was all about their confusion and terror at this nameless, shapeless thing ninja-ing fuck out of them from the shadows. The fight in his Penthouse in this seemed fine; excellent - it's like it was the POV of a guest there, confused and turning around and not quite seeing exactly who is hitting who clearly but being aware that yes, there's Batman, and yes, there's some goons, and Batman is battering the goons.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 24 July 2008 13:59 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah exactly. and I honestly think it was the only way to shoot that - if the camera had pulled any further back, it'll be all lol @ guy in batsuit in the middle of posh party.

in other words this i guess >> oh and dude still cant direct a fight scene, but maybe that's a symptom of the batsuit bein so clunky and bulky lookin

Roz, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:14 (fifteen years ago) link

bale's head looked like it was getting squeeezed

when i first saw deebo on the boat, i was like: is that BANE? but he's not anyone, just a prisoner, right?

hytop, Thursday, 24 July 2008 14:28 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought this was totally great! one problem though: the final action scene where batman was trying to get to the joker and had to deal with hostages dressed as joker minions and joker minions dressed as doctors or something while batman is trying to find them all via that cell phone sonar? pretty incoherent. so i guess it wasn't "totally" great, but close to it.

omar little, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:24 (fifteen years ago) link

couldn't batman have used his batphone or something to radio the swat guys about the switcheroo with the joker costumes?

carne asada, Thursday, 24 July 2008 21:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Does anyone know if/why Katie Holmes wasn't in this one, and Maggie was? I found myself wondering if the "You complete me" line in the movie pissed off Tom, who then made Katie bow out? Or maybe not. Maybe they even threw that in to bug them because she wouldn't play.. *shrug* Just found it a funny coincidence.

-- Finefinemusic, Wednesday, July 23, 2008 5:02 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Link

http://www.newsweek.com/id/145508/page/2

Everyone from the first movie is back except Katie Holmes. Maggie Gyllenhaal has taken over her role as Bruce's love interest. Isn't it disruptive to have a new actor playing an old character, with no explanation?
Well, it's not ideal. But this character is an integral part of the story. So when Katie didn't want to do it, I had no choice.

Prior to the opening of "Batman Begins," there were many published reports about dismay at Warner Brothers over the way Katie's personal life—specifically her romance with Tom Cruise—became an unwelcome distraction. Did that have anything to do with her not returning?
No, I asked Katie if she wanted to do the part, and she passed. You'd have to ask her for the exact specifics of it, but I would have been perfectly happy to have her back. And indeed, I offered her the part. But she couldn't do it, and Maggie stepped in, and she was great.

latebloomer, Friday, 25 July 2008 05:10 (fifteen years ago) link

http://my.spill.com/profiles/blog/show?id=947994%3ABlogPost%3A355506

michael bay's batman

cankles, Friday, 25 July 2008 05:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Potential spoiler alert...

Is Harvey Dent / Two-Face actually dead? I've just been talking with my friend Ben, who saw it last night, about what they might do if a third film was made re; villain, as obviously Heath is out of the game and given circumstances it's unlikely that they'd recast anyone else in the role of The Joker. And Ben pointed out that neither Batman nor Gordon actually check Dent for a pulse or anything; he's just laying there still and the assumption is that he's dead...

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Finally saw this last night. A week after premiere and the line to see the 10:30 PM showing was still half-way around the NYC block.

Considering this (better than Batman Begins), Hellboy 2 (better than Hellboy), X-Men 2 ("), and Spiderman 2 ("), is there an argument to be made for skipping the Year Zero story in the movie and skipping right to the meat? It seems like the problems everyone has had with the originals that the sequels circumvent is that they spend too much time with origin stories.

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:40 (fifteen years ago) link

XP

I don't think Harvey Dent OR Rachel are dead. If they don't show the body (and they didn't show Rachel's) than the character isn't dead. And with Harvey, it seems much more likely that they shut him in Arkham Asylum and told everyone he was dead to save face.

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:41 (fifteen years ago) link

he's dead, she's dead.

latebloomer, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:41 (fifteen years ago) link

you really think they'll bring them back in the next one?

i can see a case being made for two-face but there'd be no reason to to bring rachel back.

latebloomer, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:43 (fifteen years ago) link

latebloomer, I take it you've never read a comic book before? They ALWAYS come back.

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Hahaha, yeah, people always come back in comics, it's true. Good point and so obvious I can't believe it hadn't occurred before.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:45 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah but this an adaptation of a comic book, not an actual comic book.

latebloomer, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:48 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean, they certainly could find a way to bring two-face back for a third movie, i just highly doubt they'll actually have a reason to do that.

latebloomer, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:50 (fifteen years ago) link

dent's arc is over at the end of the movie.

latebloomer, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it's pretty telling that neither Rachel's death nor Two-Face's death in the flick are definitive. We never see Rachel "blow up" (we see her, then we see a cut to the building exploding, but we never see her in that particular building exploding) or her body, and we never see an indication that Two-Face is definitely dead. Maybe it's too much comic book reading, but unless it's ironclad, I always assume the character can still come back. (And even ironclad -- like with Ra's al Ghul in Batman Begins -- I figure they can still bring him back.)

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, but is Two-Face's?

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:51 (fifteen years ago) link

xxp And yeah, I'm not saying that it would necessarily be a good idea cinematically to bring either character back. Just that it's very doable, and I wouldn't be surprised in the least.

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:51 (fifteen years ago) link

xx-post.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, if you're looking for the film itself to be conscious of that possibility -- they killed off a character in TDK and then brought him back. So certainly "trick deaths" aren't outside the realm of Nolan's Batman universe.

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:52 (fifteen years ago) link

My main reason for feeling this just... if they make a third, and surely after the financial success of this they have to, who do you use as a villain?

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:53 (fifteen years ago) link

the big problem with bringing Two-Face back is that it would completely devalue the conclusion of TDK.

they could bring back Scarecrow, maybe. But he was kind of an afterthought in this one already.

xp lols.

Roz, Friday, 25 July 2008 09:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Who was Scarecrow in this one? I noticed some guy in the opening sequence wearing the scarecrow mask, but I assumed that was just an homage. Was he actually in the flick?

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 10:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes he was; they unmasked him at the end of the sequence and it was Murphy as per first film.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 10:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Weird.

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 10:05 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think they're coming back. The two deaths are pretty important for the advancement of Batman's character and however they're setting up his story for the inevitable third installment. (crossing fingers for no Robin)

The reason they don't show people die up close in this one was for the PG-13 rating - hence always the cutting away right before anyone gets shot, sliced, blown up - the movie's bloodless.

What's really sad is that they obviously set it up for Joker to come back in a third one, which of course will not happen for this franchise.

skipping the Year Zero story in the movie and skipping right to the meat?
Not a bad idea, but well, it didn't really help Superman Returns. Also, the first half of Spider-Man 1 was great! I really liked Hellboy 1 too, it just could've done without Generic Introduction Guy who was tossed aside in one line in the sequel. And even though X-Men 1 wasn't that good, I don't know if X2 could've been as good if all the chaff wasn't already done with - that movie had lots of great little character moments that wouldn't have flown if they'd skipped #1.

Also, sometimes I think it really is necessary - Batman Begins needed to distance itself from the Burton/Schumacher movies, and Iron Man actually did it right - shockingly right for a character that already has weird, often illogical origins.

Nhex, Friday, 25 July 2008 10:06 (fifteen years ago) link

re: the "is Two-Face dead?" question:

http://movies.ign.com/articles/892/892656p1.html?RSSwhen2008-07-22_171800&RSSid=892656

Why not just recast the Joker and bring back Two-Face, you ask? With Heath Ledger dead and his portrayal of the Joker now indelibly etched into filmgoers' minds, we think it highly unlikely that the filmmakers would recast the role to bring the Clown Prince back. It would also be tough for that character to top what he did to Batman and Gotham in TDK so perhaps once is enough. Likewise, the ending of TDK seemed to suggest that Harvey Dent/Two-Face was dead, although producer Emma Thomas told IGN after an early press screening that Dent's last scene was ambiguous enough to suggest that perhaps he was still alive.

I guess they're keeping their options open.

latebloomer, Friday, 25 July 2008 10:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Nothing wrong with IGN's reporting on the ambiguity of the film's ending, but did you happen to catch their first two features on Batman's villains? Worst writing ever.

Mordy, Friday, 25 July 2008 11:14 (fifteen years ago) link

that's more or less to be expected of IGN

latebloomer, Friday, 25 July 2008 11:29 (fifteen years ago) link

If Batman has copycats, why shouldn't Joker have copycats? Recast and say so.

Oilyrags, Friday, 25 July 2008 12:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Anyway, Freeman has a line that clearly references Catwoman.

Oilyrags, Friday, 25 July 2008 12:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Suitability for 11yo who liked the first one?

aldo, Friday, 25 July 2008 12:57 (fifteen years ago) link

does your mother know you post on ilx?

DG, Friday, 25 July 2008 12:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes, each time you fuck her she gives you a biscuit.

aldo, Friday, 25 July 2008 13:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Wait, that's not right.

aldo, Friday, 25 July 2008 13:11 (fifteen years ago) link

You don't actually see any blood or the physical impact of any punches or the like (though you do hear it), there's no profanity, and no sexual content (unless you count a brief snog), BUT it is brutal and violent and emotionally traumatic. So... your call. If the 11 year old liked the first one and can properly walk out of the cinema and know it was only a film (something the film is VERY aware of) then it's probably fine.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 13:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Thanks Nick, he does the disassociation between film/tv/books and real life pretty well so I might see what he thinks - let's face it, he might not be bothered.

aldo, Friday, 25 July 2008 13:16 (fifteen years ago) link

This movie would have given me nightmares when I was 11. I also would have loved it.

If the 3rd movie doesn't have Catwoman in it I wll be very very very surprised (first movie sets up a relationship, second movie kills it off, third movie = REBOUND).

HI DERE, Friday, 25 July 2008 13:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Speaking of the film knowing it's a film...

I think the CGI for Dent's face, the lack of blood, the clever cutting to prevent the audience seeing the impact of punches, etc, makes the film one of the best translations of the comicbook medium to film; it's VERY aware of its unreality, even though it portrays an allegedly grim version of reality - this is very much NOT real life that's being shown, it IS comicbook action and adventure, even if there's a bigger dose of moral fracture and emotional trauma than you'd get with Fantastic Four. Trucks getting flipped over, base-jumping ninjas flying through windows, blown-up tanks that fire-out their front wheels which become a bad motorbike. I don't think there's any pretension towards realism in the way that there might be in Haneke (I mention him because of Ned's allusion in his blog); the violence and action in The Dark Knight has no desire to be seen as real. It's total knowing spectacle.

Third movie may well feature Catwoman, but LORDY the character needs some serious redemption after Halle.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 13:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Up above, goole says "[The Joker] doesn't really lie about anything else [apart from the origins of his scars]" but I think he does; I think he deliberately spends most of the movie lying - he lies at the outset to the goons in the bank heist, he lies to Dent when he's psyching him out in the hospital, tipping him over the edge - he says he's not a plotter, says he doesn't plan anything, which some people have seen as bad screenplaying coming out as contradictions / hypocrisy given his planting of bombs everywhere and his obviously meticulously arranged escape, but it's not bad screenplaying - it's The Joker being a liar, seeing Dent's obsession with chance and justice and fairness and effectively saying "I didn't plan it; it just happened by accident" to send him mental, when it was ALL a plan. If I were really pushing, I'd say the only honest line The Joker utters in the whole film is when Batman's charging towards him on the Batpod, and he says "Come on, do it, do it, do it", because, as I've said before, I think The Joker does really want to die. He hates being alive. He can't stand it, he hates what he is and what he does but he can't end it himself so he wants someone else to end it. And when he realises Batman can't do it either, he assumes no one ever can, so they'll "keep doing this forever".

Re; dent's death - had Dent died, Batman would have had to acknowledge that he killed him and that yes, ultimately The Joker did make him break his only rule.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 25 July 2008 13:34 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that's pretty OTM with the caveat that I do think the Joker made Batman break his only rule; the Joker pretty much wins every conflict in this movie, even though he does get captured at the end.

HI DERE, Friday, 25 July 2008 13:39 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/37627

Brave and Bold Animated series

Oilyrags, Friday, 25 July 2008 15:10 (fifteen years ago) link

My main reason for feeling this just... if they make a third, and surely after the financial success of this they have to, who do you use as a villain?

let's not lie to each other, it's probably going to be KGBeast.

Jordan, Friday, 25 July 2008 15:28 (fifteen years ago) link

or NKVDemon

Jordan, Friday, 25 July 2008 15:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Kids these days have never heard of the KGB, much less the NKVD.

They'll have to update it to the Al-Quedassassin or something.

Oilyrags, Friday, 25 July 2008 15:39 (fifteen years ago) link

They'll call him Al-Qaedaemon or better, Baal- Qaeda.

EZ Snappin, Friday, 25 July 2008 15:46 (fifteen years ago) link

so much good stuff here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_villains

Jordan, Friday, 25 July 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Calendar Man Detective Comics #259 (September 1958) Julian Day, also known as the Calendar Man, is known for committing crimes that corresponded with significant dates.

Film Freak Batman #395 (May 1986) Burt Weston is a wannabe actor who dreams of getting a big break by playing quirky villains. When each of his plans fails, he fakes his death similar to the movie The Sting. He is later killed by Bane.

Penny Plunderer World's Finest Comics #30 (September/October 1947) Joe Coyne, a thief obsessed with penny-oriented crimes, starts his career selling newspapers for pennies. He is later caught stealing pennies.

Jordan, Friday, 25 July 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

More why so seriously, I mentioned elsewhere the idea of an emphasis on 'bestial' villains - something is causing wierdos like Killer Croc, Man-Bat, and The Penguin to appear. Hugo Strange, maybe. This would be a pretty drastic change in tone from the "Batman: Life on the Streets" vibe of TDK, though.

Oilyrags, Friday, 25 July 2008 15:54 (fifteen years ago) link

RED HOOD

HI DERE, Friday, 25 July 2008 16:43 (fifteen years ago) link

ventriloquist!!!!!1

cankles, Friday, 25 July 2008 16:50 (fifteen years ago) link

red hood for the fourth movie, after they do robin?

Jordan, Friday, 25 July 2008 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I want the way they 'do' Robin in this cycle of films to be the equivalent of how The Incredibles handled Syndrome.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 July 2008 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't like the Red Hood as Robin stuff. I like him pretty well as the Joker's origin story. Too late to worry about that for Ledgoker, but maybe the copycat idea I mentioned upthread could run with it.

Oilyrags, Friday, 25 July 2008 16:59 (fifteen years ago) link

To keep the policier tone and adapt a villain from the comics, perhaps a reworked so he's not so damn silly version of "The Wrath"?

Oilyrags, Friday, 25 July 2008 17:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Ten-Eyed Man Batman #226 (November 1970) Philip Reardon is a former Vietnam War veteran/warehouse guard who is blinded in a warehouse explosion that burns his retinas. Doctor Engstrom reconnects them to his fingers. Reardon blames Batman for his blindness. He is killed during the Crisis on Infinite Earths.

this guy will be the villain when guillermo del toro takes over batman.

Jordan, Friday, 25 July 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

and then there's this:

There seems to me no question that the Batman film "The Dark Knight," currently breaking every box office record in history, is at some level a paean of praise to the fortitude and moral courage that has been shown by George W. Bush in this time of terror and war.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 25 July 2008 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Why is it then that left-wingers feel free to make their films direct and realistic, whereas Hollywood conservatives have to put on a mask in order to speak what they know to be the truth? Why is it, indeed, that the conservative values that power our defense -- values like morality, faith, self-sacrifice and the nobility of fighting for the right -- only appear in fantasy or comic-inspired films like "300," "Lord of the Rings," "Narnia," "Spiderman 3" and now "The Dark Knight"?

tipsy mothra, Friday, 25 July 2008 17:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Mr. Klavan has won two Edgar Awards from the Mystery Writers of America. His new novel, "Empire of Lies" (An Otto Penzler Book, Harcourt), is about an ordinary man confronting the war on terror.

Very, very ordinary.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 July 2008 17:46 (fifteen years ago) link

I saw that article, read the first paragraph and basically went "lol dumbass".

HI DERE, Friday, 25 July 2008 17:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, Patrick Goldstein, Joe Morgenstern and the masses. Among other things:

Readers questioned Morgenstern's manhood ("What an old queen!"), taunted him ("Prepare to be roasted!!!") and hooted at his bad taste (" 'Mamma Mia' over 'TDK'? Seriously? Wow, what a tool"). But when a guy whose e-mail handle is Super Nazi Moses blows you off, saying, "You are a moron ... Burn in Hell," you really have to consider the source. After all, what you would expect Super Nazi Moses to say?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 25 July 2008 19:44 (fifteen years ago) link

WWSNMD?

BLACK BEYONCE, Friday, 25 July 2008 19:49 (fifteen years ago) link

> what you would expect Super Nazi Moses to say?

Achtung, let my people go up up and away!

Oilyrags, Friday, 25 July 2008 19:50 (fifteen years ago) link

When I mentioned the movie doing what it could to get around the PG-13 rating, I didn't mean to sound too critical - I still found the movie quite effective and disturbing despite the lack of blood. I was just arguing that the the characters are definitely dead, despite the cutaways.

I thought the ending meant that Batman essentially DID take the rap for all the people Dent killed, as well as Dent being killed himself. If they really do bring back any of the dead characters it would really ruin the story retroactively.

this guy will be the villain when guillermo del toro takes over batman.
hahaha.

Nhex, Friday, 25 July 2008 20:40 (fifteen years ago) link

lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2yv8aT0UFc

latebloomer, Saturday, 26 July 2008 17:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Anyway, Charlie (the 11yo ^^^) loved this. Didn't think it was slow at all, and wasn't any more keen on WAU THAT BLOWED UP than DARK 'N' BROODY.

aldo, Saturday, 26 July 2008 18:14 (fifteen years ago) link

OH MY GOSH GUYS I JUST FOUND OUT AARON ECKHART IS MORMON

Abbott, Saturday, 26 July 2008 18:22 (fifteen years ago) link

MORMANG

BLACK BEYONCE, Saturday, 26 July 2008 20:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Moral -- do not dip your Mormons into gasoline.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 27 July 2008 06:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Saw it again tonight. Theater = packed. This film might yet eat the world.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 27 July 2008 06:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Re: That WSJ article:

What a weird comparison between George W Bush and Batman. I'm just stating the obvious here, but isn't the great dilemma for Batman in TDK that he refuses to kill anyone; even someone as heinous as the joker? And isn't there that scene where Harvey Dent is about to (maybe, sorta, kinda) torture the mentally handicapped guy and Batman stops him? How exactly does anyone reconcile the actual film with the Bush administration?

He didn't actually watch the film, did he.

Mordy, Sunday, 27 July 2008 06:31 (fifteen years ago) link

wellll, imo the most interesting question in the movie is "is batman responsible for the existence and actions of the joker/two-face e.g. is america responsible for the existence and actions of rogue states/terrorists" and the movie then explicitly and repeatedly lets batman off the hook

cankles, Sunday, 27 July 2008 07:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Just saw it. Felt like being beaten with a tire iron for three and a half hours. Impressive, but not much fun. Politically loathesome. Kinda hated it. Re: Mordy -- Batman & Gordon = heroicized version of the Bush admin. Point you make about Batman's unwillingness to kill is fair, but it doesn't undermine the analogy, which was never exact to begin with. Cankles kinda OTM, but while the film does suggest that Batman/Gordon created the conditions that caused the Joker's "terrorism" (film's language) to be unleashed, their only sin is that they were too idealistic, too darn hungry for justice. Their overwhelming goodness necessitated a backlash.

contenderizer, Sunday, 27 July 2008 08:41 (fifteen years ago) link

so what's with the "fives" in this movie?

five bank robbers killed at the beginning
five deaths before batman turns himself in (i forget who says this to him)
five people killed by two face (as gordon says at the end, "five dead, two of them cops")

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 27 July 2008 09:34 (fifteen years ago) link

oh wait, joker says it to batman in interrogation: "You let five people die. THEN you let Dent take your place."

moonship journey to baja, Sunday, 27 July 2008 09:36 (fifteen years ago) link

this was good as a superhero movie,(the post modern hero elements and the extremeness atmosphere of it) but the limitation of the genre and/or the hollywood cinematic cliches prevents it from being great.
also the "symbolism" of the relativeness of good,evil and power etc. is too explicit and over-written as the movie goes towards the end, and especially at the end itself.
Nolan and Ledger did a superb job here anyway, and it was totally entartaining nevertheless

Zeno, Sunday, 27 July 2008 12:12 (fifteen years ago) link

i read all this yesterday a day or two after seeing the film. lots of interesting points. on a pedantic geek note - SPOILER:

i thought that the warehouse death was pretty definite - rather than a cutaway there was a brief i guess cgi thing where the body/face was momentarily consumed by flames, illuminated. i don't think there's any way or purpose for the character coming back, anyway, when all logic dictates it would have been recovered, and there wouldn't have been a conspiratorial element to the death, especially given that it was already part of a trick.

but the film was great, and i hated the first batman film, it being a montage of au courant earnest boring martial arts shit and unexciting villains.

schlump, Sunday, 27 July 2008 12:20 (fifteen years ago) link

I have far too much nervous energy right now to sit and write a full out post on this, but here's a few thoughts:

- I loved the opening bank sequence. Such a bold, detached and totally brilliant operation. Death? Sure. But kill the guy who is an employee of the guys I want to give me license to run amok in Gotham? He doesn't leave any of the insiders alive, and his escape would ONLY work if timed perfectly. By the time the cops figure out he's driving a BUS during morning rush hour with 8 other buses, he'll be out of the bus and gone. And the nodding to the "Isn't he out?" was great.

- Damn. Ledger's Joker was...astounding. The hunched over shoulders at the beginning of the movie when he's picked up at the street corner, and again when he's staring down Bats on his Batcycle - total Big Boy from Dick Tracy. He's clearly fucked up in a very core, operating system sort of way. But he's smart and imaginative enough to be able to out think almost everybody, and when that doesn't work, he really has not problem killing people.

- I took the varied scar-origin stories to be him covering for something, or maybe an amalgamation of what his brain thinks led to the scars being there - like, his dad was a drunk and a fiend, but his ACTIONS put the scars there, not his knife.

- I tend to make bold calls when nothing is at stake, and I avoided all press between the first weekend's Rotten Tomatoes score and this morning because I didn't want to know how it ended. My prediction about the third movie: Maggie Gyllenhal returns for the third movie. As Catwoman.

- I think one guy not getting enough credit was Eric Roberts. His character was AWESOME. Total sleaze...total Eric Roberts...but really neat how, from very early on, he knows to just get the fuck out of the Joker's way. Like "My name's Paul, and I ain't getting shot!"

- Bale was Bale, only having less fun that he often seems to have. I always find, in all of his characters, a sense of real mischief in Bale's characters - "I know I shouldn't be doing this, but..." In that regard, he fit right in. His relationships with Alfred and Lucius were strained, and their witty banter was...covering for something.

Felt very overwhelmed by this movie - could have been the late night show I saw (I'm an early to bed guy), but more than likely the movie itself and its pretty unrelenting, long, sometimes-brutal story was something to get through. Still, I enjoyed it.

B.L.A.M., Sunday, 27 July 2008 16:49 (fifteen years ago) link

My comment to a friend about this movie was this:

Dude - when Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman are splitting Yoda duties, you really have to work to fuck the thing up.

B.L.A.M., Sunday, 27 July 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link

unrelenting is a great word to describe this flick - i had to piss like 5 minutes in & kept waiting for some kindve break. i left the second the hong kong sequence ended (boring chinese dude was getting interrogated it looked like), i think if indeed picked a good window that was about the only one. what a great movie.

deeznuts, Sunday, 27 July 2008 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I want to see it a third time, and have a free ticket, but IT'S STILL "NO PASSES ALLOWED" AT MY LOCAL THEATRE...COME ONNNNNNNN!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 27 July 2008 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link

300M O_O

i know like 3 people whove already seen this 3 times, it is the new titanic

deeznuts, Sunday, 27 July 2008 19:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Movie's already made like $350M.

kingfish, Sunday, 27 July 2008 19:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Not domestically -- they're figuring close to $320 million after today -- but it'll almost certainly hit that during this week.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 27 July 2008 19:24 (fifteen years ago) link

worldwide, at least.

kingfish, Sunday, 27 July 2008 19:34 (fifteen years ago) link

Just seen this - really loved it. It had everything.

SPOILERZ

i really need to see this again, especially the bit about saving harvey or rachel! i thought it was a head-fake of the movie to let us believe batman was after rachel, and really picking dent, not a trick of the joker's. hmmmm

Yeah, I thought this too, so did the people I went with. Batman seemed to have as much reason to want to save Dent (= Dent will save world, he can stop being Batman) as the girl. Not sure why they didn't send half the police squad to each.

It *was* fun, I can't understand why you wouldn't find fun in this film. Just loads and loads of awesome scenes. But I was surprised at the level of violence (mainly implied, but unnervingly effectively) for a 12A. e.g. the knives in mouths, pencil thing.

I might be naive but one of the refreshing things about this was that some cliches were often touched on but avoided e.g. joker's 'violent daddy' story - seems too silly and oddly placed for it to be anything other than a 'joke' (which it later reveals itself to be) but in another film this would have been a serious plot point. Also, the long shots of him in the prison cell with the shattered mirror shards behind him - leaving you to reach your own conclusions about exactly what would happen next, without feeling the need to then show you him using them. (Stupid plot point here, with the one guy guarding the room).

I was expecting some massive Joker mind-fuck on the ferry scenes. Joker was always two steps ahead of everyone throughout the film then let this big plan hinge on other people (granted, he did have his own detonators). The ferry scenes played out slightly weirdly. I was putting myself in the position of the "good" guy who was going to detonate but couldn't - and what would have been screaming in my head was 'he is a JOKER, yr not really gonna get blown up at midnight/the detonators really blow up kittens' etc. But it seemed like everyone on both ferries took the Joker seriously and the guy just 'bottled' because he couldn't be that guy. Also there would be riots before anyone could even hand out the voting papers, so I was bemused that there was enough order to all politely vote and then count up the votes while SECONDS TICKING TO DOOOOMMM.

Kept expecting Rachel to pop up all alive as we never saw her dead. Dent did have a few shots at the end were he was lying dead still though, right? Dent's scene with the Gordon family was the only slight let-down - pretty sudden character change there, holding a gun to a kid's head.

Not the real Village People, Monday, 28 July 2008 00:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh! And one of the mob baddies was out of Lucas + Walliams 90s boyband spoof, Boyz Unlimited, which along with Alpert from Lost and Agent Whatever from Prison Break pretty much made the movie for me.

Not the real Village People, Monday, 28 July 2008 00:11 (fifteen years ago) link

i saw it for the 2nd time last night. it *was* a trick on the part of the joker: he says: "he's at 250 52nd street, and she's at avenue x". gordon asks "where are you going" and batman says "rachel!". dent tells his men to converge on 250 52nd street, but when they get there, it's of course rachel in the warehouse and not dent.

i was surprised that nobody on the "upright citizens" boat was willing to think about all of the national guardsmen, police and transit workers on the other boat!!

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:00 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry, "gordon tells his men". i still have the problem of calling him harvey dent instead of gordon. because all harveys have walrus mustaches.

i want a pair of commissioner gordon glasses. anybody know what brand they are? they look sorta YSL but i doubt they'd pick YSL glasses for a guy like that.

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:01 (fifteen years ago) link

as far as plot points go, i assumed the 'joke' in the last bit was that each detonator actually triggered its own boat, not sure if there was anything to contradict that

deeznuts, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Did no-one else expect that the Joker had actually been sneaky and given them the detonators to their own boats but told them the opposite? I was expecting that to be the case and for the boat of "good people" to blow themselves up.

I thought this, and also that he would turn out to not even have a detonator to blow them both up with, such was his confidence that one of them would do it

Lots of subtle little Joker moments of greatness eg "I believe in Harvey Dent" sticker on the nurses' uniform, that awkward "....hi" as his opening greeting to the horrendously disfigured Dent, and particularly his surrendering his massive collection of knives upon his first arrest and sheepishly throwing down a potato peeler at the end

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:12 (fifteen years ago) link

"Let me get this straight; you're saying that your client, who is one of the richest and most powerful men in the world, spends his evenings brutalising criminals with his bare fists, and you are intending to blackmail him...?"

Was this supposed to be like "that is too far fetched for anyone to believe?" At this stage it seemed like people wanted to know who Batman was and a guy was very rich and had a lot of spare time might seem like a good shout, coming from a guy who worked for him and had like lovingly rendered pencil drawings of the Batmobile taken from his Applied Sciences department

if he was just saying like "if you out Batman he will straight batter you son" then that would be OK I suppose

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:16 (fifteen years ago) link

i think it was the 2nd

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:18 (fifteen years ago) link

it was def the latter, as i understood it - this guy is not only the ultimate badass as far as asskickings are concerned, but he could also buy you & just about anyone else on earth 700 thousand times over. blackmail away.

deeznuts, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:19 (fifteen years ago) link

didn't quite get why Batz picking Harvey or Rachel should've made that much difference, was it just because the Batmobile would've got there faster than regular ol' Police or something? Rachel being unexpectedly incinerated mid-sentence was kind of jarring even though some dickhead had already posted about her dying

I thought it was really great but by the time we're like 2hrs 25 in, the unpleasant death count's at about 400 and Harvey's holding a gun up to a child's head and making his dad have a conversation with him before he shoots him it was getting a bit like, take it easy, man

think pinefox's first long post is pretty spot on mostly

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:23 (fifteen years ago) link

did feel like it was a bit of a leap in logic to go "I need to take the blame for all this and become a pretend villain", when the Joker was obviously more to blame for the Dent killings than Batman, but I must just've been lost to the subtleties after 150 minutes of Intensity

Also probably couldn't stomach a rewatching to clarify this stuff anytime too soon, even though Heef's bits kind of make me wish I could

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:27 (fifteen years ago) link

I must just've been lost to the subtleties after 150 minutes of Intensity

I uh, might just have been a bit confused, rather

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:28 (fifteen years ago) link

i was surprised that nobody on the "upright citizens" boat was willing to think about all of the national guardsmen, police and transit workers on the other boat!!

This crossed my mind on the second viewing as well! (There are a few ways to answer this, I figure.)

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:28 (fifteen years ago) link

Never fear: the Noble Black Felon made the choice for them.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:29 (fifteen years ago) link

hahahaaha

deeznuts, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:29 (fifteen years ago) link

The Other Shawshank Redemption

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:31 (fifteen years ago) link

I am thinking maybe they didn't SHOW Rachel dead bcz to show whatever the hell was left of her would push it most defs into the R rating I'm still astonished it avoided. I thought it was pretty clear she was damn fucking dead, but OTOH I am the person that read all Tolkein's books thinking the Baggins were named "Bib-lo" and "Ford-o."

Abbott, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:32 (fifteen years ago) link

A renaming which would be utterly wonderful.

And yeah, she dead. I gather Emma Thomas, Nolan's wife and producer of his films, has said Harvey's death is meant to be more ambiguous.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:33 (fifteen years ago) link

that awkward "....hi" as his opening greeting to the horrendously disfigured Dent

haha yes! I saw it again a couple of days ago and cracked up so much at this bit. He looked for all the world like Dent's concerned mum trying to tell him his puppy had died.

Roz, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:35 (fifteen years ago) link

was waiting for him to show him his own face for the first time and complete his descent insanity

what is Harvey supposed to have died from, falling 15 feet? Wasn't entirely clear what had happened but it never occurred to me at any point that he wasn't mostly being set up as the main guy in the next one, and felt that they were shooting their wad on it a bit by cramming so much intense stuff with him into the last 10 minutes of an already exhausting ending

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:40 (fifteen years ago) link

like, he was all consumed with the need for revenge but he stopped to make one half of his suit jacket into some sequinned Ric Flair shit, surely that could've waited

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:42 (fifteen years ago) link

I took that look as being what happened to his suit after the car crash when he took out Eric Roberts' driver. A tasteful distressing, at least.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:45 (fifteen years ago) link

And yeah on the '...hi' moment too as being the one that hit me the most second time around -- but the 'puppy dog out of the police car window' bit dug in even deeper.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:46 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm waiting for someone to say they hated this, so I can get revved up again...

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:48 (fifteen years ago) link

[A huge still from the 'puppy dog' bit here BTW.]

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:49 (fifteen years ago) link

I wasn't that crazy about it! Pick me! Pick me!

I think my brother stated my opinions perfectly: "Maybe if Joker was still listening to Prince, the movie wouldn't have been as oppressive."

Abbott, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:50 (fifteen years ago) link

some other things i noticed the 2nd time around

1) when eric roberts goes to get in the car with his driver and bodyguard you can see dent's arms reach out of the shadows on the left side of the screen and pull the bodyguard off-camera. a real quick flash.

2) is it just me or was alan ruck (cameron from ferris bueller) on the boat at the end?

3) who was the truck driver from the car chase scene? the one with the joker? he looked very familiar.

moonship journey to baja, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:52 (fifteen years ago) link

movies are oppressive

deeznuts, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:54 (fifteen years ago) link

A number of the more understated performances felt stronger second time through -- Gary Oldman's in particular (no surprise, I loved him in the first film, best performance easy, but he holds his own better than I remembered first time through -- I'm thinking of the interrogation room scene with the Joker as a prime example).

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Why you being all grumpy-beared out, deez? All walkin' up to the pencil sharpener with your sharp pencil for an excuse to yank my pigtails again?

Abbott, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:56 (fifteen years ago) link

im not being grumpy, im saying thats a massive part of why i love this movie! as i said upthread

nothing to do w/ yr pigtails or my pencil

deeznuts, Monday, 28 July 2008 01:57 (fifteen years ago) link

haha re Prince: i honestly wanted Ledger to do a Joker version of his performance of "Can't Take My Eyes Off You" from 10 Things I Hate About You.

Gary Oldman was aces and Gordon easily my favourite character from both movies. I love the subtle change in his character between the two movies - the weary idealist cop now newly-energized and given a purpose. The old Gordon could never have jumped to the Mayor's defense the way he did, dude could barely operate a Batmobile.

Roz, Monday, 28 July 2008 02:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I took that look as being what happened to his suit after the car crash when he took out Eric Roberts' driver. A tasteful distressing, at least.

oh, ok, that's pretty good

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 08:54 (fifteen years ago) link

I took it as being the fact that he put on the same suit as he'd been wearing when HALF HIS HEAD WAS ON FIRE and that thusly it had got a bit charred around the lapel at the same time as his flesh melted off.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 28 July 2008 09:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Cosmo Landesman's error-strewn, liberal-baiting review in The Sunday Times makes interesting reading - http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/film_reviews/article4386375.ece

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 28 July 2008 11:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Please see movie again and give your review , I think you haven't seen movie yet. I think it is best movie from all batman's.

patel, london, uk

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Monday, 28 July 2008 11:30 (fifteen years ago) link

did feel like it was a bit of a leap in logic to go "I need to take the blame for all this and become a pretend villain", when the Joker was obviously more to blame for the Dent killings than Batman, but I must just've been lost to the subtleties after 150 minutes of Intensity

Revealing Harvey as being the person behind the side rampage would deal a major blow to the legitimacy of his crusade to clean up Gotham. The Joker was rather visibly shown tied directly to the ferry nonsense, all of which was a big distraction to allow Harvey to go on his vendetta and pull the fangs from his crusade.

HI DERE, Monday, 28 July 2008 11:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Isn't critiquing TDK for not being a serious 9/11 analogy a bit disingenuous? I don't remember any super explicit 9/11 references. So unless calling someone a terrorist is now keyword Twin Towers, it isn't necessarily an analogy for anti-Western World terror. And I know that lots of critics keep calling it a 9/11 reference, but if you don't feel the same way (as a critique), that doesn't lesson the flick. That just means you disagree with other critiques. (This is really pointed at that Landesman review, but I saw another critique write that he refuses to see the flick because he doesn't like that film critiques are treating it like a serious film and not a silly blockbuster. He then confirmed that he had no issue with the flick, just with its coverage.)

Mordy, Monday, 28 July 2008 12:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Another critic*. I love that que, apparently.

Mordy, Monday, 28 July 2008 12:56 (fifteen years ago) link

I hate that I feel like I need to defend this flick against bad reviews. After all, as much as I liked it, I don't think it was the best film ever. And I think a lot of the criticisms of it (especially in this thread - about it's humorlessness and relentlessness) are valid. But it really does feel like a lot of the MSM reviewers didn't bother watching the film, but just read The Week film section.

Mordy, Monday, 28 July 2008 13:05 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't see how anyone could possibly call this movie humorless.

HI DERE, Monday, 28 July 2008 14:15 (fifteen years ago) link

I can see how certain parts of the film - like the Batman voice - seem pretty humorless.

Mordy, Monday, 28 July 2008 14:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, but that's certain parts, not the whole thing! Calling the movie flat-out humorless is ridiculous -- calling it relentless as a negative is personal taste at play but I take it as far more of a positive. (Obviously not blaming you, Mordy.)

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 14:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah. I'm just saying, some of those comments actually have *some* validity. Unlike stuff like, "This was a bad 9/11 analogy!" or "Critics like this movie too much, so I don't!" or "Batman is a justification for the Bush Administration." None of which, ya know, have any basis in reality.

Mordy, Monday, 28 July 2008 14:24 (fifteen years ago) link

"....hi", potato peeler, pencil trick*, "I believe in Harvey Dent" sticker, nurse uniformed Joker clumsily mashing buttons on detonator and staggering round outside hospital before it explodes, Asshole Wayne shrugging off his heroic prevention of vehicular homicide as him just trying to beat the traffic light = all funny

*this gag is the spiritual heir to that Homer vs Smithers fight where Smithers unlocks a safe while laughing evilly, and uses the door to hit Homer in the head when he leans in to see why he's doing it, and is therefore massively funny despite the idea of a human brain being destroyed by wood and graphite being disturbing

MPx4A, Monday, 28 July 2008 14:42 (fifteen years ago) link

hahahahaha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2yv8aT0UFc

and what, Monday, 28 July 2008 15:33 (fifteen years ago) link

I like that. Saw it the other day.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 15:36 (fifteen years ago) link

lol wait a minute this really has the guy from suddenly susan in it????

and what, Monday, 28 July 2008 15:39 (fifteen years ago) link

You mean the guy from the live-action Tick series and Lost! Paradigm shift!

David R., Monday, 28 July 2008 15:41 (fifteen years ago) link

The second half was good, after Maggie G got blown-up. I don't mean it to sound like I enjoyed Maggie G getting blown-up, it's just that seemed to be the pivotal moment and it didn't drag so much after that.

jel --, Monday, 28 July 2008 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link

How did it drag before that????

HI DERE, Monday, 28 July 2008 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Dunno, it just seemed to.

jel --, Monday, 28 July 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link

I probably went too early in the morning.

jel --, Monday, 28 July 2008 16:04 (fifteen years ago) link

i might as well say it again cause it's fun - I love BATMANUEL in this.

Roz, Monday, 28 July 2008 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link

"....hi", potato peeler, pencil trick*, "I believe in Harvey Dent" sticker, nurse uniformed Joker clumsily mashing buttons on detonator and staggering round outside hospital before it explodes, Asshole Wayne shrugging off his heroic prevention of vehicular homicide as him just trying to beat the traffic light = all funny

yeah, it definitely wasnt humorless, but most of the humor was dark & centered around the joker (the biggest laughs at the showing i went to came when he blew up the hospital) - i also got more than a few laughs from bale's wayne/bateman persona

deeznuts, Monday, 28 July 2008 16:39 (fifteen years ago) link

A follow-up blog post.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:04 (fifteen years ago) link

it's not humourless if you want to be pedantic about the definition of the word but it was a bit monolithic. I enjoyed it but it didn't deal with anything in any kind of subtle way, just sort of bludgeoned through. so it was a summer blockbuster, what do you expect, but it didn't really make me think, not much anyway.

just because it wasn't cringe inducingly stupid like so many other summer blockbusters, because it was too serious and intense to be stupid, that doesn't make it an amazing film.

eg if I'm thinking of relentless the bourne films had me far far more hyped and physically tired at the end than this.

Ronan, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

Ronan, I agree with you.

Abbott, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:11 (fifteen years ago) link

No one's commenting on my post anymore, thank goodness, but I've gotten emails all weekend as the film's fans watch it a second time.

(xxpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Dare I ask how printable they are.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link

"snob" is one of the politer things I was called.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Charming.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:18 (fifteen years ago) link

I like that one!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Hahaha! Well that's all right, then!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link

I think my biggest laugh went to Morgan Freeman pointing out the ludicrousness of attempting to frame Batman.

HI DERE, Monday, 28 July 2008 19:13 (fifteen years ago) link

I did love that. Probably his best moment in the film.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 July 2008 19:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Re: Humorless. DK had lots of jokey bits and even a few big laughs, but it's basic spirit and view of life felt humorless. It functioned in a humorless manner and took the idea of seriousness very seriously. Compare with Hellboy II, which has a humorous vision of the (in)human condition and doesn't take itself at all seriously. Biggest laugh here was Joker's pencil in the eye trick, grisly as it may have been.

Still think the exceedingly inexact "good guys = Bush admin" analogy holds water, though that seems to be a minority opinion. Alfred's story about his experience fighting the thief in the forest plays into this (especially the bit about what they did in the end). So does the characterization of Joker as a terrorist and the nature of his motivations. Batman's cell-phone-enabled sonar/spying apparatus too. Maybe more than anything else, I was struck by the film's concluding insistence that symbolism is more important than truth. That "the right thing" for governmental authorites faced with difficult situations may be to maintain secrecy while manufacturing lies that will motivate people towards ends that are ostensibly in everybody's best interest. Very Bush/Cheney-style moral there. I don't know how intentional this subtext is, but it's hard to miss, and at least worth thinking/talking about.

contenderizer, Monday, 28 July 2008 20:16 (fifteen years ago) link

**SPOILER?**

Saw this today. Looked great but the total opposite of the previous film for me. This felt like Michael Mann with (even more!) ADD. Batman pretty uncompelling as a character in this one - though LOVED the shots of him flying over the city, or from building to building. I felt Eckhart was ahead of Ledger in the "portrayal of a loony" dept. I can't wait to see more of his Two-Face. Ledger as Joker fairly meh for me. Oddly the only characters I felt some real pity for here were his and Oldman's. Gyllenhaal's a wet blanket.

Capitaine Jay Vee, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:23 (fifteen years ago) link

"his"= Eckhart's

Capitaine Jay Vee, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:24 (fifteen years ago) link

yep, I agree Eckhart gave the best display here, but then he was also the best character.....the Joker was one dimensional, zero development, just like Batman

Ronan, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:27 (fifteen years ago) link

who the hell wants the Joker to develop?

latebloomer, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:31 (fifteen years ago) link

when I saw this some guy in the front row went completely crazy in the last 5 minutes saying "it's not funny" "See he's dead. it's not funny" "You want to asskick, I'll asskick!" "I know the manager, I know the police!" It was surreal.

bnw, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:32 (fifteen years ago) link

The Joker was the three chord punk song.
Also, awesome.

Popture, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:32 (fifteen years ago) link

just want him to be interesting even, he just did a few violent setpieces which, like a lot of this film, were not actually that shocking/horrific.

Ronan, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Alfred's story about his experience fighting the thief in the forest plays into this (especially the bit about what they did in the end).

I thought the entire point of the monologue was Alfred not-so-subtly warning Bruce that, in all likelihood, Batman would have to destroy the very city he's trying to save in order to get rid of the Joker.

Pretty much everything that's being used as evidence to equate Batman to the Bush administration were the points in the movie where other characters were explicitly saying, "Okay Batman, at this point you are fucking up royally." The propaganda thing with Harvey at the end is a criticism you can level at either political party; it rings truer with the Republicans because they've had the figurehead in office for the past 8 years but don't think for a second that those types of shenanigans haven't applied to every single President we've had.

The Joker was reasonably multidimensional; it's just that none of his dimensions were particularly laudable. I think the self-loathing analysis is almost completely OTM; where it falls down is that I think he hates everyone else just a little bit more than he hates himself, ergo his need to pull everyone around him down to his level.

HI DERE, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:33 (fifteen years ago) link

You guys know WAY too much about my extracurricular activities.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 28 July 2008 22:56 (fifteen years ago) link

ok, batman suffering from LIBERAL guilt???

if anything the movie is a giant conservative apologetic

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:27 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the movie goes to great lengths to call into question Batman's methods and motives...if anything i guess the great sin of the movie is that our moral outrage is so numbed in the current cultural climate that batman pointlessly beating a suspect or spying on the general populace, or lying to them "for their own good" that these things are not OBVIOUSLY seen as bad anymore...which says more about the fact that the film is misreading the cultural climate than the politics of the film itself (which are liberal to my mind but ambiguous at best).

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:31 (fifteen years ago) link

god that was garbled, hope the point is not lost.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Loved the Joker and Lucius talking to the blackmailer. The rest was kind of eh.

milo z, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:34 (fifteen years ago) link

it's probably wrong to think that Batman is wrongly pursued at the end of the movie...on some level he deserves it....his lack of faith in the people of gotham provokes it. (and his lack of faith is probably wrong...they dont blow each other up, for example)

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Is the idea that the public can not be trusted with/interpret the truth a liberal or conservative idea?

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:35 (fifteen years ago) link

it's certainly authoritarian. It's like the fucking Dostoevsky's Grand Inquistor speech.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:37 (fifteen years ago) link

Is the idea that the public can not be trusted with/interpret the truth a liberal or conservative idea?

yes

HI DERE, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:41 (fifteen years ago) link

lol

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:44 (fifteen years ago) link

it's probably wrong to think that Batman is wrongly pursued at the end of the movie...on some level he deserves it....his lack of faith in the people of gotham provokes it. (and his lack of faith is probably wrong...they dont blow each other up, for example)

This is an interesting idea to chew on until I see the film again.

Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 02:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Just thought I'd pop in to add my vote to the "BEST MOVIE EVER" column.

Jeff Treppel, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 03:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Just saw it tonight finally. STill dazed by the heaviness of it all, but loved it. This might sound REALLY dumb, but the final scene, with Gordon's son calling out to Batman left me with 'Shane' goosebumps. Perfectly tearjerky. Maybe overdone for others, but gave a nice finality, and hammered home Gordon's 'dark knight' speech. Loved it. Definitely seeing it again. And Heath. Attaboy tiger.

VegemiteGrrrl, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 03:23 (fifteen years ago) link

saw it a third time tonight. safe to say I won't see it again until the DVD release. begun to memorize too much of it.

still enjoyable though

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 04:51 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm debating donating another $10+ to see this in IMAX for a 2nd time (3rd overall), if only to enjoy the IMAX experience (IMAX!) w/out a 5-year-old girl in my goddamn row crying after every explosion, gurgling during every key bit of exposition and BANGING HER CHAIR for the final 30-45 minutes. (Morbs wannabes w/ "exposition" zingers can save it for the Film Comment mailbag.)

NB: I will pay $1-2 extra if movie theaters set up in-house daycare for lazy-ass families that think it makes sense to take kids to the theatre if they actually think taking their kids to movies like this or 30 Days of Night sounds like a good way to kill 90+ minutes, for the love of shit.

Kind of stunned this has already made more US $$$ than Indiana Jones after just 2 weeks.

David R., Tuesday, 29 July 2008 05:08 (fifteen years ago) link

There's a thought in that 2nd paragraph, somewhere...

David R., Tuesday, 29 July 2008 05:08 (fifteen years ago) link

that sounds as bad as the lady who was making orgasmic noises during every violent scene of No Country for Old Men....my friend and I couldn't stop laughing

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 05:10 (fifteen years ago) link

but the final scene, with Gordon's son calling out to Batman left me with 'Shane' goosebumps

Hahah, I was thinking about this tonight myself! I'm surprised I haven't seen it referenced around more but it's a pretty obvious nod.

Kind of stunned this has already made more US $$$ than Indiana Jones after just 2 weeks.

Less than 2 weeks even! I suppose I'd be stunned if the Indiana Jones movie had been a truly good film...

LA Times piece on the now standard 'will it beat Titanic?' buzz. I doubt it but you never know; couple of good bits:

Distribution executives have started debating in earnest the potential total "Dark Knight" haul, which already has passed $300 million and is projected to eclipse the $400-million mark on Aug. 4 or 5. Although half a dozen industry insiders surveyed Monday said "Titanic's" record appeared safe for now, the majority of distribution executives placed the film's probable final gross just past $500 million, thanks in part to repeat business from across the audience spectrum.

...

"The Dark Knight" is also drawing a steady stream of repeaters; one rival distribution executive said his teenage kids had seen the film three times. And that kind of can't-get-enough interest has helped start the "Titanic" comparisons.

"We are honored to be considered in that company," said Dan Fellman, the domestic distribution chief for Warner Bros. "But I think 'Titanic' will hold that record for eternity."

...

"This has become a cultural phenomenon on so many levels," said Greg Foster, the president for Imax Filmed Entertainment, whose "Dark Knight" sales have surpassed $16.4 million, a record. "Even my dad [septuagenarian movie producer David Foster] has seen it three times."

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 05:15 (fifteen years ago) link

that sounds as bad as the lady who was making orgasmic noises during every violent scene of No Country for Old Men

Would've preferred that to College Bro sneaking beers into No Country, muttering to his pals throughout, scoffing vocally during the 2nd half, then pronouncing that the movie SUCKED SO HARD (paraphrase) right after the final credits started.

To be fair to Indy, it's pulled in $400+ million overseas, so Batsy's got some work to do.

David R., Tuesday, 29 July 2008 05:18 (fifteen years ago) link

wtf was up with those idiots at NCFOM. At the very end, some dumb redneck shouted "piece of sheeeeeeeeeitt!", and the sheep around him almost applauded him. as if they couldn't fathom a movie that didn't have a tidy conclusion where the bad guys lose.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 05:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Saw this again last night; it holds up. My reaction wasn't as viscerally thrilled and "wow!" as the first time, but the couple of bits I thought were overcooked didn't bother me as much as I thought they might have (moral black prisoner; Gordon's final speech). I'd go again, I think.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 06:39 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the movie goes to great lengths to call into question Batman's methods and motives...if anything i guess the great sin of the movie is that our moral outrage is so numbed in the current cultural climate that batman pointlessly beating a suspect or spying on the general populace, or lying to them "for their own good" that these things are not OBVIOUSLY seen as bad anymore

agree with this 100 per cent. but the bigger problem is that it's an action movie, these guys are being immoral constantly, they kill people all the time! the bit with the spying on people was intensely stupid.

I mean seriously did anyone think "OH BATMAN, FOR SHAME, FROM SUCH HEIGHTS YOU HAVE NOW FALLEN"?

Ronan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 06:49 (fifteen years ago) link

^^ and it is weird, that moral stance of it... and there's a cultural aspect to it as well - Americans (Westerners?) are very bothered by the idea of spying on its citizens but we way out here in "paternalistic, authoritarian" (obvs not my terminology) Southeast Asia just kind of look at that sonar thing and think "Wow, that's awesome. Now Batman can save everybody!". That was my sister's reaction, by the way, and it took her more than a second before realizing that, when Lucius said "This is.. WRONG", he wasn't joking. so yeah it was interesting to see what seemed like an obvious moral argument play out in a different cultural context to different conclusions.

and yes i know this is kind of incoherent and I'm generalizing about everything here - i just thought it was interesting to think about and I'm leaving the house in a few minutes anyway.

Roz, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 07:31 (fifteen years ago) link

My reaction wasn't as viscerally thrilled and "wow!" as the first time, but the couple of bits I thought were overcooked didn't bother me as much as I thought they might have

How disappointing.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 12:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Misery guts.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 12:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Pretty much everything that's being used as evidence to equate Batman to the Bush administration were the points in the movie where other characters were explicitly saying, "Okay Batman, at this point you are fucking up royally." The propaganda thing with Harvey at the end is a criticism you can level at either political party; it rings truer with the Republicans because they've had the figurehead in office for the past 8 years but don't think for a second that those types of shenanigans haven't applied to every single President we've had.

-- HI DERE

Sure, all politicians sometimes (often) stress the symbolic over the actual -- that's the nature of the beast -- but the film's concluding moral still applies better to the Bush administration than to any other in recent American history. Reagan's maybe comes close, but was nowhere near so perversely blatant about it's secrecy, nor so smug about it's authoritarian paternalism.

if anything the movie is a giant conservative apologetic

-- roxymuzak

OTM. I'm genuinely surprised that this argument (Batman = Bush admin.) is at all controversial. The analogy isn't the movie's primary focus, and it's not wholly coherent, but I thought it was almost absurdly explicit.

Batman has to make the tough choices in fighting crime/terrorism. In doing so, he runs enormous risks, both political and personal. He isn't perfect, and his imperfections (authoritarianism, brutality, ambition, lack of faith/trust in others) put his mission and his people at risk. But when you come right down to it, he is a man of integrity and honor, and no one else is willing or able to do the dirty work. While he crosses certain lines (riling up maniacal fiends, brutalizing/torturing suspects, domestic spying), he's only doing what's necessary. In the end, he retreats, honorably shouldering a burden of blame he doesn't really deserve, so that a newer, more hopeful symbol can lead and inspire his people. From where I sit, the implications are pretty clear...

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Interesting that "brutalizing/torturing suspects" is "only doing what's necessary"....

kingfish, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Remind me again how the first movie ended?

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm genuinely surprised that this argument (Batman = Bush admin.) is at all controversial.

I'm sure you and Spencer Ackerman will be happy trading notes.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:10 (fifteen years ago) link

well i never heard this idea until just now.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:11 (fifteen years ago) link

No one thinks bush is as virtuous as Batman. The moral ambiguity only applies to someone with intentions as good as Batman! So I don't think the film needs to be held to the idea that it thinks bush is virtuous, when no argument or allusion as such is made in the movie. In fact I'd say the film is extremely critical of authority figures, and it suggests that vigilantes are hypocrites. Batman holds others to a higher standard than himself. He is not a victim at the end of the movie. Hence my mention of the grand inquisitor upthread.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:19 (fifteen years ago) link

No one thinks bush is as virtuous as Batman

I know some people who might disagree with you.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:22 (fifteen years ago) link

I mean you just as easily read the film as saying that bush has fallen to the jokers level.

Xpost: you're right! But they are nuts.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:23 (fifteen years ago) link

ryan otm, the parallels were striking & obvious, but a)the surveillance equipment was destroyed, b) george w bush is not fucking batman

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:25 (fifteen years ago) link

I mean you just as easily read the film as saying that bush has fallen to the jokers level.

true, manipulation & deceit also being key facets of the bush admin

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:26 (fifteen years ago) link

A lot of this stuff is implicit in the nature of the Batman character, being as he is, you know, a vigilante. Vigilantism -- at least as it manifests itself as individuals doing what needs to be done to preserve order and the law if the government itself isn't up to the task -- is a pretty conservative notion. But I think reading this movie as a Bush admin apologetic particularly is sorta nonsense, especially as Batman is ultimately at least partially successful at what he does.

You want liberal superheros, wait for a Green Arrow movie.

Pancakes Hackman, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:27 (fifteen years ago) link

the thing is some of you guys are reading this ass-backwards - it's like, here we have a superhero, but he's doing all this stuff we ethically object to - might as well comment on it instead of tossing it under the rug. its excusing the characters actions, not the motherfucking bush administrations. this is such a preposterous argument yr making contenderizer

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:28 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't think it's preposterous to think there's a parallel, but it is kind of silly to think this movie is seriously making an argument in favor of bush, even as an allegory.

latebloomer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Thanks for pointing that out, Ned -- hadn't read it. Much more finely nuanced and better supported than my argument, but yeah, I'm basically saying the same thing. Ackerman's point about the essentially Phyrric nature of Batman's tactics and eventual victory is especially interesting. The film doesn't quite condone what Batman does or must become in order to fight the Joker/terrorism -- in fact, like Lucius and Alfred, it expresses strong reservations -- but it does accept the necessity. And I suspect that's very much the way Cheney would privately characterize Bush admin. policies. Not so much that they always, unambiguously did "the right thing", but that they did what had to be done -- knowing full well that it wouldn't sit right with a lot of people who didn't have to make the hard choices.

From the Ackerman piece, regarding Batman's tragic, hunted withdrawal to the darkness at the film's conclusion:

In so doing, Nolan's version of Batman is motivated by moral philosopher Michael Walzer's "dirty hands" argument. Walzer grappled with the problems on display in "The Dark Knight" and proposed, in an influential 1973 essay, that the key to engaging in morally dubious activities, like torture, during times of emergency is to acknowledge their heinousness and, once the emergency passes, accept legal sanction for the burden of saving the world.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:33 (fifteen years ago) link

there ARE parallels, definitely, & obviously intentional ones (the surveillance thing was whacking you over the head) - whereas before bush you mightve had batman doing that same shit & itd just be like WHOA BADASS now you have morgan freeman standing in their as yr conscience saying dude thats fucked up then blowing it up at the end xp

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TROOTH!

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

The film doesn't quite condone what Batman does or must become in order to fight the Joker/terrorism -- in fact, like Lucius and Alfred, it expresses strong reservations -- but it does accept the necessity. And I suspect that's very much the way Cheney would privately characterize Bush admin. policies.

the difference is that one is a somewhat thoughtful take on a comic book movie & one has killed hundreds of thousands of people

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:36 (fifteen years ago) link

What this actually makes me think more obliquely of is the nature of 'Gotham' as a location/society -- with Nolan making the Batman universe more realistic, Gotham shifts from being a generalized representation of 'the city' to something much more concrete, a location in the here and now just like, say, Hong Kong. And where there's an interesting bit of cognitive dissonance lies in what in the movie (and arguably the previous one but even more so here) appears to be Gotham's isolation from American society -- the most we get is the National Guard, and that only towards the end (whereas in the real world we'd now expect the FBI to have been crawling all over this, statements from the President, etc., at least as everything ratchets up further). It's an interesting dilemma that's ultimately insoluble in terms of strict dramatic representation, but it doesn't cripple the film.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:40 (fifteen years ago) link

No one thinks bush is as virtuous as Batman. The moral ambiguity only applies to someone with intentions as good as Batman! So I don't think the film needs to be held to the idea that it thinks bush is virtuous, when no argument or allusion as such is made in the movie. In fact I'd say the film is extremely critical of authority figures, and it suggests that vigilantes are hypocrites. Batman holds others to a higher standard than himself. He is not a victim at the end of the movie. Hence my mention of the grand inquisitor upthread.
LOTS of people think that Bush is every bit as heroic as the Batman, and that his intentions are at least equally good. And the film is not at all "critical of authority figures". It features three such characters in primary roles (The Mayor, Harvey Dent, and Jim Gordon), and does not question any of them to any significant degree. And while Batman is certainly "not a victim at the end of the movie", he willingly accepts a disproportionate burden of blame. After all, he was only trying to do right, and it's hard to say that anyone else could have done better.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:42 (fifteen years ago) link

the difference is that one is a somewhat thoughtful take on a comic book movie & one has killed hundreds of thousands of people

-- deeznuts

You did this with Fight Club in that Fincher thread, too, deez. Films can operate on more than one level. And pretending that a negative view of the Bush admin. is the only one possible is perhaps blinding you to what this film is actually saying.

It's an interesting dilemma that's ultimately insoluble in terms of strict dramatic representation, but it doesn't cripple the film.

-- Ned Ragget

The point yr making is valid, but odd. The Dark Knight never for a moment felt "realistic" to me, so I wasn't bothered by its many absurdities. I just accepted it as a very grisly, brutal fairy tale.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:49 (fifteen years ago) link

contenderizer, how should the movie have handled the political tangles it was gonna get itself into? ignore them? ultimately be an anti-batman movie? because of a bunch of cocksuckers in the white house? i dont think so.

xp i dont think it has a negative view of the bush admin

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:50 (fifteen years ago) link

just because the movie takes the time & energy to provoke a little thought & comment on some of the questionable actions of its superhero, the fact that it ultimately comes down on his side does not mean its supportive of the bush administration, it means its a goddamn batman movie

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:53 (fifteen years ago) link

The "goodness" of authority is seen as an illusion that the people somehow deserve to have foisted on to them! Dent's goodness is corrupted. Gordon is good but he does go along with Batman (interesting to note he he decieves his own wife though...worth thinking about)

I don't think the film has to take a side in these ethical dilemmas, by the way! That's the advantage of being a movie.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:54 (fifteen years ago) link

I do think Nolan is very philosophically inclined. All his movies tend to end in aporias, as well as being pretty pessimistic.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:57 (fifteen years ago) link

if a movie comes out, in 2008, with an unmissably pro- attitude to torture, wiretapping, extra-legal violence by authority, all in the name of security, bush is in that movie.

goole, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:57 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't see that movie you speak of goole!

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:58 (fifteen years ago) link

'unmissably' maybe, but definitely not 'unambiguously'

xp

max, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:59 (fifteen years ago) link

i didnt either

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 18:59 (fifteen years ago) link

what i really meant to say was 'stfu deeznuts'

goole, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:00 (fifteen years ago) link

you really dont get the idea of making a genre movie & examining that genre w/out subverting it do you

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:00 (fifteen years ago) link

if it helps ,i have repeatedly said that bush is very much in the movie

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Plus all this goes back to western mythology as stated above. See the end of the searchers, for instance. The anti-hero creates the possibility for the home on the range but he must be excluded from it. These ideas certainly predate bush.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:03 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm not sure why the film has to be an explicit condemnation or vindication of the bush administration. I prefer the idea that tdk reflects ideas in society at large as moral conundrums to be examined and worked through. again I'll ask the question, does anyone walk out of the theater feeling upbeat about a superhero triumphing over evil? or are they left with conflicted feelings about heroism after a brutalizing confrontation with evil? and how does this not reflect the current national mood?

Edward III, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:07 (fifteen years ago) link

don't think the film has to take a side in these ethical dilemmas, by the way! That's the advantage of being a movie.

-- ryan

But it does ultimately take sides, that's the thing. It does this with intellectual reservations, with a clear sense of the tragic compromises involved, but with all its heart. As the Batman rides off in the final scene, there's no doubt that the film is emotionally with him 100%.

Now, there's nothing wrong with any of this. Nolan's free to make whatever kind of film he wants. But given my own beliefs, I was a bit troubled by The Dark Knight -- especially in light of its MASSIVE popularity and the broad public reluctance to admit its obvious political subtext. I don't think, as deez suggests, Nolan should have made an "anti-Batman" movie, but he could have very easily made a different kind of Batman movie.

For what it's worth, while I was restless/bored during most of the last hour, and while I came out of the theater with very mixed feelings, a lot of it was cool as hell and I'm looking forward to seeing it again.

These ideas certainly predate bush.

-ryan

Yes, but to make THIS movie in THIS moment is to at least flirt with endorsing Bush admin. war-on-terror policies. While movies aren't necessarily political arguments, they don't occur in a vacuum, either.

Goole OTM.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:07 (fifteen years ago) link

That's well said contenderizer, but I can't agree about the film's intentions. And also Edward III otm.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:11 (fifteen years ago) link

the people of gotham and what they believe about gotham are the hidden part of all this. wayne set out not to be a vigilante but to 'become a symbol.' a symbol that simultaneously meant fear to criminals but hope and, what, retribution? to a fearful populace. this doesn't really work, so he needs dent to be the one to make people believe. i think that's really interesting and it kind of gets lost -- underlying the whole force/legitemacy theme is the idea that ordinary people's beliefs in their own safety are the key element to that safety. it's got a very broken-windows mentality, i don't know what i think about that. step one in saving a city: get the people to stop being afraid. step one in stopping the fear: save the city. every character seems to be on the edge of figuring out that they're stuck on a loop, but there's always another bomb going off.

there are other movies about the morality of vigiliantism but none have so many characters calling out 'what will the people think now?'

xps no i'm not otm, really, bush being 'in' the movie isn't an endorsement one way or another. of COURSE a high-tech vigilante movie from this year has a wiretapping reference, and of COURSE someone objects

goole, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:12 (fifteen years ago) link

"while I came out of the theater with very mixed feelings, a lot of it was cool as hell and I'm looking forward to seeing it again."

"there are other movies about the morality of vigiliantism but none have so many characters calling out 'what will the people think now?'"

"does anyone walk out of the theater feeling upbeat about a superhero triumphing over evil? or are they left with conflicted feelings about heroism after a brutalizing confrontation with evil? and how does this not reflect the current national mood?"

why are we arguing again? (that was really beautifully said btw edward)

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:21 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost

Fair enough, goole, and the wiretapping reference really was the thing that pushed it over the edge for me. But there's more to it than just that.

I, too, was intrigued/mystified by the movie's focus on "the people" as this not-so-mysterious herd being manipulated by symbolic contrivances. The Batman has always been concerned with what he represents, both to criminals and (to a lesser extent) to the public at large, but this film pushed that angle almost to the breaking point. It was very hard for me to accept the public need for Dent the way Batman and Gordon did. Especially since, in the end, the mob has been crippled by both Batman and the Joker.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm about to see this in IMAX in about 40 minutes. So I'm sure ill change my mind about all of this!

It's also worth noting that Nolan probably has at least the idea of a sequel in mind, so who knows where this is going as far as intention goes.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:27 (fifteen years ago) link

"Fair enough, goole, and the wiretapping reference really was the thing that pushed it over the edge for me. But there's more to it than just that."

the wirtetapping basically reference goes:

batman: hey look i can spy on the whole fuckin city!
lucius: fucked up. dont do that, asshole. youre not good enough.
batman: i know im not! but YOU are.
lucius: ok whatever fine.

[batman apprehends joker using this system]
[freeman blows it the fuck up]

in other words, the film has extraordinarily mixed feelings about its own superhero using this power - in fact, its superhero doesnt even trust himself with it. and in the end, its destroyed by the one man he does trust.

how can this really be read as 'pro-wiretapping', esp when its done by a faceless monolithic entity like the NSA? if anything id read it as very much anti-wiretapping (keep in mind this wasnt just wiretapping but that batman/freeman could actually SEE YOU AT ALL TIMES - spooky shit!)

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:28 (fifteen years ago) link

Free-man!

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:30 (fifteen years ago) link

like i said, the debate w/in the movie is more like an excuse for this hero using this technology at this particular time, while taking the time to point out that like, in the real world, this shit doesnt fly. somewhat ambiguously, yes, but who wants a superhero movie with a an actual political agenda?? xp lol

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:31 (fifteen years ago) link

who wants a superhero movie with a an actual political agenda??

Warner Bros sure hopes you do come March.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:32 (fifteen years ago) link

The film's argument is basically this: Domestic wiretapping ("spying on six-million people", in Lucius' words) is a terrible thing. But, as evil as it seems, it may be an absolute necessity. Given the circumstances, aren't we lucky that only the best-of-the-best good guys are doing it?

the movie is more like an excuse for this hero using this technology at this particular time, while taking the time to point out that like, in the real world, this shit doesnt fly.
I think that's exactly how Bush/Cheney would justify their actions. They'd say that under normal circumstances, it should NEVER be considered, much less permitted. But we weren't operating under normal circumstances...

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:34 (fifteen years ago) link

It was very hard for me to accept the public need for Dent the way Batman and Gordon did. Especially since, in the end, the mob has been crippled by both Batman and the Joker.

exactly! they need someone on their side who can actually appear in public, has a real name and face, that they can vote for, etc. it seemed reasonable to me.

Jordan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:35 (fifteen years ago) link

going to see this tomorrow night (finally!) - STAY TUNED

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:36 (fifteen years ago) link

it may be an absolute

bnw, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:37 (fifteen years ago) link

ha i hope you havent been reading this thread, ive been ignoring avoiding spoiler type shit for awhile

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:37 (fifteen years ago) link

thanks... in a way this discussion has come back around to what the pinefox and I were debating upstream. mainly about how bringing your moral viewpoint to the movies can blind you to what a movie's really trying to convey.

whether you're pro or anti-bush, if you watch tdk with an eye towards how the movie is supporting or violating your political beliefs, you're not going to get the full impact. this discussion gets a lot more interesting when we admit that there isn't a simple answer to the question of whose side this movie is on.

also, imagine christopher nolan walking into a room full of hollywood bigwigs and pitching his $180M-before-marketing-costs blockbuster as "the batman is dubya".

Edward III, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:40 (fifteen years ago) link

"...may be an absolute necessity..." Sounds goofy, but what I meant is that even if the necessity IS absolute, we're denied total certainty. I'm a relativist trying to talk about absolutes, so of course things get a little muddy.

they need someone on their side who can actually appear in public, has a real name and face, that they can vote for, etc. it seemed reasonable to me.

-- Jordan

Me too, for the first couple hours. But I was talking about the film's final act, where Batman and Gordon continue to insist on the public need for Dent as a symbol, when the mob has been all but crushed, and Dent will never again apear in public or on a ballot. That's what mystified me, to the point where it all came to seem a bit silly.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:45 (fifteen years ago) link

"The film's argument is basically this: Domestic wiretapping ("spying on six-million people", in Lucius' words) is a terrible thing. But, as evil as it seems, it may be an absolute necessity. Given the circumstances, aren't we lucky that only the best-of-the-best good guys are doing it?"

the best of the best good guys? as in SUPERHEROES? yes, we are very lucky to have superheroes like batman/dick cheney walking amongst us.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:47 (fifteen years ago) link

really? I imagine that although dent went down in flames (hur hur) the promise that someone could relieve batman + gordon from living the life they were leading (the dark vigilante and his covert enabler) was still an ideal worth pursuing for them (and us).

xpost to contenderizer

Edward III, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:50 (fifteen years ago) link

it's still probably better to have dent as a martyr than as another symbol that the joker won (by turning good citizens into murderers and criminals), but i see what you mean.

xp

Jordan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:51 (fifteen years ago) link

whether you're pro or anti-bush, if you watch tdk with an eye towards how the movie is supporting or violating your political beliefs, you're not going to get the full impact. this discussion gets a lot more interesting when we admit that there isn't a simple answer to the question of whose side this movie is on.

also, imagine christopher nolan walking into a room full of hollywood bigwigs and pitching his $180M-before-marketing-costs blockbuster as "the batman is dubya".

-- Edward III

Does it get more interesting, though? Insisting that this is simply a grey area film for gray area times doesn't really set my imagination on fire.

For what it's worth, I didn't watch with "an eye towards how the movie is supporting or violating" my political beliefs. I just watched it, and I felt that The Dark Knight went out of its way to articulate a political point of view. The film's politics did rub me the wrong way, but I don't think they're something that I simply conjured up without any outside help. I mean, no one seems to be seriously arguing that this is an anti-dubya film.

(And no, I don't imagine Nolan pitched it as "Batman=Dubya". But then, I doubt he had to pitch it at all.)

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 19:59 (fifteen years ago) link

it seems more like an admittance that there are politics to comic book heroes, & that nolan went a bit out of his way to engage with them to make the movie seem more close to the bone to his audience - you really seem stubborn about the idea that the movie justifying (more or less) its heroes actions is in any way equivalent with justifying bush's. it's playing off the national consciousness, & obviously doing it pretty well: it's not justifying wars or wiretapping or anything else, really, except its own main character.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:04 (fifteen years ago) link

this is probably the part where i stress again that that main character is a man who dresses up like a bat

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:06 (fifteen years ago) link

And Aslan is just a really big lion.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:10 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the point is, the movie says that lawbreaking by the powerful is sometimes ok because the people doing it are fundamentally good, use wisdom, and the results are heroic, even if people are concerned about the details. it more or less has to say this, because it's an action movie about a superhero -- it's not just genre but drama itself that militates against obvious policy positions even as it demands "engagement with" hot-button topics of the day.

i think david addington believes that kind of thing about himself, the trouble is, he's not a man who dresses up like a bat, as far as we've been able to find out.

goole, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:17 (fifteen years ago) link

you never know

latebloomer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:19 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it says it is never ok, and those that do so are necessarily excluded from a lawful society because they undermine it. Batman's methods are not sustainable because he does not hold himself to any law.the aporia is common:law as such is ultimately sustained and protected by something outside the law.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Or, more pessimistically, that law and justice are illusions we subscribe to without recognizing their contingency.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:27 (fifteen years ago) link

the movie says that lawbreaking by the powerful is sometimes ok because the people doing it are fundamentally good, use wisdom, and the results are heroic, even if people are concerned about the details

i think the movie shows this kind of lawbreaking, speculates it may be heroic, but more than anything says: man, these questions are really troubling and hard to parse.

Batman & friends seem pretty fucking conflicted.

sean gramophone, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:33 (fifteen years ago) link

i've been mulling over a bunch of half-thought-through arguments for years that the essential political disagreements in modernity are between boredeom and excitement, and boredom is always the moral choice but a clear loser in the realm of popular argument. decent transit is godawfully boring, so the excitement of the "open road" gets us what we have today. education is boring as fuck, so let's spice up our solution set with vouchers based on the idea of "competition," that'll light a fire under it!

gaining information and working toward security are intensely boring affairs, too -- putting together an accurate picture of the economic patterns of waziristan and a cop walking the same beat for years are less exciting and infintely more useful than stringing a dude up by his nuts or a SWAT team taking the door of some shithole, but dude that's like homework.

so in the end there are very tight limits to what an action movie or really any drama at all can say about what we should do in the world, because the real status quo and any good change to it are just wholly undramatic.

lol this is what my insomnia is made of

goole, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah. And it's worth agreeing with whoever said above that this is all part of the Batman mythos. Were this Superman we were talking about the context would be way different. Now there's a hero for Bush's self conception!

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Speaking of the mythology...

Batman's methods are not sustainable because he does not hold himself to any law.
That's always been the Batman's situation: his greatest strength and his curse. He protects society by doing what the socially-bound cannot or will not, and in doing so accepts his own exclusion from society. His outcast "darkness" then becomes a badge not only of vigilante justice, but of the price he secretly and willingly pays in the name of the greater good. This is intrinsic to the character, and always has been. The Batman is a very dark and compromised hero, but he's a hero nonetheless -- one ideally suited to dark and compromised situations.

Connecting this basic character material to real-world situations that seem to echo the Bush administration is where things get tricky. And I do not for a second accept that the film condemns the Batman's tactics and/or overall course of action.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

See I was thinking that if bush = Batman then we should chase bush out of office!

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:41 (fifteen years ago) link

so in the end there are very tight limits to what an action movie or really any drama at all can say about what we should do in the world, because the real status quo and any good change to it are just wholly undramatic.

-- goole

OTM. But that's why, in drawing parallels between the imaginary world in which they operate and the real world in which they're presented, action movies have to be somewhat careful, lest they send messages they don't intend.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Connecting this basic character material to real-world situations that seem to echo the Bush administration is where things get tricky. And I do not for a second accept that the film condemns the Batman's tactics and/or overall course of action.

-- contenderizer

what effort really has to be made to connect them? the connections are going to be there anyway - gotham is already giving batman way more power than any one man should have, right? why is it ok for him to have that power?

the movie bothers to ask that question, it answers as it should, (BECAUSE HES A FUCKING SUPERHERO) & now its catching flack from you for it!

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:49 (fifteen years ago) link

also, remember the way the wannabe non-batman-batman vigilantes were treated by this movie? (not well)

deeznuts, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 20:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think that Batman is a natural, obvious parallel to the Bush admin. The metaphor I'm talking about isn't built into the character's basic mythology. Filmmakers had to drag in terrorism, torture, domestic surveillance and the nobility of lying to create the subtext.

gotham is already giving batman way more power than any one man should have, right? why is it ok for him to have that power?
That's a different discussion. It's an interesting point, but it's not what I've been talking about here, and I don't think it's one of the film's primary themes. Batman isn't really given any power at all -- he simply does what he wants, operating outside the law. Gordon and the citizens of the city may condone or even celebrate this, but Batman is more free than he is powerful.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 21:07 (fifteen years ago) link

The metaphor I'm talking about isn't built into the character's basic mythology. Filmmakers had to drag in terrorism, torture, domestic surveillance and the nobility of lying to create the subtext.

To the extent that it matters, the filmmakers don't have to go far -- all of that stuff exists in Batman's history in the comics to some degree or another. Most recently, he created a satellite surveillance system called Brother Eye to keep track of all other powered beings on Earth, because he stopped trusting them after discovering that the JLA had previously subjected him to a mindwipe. Unfortunately, Brother Eye was compromised by his enemies, causing many deaths.

He's also brushed up against torture many, many times in recent years, going so far as to put a loaded gun to a criminal's head with his finger on the trigger, only to be stopped by Wonder Woman from going through with it.

Pancakes Hackman, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 23:10 (fifteen years ago) link

For what it's worth a lot of forgettable dialogue in the beginning addresses these issues.

And authoritarianism is brought up when Rachel mentions Caesar.

ryan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 23:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Pancakes: Yeah, I know that Batman has dealt with all/most of these issues before -- their presence in this context doesn't start with the film. But in bringing up Batman's "mythos", I was focusing more on the basic essence of the character than all the permutations he's been run through in this or that DC title (his history). But I can't deny that a taste for brutality and for snooping where the law might not allow are a big part of what distinguishes the Batman from most other DCU superheroes. Even the characterization of the Joker -- as the embodiment of a malignant nihilism that naturally opposes civilization-enabling order and faith -- has roots in the comics. Still, I think it would be easy to make a Batman film that doesn't function as a direct apologia (in roxy's words) for Bush/Cheney war-on-terror policies. And I'm not convinced that it's mere coincidence that The Dark Knight fills this role so well.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 23:56 (fifteen years ago) link

just for the sake of clarity: you do think that Nolan intended the film as an apologia for Bush?

Interesting things I noticed this time through:

-vigilante to Batman: "what's the difference between you and me?"
-the aforementioned bit about Caesar suggesting that Nolan knows full well that terrorism is often used as an excuse for authoritarianism, and that even good intentions can have that effect.
-that batman doesnt seem to recognize that the joker is the logical consequence of his own actions. stepping outside the law to protect it forces one to confront the utter chaos and nihilism that the law normally shields us from. it's strongly suggested in the film that batman "makes" the joker appear.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 00:10 (fifteen years ago) link

in other words, the joker is like what happens when batman upsets the natural order of cops vs criminals...and like some metaphysical entity made flesh he has to face the nihilism that his own vigilanteism implies.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 00:12 (fifteen years ago) link

just for the sake of clarity: you do think that Nolan intended the film as an apologia for Bush?
I don't know. I do think that the strong parallels between Batman actions and the Bush admin's war on terror aren't entirely accidental. But I'm not sure what Nolan & Co. intended, or that I'm reading the film correctly.

...batman doesnt seem to recognize that the joker is the logical consequence of his own actions. stepping outside the law to protect it forces one to confront the utter chaos and nihilism that the law normally shields us from. it's strongly suggested in the film that batman "makes" the joker appear.
OTM. It's only in this sense that the film might seem to find fault with the Batman's course of action. And, of course, this too works as part of the metaphor, echoing the familiar assertions that the United States sponsored Al-Qaeda's rise to power and perhaps even invited the 9/11 attacks.

While it's fair to say that Batman similarly "made the Joker appear", it isn't because he did anything wrong. He simply refused to accept the corrupt compromise between crime and justice that allowed the city to function smoothly. His only fault is the hubris that led him to think he might make Gotham/the world a better place. And while the film does suggest that we unbalance the status quo at our peril, it also argues that once the forces of chaos have been unleashed, we have no choice but to fight them on their own terms.

the joker is like what happens when batman upsets the natural order of cops vs criminals...and like some metaphysical entity made flesh he has to face the nihilism that his own vigilanteism implies.
This is a strong counter-argument to what I've been saying, and I can't deny that it's also present in the film.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 00:36 (fifteen years ago) link

And on another note Gary Oldman is sooo good in this.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 02:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Hokay, on second thought, I don’t believe that the film functions as the story of the consequences of lawless vigilantism. The Joker is created/necessitated not by Batman’s vigilante tactics, but rather by Gordon & Dent’s legitimate police actions: raiding crooked banks, invoking RICOH, etc. Therefore, The Dark Knight doesn’t show us the chaos that results when good men operate outside the bounds of the law, but rather the chaos that results when good men dare to stand against evil. And it suggests that a particularly cruel and lawless form of heroism may be the only recourse in such dire situations, even though polite society later repudiates the dirty work that saved the day. Again, the Bush apologetics.

Plus, yeah, Gary Oldman. And Ledger in a wig.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 02:43 (fifteen years ago) link

I totally disagree!

But we can all agree on oldman thankfully.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 02:47 (fifteen years ago) link

i think this movie was bout eating crayons

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 02:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman : cops :: joker : criminals

Ok we've argued in circles so ill let it rest!

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 02:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Nolan's an English Literature graduate = he knows about Barthes = he's not going to be offended by how people read this movie, or have a 'proper' way to read this movie that he adheres to even, probably, beyond "It's a morally-conflicted Batman film".

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 07:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Which also means the Batman = Bush analogy is not wrong; but also not right either. It's just a possibility; millions of subtly (and radically) different interpretations of this movie exist. I note that Nolan doesn't really do much in the way of interviews about his films that go beyond "we dreamt the Batpod up in my garage and asked the engineers to make it and they said 'unpossible' but we asked again and they did it lol".

Compare Batman to the protagonist in Memento.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 07:05 (fifteen years ago) link

The Joker is created/necessitated not by Batman’s vigilante tactics, but rather by Gordon & Dent’s legitimate police actions: raiding crooked banks, invoking RICOH, etc.

Yes, but it was only Batman's actions in the first film, and his continuing action at the beginning of this one, that made it possible for Gordon and the MCU to take on the Mob and the crooks in the first place. And it was Batman who provided the irradiated bills and the means of tracking them, since Gordon seemed to be running the whole op on the down-low, outside the eyes of the commissioner and the mayor.

I suspect this all actually makes your reading stronger, not weaker.

Pancakes Hackman, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 12:23 (fifteen years ago) link

Perhaps I'm remembering wrong, but in the Tim Burton Batman movies, didn't Batman not have as many qualms about killing people?

I seem to remember him setting a few criminals on fire with his Batmobile in Batman REturns

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 12:27 (fifteen years ago) link

(note: I know these are not part of the same storyline, just asking!)

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 12:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, he also blew up the Joker's Smilex factory in the first one with absolutely no warning to anyone who might be inside. Frankly, his "no killing" rule has always kinda meant "no just outright shooting guys." Crippling and maiming, or putting them in the ICU, is perfectly OK.

Pancakes Hackman, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 12:29 (fifteen years ago) link

those were the "can the end justify the means" portion of Nolan's movies, I s'pose. pretty sure IRL, law enforcement would have let Batman let the Joker fall...Batman must have one guilty conscience about things.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 12:31 (fifteen years ago) link

shouldn't have been a 12A

conrad, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman isn't really given any power at all -- he simply does what he wants, operating outside the law. Gordon and the citizens of the city may condone or even celebrate this, but Batman is more free than he is powerful.

This is a big pile of horseshit. Batman is insanely wealthy, has an advanced technology company at his disposal, and has the support of the police force up until the end of the movie, where even still the head of the police force is covertly still supporting him. I defy you to name a more powerful individual in Gotham.

The point where the Bush analogy falls over is where Batman spends most of the movie looking for a way to stop his slide into authoritarianism via the proxy that is Harvey Dent; where is the analogue for Bushco? Who are they holding up as the legitimate power who should be handling these problems "the right way" (aka "the legal way" or, to be more blunt, "the liberal way")? Batman thinks due process can take over for him with a person like Harvey Dent spearheading the charge and spends most of the movie trying to make this transition happen; everything he does isn't so much in the name of stomping out The Joker as much as it is in eliminating his position and elevating Harvey Dent. How is that analogous to Bushco?

Similar actions can be used to drive vastly different agendas, particularly when comparing reality to fiction.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link

For what it's worth, I didn't watch with "an eye towards how the movie is supporting or violating" my political beliefs. I just watched it, and I felt that The Dark Knight went out of its way to articulate a political point of view. The film's politics did rub me the wrong way, but I don't think they're something that I simply conjured up without any outside help. I mean, no one seems to be seriously arguing that this is an anti-dubya film.

tdk definitely articulates political points of view, but to what end? I see the film as more conflicted than you do. it's not an anti-dubya film, but calling it pro-dubya seems like a gross misreading. should the us president be viewed as a shadowy vigilante? it that positive?

there are a number of places where the film diverges from a one-sided reading. for instance, if it were a wholesale endorsement of bush admin tactics then batman would've beaten the joker to a pulp, extracted the info he needed, and saved the day - yay, torture vindication. instead, he is fed false information which sends everything spiraling further out of control - he loses the most important person to him, dent is destroyed, and the joker is set free to cause more havoc and destruction.

I understand the argument that merely by conflating bush/batman a situation is created that implicitly confers hero status upon bush. but there's no triumph or glory in this story. there's only a bitter, pyrrhic victory. if you see tdk as a celebration of bush policy then your standards for celebration must be pretty freakin' low.

I guess you can object to the film as a wish-fulfillment scenario for persecuted bush supporters, but I don't reject the film on those grounds anymore than I would reject a clockwork orange for inspiring gang hooliganism.

Edward III, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 16:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Right. I agree with all that.

And that batman's final gesture can be seen as analogous to either dostoevsky's grand inquisitor or plato's "noble lie" in the republic I find very interesting! At first I found it to be authoritarian but it could also be Batman rejecting it.

What's really cool about is that is that it's clearly Batman trying to find some way to handle what he's created, and the inadverdent mess he's created with his hubris.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

And it's really some kind of scandal that it's not R rated.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:07 (fifteen years ago) link

its funny; dent spends the whole movie wishing he was batman; batman spends the whole movie wishing he was dent--the only person happy with who he is is the joker

max, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't get the impression the Joker was a really personally fulfilled dude. I think upthread was more accurate in saying he hates everything, just himself a little less than the rest of it.

Oilyrags, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:12 (fifteen years ago) link

i just mean that hes not constantly trying to be something or someone else

max, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:13 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean the way i imagine it, until batman joker didnt really have any idea who he was--he has so many different stories about his scars--but then he finds this guy who gives him a semi-stationary place, a better-defined identity. frankly the joker is the only person in the movie who seems happy!!

batman, meanwhile, sees in dent everything he wishes he was--and is crushed at the end of the movie when he realizes that his counterpart isnt harvey dent (i.e. the duality isnt white knight/dark knight but at least theyre both knights), its the joker--good crazy and bad crazy, but theyre both crazy.

max, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link

The point where the Bush analogy falls over is where Batman spends most of the movie looking for a way to stop his slide into authoritarianism via the proxy that is Harvey Dent

Don't you think the film undermines this, tho? What with Rachel's letter (you can never stop being Batman) and Dent's eventual transformation into Two-Face? Even if Batman initially wants to place Dent as the true hero (and even tho he does so under false pretenses in the film ending) too many things seem to subvert that as to make it less than self-evident that this is Nolan's "message."

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link

crushed at the end of the movie when he realizes that his counterpart isnt harvey dent (i.e. the duality isnt white knight/dark knight but at least theyre both knights), its the joker--good crazy and bad crazy, but theyre both crazy.

That's really interesting. Because Dent also ends up as his duality counterpart (also bad crazy). Do you think that Batman's attempts to make Dent into his counterpart force him into this actual duality?

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:18 (fifteen years ago) link

i dont know--i havent thought that far--but if youre thinking 'duality' dent turning into two-face is obviously important

max, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Right. I just meant, Batman tries to force Dent into being his counterpart (Caped Vigilante V Public Hero), but arguably, by forcing Dent into being the Public Hero, he sets him up for the Joker's response (which is very much a Chigurah'esque force of nature) which turns him into Batman's actual counterpart... another crazy person.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Dent does "pretend" to be Batman...

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:24 (fifteen years ago) link

from an interview with nolan:

Newsweek: You also seem to be commenting on the impossibility of heroism in a brutal world, because any hero will inevitably be faced with unthinkable choices, and simply by choosing, the hero becomes a monster to many.

Nolan: The Joker gets pleasure from taking somebody's rule set — their ethics, their morals — and turning them against each other. Paradox is the way you do that. Giving people impossible choices. What Batman is doing is heroic, but it can be seen in another way: as vigilantism, as a dark force outside the law. That's a very, very dangerous road to go down. He's always riding a knife edge in moral terms.

Newsweek: The film implies that Gotham's latest wave of psychos exist partly because of Batman, not in spite of him. His presence has unintended consequences in the same way that the U.S. presence in Iraq has consequences.

Nolan: At the end of the first film we introduced the idea of escalation. Batman creates this extreme response to crime in Gotham—putting on a mask and jumping off rooftops. Well, what's that going to inspire from the criminals he's fighting? Batman has changed the world, but not all for the better. The use of force against an enemy is a tricky and fascinating thing to have in a story. And the film tries to make the point that everybody loses in these situations.

Edward III, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:32 (fifteen years ago) link

ah, that's nice to have!

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:36 (fifteen years ago) link

He was also on Radio 4's Film Programme last week, talking about how he saw the brutal interrogation scene as illustrating the futility of torture. Granted, this sets up terrorist suspects as being as purely evil as the Joker.

Alba, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:41 (fifteen years ago) link

# Batman carries on beginning in ... The Dark Knight [Started by Alba (Alba), last updated 2 minutes ago] 234 new answers
# HIV/AIDS cure??!!??!? [Started by Oilyrags, last updated 3 minutes ago] 34 new answers

Scanning over thread titles, I sort of read this as "Batman cures HIV/AIDS," and for a second I was way more interested in seeing this movie

nabisco, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Anyway, the only site that really matters on the movie:

http://www.moviemistakes.com/film6359

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 17:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman is insanely wealthy, has an advanced technology company at his disposal, and has the support of the police force up until the end of the movie, where even still the head of the police force is covertly still supporting him. I defy you to name a more powerful individual in Gotham.

-- HI DERE

I knew I'd have to clarify that when I posted it. I mean that Batman is a representation of the hero as outsider. Batman operates not as a member of society (that's Bruce Wayne's job), but as a rogue agent. That's the essence of the character. He is individually powerful (wealthy, strong, smart), but he can't make policy or shape the external world to his ends. He doesn't command armies, and his wealth is something of an illusion, in that, narratively, it only exists in order to provide him with gadgets and time. I'm splitting hairs here, but I see Batman as a fantasy of individual more than worldly power -- still, I'll grant that he's both.

The point where the Bush analogy falls over is where Batman spends most of the movie looking for a way to stop his slide into authoritarianism via the proxy that is Harvey Dent; where is the analogue for Bushco?

-- HI DERE

There is no clear analogue there. I'm not saying that the movie is nothing but a metaphor for Bush's war on terror, just that it's in there somewhere. Dent business doesn't really fit. (Rather, I could try to make it fit, and maybe even succeed, but I don't see the need.)

understand the argument that merely by conflating bush/batman a situation is created that implicitly confers hero status upon bush. but there's no triumph or glory in this story. there's only a bitter, pyrrhic victory. if you see tdk as a celebration of bush policy then your standards for celebration must be pretty freakin' low.

-- Edward III

If I used the world "celebration", I regret it (roxy's "apologia" is much more apt). The film doesn't celebrate its hero -- and if Batman does stand for Bush, it doesn't celebrate him, either. But it does, as you suggest, throw the hero's mantle over Batman/Bush. His victory may be "bitter, pyrrhic", but it is victory nonetheless -- the result of a good man trying his damndest to make the best of a very bad situation.

And it's really some kind of scandal that it's not R rated.

-- ryan

OTM. There were moments where I was actually troubled by the brutality on screen (e.g., Dent with a gun to the head of Gordon's son), and I think that had as much to do with the fact that I was watching a "family film" than the actual content.

Edward: Nolan quote is fascinating and resolves some of my intent-related questions. I can see as how this story may be intended, to some degree, to subvert the heroism of Batman and his methods -- but I don't think it effectively does this. He remains the hero, and while we might quibble with his choices, the film retains respect both for his basic mission and for his personal integrity. That respect seems appropriate to me in a Batman film, even essential, but it does raise some difficult issues when actual, real-world foreign policy issues are evoked, even metaphorically.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:00 (fifteen years ago) link

in tone it's r-rated but there's very little actual direct shots of gore. there's also no sex/nudity or extensive language, and we all know that's what really gets the mpaa's panties in a bunch.

latebloomer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:08 (fifteen years ago) link

He remains the hero, and while we might quibble with his choices, the film retains respect both for his basic mission and for his personal integrity.

You know, I wonder about that, actually. I find the take of the film to be less about retaining respect and more being observational.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:10 (fifteen years ago) link

That's really interesting. Because Dent also ends up as his duality counterpart (also bad crazy). Do you think that Batman's attempts to make Dent into his counterpart force him into this actual duality?

-- Mordy, Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:18 PM

Dent does "pretend" to be Batman...

-- ryan, Wednesday, July 30, 2008 1:24 PM

Yeah, I was just going to say, Dent does pretty OK for himself, aside from being briefly endangered by the Joker at Bruce Wayne's fundraiser, up until he stands up at the press conference and says "I'm the Batman." That's the real beginning of his troubles.

Pancakes Hackman, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:16 (fifteen years ago) link

I find the take of the film to be less about retaining respect and more being observational.
That's an interesting point, and I really do need to see it again. I felt that the film was 100% on Batman's side, emotionally if not intellectually, but maybe I was projecting/assuming that?

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:21 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't want to overstate the case -- clearly there's a sense of respect at play, but at the same time what I think is interesting about how the film plays out on that front is that while Batman's 'rule' is paramount, everything below that rule is up for grabs, and that the film doesn't end on a note of absolute, easy to accept resolution on that point.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:28 (fifteen years ago) link

I said it way upthread, but I don't TDK is a Bush apologia. I do very much think it can be read as an unusually sympathetic critique.

Its resonance re:post-9/11 government overreach is rooted more in sadness and understanding than anger, IMO

Hubie Brown, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:31 (fifteen years ago) link

The point where the Bush analogy falls over is where Batman spends most of the movie looking for a way to stop his slide into authoritarianism via the proxy that is Harvey Dent; where is the analogue for Bushco? Who are they holding up as the legitimate power who should be handling these problems "the right way" (aka "the legal way" or, to be more blunt, "the liberal way")? Batman thinks due process can take over for him with a person like Harvey Dent spearheading the charge and spends most of the movie trying to make this transition happen; everything he does isn't so much in the name of stomping out The Joker as much as it is in eliminating his position and elevating Harvey Dent. How is that analogous to Bushco?

to play devil's advocate here, I'd say the analogy is like the old joke: what is a conservative? a liberal who's been mugged.

batman's a believer in dent's promise, but he comes to realize that dent's methods are not up to the task. only batman's ability to operate outside the system can end the joker's reign of terror. this echoes the bush attitude that human rights are great, but they should be discarded when the chips are down.

Edward III, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:32 (fifteen years ago) link

I do very much think it (TDK) can be read as an unusually sympathetic critique. Its resonance re: post-9/11 government overreach is rooted more in sadness and understanding than anger...
OTM. This is one of the best things anyone's said so far on this subject.

Re: Edward -- I did kinda see Dent as representing the promise of liberal/humanitarian values. He looks good on paper, but is hollow underneath and brings no useful tools to the table. The people will rally behind him because he promises something better, but behind the scenes, it's up to dirty men to do the dirty work.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:51 (fifteen years ago) link

well yeah, i think these situations have a logic and momentum of their own...hence Nolan's idea of "escalation"...or an observational film about the old security/freedom conundrum and people grappling with that. Doesn't mean it supports one side or the other politically, but it does dramatize the conflict, which is real and a part of all of our lives.

I'd say Gordon, more than Batman, is the character that were supposed to identify with most. Hence the humanity of Oldman's performance is so important.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 18:59 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean, once the joker appears, it's not as if Batman can simply go away and not clean up the mess he made....there is something tragic and inevitable about the arc of the film. but because the film sees the situation as having this tragic inevitability doesn't make it pro-Bush, or Republican. It MIGHT make it conservative in the classic tragic sense though. but then a LOT of art is like that. In fact I'M like that in my heart, but i still vote liberal.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:04 (fifteen years ago) link

there is an important line that hasnt been mentioned. When Batman is confronted with the deaths the joker is causing and asks Alfred "What am I to do?"

Alfred says "endure, take it"--and while he says this to convince Batman not to turn himself in, I think in some ways it can be seen as the liberal heart of the film...which is itself a tragic response to suffering and terror that differs greatly from the presumed conservative "escalation."

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:09 (fifteen years ago) link

in fact, if there is a non-tragic response to implacable evil, i'd love to hear it.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:12 (fifteen years ago) link

re: alfred's advice: could also be read as a "stay the course" mentality, too

Edward III, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:13 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah that is probably the right interpretation. the line did kinda stick out for me though.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:15 (fifteen years ago) link

I'd say Gordon, more than Batman, is the character that were supposed to identify with most. Hence the humanity of Oldman's performance is so important.

Absolutely. More than anyone he is the audience substitute. (And notably, of all the major characters, he is the only one with a family -- everyone else might as well be orphaned and isolated like Wayne.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Rachel is almost as much an audience substitute as Gordon. I'm not sure, but I think she even gets more screen time.

...there is something tragic and inevitable about the arc of the film. but because the film sees the situation as having this tragic inevitability doesn't make it pro-Bush, or Republican.
Again, though: there are several points at which the film seems to draw parallels between the Batman and Bushco, and between the Joker and terrorism. This doesn't necessarily make it pro-Bush, but I'd argue that, if the analogy holds up, it's more sympathetic than condemnatory. It's a tragic story, and while Bats has his flaws, he's still our (dark, conflicted) hero protagonist.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:19 (fifteen years ago) link

kind of changing the subject here, but what about the lies at the end of the movie? the classic take on the hero is that he's always honest - he won't win by being deceitful, because that what's separates him from the bad guys.

but at the end of tdk, the remaining good guys are all caught in some kind of falsehood. batman/gordon are lying about dent, alfred's deceived batman by burning rachel's letter, even fox could be said to be compromised by helping batman "just this once" against his princples. everyone's personal integrity (including batman's) is in tatters.

Edward III, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:23 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah absolutely. i really hope nolan makes a trilogy and that this the "dark" middle part...wondering where this arc is going...seems like a very pessimistic place for it to end. then again, i've interpreted nolan's other films as having pessimistic endings. the prestige also has the theme of the illusions we keep for our own good.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:26 (fifteen years ago) link

hell, doesn't memento end in a similar fashion? i can hardly remember.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:38 (fifteen years ago) link

And thus you, Ryan, become part of that very film.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:41 (fifteen years ago) link

now where were we

latebloomer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:47 (fifteen years ago) link

This doesn't necessarily make it pro-Bush, but I'd argue that, if the analogy holds up, it's more sympathetic than condemnatory. It's a tragic story, and while Bats has his flaws, he's still our (dark, conflicted) hero protagonist.

or maybe the film implies we need a different kind of hero? or that our heroes - whether they are bush or batman - are not equipped to handle the challenges before them? the general tone of hopelessness throughout the film seeems to lend it to such conclusions.

Edward III, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that kind of summary conclusion will have to wait until after we see where he goes with the third one (presuming there is a third one and that Nolan directs it).

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:57 (fifteen years ago) link

but at the end of tdk, the remaining good guys are all caught in some kind of falsehood. batman/gordon are lying about dent, alfred's deceived batman by burning rachel's letter, even fox could be said to be compromised by helping batman "just this once" against his princples. everyone's personal integrity (including batman's) is in tatters.

as far as i can remember the only honest hero in the whole movie is tiny lister jr.

max, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 19:59 (fifteen years ago) link

x-post -- Yeah, that third film idea is not yet set in stone, though of course the sheer success of the film makes it clear there will be one. If Nolan does it and he wants to push the ideas he's already put in place even further, that could be astonishing.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:00 (fifteen years ago) link

batman's a believer in dent's promise, but he comes to realize that dent's methods are not up to the task. only batman's ability to operate outside the system can end the joker's reign of terror. this echoes the bush attitude that human rights are great, but they should be discarded when the chips are down.

I might buy this line of rhetoric if the film supported it in the slightest. Batman bends over backwards to make Dent the hero throughout the movie; if he is repudiating anything, it is himself. Everything he does is in service of making himself irrelevant; that doesn't jibe at all with the idea that Batman doesn't think Dent's methodology is not worth pursuing. In fact, taking the rap for Dent's freakout is an explicit renunciation of Batman's methodology; he turns himself into a criminal in order to protect the path he sees as the way the city should go forward. (Whether anyone buys it is a whole separate issue.)

HI DERE, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:03 (fifteen years ago) link

A slightly different variation on the Bush:Batman question. If Bush is Batman, who is the Joker? Asking within the analogy, it's clear that the Joker has to be your generic Islamic terrorist, which makes the Batman/Joker dichotomy problematic. I don't think Bush poses himself as the same as Osama Bin Ladin, just for good instead of evil. I think the US government likes to pose themselves as legitimacy V. illegitimacy. And no matter how you determine Batman's moral station in the flick, he's certainly illegitimate.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:09 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah, I don't really buy my own argument here, since batman never explicitly repudiates dent's approach at any point.

however, there is the gap between what comes out of batman's mouth and what he actually does, which is basically motherfuck a bill of rights.

xpost to dan

Edward III, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:13 (fifteen years ago) link

which is basically motherfuck a bill of rights.

haha!

ryan, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:14 (fifteen years ago) link

And no matter how you determine Batman's moral station in the flick, he's certainly illegitimate.

-- Mordy

Why would you say this, and why should we agree? As I see it, Batman is driven throughout the film by a coherent, legitimate moral vision. That vision is compromised by the extremity of the situations that the Joker and Dent force him into (and perhaps even more so by his self-imposed "outlaw crimefighter" role), but Batman never abandons his core principles, however hazy and internally contradictory they might be.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:32 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't mean legitimacy of principle. I meant actual legitimacy. As has been restated on this thread numerous times, he exists outside the law. This is definitionally illegitimate.

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

I think you guys saw a different Batman movie than me. In the one I saw shit blew up and it was fun.

BLACK BEYONCE, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:37 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost: Gotcha. Morally uncompromised, legally illegitimate.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

In the one I saw shit blew up and it was fun.

Oh right, this one:

http://thecarter.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/batman_und_robin_usa_1997_b01.jpg

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:39 (fifteen years ago) link

BB, were you using the bathroom whenever the film brought up nuance outside the scope of blowing things up?

Mordy, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:40 (fifteen years ago) link

I think you guys saw a different Batman movie than me. In the one I saw shit blew up and it was fun.

that's okay you can talk about that one here too

Edward III, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:51 (fifteen years ago) link

OK cool

BLACK BEYONCE, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 21:07 (fifteen years ago) link

goddamnit we need a spoiler tag so i don't have to spend 45 minutes reading the thread after i finally getting around to seeing the movie that's already been out for over a week in the states.

anyway all i really want to know is this: who of you voted to blow up the other boat? eh? c'mon, who's with me?!

ledge, Wednesday, 30 July 2008 23:31 (fifteen years ago) link

The line for the IMAX showing I'm seeing in an hour is crazy. Glad we came here early.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 00:52 (fifteen years ago) link

FWIW, I liked this one much more than Batman Begins.

Eric H., Thursday, 31 July 2008 03:36 (fifteen years ago) link

been out to lunch with this thread for a while, but contenderizer basically otm throughout

roxymuzak, Thursday, 31 July 2008 04:37 (fifteen years ago) link

In the hallway en route to the IMAX screen:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3177/2717851875_2d99abb2ff.jpg

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 05:23 (fifteen years ago) link

Wow and very cool.

Mordy, Thursday, 31 July 2008 05:24 (fifteen years ago) link

There were similar snippets of Joker dialogue on other mirrors but that one caught my eye in particular.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 05:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Look at this idiot

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 08:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Oops

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080729/ap_en_ot/odd_joker_arrested;_ylt=Asg2BvuGUkI7Yk.XtNDX7iNX24cA

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 08:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Isn't that C-Man?

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 31 July 2008 08:51 (fifteen years ago) link

much like Michael Clayton I dislike movies that find it necessary to illustrate moral ambiguity with plot frenetics and excess. Isn't there an entire department of competent DAs that can fill the place of Dent? He certainly wasn't competent in Internal Affairs since poor Gordon still has crooked cops on staff. I can't help but think that any Escobar-era Columbian judge would find the whole lot of them to be, well, pussies.

Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 31 July 2008 08:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Been reading about the skyhook used to get him out of Hong Kong...

"Fulton first used instrumented dummies as he prepared for a live pickup. He next used a pig, as pigs have nervous systems close to humans. Lifted off the ground, the pig began to spin as it flew through the air at 125 mph (200 km/h). It arrived on board undamaged but in a disoriented state. Once it recovered, it attacked the crew."

ledge, Thursday, 31 July 2008 10:37 (fifteen years ago) link

they skipped that part in the movie

latebloomer, Thursday, 31 July 2008 10:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Already have.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v417/albaalba/ilx/n562993899_592918_928.jpg

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 11:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Just saw this last night. i enjoyed it, and ledger and oldman are just as good as everybdy says.

would have agreed with most of what contederizer has said wrt the movie's political sympathies, but then the thought occurred to me that if the film really was bush-sympathetic, then the good guys would just have taken out the joker in the street after the awesome truck stunt, and won.

Batman keeps to his 'rule' and this allows the joker (who doesn't have any such rules) to wreak further havoc, and that seemed to be the dilemma the movie posed- is claiming the moral victory worth the extra damage caused in a situation where the opposition have no rules, no geneva conventions, etc?

on a purely film-fan note, i think it should have ended after rachel's death and harvey's awakening, with the joker in custody. the remaining 40 or so minutes was clumsy, muddled and unneccessary, and was in essence a completely different story and tone to what had gone before, and didn't really work for me.

i really had a problem with the joker managing to rig the only three ferries that were being used to transport people from gotham. hundreds of barrels of gas, and, uh, nobody checked the engine room? and his escape from detention just plain sucked.

darraghmac, Thursday, 31 July 2008 11:30 (fifteen years ago) link

on a purely film-fan note, i think it should have ended after rachel's death and harvey's awakening, with the joker in custody. the remaining 40 or so minutes was clumsy, muddled and unneccessary, and was in essence a completely different story and tone to what had gone before, and didn't really work for me.

I've heard a number of people say this, and I tend to agree. Except it would probably be better ending after the Joker escapes and Caine has a chance to deliver his line about burning down the forest. Not that I think the film would have been quite satisfactory ending anywhere in the existing line, but yeah, with some work.

The Two-Face transformation was unconvincing and rushed, despite some good work with the Joker in the hospital. His disapproval at Lieutenant Gordon not rooting out bent cops didn't seem adequate fuel for his fire, nor their decision to try to save him before Rachel. Talking of which, that Joker's whole "who will you choose to save and who will you condemn to death" bomb canard made no sense. If it had just been one guy (esp. Batman) it would have worked, but they had the whole police department and Batman at their disposal - there was no problem splitting and heading to both locations. Rachel's just seemed too far away, or the police were too slow.

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 12:27 (fifteen years ago) link

Generally, this film was far less tightly focused that Batman Begins. I had nothing to consistently grip on to.

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 12:28 (fifteen years ago) link

i was actually looking through the list of batman villains on wikipedia last night since the topic of a third movie came up....having a hard time imagining almost all of those characters existing in the universe created by nolan.

ryan, Thursday, 31 July 2008 14:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Anyone else notice the resemblance between the spoiler scene where they're trying to prevent a political assassination/Gordon bites itspoiler and the climax of "The Day of the Jackal"?

Cunga, Thursday, 31 July 2008 14:31 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah i was thinking that as i was watching it.

ledge, Thursday, 31 July 2008 14:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Did anyone ever make it through the 90s jackal?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 31 July 2008 14:51 (fifteen years ago) link

i was actually looking through the list of batman villains on wikipedia last night since the topic of a third movie came up....having a hard time imagining almost all of those characters existing in the universe created by nolan.

anarky would fit in brilliantly methinks

mark e, Thursday, 31 July 2008 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link

i was actually looking through the list of batman villains on wikipedia last night since the topic of a third movie came up....having a hard time imagining almost all of those characters existing in the universe created by nolan.

Deadshot would be great. Maybe Bane, if he were done correctly.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 31 July 2008 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, given the care that's gone into these flicks, I can't imagine they're already casting when a script hasn't even been written yet (but IN A SHOCKER it's not like I have any idea how Hollywood works).

The Riddler or Penguin could work well in Nolan's more muted Gothamverse, tho -- it's not like they actually put Two-Face into his half-purple suit after the accident, or gave the Joker a squirting flower. Still hoping for Catwoman, tho, maybe played by Michelle Monaghan or someone equally attractive / demure w/ some chops.

A Bane / Hugo Strange mash-up could work, tho they already went the "crazy scientist" route. I'd hope they don't go the "I WILL BREAK THE BATMAN" route -- I don't want to know what that would sound like.

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm surprised no one's suggested MAN-BAT

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:14 (fifteen years ago) link

this was pretty fantastic - too long. definitely would've been nice if they'd trimmed a bit of the fat.

and now to plow through 300 messages....

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:25 (fifteen years ago) link

> I'm surprised no one's suggested MAN-BAT

No one but me.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:25 (fifteen years ago) link

Ha -- back to the RIF program for me!

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:27 (fifteen years ago) link

if they do make a third movie, omg plz don't do the Riddler.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Maybe it's just me, but I can't see how the Penguin can play in any half-way realistic scenario. Goes for a lot of Bat-villains, which may limit how far this series can go.

Soukesian, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:39 (fifteen years ago) link

I agree. I think they've sort of hit the wall for Batman as social commentary/crime drama with this one. Like I said when I suggested a Man-Bat/Catwoman/Killer Croc/Hugo Strange plot, it would be a massive shift in tone.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Mixed feelings about this, it could've been a fantastic film with a healthy dose of script editing. The Joker was unabashedly terrific, not only in terms of Ledger's performance, but in the whole interpretation of the character, which was one of the best I've seen on either the screen or the page. Bale was solid (slightly silly Batvoice aside), and there was a strong sense of Batman inhabiting a larger mythos throughout. The character's iconic status was payed suitable respect.

There was a sense of the film biting off more than it could chew though. I get the idea that it was supposed to be a sprawling crime thriller as much as a cape movie, but the writing wasn't anywhere near the standard of the best examples of that genre. Also, it was just too talky - lots of instances of momentum being slowed while the characters stopped beating on each other to expound on their philosophical viewpoints. If the writers are doing their jobs, the characters shouldn't have to explain the subtext.

Finally, it could've done without the whole Two Face thing. If it had just set the (potentially very intriguing) character up for next time that would've been fine, but as the meat of his arc was crammed into the last half hour it just came off as rushed, and I for one didn't give much of a shit and just wanted to get back to the Joker. Didn't help that I didn't think Eckhart was particularly good.

Anyway, it was consistently entertaining and it's nice to see a blockbuster trying to deliver more than thrills. It's frustrating that it fell short of the greatness that was in its reach though.

P.S. should've been a 15 - the little kids in the audience were FUCKING TERRIFIED.

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:43 (fifteen years ago) link

x-post -- My friend Tom and I were talking about that on the way back from the IMAX showing (which was indeed all that) -- I can see how they could try it but basically it would have to be in some sort of distressed/warped scenario, if you like, less emphasis on superpowers and more on the idee fixe or the symbolism.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Penguin = squat guy w/ a large nose & a little hitch in his giddy-up! How hard is that?

(xpost)

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:45 (fifteen years ago) link

OK. Tony Soprano in spats. Now, how are they going to fit a gritty, real, Robin into this Bat-verse?

Soukesian, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, exactly - Batman invokes an animal to inspire fear in others and draw power into himself. It's practically a spirit-totem thing.

xp to Ned.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link

kinda agree about the shoehorning of the Two-Face arc into the last third. I had been expecting them to set-up Two-Face for the next movie. But Nolan probably felt that the transformation of Dent from hero to monster was key to the whole thing...

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Now, how are they going to fit a gritty, real, Robin into this Bat-verse?

Hopefully not at all.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Maybe it's just me, but I can't see how the Penguin can play in any half-way realistic scenario. Goes for a lot of Bat-villains, which may limit how far this series can go.

this is definitely OTM - altho I thought Burton did a great job with DeVito in Batman Returns.

and yes plz no Robin

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

I think someone mentioned it before, but maybe they go the precocious-youth-gone-wild route, and make the potential Robin into an unwanted follower / acolyte (like the dudes in the hockey gear in TDK) that Bats decides to either set straight or actually train (for whatever reason --likes the cut of his jib / wants to get some booty)?

And then you cast Shia LeBouef. :p

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link

But Nolan probably felt that the transformation of Dent from hero to monster was key to the whole thing...

He's said that he wanted to make this film stand on its own after thinking about going a more-than-one-movie arc, and I'd say he's aware that it's a bit of a squash. Even so, and especially with my rewatch last night (having that entire closing scene film for IMAX makes it incredibly operatic), there's a power to it that is starting to gel for me -- thinking especially of the utterly grotesque moment when Dent talks about what is fair, barking the line and making his disfigured side of his face seem all that much more monstrously alien.

And then you cast Shia LeBouef. :p

And his specially trained batmonkeys on vines.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Bats decides to either set straight or actually train (for whatever reason --likes the cut of his jib / wants to get some booty)

Might be able to tie it in with his argument about wanting to give up the job and feeling that, post-Rachel/Dent/Joker, there's no way it can be fully given up.

And then there's the booty, yes.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:55 (fifteen years ago) link

With Robin, you could do all that, and even make the gay subtext overt, but the costume everyone recognises is still ridiculous, and he's drawing down the power of . . a seasonal songbird.

Soukesian, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman and Ratman

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Maybe it's just me, but I can't see how the Penguin can play in any half-way realistic scenario. Goes for a lot of Bat-villains, which may limit how far this series can go.

-- Soukesian, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:39 (4 minutes ago) Link

I agree. I think they've sort of hit the wall for Batman as social commentary/crime drama with this one. Like I said when I suggested a Man-Bat/Catwoman/Killer Croc/Hugo Strange plot, it would be a massive shift in tone.

-- Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:41 (2 minutes ago) Link

you realize we're talking about a movie where a billionaire dresses up like a bat and seriously calls himself batman

catwoman would be the logical next step. there's so much sexual tension to be exploited in that pairing.

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link

you realize we're talking about a movie where a billionaire dresses up like a bat and seriously calls himself batman

All part of the joy.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Will Halle get a second chance?

xpost

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Catwoman seems like a logical choice (esp now w/Dawes dead)

but what about BATZARRO lolz

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:00 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm in favour of Catwoman - it would be great if it was a relatively small-scale ninety minuter just focusing on the weird relationship between the two characters.

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe catwoman as fellow vigilante minus the "rules" batman assigns to himself? could work...

ryan, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:02 (fifteen years ago) link

otoh consider the villains they've already run through - Ras Al Ghul and the Scarecrow were not really obvious villain choices for the first one - its possible they could do something interesting with one of the more minor ones without veering into completely unbelievable superpower territory

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Shoot forward in time a few years to make Gordon's kids a little older and go the Batgirl route?

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Definitely out: Clayface, Killer Croc. Most other villains could be reworked without too much difficulty into a pseudo-realistic framework.

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link

clayface is the only monstrous sfx villain i can see working in this - get ron perlman back

and what, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^yeah I can see Clayface working actually and he's one of my favorites but seems kinda like a long-shot

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe catwoman as fellow vigilante minus the "rules" batman assigns to himself? could work...

Before DC fucked it up, they set up Catwoman as the self-proclaimed protector of a slummy section of Gotham, occasionally banging heads with Dick Tracy-ish crime folks, and also engaging in a little theft now & then (for the thrill of it).

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, A Cooke-inspired Catwoman could be really fun, but again it wouldn't fit the whole 'I AM THINKING VERY SERIOUSLY ABOUT POWER AND FEAR' deal that Nolan has set up.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:16 (fifteen years ago) link

was Karl Rove a villain in the comics? What's his origin?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link

A Cooke-inspired Catwoman could be really fun, but again it wouldn't fit the whole 'I AM THINKING VERY SERIOUSLY ABOUT POWER AND FEAR' deal that Nolan has set up.

Seriously? For me, that version of Catwoman & Gotham Central are the closest the funny books have come to the feel & tenor of the Nolan flicks.

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link

that reminds me - the whole subplot about the weaselly guy revealing Batman's identity, that was totally unnecessary. Other unnecessary things that should've been cut:

- super-CSI sequence where Batman contaminates the crime scene to recreate the ballistics from that shell in the wall (what exactly was the point of that anyway?)
- opening bit with the drug deal and the pseudo-Batmen

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

point of ballistics was supposedly to get fingerprints off the shattered bullet, but then if he was leaving fingerprints on bullets why not elsewhere? unless he loaded the gun at home before he put his gloves on (did he even generally wear gloves i can't even remember?!)

supposedly this gave batman a name for the joker (thomas schwinn? schmidt?) but then later gordon (i think) said "we have no idea who this guy is!" so yeah wtf really i dunno.

ledge, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Eh, who says it was the Joker who loaded the gun? (Melvin White was the name of the guy with said apartment.)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:25 (fifteen years ago) link

I guess you're right, David, but "Selina's Big Score" for example works so well because it's really just a Jim Thompson type story. It hardly needs to be in the Batverse at all, that's just a hook for sales, and IMO, it really benefits from not having Wayne show up at all, especially in his longjohns. And if we go that route in the movies we probably end up with Halle Berry again.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:25 (fifteen years ago) link

opening bit with the drug deal and the pseudo-Batmen

Nah, I liked that. You needed a cool but low key action scene to reintroduce Batman, plus it set up the effect Bats was having on the citizens of Gotham. Also, the Scarecrow's cameo was a really nice touch, it added to the sense of these characters inhabiting a living, densely populated universe. You got the impression it wasn't the first time Crane had escaped and been recaptured.

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link

xxp and he was a paranoid schizophrenic the joker bumped into in arkham? ok makes sense.

point of pseudo batmen was just for the "what makes you so different?" ooh psyche line. plus, hey lookit, scarecrow is still around. xp.

ledge, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:27 (fifteen years ago) link

was that really Scarecrow in that opening scene...? I couldn't tell

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:28 (fifteen years ago) link

That was him.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:28 (fifteen years ago) link

hmmm melvin white why does that sound familiar

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, that was him -- takes the mask off and behold, Cilian Murphy.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:29 (fifteen years ago) link

point of ballistics was supposedly to get fingerprints off the shattered bullet, but then if he was leaving fingerprints on bullets why not elsewhere? unless he loaded the gun at home before he put his gloves on (did he even generally wear gloves i can't even remember?!)

It wasn't Joker's fingerprint, it was the fingerprint of the guy whose apartment Joker tied the cops up in and left the gun and the windowshade on a timer set up.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:29 (fifteen years ago) link

ah!

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link

who is btw the same guy that Dent threatens in the street after the mayor shooting - the one with Rachel Dawes on his nametag.

Roz, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:34 (fifteen years ago) link

ah, i wondered where he sprang from. where did he spring from? the joker in police uniform fired the shot, right? then it was all chaos.

ledge, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link

that's what I thought, I just wasn't sure - he looked different (hair shorter? less collagen?) or something

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link

On the 'bits it could've done without' tip - Gordon faking his own death for no particular reason.

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:39 (fifteen years ago) link

And if we go that route in the movies we probably end up with Halle Berry again.

Wasn't the HalleCat based on some off-the-wall Egyptian super-totem bullshit (as opposed to cat burglar w/ pointy mask ears bullshit)? They'd have to leap through some ridiculous hoops to get to that point.

Set up Catwoman as some phianthropic Robin Hood type more interested in fighting social ills than actual crime -- she robs from purportedly sketchy businessfolk / spice dealers to help support her neglected area of the city (anonymousish donations to homeless shelters / health clinics / &c). Batusi comes along for some reason -- catches her mid-burgle the least ridiculous notion I can think of; probably stealing from Wayne Enterprises -- and then Stuff Happens. Raises the sort of ham-fisted ethical dillemas ground down from the 1st movie, adds a boner component, and keeps things relatively grounded. And allows for more heist scenes!

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:40 (fifteen years ago) link

the real unneccessary CGI scene was the 'white-eyed' batman in the building site in the end. didn't work at all, and was completely at odds with the other subplots going on around it.

darraghmac, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:40 (fifteen years ago) link

x-x-post -- Protecting his family, doncha know. (At least that was the reason his character gave.)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:40 (fifteen years ago) link

BTW, Dan Perry might like to know that a GIS of "catwoman" turns up a pic of Halle Berry cupping her breasts.

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:42 (fifteen years ago) link

Hey, I'd watch it! I'm just not sure Nolan would want to make it.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:44 (fifteen years ago) link

can a bunch of dudes talk about catwoman casting without devolving into sleaze?

i'd vote for fairuza balk.

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link

xpost apparently not

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link

lolz @ "boner component"

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Rachel Dawes' twin sister seeking revenge?

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:46 (fifteen years ago) link

i'd vote for fairuza balk

Good call. Maybe Christina Ricci.

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:47 (fifteen years ago) link

On the 'bits it could've done without' tip - Gordon faking his own death for no particular reason.

this did seem sorta pointless (why was concealing his identity as the driver important...?) but otoh I loved the scene where Gordon shows up at his house and his wife slaps him

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:47 (fifteen years ago) link

re: protecting his family, uh why wouldn't his family already be under super high-security protection...?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:48 (fifteen years ago) link

He could've at least got someone he trusted (like, say, Batman) to tell his folks what the score was.

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:51 (fifteen years ago) link

TRUST NO ONE

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually I was trying to figure out who he did tell, if anyone. (I presume that the van detail that day didn't involve them going "Yeah, get that driver in the fetish outfit.")

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 16:53 (fifteen years ago) link

one problem with catwoman - has christian bale ever demonstrated any sexual chemistry with a woman?

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Does Jared Leto count?

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

he had a tender physical interaction with his mom

and what, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

oh yeah what was that bullshit with the "i need an alibi, i'll just go yacthing with the entire russian ballet"?

ledge, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

ahh that was funny.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm kinda stuck on the fairuza concept now and would be disappointed if it were anybody else. let the write-in campaign begin.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/156/353415499_de233a5d4c.jpg?v=0

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:03 (fifteen years ago) link

she should play harley quinn

and what, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:06 (fifteen years ago) link

eh but harley requires the Joker

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:09 (fifteen years ago) link

or they could just bypass all that and go straight to the poison ivy subplot. who of course would be played by

http://www.carrollsweb.com/rockndog/ivy.jpg

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I hope christopher nolan is reading this thread

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:13 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^^PLZ TO MAKE HAPPEN

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:24 (fifteen years ago) link

I would also like to say that I appreciate that Nolan does not put any shitty rock music in his superhero movies

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:27 (fifteen years ago) link

The score was alright too, not too schmaltzy or manipulative - it just got you pumped for the action.

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 17:59 (fifteen years ago) link

I would also like to say that I appreciate that Nolan does not put any shitty rock music in his superhero movies

Cosign on this and then some.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Are they not allowed to invent their own villain for the third film?

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:09 (fifteen years ago) link

wtf didn't we already see a leak that it's going to be penguin and riddler?

goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:10 (fifteen years ago) link

that was just a source-less blog post

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:10 (fifteen years ago) link

I would LOVE it if they invented a villain from scratch.

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:11 (fifteen years ago) link

ok, speculate away then

goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:12 (fifteen years ago) link

The Blogger

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Old Media

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Supercuts

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Mr Tickle

ledge, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:19 (fifteen years ago) link

The Thugless Void

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Coldplay

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Mr Gathering Threat

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:20 (fifteen years ago) link

3G

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Lord Custos

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Sandy Vadge

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:23 (fifteen years ago) link

Brangelina

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:24 (fifteen years ago) link

The Asshat

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:26 (fifteen years ago) link

Butthurt

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:27 (fifteen years ago) link

http://files.dmusic.com/music/h/a/halfdeaf/soooooo.jpg

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Mr Steez

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Obama Bin Laden

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:34 (fifteen years ago) link

Cap'n Save-A-Ho

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Fannypack

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Obama Bin Laden

fucking beat me to it arrrgghhh

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Cap'n Save-A-Ho

haha would watch

my wife wanted to know why there weren't any rappers in this movie ("where's Ice-T?" she asked)

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:36 (fifteen years ago) link

aka thugless void syndrome

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:37 (fifteen years ago) link

Talking of the thugs, what became of Mafia Maroni's little visit to the hospital, where he said "This is too much, I'll tell you where the Joker is this afternoon". I can't recall that leading to anything.

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Gordon was marshalling the police to raid the boat he was on with all the money but then the hospital bombing threat took a little precedence.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:40 (fifteen years ago) link

the cops were all on their way to where Joker was burning the money, then the hospital threat thing went down...? But yeah that transition didn't make a lot of sense

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Thanks. One other thing I didn't get was the whole ballistics/shattered bullet thing. What was he actually doing with all those test shots into walls back at his lair? He seemed to be matching the results against the real wall in a plastic bag.

The only thing I can think is that he needed to work out what kind of bullet was fired because it would help him fit together the jigsaw of the shattered one to get fingerprints, but that seems rather tenuous and implausible. Was that it?

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:45 (fifteen years ago) link

I just laughed through that whole sequence - total CSI Jerry Bruckheimer nonsense

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:47 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm already waiting for an extended DVD, so many of the plot shifts were ruthlessly pared down (last few posts, eg). plus, like i said a billion posts ago, what was all the scarecrow drug dealer business at the beginning? that's like a whole other movie right there

goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:47 (fifteen years ago) link

bullet/fingerprint analysis

will, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, the dealers seemed to be pissed off with the Scarecrow ("If you don't like my wares then go elsewhere") but I didn't catch why.

Also, was it supposed to be Bruce alone that reprogrammed the city's mobile phones to be sonar devices, or does he have unseen helpers?

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:50 (fifteen years ago) link

all he'd need is one lonely network admin

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:51 (fifteen years ago) link

what was the deal w/ the scarecrow scene? i figured it somehow tied into the first one which ive pretty much totally forgotten

deeznuts, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:52 (fifteen years ago) link

IOW, this: total CSI Jerry Bruckheimer nonsense

xxp

will, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Thanks for that link, will. That puzzle they outline at the end about how the Joker would set up the trap at Melvin White's apartment seems like no puzzle to me. As they finally suggest, I don't think it was supposed to be a trap.

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:53 (fifteen years ago) link

it is implied in just a few lines of dialogue that the (now insane, escaped) scarecrow has cornered the entire gotham drug supply (lol marlo stanfield) and has spiked it with something that fries people's brains and the rest of the mobs are pissed. that's a huge deal to toss away in a little action prologue!

goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, the dealers seemed to be pissed off with the Scarecrow ("If you don't like my wares then go elsewhere") but I didn't catch why.

It's cos his stuff was giving everyone horrendously bad trips.

xpost

chap, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:55 (fifteen years ago) link

that's a huge deal to toss away in a little action prologue

Yeah, it must have gone further in deleted scenes I guess.

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Great idea - this movie really needs to be longer.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 18:59 (fifteen years ago) link

It should have been a 10-part miniseries really.

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:03 (fifteen years ago) link

The Dark Knight Revisited

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:04 (fifteen years ago) link

batman alexanderplatz

Edward III, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Great idea - this movie really needs to be longer.

-- Oilyrags, Thursday, July 31, 2008 1:59 PM (10 minutes ago)

a long ass dvd is no problem, let's hav it!

goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:11 (fifteen years ago) link

e

goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:11 (fifteen years ago) link

I think I'm going to watch Batman Begins again now.

Alba, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:11 (fifteen years ago) link

A few hours late but that sourceless blog post was written by a former editor of DC and a current writer for Marvel. So... it has some validity.

Mordy, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:58 (fifteen years ago) link

How does having comic-book-industry cred give her validity in spreading Hollywood rumors?

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Or something like that.

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:02 (fifteen years ago) link

i heard there was a cut about 30 minutes longer that existed a few weeks ago.

ryan, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:30 (fifteen years ago) link

months ago, that is...oof.

ryan, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:30 (fifteen years ago) link

David, presumably DC Comics, which is owned by Warner, has some inside information about the new film. I don't doubt that she's still friendly with people in that company.

Mordy, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Of course, on rereading her post, she seems to be quoting some Hollywood gossip website. Not her insider contacts.

Mordy, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:37 (fifteen years ago) link

David, presumably DC Comics, which is owned by Warner

no wai! :p

Forgive me if I'm skeptical of someone that used to work for Batfolks' book division reporting rumors of a movie that's in pre-pre-pre-pre production.

xpost - BWAH HAH HAH

David R., Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Hmmm... I was just forwarded this from two different people:

Johnny Depp to play Riddler in next flick?

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 31 July 2008 21:44 (fifteen years ago) link

johnny depp <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< crispin glover

jeff, Thursday, 31 July 2008 21:46 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah this is not a good idea

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 31 July 2008 21:47 (fifteen years ago) link

This was awesome!

One thing tho.

D'ya reckon the detonators on each boat...

a) Blew up the other boat
b) Blew up their own boat
c) Blew up both boats

Have at it, folx...

Just got offed, Thursday, 31 July 2008 21:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Relax. It's two weeks after the release of the current movie. This is not set in stone, or even the foam on top of a beer mug.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 21:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh. Pretty much everyone raised the same issue. Poll?

Just got offed, Friday, 1 August 2008 00:23 (fifteen years ago) link

There's no way not a single person on the non-convict boat would be willing to press the button. No way.

chap, Friday, 1 August 2008 00:41 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah IRL that wouldve resulted in a brawl for the detonator on each end (the convict side wouldve known the situation as well) & an explosion within 30 seconds

still, fairly good cinema

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 00:43 (fifteen years ago) link

the whole "LETS VOTE ON IT" thing on the civillian ferry was borderline too corny though

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 00:44 (fifteen years ago) link

I reckon both detonators triggered both boats, myself.

Just got offed, Friday, 1 August 2008 00:44 (fifteen years ago) link

nah because then the joker wouldnt have been able to make any real kind of point - it'd be more clever if each detonator blew up the boat it was on, so he could actually victimize the dead as a kind of insult to injury

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 00:45 (fifteen years ago) link

http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/4017/applausegp1.gif

Alfred Soto: I just caught up with with this thread and your recent thoughts and I agree mightily with your comments on Nolan's disinterest in Wayne/Batman and a lot of other things you've mentioned. I think that Nolan is uninterested in probing character motivation in films, generally.

Cunga, Friday, 1 August 2008 00:52 (fifteen years ago) link

That reminds me of this fabulous hoax.

chap, Friday, 1 August 2008 00:55 (fifteen years ago) link

ok so about as expected: long, loud, incoherent nonsense. heath ledger pretty entertaining. chris nolan is a lousy action director. nothing about the movie makes sense, narratively, morally or otherwise. better than the last one, i'll give it that.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 03:44 (fifteen years ago) link

ding ding ding, RONG, ladies, show 'em what he's won...

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 03:46 (fifteen years ago) link

and...just a reminder...RONG

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 03:47 (fifteen years ago) link

trifecta...RONG

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 03:47 (fifteen years ago) link

it's really pretty bad filmmaking. characters, plot, action sequences, everything about it is lumpy and unconvincing except heath ledger. and he's unconvincing too when he has to provide "depth" (that really horrible bit of dialogue where he has to explain his scars). i liked the ferryboat bit, which didn't have any confusing action for nolan to try to sort out. swooping over hong kong was pretty nifty, except that they had to invent a whole 10-minute sequence to justify about 30 seconds of cool footage.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 03:54 (fifteen years ago) link

everything about it is lumpy and unconvincing except heath ledger. and he's unconvincing too when he has to provide "depth" (that really horrible bit of dialogue where he has to explain his scars)

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh wtf

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 03:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Nolan's action sequences are fantastic. they only suck if you're sitting on the right side of the theatre in the front row. try not to bring pipes to the theatre next time.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 03:57 (fifteen years ago) link

i just hate to see people settling for so little in their big-budget thrills. between this and casino royale, it's like people are impressed just to see a lot of crane shots and "moral ambiguity."

all 3 bourne movies are at least 2X better than the last two batman movies (as a point of comparison).

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Condescending, party of one!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:01 (fifteen years ago) link

i think bourne vs batman would be a great debate (someone brought up the bourne flicks earlier) but youre argument seems totally agenda-ridden, i mean you DID get that the joker was totally BSing, that the 'depth' of those sequences was meant to work on a couple levels, & that 'that really horrible bit' happened like 3 times in the movie, right?

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:02 (fifteen years ago) link

yea, unless we're to believe he got his scars both from sticking a knife in his own mouth AND his father, quite coincidentally! :)

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:04 (fifteen years ago) link

yes he was lying. he always lied! or did he! he was just like us, but more honest. or was he? so meta.

the nolans always have terrible dialogue. (they got away with it in memento because who cared about the dialogue?) not that i'm claiming any great things for, say, the bourne dialogue. the relative lack of dialogue in those movies is one of their strengths.

i'm mostly just puzzled by all the things being glommed onto this movie, which is pretty gummed-up to begin with. i didn't hate it, it sort of held my attention intermittently, but the story did nothing but get stupider as it went and man people just don't know how to bring a blockbuster in under 2 hours anymore do they?

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:14 (fifteen years ago) link

*waiting for examples of said dialogue*

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:16 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean really, all the white-knight-dark-knight stuff culminating in the final portentous voiceover, i was actively embarrassed to be in the theater. whatever gary oldman got paid to say that, it wasn't enough.

(xpost, but there you go)

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:18 (fifteen years ago) link

what were you expecting in a comic book movie, David Mamet?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:19 (fifteen years ago) link

no, not at all. but you can't call it a great movie on one hand and then turn around and say of course it's lightweight nonsense what-do-you-expect on the other. (which maybe you aren't saying, i don't know, it's a long thread.)

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:26 (fifteen years ago) link

hay i seen a hollywood movie (that really horrible bit of dialogue where he has to explain his scars) atleast X 2 yu mean

Sébastien, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:28 (fifteen years ago) link

just dropping by without context. can someone pls link to that thread that resume long threads%?

Sébastien, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:29 (fifteen years ago) link

i expect comic-book movies to be incoherent nonsense, i just hope for them to be better-made and less overbearing.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:30 (fifteen years ago) link

"yes he was lying. he always lied! or did he! he was just like us, but more honest. or was he? so meta."

huh??

i really want to take my by now probably typical 'youre getting way too philosophical & ignoring the viscerality that is this formats best & primary means of speaking to its audience' tack but id get accused of being a rube

in defense of that line of argument though: the first scene wasnt about depth or explaining the jokers origins (maybe, to some extent, it was intended to be deceptively so) - it was about making us wonder what the fuck he was about to do to this dude, & keeping us on the edge of our seats while we waited to find out. the second scene (iirc, there mayve been another in between or after) was meant to do the same as far as maggie g's charcter was concerned, while expanding the complexity of the joker - if youre so intellectually distant from the movie that you didnt give a damn about its more visceral aspects, i dont know why you bothered to pay for it, except to tell people as much

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:36 (fifteen years ago) link

if youre so intellectually distant from the movie that you didnt give a damn about its more visceral aspects, i dont know why you bothered to pay for it, except to tell people as much

because everybody including my brother, ilx and manohla dargis told me it was better than it is. and i love my brother, i like ilx and i don't have anything against manohla dargis. i just ain't feel it. i don't begrudge warner bros. my $11, but having spent it i'm allowed to say it's a pretty dull event.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:49 (fifteen years ago) link

well, it was no Goodbye, Dragon Inn...

rockapads, Friday, 1 August 2008 05:00 (fifteen years ago) link

fewer steamed buns, for one thing.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 05:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i do agree that this movie was too long. the hong kong sequence was nifty but will probably be fast forwarded when i buy the DVD.

another big issue i had, and i hope this isn't any kind of spoiler alert at this point in the thread, is that the whole plan with the bombs on the ferries is just impossible to plan in advance. i try really hard to suspend my disbelief for villainous schemes in comic book adaptations, but the idea that he knew the city would be evacuated on these ferry boats, and had the manpower and foresight to load hundreds of barrels of gas or whatever it was onto them was so ridiculous i found myself wanting to rewind to figure out what i missed. i guess the bus backing into the bank thing was pretty bad that way, too.

rockapads, Friday, 1 August 2008 05:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i liked both this and BB, but agree that they don't touch the Bourne movies. and frankly they didn't come close to bringing me the kind of joy I felt the first time i read Batman: Year One and The Long Halloween, either.

rockapads, Friday, 1 August 2008 05:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't really understand needing to compare the Bourne vs. the Batman films - beside that they came out during the same era, are of high overall quality and star power, and have some absurdly overdirected fight scenes, they don't exactly live in the same universes, you know?

And dear Lord, don't ever pay attention to Manohla Dargis, she is terrible.

Nhex, Friday, 1 August 2008 08:15 (fifteen years ago) link

another big issue i had, and i hope this isn't any kind of spoiler alert at this point in the thread, is that the whole plan with the bombs on the ferries is just impossible to plan in advance. i try really hard to suspend my disbelief for villainous schemes in comic book adaptations, but the idea that he knew the city would be evacuated on these ferry boats, and had the manpower and foresight to load hundreds of barrels of gas or whatever it was onto them was so ridiculous i found myself wanting to rewind to figure out what i missed. i guess the bus backing into the bank thing was pretty bad that way, too.

compare and contrast "no, I shoot the bus driver" and a bus immediately ploughing through the wall vs trying to blow up a hospital with the detonator in his hand and it not going off and him mashing the keys over and over and looking really stupid

MPx4A, Friday, 1 August 2008 09:27 (fifteen years ago) link

the latter still raises questions about his ability to make explosives be everywhere tho

MPx4A, Friday, 1 August 2008 09:28 (fifteen years ago) link

When he drove out of the bank into the convoy of other buses, didn't one of the other drivers think "hey there's a bus driving out of a bank, and lookie here's a load of police cars coming towards the bank, that's a bit sus..."?

Could've done the boat thing with a more modest and undetectable bomb, instead of a whole engine room full of oil barrels.

ledge, Friday, 1 August 2008 10:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Hadn't the Joker mined the tunnels leading out of the city (or done something to them, at any rate) so he knew the ferries would have to be used for the evacuation. Of course, how he arranged to get one ferry full of convicts and another full of civilians was the major leap of logic for me.

Stone Monkey, Friday, 1 August 2008 11:59 (fifteen years ago) link

It wasn't neccessary to prove his point that it was so, would've worked as well with two ferries of civilians. It was a nice bonus I suspect.

chap, Friday, 1 August 2008 12:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I think the key thing people are forgetting is that this is a film.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 1 August 2008 12:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I knew if this thread went on long enough all the joy would be sucked out of this movie.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Friday, 1 August 2008 12:46 (fifteen years ago) link

A thread either dies a hero or lives long enough to suck all the joy out of a movie.

Alba, Friday, 1 August 2008 13:07 (fifteen years ago) link

i try really hard to suspend my disbelief for villainous schemes in comic book adaptations, but the idea that he knew the city would be evacuated on these ferry boats, and had the manpower and foresight to load hundreds of barrels of gas or whatever it was onto them was so ridiculous i found myself wanting to rewind to figure out what i missed.

-- rockapads, Friday, August 1, 2008 1:03 AM

Hadn't the Joker mined the tunnels leading out of the city (or done something to them, at any rate) so he knew the ferries would have to be used for the evacuation. Of course, how he arranged to get one ferry full of convicts and another full of civilians was the major leap of logic for me.

-- Stone Monkey, Friday, August 1, 2008 7:59 AM

Yes, when the Joker makes his announcement, you see a bunch of people sitting in a bar watching it on TV, and they all start to run out in a panic, then he says that perhaps he's mined the tunnels and bridges, and everyone comes to a stop, not knowing how to proceed.

Do people just get instant amnesia when they leave theaters these days, or do they not pay attention if something isn't exploding?

Pancakes Hackman, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:15 (fifteen years ago) link

yes

David R., Friday, 1 August 2008 14:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Do people just get instant amnesia when they leave theaters these days, or do they not pay attention if something isn't exploding?

to be fair, it is easy for details to get lost in overlong movies with nonsensical, convoluted plots in which characters repeatedly do dumb things for no good reason except to set up the next nonsensical, convoluted action set-piece.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:43 (fifteen years ago) link

GO WATCH A MIKE LEIGH FILM, BORING PERSON

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:43 (fifteen years ago) link

i like action movies. (that's why i mentioned the bourne films in comparison, so as to avoid directives to go watch mike leigh films.)(although i like some mike leigh films, it's true.) but this is just a fitfully entertaining brainless big-budget jumble. it's your basic 2-star movie.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:52 (fifteen years ago) link

the one voice of honest reason amid the blind hyperbolic masses

Just got offed, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Alfred Soto: I just caught up with with this thread and your recent thoughts and I agree mightily with your comments on Nolan's disinterest in Wayne/Batman and a lot of other things you've mentioned. I think that Nolan is uninterested in probing character motivation in films, generally.

Well, thanks! tipsy mothra also OTM.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link

GO WATCH EVIL FRENCH / ASIAN SHLOCK MOVIES, STUDENT PERSON

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link

scik i agree with you more or less utterly about this movie, i was doing something there known as "holding up a mirror"

Just got offed, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:57 (fifteen years ago) link

I was taking the piss, Louis. I know yr a graduate now.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:00 (fifteen years ago) link

the one voice of honest reason amid the blind hyperbolic masses

ha. no. it's just, this is a long thread about this movie, i saw this movie yesterday, i like talking about movies. i'm just doing the same thing as the other 150 people here who have commented on it. i don't share the consensus enthusiasm and find it a little puzzling, but i'm sure the consensus will somehow survive that shock.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:00 (fifteen years ago) link

this movie looks like some old bullshit to me

and what, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:03 (fifteen years ago) link

well fair enough! just wish you'd made your subjectivity a bit more obvious y'know. :P xpost

Personally, I thought it flew by, and the lack of a formula worked in it favour. It was like an (awesome) extended television drama in its pacing.

Just got offed, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:03 (fifteen years ago) link

ive seen tipsy comment on other movie threads & he's always insightful as fuck, which is why i'm sorta taken aback by how BORING (no offense meant srsly, but SM is right) his criticisms are: tips i think maybe you unfortunately bought the line that this movie is truly beyond its genre, when its not, it just does it really really fucking well. i get the idea that this kind of movie isnt really yr cup of tea (could be totally wrong) but that you were led to believe this one was truly special or something, & it is (imo), but if youre not willing to buy into the spirit of the genre youre still going to hate it. thats sort of my take on yr criticism anyway, i dunno.

i would like to hear more about how everyones decision making is non-sensical & stupid outside of the set pieces tho, ill probably hate what you have to say & roll my eyes but i dont remember feeling that right now

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:11 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't know jack about comics but this movie inspired me to buy "batman:year one" and "the long Halloween" and "the killing joke" from amazon! I don't think I've read a comic in 15 years.

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:29 (fifteen years ago) link

all three of those are really good, Moore one is probably the silliest

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Year One probably the best thing Miller ever did imho (good thing he didn't draw it)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Ah really? I thought Moore was like the comic genius dude?

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:33 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah he is and the book is good but its pretty tossed off. it is not representative of his work in general at all.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:38 (fifteen years ago) link

(beyond its reliance on narrative/graphic symmetry - a trick he uses fairly consistently)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Killing Joke is really good as a non-Moore comic, I think. It's just that with Moore's name attached, fans get really disappointed.

Mordy, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:58 (fifteen years ago) link

as Moore says "its just a Batman Annual"

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 19:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Pretty much with tipsy here. I thought it was an okay film, but by no means a great one (speaking as someone who has no strong feelings either way about the superhero genre). Plot was an incoherent string of implausible schemes; Dent/Two-Face was a pointless character who contributed nothing more than a nice piece of gross-out SPFX; Bale as Wayne was okay, Bale as Batman was laughable; fight scenes were inept and far too plentiful; the oppressive brutality and seriousness made the comic-book contrivances seem glaringly ridiculous; and the last hour was a slog. The film does raise some interesting philosophical and political questions, and a lot of the acting was top-notch (fine work from the supporting players and a star turn from Ledger), but that's all I got out of it. Want to see it again, but mostly 'cuz I'm sure I must have missed something.

Felt the same way about the LotR movies, though, so maybe it's just that I don't like fun.

contenderizer, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm more or less with you, contenderizer. It occurred to me a few days ago that I didn't discuss Dent/Two-Face much in my review; but a "nice piece of gross-out FX" plus (I'd add) "most purely symbolic figure in the film" is a good way to go.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:19 (fifteen years ago) link

incoherent, pointless, laughable, inept, ridiculous, brainless, nonsensical, embarassing...these are the problems with the movie?

ok, that's just a bit hyperbolic, don't you think? you can dislike a movie without actively insulting everyone who did like it!

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:41 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean i dont really get why everyone has to either think it's a genius perfect masterwork or a brainless incoherent mess. surely it's a work of art/commerce that deserves at least a slightly more measured response?

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:42 (fifteen years ago) link

yes, maybe a few thousand more posts

goole, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

i will MURDER those who dislike it with my bare fucking hands

omar little, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Wet Nap?

David R., Friday, 1 August 2008 20:45 (fifteen years ago) link

You can dislike a movie without actively insulting everyone who did like it!

-- ryan

Ummm, nothing personal? Wasn't calling you pointless and far too plentiful, ryan. Just, you know, the movie...

contenderizer, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link

ok, that's just a bit hyperbolic, don't you think? you can dislike a movie without actively insulting everyone who did like it!

Where'd you get that impression? Do you need air?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link

tips i think maybe you unfortunately bought the line that this movie is truly beyond its genre, when its not, it just does it really really fucking well. i get the idea that this kind of movie isnt really yr cup of tea (could be totally wrong) but that you were led to believe this one was truly special or something, & it is (imo), but if youre not willing to buy into the spirit of the genre youre still going to hate it. thats sort of my take on yr criticism anyway, i dunno.

i like some comic-book movies and i even used to buy comics in my tender teen years. first couple chris reeve superman movies are good, i liked the 2nd xmen movie, i even liked the crow. and like i said on the tim burton thread, i liked batman returns. what i think all of those are successful at to varying degrees is creating a coherent world for their characters and plots (however basically silly they might be). so the gotham of batman returns and the detroit of the crow are these totally artificial places but they seem fully imagined (and set directed). when you're going to mount these kind of pop-myth morality plays, you need a good stage for it. characterizations are almost by definition going to be two-dimensional, but you can be colorful and engaging and imaginative in two dimensions, which heath ledger obviously demonstrates but nobody else even comes close to.

i think in these last 2 batmans, the city isn't particularly conceived in any well-defined way -- batman begins sort of gestured at an escape from new york-type urban nightmare, but in a real creaky theme-park-ride way, and the potentially interesting conceit in the new one of making the city as "realistic" as possible just for me fell flat. not enough people, color, urban personality. it felt like an underpopulated soundstage. beyond that, the story just ... isn't really anything. joker does this, joker does that, bwahahaha. i know it's silly to get into analyzing the motivations of the characters in things like this, but the whole "some men just want to see the world burn" thing is kind of, i mean, who cares? it lets the writers off the hook because they can have him do just about anything without needing any of it to make sense. as for people acting stupidly, pretty much everyone in the movie acts stupidly from start to finish. the ridiculous scheme of having dent turn himself in so they can lure the joker and blah blah blah was just batshit dumb and existed primarily to enable that tractor-trailer-and-batmobile chase -- which went on too long and was not very well edited. the way people kept talking all the time about how crooked gordon's guys were (to set up the eventual kidnapping of dent and rachel) was so clumsy it barely counts as foreshadowing. it was like paint-by-numbers screenwriting. then there's the problem of making dent's moral transformation convincing -- a challenge, but one they totally failed. it was just like, kazam, he's CRAZY. and ... well, you know, i could go on because i pretty much didn't believe anything in the movie even on its own terms, but you get the idea.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Ned's posts and essays have included some of the best defenses of the film I've read.

(xpost)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:51 (fifteen years ago) link

batshit dumb

omar little, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:52 (fifteen years ago) link

and also i don't think calling the movie "incoherent nonsense" is an indictment of people who liked it, or even necessarily of the movie. there are movies i like that i'd call incoherent nonsense. (charlie's angels 2: full throttle!)

xpost: yeah, i liked what ned wrote about it. it was among the things that persuaded me to see it. and i can see where he's coming from, i just didn't feel it the same way.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Yow. Tipsy OTM and then some. Especially this:

...the potentially interesting conceit in the new one of making the city as "realistic" as possible just for me fell flat. not enough people, color, urban personality. it felt like an underpopulated soundstage.
Deliriously artificial Gotham in Burton's Batman flix was better developed and felt more credible (not realistic, but alive) than the supposedly "real" city on display here.

beyond that, the story just ... isn't really anything. joker does this, joker does that, bwahahaha.
That too.

contenderizer, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:58 (fifteen years ago) link

it's an good action movie, looks nice, supporting cast are excellent and ledger brilliant. but it's overly long, the lead characters (as tipsy put it) make some baffling decisions just to set up the next set piece, and has quite a few really dumb plot holes- so dumb that they pretty much spoiled it for me.

contenderizer and tipsy OTM

darraghmac, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Ned's posts and essays have included some of the best defenses of the film I've read.

Thanks (and thanks to Tipsy) -- I *want* there to be debate about the film. There needs to be, and said give-and-take may not make us budge from our respective positions, but they do illustrate both the film in greater detail as well as our respective reactions and perspectives. Which is a very good thing.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:04 (fifteen years ago) link

I will I think have one last blog post on it about the sheer spectacle of it in the IMAX format, but not for a couple of days yet.

So anyway, The Mummy: Tomb of Jet Li!

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:05 (fifteen years ago) link

i wasnt taking it personally! i never do. just a little peeved at the excessive rhetoric. but yes i do need air. just a lot of the negative takes on the movie circle around a reductio ad absurdum, and that's bothersome to me because it's the opposite of really engaging with the movie.

beyond that, the story just ... isn't really anything. joker does this, joker does that, bwahahaha.

i mean no offfense, but this isn't a criticism so much as a meaningless snarky aside. seriously, no offense. i just dont get where you're coming from AT ALL with comments like that.

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:07 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean there's like 500 fucking posts of people staking out different ideas on exactly what the story is doing...so jumping in and saying "nah it's just random bullshit" is sorta wtf.

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:08 (fifteen years ago) link

it felt like an underpopulated soundstage

This is actually a big flaw for me when it comes to Batman Returns compared to the first Batman -- the second film felt MUCH smaller.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:09 (fifteen years ago) link

a villain bent on chaos drives the action, what is so incomprehensible about that. the real story (and I think Nolan agrees) is about the moral compromises necessary to combat such a villain, and the toll it takes/transformation of Harvey Dent. whether or not Eckhardt does a good job of it is debatable - calling him "the most obvious symbolic character" is undeniable - but I think his story arc is a bit more developed than "kazam he's crazy!" Ned is correct in his praise of Dent's speech at the end about what's fair, etc. that was genuinely creepy/moving to me, even if it came a bit too late in the film. The film does seem a bit indecisive as to whether Dent's transformation should be the cruz of the plot, or if it should just let the audience get carried away by the Joker doing crazy shit/blowing things up.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:11 (fifteen years ago) link

christ the first Burton Batman is SO TERRIBLE, never understand why people rep for it.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:11 (fifteen years ago) link

cruz = crux duh

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:12 (fifteen years ago) link

The Penelope Cruz of the plot

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Ryan: it's not that the story isn't rich in detail (I'd call it overcomplexified before I'd call it simplistic), it's that it's narratively shapeless. The bulk of the movie consists of the Joker doing some shit, and everybody else going, "Aaagh! The Joker's doing some shit!", and then the Joker doing some other shit, and everybody going "Aaagh!" again, and so on. And so on. It's like watching a fish flop around on deck. While the romantic triangle between Harvey, Bruce and Rachel is coherently structured and thus kinda meaningful, narratively, a lot of the rest is frantic, punch-happy gibberish.

contenderizer, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:20 (fifteen years ago) link

This is actually a big flaw for me when it comes to Batman Returns compared to the first Batman -- the second film felt MUCH smaller.

that's true. burton kind of shrinks gotham down to snowglobe size. but everything inside the snowglobe is of a piece.

(and yeah the first burton one is pretty bad. ledger's joker >>>> nicholson's joker, among other things. but it did have "batdance"...)

xpost: contenderizer otm

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:21 (fifteen years ago) link

contenderizer IS otm, which is probably why im still having some trouble w/ your guys' problem w/ the movie

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:26 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah Batdance is awesome, I will grant you that.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:27 (fifteen years ago) link

and Ledger never DID fall into the arms of Orion.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 August 2008 21:29 (fifteen years ago) link

narratively, a lot of the rest is frantic, punch-happy gibberish.

This may derive in part from Nolan's attempt to structure the movie around the idea of "escalation"--which can easily seem like a one-thing-after-another kind of plot, but the attempt was, I think, to show how the actions of everyone involved precipitated an equal and opposite reaction. part of the effective horror of the film for me is the feeling of being caught in a feedback loop of chaos and hysteria.

ryan, Saturday, 2 August 2008 01:30 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^^this is a superb point; I didn't feel like the pacing was mechanical or partitioned, but that the whole thing was a glorious and accelerating mess.

Just got offed, Saturday, 2 August 2008 01:34 (fifteen years ago) link

The Joker is a catalyst, it is his very purpose in the narrative to "inject a little chaos", to accelerate reactions and events. To say the plot is incoherent is moot; of course it's incoherent, the person driving it is insane, suicidal, maniacal, homicidal. And also very, very driven.

Agree massively about Batman Returns; Gotham by that film felt empty and fraudulent, like an incomplete theatre set.

Of course The Dark Knight is ridiculous; of course the bus thing at the start is implausible; of course the idea of rigging the ferries with explosives is stupid; of course Dent is a symbolic figure rather than a believable dramatic character; this is all because The Dark Knight IS a comic book movie, but there's no reason why a comic book movie can't also be a great movie, same way a Western or a horror or an animated movie can also be a great movie. The make-up in Dawn of the Dead is ridiculous, and much of the acting is appalling - I still love it and it's reputation is still massive. The Godfather is incredibly long and drags and has much nasty brutality in it (the binlid thing!). NOTHING AT ALL HAPPENS in Citizen Kane. Taxi Driver is just dull, the characters unbelievable and unsympathetic, their actions implausible. The Bourne Identity is good apart from that ridiculous, suspension-of-disbelief-shattering subplot with Mr Eke from Lost. Heat is just a series of high-concept bank robberies; De Niro robs someone, Pacino wonders where he is and argues with his wife; rinse and repeat for THREE HOURS. No Country For Old Men doesn't make any sense and Bardem's character is barely even one dimensional. Every single Wes Anderson film is exactly the same, down to the cast. 2001: A Space Odyssey is completely unintelligible. No character motivation is explored in Badlands. That giant slob monster at the end of Akira MAKES NO SENSE. The Truman Show is completely implausible. Raiders of the Lost Ark is basically just a racist theme park ride. La Jetee is essentially a powerpoint presentation. That toad in Pan's Labyrinth doesn't look real. Many of these are my favourite films.

I enjoyed The Dark Knight massively; it's given me as much food for thought as any movie in recent years; it's also given me a wonderful in-theatre cinematic experience on two occasions, the feeling of participating in a cultural event. Plus, it was a terrific spectacle that thrilled and excited me. If you want plotholes resolving, read the novelisation.

Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 08:15 (fifteen years ago) link

The Dark Knight IS a comic book movie, but there's no reason why a comic book movie can't also be a great movie

OTM!

Nhex, Saturday, 2 August 2008 08:46 (fifteen years ago) link

^ Truth bomb. XP.

Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 08:46 (fifteen years ago) link

I watched Batman Begins again. Had forgotten that the razing of the forest motif was used there too, by Ra's Al Ghul. I love that film so much. "AND YOU NEVER WILL". BAM!

I did think about my problems with the narrative cohesion of The Dark Knight being solved by an appeal to the Joker's love of chaos, but it doesn't quite feel like a "feedback loop of chaos and hysteria" to me. The crowds turning on Coleman Reese was good and edgy enough, but I felt that loop more acutely in Batman Begins with the gassed, hallucininating panic.

Alba, Saturday, 2 August 2008 08:55 (fifteen years ago) link

The make-up in Dawn of the Dead is ridiculous, and much of the acting is appalling - I still love it and it's reputation is still massive. The Godfather is incredibly long and drags and has much nasty brutality in it (the binlid thing!). NOTHING AT ALL HAPPENS in Citizen Kane. Taxi Driver is just dull, the characters unbelievable and unsympathetic, their actions implausible. The Bourne Identity is good apart from that ridiculous, suspension-of-disbelief-shattering subplot with Mr Eke from Lost. Heat is just a series of high-concept bank robberies; De Niro robs someone, Pacino wonders where he is and argues with his wife; rinse and repeat for THREE HOURS. No Country For Old Men doesn't make any sense and Bardem's character is barely even one dimensional. Every single Wes Anderson film is exactly the same, down to the cast. 2001: A Space Odyssey is completely unintelligible. No character motivation is explored in Badlands. That giant slob monster at the end of Akira MAKES NO SENSE. The Truman Show is completely implausible. Raiders of the Lost Ark is basically just a racist theme park ride. La Jetee is essentially a powerpoint presentation. That toad in Pan's Labyrinth doesn't look real.

What you saying? That these films' strength outweigh these weaknesses? Or that none of these things are relevant? If the latter, what exactly is the point of film criticism? I think there's an interesting discussion to be had about the rules of genre filmmaking and the slack that it should or shouldn't be cut over non-genre work, but seeing as most of these films aren't genre films, you seem to just being negating analysis of any kind. Unless you just meant the former.

Alba, Saturday, 2 August 2008 09:00 (fifteen years ago) link

I assume what he was saying was that a film doesn't stop being great because it has flaws, and bringing up those flaws in the face of all a film's praise (as if to say the film is no longer great) is a bit disingenuous.

Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 09:05 (fifteen years ago) link

What has other people's praise got to do with one's own problems with a film?

Alba, Saturday, 2 August 2008 09:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Because the problems being mentioned don't address people's praise of the film. It doesn't disagree with what people like. No one is saying it's a great film because it's INCREDIBLY COHERENT. So to say it's a mediocre flick because it's not coherent is just ignoring the rest of the conversation.

Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 09:08 (fifteen years ago) link

No, it's just not letting them dictate one's own terms for evaulating the film. If, say, I put my disappointment with the film down to its narrative incohesion, it's absurd for me to stay out of a discussion of it on the grounds that other people are saying they didn't care about that incohesion.

Following on from that, it's interesting to explore why certain things matter to one person and not another. But it perhaps strains the limits of criticism's possibilities.

Alba, Saturday, 2 August 2008 09:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Well, I'm not saying you're not entitled to dislike the film for whatever reason you want. I just think that if meant as an objective (!?) critical response, saying a film lacks cohesion while ignoring its other aspects is probably poor criticism.

Mordy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 09:25 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm saying that both "these films' strengths outweigh these weaknesses" and "a film doesnt stop being great because it has flaws", plus I'm also not actually (except I guess in the case of the Bourne film) saying anything about whether I think any of the films are good (in my opinion) or not; I think they're all recognised as being at least 'good' by the vast majority of commentors, and some of them I love; some of them I also have very little time for. Most of them I quite like. But any of the criticisms leveled at The Dark Knight can also be leveled against other films the critics (of TDK) would hold up as being better. They're not better (or worse); the commentor just likes them more. For who knows what reason?

Some people will go into TDK with clear expectations and have them matched or exceeded even, and as a result love it. Some people will not have their expectations matched, and as a result will be disappointed. Some people will go in with no expectations at all and whether they like it or not will depend on their mood when they got up that morning. Or else their entire analogue of film experience over the course of their lifetime, etc etc.

It's not what other people's praise has to do with one's own problems with a film; it's what other people's problems have to do with one's own praise of a film. Most of the praisers say of the problems "yeah, but that didn't bother me; anyway, wasn't this scene great!"; many of the problem-voicers seem to be trying to pass on their unenjoyment of the film to everyone else while the praisers chatter amongst themselves. This is... probably... the nature of all criticism. Most of the time it doesn't convince. Both sides are just trying to find ways to express why they liked or didn't like something, and neither side is right.

Is TDK the greatest film ever made? No. But nothing is. Is it my favourite film? Right now it might be, until I watch another I really enjoy and start thinking about that instead.

Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 09:26 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, Alba says "most of these films aren't genre films" - what is a genre film? Are some films without genre? Is some music without genre? What is genre for? I think every film is a genre film. "Drama" is a genre with conventions and rules and slack cut it in the same way as comic book movies or horror movies.

Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 2 August 2008 10:37 (fifteen years ago) link

agreed with all of the comments above about Batman Returns. I loved the movie when I was a kid (though the ending left me empty), and was stunned two years ago when I bought it and watched it and....just DIDN'T like it.

I did like the original Batman, but even that had faded from my memory ...due to how dated it looks now

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 2 August 2008 15:35 (fifteen years ago) link

i took that list of "criticisms" to mean that criticism, in order to be effective and meaningful, has to sorta key-in to what a work of art is trying to do and trying to say. it's easy to take oneself out of an interpretative relationship with a work of art and simply proclaim it "brainless"....and it's perfectly valid to do so too!

for example, saying 2001 is "boring" or whatever may make sense from a consumer review point of view (hey if you dont like movies like that, it's your prerogative) but it doesn't really make much sense as criticism because it's doesn't try to really make sense of what 2001 is trying to do.

ryan, Saturday, 2 August 2008 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link

I find it very distracting that Gordon's predecessor is the black bloke off The Fast Show.

chap, Saturday, 2 August 2008 16:00 (fifteen years ago) link

hay guyz im still confused how they nevr explained how Twoface lost his blackness between Batman and Batman Forever

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 2 August 2008 16:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Robert Downey Jr was busy?

I know, right?, Saturday, 2 August 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

don't you diiiiiiiiiiiie on me!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 2 August 2008 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link

love ppl upthread going "give me several examples of bad dialogue", like yes i'll just dig out the shooting script i happen to have a copy right here, in my ass

gotham crime lords = most stereotypical black criminal and eastern european criminal and italian criminal ever! does gotham have a mob with an affirmative action program? or are there three entirely separate crime syndicates who actually just are really cool with each other and cooperate? christopher nolan's next movie should be an adaptation of 'river city ransom'

in terms of filmic rhetoric some of this felt so so so pat - here is some drama and a big 360 camera swivel! here is the joker, he is a bit crazy, this bit is on handheld camera! (this latter interesting because of the fake camcorder footage bits with him also - can't work out if they're meant to comment on each other or if nolan didn't think about it enough for that)

playboy bruce not a patch on playboy tony in iron man

it's a BATCAR no look it's a BATCYCLE = not as good as equiv. sequence in batman forever

-

it felt like quite a short two hours and forty minutes, though

thomp, Saturday, 2 August 2008 22:11 (fifteen years ago) link

love ppl upthread going "give me several examples of bad dialogue", like yes i'll just dig out the shooting script i happen to have a copy right here, in my ass

yea, cuz we were obviously expecting verbatim 5 minute sequences of dialogue for examples......:eyeroll:

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 2 August 2008 22:12 (fifteen years ago) link

or are there three entirely separate crime syndicates who actually just are really cool with each other and cooperate?

Oh man, I hate to be mister uber-nerd here, but this is actually covered in the direct-to-dvd animated prequel, "Batman: Gotham Knight." Basically yeah, Batman makes the Russian and Italian mobs agree to divvy up their activities in order to stop ongoing inter-mob violence.

Pancakes Hackman, Saturday, 2 August 2008 23:42 (fifteen years ago) link

i took that list of "criticisms" to mean that criticism, in order to be effective and meaningful, has to sorta key-in to what a work of art is trying to do and trying to say.

i think that's not really true. criticism can take a lot of forms, and critics aren't captive to the intent of the artist. but in any case in terms of TDK i don't think observations about narrative, stylistic and moral incoherence are really "missing" anything that the nolans are trying to say. it's just a matter of noting (or asserting, if you like) flaws in the conception and execution of the whole enterprise. you either don't agree those flaws are there, or you think they're offset by other virtues within the movie, which is fine. but it's not that people who think it's crash-bang nonsense are refusing to engage with the vision of the auteur. they just have a different opinion than you. (an opinion like, chris nolan is the most overrated hollywood guy since shyamalan.)

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 3 August 2008 00:54 (fifteen years ago) link

of course, you can say whatever you want about the movie! and you're welcome to do so...im not having a problem with any opinions. im just a little frustrated with how flippantly they are expressed. i could take one look at the sistine chapel and proclaim it "stupid" after one glance and then walk out....and no one can fault me for that, it's my opinion! but all anyone can do when confronted with that is shrug it off i guess....

ryan, Sunday, 3 August 2008 01:23 (fifteen years ago) link

fwiw, what im looking for is basically how you criticized the portrayal of Gotham, which strikes me as good criticism, even if im not sure i agree.

ryan, Sunday, 3 August 2008 01:28 (fifteen years ago) link

i understand. part of it i guess is that i think the movie doesn't really warrant much weighty analysis. i just don't think there's a whole lot there.

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:21 (fifteen years ago) link

(i have been in the reverse position on other movies -- like there will be blood, which i think is sort of genius even though it has its share of incoherence and which i've defended partly on the same visceral grounds that some people are lauding the dark knight. i understand the view of morbz and others that there isn't really much going on in TWBB -- i just disagree.)

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:23 (fifteen years ago) link

(or marie antoinette, for that matter)

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 3 August 2008 02:24 (fifteen years ago) link

The idea that a negative assessment of a film, in order to be valid, must specifically engage with and forcibly negate whatever positive assessments exist is hilarious. Thank you for that.

Anyway, "escalation of chaos" as a theme/strategy doesn't excuse narrative incoherence. If it did, Rob Zombie's Halloween remake would be a good film. And it isn't.

contenderizer, Sunday, 3 August 2008 09:07 (fifteen years ago) link

wow thank you for not being able to read

max, Sunday, 3 August 2008 11:41 (fifteen years ago) link

it's easy to take oneself out of an interpretative relationship with a work of art and simply proclaim it "brainless"....and it's perfectly valid to do so too!

max, Sunday, 3 August 2008 11:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Isn't it a mark of good thinking to engage with things on their own terms, unless those terms're unacceptable? I fucking loved this movie, for what it was and how it showed itself.

Niles Caulder, Sunday, 3 August 2008 12:02 (fifteen years ago) link

today the part of deeznuts will be played by tispy mothra

HI DERE, Sunday, 3 August 2008 12:15 (fifteen years ago) link

can safely say that probably no other comic book movie has inspired this much intense debate...which is very cool.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 3 August 2008 14:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Is this the longest single movie thread on ILX?

Just got offed, Sunday, 3 August 2008 14:49 (fifteen years ago) link

I just got invited to see it at Imax. I will now be going a fourth time. I have never seen a movie four times in a theatre before. my Regal club card is happy though.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 3 August 2008 15:09 (fifteen years ago) link

it's easy to take oneself out of an interpretative relationship with a work of art and simply proclaim it "brainless"

what if your interpretative relationship with a movie leads you to the suspicion that it doesn't have much going on in its stylish little head? like, i see all the gestures at relevancy in dark knight -- terror, torture, surveillance, the trade-offs between security and liberty, the conflict between means and ends -- but they mostly end up seeming like ... gestures at relevancy. they acknowledge some set of moral tensions, but they don't illuminate them any more than your average pundit round-table on cnn.

but so ok, i don't expect social relevancy of comic-book movies or even think they're a particular plus. on the visceral entertain-me side, like i said, i think a lot of the action sequences are not particularly well handled -- they go on too long, at a sustained pitch of frenzy that becomes monotonous, and the editing is kind of murky. (major exception is the ferry-boat scene, which i think is good and has more actual tension than most of the movie.) so i don't think that's rejecting an interpretative relationship. it's just feeling sort of unfulfilled by it.

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 3 August 2008 15:27 (fifteen years ago) link

Which, as I said earlier, comes down to the fact that you don't really like this movie and a lot of other people do seem to like it, quite a lot. And neither understands the other enough to fully empathise / change minds. And would should either?

Scik Mouthy, Sunday, 3 August 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

no, of course. criticism pro or con isn't really about changing minds anyway, right? just a chance to talk about something.

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 3 August 2008 17:07 (fifteen years ago) link

(i've had my mind changed by criticism before, probably -- in that it maybe gave me a new way of looking at or thinking about something. but more often i can enjoy good criticism of something, like ned's thoughts about this movie, even if i don't share the critic's opinion of the work itself.)

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 3 August 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

based on the review excerpts you posted before you even saw the film i think your mind was halfway made up before you went into this thing, morbs.

omar little, Sunday, 3 August 2008 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't get all that anyway, esp since people can read into shit like this exactly what they want to read. don't even get me started on the dude i overheard talking about how hellboy 2 was probably "john mccain's favorite film".

omar little, Sunday, 3 August 2008 17:29 (fifteen years ago) link

like john mccain even saw the first hellboy

omar little, Sunday, 3 August 2008 17:29 (fifteen years ago) link

no, of course. criticism pro or con isn't really about changing minds anyway, right? just a chance to talk about something.

yeah. we'd probably have to get obnoxiously theoretical to really talk about this well, but i think, in short, good criticism simply brings your attention to something you didn't notice on your own. makes it possible to "see" something you couldn't see before. how this affects your subjective feelings about the movie is something different and maybe only related in an indirect way. (like if someone reads a movie as marxist it could either turn you off or turn you on.)

ryan, Sunday, 3 August 2008 17:42 (fifteen years ago) link

I know when I saw Black Hawn Down, and then learned the truth about the real life counterparts portrayed in the movie, it ruined my initial assessment of the movie

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 3 August 2008 20:48 (fifteen years ago) link

so the new rumor is that Maggie Gyllenhall will be catwoman in the next film. makes total sense (9 lives lolz) particularly since her and Eckhardt are both under contract for two films.

Shakey Mo Collier, Sunday, 3 August 2008 21:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Who said that Rachel didn't die? Oh snap.

Mordy, Sunday, 3 August 2008 21:18 (fifteen years ago) link

i would find that easier to believe if rachel at any point demonstrated an affinity for cats, right before her 'death' in TDK she came into physical contact w/ a cat and the explosion resulted in her absorbing cat powers/thinking

batwing, Sunday, 3 August 2008 21:24 (fifteen years ago) link

*or* right before her 'death'

batwing, Sunday, 3 August 2008 21:25 (fifteen years ago) link

What started this whole "Catwoman has cat powers" thing? I've heard others confused by this before, but the only instance of this I can remember of this happening was that Birds of Prey TV series. I don't think she had any powers in the previous films or TV series. Even in Batman Returns, it's not like she actually has nine lives.

Nhex, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:10 (fifteen years ago) link

the Catwoman is supposed to be Selina Kyle, isn't she?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:26 (fifteen years ago) link

Mostly. Like nearly all comics continuity, there are exceptions.

Oilyrags, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:29 (fifteen years ago) link

welp, i just bought the Watchmen graphic novel, so I'll have my hands full for a while....

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:30 (fifteen years ago) link

besides, you got the rumor wrong. It's Jake that is going to be Catwoman.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:33 (fifteen years ago) link

flipside was in this

conrad, Sunday, 3 August 2008 22:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Even in Batman Returns, it's not like she actually has nine lives.

I think maybe you should rewatch Batman Returns because she rather emphatically has nine lives in it.

HI DERE, Monday, 4 August 2008 00:15 (fifteen years ago) link

saw it for the second time today, still really good, and seemed better constructed and less murky this time... which i guess means it's pretty clunky and murky if it takes two viewings to clear up.

it struck me that there are a lot of subtle jokes in it, the script could have been played for laffs much more -- i was the only one that chuckled out loud at this:

(talking about the sonar cell phone thing in hong kong)
fox: it sends out a high frequency pulse, imaging the surroundings, like--
wayne: a submarine?
fox: right. like a submarine.

goole, Monday, 4 August 2008 05:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Watched the 1989 Burton Batman last night, for the first time in... I'd say at least ten years, maybe more like 15. And you know what? It looked quite good - Grissom's office for instance was beautiful - although much of Gotham was obviously either painted backdrops or models, they were beautifully done. But it still looked like an expensive theatre set rather than a movie.

Other brief thoughts...

The Batwing was... ridiculous.

Keaton has NO physical presence, and the idea that neither Knox nor Vale knows what the richest socialite / philanthropist in the city looked like was silly. His distractedness was good. Useless as a playboy figure, though.

Nicholson as the Joker... The fact that the sets looked like they were for a theatre production (presumably of Bugsy Malone) was fitting, because his performance was hammy as fuck, and straight out of a pantomime. Nowhere near Ledger. Not even fit to lace his boots. "Bob, don't forget, you're my... main... guhay" with all the weezing and the Cesar Romero suit. Rubbish. Not scary, not deranged. And what's with all the "I'm an artist until somebody dies" nonsense. Both Romero and Nicholson were old men when they played The Joker. That speaks volumes for the character's physicality. How high were his suit trousers? How thick his midriff?

And anyone complaining about narrative incoherence in TDK, well... good grief. None of Burton's first Batman makes any sense. Nothing is explained. There seems to be no narrative order. I don't really know how it fills two hours. And the fight sequences... don't exist, somehow.

Also, we see Batman right at the start, and then not again until nearly an hour in. And that rubber suit. Oh my. I'd love to know what Bale would have thought of wearing that.

The Batmobile is super cool, though.

But other than that... aside from talking about visual effects and performances and nonsensical narrative, there's NOTHING to talk about in Burton's Batman. No moral issues. No plot twists (or even holes; the narrative is that absent that picking holes in it is pointless; it's JUST a hole). No character development. Nothing. Nada. Zip.

Quite good fun though. But in a barely evolved from Adam West kind of way. The set and costume design was better and there were no Biff Pow Blam cards, but other than that... it felt so campy. Admittedly I've never seen any of the Schumacher Batman films, and this might be fabulously dark and involving compared to them, but it's nothing compared to Nolan's interpretation.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 4 August 2008 06:08 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^ This is why the second Burton Batman movie is so much better.

HI DERE, Monday, 4 August 2008 09:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Recent comment about the first Batman film from a friend off-board: "Every line feels like a non-sequitur."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I love Keaton's Bruce Wayne though.

"My life is really... complex."

Roz, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:10 (fifteen years ago) link

i always liked keaton as batman/wayne despite the movies not being all that great

latebloomer, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Christian Bale is to Michael Keaton as Brandon Routh is to Christopher Reeve.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:41 (fifteen years ago) link

But but George Clooney

Ned Raggett, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:42 (fifteen years ago) link

It's possible that he boasted superior nipples.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:44 (fifteen years ago) link

That analogy doesn't work because Brandon Routh is quite obviously aping Christopher Reeve and Christian Bale is quite obviously not aping Michael Keaton.

HI DERE, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:45 (fifteen years ago) link

That's one way of looking at it. I see them as feckless younger men trying to sound adult.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:46 (fifteen years ago) link

I saw Keaton as a nearly middle-aged man of not imposing physique trying to play a kick-ass martial arts bat superhero, and failing.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Bale's appeal as Batman / Wayne is that he's quite juvenile, I thought.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link

"She was going to wait for me, Alfred."

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Keaton's Batman/Wayne is pretty juvenile as well! "You weigh a little more than a hundred and eight." and the bit where he's trying to confess to Vicki Vale and mouths to himself "I'm Batman. I. am. Batman." haha.

I'm kinda lukewarm on Bale's Bruce Wayne but he's waaay better than Brandon Routh. (and by better, I mean hotter. but also better.)

Roz, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:55 (fifteen years ago) link

re gyllenhaal as catwoman, oh please oh please be true true true

Doctor Casino, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Bale's appeal as Batman / Wayne is that he's quite juvenile, I thought.

-- Scik Mouthy, Monday, August 4, 2008 3:52 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

otm, he has the kind of youthful arrogance and self-seriousness one would need to be batman. which is why he works as batman/bruce wayne for me.

latebloomer, Monday, 4 August 2008 16:01 (fifteen years ago) link

the difference is that Bale as Wayne is basically Bale in American Psycho, which works great. Keaton as Wayne is more like, I dunno, Keaton in Mr. Mom.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 4 August 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link

The other difference is that Keaton comes across as being right to be running around as Batman and Bale seems to be totally bonkers insane and slowly realizing it as the movies progress.

HI DERE, Monday, 4 August 2008 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link

This was 2/3s of a good movie (much better than B-Man Begins) and then stupid Two Face plot happens and then its completely cliche and awful for the last 45 or so minutes.

Alex in SF, Monday, 4 August 2008 19:12 (fifteen years ago) link

So yeah, a third piece. But there's more I'm still digging into regarding not only the film but its reception.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 04:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I see them as feckless younger men trying to sound adult.

However much it matters, Brandon Routh was a year older than Reeve was at the time their respective movies were released. (27 vs. 26) Keaton was seven years older than Bale was at the time of release of their first Batman films. (38 vs. 31)

Pancakes Hackman, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 11:49 (fifteen years ago) link

(talking about the sonar cell phone thing in hong kong)
fox: it sends out a high frequency pulse, imaging the surroundings, like--
wayne: a submarine?
fox: right. like a submarine.

i'm not sure i see the funny in this either

Ste, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 12:42 (fifteen years ago) link

right. like a submarine. not like a bat. batman. you're batman. bats do that too. not just submarines. you said submarine but you could very well have said bat. you're batman. like a bat.

conrad, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 12:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Man, I keep seeing this thread grow bigger and bigger everyday and this goddamn movie still hasnt come out in theatres where I live and it makes me fucking mad. I'm growing tired of anticipating this movie. When will it finally be the 13th of august!

Jibe, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 12:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah we cracked up at that, too, especially with the "what the hell is wrong with you" smirk Lucius gave Bruce during the last line of that exchange.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 12:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Hahaha, I totally didn't even get the bat/submarine thing! That's really funny! I took it as just like "...yeah, sure, if that's how you want to understand my ridiculously complicated science device."

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 13:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I did too; the bat thing is, now it's been pointed out, very obvious and very funny.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:03 (fifteen years ago) link

So, uh, more rumors making their way around the interwebs:

Phillip Seymour Hoffman as Penguin, but Nolan says he has absolutely no interest in introducing that character into his movies.

Angelina Jolie has expressed interest in playing Catwoman. Could her star power trump Maggie?

Anyway, just thought I'd pass those along, apologies if they were mentioned and I missed 'em.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I think, given the success of TDK, that no one is going to force Nolan into doing something he doesn't want to do in a third film if (when) he makes one.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:12 (fifteen years ago) link

keep angelina jolie away from this

goole, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:14 (fifteen years ago) link

oh haha the bat/submarine thing can't believe i didn't see that. (actually yes i can).

funny tho.

Ste, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Well it's the director's fault if so many people need it explained to them. Who cares about the lines though eh? Let's hire good actors and hope for the best while we spend 14 months getting the lighting right. /dingbod

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:21 (fifteen years ago) link

wtf? Are you all taking the piss about the bat/submarine thing? It was so heavily signposted with Morgan Freeman's raised eyebrows the whole audience felt had to give a politely nervous snigger.

Alba, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:51 (fifteen years ago) link

I missed it too. Wanna rewatch now just for that line.

ledge, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Not taking the piss at all. The bat connection didn't jump out to me; I just saw it as Lucias being bemused at Wayne reducing seriously hi-end technology to a childlike analogy.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 14:57 (fifteen years ago) link

It's just occurred to me that Wayne's "like a submarine?" comment could have beena continuation of his half-hearted and jovial refusal to acknowledge his 'hobby' overtly to Lucias (as protection?) - like "for... base-jumping", etc.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 15:10 (fifteen years ago) link

i wonder if bale even got the joke

goole, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 15:11 (fifteen years ago) link

You guys are misremembering and misreading that scene. Wayne is about to say "like a bat" and give away the game when Fox says "like a submarine" and reminds him to keep his cool.

Oilyrags, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 15:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I was thinking there should have been a scene where Bruce Wayne wakes up with a sore throat, and Alfred says something like "Well, if you must insist on putting on that rough voice of yours". Then Alfred gets him some throat sweets.

jel --, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 15:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Ahhhhh @ Oilyrags.

Scik Mouthy, Tuesday, 5 August 2008 15:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Surely we need at least one post on here today.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 21:41 (fifteen years ago) link

not if it's one of yours

and what, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 21:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Were you waiting to pounce?

Raw Patrick, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 21:51 (fifteen years ago) link

batman + submarine lols: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_igqZWsNgwg

Jordan, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 22:04 (fifteen years ago) link

this movie sort of diminishes every time i think about it... i wish i could just go and see the IMAX segments again.

amateurist, Thursday, 7 August 2008 01:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Jesus Christ, took me a day and a half of half-ass reading to get through this thread.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 7 August 2008 05:17 (fifteen years ago) link

To draw quickly and haphazardly, if you'll forgive me (especially forgive me for reviving the Batman/Bush discussion now three weeks old or something):

Joker pushes Batman to the limits of his rules, and by the end of the film has forced Bats to break his rules. He doesn't exactly do it reluctantly, but when it's over he's remorseful and recognizes that he's done something wrong. He judges himself (why else effectively hold himself accountable by having the police hunt him?), Nolan judges him, and I think the audience is expected to judge him as well.

In other words: this is not a vindication of the means Batman/Bushco pursues. It's a repudiation. At best, as was said so astutely upthread, it's a sympathetic critique. Batman makes the wrong decision (and he deserves to be held to account) but there may not be a right one.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 7 August 2008 05:52 (fifteen years ago) link

i honestly don't think this film's ideas are worth taking seriously or contemplating more than 45 minutes after the film ends....

amateurist, Thursday, 7 August 2008 10:10 (fifteen years ago) link

seeing this tonight

Ste, Thursday, 7 August 2008 10:33 (fifteen years ago) link

I left the cinema just under 45 minutes ago, so there's still time:
1. war-on-terror is all the way through this like Brighton Rock. So much so that at times I forget I'm watching Batman, and think I'm watching live waterboarding. I wish films wouldn't be so heavy-handed about this kind of thing, and leave a bit of space for the ambiguities to fester
2. while we're at it, I don't want Batman's accomplices expressing horror at what he can do with his fancy cellphone gadget - they're working for *Batman*, for goodness' sake
3. I liked the look of it, but other than the chase (which otherwise I found a bit all-over-the-place) it wasn't as dark-looking as I'd hoped. I like my Gotham gothic
4. I really like the way they call him 'The Batman'
5. Heath Ledger is absolutely terrific in this. I love it when you can't tell who the actor is. Doesn't happen often, but this was one of those, like Brando in the Godfather

Ismael Klata, Thursday, 7 August 2008 22:48 (fifteen years ago) link

i enjoyed this, i agree above it's nowhere near as 'dark' as people are telling me. Our version of 'dark' might be blacker than some though i guess.

the pencil thing was better than i thought it would be.

haha i wish i hadn't known about the submarine thing, can't be sure if i would have got it or not.

This was all about joker wasn't it, not much 'batman' excitement going on really.

i didn't notice any war-on-terror, all i could see was a cool batman/joker yarn.

Ste, Thursday, 7 August 2008 23:57 (fifteen years ago) link

You didn't think "war-on-terror" when Morgan Freeman was telling Batman that his fancy pants sonar tracking system was an invasion of civil liberties?

Alex in SF, Friday, 8 August 2008 00:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I haven't read the thread to see what people are saying, but my goodness this movie was SO long. I liked the music, I think. And all the British people.

admrl, Friday, 8 August 2008 00:06 (fifteen years ago) link

That's what everyone who didn't like it said (too long, terrible final third, etc.)

Alex in SF, Friday, 8 August 2008 00:07 (fifteen years ago) link

You didn't think "war-on-terror" when Morgan Freeman was telling Batman that his fancy pants sonar tracking system was an invasion of civil liberties?

not at all

Ste, Friday, 8 August 2008 00:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Don't follow current events much do ya?

Alex in SF, Friday, 8 August 2008 00:14 (fifteen years ago) link

i apologise for not thinking the same way you do.

Ste, Friday, 8 August 2008 00:28 (fifteen years ago) link

I thought about CCTV and war-on-chavs more than war on terror. But I'm British. Oh, like the director. And many of the principle cast. The ones who aren't Australian.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 8 August 2008 07:16 (fifteen years ago) link

I was thinking more about GTA4 when Bruce was driving his lambo underneath the subway tracks, i guess it's down to what's on your mind at the time.

Ste, Friday, 8 August 2008 10:38 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry I meant to post that on the Chicago: The 10.25 Percenters thread

MPx4A, Friday, 8 August 2008 10:59 (fifteen years ago) link

nah, it works.

darraghmac, Friday, 8 August 2008 11:14 (fifteen years ago) link

This was 2/3s of a good movie (much better than B-Man Begins) and then stupid Two Face plot happens and then its completely cliche and awful for the last 45 or so minutes.

-- Alex in SF, Monday, 4 August 2008 19:12 (4 days ago) Link

still completely agree with this outlook- i'm not really interested in a director's 'vision' for the political insights his movies provides, i want to know if he made an entertaining, involving movie that didn't make me groan at any stage. the last 45 mins of this was all groan, all the time.

darraghmac, Friday, 8 August 2008 11:16 (fifteen years ago) link

i enjoyed this, i agree above it's nowhere near as 'dark' as people are telling me. Our version of 'dark' might be blacker than some though i guess.

yeah the film takes pains to honor the integrity of the joker's 'mission' as it were, partly by downplaying the sadism of his acts as much as it could (i didn't find the two boats thing as compelling as it should have been) i like that you could see the superpower of "planning shit" come to life, what a creation. the dent stuff totally swamped this movie the more that i think about it. still good.

tremendoid, Friday, 8 August 2008 11:17 (fifteen years ago) link

i saw this again (my excuse was that two friends had not seen it at all, and it was the final night it was playing in IMAX) and... it didn't seem better or worse than the first time. the narrative still started to fray into near-incoherence by the last act, the "ideas" embodied in the various speeches in said act still seemed ridiculous to me... but the IMAX segments were still stunning, the whole thing was pretty gripping, etc. etc. i liked it again. i was worried i would be bored, but i wasn't. probably will never see it again though.

EVERY MOVIE SHOULD BE SHOT IN 65MM. and projected that way. ah, a utopian dream.

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 12:31 (fifteen years ago) link

i enjoyed this, i agree above it's nowhere near as 'dark' as people are telling me. Our version of 'dark' might be blacker than some though i guess.

it's not the darkest movie ever made, but my commments were made within the context of tdk a) being a summer hollywood blockbuster, b) in the wish-fulfillment superhero genre, and c) having a strong chance of becoming the second highest grossing film ever. I don't think anyone's saying it's going to give audition or threads or straw dogs a run for their money, but for a film with huge general audience appeal it's pretty bleak and sadistic.

Edward III, Friday, 8 August 2008 14:15 (fifteen years ago) link

awesome batman moment = near the start, where he lands on top of the van from spiral car park.

Ste, Friday, 8 August 2008 14:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think anyone's saying it's going to give audition or threads or straw dogs a run for their money, but for a film with huge general audience appeal it's pretty bleak and sadistic.
Yeah, not outrageously so, but up there with Death Wish and the like.

contenderizer, Friday, 8 August 2008 16:50 (fifteen years ago) link

After finishing The Stone Killer (1973), Charles Bronson and 'Michael Winner' wanted to make another film together, and were discussing further projects. "What shall we do next?" asked Bronson. "The best script I've got is Death Wish. It's about a man whose wife and daughter are mugged and he goes out and shoots muggers," said Winner. "I'd like to do that," Bronson said. "The film?" asked Winner. Bronson replied, "No... shoot muggers."

Edward III, Friday, 8 August 2008 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link

don't think tdk is as brutal as death wish (bronson's daughter gets her ass spraypainted in that, wow 70s reality u are harsh) but it's offset in tdk because the vigilante figure is impotent and criminals call the shots for nearly the entire length of the movie.

Edward III, Friday, 8 August 2008 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

Every time I start thinking I'm an over-analytical freakshow incapable of enjoying life, I read an ILE film thread and end up feeling a lot better about myself.

HI DERE, Friday, 8 August 2008 22:21 (fifteen years ago) link

"over-analytical"

fuck you.

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 22:32 (fifteen years ago) link

btw i think this film's combo of interesting plotting that falls apart in the last act, exciting action, and alternately compelling and completely half-baked psychologizing is a pretty accurate recreation of a batman comic ca. 1970s/1980s (stopped reading them around 1990, so maybe it's been the same). that's not a criticism or a complaint.

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 22:34 (fifteen years ago) link

New York's most powerful gangster is about to get in touch with his feelings.
YOU try telling him his 50 minutes are up.
and Lisa Kudrow.

and what, Friday, 8 August 2008 22:34 (fifteen years ago) link

HI DERE, if you have a problem with one or other piece of analysis, speak your peace. but be aware that analyzing (otherwise known as "discussing") movies is fun, a way of savouring the experience of the movie. it's not anathema to pleasure.

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 22:35 (fifteen years ago) link

RIP xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 8 August 2008 22:35 (fifteen years ago) link

HI DERE, if you have a problem with one or other piece of analysis, speak your peace. but be aware that analyzing (otherwise known as "discussing") movies is fun, a way of savouring the experience of the movie. it's not anathema to pleasure.

-- amateurist, Friday, August 8, 2008 10:35 PM (43 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

I think he engaged pretty effectively upthread!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 8 August 2008 22:36 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry, there are sections of the thread i haven't read

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 22:52 (fifteen years ago) link

My post was specifically spurred by darraghmac's "there is no point to discussing this movie" post, which I found fatuous and unthinking. It made me feel like I wasn't being as fatuous and overthinking as I was afraid I was being.

I do have the impression that people who out-and-out HATED this movie have sensibilities so different from mine that I might was well consider them to be chihuahuas in human form, though.

HI DERE, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:03 (fifteen years ago) link

also lol at amateurist getting mad at me calling myself "over-analytical"

HI DERE, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:04 (fifteen years ago) link

i misread -- i thought you were accusing others of being over-analytical. i'm really sorry.

p.s. http://images.bestwebbuys.com/muze/books/21/9780740706721.jpg

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Watched Batman Begins again last night. Good. Not as good as this, though.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:11 (fifteen years ago) link

The Dark Knight or the Ebert/chihuahua "feud"?

HI DERE, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Both. Wasn't it the chihuahua that bit Batman's arm?

Also, say chihuahua phonetically, as loud as you can. I dare you.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:13 (fifteen years ago) link

i watched Silent Night, Deadly Night last night. omfg

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:14 (fifteen years ago) link

I find people who say "There's nothing to discuss here" a thousand times more tolerable than those who go "WHY ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THIGNS ITS A MOVIE SHUT UP"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Like "I've parsed the ideas here and think they're not worth talking about" is way more interesting to me than "Y U RUIN IT WITH YOUR ANALYZING"

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh come on. That complaint came up because people were whining that this movie was nonstop Bush apologia, which I personally think is such nonsense that it makes think the people saying it are dumber than I know they are.

HI DERE, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:18 (fifteen years ago) link

after 300 I think a lot of people are now actively seeking out these Bush motifs.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:20 (fifteen years ago) link

whereas they were warranted there

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:20 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah, it is nonsense. film is incoherent, partly deliberately (in the way that all blockbusters have a degree of incoherence) and partly out of intellectual cowardice and confusion.

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:20 (fifteen years ago) link

i still liked it well enough.

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:20 (fifteen years ago) link

wtf why can't I type

I didn't think the movie was incoherent outside of the "who was Batman trying to save" thing, which was obviously intentional but, having only seen it once, I don't know that I can say that I got what the intention was (ie, was Batman telling Gordon to go after Rachel or did the Joker do a switcheroo?).

HI DERE, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:23 (fifteen years ago) link

incoherent w/r/t having a particular POV or w/r/t not being able to understand what was going on?

omar little, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:23 (fifteen years ago) link

batman went to the address the joker claimed rachel was at

omar little, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh come on. That complaint came up because people were whining that this movie was nonstop Bush apologia, which I personally think is such nonsense that it makes think the people saying it are dumber than I know they are.

-- HI DERE, Friday, August 8, 2008 11:18 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Sure, I wouldn't suggest that it is some kind of "nonstop apologia" by any means. I think it's clear that Nolan is after some War on Terror resonance, though, and as such (intentionally or not) you can read the movie as a somewhat stretched allegory.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:27 (fifteen years ago) link

incoherent politically (incoherent as allegory). narrative incoherence was not too much of a problem, though they did botch the stuff you're talking about and didn't spend enough time establishing what was going on w/the barges (which was the worst part of the movie anyhow)

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:29 (fifteen years ago) link

joker's behavior made little sense insofar as his omnipotence/omniscience beggared belief, though i guess that's a staple of the genre. for instance if he was after harvey dent during that (admittedly spectacular) car chase, why was it revealed immediately after that he "deliberately" had himself locked up in police hq? so he could get himself out again?

but lots of blockbusters don't withstand this type of narrative scrutiny.

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:31 (fifteen years ago) link

i think the war-on-terror stuff was thrown in, in part at least, as critic bait. not cynically--i'm sure nolan thinks he is tackling big issues, since he's a director that obviously takes himself reasonably seriously and is not inclined to admit to making escapist films--but just the same.... i think critics who take strong positions concerning the film's political POV are giving it too much credit (or maybe not enough credit for slipperiness).

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:33 (fifteen years ago) link

the thing is, the moral dilemma supposedly debated by batman and lucius fox (what a blaxploitation name--guess the character was invented in the 70s so it figures) is sort of mooted by the prereogatives of the genre whereby the superhero is defined by his essential goodness. whereas IRL there's no politician that we can trust, almost by definition, in this way. i would argue, therefore, that the context makes the allegory (as ambivalent and incoherent as it is) useless. i would also argue that anyone who truly disagrees has a very dim view of the film's audience--people know what the moral polarities of these films are, and know that they don't apply to the real world. except, maybe, little children (who shouldn't be seeing this film) and sociopaths.

amateurist, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:39 (fifteen years ago) link

the moral dilemma supposedly debated by batman and lucius fox is sort of mooted by the prereogatives of the genre whereby the superhero is defined by his essential goodness

that's the point of this series, though: ala miller, it's muddying the waters re: the "hero's" essential goodness. like kenan said upthread (he was speaking more generally, but I think this holds especially true in regards to Bale's Batman): "Bruce Wayne is Patrick Bateman

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 8 August 2008 23:59 (fifteen years ago) link

wow hang on

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:00 (fifteen years ago) link

that's the point of this series, though

but it doesn't convincingly challenge this trope at all! it merely sort of scribbles around it.

amateurist, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:00 (fifteen years ago) link

and why it should want to challenge it, i honestly don't know for certain. maybe nolan wants to make a "real" movie about a nearly omnipotent vigilante who runs around in tights? seems like he's barking up the wrong tree, and anyways he's not up to it.

amateurist, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:02 (fifteen years ago) link

let's try that again:

the moral dilemma supposedly debated by batman and lucius fox is sort of mooted by the prereogatives of the genre whereby the superhero is defined by his essential goodness

I think that's part of the point of this series, though: ala miller, it's muddying the waters re: the "hero's" essential goodness. Kenan made a useful point upthread to the effect that this Bruce Wayne is essentially Patrick Bateman: a psychically scarred rich kid who, instead of beheading women, dresses up like a Bat and beats up criminals. More laudable than the former, certainly, but the "darker" Batmans of Miller/Nolan question the validity of vigilante violence to a much greater degree, and as such they're questioning the purported essential goodness of their "hero" too.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:04 (fifteen years ago) link

bah you've responded to my malformed post lol sorry

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:05 (fifteen years ago) link

they're challenging (mildly, and not convincingly) his efficacy, not his goodness

amateurist, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:06 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean he becomes a CHRIST FIGURE at the end of the film for fuck's sake

amateurist, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:06 (fifteen years ago) link

the entire point behind Batman's character is that he is a "good guy" in the loosest sense of the word; the books and cartoons have been talking about the razor-thin line that separates him from the people he's chasing almost his entire existence. He is ostensibly a "good guy" but clearly one cast as crazy as the people he's hunting down. You're right in the sense that Bruce's moral compass is the focal point for his craziness so it's highly unlikely that he's going to go on a murderous rampage. There is a while lot of evil, fucked up shit you can do before you get to the murderous rampage part and most of the movie revolves around The Joker tempting him down that path time and time again.

Also, The Joker positioned himself in the jail so that he'd have the opportunity to take out the Hong Kong dude. It's not wholly realistic that he'd be that successful at manipulating people but that'ns a stylistic choice I enjoyed.

HI DERE, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:15 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't really think they presented bruce/batman as being a sociopath, or at least all the familiar structures of identification/projection were in place with him and there was never ever any real doubt as to the enormous gulf separating him from the joker. i guess i feel like the genre's prerogatives just subvert even the hardiest attempts to create significant ambiguity on this count. (this was true of nearly all of the "revisionist" comics by moore, miller, et al as well.)

amateurist, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:20 (fifteen years ago) link

and honestly this was hardly a hardy attempt.

maybe i just wasn't attuned to what the film was trying to do, dramatically, with the wayne/batman character. but i feel that the attempts at moral shading were largely manifested in the rather unconvingly little monologues periodically delivered by major characters, but weren't truly embedded in the plot dynamics, therefore they didn't feel very essential or convincing.

amateurist, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:22 (fifteen years ago) link

sorry for poor word choice, bad grammar, typos, etc.

amateurist, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:23 (fifteen years ago) link

otm xp

tremendoid, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:24 (fifteen years ago) link

fwiw I thought the monologues were terribly grating and not even especially well written

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 9 August 2008 00:59 (fifteen years ago) link

People keep calling the film incoherent and I don't understand what they mean because I don't think I misunderstood anything in the film? Like, Gordon asks Batman "who are you going for?" re; Rachel / Dent, and Batman says "Rachel", and Gordon gives his men the address the Joker gave for Dent; what's to misunderstand?

Re; Joker's omniscience; he's a very clever guy who's spent six months rigging the city and positioning himself so he can get 'a date' with Batman and drive the city mental while doing it. Yes, it's a film with realist overtones in many ways, but it's still about sociopathic ninjas and evil genius psychopaths; The Joker has pretty much always been painted as an evil schemer and mastermind in the comics, it's how he works; he sets up traps and lets people walk into them. The kerfuffle with the hospital generator and the failure of the ferries to blow up show that not all his plans always work. I also think the cellphone-stomach guy is probably just one of many devices Joker put into play "just in case".

I can't say any of the monologues bothered me, apart from Gordon's very last speech over the montage, which contained two heroic allegories too many. If you want amazing realist dialogue, watch a Mike Leigh film; THIS is a comicbook movie where people blow shit up and debate BIG MORAL DILEMMAS.

Re: Bruce as sociopath - maybe not in classic terms but HE DRESSES AS A BAT AND NINJAS FUCK OUT OF PEOPLE WITH NARY A THOUGHT FOR WHY THEY'RE BEING BAD, and then justifies it by pretending he's cleaning the city up which HE MOST ASSUREDLY IS NOT and that failure to do so, in fact that inspiration of escalation in criminal behaviour, is what the whole film is about; I personally cannot think of much more sociopathic behaviour. Isabelle Huppert putting broken glass in a piano prodigy's pocket and having rape-sex with younger men? That's also fucked up, but in a different way.

THIS FILM IS NOT A REALIST FILM. IT IS A FANTASTICAL ACTION-DRAMA WITH (for many of us) ENOUGH QUASI-CONVINCING EMOTIONAL / MORAL MOTIVATIONS THAT IT TRANSCENDS BEING DIE HARD 4.0. It's as realistic as 24 is.

Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 9 August 2008 06:23 (fifteen years ago) link

WITH NARY A THOUGHT FOR WHY THEY'RE BEING BAD

I remember the batman interrupting and chastising harvey dent when he's interrogating one of the joker's henchmen after the assassination attempt on the mayor and saying just quit it because he's from arkham and is mental

conrad, Saturday, 9 August 2008 08:23 (fifteen years ago) link

I think what Nolan's set up in Begins and hammers home in TDK is that Batman is naive and deluded and that the people in his life tolerate it because he pays them money. (notice: Fox and Alfred aid & abet Batman, they are on his payroll; Rachel disapproves, she has her own job)

Dr. Superman, Saturday, 9 August 2008 08:49 (fifteen years ago) link

The Dent / Arkham nutter scenario is about the only one, and it's also more about not killing him (or anyone) (and especially not leaving justice to chance) than it is about not pummeling the shit outta him with fists.

Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 9 August 2008 08:59 (fifteen years ago) link

don't forget in Batman Begins, not too long before he became a vigilante hero, Bruce Wayne was standing in a courthouse ready to shoot Chill in broad daylight.

he seems to still be searching for an identity, after all, it was Rachel Dawes scolding and slapping him that sort of forced him to see the error of his ways, and then he put thousands of motorists in danger just to save Rachel towards the end.

and he does seem to be somewhat careless and cavalier about what he blows up. woulda been interesting to see a Hancock markup on the movie.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 9 August 2008 15:18 (fifteen years ago) link

"MY HYBRID PRIUS!!!11 YOU BASTARD!"

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 9 August 2008 15:19 (fifteen years ago) link

THIS is a comicbook movie where people blow shit up and debate BIG MORAL DILEMMAS.

right. but, contrary to your mike-leigh-fan strawman, some of us just didn't think it was a particularly good or well-executed comic-book movie where people blow shit up and debate big moral dilemmas. i get the feeling you can't understand how anyone could take the movie on its own pop-pulp comic-book terms and still not love it, but i guess you just have to take my word for it that it's true.

tipsy mothra, Saturday, 9 August 2008 16:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Which comic book movies with exploding shit and big moral dilemma debates do it better? Cos I haven't seen one I've enjoyed more.

Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 9 August 2008 17:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Superman 3

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 9 August 2008 17:58 (fifteen years ago) link

for the record amateurist is over-analytical as hell

cankles, Saturday, 9 August 2008 18:05 (fifteen years ago) link

i liked x-men 2 a lot, both on its own and in terms of capturing the tone and moral themes of the comics. i don't remember if the crow had any big moral dilemmas, but it definitely blew a lot of things up and i enjoyed more than the bale batmans.

people in having different opinions shocker...

tipsy mothra, Saturday, 9 August 2008 18:19 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't remember if the crow had any big moral dilemmas

Did have a dead guy in clown makeup, though.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 9 August 2008 18:25 (fifteen years ago) link

My post was specifically spurred by darraghmac's "there is no point to discussing this movie" post, which I found fatuous and unthinking

i don't think i've made any such post- i've been discussing the movie for the past week with everyone else on here, so you've either confused me with someone or misread me.

darraghmac, Saturday, 9 August 2008 18:32 (fifteen years ago) link

and, as far as summer blockbuster/superhero movies go, it's certainly had a lot worth discussing, so i really don't know where you've gotten that from.

darraghmac, Saturday, 9 August 2008 18:33 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't find Mike Leigh's dialogue particularly "realistic."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 9 August 2008 18:44 (fifteen years ago) link

You're American!

Scik Mouthy, Saturday, 9 August 2008 19:04 (fifteen years ago) link

the prereogatives of the genre whereby the superhero is defined by his essential goodness

Ok, this is absolute nonsense. Maybe, MAYBE if you're limiting it strictly to "major studio, major publisher comic book movies," but outside of that, it's so far off the mark as to be laughable. Seek ye one Wolferine for starters.

Pancakes Hackman, Saturday, 9 August 2008 20:45 (fifteen years ago) link

People keep calling the film incoherent and I don't understand what they mean because I don't think I misunderstood anything in the film.
I called The Dark Knight "narratively incoherent", but I don't mean that it's hard to understand. I mean that it's badly structured. Plot = the action of a story; Narrative = the storytelling grammar that holds the plot together. The side trip to Hong Kong, for instance, was narratively unnecessary. It may or may not have been essential to the plot, but it made the storytelling seem senseless and disorganized.

contenderizer, Saturday, 9 August 2008 23:58 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't notice than when the Joker is shooting at the police convoy from the truck, the truck has the slogan "laughter is the best medicine" on it, but the Joker has drawn a big red S so that it says "Slaughter is the best medicine" instead

also Dent was using the double sided coin and saying "tails you die" to the schizophrenic guy, so he was never actually going to kill him

MPx4A, Sunday, 10 August 2008 12:08 (fifteen years ago) link

So the early word is that it's *still* at number one in America. And sometime in the next few days it'll beat Burton's Batman in inflation-adjusted numbers.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 10 August 2008 16:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually there are apparently a couple of books like this out there that reinterpret certain scenes. Dear me. I wonder what the pencil trick turns into.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 10 August 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

crayon trick?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 10 August 2008 19:52 (fifteen years ago) link

seriously though, the clown mask on the right looks similar to the one The JOker wore in the bank robbery.

DETAILS, FUCKERS, DETAILS!

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Sunday, 10 August 2008 19:52 (fifteen years ago) link

The Dent / Arkham nutter scenario is about the only one, and it's also more about not killing him (or anyone) (and especially not leaving justice to chance) than it is about not pummeling the shit outta him with fists.

I thought it was also as much a "because if you're seen to be killing a schizophrenic how;'s that gonna make you look, dumbass?", for whatever self serving purpose that might have implied.

I liked this film and I'm really not into the franchise. It was relentlessly loud and blammy and a lot happened and it was suprisingly long but I had little to complain about. Except maybe the "he's the darko knight" monologue at the end, which felt just a little glurgey.

Trayce, Sunday, 10 August 2008 23:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Hahah the darko knight? Amusing typo.

Trayce, Sunday, 10 August 2008 23:58 (fifteen years ago) link

He takes the mask off and it's really Jake! Incest! Almost.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Frightening.

Trayce, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:13 (fifteen years ago) link

I WISH it was Jake.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Actually he'd make an interesting Batman.

Trayce, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Nah, substitute Jake for Maggie and having Christian Bale and Aaron Eckhart fighting over Richard Dawes's affections.

"He was going to WAIT for me, Alfred."

"That's what they all say, sir."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:18 (fifteen years ago) link

I would never tolerate Jake talking to me about another guy.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:19 (fifteen years ago) link

In this case it would have been Christian.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Talking to you that is.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Brokeback Gotham.

actually Jake G was the frontrunner to play Batman before Bale got involved. what could have been etc...

Roz, Monday, 11 August 2008 00:40 (fifteen years ago) link

he's great at almost being superheroes, what with his almost Spiderman

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Monday, 11 August 2008 01:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Fuck it, let's just have Jake play Robin in the next film and make that age-old homosexual subtext totally and utterly fucking overt.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 11 August 2008 07:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Too lazy to read the whole 2500 post thread, so I'm just gonna jump in and say: his was a GREAT thriller, is already at #3 for US box office of all time at $442K (could surpass Stars Wars' #2 if it cracks $461K - which it will, even if it doesn't surpass Titanic's $600K)... and oh-so-significant: is #1 on The IMBD Top 250 already due to the fanboys haha.

That's all you really need to know, and if you didn't like it you're gonna be on the wrong side of history (as you're going to keep hearing about this goddamned "little comic book" for a long time to come - especially with the Heath Factor).

But this drives me nuts - apologies if it's been discussed upthread -

http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB121694247343482821.html

Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 11 August 2008 11:52 (fifteen years ago) link

*this not his

Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 11 August 2008 11:53 (fifteen years ago) link

Worrying that F Miller has the let's-kick-Islamic-terrorist's-ass outlook on rumored sequel, but he did write 300 after all. Ugh

Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 11 August 2008 11:54 (fifteen years ago) link

I direct you, and anyone else with a Batman = Bush tizzy going on, in either direction, here - http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/010555.html

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 11 August 2008 11:56 (fifteen years ago) link


Radcliffe Joker-casting rumors for Batman Begins 2 start NOW

-- latebloomer (posercore24...), July 28th, 2006 3:09 PM. (latebloomer)

-- the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:37 (2 years ago) Link

hmm?

darraghmac, Monday, 11 August 2008 12:28 (fifteen years ago) link

Thx Scik Mouth - " What neocon readings of the film must overlook is that this is exactly the same in geopolitical reality: far from being unpalatable but necessary, the Iraq misadventure, Guantanamo Bay, extraordinary rendition etc have either achieved no results or made things worse."

Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 11 August 2008 12:48 (fifteen years ago) link

if Heef hadn't died they could've been on some Killing Joke shit in the next one with Batman in Arkham desperately trying to convince the Joker to call a truce before they kill each other

MPx4A, Monday, 11 August 2008 12:54 (fifteen years ago) link

That's all you really need to know, and if you didn't like it you're gonna be on the wrong side of history

but this is a comfort!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Either you're with us or against us@@@!

Anyway all of this isn't just "comib book fantasy" anymore m' lads, all superhero powers are becoming TEH REAL THANG:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26128485/

Scientists closing in on invisibility cloak
Using artificially engineered materials to redirect light around objects
The Associated Press
updated 6:48 p.m. PT, Sun., Aug. 10, 2008

WASHINGTON - Scientists say they are a step closer to developing materials that could render people and objects invisible.

Researchers have demonstrated for the first time that they were able to cloak three-dimensional objects using artificially engineered materials that redirect light around the objects. Previously, they only have been able to cloak very thin two-dimensional objects.

The findings, by scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, led by Xiang Zhang, are to be released later this week in the journals Nature and Science.

The new work moves scientists a step closer to hiding people and objects from visible light, which could have broad applications, including military ones.

People can see objects because they scatter the light that strikes them, reflecting some of it back to the eye. Cloaking uses materials, known as metamaterials, to deflect radar, light or other waves around an object, like water flowing around a smooth rock in a stream.

Metamaterials are mixtures of metal and circuit board materials such as ceramic, Teflon or fiber composite. They are designed to bend visible light in a way that ordinary materials don't. Scientists are trying to use them to bend light around objects so they don't create reflections or shadows.

It differs from stealth technology, which does not make an aircraft invisible but reduces the cross-section available to radar, making it hard to track.

The research was funded in part by the U.S. Army Research Office and the National Science Foundation's Nano-Scale Science and Engineering Center.

Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:21 (fifteen years ago) link

still don't understand how that works

Ste, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:25 (fifteen years ago) link

that kpunk article is smarter than the wsj piece, but almost as hapless. there is not a moral or ideological through-line in the movie. the total-information system is the best example: this is awful! yes, but just this once! well, ok! like a lot of things (see also the superficial debates over torture) it gives the film a little political buzz (ripped from the headlines!) without saying anything much.

and the idea that people need a HERO to believe in regardless of the truth, if it makes me think of anything, makes me think of pat tillman and jessica lynch. except the movie presents it with a straight face, without bothering to wonder if it even makes moral sense (it doesn't). that conceit mostly exists in order to make batman's "sacrifice" seem necessary and bold rather than like the masochistic martyrdom-seeking gobbledygook it is.

xpost: but i would like one invisibility cloak, please.

but mostly i don't see a lot of upside in subjecting the movie to those kinds of analyses, because its ideas -- such as they are -- can't stand up to it.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:33 (fifteen years ago) link

agreed w/ gypsy moth that there is no consistent ideology that's evoked by the film. but i mostly liked how the k-punk article is just refuting Klavan's self-pitying claims in the first place. Since let's face it: douchebag has a new book out and what better way to promote it than a) concoct this pseudo-grand-narrative of Hollywood's egregiously unjust "grey-listing" of conservatives (with the obligatory appearances on O'Reilly & Glenn Beck) and b) playing to his retrograde fanbase by stealing headlines and slapping them onto the biggest block-buster of the decade? see also here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/08/AR2008080802876_pf.html

Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:44 (fifteen years ago) link

or rather, i should say that was *my* favorite part of the k-punk article. i can't vouch for its veracity or effectiveness in subjecting the poor film to a post-Kantian analysis or reading ....which is what the rest of the post tried to do. i think.

Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 11 August 2008 13:46 (fifteen years ago) link

that conceit mostly exists in order to make batman's "sacrifice" seem necessary and bold rather than like the masochistic martyrdom-seeking gobbledygook it is.

maybe. but i've realized that probably the best way to take the final scene is in the context of the conversation about caesar very early in the movie. it's batman's "george washington" moment, giving up power for the sake of the system that he wants to support.

I said it upthread, but one of the best ways to understand the movie (and, im finding, the last 3 decades of the comic books) is through the motifs of the Western--in fact i'd say something like The Searchers is a direct influence on the movie. Like, say, when John Wayne scalps an indian.

so one thing i keep feeling when i think about this movie is that yes the war on terror stuff seems like window-dressing because it IS, it's just placing old narratives in a new box. but these are extremely powerful ideas and they've been around for a while.

ryan, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Superhero movies are TOTALLY Westerns in terms of pop-cult theory narrative structure, etc.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:06 (fifteen years ago) link

sure but i think say the searchers and unforgiven and red river have actual moral structures -- they really weigh questions of revenge, violence, loyalty, etc. in a coherent and complicated way. the conflicts are made palpable in the writing, the performances and the filmmaking. i heard some talk about those things in the nolans' clunky dialogue, but they weren't delivered on in the structure of the story or the strength of the performances. the only strong performance in the movie is ledger's, and he doesn't really present any moral quandaries at all, he just dances through and above them.

well, except for the ferryboat scene, which is like i said i think is the best section of the movie in terms of building moral tension. it's gimmicky, but it's handled pretty well. (it doesn't really fit into the movie's larger framework, though, its idea that either harvey dent or batman has galvanized the city into a new sense of moral possibility. instead it plays on the old idea of a fundamental decency that will always defeat an anti-moral force like the joker etc etc. if anything it makes a case that the city doesn't need a hero -- a potentially interesting idea that is of course just left dangling because the only real point of the scene is to give tick-tock tension.)

tipsy mothra, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Well, actually I think the film(s) do(es) make that point, that Gotham doens't need a hero; that's kind of explicitly what Batman begins is about - Ra's Al Ghul thinks it needs raising to the ground, Wayne thinks it needs saving. And by the end of TDK, Batman and Gordon agree that, in the absence of Dent's hero, the city needs a villain, which Batman becomes. And the whole idea of escalation raises the idea of whether Gotham needs a hero - it certainly suggests it doesn't need one like Batman.

I'm wondering if the (Nolan) Batman films raise moral questions but don't provide answers, don't really judge the characters' actions, but instead leave the audience to judge.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:40 (fifteen years ago) link

Not necessarily immediate relevant but this 2005 interview with Nolan is one of the best I've read from him and, in light of where TDK ended up, of interest.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:42 (fifteen years ago) link

That's pretty much how I view it; the film isn't trying to give an answer.

if anything it makes a case that the city doesn't need a hero -- a potentially interesting idea that is of course just left dangling because the only real point of the scene is to give tick-tock tension.

If you want to get nitpicky about it, the point of that scene is to create a massively huge diversion for Harvey.

HI DERE, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:43 (fifteen years ago) link

I read that Nolan interview Ned just linked sometime last week - it is indeed fascinating.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 11 August 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link

And the whole idea of escalation raises the idea of whether Gotham needs a hero - it certainly suggests it doesn't need one like Batman.

well it says it needs one like harvey, or like the fake harvey batman and gordon invent through their deception. a martyr, basically. except really it's presenting 2 martyrs, since batman martyrs himself (morally at least) to preserve the fiction of dent's martyrdom. that's a whole lotta martyring, and some pretty tortured moral logic to make it seem somehow necessary.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 11 August 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Radcliffe Joker-casting rumors for Batman Begins 2 start NOW

-- latebloomer (posercore24...), July 28th, 2006 3:09 PM. (latebloomer)

-- the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:37 (2 years ago) Link

hmm?

-- darraghmac, Monday, August 11, 2008 12:28 PM (4 hours ag

ya don't think he looks joker-like here?

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41939000/jpg/_41939536_radcliffe2_bodygetty.jpg

latebloomer, Monday, 11 August 2008 16:53 (fifteen years ago) link

i liked this line from mr. k-punk:

Secondly, what [the right wing] readings also miss is the actual nature of the model of virtue presented in the film. If this is (neo)conservative, it is not at the simple level of utilitarian calculation of consequences. What we are dealing with is a far more complicated Straussian meta-utilitarianism whose cynical reasoning is akin to that of Dostoyevsky's Grand Inquisitor. Deception - of the masses by the elite - is integral to this account of virtue: what is 'protected' is not the masses' security but their belief (in Harvey Dent's campaign).

goole, Monday, 11 August 2008 17:39 (fifteen years ago) link

well it says it needs one like harvey, or like the fake harvey batman and gordon invent through their deception. a martyr, basically. except really it's presenting 2 martyrs, since batman martyrs himself (morally at least) to preserve the fiction of dent's martyrdom. that's a whole lotta martyring, and some pretty tortured moral logic to make it seem somehow necessary.

Bruce and Gordon say that Gotham needs a hero like fake Harvey; the movie spends a good amount of time showing the audience that Bruce and Gordon don't actually know all that much about the man they're championing (Gordon's disagreement with Dent's judgment about the crooked cops on Gordon's staff; Batman's misjudgment about Dent's willingness to kill the crazy henchmen). Also, the movie itself takes a lot of time to show Harvey as a man whose judgment is by and large dead on about pretty much everything wrong with the current state of affairs in Gotham, then proceeds to slap him down about as hard as you can imagine.

If the movie is saying anything, I think it's asking "Is it too late to save Gotham?" Obviously Batman doesn't think so but I don't know that we're automatically supposed to agree with him.

HI DERE, Monday, 11 August 2008 17:58 (fifteen years ago) link

What we are dealing with is a far more complicated Straussian meta-utilitarianism whose cynical reasoning is akin to that of Dostoyevsky's Grand Inquisitor.

yes totally. I tried to say this upthread in a halting and half thought-out way.

ryan, Monday, 11 August 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, Dent's position is interesting - Dent wants to be Batman, to be the romantic, masculine, fighting hero; neither Batman nor Gordon will let him be that, though. The snap of bravado when he punches the guy in the dock, the quick soundbite machismo, the claiming to be Batman...

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, simultaneously the greatest and creepiest thing ever -- especially since in light of an earlier discussion on this thread the post contains the words "Woulda been interesting to see these guys re-enact the infamous “pencil scene” with a Crayola..."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Deception - of the masses by the elite - is integral to this account of virtue: what is 'protected' is not the masses' security but their belief (in Harvey Dent's campaign).

-- goole

Within what we take to be the film's own moral POV, are Batman and Gordon in any sense right that Dent has value to the citizens of Gotham? Does the city really need him? We could just as easily argue that Batman and Gordon believe they need Dent. They seem almost desperate/delusional in their certainty that Dent (even a properly promoted image of Dent) can relieving them of the burden of social salvation. Perhaps they merely project this need onto the city as a whole.

contenderizer, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Speaking of morality, a writer at Human Events is not pleased:

Some people defend Dark Knight because it is smashing box office records. So what? Crack cocaine is popular too, but that doesn’t mean it’s good for society.

Others defend Dark Knight for its “conservative” values. It does acknowledge the difference between good and evil. The hero stands up to the villain, subdues him in the end, and takes the blame for the district attorney’s crimes to preserve hope in Gotham City. The movie also sends a constructive topical message about the need to defend ourselves against terrorists.

These points may be true, but the defense rings hollow. It smacks of making excuses for enjoying the movie. How can we justify Dark Knight’s indulgence in the pornography of violence? What if Hugh Hefner made a movie featuring two hours of skin and sex, but ending with the hero losing his marriage? Would Hefner deserve credit for warning us of the dangers of adultery?

Dark Knight is rated PG-13, compelling evidence of the inadequacy of the present rating system. This movie is a pleasure cruise through the depths of moral perversion. It cries out for a new category: U-99, Unfit for any age.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Within what we take to be the film's own moral POV, are Batman and Gordon in any sense right that Dent has value to the citizens of Gotham? Does the city really need him? We could just as easily argue that Batman and Gordon believe they need Dent.

I thought that was the ultimate point of the movie.

HI DERE, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:52 (fifteen years ago) link

hey just to be clear i'm quoting someone up there

goole, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I thought that was the ultimate point of the movie.

-- HI DERE

I don't think the film's very clear on that point -- whether Batman & Gordon are in fact right about Gotham's "need" for a symbol like Dent.

contenderizer, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think it's trying to say whether B&G are "right" or "wrong", so you're right in that it isn't very clear on that point.

HI DERE, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:57 (fifteen years ago) link

You get where individual characters stand on the state of the city and what needs to be done but the film itself doesn't really make a grand pronouncement about what the "correct" answer should be (depending on how much weight you give Gordon's last monologue, of course).

HI DERE, Monday, 11 August 2008 20:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, goofs:

The recent Batman sequel "The Dark Knight" is affecting audiences in more ways than one.

Some playing cards turned up at the Walmart in Pearisburg over the weekend. They had threatening messages on them, implying nine people will soon die.

Bryan Eugene Stafford and Justin Colby Dirico, both 18, were arrested Tuesday and charged with conspiracy to commit an act of terrorism.

They reportedly confessed, saying it was a practical joke inspired by the new Batman movie.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 00:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think it's trying to say whether B&G are "right" or "wrong"

which isn't far from saying it doesn't have a point of view at all. which maybe can be read as complex, but i just read as confused.

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 00:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Am sick of people going 'why so serious?' to me when I admit I haven't yet seen the film. Will start being violent.

VeronaInTheClub, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 00:38 (fifteen years ago) link

a film that allows its audience to make a moral decision! heavens! xp

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 01:07 (fifteen years ago) link

I kind of don't need a Batman movie to tell me what is right and what is wrong.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 12:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman the Joker Slayer

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 15:15 (fifteen years ago) link

And as another example of shoehorning in something popular to talk about one's own preferred field:

I’m sure you’ve all heard about the new Batman movie, “The Dark Knight.” I saw it with my kids while on vacation and I can report without giving away the story that there’s definitely trouble in Gotham City. The Joker is the most malevolent character I’ve seen in a lo-o-o-o-n-g time. He’s the most ruthless enemy Batman’s ever faced. It’s a good thing that a considerable chunk of Bruce Wayne’s fortune is secretly being diverted in order to fund Batman’s private weapons development program. The tools they come up with are astounding — powerful, technologically advanced and very, very effective.

As I watched the story unfold, I realized that it paralleled what’s happening in the residential mortgage industry.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 15:18 (fifteen years ago) link

haha what

sleep, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 15:29 (fifteen years ago) link

that is some serious shoehorning

sleep, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 15:30 (fifteen years ago) link

Okay that's kind of impressive

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 15:31 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think it's trying to say whether B&G are "right" or "wrong", so you're right in that it isn't very clear on that point.

-- HI DERE

which isn't far from saying it doesn't have a point of view at all. which maybe can be read as complex, but i just read as confused.

-- tipsy mothra

tipsy OTM. The film raises some interesting questions, but then just sort of mushes them around in a seemingly arbitrary fashion. I don't see any great complexity in the film's moral ambiguity regarding the actions and motivations its ostensible heroes; on this point The Dark Knight does seem more confused than nuanced.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

When did complexity become a necessary component of ambiguity?

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link

The film's political implications are similarly half-baked. They're clearly there, but they don't quite work, and I suspect that's why there's been so much debate on this point.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that, since anyone watching the movie can basically read whatever agenda they want to into it, the political implications worked pretty well.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

What HI DERE said. This film's been claimed by EVERYBODY now.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Complexity is not necessarily a component of ambiguity, as this film demonstrates. Complexity is, however, often a component of intersting, and it's tempting to imagine that there's something intellectually compelling hiding behind The Dark Knight's mumble-mumble nonsense.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:17 (fifteen years ago) link

What HI DERE said. This film's been claimed by EVERYBODY now.

-- Ned Raggett

Are we most satisfied when we say that nothing means anything, so just sit back and enjoy it?

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm most satisfied when my entertainment doesn't hector me with a moral.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Is to seriosly engage with moral questions necessarily to "hector"?

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

but the MORTGAGES dan, it's all so CLEAR

goole, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

lol

Contenderizer, what you wanted out of the movie is hectoring. You wanted the movie to take a strong moral stance on the actions that occurred within it, unambiguously saying, "This is right, and this is wrong." Instead, the movie said, "This is what happened," and, for whatever reason, you are dissatisfied by that.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.solarnavigator.net/images/troy_achilles_brad_pitt.jpg

"HECTORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!"

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link

Contenderizer, what you wanted out of the movie is hectoring. You wanted the movie to take a strong moral stance on the actions that occurred within it, unambiguously saying, "This is right, and this is wrong." Instead, the movie said, "This is what happened," and, for whatever reason, you are dissatisfied by that.
I didn't necessarily want the film to take "a strong moral stance", but I did want it to seriously engage with the issues it raises (or pretends to raise). I suspect that one of the reasons it reads reasonably well as a semi-sympathetic apology for the abuses of the Bush admin. is that the screenplay cynically tears certain elements from contemporary headlines without quite thinking them through. Same goes for questions regarding Batman's ultimate culpability and/or the real value of symbols like Batman and Harvey Dent. These ideas are tossed out and tossed around, but they aren't particularly well developed, and as a result, the film implies a lot without seeming to know what it's trying to say. In other words, the film tries hard to imply that it really does have a strong point of view, but in fact doesn't. The implication of moral/intellectual seriousness is just a pose, like the pose of "gritty realism" that justifies the film's brutality. I find that disappointing, and given the issues the film is toying with, even a bit cowardly.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:42 (fifteen years ago) link

the screenplay cynically tears certain elements from contemporary headlines without quite thinking them through

Every new episode of Law and Order must give you a freakin' conniption fit, then.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Dick Wolf's Batman

omar little, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:46 (fifteen years ago) link

DUN DUN DUN

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:47 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think the movie tries to have a point of view at all!

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:48 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm with contenderizer here, but I'm busy now with a ham and salami sandwich.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:48 (fifteen years ago) link

"In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the police, who investigate crime; and the district attorneys, who prosecute the offenders. Also, Batman."

(multi-xpost)

bernard snowy, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:49 (fifteen years ago) link

i think you're conflating 'thinking through' with 'having a definite answer'

max, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:49 (fifteen years ago) link

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/7475/1200343179086vc1.jpg

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:50 (fifteen years ago) link

loling at Batman working the courtroom as lawyer in full getup. defense attorney would be Unfrozen Caveman, obv.

Granny Dainger, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:51 (fifteen years ago) link

no wait he's wearing a suit but still has mask and cape on

Granny Dainger, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I want to see this happen.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:52 (fifteen years ago) link

And Dan, where did you find that!

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:53 (fifteen years ago) link

I was gonna ask the same thing. The internet giveth...

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:54 (fifteen years ago) link

It's been posted on ILX before! I just googled it.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link

ned you spend way too much time on the internet to never have seen that before

max, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Too late, guys.

http://blog.capcom.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/harvey.jpg

Pancakes Hackman, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link

bah was going to make the same comment

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link

hahahahaha!
xpost

Granny Dainger, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link

max, I might well have done but I just don't remember it. (Trust me, my L&O ref had nothing to do with suddenly recalling that image!)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:56 (fifteen years ago) link

not looking forward to the inevitable SVU spin-off, though

bernard snowy, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Paul Sorvino as Alfred

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Seriously bored of the "pretending to raise moral issues" schtick now.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 19:04 (fifteen years ago) link

A.O. Scott: Instead the disappointment comes from the way the picture spells out lofty, serious themes and then ... spells them out again. What kind of hero do we need? Where is the line between justice and vengeance? How much autonomy should we sacrifice in the name of security? Is the taking of innocent life ever justified? These are all fascinating, even urgent questions, but stating them, as nearly every character in “The Dark Knight” does, sooner of later, is not the same as exploring them.

Scott's point is a good one, that the conventions of the superhero movie prevent TDK from really engaging these questions because the questions are raised in a structure designed to say SOMETHING ELSE.

Well, it would be a good point if he didn't forget about the Dostoevskyian ending...I don't think the movie ends ambiguously (we know exactly what happens and why) and i dont think it is incoherent because it's quite obviously forcing the themes of the movie, and the superhero movie in general, to the point of an aporia. it's an ending very similar in tone (to me) to The Prestige, which is actually the much more provocative movie, intellectually speaking.

The bottom line is that if a Bergman movie ended in aporia or moral ambiguity -- or lacked a clear cut POV on the morality and issue on display in the movie, rather than an "artistic distance" -- then I doubt we'd have much of a problem with it. So I think, on the one hand, it's fair to criticize TDK as being compromised to the point of incoherence or shallowness by its genre. But I think you miss what it's doing to its genre, which is is actually pretty interesting without being original.

ryan, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 19:16 (fifteen years ago) link

And Dan, where did you find that!

It's been posted on ILX before! I just googled it.

the funny thing is it can be found IN THIS THREAD

I think tuomas did it like 8000 posts ago

Edward III, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 19:26 (fifteen years ago) link

Hahaha, beautiful.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 19:26 (fifteen years ago) link

we should really break this thread up into distinct eras - paleozoic, mesozoic, contenderizer first appears on two legs

Edward III, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 19:27 (fifteen years ago) link

More shoehorning! Collect your 'so-and-so...Dark Knight' stories here:

'Jason Baron, Dark Knight'

'Tricky: trip-hop's Dark Knight'

Etc. etc.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 19:38 (fifteen years ago) link

“I feel like I’m dumb because I feel like I don’t get how many things that are so smart. It’s like a Ferrari engine of storytelling and script writing and I’m like, ‘That’s not my idea of what I want to see in a movie.’ I loved The Prestige but didn’t understand The Dark Knight. Didn’t get it, still can’t tell you what happened in the movie, what happened to the character and in the end they need him to be a bad guy. I’m like, ‘I get it. This is so high brow and so f–king smart, I clearly need a college education to understand this movie.’ You know what? F-ck DC comics. That’s all I have to say and that’s where I’m really coming from.” -- Robert Downey Jr.

David R., Wednesday, 13 August 2008 19:48 (fifteen years ago) link

I love that quote.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 19:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Also occurs to me that one of the biggest flaws with the movie is that it is chock full of false dilemmas. That is, moral problems that are only problems in the hypothetical sense.

For instance, lucius balking at the sonar device strikes me as insincere because I doubt anyone on earth, in those particular circumstances, would really even hesitate to use it. Does lucius make the "right" choice? Unquestionably, in my mind. Is he compromised by that choice? In terms of theoretical ethics, almost certainly. Would any of us hold him accountable? No. Would the law? Yes, because the law isn't a person. And on and on.

ryan, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

The instant (albeit via traumatic means) transformation of Harvey Dent was really the only plot element that didn't work for me.

Granny Dainger, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link

(the film's conclusion is) quite obviously forcing the themes of the movie, and the superhero movie in general, to the point of an aporia. it's an ending very similar in tone (to me) to The Prestige, which is actually the much more provocative movie, intellectually speaking.

The bottom line is that if a Bergman movie ended in aporia or moral ambiguity -- or lacked a clear cut POV on the morality and issue on display in the movie, rather than an "artistic distance" -- then I doubt we'd have much of a problem with it. So I think, on the one hand, it's fair to criticize TDK as being compromised to the point of incoherence or shallowness by its genre. But I think you miss what it's doing to its genre, which is is actually pretty interesting without being original.

-- ryan

I’m not sure about the “aporia” you find in the film’s conclusion. We may bring our own doubts about the real value of Dent-as-symbol to The Dark Knight, but similar doubts are not clearly expressed by the film itself. Instead, it presents the idea that Gotham needs a symbolic savior of some kind as a given, and lets its characters work out how best to satisfy that need. Furthermore, I think The Dark Knight at least passively endorses the choice that Gordon and the Batman ultimately make with regard to this. The same can be said about the suggestion, in film’s closing scenes, that the dissemination of an inspiring lie can be more noble (or at least more socially valuable) than the revelation of a dispiriting truth. Rather than present this idea in shades of gray, the film’s penultimate scenes and Gordon’s closing voiceover unambiguously endorse it, stressing the necessity and mournful nobility of the Batman’s retreat to the shadows. I don’t see anything deeply “Dostoevskyan” in this, and to drag in The Grand Inquisitor does the film favors of association it hasn’t earned.

While the film clearly implicates the existence and ambition of the Batman in the generation of the threat that eventually imperils the entire city, it does not cast as much doubt on his methods and/or motives as some posters here suggest. The plot’s most tragic outcomes have less to do with the Batman’s failures than with the Joker’s successes. Nor do I accept that the fundamental conventions and functions of the genre necessarily “compromise” the film. The Dark Knight could have intelligently engaged with its themes and situations while still respecting the superhero genre, had it cared to.

Again, it’s by no means a bad movie and really is an interesting entry in its genre, but I don’t believe that the filmmakers took sufficient care to thoroughly work out the ideas involved. As a result, The Dark Knight suggests a lot without offering much, and seems to make some rather dubious moral arguments along the way.

Downey quote is hilarious & endearing. He's Jeff Spicoli.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 21:22 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't really treat any of the characters as a reliable narrator so I didn't take away the same level of import from Gordon's voiceover as you did, particularly since Dent's injury and Rachel's death were a direct result of Gordon's misjudgment.

Alfred's analogy as to the hopelessness of the situation Bruce and co. have created for themselves (if you want to get rid of The Joker, you're going to have to raze Gotham) resonated more with me than anything else; Batman doesn't want to do that, but he doesn't want to disengage and leave the city to the wolves either, so what can he do? The answer ends up being some sketchy shit (turning all the cell phones into spy transmitters, smacking around prisoners while they're in captivity, beating up riot cops) that, more or less, seems reasonable at the time but is rather clearly leading down the path of razing Gotham. The closure at the end of the film doesn't really resolve anything; the city is still fucked up, other criminals are moving into the power vacuum left by Harvey's rampage and the populace thinks their chosen vigilante hero has turned on them. I don't see that as an endorsement of Batman's ideas and methods, particularly when combined with Rachel's letter about how Bruce's idea of passing the reins over to someone legitimate are a fantasy because he's cuckoo.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 21:33 (fifteen years ago) link

Right. Which is why I feel the film's tone is tragic in the classical sense. What else are these characters to do when faced with such nihilistic evil? Dent crumbles in the face of it and becomes nihilistic too. Batman and co. are forced to compromise their moral integrity, but the logic of the situation literally allows them no other choice. The ending is merely batman's attempt to acknowledge this tragedy and own up to it. He's no hero for doing so as Gordon says, except maybe a tragic hero. Maybe that's the film's innovation then: superhero to tragic hero.

The film presents this narrative many times over. "die the hero or live long enough to be the villian"

What's remarkable to me is that a film with such pessimism is really reapnating with a large audience. Maybe they are seeing something else.

ryan, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 21:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Dent crumbles in the face

Granny Dainger, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 21:50 (fifteen years ago) link

Why would we see Gordon as a less than reliable narrator? It's an interesting idea, but I don't see how the film at any time undermines the validity of Gordon's POV. His failure to see through the Joker's dastardly plot hardly makes a moron of him. The film doesn't ever suggest that a reliable man would have known better, in fact, I think Gordon is presented as an avatar of moral reliability.

The point you make about Alfred's parable is a good one, though. That's the one idea the film does attempt to seriously wrestle with: how do you wage war without destroying what you're trying to protect? I'm not faulting The Dark Knight for its handling of this theme. It's a difficult question, and while I'm not sure that Gordon and the Batman ever really get the balance right, I still think the film is, in general, very much in their corner.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 21:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Gordon hires crooked cops, refuses to share secrets with the white-knight D.A., lies to his wife and kids... he's a sympathetic character but not someone whose point of view I entirely trust w/r/t issues of law, morality and justice.

max, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 21:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes exactly; near the beginning of the movie, Dent and Gordon argue about the crooked cops in Gordon's department and Gordon has a "they're good cops who deserve a second chance!" shitfit. Later, two of those "good cops", who are still working for the mob and, by extension, the Joker, kidnap Dent and Rachel out from underneath the police department's nose, in fact WITH THE DEPARTMENT'S BLESSING (I've only seen the movie once but I vaguely remember some "we're putting our best people on the case" rhetoric right before the shitstorm).

Gordon knows he has crooked cops with mob ties in his department but blocks Dent from getting to them, which later not only bites him on the ass but eats both cheeks and a good portion of thigh to boot. The moral compasses in the movie are Rachel (who blows the fuck up) and Alfred (who throughout both movies is constantly telling Bruce that Batman isn't the right answer because uh crazypants).

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:03 (fifteen years ago) link

I feel like you got irritated with the direction the movie was going and stopped paying attention to it.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Gordon hires crooked cops, refuses to share secrets with the white-knight D.A., lies to his wife and kids... he's a sympathetic character but not someone whose point of view I entirely trust w/r/t issues of law, morality and justice.

-- max

You're being a little hard on ol' JG. While Gordon protects his own against outside interference, I don't think the film presents him as someone who knowingly permits corruption to thrive. And he's got every reason to be a bit paranoid (see the bit about worms in his own department and the white-knight D.A.'s nickname). Finally, in lying to the wife and kids, he's only enacting on a personal level the sort of protective duplicity he and the Batman foist on the entire city at the film's conclusion. That is, he's "doing what's best for everybody," much as it pains him.

I'm not saying that he's perfect. Nothing and no one in the film is 100% perfect (which is to its credit), but I didn't get the impression that the film repudiates his moral stance. Instead, it seems to sees him as a fundamentally good man who is nevertheless capable of errors and lapses. And it's a wiser, chastened version of that good Gordon who deliver's the film's moral.

It's not that I wasn't paying attention, but rather that I don't see the film the way you do.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:17 (fifteen years ago) link

That last bit goes out to HI DERE.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:18 (fifteen years ago) link

You saw wiser and chastened; I saw shell-shocked and upset.

This movie basically lets you put whatever reading you want to on it pretty comfortably.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Also I think it's pushing the idea that Rachel is 100% perfect, which is one of the reasons why she blows the fuck up.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:20 (fifteen years ago) link

This movie basically lets you put whatever reading you want to on it pretty comfortably.

-- HI DERE

Yeah, okay, you got me there.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah I think the explosion sorta signifies that the good sheriff has got out of dodge.

ryan, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Might be interesting to see if that's the moment some people feel the narrative/morality gets incoherent.

ryan, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:27 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that's exactly when people started hating on the movie; the thing I keep seeing over and over, even from people who liked the movie, was how much it was let down by the final third.

HI DERE, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I disliked the last third, but only because I started to get bored. That's the point at which the narrative surrendered to a seemingly endless series of loud things and overstressed "suspense" sequences. Somewhat before the explosion, mind -- during the tunnel chase with Dent in the police truck, that's when I started to get restless.

contenderizer, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 22:35 (fifteen years ago) link

I agree with pretty much everything Dan says on this thread. here's a blog plug - http://rocktimists.blogspot.com/2008/08/dark-knight.html

Watched Candy last night, ledger's indie Aussie drug romance film from 2006 - very good. Didn't seem AT ALL like the guy who played either Ennis Del Mar or The Joker, to Ledger's great, and sad, credit. Something MENTAL struck me, though - if Nolan did want The Joker in a third film and was to recast the role, then Joseph Gordon-Levitt might just be perfect.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 14 August 2008 08:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I think that's exactly when people started hating on the movie; the thing I keep seeing over and over, even from people who liked the movie, was how much it was let down by the final third.

having just seen it - I think maybe the problem is not that the last third is bad, but that the film is maybe over-long and people just blame the last bit.

The Real Dirty Vicar, Thursday, 14 August 2008 10:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, I think I'd go with that. First viewing, and even second, I was fine with it, but watching it a third time I was definitely thinking "OK, we can hurry up here".

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 14 August 2008 10:41 (fifteen years ago) link

The same can be said about the suggestion, in film’s closing scenes, that the dissemination of an inspiring lie can be more noble (or at least more socially valuable) than the revelation of a dispiriting truth. Rather than present this idea in shades of gray, the film’s penultimate scenes and Gordon’s closing voiceover unambiguously endorse it, stressing the necessity and mournful nobility of the Batman’s retreat to the shadows.

Wow, I think you're hanging on awful lot on "unambiguously" here without evidence to support it. It's not as if there's a closing title that says, " . . . and 12 months later, Gotham City was like Paradise on Earth!"

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 14 August 2008 11:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, my interpretation is that things are about to accelerate even faster into bleakness.

Scik Mouthy, Thursday, 14 August 2008 12:48 (fifteen years ago) link

Finally, in lying to the wife and kids, he's only enacting on a personal level the sort of protective duplicity he and the Batman foist on the entire city at the film's conclusion. That is, he's "doing what's best for everybody," much as it pains him.

one of the moments in the movie that stays with me is when gordon comes home to his wife and she slaps him. if you're married w/ children, think about how this would go over: "I let you and the kids think I died, but it's okay it was a war-on-crime thing." it's a rorschach test as to whether you think gordon's actions were justified or not.

the other night on the colbert report he interviewed a woman who wrote a book called the dark side about bush + cheney's torture policies. colbert did a very funny spiel about how ideals can't be compromised if no one knows you're violating them, which put me in mind of tdk and the discussion here.

http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=179267

Edward III, Thursday, 14 August 2008 14:47 (fifteen years ago) link

I been thinking... On one hand, by pushing hard at the question of whether or not the city really needs the sort of saving offered by the Batman, and by suggesting that he inadvertently empowers the evils he fights, The Dark Knight really does question the Batman’s implicit heroism. This is both interesting and admirable, especially in a big-budget superhero film, and it complexifies whatever political reading we might attach to it. I grant that.

Nevertheless, I believe the film ultimately implies that Gotham City really does need the Batman, though it can’t quite face this truth. To admit the necessity of the sort of “justice” the Batman dispenses and represents would be to admit how bad things have become, and this generates more despair than hope. Batman is the hero of last resort, a terrifying and dangerous savior appropriate only to the worst of times. That’s why he must be pushed back underground when the city tries to rise towards the light. Furthermore, while Batman does in a sense “create” the Joker, it seems to me that, in the film’s moral logic, this is an inevitable result of standing up against evil: you can’t overcome your enemies without first making them angry. And while there are risks involved, the consequences, terrible as they may be, are preferable to simply rolling over and playing dead.

So while there’s some subversive complexity here, The Dark Knight doesn’t attempt to “de-heroicize” or even, really, to critique its central character. The film’s depiction of the Gotham City and the Batman are entirely consistent with 20-plus years of comics storytelling. Despite the terrible, even pyrrhic cost of battle he wages, the Batman remains at all times the hero of the story (tragic and otherwise), and this is how it should be. As I see it, the film’s final scene attempts to provide a solution to Rachel’s story about how prideful Caesar eventually became the villain he fought, and also to Alfred’s warnings about what Batman risks destroying in pressing his quest. I suspect that this is why The Dark Knight so relentlessly stresses the city’s need for a symbolic savior: if real villains threatened the city, the Batman would have to stick around to fight them, and better times could never come. By shifting the field of combat from the physical to the symbolic, however, the film allows the Batman to become truly unnecessary, and this in turn allows him to make his noble sacrifice – becoming a symbol of the darkness he has finally (and probably only momentarily) vanquished, so that a symbol of the light can lead the city upwards and away.

Agree that I was stretching to defend Gordon. While I don’t think he’s depicted as “unreliable”, I don’t think the film excuses his treatment of his family.

Again though, all this hardly repudiates the Batman’s methods, and still works pretty well as a Bushco apologia. Among other things. Among a MILLION other things. No argument there.

http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj242/donaldparsley/batmng.jpg

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:43 (fifteen years ago) link

The only part of that I want to comment on is this:

Furthermore, while Batman does in a sense “create” the Joker, it seems to me that, in the film’s moral logic, this is an inevitable result of standing up against evil: you can’t overcome your enemies without first making them angry.

The other way to look at this is "every action has an equal and opposite reaction", a reading bolstered by the ending of Batman Begins.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link

that's some dumb-ass armchair social philosophy y'all.

on reflection, this movie was dumb. but fun for the first 2/3. probably wouldn't have been nearly as favorably predisposed if i hadn't seen the IMAX version.

amateurist, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:53 (fifteen years ago) link

i think i was partly won over by lots of really loud noises.

amateurist, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:53 (fifteen years ago) link

The movie was entertainment and I really loved it for that. The rest of it is just idle chatter for the most part.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:54 (fifteen years ago) link

haha only 3 more years left to talk about tdk guys

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/2812/riddlerpostercopycopyys0.jpg

Edward III, Thursday, 14 August 2008 18:03 (fifteen years ago) link

The other way to look at this is "every action has an equal and opposite reaction", a reading bolstered by the ending of Batman Begins.
Good point. I can see that, but I wonder: don't the basic assumptions of the genre presuppose that some kind of action is necessary? If we assume, instead, that the city is fundamentally healthy and exists in a balanced state absent heroic action, then yeah, Batman is guilty of rocking an otherwise seaworthy boat. But I'm not sure I buy that. Not denying it either, mind...

I like your suggestion, as it subverts not only Batman's heroism, but the entire superhero premise (Peter Parker was right in the first place to let the robber go, and probably should have continued in his wrestling career).

And yeah, entertainment, woo.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 August 2008 18:04 (fifteen years ago) link

hahahah so fake (xp)

ledge, Thursday, 14 August 2008 18:04 (fifteen years ago) link

damn burned by the internet again

Edward III, Thursday, 14 August 2008 18:08 (fifteen years ago) link

"experts still have no answers to spate of mysterious letters"

da croupier, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:14 (fifteen years ago) link

Dudes the threequel is saved -- BRIAN AUSTIN GREEN has expressed interest in playing the Riddler!!!

David R., Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:23 (fifteen years ago) link

haha waht

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:24 (fifteen years ago) link

hope he raps all his riddles over Slim Kid Tre tracks

Granny Dainger, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:25 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^make it so

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 14 August 2008 20:25 (fifteen years ago) link

Robert Downey Jr:

"I loved The Prestige but didn't understand The Dark Knight. Didn't get it, still can't tell you what happened in the movie, what happened to the character and in the end they need him to be a bad guy. I'm like, 'I get it. This is so highbrow and so fucking smart, I clearly need a college education to understand this movie.' You know what? Fuck DC comics. That's all I have to say and that's where I'm really coming from."

http://www.moviehole.net/200814729-interview-robert-downey-jr-2

Dr Morbius, Monday, 18 August 2008 14:03 (fifteen years ago) link

hi welcome to Daver's post from 5 days ago that's still on the screen

HI DERE, Monday, 18 August 2008 14:05 (fifteen years ago) link

too far up to check

Dr Morbius, Monday, 18 August 2008 14:11 (fifteen years ago) link

dr moebius

Edward III, Monday, 18 August 2008 15:24 (fifteen years ago) link

watch out Ledger fans the Notorious B.A.G. is gonna surprise us all

latebloomer, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link

riddle me this:

http://www.teenidols4you.com/thumb/Actors/brianagreen/BrianAustinGreen1.jpg

latebloomer, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:06 (fifteen years ago) link

So yesterday shortly before I headed back down south I stumbled across five or so minutes of Batman Forever. It seems like something from another universe.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

a supremely nipply universe

latebloomer, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

I would like to officially express my interest in playing the riddler

Edward III, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

a supremely nipply universe

That was the Batman and Robin universe, which I believe existed only in the realms of theoretical physics.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link

forever had the nips too!

latebloomer, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link

but yeah, b&r multiplied n by millions

latebloomer, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link

forever kinda depresses me - kilmer would've been an A++ Batman in an actually good Batman movie.

Roz, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^^cosign

HI DERE, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

That film made me hate Tommy Lee Jones for several years.

HI DERE, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

The bit I saw had full-on Tommy Lee as Harvey Dent action and I just shook my head.

Then there was Jim Carrey.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Jim Carrey was actually the second-most tolerable thing in the movie! At least his take on The Riddler had something of a precedent; Two-Face was never a gurning, giggling idiot EVER.

HI DERE, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:24 (fifteen years ago) link

drew barrymore/debi mazar. :/

Roz, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link

all that talk about brian austin green upthread, has anyone actually seen him on The Sarah Connor Chronicles? is he any good?

Roz, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:29 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean i know, lol right, still wonder why he's getting asked about this at all.

Roz, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link

He's qualified to play a supervillain:

- He has a 6-pack.
- He looks like a douchebag.

SORTED LADIES AND GENTS YR NEW RIDDLER

HI DERE, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link

getting asked vs. expressing interest

Edward III, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Brian Austin Green Would Make a Terrific Riddler, Claims Brian Austin Green

Edward III, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:40 (fifteen years ago) link

"I'd really like to play The Riddler."
"So you wanna be Bat-mite, huh? Seems like a perfect fit!"
"...No, I said The Rid-"
"Sharon! Brian's on board as Bat-mite! Send me script 34b, please."
"WTF, I am not gonna fucking be Bat-mite, I only came here because of The Riddler."
"Let me bring out you to the actor playing The Riddler; I think you've worked with Ian Ziering before, haha?"
"WAHT"

</custos>

HI DERE, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Here's his demo tape: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQU7HRJWS1s

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 18 August 2008 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link

haaaaa.

lol ziering voiced a character on Batman Beyond.

Roz, Monday, 18 August 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Bale learned acting from horses.

I kinda love him, cuz he's so wacky.

Dr. Superman, Thursday, 21 August 2008 03:38 (fifteen years ago) link

all that talk about brian austin green upthread, has anyone actually seen him on The Sarah Connor Chronicles? is he any good?

He sucks on that show, but I just sort of hate his character (Kyle Reese's previously-unmentioned moody brother), which doesn't give him a lot of different notes to play. "In the FUTURE, we would have killed those cops to get inside that building!!"

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 21 August 2008 13:26 (fifteen years ago) link

He sucks on that show

FITE

David R., Thursday, 21 August 2008 13:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Hahaha.

TDK has now overtaken Indiana Jones to be the biggest worldwide hit of the year, and is about $20 million plus off from breaking $500 million here.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 21 August 2008 13:53 (fifteen years ago) link

drew barrymore/debi mazar. :/

-- Roz, Monday, August 18, 2008 4:26 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Link

drew barrymore was my favorite ting about forever but then again i was 13

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 21 August 2008 16:34 (fifteen years ago) link

finally saw this last night. 30 minutes too long at least. this wasn't helped by the theater mysteriously turning off the air or turning on the heat about half way through the movie which made me struggle to stay awake. but still: the very first shot when batman drops off the top of a building made my stomach leap. there are shots like this in EVERY superhero movie but something about the colors and the way it was composed made it very immersive and realistic.

akm, Sunday, 24 August 2008 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link

If Ledger wasn't dead would people still like this movie as much?

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 24 August 2008 21:02 (fifteen years ago) link

I would.

HI DERE, Sunday, 24 August 2008 21:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Same here.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 24 August 2008 21:09 (fifteen years ago) link

His death adds nothing to the brilliance of his performance that I could detect.

Oilyrags, Sunday, 24 August 2008 21:14 (fifteen years ago) link

love this movie

wtf @ all the haters

deej, Saturday, 30 August 2008 00:05 (fifteen years ago) link

i cant understand how anyone can get all mad doggie about this film's approach to moral/ethical issues. it wasn't '300' or something

deej, Saturday, 30 August 2008 00:06 (fifteen years ago) link

you have to understand, 6 days ago it was actually fashionable to hate on this movie

deeznuts, Saturday, 30 August 2008 00:06 (fifteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...

KEEP BRETT RATNER AWAY

Alba, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 14:00 (fifteen years ago) link

Excellent work Ratner, we kill the entire greatness of the Joker having no particular back-story by making a feature film to dismantle one of the better scripting decisions of TDK.

mh, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 14:03 (fifteen years ago) link

ugh no

i am the small cat (HI DERE), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 14:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Haha -- I know the reporter, I'll have to ask her what she thought of it all.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 14:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Hey, it worked for Hannibal Lecter!

David R., Wednesday, 24 September 2008 14:10 (fifteen years ago) link

It's not out of order to say that Brett Ratner is a fucking retard, is it?

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Dude wants to make a movie out of GUITAR HERO! Come on!

David R., Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:38 (fifteen years ago) link

To me it's more roffly to see how badly Ratner wants to associate himself with the big summer hits just past.

"Yeah, a JOKER background story with ROBERT DOWNEY JR., yeah! Please?"

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:40 (fifteen years ago) link

uh RDJ has publicly slagged off the Batman franchise ("fuck DC comics" etc.) = yes Rattner is a retard

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 15:46 (fifteen years ago) link

I'd like to ask a simple question about the plot of DKR: did the Joker know that Bruce Wayne is Batman? Because when he's about to blow up Harvey Dent and Rachel, he intentionally lies about their locations knowing that Batman would try to save Rachel, so he therefore ends up saving Harvey instead. But the Joker could only know that Batman would try to save Rachel if he knew Batman was Bruce Wayne, since the movie doesn't show any special relationship between Batman and Rachel, only between Bruce Wayne and Rachel.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link

uh Batman came to save Rachel at the party remember

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Joker threw her out the window...?

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:04 (fifteen years ago) link

But did the Joker know that? For all he knew Batman just came there to interrupt his scheme, saving Rachel was just a side effect of that.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link

(x-post)

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:06 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, he threw Rachel out of the window and Batman saved her, but he would've done that for anybody. That still doesn't imply any special relationship between the two.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:06 (fifteen years ago) link

Or maybe the Joker just assumed Batman is a big old chauvinist who'll always save the pretty girl even if saving the guy would make more sense?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link

didn't he make him choose between saving rachel or someone else (harvey?) at the party?

Jordan, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:10 (fifteen years ago) link

or the joker doesnt really give a shit which one batman saves and is a total schizophrenic psycho

Mohammed Butt (max), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:10 (fifteen years ago) link

didn't he make him choose between saving rachel or someone else (harvey?) at the party?

yeah this is my memory too

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link

no the Joker says something like this to Bats in the interrogation room: "does harvey know about you and his little fiance? For a moment there, I really thought you were Harvey Dent the way you jumped out the window after her."

Joker assumes that Batman has a thing for Rachel, but I don't think he knows that Bats = Bruce Wayne.

Our name is LeJean (Roz), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

But in the end of the movie the Joker says Harvey was "his ace in the hole", i.e. he had planned it beforehand that Harvey would survive and go crazy after Rachel dying.

(xx-post)

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:14 (fifteen years ago) link

CHAOS dude

David R., Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link

no the Joker says something like this to Bats in the interrogation room: "does harvey know about you and his little fiance? For a moment there, I really thought you were Harvey Dent the way you jumped out the window after her."

Joker assumes that Batman has a thing for Rachel, but I don't think he knows that Bats = Bruce Wayne.

This still doesn't make sense to me, surely the Joker should know that Batman would always try to save the life of any innocent person in danger, I don't see how saving Rachel automatically implies he has the hots for her?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:16 (fifteen years ago) link

surely the Joker should know that Batman would always try to save the life of any innocent person in danger

I don't see any reason for him to assume this.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link

I mean, Bats can't save EVERYBODY

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

the key line is this: "...the way you jumped out the window after her."

and about Harvey being the ace-in-the-hole: it doesn't matter either way. if they had managed to save rachel instead of dent, SHE too would have been racked with guilt and potentially corruptible against Batman, who Joker assumes is in love with her.

Our name is LeJean (Roz), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, but corrupting Rachel would've made much less sense than corrupting "Gotham's white knight" if you wanted to give the people of Gotham a lesson on morality and chaos, which seemed to be the Joker's whole plan.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link

joker bragging that harvey is the ace in the hole requires you to trust that joker is telling the truth which let me tell u i dont do for 1 minute

Mohammed Butt (max), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:24 (fifteen years ago) link

ok even if that does not happen, HARVEY WOULD HAVE DIED so the joker wins regardless. xp

Our name is LeJean (Roz), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:25 (fifteen years ago) link

joker bragging that harvey is the ace in the hole requires you to trust that joker is telling the truth which let me tell u i dont do for 1 minute

If this wasn't his plan, why would he have lied about the location of Harvey and Rachel in the first place?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:25 (fifteen years ago) link

ok even if that does not happen, HARVEY WOULD HAVE DIED so the joker wins regardless. xp

No, Harvey dying would've just made him a martyr, the whole point Joker wanted to prove was that even the white knight could be corrupted.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:27 (fifteen years ago) link

I think its important to bear in mind that the Joker's completely bonkers so searching for a rational decision-making process in a movie as convoluted as this one is fairly pointless.

but feel free to keep trying

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link

guh the original reason Joker was at that party was to kill Harvey Dent. dude changes his motivations according to which one would cause the most chaos.

Our name is LeJean (Roz), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link

He is shown to be quite able of planning things beforehand though, even if he's totally bonkers, the movie doesn't imply his actions are based on totally random decisions.

(x-post)

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:33 (fifteen years ago) link

movie doesn't imply his actions are based on totally random decisions

the movie pretty much explicitly states that he makes it up as he goes along iirc

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:33 (fifteen years ago) link

For example, he planned the part about getting into the jail and freeing the Chinese banker beforehand, didn't he?

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link

I think its important to bear in mind that Tuomas's completely bonkers so searching for a rational decision-making process in a thread as convoluted as this one is fairly pointless.

Dr. Superman, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link

hahahah

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link

[insert Joker slow clap]

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:37 (fifteen years ago) link

As well as the part about getting people into those boats to prove a point on human morality.

(xx-post)

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:37 (fifteen years ago) link

If this wasn't his plan, why would he have lied about the location of Harvey and Rachel in the first place?

― Tuomas, Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:25 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

my original point is that maybe he didnt lie at all and is just a fucking craz-o who either forgot where each one was or didnt care and then later told everyone he meant to do it all along

Mohammed Butt (max), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 16:51 (fifteen years ago) link

cant decide if this thread or rolling election thread is having the dumber argument atm

deej, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

my original point is that maybe he didnt lie at all and is just a fucking craz-o who either forgot where each one was or didnt care and then later told everyone he meant to do it all along

Maybe yeah, but as far as DKR is a movie which is supposed to have a dramatic structure, it wouldn't make much sense.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link

I think I preferred it when you were upset over Batman being a fascist

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Worst Dr. Manhattan yet.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 28 September 2008 16:57 (fifteen years ago) link

or the joker doesnt really give a shit which one batman saves and is a total schizophrenic psycho

otm. I got into a couple of big debates about what the joker was doing when he told batman where to find rachel. i like the interpretation that he has no idea himself and is just guessing for lols.

caek, Sunday, 28 September 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

Buried in this:

Then there was a question I had to ask: What did (Tim) Burton think of "The Dark Knight"? After a bit of fumbling around for words, Burton said: "I haven't seen it yet. I'm just, you know, busy. I do want to see it. I've heard it's very good. And I'm sure it is very good. Mostly everybody that I know that has seen it has said that it's very good and I take their word for it."

I thought it would be good to change the subject.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 October 2008 17:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Meantime, first of a new three-part interview with Nolan. Includes this:

GB: Could you see actually yourself not making the third Batman film?

NOLAN: Well ... let me think how to put this. There are two things to be said. One is the emphasis on story. What’s the story? Is there a story that’s going to keep me emotionally invested for the couple of years that it will take to make another one? That’s the overriding question. On a more superficial level, I have to ask the question: How many good third movies in a franchise can people name? (Laughs.) At the same time, in taking on the second one, we had the challenge of trying to make a great second movie, and there haven't been too many of those either. It’s all about the story really. If the story is there, everything is possible. I hope that was a suitably slippery answer.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 October 2008 17:56 (fifteen years ago) link

i love how difficult a set-up for a third movie it is, even as a hybrid of real events and things they'd planned on. i remember reading this thread when people were speaking hopefully of a certain dark knight character returning, somewhat fantastically, as someone from the comics, and thereby undoing some of the twists of the second film. the way it is is perfect; i'm reminded of the role of the mother's diaries in maus, of how frustrating it is to read about them knowing that they're not there, that there's this situation that can't yield a satisfying resolution. the way things have been left in batman's so genuinely, palpably frustrating and tangled, like with the note Alfred didn't deliver, and elicits emotions more complex than it ought to. i hope there's a third one, as long as it doesn't impinge upon or undo the scenario created by the last film.

schlump, Monday, 27 October 2008 19:17 (fifteen years ago) link

Nolan gets too much credit. The 60's show was just as hard-hitting in its political overtones:

human cactus (latebloomer), Sunday, 2 November 2008 17:36 (fifteen years ago) link

BTW it is a travesty that this show is not on DVD

human cactus (latebloomer), Sunday, 2 November 2008 17:41 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman did pal around with terrorists criminals.

"John Kerry dissed me, I'm trippin!" (Nicole), Sunday, 2 November 2008 17:54 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

So the DVD arrived yesterday and we watched it last night, our forth viewing (one in the cinema at a pre-screening with fans in Joker make-up; one first-week screening with ne'er-do-wells eating massive slushies at the cheap cinema; one hooky file recorded off a Spanish-language cinema in America watched on tiny MacBook).

And it was still ace. The soundtrack struck me more at home than in the cinema (I run the DVD player through my amp and hi-fi speakers, so it's not surround sound but it is loud and clear); it's one of the most dynamic films I've ever seen, the quiet bits are so quiet and then the loud bits, which often come suddenly, are FEROCIOUSLY FUCKING LOUD. The single rising tone in the soundtrack, the Joker's theme, is awesome, foreboding and unsettling. I was really struck by the pace and rhythm of the film too, more so now than in those first viewings where I was carried along by it, there's a real rise-and-fall momentum, moments of near chaos interspersed with very calm, very quiet areas of the film. Like, it goes from the fucking mentalism and nastiness of Joker's kidnap & explosion of Rachel & Dent, to Bruce Wayne and Alfred alone, isolated, high above Gotham, very quiet, almost serene.

I have no idea how they'd approach a third film in the series, if they wanted to. I think that interview Ned linked above is right; they'd need a proper story to tell before even thinking about bothering. Conceptually how do you then make the film though, even with the story? Do you try and make something bigger, longer, more profound, more operatic, more real? I'd almost like them to just make a 95-minute film rather than a 150-minute epic, I think. I watched all the Bourne films last week while off work sick, and the pacing and length of them was just brilliant. I don't think I'd want a third Nolan Batman film to try and out-do The Dark Knight.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Has anyone watched it on bluray yet? seems they've fucked about with the aspect ratio, so you can be watching widescreen at one point but the next you might be watching full screen. Not many people seem to be liking it.

Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Is that an attempt at capturing the Imax ratios?

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:14 (fifteen years ago) link

yes, quote from a happier customer on Amazon

"The feature is presented in varying widescreen and 16:9 formats to make full use of the IMAX sequences (the latter mostly comprising the opening bank heist sequence), but whilst this may sound disconcerting you barely notice it happening due to the clever editing of the film - it certainly did not spoil my enjoyment of the movie"

Ant Attack.. (Ste), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Ooh didn't realise this was out this week. Asda at lunchtime, I think, to buy the Blu-Ray.

This is what the Guardian Guide says about the Blu-Ray version:

The Blu-Ray transfer is like something from the future: loads of extras, and when the picture borders open up to accommodate the stunning IMAX-shot footage it's hard to imagine the point of watching this movie on any other format.

nate woolls, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:32 (fifteen years ago) link

turns out that the dude i keep talking to at the library about weird foreign horror movies is primarily employed as an imax projectionist, so come january i have the mad free dark knight imax reissue hookup! WIN, esp since i haven't seen the imax version yet.

EPISIORRHAPHY IS A TERRIBLE TERRIBLE NAME FOR A CHILDRENS SINGER (John Justen), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:55 (fifteen years ago) link

You lucky man -- very glad I caught an IMAX showing here, might do so again if it comes back (which I assume it will).

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 13:48 (fifteen years ago) link

I gave up about 3/4 thru reading this thread cos I was too fucking sick of people I thought were at least capable of watching a movie and taking it in getting ALL CONFUSED by the (apparently) labyrinthian structure of this movie and its philosophical unerpinnings, fuck it. IT'S NOT HARD. I mean you all had great ideas (I thought! Was happy would read thread again hahaha sick of internet IR DUMB shit actually) but it doesn't work with your personal take on them (no shit, you didn't make it), then there's some idiotic exchange about something you or both more or less made up, I've had enough.

THINK THROUGH, NOT AT. PLEASE?

Niles Caulder, Thursday, 11 December 2008 17:30 (fifteen years ago) link

tl, dr

Redknapp out (darraghmac), Thursday, 11 December 2008 17:31 (fifteen years ago) link

That'd be great, if it was long. Tho the fucking thread, etcet

Niles Caulder, Thursday, 11 December 2008 17:33 (fifteen years ago) link

it's a paradox...you can't complain about a thread without becoming part of it! ILX is great that way. the only way to win is not to play.

seeing this on blu-ray the other night actually improved my opinion of it a bit...the action scenes made more sense on a smaller screen...and my biggest problem was always the "answer" to the prisoner's dilemma on the ferry.

I think, however, what they did was pretty clever. The longer you wait, the longer you know the other boat is waiting...and that knowledge represents an ethical pull on you--"they haven't push the button either"--which makes it harder to push the button yourself. It's forces everyone into paralysis. It's sorta far-fetched and doesnt totally fit with the rest of the movie, but it's resolved better than I thought at first.

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:40 (fifteen years ago) link

I still love the SCARY BLACK MAN in that scene.

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:41 (fifteen years ago) link

thats Debo from friday!

ohhhh we pop champagne (deej), Thursday, 11 December 2008 19:47 (fifteen years ago) link

Man, I sure had a lot to say about this movie.

Suggest Ban Permalink (contenderizer), Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:17 (fifteen years ago) link

we all did, apparently. it was a long summer.

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:19 (fifteen years ago) link

A more innocent time, when all we worried about was Obama's celebrity and whether Michael Phelps used drugs.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:20 (fifteen years ago) link

i did make this point "if Batman was on one of the boats he wouldn't have had any trouble pushing the button."

and me from a few months ago makes me think now: i wonder if this is true? Batman claims to be able to make the decisions others can't make (like SCARY BLACK DUDE does..SCARY BLACK DUDE = Batman? or would batman push the button?)

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:21 (fifteen years ago) link

oh im sorry "SCARY BLACK MAN", that is.

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:25 (fifteen years ago) link

Man, I sure had a lot to say about this movie.

And it turns out I was right after all, as usual.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:25 (fifteen years ago) link

I really seriously doubt Batman would push the button.

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:27 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah probably. the only way "out" the ethical paradoxes the Joker creates is to make the "impossible" decision, which is Batman's role, and i guess why he's banished "outside" where decisions like that are possible, and it's the same place as the SCARY BLACK MAN claims to come from before he tosses it out the window.

im really sorry. im an english/philosopher major and geek out over this stuff.

ryan, Thursday, 11 December 2008 20:31 (fifteen years ago) link

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/article2048300.ece

The Beverly Hills Cop star, 47, has been signed up by British director CHRISTOPHER NOLAN to reprise the role played by JIM CARREY in 1995’s Batman Forever.

The surprise move follows speculation linking Pirates of the Caribbean star JOHNNY DEPP to the part.

The film, set for a 2010 release, is being developed under the working title Gotham.

Execs have also signed up rising Transformers star SHIA LABEOUF, 22, to play Robin.

CHRISTIAN BALE will return as Bruce Wayne, while MICHAEL CAINE will again play Bruce’s assistant Alfred.

Meanwhile, Brit RACHEL WEISZ is said to be up for the Catwoman role.

Insiders also revealed to The Sun the flick will end on a cliffhanger over whether Batman survives a blast at Wayne Towers.

Nolan had been tight-lipped about the future of the Batman films after being rocked by the January death of HEATH LEDGER — tipped to receive a posthumous Oscar for his role as The Joker in Batman Returns.

A film insider said: “Chris wasn’t sure if he wanted to do another movie but as soon as he decided to, he got the wheels in motion.

“Eddie’s a fantastic addition. Everyone’s excited to see what he does as the Riddler.”

web sharif (jeff), Thursday, 18 December 2008 08:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Hmm, hopefully the addition of Murphy and Robin means the third movie will be more playful and not so gritty and serious. We've already had two movies of that, so maybe third one could be a bit different?

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 09:27 (fifteen years ago) link

the playful batmans outnumber the 'gritty and serious' ones by a healthy margin

batman forever was awful, only thing good about it was the seal song on the soundtrack ^_^

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 09:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Well, I've said it before and I don't really want to go to that debate again (see the Batman Begins thread), but since superheroes are by their very nature a fantasy/non-realist idea, if you take them too seriously the results will be either silly or morally questionable. Superheroes stories tend to work best if you treat them as modern fables rather than serious, realistic stories. Burton realized that, and I think he found a nice balance between "dark" and "playful". Nolan hasn't quite made it yet, but at least Dark Knight was an improvement over Batman Begins. I liked how he treated Joker more like a symbol than a "real" person with "real" psychological backstory. Though Two-Face didn't really work exactly because they tried to give him a "proper", credible psychological reason for becoming a villain, and it sounded ludicrous.

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 09:45 (fifteen years ago) link

I hope this is bullshit. Em's gonna be distraught if Shia Leboeuf's in it.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 18 December 2008 09:53 (fifteen years ago) link

I guess re; Eddie Murphy, that people were "wtf" at Heath ledger to start with.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 18 December 2008 09:56 (fifteen years ago) link

YESSSSSSS @ Shia, that's such awesome and inspired casting (just watched Disturbia the other night!)

Someone Still Loves You Evan and Jaron (Tape Store), Thursday, 18 December 2008 09:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Well, at least Eddie as an actor seems to fit perfectly to the chosen role, which wasn't what people thought about Ledger when he was announced.

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 09:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Or would someone really want a grim and gritty Riddler?

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Oh well, this new franchise was a good run while it lasted.

A bright pair of newcomers called BROS (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Or would someone really want a grim and gritty Riddler?

― Tuomas, Thursday, December 18, 2008 4:01 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i wonder if that was the logic behind the jim carrey selection

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:04 (fifteen years ago) link

Eh?

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:05 (fifteen years ago) link

both of these castings are intriguing at the very least - but does murphy remember how to act while not wearing a fat suit? i wonder if he'll show up to the first day of casting as a fat, woman riddler out of habit

robschneiderMk2 (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:06 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman Forever was before Carrey became a "serious" actor, right?

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:06 (fifteen years ago) link

(x-post)

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:07 (fifteen years ago) link

ok you know what y'all are totally allowed to play along with whatever else you like but if anyone takes the following bait you will all get nothing but coal

"Though Two-Face didn't really work exactly because they tried to give him a "proper", credible psychological reason for becoming a villain, and it sounded ludicrous."

Everybody good with that?

TOMBOT, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:07 (fifteen years ago) link

xxxxpp

so what exactly does it take to write for the Sun? I just find it hard to believe Eddie starring in two such blockbusters 2010; Batman and "Untitled Eddie Murphy/Romeo and Juliet Project"

sonderangerbot, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Is stating your opinion called "baiting" these days?

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:10 (fifteen years ago) link

Tuomas, I don't know if you noticed, but while you were busy thinking Nolan's Batman films were too gritty, everyone else was out there making The Dark Knight the most popular and successful film EVER almost, so, y'know, shhhhh.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:12 (fifteen years ago) link

got the finn patrol on the challop patrol

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Since when did "popular" equal "unassailable" on ILX?

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:18 (fifteen years ago) link

And like I said, I liked DK more than BB, but there were certain things in it that I still didn't think worked so well, like Dent's transformation to Two-Face. Is that really a challenging opinion?

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:19 (fifteen years ago) link

i think its a challop, unless you slept through the 90s, to imply that a wacky hijinks batman would be a good direction to go in.

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Tuomas, there is no way anybody can mount a successful argument against your opinion that Harvey Dent's character arc into Two-Face seems ludicrous. You have structured your statement in such a way that is is essentially impossible to address without engaging in straw man or ad hominem fallacies (I didn't say that, why are you attacking me). Frankly you do this all the time, and for all intents, it boils down to flamebait.
So I'm giving you a fucking break and asking everybody else not to engage you in arguing about it so this thread stays open, I stay sane, you stay registered as a poster, and yellow cards are kept to a minimum.

You're pretty high up in the Suggest Ban standings. You may want to take a little bit of time and think about why that is (hint: I just told you).

TOMBOT, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:27 (fifteen years ago) link

Meanwhile, Brit RACHEL WEISZ is said to be up for the Catwoman role.

^^ oh hells yes

special guest stars mark bronson, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:36 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.geekshow.us/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/rachel_catwoman.jpg
u r welcome

sonderangerbot, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:38 (fifteen years ago) link

You have structured your statement in such a way that is is essentially impossible to address without engaging in straw man or ad hominem fallacies (I didn't say that, why are you attacking me).

Hold on, what do you mean by this? My statement was just my honest opinion on the movie, I didn't mean it to be some sort of argument that can't be criticized, in fact I'd like to hear differing opinions on this thing.

So I'm giving you a fucking break and asking everybody else not to engage you in arguing about it so this thread stays open, I stay sane, you stay registered as a poster, and yellow cards are kept to a minimum. You're pretty high up in the Suggest Ban standings. You may want to take a little bit of time and think about why that is (hint: I just told you).

Hold on, is having differing opinions really enough to get suggest bans or yellow cards? If so, things have gotten kinda sad. I thought bans and yellow cards were meant to be only for personal abuse and stuff like that.

(The "Most consistent ILX posters" thread is a different issue, and I'm sorry for that.)

Tuomas, Thursday, 18 December 2008 10:42 (fifteen years ago) link

My statement was just my honest opinion on the movie

http://healthcare.zdnet.com/images/not-me.jpg

the sun just sent me a text (gbx), Thursday, 18 December 2008 11:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Eddie Murphy, star of FAT BITCH and WHO DAT HINJA, in... THIS HONKY RIDDLER BE TRIPPIN'!

James Mitchell, Thursday, 18 December 2008 12:06 (fifteen years ago) link

you guys realize this Sun story is BS right?

You go, Squirrel TM (latebloomer), Thursday, 18 December 2008 12:14 (fifteen years ago) link

at least it's a bit more thought out than the one saying the guy from Twilight was the new Joker

sonderangerbot, Thursday, 18 December 2008 12:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Who the hell want robin in the film?
Will remember not to get excited about this one when it's coming out.

not_goodwin, Thursday, 18 December 2008 12:26 (fifteen years ago) link

Apart from Weisz...

...drool.

not_goodwin, Thursday, 18 December 2008 12:27 (fifteen years ago) link

the story IS probably a load of bull, but I wants me some catweisz.

Millsner, Thursday, 18 December 2008 12:31 (fifteen years ago) link

but does murphy remember how to act while not wearing a fat suit?

Dude got an Oscar nom for "Showgirls!"

Emergency Rainbow (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 18 December 2008 13:55 (fifteen years ago) link

Basically, Eddie Murphy is a good actor who seems to desperately need a good director otherwise he runs roughshod over the movies he appears in (see also: Jim Carrey).

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:05 (fifteen years ago) link

That Weisz shot feels astonishing.

the pinefox, Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:10 (fifteen years ago) link

That's not the only thing that feels astonishing.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:15 (fifteen years ago) link

I seem to remember reading Christian Bale said that he wouldn't do a Batman film with Robin in it.

Oh yeah:

“If Robin crops up in one of the new Batman films, I’ll be chaining myself up somewhere and refusing to go to work.”

http://www.slashfilm.com/2008/07/02/christian-bale-rules-out-robin-for-batman-3-and-beyond/

circa1916, Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Dude got an Oscar nom for "Showgirls!"

Kyle McLachlan and Elizabeth Berkeley both should have been nominated.

Nicolars (Nicole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Now I'm imagining a scene where Eddie Murphy gives Kyle M. a lapdance while Elizabeth Berkley watches.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:32 (fifteen years ago) link

I agree with Tuomas. I enjoyed TDK but as soon as Batman himself showed up I was thrown out of the movie briefly. In the serious/realistic world Nolan bases the story, a man dressed like that just appears ridiculous. Is ridiculous.

DavidM, Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:34 (fifteen years ago) link

people who have never been attacked in a dark warehouse by a ninja dressed as a bat always think it's "ridiculous."

Kerm, Thursday, 18 December 2008 15:37 (fifteen years ago) link

You know, if you're not going to buy into the baseline conceit of a movie, you might be better off spending your time doing something else instead of watching it. It's not like it was a huge SURPRISE that a) the tone was going to be gritty-serious, and b) it would feature a dude in a cape.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:09 (fifteen years ago) link

much like a king boy pato post

uh oh I'm having a fanta girl (some dude), Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:22 (fifteen years ago) link

Well, I've said it before and I don't really want to go to that debate again (see the Batman Begins thread), but since superheroes are by their very nature a fantasy/non-realist idea, if you take them too seriously the results will be either silly or morally questionable. Superheroes stories tend to work best if you treat them as modern fables rather than serious, realistic stories. Burton realized that, and I think he found a nice balance between "dark" and "playful". Nolan hasn't quite made it yet, but at least Dark Knight was an improvement over Batman Begins. I liked how he treated Joker more like a symbol than a "real" person with "real" psychological backstory. Though Two-Face didn't really work exactly because they tried to give him a "proper", credible psychological reason for becoming a villain, and it sounded ludicrous.

― Tuomas, Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:45 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

see i think a major fallacy of your argument, tuomas, is the idea that because TDK is dark & serious that it is somehow "realist." it's no more realistic than a joel schumacher batman. there's nothing REALISTIC about any of these movies at all. nolan's is as much a fable as a tim burton batman movie, just in a different key. i agree that superhero stuff works better as fantasy, but fantasy does not have to = goofy or funny. most fables and fairy tales are pretty f'ing dark.

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:37 (fifteen years ago) link

ayo slocki & other non-tuomas dudes i got real real bored at batman begins & skipped this ish cuz 1) dont believe the hype 2) it looked like some b.s.... would i actually be feeling it?? is joker actually funny?? i love jack nicholson "he's at home.. WASHING HIS TIGHTS!!@!@!" joker and poncey animated series joker not self-cutter emo juggaloker and christian bale is pretty f'n lame too imo

the meth (jodie sweetin ha ha) (and what), Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link

see i think a major fallacy of your argument, tuomas, is the idea that because TDK is dark & serious that it is somehow "realist." it's no more realistic than a joel schumacher batman. there's nothing REALISTIC about any of these movies at all. nolan's is as much a fable as a tim burton batman movie, just in a different key. i agree that superhero stuff works better as fantasy, but fantasy does not have to = goofy or funny. most fables and fairy tales are pretty f'ing dark.

― s1ocki, Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:37 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark'

i don't understand why you are still saying these things to him over and over. you are comnpletely correct, and everything you say is 100% truth bomb but he's just going to come back with some false tautology like "harvey dent is ludicrous because i think his character looked silly with makeup and also i think that maggie gyllenhaal wouldn't be his type anyway" and you're back to square one.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:45 (fifteen years ago) link

this movie is way too long but it has some pretty awesome stuff, i really liked heath ledger as the joker--definitely brings something new to the role, this sort of oopsy little-boy-ness that is deeply creepy. some pretty good set pieces though if it does get way too self-serious by the end. i dug it mostly!

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:47 (fifteen years ago) link

yo schef that was actually the first time i've confronted t-bone on this contentious issue and i prob will not re-engage if that is the response i get (i didnt bother reading the whole thread so maybe what i've said has already been gone over 1mill times)

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:47 (fifteen years ago) link

i just watched this on DVD and enjoyed it even more because i could just watch it without thinking about "oh is this as good as it supposed to be" blah blah blah

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

oh also andwhat, if you want to know my track record on batman, i thought hte first one was awesome until he actually put on the batman suit, then i thought it got a little lame

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link

lol i guess i just had you confused with EVERYONE ELSE ON ILX EVER sorry!!!

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:51 (fifteen years ago) link

I second you, and what.

Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:53 (fifteen years ago) link

AW i thought it was ok; bale is awful in it but ledger is p tyte and kinda makes it watchable

cankles, Thursday, 18 December 2008 17:54 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't understand why you are still saying these things to him over and over. you are comnpletely correct, and everything you say is 100% truth bomb but he's just going to come back with some false tautology like "harvey dent is ludicrous because i think his character looked silly with makeup and also i think that maggie gyllenhaal wouldn't be his type anyway" and you're back to square one.

Yeah, arguments based on opinions are like houses on sand.

B.L.A.M., Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:03 (fifteen years ago) link

s1ocki otm once again and can we please not call Tuomas T-bone lolz thx

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:10 (fifteen years ago) link

ive been calling him t-bag for 8 months now

the meth (jodie sweetin ha ha) (and what), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:11 (fifteen years ago) link

ledger is definitely not not self-cutter emo juggaloker on this

You go, Squirrel TM (latebloomer), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:32 (fifteen years ago) link

in this, lol

You go, Squirrel TM (latebloomer), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:32 (fifteen years ago) link

but i can understand not wanting to see this if you didn't dig the first one

You go, Squirrel TM (latebloomer), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:33 (fifteen years ago) link

self-cutter emo juggaloker on dis ting

^likes fanta girls (some dude), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:34 (fifteen years ago) link

ledger is definitely not not self-cutter emo juggaloker on this

I would have hated this movie if that had been the case.

Nicolars (Nicole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:34 (fifteen years ago) link

fwiw Batman Begins left very little impression on me, and i kinda ignored DK hype and saw it at the very end of its theatrical run, and thought it was pretty awesome.

^likes fanta girls (some dude), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Joker blowing up Maggie G. with flammable Faygo I could see, though.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

anyway picked up the DVD the other day, thought the movie still held up. slocki otm, as usual:

this movie is way too long but it has some pretty awesome stuff, i really liked heath ledger as the joker--definitely brings something new to the role, this sort of oopsy little-boy-ness that is deeply creepy. some pretty good set pieces though if it does get way too self-serious by the end. i dug it mostly!

You go, Squirrel TM (latebloomer), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:39 (fifteen years ago) link

The second disc has the IMAX scenes isolated in their original aspect ratio. It's the best way to watch the opening bank heist scene and the batpod/Joker chase.

You go, Squirrel TM (latebloomer), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:45 (fifteen years ago) link

bale is 'awful'?? i def wouldnt go that far

i think this movie is great -- yah a little long but it didnt get in the way -- and i think that s1ocki's concern about it getting 'self serious' at the end actually works in its favor, it feels like a comic book in the same way we talked about casino royale being good because it had long boring parts like a book, lolz

its better than batman begins by a lot, first scene is an incredible opener too -- one of my favorite movies this year. id be surprised if AW wasnt feeling it after watching it but then what do i know

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

The second disc has the IMAX scenes isolated in their original aspect ratio. It's the best way to watch the opening bank heist scene and the batpod/Joker chase.

― You go, Squirrel TM (latebloomer), Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:45 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ya it does that on bluray, cool effect

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 20:54 (fifteen years ago) link

deej the seriousness mostly really bugged me when batman and lucius fox have a big argument about cell phone privacy... like why was that needed in this movie

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 20:54 (fifteen years ago) link

That fed into the overarching "Batman is fucking crazy" narrative that drives the story.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Thursday, 18 December 2008 20:56 (fifteen years ago) link

ya but it was dumb

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i thought that tied into the 'batman does what other people cant do' thing, dark knight vs. white knight overarching premise

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i dont disagree w/ 'self serious', it was pretty 'lonely dude just thinkin big thoughts' but it sort of gave me 'serious comic book philosophy' vibes which wasnt a bad thing imo

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:04 (fifteen years ago) link

or it didnt hurt my enjoyment of it

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:05 (fifteen years ago) link

i just thought it was a dumb time to introduce this whole new conflict with lucius and to have him just bounce so quickly like that... seemed like that was a bigger part of a previous draft or something

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:09 (fifteen years ago) link

also the technology seemed a bit too magical or something... or it just reminded me of like 80s movie techno deus ex machina stuff

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:09 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't know, the entire point of Batman is ninja ass-kicking + magic technology + oh shit he crazy, so that whole thing didn't faze me at all.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:12 (fifteen years ago) link

^likes this post

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:13 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't understand why you are still saying these things to him over and over. you are comnpletely correct, and everything you say is 100% truth bomb but he's just going to come back with some false tautology like "harvey dent is ludicrous because i think his character looked silly with makeup and also i think that maggie gyllenhaal wouldn't be his type anyway" and you're back to square one.

Yeah, arguments based on opinions are like houses on sand.

― B.L.A.M., Thursday, December 18, 2008 1:03 PM (3 hours ago)

because that's clearly the point being made!

also i agree about the cell phone thing! especially since it led to something as ridiculous as that particular technology. it didn't take me out of the movie and make me dislike it (and i honestly forgot about it until it was just brought up) but damn that was eye-rolling. it was just a weird conflict, and then nothing came of them having this conflict, for no reason, and the scene was kind of dumb in the end and it was utterly forgettable.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:15 (fifteen years ago) link

^^ this

was not necessary

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:16 (fifteen years ago) link

it was less the nature of the technology than the narrative shit it kicked off

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:16 (fifteen years ago) link

regardless i think we all agree that AW should see the movie -- its v v good imo

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:17 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah it is worth it for heath ledger sliding down a pile of money and than lighting it on fire as far as i am concerned

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:18 (fifteen years ago) link

it reminded me of the waterboarding scene in iron man, just some shit cummin outta nowhere to make u b like 'hmm this makes me think~'

cankles, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:18 (fifteen years ago) link

nah i mean that'd be like the batman brutality scene in the jail to me, would be analogous.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:19 (fifteen years ago) link

i got a kick out of the movie trying so hard to Say Something about every ongoing conflict in modern usa life 2008. but my taste in that kind of thing is sort of perverse (deadwood lol) so ymmv.

xp heh

joule kilcher (goole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:19 (fifteen years ago) link

The flipside to "oh shit he's crazy" is "but he knows this"; the argument would have escalated had Bruce not made Lucius the custodian of the phone array, but Bruce being smart and generally decent (if crazy) knew he could get use out of it that one time as long as he promised Lucius that he could destroy it once The Joker had been caught. Besides, it's not like he couldn't reresearch and rebuild it at a later point if he didn't want to! The conflict basically was put off because the need go after Joker BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY was paramount.

I basically saw that whole scene (and the bits that led up to it) as foreshadowing for a much more fascist Batman in movie #3 (a move also made easier by his decision to embrace the outlaw role to protect Harvey's reputation/inspirational power).

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:23 (fifteen years ago) link

^likes batgirl

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:23 (fifteen years ago) link

can't lie, ws

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Why does Nolan hate Batgirl/Barbara Gordon so much that he wouldn't even show the child version of her in this movie? That's what I found weird.

Nicolars (Nicole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:41 (fifteen years ago) link

my nightmare of this thread repeating itself wholesale when the DVD was released has come true

except there was less tuomas bashing before

the whole suggest ban thing is turning ilx into some lord of the flies / crucible type shit

Edward III, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:48 (fifteen years ago) link

house of un-suggestiban activities

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:52 (fifteen years ago) link

have you now or have you ever been a member of the troll party

Edward III, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:53 (fifteen years ago) link

BURN THE TROLL BURN HIM

Edward III, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:53 (fifteen years ago) link

once he's gone we'll look for the next nail sticking up

hammer 'em down

's cool

Edward III, Thursday, 18 December 2008 21:54 (fifteen years ago) link

my nightmare of this thread repeating itself wholesale when the DVD was released has come true

except there was less tuomas bashing before

the whole suggest ban thing is turning ilx into some lord of the flies / crucible type shit

― Edward III, Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:48 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

sorry i disagreed with your beloved finn

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 22:10 (fifteen years ago) link

they came for deeznuts and I said nothing etc

Edward III, Thursday, 18 December 2008 22:41 (fifteen years ago) link

The thing that annoyed me about the cell phone tracking thingummy was the visual aspect, it kinda gave me a headache.

Number None, Friday, 19 December 2008 03:14 (fifteen years ago) link

see i think a major fallacy of your argument, tuomas, is the idea that because TDK is dark & serious that it is somehow "realist." it's no more realistic than a joel schumacher batman. there's nothing REALISTIC about any of these movies at all. nolan's is as much a fable as a tim burton batman movie, just in a different key. i agree that superhero stuff works better as fantasy, but fantasy does not have to = goofy or funny. most fables and fairy tales are pretty f'ing dark.

Yes, I do realize DK is a fantasy, just like Burton's Batman is. However, there are different ways of doing a fantasy story. Burton is more interested in using the characters as archetypes and pays less attention to character psychology. Nolan's approach has much more to do with individual psychology; hell, about half of BB was spent explaining the psychological reasons why Bruce Wayne wants to be Batman. Now, I felt that within this more psychological, more "realistic" approach (I'm not using the word "realistic" here to say that DK is less of a fantasy, rather than to describe a certain aesthetic and narrative approach that is more prominent in the Nolan Batman movies than in the Burton movies, and which generally ties with "realism" as applied in art) Dent's transformation to Two-Face didn't feel credible. In less realistic and more fable-like stories, like Burton's Batman movies or many Batman comics, this wouldn't have been an issue, because psychological explanations are less important in them.

Also, when I said that I liked Burton's more fable-like movies more, I didn't mean that I necessarily want Batman to be less dark. Like you said, many fables are very dark, and Burton's movies are dark too, but they're dark in a different way. I feel that the "grim and gritty" approach pioneered by Frank Miller, and followed by many other Batman stories (including Nolan's two films) isn't a particularly good one, because it tries to insert "realistic" themes (such as an individual psychology) and issues (vigilantism, the political implications of Batman's work) into these stories, which is at odds with the inherently fantastic/fable-like nature of the whole idea of superheroes. I think superhero stories work better when they're closer to LotR or Dracula or Star Wars than Dirty Harry.

Tuomas, Friday, 19 December 2008 10:26 (fifteen years ago) link

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Friday, 19 December 2008 10:28 (fifteen years ago) link

Batman's not a superhero.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 December 2008 10:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Eh? He is one of the two or three best known superheroes.

Tuomas, Friday, 19 December 2008 11:04 (fifteen years ago) link

He's a detective, kid.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 December 2008 11:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Normal human being who happens to be a billionaire and a ninja.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 December 2008 11:08 (fifteen years ago) link

No super powers. Which makes him... allegory, or urban legend, rather than myth.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 December 2008 11:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, Burton's Batman (the first one at least) is a horrific narrative mess that makes no sense, a procession of unconvincing aesthetic tropes and miscast ideas that has aged terribly.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 December 2008 11:13 (fifteen years ago) link

No super powers. Which makes him... allegory, or urban legend, rather than myth.

Have you ever read superhero comics? There are a kazillion superheros with no supernatural powers.

Tuomas, Friday, 19 December 2008 11:38 (fifteen years ago) link

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

― K DEF FROM REAL LIVE (deej), Friday, December 19, 2008 11:28 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

special guest stars mark bronson, Friday, 19 December 2008 11:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, Burton's Batman (the first one at least) is a horrific narrative mess that makes no sense, a procession of unconvincing aesthetic tropes and miscast ideas that has aged terribly.

Well yeah, I'm not saying Burton's movie are perfect (though the second one is better than the first, it's the best Batman movie IMO), just that his approach to Batman is better than Nolan's.

Tuomas, Friday, 19 December 2008 11:39 (fifteen years ago) link

I think superhero stories work better when they're closer to LotR or Dracula or Star Wars than Dirty Harry.

http://www.coverbrowser.com/image/captain-america/1-2.jpg

Emergency Rainbow (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 19 December 2008 13:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Having watched this for the first time last night, Tuomas completely OTM here, couldn't agree more!

tomofthenest, Friday, 19 December 2008 13:22 (fifteen years ago) link

No super powers. Which makes him... allegory, or urban legend, rather than myth.

Have you ever read superhero comics? There are a kazillion superheros with no supernatural powers.

― Tuomas, Friday, December 19, 2008 12:38 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

If they don't have super powers, they're not superheroes; they're comicbook characters.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 December 2008 13:27 (fifteen years ago) link

If they don't have super powers, they're not superheroes; they're comicbook characters. masked adventurers.

http://jordanhoffman.com/wp-content/uploads/watchmen-zack-snyder-update-big.jpg

^likes tilt-a-whirls (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 19 December 2008 13:29 (fifteen years ago) link

Good call. Except Ozymandias, who might be considered to have super powers. And that blue dude.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 December 2008 13:40 (fifteen years ago) link

If they don't have super powers, they're not superheroes; they're comicbook characters.

Well, you can call the characters what you want, but I was talking about superhero stories as a genre, and to me it's pretty obvious that characters without superpowers such as Batman, Robin, Green Arrow, or Daredevil are part of the same genre as superpowered characters like Superman, Spiderman, Flash, or Green Lantern. Batman and Spiderman are both masked adventurers with secret identities who devote their lives to fighting crime because a criminal killed their (surrogate) parent(s). The ezistence or lack of powers is not really an essential difference between them.

Tuomas, Friday, 19 December 2008 14:24 (fifteen years ago) link

Daredevil has sonar. Just so long as we're keeping track of powers.

^likes tilt-a-whirls (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 19 December 2008 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link

it's very sweet of Mouthy to give Tuomas a pointless argument to be on the right side of for once as an act of Christmas charity.

e|t|c (some dude), Friday, 19 December 2008 14:38 (fifteen years ago) link

So far we have three super heroes with no super natural powers. I'm not feeling wrong.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 December 2008 15:03 (fifteen years ago) link

And just to be really pedantic, Green Lantern himself has no powers at all. His ring does.

^likes tilt-a-whirls (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 19 December 2008 15:07 (fifteen years ago) link

So far we have three super heroes with no super natural powers. I'm not feeling wrong.

― Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, December 19, 2008 10:03 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

maybe you should spend a little time alone trying to get in touch with your wrongness

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superhero

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 15:08 (fifteen years ago) link

Thread is missing a comicbookguy.jpg

DavidM, Friday, 19 December 2008 15:09 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't like batman begins precisely because its realistic and ludicrous attributes don't jive in a satisfactory manner but TDK doesn't suffer from the same issue due to its stringent policier vibe

I swear I said the same thing 5000 posts ago but clicking on show all messages will probably take down the internet

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 15:10 (fifteen years ago) link

you don't need jpgs when you've got the real thing

xpost

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 15:10 (fifteen years ago) link

If you're going to make an argument that Batman isn't a superhero, it isn't because he has no innate powers; it's because he's an antihero.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Friday, 19 December 2008 15:11 (fifteen years ago) link

(And even that is changing what with our embrace of gritty realism as virtuous in our storytelling)

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Friday, 19 December 2008 15:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I was about to reflexively disagree with you, Dan, but then thought for a second that there's really not much difference between, say, Batman and The Punisher, aside from Bruce Wayne having a respectable public persona.

But if you want to pursue that line of thought, then maybe Iron Man and any post-Civil War registered heroes aside, most comic book heroes are really antiheroes, operating as they do outside the confines of the law.

^likes tilt-a-whirls (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 19 December 2008 15:15 (fifteen years ago) link

and most don't have natural powers of their own!

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 15:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes, I do realize DK is a fantasy, just like Burton's Batman is. However, there are different ways of doing a fantasy story. Burton is more interested in using the characters as archetypes and pays less attention to character psychology. Nolan's approach has much more to do with individual psychology; hell, about half of BB was spent explaining the psychological reasons why Bruce Wayne wants to be Batman. Now, I felt that within this more psychological, more "realistic" approach (I'm not using the word "realistic" here to say that DK is less of a fantasy, rather than to describe a certain aesthetic and narrative approach that is more prominent in the Nolan Batman movies than in the Burton movies, and which generally ties with "realism" as applied in art) Dent's transformation to Two-Face didn't feel credible. In less realistic and more fable-like stories, like Burton's Batman movies or many Batman comics, this wouldn't have been an issue, because psychological explanations are less important in them.

i think it's perfectly fair to not think dent's transformation is credible. i think it's fine myself, because i don't think this movie is aspiring to psychological realism, despite the fact that nolan IS obviously quite interested in the psychology of the batman & his nemeses.

but i don't think his approach is all that different from anyone else; this is a character where the psychological element HAS always been at the forefront, driven by trauma and guilt... i mean, you yourself said that you preferred a more "archetype"-driven approach... don't you know where that term comes from?

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 15:23 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, when I said that I liked Burton's more fable-like movies more, I didn't mean that I necessarily want Batman to be less dark. Like you said, many fables are very dark, and Burton's movies are dark too, but they're dark in a different way. I feel that the "grim and gritty" approach pioneered by Frank Miller, and followed by many other Batman stories (including Nolan's two films) isn't a particularly good one, because it tries to insert "realistic" themes (such as an individual psychology) and issues (vigilantism, the political implications of Batman's work) into these stories, which is at odds with the inherently fantastic/fable-like nature of the whole idea of superheroes.

what would you call pre-frank miller batman if not a vigilante, tuomas??? what is your word for what batman does? i am asking you this as someone who thinks frank miller is god f'ing awful and should shut the hell up forever.

i mean, that is what the character is, and the idea that exploring any implications behind that is somehow inherently at odds with the "fable-like" nature of this particular vigilante "superhero" is really odd to me.

this is all said ignoring the fact that fables are virtually by definition fantastic explorations of political implications of societal actions or morals btw.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 16:11 (fifteen years ago) link

it just seems like there is no room for argument in your world behind hyper-realist psychodramas and fantastic tales and that is why most of us are pretty confused and argue with you, over and over again, on this subject. there's a huge grey area. it's ok to say that you think nolan's films fail; but i think it's unfair to fail them on grounds they aren't trying to achieve.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

this is all said ignoring the fact that fables are virtually by definition fantastic explorations of political implications of societal actions or morals btw.

― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, December 19, 2008 4:11 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

or psychology!

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link

'fables' were meant to explain human behavior through example, psychology before there was such a thing.

god why are we bothering

joule kilcher (goole), Friday, 19 December 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link

we're doing it for batman

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 16:23 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah that is what i mean! i guess by "morals" i was including psychology of the type tuomas is talking about -- i just don't understand what he thinks the word "fable" means and it makes it impossible for me to understand his point, at all.

i mean, i guess his point ultimately is "i like batman to be cartoony" which is fine but what is the rest of this, it is crazy pills. i dunno, it's just that...this is what fables ARE and this all seems so black and white, superheros drive like this etc.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 16:24 (fifteen years ago) link

ugh why did the phrase "we're doing it for batman" immediately put "world in motion" in my head. i'm getting more coffee.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 16:24 (fifteen years ago) link

i remembered loving the burton batman movies until i saw them recently...god...older action movies seem SO stiff and poorly choreographed (the action sequences) compared to post matrix/hong kong influenced stuff...the fights in burton's batman look more like the old tv show or something, makes it hard to watch.

plus nicholson's joker...ug...i hate him mincing around, the old ham

M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, 19 December 2008 16:30 (fifteen years ago) link

batman has a super secret spying device that taps into every cell phone -- he says he needs this thing but he knows it's immoral so he hands the controls to a trusted friend. they use it once and then shut it down, and the friend's trust in batman is forever diminished

^^ how is this not a fable? considering the situation on which it comments (US domestic wiretapping) is still an active controversy ie unfinished ie politicized ie non-narrative. the fact that it's 'modern' or 'dark' or whatever doesn't stop it from being a simple moral tale.

joule kilcher (goole), Friday, 19 December 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link

it involves cell phones instead of donkeys going up a hill or something so it's not a fable hellooooooooooo

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link

so let me get this straight if batman and morgan freeman were arguing over a donkey going up a hill it would be a fable

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 16:57 (fifteen years ago) link

only if Morgan Freeman gets eaten by a wolf dressed as his grandmother

There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 19 December 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

plus nicholson's joker...ug...i hate him mincing around, the old ham

― M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, December 19, 2008 11:30 AM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

fuck you dude is hilarious in that movie.... you sound like you been using BRAND X!!!!!

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

nah Matt is right and the first movie is really terrible (not all Nicholson's fault at all - really he's the best thing in it, probably. Which is kinda sad). Its weird how such a shitty movie kicked off this whole Hollywood-loves-comic-books thing that has dominated for the last 20 years.

There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:05 (fifteen years ago) link

i think it's a good movie. michael keaton just kickin it reminds me of rdj in iron man.

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:06 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah Shakey, it was "shitty," you could comprehend what was going on.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:07 (fifteen years ago) link

can't argue with that

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:07 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah Shakey, it was "shitty," you could comprehend what was going on.

lolz what the first movie makes next to no sense!

There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:08 (fifteen years ago) link

seriously I don't even know where to begin

There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:08 (fifteen years ago) link

anybody repping for batman begins over the o.g. 89 batman can basically suck my fuccin balls

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:08 (fifteen years ago) link

i know that my standards of film are just whether or not i can comprehend the dynamics on the screen.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:09 (fifteen years ago) link

spying on 30 million people using a donkey wasn't in my job description batmaaaaahhhhhhh no grandma nooooo

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

basically this clip >>>> your entire life, shakey mo collier

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

seriously, let's break this down to real talk: who the fuck are these ppl who cannot comprehend the action/plot/storyline of ANY of the batman films? i mean even batman forever, for god's sake. if you can't comprehend these films then there is something wrong with you and maybe you need to do some sudoku or brain age or something, exercise that mind keep it fresh etc. no exceptions. they are not rocket science.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:11 (fifteen years ago) link

if you think some myspace angle shot andy dick soundalike joker beats that seriously go kill yourself

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:12 (fifteen years ago) link

ALLY OTM

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:12 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe i was being too hard on nicholson, but doesn't anyone else start to get bored with older 80s action flicks sometimes...like just in terms of ACTION, it's all so stiff.

i actually like Keaton a lot, I pretty much think he one of the most underrated actors.

i didn't feel like burton's batman was hard to understand. just parts seemed kinda stagey and stiff IMO. (like all the action parts)

M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:13 (fifteen years ago) link

if you think some myspace angle shot andy dick soundalike joker beats that seriously go kill yourself

― Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, December 19, 2008 12:12 PM (51 seconds ago)

^^^ dude i don't even know what you mean by this but quite frankly i DO think that description actually sounds f'ing hilarious and beats jack nicholson.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:14 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean ok i havent seen dark knight but im watching clips right now

what the fuck is this? this isnt funny

meanwhile this flashback from the mostly boring batman beyond movie is the best shit ever (warning 10 minute long video but its super fkn awesome)

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:14 (fifteen years ago) link

lol i pasted the wrong youtube clip up there i meant this dark knight video

okay.... joker?

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link

needs a prince song

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link

crap, crap, crap, crap, crap... THIS, i like

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:15 (fifteen years ago) link

"vicki waiting" is a good song

anyway i liked dark knight.

M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link

the biggest problem with burton's first batman is that is such a terrible prince song that i can't get past it

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:16 (fifteen years ago) link

wasn't morbz making the point that nu-batman sux cause of all the fast-moving whatnots

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:17 (fifteen years ago) link

lol you whippersnappers and your fast-cut action sequences in my day we just had claymation out-of-scale monkeys chasin girls and we were happy with it goddamnit

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:18 (fifteen years ago) link

maybe i was being too hard on nicholson, but doesn't anyone else start to get bored with older 80s action flicks sometimes...like just in terms of ACTION, it's all so stiff.

road warrior, always fresh

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:18 (fifteen years ago) link

i like fast moving whatnots and stuff that looks rad ninja stylee

M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:19 (fifteen years ago) link

really every morbz could just be replaced with "you whippersnappers"

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:19 (fifteen years ago) link

YESSSSSSSSS... action sequences edited by Cuisinart where one cannot tell who is where doing what to whom are well-fucked. Keep it on yr joystick.

also Batcave dweller ian says TDK "dragged a bit" -- DANGER

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean ok i havent seen dark knight but im watching clips right now

wait, you haven't seen TDK

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link

Keep it on yr joystick.

^^^ haha how rude, don't make this thread dirty

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:20 (fifteen years ago) link

no dogg i talk about that upthread

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:21 (fifteen years ago) link

Keep it on yr joystick.

LOL this is the most cranky old man shit basically ever

the sun just sent me a text (gbx), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:21 (fifteen years ago) link

didnt wanna see it cuz i hated batman begins + it looked supergay

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:21 (fifteen years ago) link

^stopped clock, right

retroactive Oscar for Jim Carrey's Riddler plz

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:22 (fifteen years ago) link

morbs, the thing is, i am nearsighted, don't play video games, and can happily sit thru any manners of films, and i could still follow what was going on in the action sequences in these movies.

retroactive Oscar for Jim Carrey's Riddler plz

^^^^ kiu :D

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:22 (fifteen years ago) link

The point of the Joker isn't that he's funny and if that is your only metric for measuring his performance, you don't actually understand the character; even super-hammy Jack Nicholson's Joker was more than "haha I'm crazy".

Also, Ledger's Joker is often hilarious in the movie and most of his funniest scenes come about in direct contrast to other things happening in the movie.

retroactive Oscar for Jim Carrey's Riddler plz

I liked Carrey's Riddler but this is really fucking wrong.

^likes black girls (HI DERE), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:22 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah but ian's favorite album consists of 50 minutes of some new zealanders hoovering their carpet

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

really do think everybody should watch this clip mark hamill >>> all yall

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:23 (fifteen years ago) link

haha the pencil scene was hilarious to me btw and also yeah if you are just watching batman for lolz then that is fair enough but again this falls under what i said to tuomas: what do you think these characters are exactly, and is it fair to fault films because of something they're not actually TRYING to be?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:24 (fifteen years ago) link

"Also, Ledger's Joker is often hilarious in the movie and most of his funniest scenes come about in direct contrast to other things happening in the movie."

youtube or gtfo, all the shit people told me was funny wasnt funny whereas im l-a-f-f laffin right now thinking about "he's at home WASHIN HIS TIGHTS!!!!"

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:24 (fifteen years ago) link

i watched the pencil scene on youtube back when tdk 1st dropped and didnt get it, maybe its funnier in the context of this boring ass movie full of uptight tards like christian bale and aaron ekhart

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:25 (fifteen years ago) link

dude nothing anyone says about this is going to make you laugh because the funny shit his joker doesn't isn't OMG LOOK AT ME I AM WAAAAAAAAACKY HILARIOUS!!! which seems to be what you want out of this character.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:25 (fifteen years ago) link

why dont you see the movie instead of judging it from like 3 clips on youtube

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:26 (fifteen years ago) link

his joker doesn't? his joker DOES

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:26 (fifteen years ago) link

best bisexual Latino Joker:

http://www.the-isb.com/images/SurfJamsJoker2.jpg

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:27 (fifteen years ago) link

why dont you see the movie instead of judging it from like 3 clips on youtube

― s1ocki, Friday, December 19, 2008 12:26 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

because it looks supergay and i hated batman begins and nobody on this thread can make a good case for it beyond making it sound like the matrix or some shit

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:27 (fifteen years ago) link

im sure you've already made up your mind to hate it so maybe dont bother... but way to ruin a movie before you've already seen it!!

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:28 (fifteen years ago) link

this is like the argument with tuomas, there's a place in the world for both types of films and if you prefer one to the other that's cool but let's not turn this into a "this is not the ethos of the batman" argument except about the joker.

xpost i don't get why you are on a thread, specifically about a movie you haven't seen, because it's weird to come onto a thraed and be like "this other vaguely related movie is so much better i am guessing" tho i guess it wouldn't be ilx without retarded bs all the time.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:28 (fifteen years ago) link

"you know guys i haven't seen the curious case of benjamin button but it looks mad fuckin gay and here is a youtube clip of 12 monkeys and brad pitt seems way funnier in this shit"

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I hated batmang begins too but you should see TDK and not on some compressed to fuckshit youtube clips

it doesn't bring the lulz tho it's bummer alley

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:29 (fifteen years ago) link

is this like the first time u guys have ever met ethan? he called in sick today and hes bored

beyonc'e (max), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:30 (fifteen years ago) link

"you know guys i haven't seen the curious case of benjamin button but it looks mad fuckin gay and here is a youtube clip of 12 monkeys and brad pitt seems way funnier in this shit"

― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, December 19, 2008 12:29 PM (9 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i dunno this sounds fair to me too

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:30 (fifteen years ago) link

i'm having a slow day at work max and am passing the time by my time-honored tradition of baiting ethan dude.

xpost ok it was a bad example fine

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:31 (fifteen years ago) link

lol xp dont worry ima go get hangover cheeseburger i a minute so yall can jackoff sesh about juggaloker in peace + quiet

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:31 (fifteen years ago) link

you know guys i haven't seen the curious case of benjamin button but it looks mad fuckin gay and here is a youtube clip of 12 monkeys and brad pitt seems way funnier in this shit

I was gonna say what about this is not true but ethan beat me to it

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:32 (fifteen years ago) link

Morbz and and what finally agree - they hate a movie neither of them have seen

seriously gtfo this thread with that bullshit

There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:32 (fifteen years ago) link

juggaloker is completely unfair, i don't think he's ever even seen faygo.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:32 (fifteen years ago) link

xp: we both saw Batman Begins

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:33 (fifteen years ago) link

juggaloker sounds like a morbs-ism too

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:33 (fifteen years ago) link

fwiw morbs i thought the action cutting in batman begins was really lame too but dude stepped up his game for this one.

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:34 (fifteen years ago) link

shakey, go see Seven Pounds

ethan is my Fight Club Pitt alterego, only he turned out more like Arnold Stang

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:34 (fifteen years ago) link

see what does that even mean? it's hilarious but what does it really mean.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:35 (fifteen years ago) link

ethan i understand being so skeptical of a hyped movie that you want to not see it and still be able to piss all over it, but at a certain point you can't have your cake and eat it too. see the movie or stfu.

grinchyschneider (some dude), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:35 (fifteen years ago) link

ledger's joker is funny, but funny in the same way that ddl was funny when he said YOU WILL BELIEVE ME WHEN I SAY I AM AN OILMAN~

imo

cankles, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:35 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean this is why i only trolled the Borat thread for a few posts and then moved on.

grinchyschneider (some dude), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:35 (fifteen years ago) link

ledger's joker is funny, but funny in the same way that ddl was funny when he said YOU WILL BELIEVE ME WHEN I SAY I AM AN OILMAN~

^^^ i still have not seen this movie because i feel like i can't quite take ddl seriously at all but it's supposed to be serious

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:38 (fifteen years ago) link

but i mean when friends of mine are all saying dramatically like "I WILL DRINK YR MILKSHAKES!" and it's supposedly a serious good cinema treat i am like wtf i don't think i can handle that.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:39 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean effectively they made it sound like every scene was the "i've made every mistake a middle aged man can make" faux-pep-talk al pacino gives in any given sunday quite frankly.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:39 (fifteen years ago) link

wait are you asserting that TWBB isnt supposed to be funny

cankles, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:40 (fifteen years ago) link

actually, PT Barnum-Anderson said he wanted to hear people laff at DDL. but it's still "serious"

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:40 (fifteen years ago) link

thats why there will be blood is so good, its funny in that weird way

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:40 (fifteen years ago) link

xp

s1ocki, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:40 (fifteen years ago) link

i didnt think it was that good btw but i think it is like... a comedy that makes u think

like robocop

cankles, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:41 (fifteen years ago) link

xp: except for the last 20 mins, which just stink

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:42 (fifteen years ago) link

i don't know what i'm asserting!! i'm asking for guidance i guess because i thought it was a serious movie and not supposed to be funny but i can't even look at ddl w/o laughing tbh. you guys are reassuring me but i'm still not sure that i wouldn't rather just watch any given sunday

xpost lol @ robocop

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:42 (fifteen years ago) link

actually in all honesty maybe this is just a bigger ish in general: ddl is just inherently hilarious to me, by existing

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:43 (fifteen years ago) link

i <3'd twbb btw

and robocop

and the pacino speech in ags

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link

schef I haven't seen the football movie but Screaming Al is spot-on funnyserious in Angels in America

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link

Dr Morbius, aren't YOU supergay?

the pinefox, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:44 (fifteen years ago) link

not to change the subject or anything but I would rep for batman 1966 over burton batschlang

that stuff is pure gold

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:45 (fifteen years ago) link

xp: except for the last 20 mins, which just stink

― Dr Morbius, Friday, December 19, 2008 5:42 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is obviously otm. there are loads of films that are ruined by their ending. but are there any where the ending saves a film that would otherwise be terrible?

caek, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:46 (fifteen years ago) link

morbius you should probably not watch "the football movie" because it is the definition of a movie you'd hate.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:46 (fifteen years ago) link

also saying ddl is any more inadvertantly hilarious than al fucking pacino who in fact invented the game is kinda nuts

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:47 (fifteen years ago) link

"I wanna watch scarface but pacino seems to be overacting a little"

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

i hated batman begins

man that's too bad, this is a tight movie. it's only half-heartedly a batman movie tho

joule kilcher (goole), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

LIFE...IS A GAMEOFINCHES. SO IS FOOTBALL. BECAUSE...INEITHERGAME...LIFE OR FOOTBALL...THE MARGIN OF ERROR IS SO! SMALL!

xpost i find ddl more inherently hilarious than al pacino because i have never seen anything in which ddl wasn't just a completely ludicrous presence to me whereas i have seen movies in which al pacino was not just like lol-worthy what is this

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:49 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean i know pacino invented this game but i've never seen ddl not be playin it. plus he does it in this poncier fashion by dint of having a different face and voice than pacino.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link

THAT'S WHAT LIVIN IS...THE SIX INCHES IN FRONT OF YR FACE!

^^^ btw that's what she said, al pacino!

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link

that was sneaky of him having a different face and voice than pacino

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:51 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't mind middling comic-book movies, but graphic-novel movies do make me long for Adam West.

I dunno schef, I dislike skateboarding and drag queens but liked Lords of Dogtown & Paris Is Burning.

DDL is funnier in interviews: "I researched oilmen from 100 years ago so I could do a John Huston impression for 3 hours"

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:51 (fifteen years ago) link

why do you ppl never have 2-year threads about Chinatown?

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Dr Morbius, aren't YOU supergay?

― the pinefox, Friday, December 19, 2008 12:44 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is cracking me the fuck up right now

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:51 (fifteen years ago) link

that was sneaky of him having a different face and voice than pacino

― Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, December 19, 2008 12:51 PM

i wish he wouldn't do that basically

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:52 (fifteen years ago) link

morbz do u like north dallas 40? c'mon mac davis + football it's golden!

M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:53 (fifteen years ago) link

why do you ppl never have 2-year threads about Chinatown?

um internet was not around in 1973 yo

There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:54 (fifteen years ago) link

morbius i could go revive the chinatown thread and move our al pacino v ddl conversation over there if you like

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:56 (fifteen years ago) link

http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/arpanet-5.jpg
check it out dave, some asshole is saying he's glad LBJ died

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:56 (fifteen years ago) link

what's wrong with YOU today Shakes? Chinatown is around now. New is the new boring.

I never saw North Dallas 40 OR Semi-Tough. Paper Lion, yes.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:58 (fifteen years ago) link

how about little giants?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 17:58 (fifteen years ago) link

why don't we all stay here and talk about chinatown

man does that one scene make my nose hurt

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 17:59 (fifteen years ago) link

Chinatown carries on existing in...Chinatown

grinchyschneider (some dude), Friday, 19 December 2008 18:00 (fifteen years ago) link

I watched The Last Detail last night if you wanna talk about that.

caek, Friday, 19 December 2008 18:00 (fifteen years ago) link

don't bother, it's chinatown

Dr. Yakubius (and what), Friday, 19 December 2008 18:01 (fifteen years ago) link

the original longest yard is unfuckwitable too, but i'm pretty pro-70s burt reynolds in general

M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, 19 December 2008 18:01 (fifteen years ago) link

in hell satan will make morbz watch remember the titans for 6000 years

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 18:01 (fifteen years ago) link

hey look I love Chinatown and have seen it many times but there's like 30 years worth of stuff written about it already.

There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 19 December 2008 18:01 (fifteen years ago) link

the best football movie is far and away gus, the tale of an eastern european donkey coming to america to join don knotts's football team to become its star placekicker. johnny unitas and dick butkis are in this movie, and of course the donkey is a natural star. i really highly recommend this film, it's a good fable. about donkeys and football.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 18:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Bloggers have written 30 years worth of stuff about TDK in the last 6 months.

I like The Longest Yard, but then it's a Robert Aldrich film about Watergate, right?

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 18:05 (fifteen years ago) link

I saw gus at the drive-in

why does everything come back to donkeys with you

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 18:06 (fifteen years ago) link

don knotts had such a good run in the 70s

apple dumpling gang, no deposit no return, gus

he's like the john cazale nobody talks about

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 18:09 (fifteen years ago) link

my mom once owned a donkey, it's an area of mystery and folklore to me

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 19 December 2008 18:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Gus might be left out of TCM's shitload of live-action Disney films this month. isn't Ed Asner in it?

Dr Morbius, Friday, 19 December 2008 18:12 (fifteen years ago) link

yes lou grant is indeed in gus

I wish my parents had owned barnyard animals but no, just some lowly sea monkeys

Edward III, Friday, 19 December 2008 18:18 (fifteen years ago) link

There's a really, really grating, obvious, fuck-up cut / edit / synch issue in the conversation between Alfred and Bruce near the start when Bruce is stitching up his dog-bite. Really irritates now. Why leave this blatant bad edit in an otherwise fastidious film?

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 31 December 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link

We did the Batmarathon last night, btw; Batman Begins and The Dark Knight back-to-back. Unsure which I prefer.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 31 December 2008 16:38 (fifteen years ago) link

ethans trolling here is C- fwiw

n-e-wayz i think the cell phone thing didnt bother me at all, i didnt see it as a last-minute jump for political relevence but the logical endpoint of the entire movie's struggle to define the boundaries of batman's ethical behavior, to what degree he operates within the confines of morality but outside of the system we've set up that is supposed to be enforcing our own morality ... it felt pretty logical w/in the grounds of every successively difficult decision batman was forced to make the more joker ratcheted up the ethical dilemmas ... i also think that this is perfectly 'comic book'-ish approach, & a good friend whose real into this stuff said something about how Nolan had Batman building a precursor to Brother Eye which i guess means something if u read lots of comixx

choom gangsta (deej), Sunday, 4 January 2009 11:08 (fifteen years ago) link

i definitely prefer tdk to batman begins

choom gangsta (deej), Sunday, 4 January 2009 11:09 (fifteen years ago) link

i dont really get anything remotely 'andy dick' about heath ledger in this movie at all -- weirdly enough it reminded me of tom waits voice & mannerisms in interviews

choom gangsta (deej), Sunday, 4 January 2009 11:09 (fifteen years ago) link

this was The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance for amoral 12-year-olds.

Dr Morbius, Saturday, 17 January 2009 20:26 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah!!!! cool, huh?

WmC, Saturday, 17 January 2009 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link

in an otherwise fastidious film?

loooooooooooool

Dr Morbius, Saturday, 17 January 2009 20:53 (fifteen years ago) link

how did you feel about The Prestige, Morbius?

ryan, Saturday, 17 January 2009 23:18 (fifteen years ago) link

didnt see it.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 19 January 2009 23:26 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

omg, I knew Ledger's Joker reminded me of someone specific, but never realized who until I stumbled on a post-Oscar blog comment:

http://www.nndb.com/people/476/000022410/Franken_Al.jpg

Dr Morbius, Monday, 9 March 2009 00:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes, he's doing Stuart Smalley.

EZ Snappin, Monday, 9 March 2009 00:22 (fifteen years ago) link

no, Clintonite Fuckhead Franken

Dr Morbius, Monday, 9 March 2009 00:23 (fifteen years ago) link

goddamn morbs

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Monday, 9 March 2009 01:14 (fifteen years ago) link

one month passes...

Watched Candy last night, ledger's indie Aussie drug romance film from 2006 - very good. Didn't seem AT ALL like the guy who played either Ennis Del Mar or The Joker, to Ledger's great, and sad, credit. Something MENTAL struck me, though - if Nolan did want The Joker in a third film and was to recast the role, then Joseph Gordon-Levitt might just be perfect.

― Scik Mouthy, Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:08 AM (8 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

And Christopher Nolan has just cast Gordon-Levitt in his new film, Inception. All hail me.

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 6 May 2009 12:21 (fourteen years ago) link

is he playing the Joker in it?

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Wednesday, 6 May 2009 12:27 (fourteen years ago) link

Haha, no, but rumour has it it's "in preparation for" playing the Joker.

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 6 May 2009 12:52 (fourteen years ago) link

unlikely, since apparently they only went with Gordon-Levitt because James Franco is booked.

Simon H., Wednesday, 6 May 2009 13:02 (fourteen years ago) link

after seeing dude in brick it's easy to see him take over.

Old Big 'OOS (AKA the Cupwinner) (darraghmac), Wednesday, 6 May 2009 13:09 (fourteen years ago) link

four months pass...

I read the first 50 pages then skipped through th rest so sorry if this has been brought up before but...

Who say _Batman_ is The Dark Knight?!?!?!?

And no one has mentioned chess yet????????

mei, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 00:51 (fourteen years ago) link

kill yourself

holosystolic murmur and the thrill (gbx), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 01:11 (fourteen years ago) link

Why?

mei, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 01:12 (fourteen years ago) link

because you are stupid! XD

holosystolic murmur and the thrill (gbx), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 01:13 (fourteen years ago) link

That's not a very good reason though is it? I mean, on that basis most people should have killed themselves years ago, you included.

mei, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 01:14 (fourteen years ago) link

this thread is about a movie, not a book!

holosystolic murmur and the thrill (gbx), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 01:16 (fourteen years ago) link

i do not think you should kill yrself, but srsly what in the hell are you talking about with this chess business and 50 pages of a movie

holosystolic murmur and the thrill (gbx), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 01:17 (fourteen years ago) link

If there's no dark knights in chess, I've been playing it wrong.

EVERYBODY WANNA BOOOOO ME BUT I’M A FAN OF REAL POP CULTURE! (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 01:39 (fourteen years ago) link

ugh, Joker Gordon-Levitt may be the grossest and least likely casting fan fiction about the next movie to date

Autogoon Almanac (some dude), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 02:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Saw some of this again in a bar w/ sound off (subtitles) a couple weeks ago... "You complete me" may be the only funny Joker line (and what does that ref say about the culture).

A Patch on Blazing Saddles (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 04:14 (fourteen years ago) link

lol mei i am sorry for bein a dick, i thought you were a random googler, ripe for clowning

holosystolic murmur and the thrill (gbx), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 04:53 (fourteen years ago) link

thank you for letting me put down the weight of kanye

a random googler, ripe for clowning (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 05:07 (fourteen years ago) link

They're called black knights, not dark.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:27 (fourteen years ago) link

its only a finn wound

both HOOSlarious and truthful (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:35 (fourteen years ago) link

african american knights

a random googler, ripe for clowning (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 22 September 2009 18:41 (fourteen years ago) link

Anyone know which writer starting using the term "Dark Knight Detective" to refer to Batman though? I have a feeling it came into wider use in the 70's sometime.

Number None, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 23:08 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, Neal Adams era. Not sure which writer though.

chap, Tuesday, 22 September 2009 23:59 (fourteen years ago) link

If it was Neal Adams era, I guess it would have been Denny O'Neil. I was thinking it was later -- Englehart.

Internet says that the first usage was by Bill Finger in 1940, but I'm not sure about "wider use."

Hugh Manatee (WmC), Wednesday, 23 September 2009 00:09 (fourteen years ago) link

one month passes...

Talking to my neighbor's 13 year old son today, he told me that Dane Cook is Christopher Nolan's choice to play the Joker in the next movie.

The fact that kids come up with these comic-bizarre casting rumors and spread them like the cold is something from childhood I had forgotten about.

Cunga, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 03:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Heath Ledger died from cooties :-(

fel (latebloomer), Wednesday, 18 November 2009 03:33 (fourteen years ago) link

"Would you like to see how I got these scars? When I was little I kissed a girl."

Cunga, Wednesday, 18 November 2009 03:40 (fourteen years ago) link

one month passes...

http://i.imgur.com/nT3b8.jpg

doomed... to fart (cankles), Monday, 11 January 2010 17:21 (fourteen years ago) link

haaaaaa

free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Monday, 11 January 2010 17:24 (fourteen years ago) link

holy shit

Hell is other people. In an ILE film forum. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 11 January 2010 17:27 (fourteen years ago) link

good thing he didnt have his golf clubs handy

Rage, Resentment, Spleen (Dr Morbius), Monday, 11 January 2010 17:28 (fourteen years ago) link

oh that is so goddamned funny

lazy cold meat and chocolate seasonal mentality (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 05:20 (fourteen years ago) link

that has made my fuckin' night

latebloomer, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 05:34 (fourteen years ago) link

Hahahahaaaa

.81818181818181818181818181 changed everything (jjjusten), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 05:39 (fourteen years ago) link

Apparently this stunt was done immediately after Nicholson learned of Ledger's death, so the obvious contempt in his face has a rather different meaning than we'd take from it now. And yet...

Simon H., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 05:46 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah, that photo was around a day or two after Ledger kicked it

Kate Sinclair (sic), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 05:52 (fourteen years ago) link

uh that photo is a photoshop job, guys.

sean gramophone, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 06:58 (fourteen years ago) link

more like ~you~ are a photoshop

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 07:00 (fourteen years ago) link

more like

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 07:01 (fourteen years ago) link

pssh. next thing you know he'll say santa isn't real.

la última intimidad (latebloomer), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 07:02 (fourteen years ago) link

watched this at someones house recently. apart from ledger, its still really overrated. trying way too hard to be dark and takes itself far too seriously. also way too long (why do people think epic=mark of quality?). easily the most humorless of all the batman films. a good redress to what they did with the franchise before batman and robin etc so i understand the context but its just too far in the opposite direction. gotham still looks quite pedestrain compared to tim burtons gotham too. not sure how this type of indulgent/bloated 'serious' blockbuster (watchman etc) obsessed with being weighty and 'important' (rather than fun) ended up being so feted. trying to think of what the precedents were.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:22 (fourteen years ago) link

i suppose it being all heavy rather than fun is diff from the blockbuster norm but the heaviness just seems too contrived, its gravely aspirational heaviness.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:23 (fourteen years ago) link

As I've said before, there are plenty of moments in this that make me lol. And in Watchmen too.

exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:25 (fourteen years ago) link

watchmen is pretty camp and entertaining, and it has lots of jokes

jabba hands, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:30 (fourteen years ago) link

did like his new vehicles though.

the batmobile was>>>>

did lol at the trip to hong kong as it reminded me of the adam west series but not sure if that was a good lol or not.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:30 (fourteen years ago) link

I thought there was lots of good, character-based humour all the way through; plenty of lines from Caine, obviously, but also quite a few from bale. The meeting with Eckhardt & Gyllenhall in the restaurant is great.

exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:34 (fourteen years ago) link

apart from ledger, its still really overrated. trying way too hard to be dark and takes itself far too seriously. also way too long

agree with all of that, but there were still some nice lols as nick says. still think watchmen was better (more consistent, funnier, looks better, more successful in what it was trying to do).

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:36 (fourteen years ago) link

top lol was bruce wayne "should i go to the hospital?"

Isambard Kingdom Buñuel (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:36 (fourteen years ago) link

easily the most humorless of all the batman films.

um waht? the ledge was hilarious.

free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:38 (fourteen years ago) link

i think that was on the understanding that ledger aside, maybe not

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:46 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm finding this really watchable on HBO in bits and pieces, though Bale's Batman voice (and Oldman's speech at the end) gets worse each time you hear it (starting to wonder if he made it intentionally absurd so they'd let him spend more time with the mask off - which he does). At this point I'd probably say its my favorite Batman film not just named Batman.

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:00 (fourteen years ago) link

The only thing overrated in that film is Ledger!!

Radio Birdman Rally (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:01 (fourteen years ago) link

xpost - yeah the speech is a bit silly (and also lazy on nolans part - actually that was my other prob with the film, a lot of it seemed too expository). and batmans voice is preposterous but also gets a few lols. (well from me, but not the batman fans i saw it with).

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:04 (fourteen years ago) link

but as far as aspirational heaviness, I'll take it over all the Ra's Al Ghul ("My anger outweighs my guilt") talk of the last movie. Plus slimy Eric Roberts >>>> Tom Wilkinson declaring "you've never tasted desperate!" and Maggie Gyllenhaal >>>>>>>> Katie Holmes.

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:06 (fourteen years ago) link

while i think ledger's performance is what keeps people connected to the movie as it bounces from set piece to set piece and melodramatic discussion to melodramatic discussion, I wonder how it would have been received if he hadn't died. It's engaging enough didn't really think about his passing much when I saw the film - only later did I think about what a shame it is that there's nothing to follow it, but (and i'm trying to find a way to say this without being in poor taste) the effect probably would have been diluted if Ledger was smiling at premieres and around to answer questions like "why is your character so awesome?"

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:12 (fourteen years ago) link

eric roberts is hilarious and i wish he was in every movie, but in no universe is he better than tom wilkinson

doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:13 (fourteen years ago) link

he is as a cartoon mobster

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:14 (fourteen years ago) link

Batman voice ...... gets worse each time you hear it

i had this, until someone on ilx just posited that bruce wayne doesn't want his voice to be recognisable in any way. makes it a lot easier to watch just to think that way about it.

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:39 (fourteen years ago) link

you'd think he'd want to be easily understood, though

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:40 (fourteen years ago) link

DOES HE THOUGH????

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:40 (fourteen years ago) link

makes ya think

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:40 (fourteen years ago) link

can't be too hard to build a vocoder into that suit

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:41 (fourteen years ago) link

t-wayne

Player is killed, but they are resurrected, and the 45 Revolver glow gold (dyao), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:42 (fourteen years ago) link

i think i underrated this movie at the time; on reflection, the set-pieces, at least early on, were simply better done than the cut-to-shred crap you get from most blockbusters. it is too long, though, and the final thing where batters taps into the matrix or whatever sucked.

free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:43 (fourteen years ago) link

the people in the boats should have blown themselves up, let's face it.

Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:45 (fourteen years ago) link

wow totally did not even recognize Eric Roberts when I saw this

larry craig memorial gloryhole (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:13 (fourteen years ago) link

i think i underrated this movie at the time; on reflection, the set-pieces, at least early on, were simply better done than the cut-to-shred crap you get from most blockbusters. it is too long, though, and the final thing where batters taps into the matrix or whatever sucked.

― free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Tuesday, January 12, 2010 8:43 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i agree with this pretty much. the truck set piece was pretty awesome. the supersonic cell phone reality device and the dumb plot point about the ethical conflict it posed was ridiculous.

also the boat thing.

and it really does go on way too long.

but that IMAX stuff in the theater was like sheeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:20 (fourteen years ago) link

Batman Begins is better, it's a smart, slick action film that doesn't park itself in the middle of a convoluted moral maze from which it has no clue how to remove itself.

BTW, I'm frightfully middle-class (chap), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:23 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm all for big entertainment dabbling in big ideas, but it should be done in a less ham-fisted and muddled way than in The Dark Knight. This isn't to say I didn't enjoy a lot about the film.

BTW, I'm frightfully middle-class (chap), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:25 (fourteen years ago) link

batman begins = great first 1/2, kinda goes downhill once he actually becomes batman. dude learned how to do actions scenes better for TDK.

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:26 (fourteen years ago) link

the truck set piece WAS surprisingly good - i think the problem with most action scenes w/batman is that the suit is so bulky and impractical you end up having to shoot around it

doomed... to fart (cankles), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:32 (fourteen years ago) link

I'd have to watch it again to be sure, but I think the opening heist might well be the best set-piece.

BTW, I'm frightfully middle-class (chap), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:34 (fourteen years ago) link

no batsuit in that !

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:37 (fourteen years ago) link

The opening heist is really well-choreographed and filmed, it really can stand alone outside of the movie

mh, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

it did!

remember when they showed it instead of a trailer

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:51 (fourteen years ago) link

I really need to rewatch this movie; I wonder if I'd like it as much the second time.

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 17:52 (fourteen years ago) link

most action scenes w/batman is that the suit is so bulky and impractical you end up having to shoot around it

He really is just a walking poo that talks like cookie monster. Too bad they offed every supporting character that's younger than Gary Oldman - unless they bring in a bunch of new stars Batman himself actually has to be awesome next time.

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:13 (fourteen years ago) link

think they're gonna do robin?

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:14 (fourteen years ago) link

i think bat man is going to "do" robin....................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

max, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:15 (fourteen years ago) link

i can't imagine christopher nolan going there. but as much as catwoman seems obvious (sexual tension would be a new element), bale could NOT do his colicky thing when bantering with her in costume.

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:15 (fourteen years ago) link

lol xpost

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:16 (fourteen years ago) link

They should skip Robin and go straight to Nightwing

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:16 (fourteen years ago) link

go "straight" to night wing more like go.... "not straight" to night wing......................!!!!!!!!!!!!

max, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:18 (fourteen years ago) link

("gay")

max, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:19 (fourteen years ago) link

killing joke more like gay homos

― Esteban Buttez!!, Thursday, July 7, 2005 2:33 AM (4 years ago) Bookmark

chartres (goole), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:22 (fourteen years ago) link

They should skip Robin and go straight to Nightwing

― living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, January 12, 2010 1:16 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

is this a joke or

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:23 (fourteen years ago) link

It's serious. Change the Nightwing character to be a competing vigilante rather than a former protogee and put the two of them in conflict; alternately, if Batman already has a competing anti-hero in the comics, use that character instead (not familiar enough with the Batman rogue's gallery to know if there's someone who fits that bill aside from Catwoman and I am kind of DO NOT WANT re: more sexual bat-tension).

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:28 (fourteen years ago) link

i think both of the nolan batman flicks have dope, for the most part, occasional ridiculousness aside. i've liked all the villains so far and i like this presentation of gotham more than the burton ones, but then again i'm not really a big burton fan either.

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link

i'd rather see a lovely lady prancing around the rooftops than other grim-faced bro

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link

xp

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link

("than another")

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link

The opening heist is really well-choreographed and filmed, it really can stand alone outside of the movie

― mh, Tuesday, January 12, 2010 11:51 AM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah, i've actually re-watched the opening heist a few times, just cuz

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:29 (fourteen years ago) link

ugh I appear to be suggesting they use red Hood, which um no vigilantes named after the clitoris in my movies, plz

xp: I agree on a base level re: "moar lovely ladies plz" but I don't think the story is as interesting, mostly because we've already seen Burton's version of it in "Batman Returns" (also IMO Burton's best film).

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link

alternately, if Batman already has a competing anti-hero in the comics, use that character instead (not familiar enough with the Batman rogue's gallery to know if there's someone who fits that bill aside from Catwoman and I am kind of DO NOT WANT re: more sexual bat-tension)

Ben Foster is....ANARKY!!!

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link

actually Anarky might be interesting

xp: lol I swear I just looked this dude up and read about him

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:34 (fourteen years ago) link

The Burton films have unbelievable art direction but kind've rubbish stories. The first one barely has a plot at all; Batman and The Joker have a few fights, that's it.

BTW, I'm frightfully middle-class (chap), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:39 (fourteen years ago) link

an anarky-based plot would allow them to acknowledge a lot of minor entries in the rogue's gallery, something i wish more superhero films would do in a montage or something. have him trying to bump off a stream of flamboyant crimebosses and thugs who took on goofy identities after the joker's cultural moment (ventriloquist, maxie zeus, mad hatter, etc).

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:45 (fourteen years ago) link

I'd love to see Anarky in the next Batman movie, but he's probaby considered too corny for Nolan's "dark" Batman.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:10 (fourteen years ago) link

That makes absolutely no sense.

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Too obscure maybe, but they used THE SCARECROW in the first movie.

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:19 (fourteen years ago) link

the bat man

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link

Too obscure maybe, but they used THE SCARECROW in the first movie.

yeah, and Ras Al-Ghul, who is also not at the top of the name-recognition pile

shake hands with Gongo? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:29 (fourteen years ago) link

I'd prefer Nolan invent a new villain. The rest of the comic's villains all seem to pale next to the Joker.

Also, Nolan hates Robin.

Simon H., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:35 (fourteen years ago) link

Thank god. I just don't see how Robin could work well in this universe.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:36 (fourteen years ago) link

There's the Dark Knight take, where Robin is a kid emulating Batman who gets taken in as a ward/trainee after saving his ass (but yeah DO NOT WANT Robin).

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:38 (fourteen years ago) link

a shuddering junkie who is taken in by bruce wayne

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:38 (fourteen years ago) link

Thats the thing though, Nolan has created this hugely insular, me against the world Batman and Bruce Wayne that I just can't see him taking anybody in.

you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:40 (fourteen years ago) link

the whole spidey 4 farrago shows that studios will interfere even with a winning team. wouldn't rule anything out.

free the charmless but occasionally brilliant Dom Passantino (history mayne), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:41 (fourteen years ago) link

Robin could work as a stalker who Batman never acknowledges or supports, maybe?

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:42 (fourteen years ago) link

Like the Michael Reagan of Gotham City.

ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:48 (fourteen years ago) link

WB isn't Fox though - they seem pretty content to leave Nolan and and his concepts be. (see also: the $200-million Inception)

Simon H., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 19:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Seems more-and-more likely to me that this franchise has hit the end of the road (in terms of ideas to explore and fresh, new reasons to continue). Joker v. Batman is always the highpoint of the series, to me, and downhill after that.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link

I don't know that telling a good Batman vs Joker stories automatically means there are no more worthwhile Batman stories to tell.

living like the Na'vi will never happen (HI DERE), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:02 (fourteen years ago) link

GIVE UP DAN ITS OVER.

Who Makes the Na'vis? (s1ocki), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link

Haha. Yes. I HAVE DECREED IT.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:05 (fourteen years ago) link

Trust me, I have no such delusions about my own significance or authority.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Really would like to see Miley Cyrus do a post-Ledger Harley Quinn.

da croupier, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:09 (fourteen years ago) link

Me too, if her character is violently beaten while she's singing.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:10 (fourteen years ago) link

just a friendly film-related reminder:

~~~~The Top 75 films/movies of the 2000s/oughties VOTING THREAD~~~~

A™ machine (sic) (omar little), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

The only thing overrated in that film is Ledger!!

― Radio Birdman Rally (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 13:01 (7 hours ago) Permalink

oh come on.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 20:26 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, there's many other overrated things in it besides him.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:19 (fourteen years ago) link

I hear it's too serious

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:24 (fourteen years ago) link

why

everybody's into weirdness right now (gbx), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:24 (fourteen years ago) link

Was that at my post? I wasn't serious

The reverse TARDIS of pasta (Niles Caulder), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 21:28 (fourteen years ago) link

four months pass...

#bieber4robin

da croupier, Thursday, 3 June 2010 14:21 (thirteen years ago) link

two months pass...

I finally saw this and really don't understand the plaudits for Ledger as the Joker. He obviously studied up on nature documentaries about the habits of lizards, OK, that's good - a lot of actors use animals as a starting point. But Jesus McGillicutty, it's like there's some unwritten iron law that villains must be a schizophrenic mixture of excitably comic and snarlingly vicious. cf Moriarty in the latest Sherlock series on the BBC. Ooh he's unpredictable! One minute he's laughing, the next minute he's shouting! Whatever will we do! Please, please please actors and directors of the world, can we please have a villain who is simply a genius at crime with an actual personality instead of a collection of psychopathic tics? THANK YOU IN ADVANCE I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 12:42 (thirteen years ago) link

to be fair tracer...he does call himself the joker and look like a clown, i think it's reasonable to assume he's not a dignified genius crime boss/moneyman, if he was it'd be Heat, not Batman.

I see what this is (Local Garda), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:00 (thirteen years ago) link

No that's fine, I just thought it was twitchy madman by the numbers. FIND DIFFERENT MANNERISMS PLEASE.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:11 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah, I was gonna say, you know, fair points but, uh, HE'S THE FUCKING JOKER.

http://www.lambiek.net/artists/a/aparo_jim/aparo_jim.jpg

Shock and Awe High School (Phil D.), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:12 (thirteen years ago) link

If that were Ledger's Joker whacking Robin with a crowbar he'd have to work in about thirty micro-scowls and five twitchy lip-licks in between each blow and after he was finished go "hmmmmmm!" like a school marm. Which is crazy, because school marms don't kill people! IT IS CRAZY!

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:23 (thirteen years ago) link

so you are criticizing Ledger for playing the Joker like the Joker...?

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:30 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah, the fact that his completely unpredictable has been a defining trait for The Joker since day one, can't really blame Ledger for running with that. The movie makers must like the weirdo Batman villains, most Batman movies have featured them instead of the more rational crime geniuses. The weirdos just tend to be more memorable, I guess - how many people remember Batman Begins for Liam Neeson's or Tom Wikinson's performances?

The bigger problem is that DK doesn't find a good angle to the Batman/Joker conflict. Traditionally, Batman has been depicted as a highly intelligent, rational superdetective who can predict any outcome - and that's why The Joker is such a good nemesis for him, as he's totally unpredictable. Another way of contrasting Batman and Joker is the idea (first presented in The Killing Joke) that they're not so different, that they're both mad in their own way, that they both had "one bad day" which changed them into what they are. But DK doesn't really try either of this approaches, The Joker isn't really contrasted with Batman, he pretty much stands alone and Batman is left in his shadow.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:30 (thirteen years ago) link

I mean you are basically talking about the character that is the modern archetype for "twitchy unpredictable madman"; this has been the most prominent example of it for the past 70 years, particularly in comics and cartoon series over the past... 25? You might as well complain that Batman broods too much or Superman is too moral and good-looking, or that the Riddler would be more successful if he didn't keep dropping hints about his crimes or the Penguin's avian theme doesn't make sense, etc etc.

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:36 (thirteen years ago) link

if anything i thought the ledger joker was one of the first to really get the schizo light-switch flip between tra-la-la wacky and totally-fucking-scary and back again *right*. (though much love to mark hamill as always.)

strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:43 (thirteen years ago) link

The weirdos just tend to be more memorable, I guess - how many people remember Batman Begins for Liam Neeson's or Tom Wikinson's performances?

not sure neeson's al-ghul doesn't count as 'weirdo', but leaving that aside it was a shit performance in a shittily written role. he looked embarrassed at most of his lines. at least the joker is cool

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:47 (thirteen years ago) link

the schizo light-switch flip between tra-la-la wacky and totally-fucking-scary and back again

Yeah it's this - I'm just fucking over it. I never really read comic books when I was little, but my impression of the Joker was that he was just a mean motherfucker who liked to make fun of people and create spectacular, nonsensical crimes, rather than being some sort of ADD neurotic.

I wouldn't have a problem if it were interesting, which is why my problem is with Ledger, not the Joker. He is just incredibly mannered and actorly, like Sean Penn in "Sweet and Lowdown". For the most part, trying to play a person who is that visibly crazy is just doomed to fail: as an actor, you are NOT actually crazy to that physical degree, so you are faking it. Which the audience comprehends on some level. In my opinion craziness needs to come out of the script, not in the outward mannerisms of the actor. I would have loved to see Ledger play the Joker "straight". I bet a lot of his lines would have sounded even crazier that way.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:47 (thirteen years ago) link

I never really read comic books when I was little, but my impression of the Joker was that he was just a mean motherfucker who liked to make fun of people and create spectacular, nonsensical crimes, rather than being some sort of ADD neurotic.

well, you were wrong

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:50 (thirteen years ago) link

also, Joker played straight = Two-Face

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:50 (thirteen years ago) link

kind of agree with tracer. always want the joker to be a supersmooth ganster sweet talking type, let the crazy manifest itself in the 'trying to kill everyone' macrodetail.

still enjoyed ledger's performance. best thing in this movie, that's for sure.

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:50 (thirteen years ago) link

After playing Arkham Asylum, I REALLY hope the figure out a way to use Victor Zsasz

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:54 (thirteen years ago) link

use him more, I mean

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:55 (thirteen years ago) link

Batman: [narrating] Now the guy's got the Joker as a partner. Any problems, he goes to the Joker. Trouble with the bill? He can go to the Joker. Trouble with Gordon, deliveries, the Riddler, he can call the Joker. But now the guy's gotta come up with the Joker's money every week, no matter what. Business bad? Fuck you, pay me. Oh, you had a fire? Fuck you, pay me. Place got hit by lightning, huh? Fuck you, pay me.

('_') (omar little), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:58 (thirteen years ago) link

THA JOKEFATHER

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 13:59 (thirteen years ago) link

JOKEFELLAS

Shock and Awe High School (Phil D.), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:04 (thirteen years ago) link

JOKINO

okay are we done now

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:04 (thirteen years ago) link

JOKESI DRIVER

Shock and Awe High School (Phil D.), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:05 (thirteen years ago) link

i.e. no we clearly are not

Shock and Awe High School (Phil D.), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:05 (thirteen years ago) link

JOKESY MALONE

ledge, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:06 (thirteen years ago) link

BLOWKER

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:06 (thirteen years ago) link

gagfather

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:06 (thirteen years ago) link

THE UNJOKEABLES

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:09 (thirteen years ago) link

suggest bans all around then.

strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:13 (thirteen years ago) link

angels with dirty jokes

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:14 (thirteen years ago) link

Also the Joker wasn't skinny enough. He needs to be wearing drainpipe trousers and an impossibly tight jacket. Wiry people are inherently untrustworthy. Beefy dudes are honest. When Ledger leaned out of the window of the cop car and shook his hair and salivated on his prosthetic muzzle a little I was struck by his brawny biceps. No way the Joker works out. No fucking way.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:14 (thirteen years ago) link

You don't want Dark Knight, you want Jim Aparo presents Batman

this isn't STRAWBERRY 0_o it's RAWBERRY (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:16 (thirteen years ago) link

he wants joseph gordon levitt (not a bad shout in 20 years time maybe)

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:17 (thirteen years ago) link

ha actually I would not be mad at all if they tapped him to do it if they wanted to keep the character, he was the most credible thing about "GI Joe"

yes, I saw "GI Joe", in the THEATER

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:19 (thirteen years ago) link

hai guys what sucks about The Dark Knight now?

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:20 (thirteen years ago) link

Tracer Hand prefers Nicholson

xxp HI DERE so did I...watch Levitt ecome Robin...

rotting-month story (Drugs A. Money), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:20 (thirteen years ago) link

omg haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:21 (thirteen years ago) link

the most incredible thing about gi joe was rachel nicholls in that catsuit

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:21 (thirteen years ago) link

I give Levitt 5 years max before he's ripped to the gills. It always happens. I never noticed before how he really is like a mini-Ledger.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:22 (thirteen years ago) link

played his younger brother to good effect in ten things i hate about teen movies and horse jawed leading ladies

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:23 (thirteen years ago) link

I give JGL five years before he marries me.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:23 (thirteen years ago) link

jgl was not heath ledgers younger brother in 10tihay

max, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:42 (thirteen years ago) link

should have been, then

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:45 (thirteen years ago) link

well, he wasnt

max, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:49 (thirteen years ago) link

my memories of a better film really bothering u huh

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:52 (thirteen years ago) link

no, its just... they werent brothers

max, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:53 (thirteen years ago) link

gonna tell everyone i meet today they were

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:54 (thirteen years ago) link

fucked up thing about 10 tens i hate about you was julia stiles' character was the ledger character's sister

('_') (omar little), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 14:59 (thirteen years ago) link

10 tens lol

('_') (omar little), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link

http://beerslugger.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/epps-300x152.jpg

l-r: Heath Ledger, Joseph Gordon-Levitt

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link

no, heath ledger didnt have any siblings in 10 things i hate about you

max, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:01 (thirteen years ago) link

yes, I saw "GI Joe", in the THEATER

oh Dan

(¬_¬) (Nicole), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:02 (thirteen years ago) link

It was better than "Terminator: Salvation" </ringingendorsement>

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:03 (thirteen years ago) link

Also the Joker wasn't skinny enough. He needs to be wearing drainpipe trousers and an impossibly tight jacket. Wiry people are inherently untrustworthy. Beefy dudes are honest. When Ledger leaned out of the window of the cop car and shook his hair and salivated on his prosthetic muzzle a little I was struck by his brawny biceps. No way the Joker works out. No fucking way.

This is basically the Riddler in Alan Moore's Killing Joke, right? In that incarnation he's a scrawny crippled gangster with a shock of red hair - and I think it works great.

village idiot (dog latin), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:15 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah I'm curious about why D4n thinks the Nolan/Ledger Joker is true to Joker-dom. I always thought the Joker was a big dandy. Permagrin, wild sharp suits. Ledger plays him as a bedraggled muttering tramp. I'd have thought the Joker would be too proud for that, too invested in his flashiness and showmanship.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:21 (thirteen years ago) link

he was more bedraggled than usual but the thing Ledger really went for that no one aside from Mark Hamill in the animated series had really done is play up the straight-up anarchy streak that informs the Joker's actions

Batman is an insane dude who is all about order, law and protecting the weak.

The Joker is an insane dude who is all about disorder, chaos and preying on others.

I thought the film went to great lengths to play up these extremes, including having Batman be the more tailored, pristine-appearing figure (as that fits his psyche profile) and the Joker looking more bedraggled and less put-together (as that fits his). And at any rate, you weren't criticizing his appearance, you were criticizing his craziness, which is the defining characteristic of the character and has been since his debut in 1940 but has especially been built up over the past 25 years.

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:28 (thirteen years ago) link

No that's right and yes, the contrasts couldn't have been clearer. (Although it might have been more interesting to have both Batman and the Joker be pristine dandies.)

But I wasn't criticizing his craziness at all Dan! I was criticizing that particular, shopworn craziness of the schizo light-switch flip between tra-la-la wacky and totally-fucking-scary and back again. There are so many other kinds of crazy. Like Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter. I'm not saying that would work for the Joker, but there's something infinitely creepier to me about an unflappable maniac. Like when the Wall Street Journal editorial page calmly articulates why it's in the national interest to convert all illegal immigrants into biofuels or whatever.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:43 (thirteen years ago) link

Or another kind of crazy: Pentecostal preachers who speak in tongues. That would actually be a great villain. The Preacher.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:44 (thirteen years ago) link

But yeah, I guess you're saying that the Ledger/Nolan brand of twitchy schizo lightswitch crazy is the way the Joker is in the comic books? I guess I just didn't like the result.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:46 (thirteen years ago) link

But I wasn't criticizing his craziness at all Dan! I was criticizing that particular, shopworn craziness of the schizo light-switch flip between tra-la-la wacky and totally-fucking-scary and back again.

...which, as I said earlier, has been the Joker's archetype for SEVENTY YEARS (61 if you are excluding the whimsical Silver Age iteration that is basically the TV show character)

I'm not just saying "that's how he was in the comics"; I'm saying "it is very very likely that this character is responsible for making that type of crazy so prevalent in modern storytelling". I can't prove he's the progenitor and I assume similar characters predate him, but in terms of modern storytelling and where people draw character inspiration from, you likely can draw the inspiration for an absurd number (like, maybe 90%) to the Joker.

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:50 (thirteen years ago) link

it's also important to note that the joker was a scary-ass "light-switch" psycho from the very beginning of the comics in the '40s. he only really developed into the pastel-wearing wacky-go-lucky prankster because shit had to be softened during the '50s and '60s. he started to get hardcore again as '70s comics became more permissive, and then everything kinda went to hell (from tracer's pov anyway) in the '80s with the dark knight returns/death in the family/killing joke trifecta.

strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:52 (thirteen years ago) link

haha xpost

strongohulkingtonsghost, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:52 (thirteen years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joker_%28comics%29

I mean, just read through this. Dude has been like this for decades.

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:53 (thirteen years ago) link

I just wanna say GI Joe would have been awesome awesome awesome if it wasn't for Marlon Wayans and Joseph Gordon Levitt being too chicken to use the actual Cobra Commander voice

da croupier, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 15:59 (thirteen years ago) link

you will never be the new heath ledger with that kind of cowardice, JGL

da croupier, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:00 (thirteen years ago) link

Haha Jesus. Bury em in paperwork. I suspect you're right that the Joker himself is, in a tautological kind of way, responsible for the ubiquity of the exact twitchy psychopath-by-numbers performance that chafed my vagina so much in Dark Knight. How Jokerish of him.

One thing I really did like was how the Joker kept commandeering everyone's televisions, like in the TV show. That was awesome. "This... is the Joker!" "Whaaa?!"

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:04 (thirteen years ago) link

i really need to watch more twitchy psychopath-by-numbers movies

da croupier, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:06 (thirteen years ago) link

if anything I feel I've seen too much cool, collected Hannibal Lecter/Jigsaw shit of late

da croupier, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:07 (thirteen years ago) link

ha the first thing that popped to mind when reading the phrase "twitchy psychopath-by-numbers" was "Muriel's Wedding"

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:07 (thirteen years ago) link

a body count is exactly what that movie needed

da croupier, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:08 (thirteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9OQsAWE3Eg

('_') (omar little), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:09 (thirteen years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unw5gZj5OS8

da croupier, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:12 (thirteen years ago) link

Or another kind of crazy: Pentecostal preachers who speak in tongues. That would actually be a great villain. The Preacher.

see, e.g., robert deniro, cape fear.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 31 August 2010 17:00 (thirteen years ago) link

ha that reminds me that I meant to mention this earlier:

http://library.buffalo.edu/libraries/asl/guides/graphicnovels/img/preacher1.jpg

(not a villain, though)

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 17:04 (thirteen years ago) link

Can the Joker kill Garth Ennis?

(¬_¬) (Nicole), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 17:06 (thirteen years ago) link

im with croups. so few movies go far genuinely showy bad guy performances any more. it's all freakin timothy olyphant (who i generally like) frowning his way thru die hard 4

real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 17:46 (thirteen years ago) link

like im straining ot think of anything vaguely recent with a big bad guy who is actually kinda big and wacky and not just a 4th-generation creepy hannibal lecter knockoff (you'd really prefer another variation on THAT cliche tracer??)

ledger was awesome, so fun to watch, so unpredictable

real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 17:47 (thirteen years ago) link

yes

('_') (omar little), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 17:57 (thirteen years ago) link

timothy olyphant and his sidekicks were a steep drop from alan rickman and his posse of awesome eurotrash (all of whom kind of memorable even if they were only onscreen for a couple minutes apiece.)

('_') (omar little), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:00 (thirteen years ago) link

ledger was awesome, so fun to watch, so unpredictable

― real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 17:47 (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i double-take every time this happens

ledge, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:06 (thirteen years ago) link

every time... what... happens?

real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:22 (thirteen years ago) link

someone brings up Ledger, which I am assuming based on username is his name

Squirrel! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:24 (thirteen years ago) link

ledger was awesome, so fun to watch, so unpredictable

I've got nothing against showiness, FWIW, but I did think it was incredibly predictable.

Not sure what you mean about Hannibal Lecter rip-offs. IIRC Hopkins was basically just a kind of oleaginous, exaggeratedly polite dude with a weakness for human flesh.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:40 (thirteen years ago) link

I think what bothered me about Ledger was that it's like OK, yes, good job acting "maniacal" but what's at stake? What does he want? Why does it matter if he gets it? I don't want the answers from the script, I want them from the give-and-take in a scene. Ledger/Nolan's Joker was in his own little world the whole time. Maybe you'll say yes, that's who the Joker is, he's in his own little world. Well, OK, but that leads to some pretty static, one-note perfs.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:47 (thirteen years ago) link

i don't know. i'm not sure i care very much about his motives, in the context of superhero movies (in other kinds of movies, i care a lot). in part it's because i'm not much of a fan of superhero films, but -- in particular -- i've been really bored by the "origin stories." it's one of the reasons that, in this genre of films, the second movie is often better than the first (it isn't bogged-down in the characters' origins and/or motivations).

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:50 (thirteen years ago) link

Dramateacher Hand

goole, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 18:51 (thirteen years ago) link

it becomes clear over the film that the joker just wants everything to burn - that he just gets off on the chaos and perversion of it all

i mean, it's so clear that it's even in the dialogue

real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 19:04 (thirteen years ago) link

i mean the whole point was to play off the "who is he REALLY" thing and show it up as being kind of useless - i thought that was cool

real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 19:05 (thirteen years ago) link

Not sure what you mean about Hannibal Lecter rip-offs. IIRC Hopkins was basically just a kind of oleaginous, exaggeratedly polite dude with a weakness for human flesh.

― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:40 PM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark

see some more bad serial killer movies. they're all freakin' polite and mannered now

or at least were for 10+ years after silence o the lambs

real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 19:06 (thirteen years ago) link

I think what bothered me about Ledger was that it's like OK, yes, good job acting "maniacal" but what's at stake? What does he want?

as s1 says, that's just the point. he doesn't give a shit at all. for him, nothing is at stake. you can make the case that that's not necessarily good drama, but it's not because of the performance.

caek, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 19:09 (thirteen years ago) link

hoping next movie is batman v. angry human centipede.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 31 August 2010 19:09 (thirteen years ago) link

would allow them to acknowledge a lot of minor entries in the rogue's gallery, something i wish more superhero films would do in a montage or something

Argh, no. Dick Tracy did this and it was a terrible misuse of characters.

tricked by a toothless cobra, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 21:08 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah I don't know why Heath Ledger didn't consult me before taking on this role. LEARN FROM THE BEST, DUDE.

Anyway this is distracting from the real tragedy of Dark Knight, which is that Gary Oldman's mustache was scandalously unmentioned in the credits.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 21:43 (thirteen years ago) link

Ledger's performance is natural, haunted, tragic. I don't really care for the movie that much when he's not on screen, but it's easily one of my 10 favorite performances ever. Reminds me of Brando in Last Tango in Paris.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:00 (thirteen years ago) link

ok, to be more precise, I barely tolerate the movie when he's not on screen.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:01 (thirteen years ago) link

you hiss and swear at the screen and stamp your feet

real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:22 (thirteen years ago) link

more like reload ilx

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:23 (thirteen years ago) link

matt otm. the performance is amazing: vibrant, funny, endlessly surprising. by far the best thing about either of nolan's batman movies, maybe the only good thing. totally mystified by tracer's objections.

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:45 (thirteen years ago) link

Ledger's performance is natural, haunted, tragic. I don't really care for the movie that much when he's not on screen, but it's easily one of my 10 favorite performances ever. Reminds me of Brando in Last Tango in Paris.

wow

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:47 (thirteen years ago) link

Well I've tried to explain it from about 8 million angles but at this point I'm just being annoying so I'm not going to try again. Actually probably well before this point. This movie sucked btw.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:53 (thirteen years ago) link

*overturns table and storms out*

real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:55 (thirteen years ago) link

HAND OUT

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:56 (thirteen years ago) link

Let me know if they need to come to my office for discipline.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 22:56 (thirteen years ago) link

agreed with this pretty much

Nolan's filmography can perhaps be summed up by the iconic shot of the Joker in The Dark Knight, sticking his head out the police car window, oblivious to the dangers around him—an image of freed chaos. It's a small, lyrical moment, and it feels like it happened by accident. The shot is surrounded by so much plot detritus that it feels like a scream from a smarter, better film.

caek, Tuesday, 31 August 2010 23:15 (thirteen years ago) link

i think the movie is dope

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 23:46 (thirteen years ago) link

a lil heavy handed but yeah -- forget joker, the opening scene is one of the best opening scenes in an action movie everrr

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 23:46 (thirteen years ago) link

My least favorite major hit of the last five years. I put it on my Netflix queue to see if I still hate it.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 August 2010 23:57 (thirteen years ago) link

a lil heavy handed but yeah -- forget joker, the opening scene is one of the best opening scenes in an action movie everrr

Too bad about the rest of the movie.

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 00:15 (thirteen years ago) link

probably my most favorite major hit of the past 5 years

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 02:56 (thirteen years ago) link

you should put it on your netflix queue to see if you still love it

real s1ock (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 02:57 (thirteen years ago) link

I finally did: I was right.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:03 (thirteen years ago) link

well we haven't heard from deej yet

real s1ock (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:05 (thirteen years ago) link

Come Anticipate Rewatching The Dark Knight.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:06 (thirteen years ago) link

I will always have love for this because of the nice shots of Chicago and because I took my dad to the IMAX rerelease and he geeked hilariously hard over it, but that ending monologue never made any serious sense to me until someone on Tumblr captioned a picture of Kanye with it in the wake of the Taylor Swift fiasco

A B C, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:13 (thirteen years ago) link

you should put it on your netflix queue to see if you still love it

― real s1ock (s1ocki), Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:57 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i own it but ill put it in my netflix queue anyway

NOT FUNNY NEEDS MORE GUCCI (deej), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:32 (thirteen years ago) link

for balance

real s1ock (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 03:35 (thirteen years ago) link

Come Anticipate Rescreening The Dark Knight.

Chaki doesn't have beef with unicorn (stevie), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 08:42 (thirteen years ago) link

So I've had it up to here waiting for a new Batman film to come out.

village idiot (dog latin), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 09:21 (thirteen years ago) link

I don't think you actually have.

Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 11:00 (thirteen years ago) link

haha

real s1ock (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 12:54 (thirteen years ago) link

I agree w Matt about Ledger being the only reason I will watch this movie.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 13:21 (thirteen years ago) link

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

well, that and THE BATMAN VOICE.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 1 September 2010 13:23 (thirteen years ago) link

other reasons-

michael caine
morgan freeman
looks great
fighting/action scenes & setpieces all great

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 13:25 (thirteen years ago) link

love catching bits of this movie on HBO, as far as heavy-handed blockbusters go, there's a lot of bells and whistles and actors I like.

xpost!

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 13:28 (thirteen years ago) link

do people think "I like michael caine/morgan freeman"?

conrad, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 13:32 (thirteen years ago) link

what a very strange question

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 13:34 (thirteen years ago) link

That scene w/Morgan Freeman and the dude who has figured out that Bruce Wayne is or is funding Batman is A+

Shock and Awe High School (Phil D.), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 13:59 (thirteen years ago) link

i can't remember if it worked better the first time i saw it or not, but i think the movie would be pretty great if Nolan was capable of really injected an element of chaos (and fear of that chaos) into the movie. prob the best non-ledger scene in the movie is just before the big action set piece in the middle, with the police convoy setting out and you're wondering just what in the hell is about to happen...

ryan, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:02 (thirteen years ago) link

i think the first one is a more enjoyable watch tbh

goole, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:04 (thirteen years ago) link

ilx hates all cinema, it's a conspiracy to send us back to the flipbook era

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:07 (thirteen years ago) link

nah that's just morbs pining for what he grew up with

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:08 (thirteen years ago) link

because he's old

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:08 (thirteen years ago) link

(<3 morbs)

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:08 (thirteen years ago) link

Morbs =

http://images.hollywood.com/site/man_from_earth_poster.jpg

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:12 (thirteen years ago) link

This movie is great

BUT

I did like The Prestige more than either Batman movies.

rotting-month story (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:13 (thirteen years ago) link

prestige love always kind of astounds me.

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:14 (thirteen years ago) link

because no morgan freeman in it right

conrad, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:25 (thirteen years ago) link

The Prestige was awesome!

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:25 (thirteen years ago) link

i saw the twist coming p early and i think maybe didn't enjoy as much as i should have? might re'screen'

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:28 (thirteen years ago) link

bowie makes up for no freeman, obvs

k¸ (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:28 (thirteen years ago) link

which "twist" iirc there are like 3

max, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:31 (thirteen years ago) link

also prestige was raaadd

max, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:32 (thirteen years ago) link

one of my fave flicks of the 2000s

max, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:32 (thirteen years ago) link

I think it's kind of a toss-up as to whether "The Prestige" or "Memento" is better, but yeah "The Prestige" is fucking great.

feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:33 (thirteen years ago) link

Memento didn't take it far enough. not only should movies be shot in reverse order, they should be shot with scenes from other movies spliced in

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:37 (thirteen years ago) link

I might have liked The Dark Knight had Bowie played the Maggie Gyllenhaal character.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:40 (thirteen years ago) link

David or Sam?

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:41 (thirteen years ago) link

Angela.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 16:51 (thirteen years ago) link

http://www.legendsofamerica.com/photos-oldwest/JamesBowie.jpg

When I told you that if Gotham no longer needed Batman we could be together, I meant it. But I'm not sure the day will come when you will no longer need Batman. I hope it does and if it does I will be there, but only as your *friend.* I'm sorry to let you down. If you lose your faith in me, please keep your faith in people. Love, now and always, - Rachel.

('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:16 (thirteen years ago) link

ahahahaa

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:18 (thirteen years ago) link

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_62MBVz5zYo4/TCMFT6ih46I/AAAAAAAABWE/loYR49gOl8U/s1600/sam_bowie3.jpg

Bruce, don't make me your only chance fr a normal life :(

funky brewster (San Te), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:20 (thirteen years ago) link

prob the best non-ledger scene in the movie is just before the big action set piece in the middle, with the police convoy setting out and you're wondering just what in the hell is about to happen...

kind of agree, and did like the chase scene as a whole, but that was the point at which i began to disengage from the film. and i'd managed to fool myself into thinking that it must be nearly over, so i spent the next hour+ in increasing frustration that it was still fucking going. i mean, i love ledger, freeman and caine in it, but really did not enjoy this film.

then again, i haven't liked anything nolan's done since memento, so i guess i'm doomed to hate.

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:35 (thirteen years ago) link

I agree that The Prestige was better than both Batmans. Even if it kinda relied on the twists, they weren't there just for pure mindscrew value, they actually added depth to both main characters. Inception was probably more impressive and than The Prestige, but at times it felt like Nolan was too much in love with its cleverness, the plot was kinda needlessly complex. The Prestige was more streamlined, basically just a ripping yarn with good characters, with no particular message or anything. But the best bits in Inception were still better than anything else Nolan has ever done, hard to say which of the two is better.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 22:22 (thirteen years ago) link

Rewatched Begins last night for first time--it really is a bit of a mess. Kind of surprised, actually, that it did well enough to spawn a (much, much better) sequel. Ra's as villain? Tedious and silly first hour? Stupid supervillain microwave panic gas plot? What IS this shit? It's as though they did their 'Batman & Robin' before their 'Batman Returns', rather than after.

And they all sing Christian Science songs. you know, the good o (James Morrison), Thursday, 2 September 2010 00:32 (thirteen years ago) link

ehhh....Batman is a kind of ludicrous premise to begin with...I imagine all the Year One stuff is at least a little necessary if you want to even begin to take it seriously.

I haven't seen Inception yet. I heard it was loosely based off another Christopher Priest novel--A Dream of Wessex--which I've wanted to read for a long time. I imagine I'll read it before I go see it (and yes that means that I will miss the experience of seeing it in the theater, but my policy dovetails nicely with my poverty...)

rotting-month story (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 2 September 2010 01:24 (thirteen years ago) link

"michael caine"

all he does is the tangerine thing really

"morgan freeman"

Useless character, rote performance

"looks great"

yeah I guess

"fighting/action scenes & setpieces all great'

Except for the China one which is fast forward city for me.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 2 September 2010 01:52 (thirteen years ago) link

I really loved the effect of the helicopter crashing into the building.

Next movie: more shit blowing up, less batman dealing with moral dilemmas, plz.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 2 September 2010 01:54 (thirteen years ago) link

less batman, period, plz.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 2 September 2010 01:54 (thirteen years ago) link

just blow shit up, call the movie batman 3.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 2 September 2010 01:55 (thirteen years ago) link

I really am gonna be mad if they go with the batman growly voice again.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 2 September 2010 01:56 (thirteen years ago) link

Except for the China one which is fast forward city for me.

― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, September 1, 2010 8:52 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is awesome wtf

the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 03:01 (thirteen years ago) link

batman is **about** moral dilemmas

the embrace of waka flocka is v pertinent (deej), Thursday, 2 September 2010 03:02 (thirteen years ago) link

that's true, and it's potentially an interesting angle. but this version of the franchise doesn't seem to be able to do anything interesting with that idea.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 2 September 2010 03:09 (thirteen years ago) link

don't get me wrong, i liked the last batman movie. but ledger's joker was the only good thing about it.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 2 September 2010 03:09 (thirteen years ago) link

so then how could you like it if Ledger was the only good thing in it?

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 2 September 2010 03:21 (thirteen years ago) link

so then how could you like it if Ledger was the only good thing in it?

― Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, September 2, 2010 3:21 AM (47 seconds ago) Bookmark

Cuz he's in a lot of it?

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 2 September 2010 03:22 (thirteen years ago) link

http://media.bigoo.ws/content/gif/music/music_139.gif

real s1ock (s1ocki), Thursday, 2 September 2010 05:35 (thirteen years ago) link

i don't know why i don't like the prestige, but i don't. i like the novel, but only kinda. i mean, of christopher priest i've only read that and inverted world, and i like christopher priest, but it's not my favorite book or anything. and it succeeds by virtue of its ideas more than its storytelling. in the movie, the ideas get refined (streamlined and improved, frankly), but the characters become even more two-dimensional, and for some reason it just doesn't work. i loved thinking about the movie after the fact, but watching it did nothing for me. and (can i say this?) i fucking loathe christian bale in this visceral way that is 100% unfair, i'm sure, but is nonetheless unavoidable. i just do not like looking at or listening to him.

have yes to see inception. in spite of everything, i'm looking forward to it...

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:23 (thirteen years ago) link

never mind 'in spite of everything' it's awesome.

k¸ (darraghmac), Thursday, 2 September 2010 09:22 (thirteen years ago) link

i don't know why i don't like the prestige, but i don't.

i fucking loathe christian bale in this visceral way that is 100% unfair

also I mean this in nicest way possible but gtfo.

rotting-month story (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:55 (thirteen years ago) link

don't get me wrong, i liked the last batman movie. but ledger's joker was the only good thing about it.

― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, September 1, 2010 11:09 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I dunno I really kinda liked Eckhart as Harvey Dent before he turns into Two-Face. I thought he made him a very dynamic character and it was cool that the first two-thirds of the movie was a sort of Joker/Dent binary with Batman being a sort of combination Dent henchman/looney third-wheel (that voice!)

rotting-month story (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:58 (thirteen years ago) link

I still have a soft spot for Bale because of Empire of the Sun, despite increasingly weird behaviour and acting.

rhythm fixated member (chap), Thursday, 2 September 2010 14:59 (thirteen years ago) link

many xposts but er if 'inception' is based on 'a dream of wessex' it is veeeeeerrrrrrrry loosely based

thomp, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link

i mean, total recall is about as close to that book as inception is

thomp, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link

'based' is not the right work--'a possible source for' might be a little better...still gonna read it before seeing the movie.

rotting-month story (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:05 (thirteen years ago) link

the connection is pretty much just DUDE WHAT IF WE COULD PLUG OURSELVES INTO STUFF AND SHARE DREAMS DUDE. n.b. not a spoiler

thomp, Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:12 (thirteen years ago) link

HOW DARE YOU SPOIL DARK KNIGHT BY TELLING ME BATMAN WAS IN IT

funky brewster (San Te), Thursday, 2 September 2010 15:16 (thirteen years ago) link

whatev: Dream of Wessex then Inception.

rotting-month story (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 2 September 2010 17:50 (thirteen years ago) link

also I mean this in nicest way possible but gtfo.

― rotting-month story (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, September 2, 2010 7:55 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark

yeah okay, point taken. but i loved him in empire of the sun, and liked him in american psycho. even though i think he's horrible, horrible can work in the right role. i.e., "i just do not like looking at or listening to him," was overstated cuz unpleasantness is sometimes a cool character trait. eric roberts did some great work in the 80s while seeming at all times like a complete asshole, and i've liked ray liotta in certain roles, despite the fact that he creeps me the fuck out.

...trying to defend the idea that there's something more to my disappointment in the prestige than a visceral loathing of the bale. not sure i'm pulling it off though.

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:31 (thirteen years ago) link

I wish we'd seen more of Bruce Wayne's pecs and poon-chasing side.

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:35 (thirteen years ago) link

but it's not on the comic book, yeah, whatever, blah

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:35 (thirteen years ago) link

*in

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:35 (thirteen years ago) link

i wish there'd been some "Secretary" type scenes w/ Maggie

funky brewster (San Te), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:54 (thirteen years ago) link

yumz

Gucci Mane hermeneuticist (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:54 (thirteen years ago) link

ok so gyllenhall & holmes look alike because they're playing the same character, but how far back does this female lead resemblance go?
who was the lead in that movie before memento?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 2 September 2010 22:58 (thirteen years ago) link

six months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8UiJmCN_K4&feature=player_embedded

Duane Barry, Friday, 18 March 2011 00:29 (thirteen years ago) link

five months pass...

Jim Emerson takes down the chase sequence in this video.

Gukbe, Friday, 9 September 2011 17:57 (twelve years ago) link

I found this sequence utterly baffling the first time I saw it, and every subsequent time. At last, I now know exactly why.

... You're an idiot?

Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:03 (twelve years ago) link

I mean, it's not like this is a Transformers movie with two vaguely humanoid gunmetal grey robots wrapped around each other so tightly you can't tell where one ends and the other begins, or which one is the good guy and which one is the bad guy.

Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:04 (twelve years ago) link

I wasn't quite as harsh but...yeah.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 9 September 2011 18:05 (twelve years ago) link

I think he took down himself, not any chase scenes.

mh, Friday, 9 September 2011 18:17 (twelve years ago) link

I thought that Christopher Nolan was a pretty poor director of action sequences was commonly accepted.

Gus Van Sant's Gerry Blank (Eric H.), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:21 (twelve years ago) link

Funny that he does a shot-by-shot breakdown of what doesn't work in the sequence and he's still called an idiot.

Gukbe, Friday, 9 September 2011 18:22 (twelve years ago) link

action sequences /= chase sequences

he's not so good with the hand to hand combat stuff imho. but he is VERY good with the car chase-y stuff.

you will always be wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:22 (twelve years ago) link

two vaguely humanoid gunmetal grey robots wrapped around each other so tightly you can't tell where one ends and the other begins

seriously bummed that i can't find gr8080's transformers porn thread to link to here

assume makes an ass out of u and me (but mainly u) (stevie), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:28 (twelve years ago) link

I agree with Shakes. Interesting thing I found out recently about Nolan is that he shoots his own second unit stuff. or I guess more accurately, his movies are entirely first unit. could probably use that as evidence that he's either doing something massively right, or massively wrong.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i_qxQztHRI (Princess TamTam), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:31 (twelve years ago) link

Funny that he does a shot-by-shot breakdown of what doesn't work in the sequence and he's still called an idiot.

In fairness, the video is blocked by my work so I can't watch it

However, I didn't think there was anything the least bit baffling or confusing about that chase sequence so I don't really expect to be enlightened as to all the ways it was confusing or didn't since, for me, it did.

Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:32 (twelve years ago) link

I don't think it's a question of whether the sequence works for you or not, but there are significant issues if you're looking for them. Or more accurately, if something about it didn't work for you, the video might be a good explanation of why. The SWAT van has always bothered me, and I was never sure why. Even if you don't care about where Dent is sitting in the police van or where the cop cars are positioned, that fall into the river really makes no sense at all.

Gukbe, Friday, 9 September 2011 18:37 (twelve years ago) link

there are significant issues if you're looking for them

this seems like a critical statement to consider

I mean, we're not really talking about Rob Liefeld and his tenuous grasp of human physiology here, we're talking about minor continuity gaffes that happen in every single movie ever made.

Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:44 (twelve years ago) link

Shut up man Jango Fett was just clumsy

Ned Raggett, Friday, 9 September 2011 18:49 (twelve years ago) link

i don't know much about comics but damn ppl must really hate this rob liefeld guy, his name comes up all the time, always negative context

the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:50 (twelve years ago) link

he is the worst

you will always be wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:51 (twelve years ago) link

The SWAT van is a pretty major continuity gaffe, but I take your point. He mentions in the essay that this isn't about a car being put back together for a few frames after it's been exploded, or a headlight is out in shot and on the next, it's a cumulative effect of shot composition and editing being spatially confusing. Ronin's chase sequences are rightly lauded because Frankenheimer got all those little things right, and when they get put together they add up to a very satisfying, sensible chase scene when your'e watching it, even if you're not aware of exactly why.

There's a good bit in the video where he talks about the scene in the script where the Batmobile charges down the lane and runs underneath the garbage truck, and he talks about how the shots as filmed could have made sense and fit in but they added some confusing inserts (the Joker looking forward as though the Batmobile was in his lane, a shot of the cop driver swerving, etc).

Gukbe, Friday, 9 September 2011 18:52 (twelve years ago) link

the Joker looking forward as though the Batmobile was in his lane

rmde

you will always be wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:55 (twelve years ago) link

re: Liefeld, I can't verify that this link works because my job blocks it, but: http://progressiveboink.com/archive/robliefeld.html

more to the point, here is his infamous Captain America and a rendition of the necessary anatomy for the pic to make any goddamn sense:

http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_li1bbyY9AC1qgl2lfo1_400.jpg

Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Friday, 9 September 2011 18:59 (twelve years ago) link

sigh xpost

Gukbe, Friday, 9 September 2011 18:59 (twelve years ago) link

Okay, I watched the video. It's actually pretty good and gives you a lot to chew on - anyone who hates how little clarity is prized in today's action movies should get something out of it. He walks you through some of the technical aspects that are treated differently in an action scene versus say a dialogue scene, aspects of blocking and composition like the 180 rule. I think he makes a mistake in not attempting to understand why Nolan was crossing the line wrt stuff like the truck t-boning the SWAT van - the disorienting effect there is clearly intentional! And some of the nitpicks don't hold up, like 4 minutes in he clamors for an interior two-shot to establish the geography of the scene, but the reverse shot has already established that the SWAT guy is sitting across from Harvey, and the movie never contradicts that by revealing that he's sitting next to him or anything like that. He's right that the way the truck recovers is clearly impossible, but I can chalk that up to movie magic. And some of the information that the scene fails to convey with visual storytelling is still present for the audience via context. The scene still works.

But this is all technical stuff - the truck chase works because he understands that the things that make for a good action scene are the same things that make for any other kind of good scene - the audience understanding and caring about what's happening, what's at stake, why characters are doing what they're doing, and the scene serving some narrative purpose in moving things from the scene before it to the scene after it. This is why crystal clear visual storytelling should be an action filmmaker's best friend - it's just a physical dramatization of the movie's conflicts! If you had some epic verbal confrontation in a script you were shooting, you wouldn't have the actors mumble the whole thing and then blare techno music over it to make it even more confusing, would you? OK, some directors would. But it'd be a bad idea if what you want is for the audience to care about what's happening.

Wrt Nolan I'm not sure what to think. I'll take it in good faith that in certain instances he's breaking rules he's familiar with to achieve a certain effect. But I do sorta wonder if shooting his own action means he stretches himself too thin, because in Inception there's a lot of papering over of geographical incoherence with nonsense cutting. Avid is seriously the worst thing to ever happen to action movies. I really think most directors are just lazy and this new school of action directing - handheld, tight close-ups, constant cutting - is a way for them to dispense with putting effort into staging interesting scenes. Great scenes have been done in this style, but it takes effort to set yourself apart.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i_qxQztHRI (Princess TamTam), Friday, 9 September 2011 21:04 (twelve years ago) link

i really love this pinefox post btw:

- I just really liked Batman! with his great virtue, realiability, proficiency, infinite skill, Batmobile, motorbike, incorrigibility - he was terrific to watch! and every time he shows up in a scene (including suddenly the one where Jokes is interrogated), it's really exciting!

― the pinefox, Monday, July 21, 2008 8:23 PM (3 years ago) Bookmark

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i_qxQztHRI (Princess TamTam), Friday, 9 September 2011 21:26 (twelve years ago) link

tamtam otm as usual

occam's hellraiser (latebloomer), Saturday, 10 September 2011 05:40 (twelve years ago) link

Joseph Kahn (Torque - yeah, I know...) offers a rebuttal.

Simon H., Friday, 16 September 2011 17:19 (twelve years ago) link

So that and the original piece cancel each other out and the rest of us can just enjoy shit crashing into each other as it stands, yes?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 16 September 2011 17:25 (twelve years ago) link

no you're enjoying it wrong

I saw Mike Love walk by a computer once (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 September 2011 17:34 (twelve years ago) link

lol Ned OTM

also that second piece seems to be a long, drawn out riff on my "You're an idiot?" question

sick yr finger up his butt (DJP), Friday, 16 September 2011 17:35 (twelve years ago) link

five months pass...

on TNT right now

Mordy, Sunday, 4 March 2012 02:05 (twelve years ago) link

five months pass...

just watched heathers and j.d. kinda reminded me of ledger as the joker

jack chick-fil-A (dayo), Friday, 24 August 2012 22:21 (eleven years ago) link

Love the South Park parody of this with Butters threatening to blow up a hospital, in his own way.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 25 August 2012 08:43 (eleven years ago) link

one year passes...

AMH is hella corny in this movie

Beatrix Kiddo (Raymond Cummings), Sunday, 15 December 2013 16:36 (ten years ago) link

A lot about this movie is very corny once the initial dazzle has subsided. Same goes for all Nolan's movies really.

I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Sunday, 15 December 2013 19:14 (ten years ago) link

one year passes...

https://youtu.be/VKpQgEyjNdM

schwantz, Friday, 31 July 2015 20:23 (eight years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKpQgEyjNdM

schwantz, Friday, 31 July 2015 20:24 (eight years ago) link

LOL amazing

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 31 July 2015 22:48 (eight years ago) link

Hahaha

Johnny Fever, Saturday, 1 August 2015 09:27 (eight years ago) link

That's the funniest sketch I've seen in a long time.

Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 1 August 2015 17:16 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.