I'm 27 now, and I just bought another pair of baggy jeans... When should you start dressing like an adult?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I don't really feel like a grown-up, so I don't want to start wearing my shirt tucked inside my pants, and I really like baggy clothes, but then again I wouldn't want to appear as some sad sack who can't let go of his youth either... Has anyone else gone through a late-twenties clothing crisis?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 29 July 2006 13:51 (nineteen years ago)

Not I.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 29 July 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)

I'm your age, and dressing like a tramp doesn't bother me in the least. If I put on posh clothes I just look awkward anyway, I think I'm destined for a life of sartorial inelegance. Nothing wrong with that.

chap who would dare to start Raaatpackin (chap), Saturday, 29 July 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

Has anyone else gone through a late-twenties clothing crisis?

Yes, about 17 years ago.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

I went from very fat, to not very fat, so in my late 20s I avoid all things baggy if possible.

Except today, it's fucking hot.

Jeff. (Jeff), Saturday, 29 July 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

Tuomas, this is not the best place to ask is it? FWIW i tend to think you look ok in the WDYLL pics you post & better than most male ilxors.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 14:15 (nineteen years ago)

This isn't about how I look (I think my clothes fit me perfectly well, in general), rather than when, if ever, should you start to conform to the expectations on how "a person of your age" should look like. I've already bought my first collared shirt last year...

Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 29 July 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

ok then, most men dress badly and the reason they look bad is because they dress like children. so yes, people should dress their age more.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

My clothing crises are all beergut-related.

Whitman Mayonnaise (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 29 July 2006 14:33 (nineteen years ago)

An awareness of this issue has managed to stop be buying ANY new clothes in the last year (and I turned 30 in December). Can't bring myself to buy more youngish stuff, but haven't found any oldish stuff that feels right.

JimD (JimD), Saturday, 29 July 2006 15:31 (nineteen years ago)

The Van Heusen outlet store has a bunch of washable 100% silk shirts for cheap -- got several, and now I get the feeling that I dress like an old Italian man.

Whitman Mayonnaise (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 29 July 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

I think age is a much less useful category than 'does this look good on?'. I would rather see youthful, well fitting clothing on everyone than another khaki shorts t-shirt athletic sandals baseball cap combo on a so-called adult.

Dolores Haze (Arachne), Saturday, 29 July 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)

the reason they look bad is because they dress like children is interesting

it often seems, to me, that some men barely think about what they are wearing

are you talking (in part?) about t-shirts/football shirts/sportswear, as day-to-day clothing, on people over a certain age?

I try not to think about what I "should" wear. I think I would dress more badly and feel more awkward, if I did

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)

and rather agree w/ Dolores Haze, in theory

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:01 (nineteen years ago)

there is no reason for baggy clothes

-- (688), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)

agree w/ that too, really

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)

Eat yer heart out, Ziggy Sobatka!

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)

PS, I'm 37.

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:25 (nineteen years ago)

do what you want and fuck the hatas

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

I'm 38, and the only shirt I own that isn't a band shirt is my "BSD OR DEATH"
t-shirt.

shieldforyoureyes (shieldforyoureyes), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

there is no reason for band tshirts

-- (688), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

there is no reason for clothing

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

when it's this hot out amirite

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)

there is a reason for argyle socks

-- (688), Saturday, 29 July 2006 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

so we can more quickly identify the walking dead

i'll mitya halfway (mitya), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:14 (nineteen years ago)

do what you want and fuck the hatas

OTM

teh_kit is jayne without the tits (g-kit), Saturday, 29 July 2006 17:22 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/onion_news329.article.jpg

dar1a g (daria g), Saturday, 29 July 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

I would like to dress like the Gunn guy from Project Runway. But I'm poor and it's hot, so I wear t-shirts and jeans and a Red Sox cap.

milo z (mlp), Saturday, 29 July 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

I feel like men in the Midwest either dress like children or adults -- and I mean "adult" in the pleated-khakis, plaid shirted way, like middle-class dads. It's like they're the analog of Medieval Europe in not having an in-between-aged culture. Gross.

Of course there's a huge population of 20/30-somethings, you'd just never know it from the way they dress.

Laurel (Laurel), Saturday, 29 July 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

ED: "Ever wonder why people wear clothes?"
RUBIN: "Nope."
ED: "But...well, look at it this way. Man's best friend is his apparel. Now, you start to dress for success, and you will score with the babes, and make the big bucks. You gotta admit that's true!
RUBIN: "I don't have to admit that."
ED: "You have to admit that!"
RUBIN: "No, I don't!"
ED: "Yes, you do!"
RUBIN: "I don't have to admit anything!"
ED: "You have to admit there's hair on your head!"
RUBIN: "No, I don't!"
ED: "Yes, you do! You have to admit that!"
RUBIN: "No, I don't!"
ED: "But you have to admit your cat's dead! He's deader than a doornail! That cat is colder than a well digger's ass! Pretty hard to deny that isn't it, Mr. Smartypants? Yep. Deceased. El morto. No more Mr. Kittycat."

Marmot 4-Tay: I'll sip from his well without hesitation. (marmotwolof), Saturday, 29 July 2006 19:02 (nineteen years ago)

(ILX in a nutshell)

Marmot 4-Tay: I'll sip from his well without hesitation. (marmotwolof), Saturday, 29 July 2006 19:04 (nineteen years ago)

i still buy clothes designed for teenagers. i dont really feel like dressing like an adult. maybe in 10 years.

i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Saturday, 29 July 2006 19:10 (nineteen years ago)

that's not a tan jacket, but a shitty jacket. maybe it looks better in *reality* but onscreen that colour just screams poopoo. sorry. :-(

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)


actually i just gave the other pics (on that ebay page) a look and it looks great! so i take back what i said.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

do what you want and fuck the hatas
OTM

-- teh_kit is jayne without the tits (kittenslikemil...), July 29th, 2006. (g-kit) (later)

OTM, sure, but it's not going to make you look any better.

RJG, i'm not really talking about t-shirts/football shirts/sportswear, but that's part of it. i'm talking in general about the kinds of casual wear that men generally do wear & whether it's camper shoes or baggy trousers or stripey t-shirts i usually think that yeah, it would look ok on a toddler but it doesn't look ok on someone in their 30s. i really DO think that people should wear whatever they want to wear but i don't think it follows that they should feel proud of it.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 29 July 2006 20:26 (nineteen years ago)

i still wear baggy jeans and i am in my mid 30s. they're comfortable and anyway, it doesn't look outta place on me OR where i live. so fuck da hatas.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 29 July 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I got it for ridiculously cheap, so if it's uggo in real life at least it's not too expensive a lesson.

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Saturday, 29 July 2006 22:47 (nineteen years ago)

full grown men that wear baggy jeans are idiots. i wear women's jeans.

cutty (mcutt), Saturday, 29 July 2006 23:08 (nineteen years ago)

i've gravitated towards clothes for men (not teenagers) in the past year. I think it has more to do with how awful most streetwear brands seem to be here (i'm 24). i don't want to buy something that i'll be embarassed to wear in six months time.

Mil (Mil), Saturday, 29 July 2006 23:22 (nineteen years ago)

skin tight jeans on long legs look shit. has to be a loose fit, move in it.

stet (stet), Sunday, 30 July 2006 00:32 (nineteen years ago)

how do adults dress?

gem (trisk), Sunday, 30 July 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

like this: http://www.fotosearch.com/comp/DGV/DGV625/741017.jpg

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 30 July 2006 02:21 (nineteen years ago)

i'd love to have the self-confidence to stroll around in a three-piece suite and bowler hat and not feel like a twat. might look a bit odd though.

gem (trisk), Sunday, 30 July 2006 03:31 (nineteen years ago)

I would rather see youthful, well fitting clothing on everyone than another khaki shorts t-shirt athletic sandals baseball cap combo on a so-called adult.

minus the ballcap, this is what i'm wearing right now. i understand the antipathy, but really, shorts-sandals-t-shirt is comfortable. it's what i wear for as much of the hot months as i can get away with. i guess i could wear a tunic or something. i kind of wish there were more tunics available in your average mens store. but don't take away my shorts and sandals, dammit.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 30 July 2006 03:37 (nineteen years ago)

(i'm 36 and i guess my clothes are getting more grown-up, because when my discerning sister visited recently she was impressed by my selection of shirts.)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 30 July 2006 03:38 (nineteen years ago)

dude with derby hat looks like francois mitterand!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 30 July 2006 03:52 (nineteen years ago)

he's got very impressive eyebrows

gem (trisk), Sunday, 30 July 2006 04:07 (nineteen years ago)

what about those oldies you see sometimes, usually in new york or london or whatever, who are decked out in "cool" adults' clothes that became fashionable well after they hit their 30s (or 40s)? some salt-and-pepper haired guy strolling out of a "design" studio in a converted warehouse wearing prada trainers and horn-rimmed glasses, i just wanna be like dude, your nonsquareness is embarrassing

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 30 July 2006 11:49 (nineteen years ago)

shorts-sandals-t-shirt is comfortable, and being comfortable does not make you a horrible person, but rarely if ever in the course of human history has comfortable= fashionable.
I do feel like this is maybe harder to deal with for men, when there are so few styles of dress to choose from, and every thing there is to choose from has all sorts of cultural assumptions attached to it (suit= conservative, khaki shorts= middle class dad, any visible attention paid to grooming= hipster fashion victim).
I think we should replace 'I must start dressing like an adult' with'lately, I feel in the mood to wear clothing that is more tailored.' Or less tailored. The real thing to be wary of is getting stuck wearing the fashions of your younger years just because it just feels comfortable after a while.

Dolores Haze (Arachne), Sunday, 30 July 2006 12:19 (nineteen years ago)

To combine what mothra said with the "too motherfucking hot" thread, I've often thought it would be nice if men in Texas could wear sarongs in summer without risking a gay-bashing. It's as hot here as it is in Polynesia. Yes, I know this is Austin. But it is STILL Texas.

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 30 July 2006 12:29 (nineteen years ago)

i've been dressing totally "grunge" lately - plaid flannel shirts, ripped jeans - of course, this is what i've worn ever since i was about 15. the only difference is that now i'm annnoyed by the rips in my jeans. i've wondered about really going back whole-hog to what i used to wear to high school. bandana, jeans tucked into combat boots, huge sproufy head of curly hair, flannel shirt open and white t-shirt underneath. that was my uniform for years. i had some classmates do a video one time where they even spoofed me by getting the only jewish person in our entire school - mir1am li3b0witz - yeah - to dress up like me. it was totally obvious. maybe i was onto something there, though. russell simmons says almost every truly huge hip hop star is identifiable by just their silhouette. well, i used to be.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 30 July 2006 12:35 (nineteen years ago)

"i've been dressing totally "grunge" lately"

WOT? REAL grunge or that faux marc jacobs shit?

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Sunday, 30 July 2006 12:41 (nineteen years ago)

shorts-sandals-t-shirt is comfortable

i'm thinking a large part of this comfort is psychological - as in not having to think about it. if you approach clothing as a chore than you'll never dress well. if you actually take an interest, you'll likely start to enjoy the whole process. there'll be some slight discomfort as you rub up against your habitual patterns, but being a little brave in this situation might be a good training ground for becoming an adult altogether.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Sunday, 30 July 2006 12:53 (nineteen years ago)

somebody actually got me some marc jacobs corduroys about three years ago. i liked the color so i wore them but the material was so thin that they fell apart after like a year! so, that seems like a fairly real approximation of real grunge. but no, i just mean, i wear the stuff i always wore, the stuff which apparently became "grunge", and have continued to wear it since. the only MAYBE difference is that now the stuff i wear isn't two sizes too big. i'm not sure how that happened. it all shrunk? i got bigger? i don't know. oh i know! it's because is started shopping in the women's section a few years ago. which had a revolutionary effect on my wardrobe.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 30 July 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)

jhoshea completely OTM!

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 30 July 2006 13:08 (nineteen years ago)

i actually sewed the tops of the pockets back on those cords, because the rivets had ripped holes in the butt. i put little panels behind the butt to try to strengthen the stitches, so i kind of had a hippie/grunge thing going on i guess. i don't know what those trousers cost but you shouldn't have to be stitching them after a year, the whole point of riveted corduroys is to be strong.

xpost

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 30 July 2006 13:12 (nineteen years ago)

pics please.

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 30 July 2006 13:14 (nineteen years ago)

i'd love to have the self-confidence to stroll around in a three-piece suite and bowler hat and not feel like a twat. might look a bit odd though.

You might indeed. Although you would probably look "comfortable".

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 30 July 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)

the eunuchs, Cassim and Mustafa, who guarded Abdur Ali's harem (orion), Sunday, 30 July 2006 13:50 (nineteen years ago)

uh didn't mean to sound so schoolmarmish back there or speak from the rarified perspective of an actual adult - rather, growing up is a good thing we can all train in perpetually.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Sunday, 30 July 2006 13:53 (nineteen years ago)

I won't grow up,
(I won't grow up)
I don't want to wear a tie.
(I don't want to wear a tie)
And a serious expression
(And a serious expression)
In the middle of July!
(In the middle of July)
And if it means I must prepare
To shoulder burdens with a worried air,
I'll never grow up, never grow up, never grow up
Not me,
Not I,
Not me!
So there!

Never gonna be a man,
I won't!
Like to see somebody try
And make me.
Anyone who wants to try
And make me turn into a man,
Catch me if you can.

I won't grow up.
Not a penny will I pinch.
I will never grow a mustache,
Or a fraction of an inch.
'Cause growing up is aw-full-er
Than all the awful things that ever were.
I'll never grow up, never grow up, never grow up,
No sir,
Not I,
Not me,
So there!

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 30 July 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

ok you don't have to grow up, but baggy jeans should still be avoided regardless.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Sunday, 30 July 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

On the one hand, I think people should wear clothes that make them feel happy or feel good about themselves. On the other, it would make me happy if more people learned to dress in clothes that helped make them look good. It took me a long time to understand what clothes were flattering on me, but it was great to learn because now I feel much better about myself and have much more self-confidence wrt my appearance.

I work in corporate America, and I'm really sick of seeing guys dressed in golf shirts and khakis. It is really horrible. I don't support dress codes at work, but I do wish people would make an effort to look good.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Sunday, 30 July 2006 15:57 (nineteen years ago)

I'm really sick of seeing guys dressed in golf shirts and khakis. It is really horrible.

yes!

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Sunday, 30 July 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)

But please note that I'm not implying that I'd like to see more people where t-shirts and jeans to work either. I want people to see some classy outfits!

Matt Olken (Moodles), Sunday, 30 July 2006 16:11 (nineteen years ago)

i'm thinking a large part of this comfort is psychological - as in not having to think about it.

no no, shorts-tee-sandals is comfortable comfortable. when it's hot and sticky, it's the closest you can get to going naked and still be able to walk down the street without getting funny looks. (you can ditch the shirt altogether, i guess, but that risks sunburn and anyway not many of us guys have torsos that we're proud enough of to display so nonchalantly). i do wish western men's clothes would pick up on some of the loose robe-y stuff from asia and africa, especially with the planet melting and all.

i have no objection to dressing well -- i'd love to have a fully tailored wardrobe -- but don't underplay the effort and expense it entails.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 30 July 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

I feel like men in the Midwest either dress like children or adults -- and I mean "adult" in the pleated-khakis, plaid shirted way, like middle-class dads. It's like they're the analog of Medieval Europe in not having an in-between-aged culture. Gross.

holy shit that's so correct my head is going to explode.

gbx (skowly), Sunday, 30 July 2006 17:58 (nineteen years ago)

Haha, thanks, gib. I should add that I'm not including various "youth" subcultures, now appropriated by 20- and 30-somethings -- I'm saying that, with a few exceptions, those "indie/brainy hipster" standards like well-fitting jeans and Pumas and good streetwear kinds of things have just never made it to the Midwest. Which takes all the fun out of looking at the menfolk.

Laurel (Laurel), Sunday, 30 July 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

i should start taking pictures of all the dweebs out here in montana.

gbx (skowly), Sunday, 30 July 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

I suppose if you want to get technical there are shorts and there are Shorts. You can do anything with style or without it, after all. The style takes more inital effort to discern and seek out for purchase, but once it's in your closet even Tshirts and sandals get new life because you picked them out with some kind of guiding aesthetic -- but it's a matter of priorities.

OMG you totally should. We're going to hell anyway, might as well.

Laurel (Laurel), Sunday, 30 July 2006 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

What would be more useful to those of us who are (ahem) sartorially-challenged would be pictures of stuff we should wear.

(Especially stuff that's wearable in 95-degree heat, with no A/C. And that costs less than $80 for a complete outfit. Yeah.)

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Sunday, 30 July 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, this --

i have no objection to dressing well -- i'd love to have a fully tailored wardrobe -- but don't underplay the effort and expense it entails.

-- is totally OTM: if you're making less than $20k a year, buying fancy tailored stuff just isn't on.

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Sunday, 30 July 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.aerostar.com/protective/images/aircrew_dry_coveralls.jpg

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 30 July 2006 19:04 (nineteen years ago)

Hm, okay -- I don't have a great feel for menswear -- I just know what I like when I see it -- but I'll take a shot:

BAD: http://cdn.llbean.com/products/mens/36416/images/M36416_Heritage_Khaki.jpg

Potentially quite good: http://www.oldnavy.com/Asset_Archive/ONWeb/Assets/Product/400/400403/main/on400403-00p01v01.jpg:

Laurel (Laurel), Sunday, 30 July 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

Err, http://www.oldnavy.com/Asset_Archive/ONWeb/Assets/Product/400/400403/main/on400403-00p01v01.jpg

Laurel (Laurel), Sunday, 30 July 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

that reminds me of clothing tips someone wrote for republicans coming to the '04 convention in nyc. there were various snarky things, but the one i remember was "NO PLEATS!"

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 30 July 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)

(although in truth i see a lot of pleats on the subway, and they're not all tourists)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 30 July 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)

there is a dude in a utilikilt sitting at the next table over, here at the coffee shop.

gbx (skowly), Sunday, 30 July 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

those shorts are b-a-d

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 30 July 2006 19:49 (nineteen years ago)

Fashion lectures amuse me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 30 July 2006 19:54 (nineteen years ago)

I enjoy wearing my three piece suit, but there aren't many opportunities to do so really. Dig a lot of the old style fashions when it comes to hats, but it can be tough to find high quality ones in this day and age.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Sunday, 30 July 2006 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

I am surprised to learn that Tuomas is younger than I am.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 30 July 2006 20:25 (nineteen years ago)

I want a utilikilt so bad, but I'm nowhere near secure enough to actually wear one. And it would probably be hot anyway.

milo z (mlp), Sunday, 30 July 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

whenever you start wondering when you should dress like an adult is when you should start dressing like an adult.

oops (Oops), Sunday, 30 July 2006 20:46 (nineteen years ago)

I agree trying to dress well does take more money and time. It is a source of satisfaction too though, and in my opinion well worth the effort. But you can't make people feel this if they are not that way inclined by nature.
This has been an issue at my work recently (home to some of the worse dressed people in Wanganui). Two of the flash women in community relations have been wearing their trackpants and t shirts to work to make a point to the incredibly badly dressed people in technical support. Unfortunately the TS people just don't register clothing, either their own or other people's, so no one noticed and after a week in trackpants the flash dressers couldn't take it any more and switched back. The moral being that what you personally are wearing matters much more than what other people are wearing and, by a happy coincidence, that's the one you can control.

isadora (isadora), Sunday, 30 July 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

dress like mick jagger..

lAUrEl ANNE dOWNS (GoDdAMN GOrGEOUS), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

Guys in suits are hottttt.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:07 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a157/RJG123/3.jpg

I have seven outfits identical to this that I wear for work/leisure

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)

RJG, you are more of a treat than I even remembered.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

8 )

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)

fucksake!

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:34 (nineteen years ago)

Though I think you should post a picture of your three-quarter length stripey trousers too.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:35 (nineteen years ago)

oh, I would if I could

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)

RJG, now that's what I'm talking about! I wish I had such sharp outfits!

Matt Olken (Moodles), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

When this thread started I interpreted dressing "like a child" as...not caring what fits or what goes together, which I guess still holds for this thread. But in thinking about it I realize that there's a huge happy medium of relatively youthful options that are still reasonably casual and yet look like the wearer is paying attention...you don't have to suddenly switch to tassel loafers (euurgh) and navy sportscoats. (In fact, please don't.)

I also realize this is why both of my brothers freaked the fuck out when they had to go shopping for their first suits -- one of them actually broke into a cold sweat and had to leave the store because of the pressure of his own idea of adulthood; I suspect he didn't have any mental models for being self-sufficient without "selling out". The Midwest is a weird place sometimes.

Laurel (Laurel), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:48 (nineteen years ago)

There also comes a point where clothes just look too young on a person or don't really work anymore. Like women in their 30s that shop in Juniors. There's a point where you have to give it up.

I wonder if I will reach a certain age where I'll feel compelled to dress like a senior citizen.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Sunday, 30 July 2006 21:58 (nineteen years ago)

Well, of course! I mean, it can feel like there really aren't any clothing options for men that don't instantly make you completely pigeonhole-able. If you're someone who really doesn't want to wear a uniform of some kind, it can be hard to figure out what to do next -- how to escape from the feeling that no matter what you do, you'll be unwittingly putting yourself into some sort of "type".

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:00 (nineteen years ago)

lurker, it may feel that way, but it is definitely not the case. I strongly believe that you can dress in "adult" clothes and still completely cultivate your own personal look or style. It takes effort and a sense of self, but it is very doable.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

shorts are unacceptable, unless you are at the beach, or doing some kind of sport, or modelling shorts for a shorts company

-- (688), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:05 (nineteen years ago)

I know, it's just demoralizing. I mean, the whole brouhaha over pleats -- if they're so awful, why do stores keep selling them? I don't see, visually, what's so intrinsically bad about them vs. non-pleated pants.

Given things like that, it's hard to feel like I can go into a store and find choices that are "safe". It'd be nice if there were an affordable store where you could go and know that anything you buy is OK and not something that's going to get you smirked at.

(btw my post was an xpost to Laurel)

xpost Um, whatever.

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

its ok to wear a tie. but it must only be one colour

-- (688), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)

is a joke?

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

I think a big part of identifying good clothes comes down to understanding what your body type is and what clothes work with that. I'm not very tall, so pleated pants just look puffy and ridiculous on me. On a tall, thin person, they might not be so horrible.

Once I got a sense of what fit me well, it was a lot easier to find stuff that I liked and that looked good on me. I can't say that I've found a lot of great, inexpensive clothes though...

Matt Olken (Moodles), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:25 (nineteen years ago)

Good looking adult menswear gets expensive real fast, esp if you are like me and can't wear anything off the rack.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:48 (nineteen years ago)

I strongly believe that you can dress in "adult" clothes and still completely cultivate your own personal look or style.

Sure. Just wear black.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 30 July 2006 22:56 (nineteen years ago)

Clearly RJG should have been cast as Crocket in the new MICHAEL MANN film Miami Vice!

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Sunday, 30 July 2006 23:04 (nineteen years ago)

I like how the phrase "sad sack" has spread across to Finland. :)

JTS (JTS), Sunday, 30 July 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)

Is the realm of adult clothing much smaller than that of child-like clothing? Is any outfit involving jeans or t-shirts automatically not adult?


how come Sam Cassell and Russell Simmons look weird in the way they dress

Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 30 July 2006 23:56 (nineteen years ago)

Browsing around online to see what's out there...I like the look of these pants, I guess:

http://www.mensflair.com/media/mens-linen-pants-dolce.jpg

But I can't afford to pay $132 for them! On sale, no less! And linen is pretty fragile, isn't it? One slip, a little red wine or spaghetti sauce in the wrong place, and poof, there goes $132...

Meanwhile, I was looking at some of the featured fashions on the Details site: $650 for a sweater? $300 for a pair of jeans? Yikes!

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 00:35 (nineteen years ago)

Good looking adult menswear gets expensive real fast, esp if you are like me and can't wear anything off the rack.

otm. In my case, every tall men's shop I've ever seen is an timewarp horrorhouse of pleats and rayon and polyester and wilted polo-golf-elastic-easyfit shit, plus they figure every person going there is just a MOUNTAIN OF A MAN so you'll see pant waists starting at 40" for example, nothing for the lanky among us. Old Navy, of all places, is the only place I can reliably get semi-fashionable casual pants off the rack, which means I have to deal with my clothes falling apart after 6 months or so. Been meaning to troll downtown L.A. for a whole new, more formal wardrobe for work and elsewhere, just been putting it off.

tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 31 July 2006 02:20 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I've got the double whammy of extreme slenderness and being short. So, even on the rare occasion when I can find pants with a waist size that is even close, inseam is way too long. With jackets and shirts, it's just an impossibility.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Monday, 31 July 2006 02:32 (nineteen years ago)

RJG's suit is fantastic. so white though! I would be deathly afraid of spilling something on it.

HPSTRKRFT (haitch), Monday, 31 July 2006 02:38 (nineteen years ago)

i leave this thread for a few hours and people are recommending cargo shorts?

Good looking adult menswear gets expensive real fast, esp if you are like me and can't wear anything off the rack.

sales, used - get creative, does not have to be expensive

So, even on the rare occasion when I can find pants with a waist size that is even close, inseam is way too long. With jackets and shirts, it's just an impossibility.

go to a tailor, it's not v expensive. there are no pants made in my size, so this is a regular occurrence for me. try chinatown (if they have one of those where you are).

how come Sam Cassell and Russell Simmons look weird in the way they dress

this is an utterly fascinating question - im gonna think on it.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Monday, 31 July 2006 03:29 (nineteen years ago)

OTM jhoshea!

Clothes can get expensive, but it's hardly an intractable problem. If you want to dress well, you can find a way even on a modest budget. Creativity is key!

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 31 July 2006 03:34 (nineteen years ago)

Tailor is what I end up doing, but as I said, this is rather expensive here at least. End result is some quite nice clothing, just it is rare for me to have reason/need to really dress up. So I can see why other people don't bother spending the money.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Monday, 31 July 2006 03:38 (nineteen years ago)

surely my world will fall apart if ilx thinks i'm unfashionable.

teh_kit is jayne without the tits (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 08:40 (nineteen years ago)

today i am wearing an Oxes t-shirt that is clearly made for a 17 stone man. it feels like i'm camping at glastonbury or something, i could get a few more people, their camping gear, a crate of stella and a spare sleeping bag in here with me. AMIHOTORNOT.

teh_kit is jayne without the tits (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 08:43 (nineteen years ago)

the answer to the initial question is "when you start balding". bald generally makes you look old (there are exceptions - you have to be VERY fresh-faced to be one of these though).

on the bus sometimes i see these noo meeja wankers all the time, with their regulation hipster specs and 'funky' t-shirts and low-slung jeans and trendy trainers and scarves and shit - and then they have their paunches hanging out, and they haven't shaved properly (in a lazy-slob way rather than a designer-stubble way), and their hairline is receding - sometimes i see the most pathetic attempts to create a hairstyle out of little more than one tuft of remaining hair. and it looks so, so lame, and sometimes i laugh out loud at them.

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 July 2006 08:47 (nineteen years ago)

meanie.

teh_kit is jayne without the tits (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 08:48 (nineteen years ago)

for a second, i thought you said "create a lifestyle out of little more than one tuft of remaining hair", and i was quite impressed that there would be people prepared to tackle such a gargantuan task

-- (688), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:04 (nineteen years ago)

in a way, creating a lifestyle from a tuft of hair was exactly what he was trying to do :(

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:25 (nineteen years ago)

do they sometimes laugh out loud at you?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:36 (nineteen years ago)

no!

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:41 (nineteen years ago)

what do the grime-listening kids wear?

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:43 (nineteen years ago)

LOL xpost bah

teh_kit is jayne without the tits (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:44 (nineteen years ago)

the grime kids wear v baggy tracksuits (boys) or skinny jeans with cool tops (girls). normally the girls have great hair. once i saw some hackney girls wearing torn slipknot tops though.

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 July 2006 10:06 (nineteen years ago)

now y'see, the baggy tracksuit look is shit, isn't it?

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 10:12 (nineteen years ago)

i like it, sometimes they wear the tracksuits ridiculously low => i get to perv on some v nice arses

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 July 2006 10:48 (nineteen years ago)

do they sometimes laugh out loud at you?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 10:49 (nineteen years ago)

if i said, "i like perving on 15 year old girls' arses", i think there would be disapproval, really.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 10:55 (nineteen years ago)

I don't follow fashion. Who needs it when you got style?

100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Monday, 31 July 2006 10:57 (nineteen years ago)

yeah but you're you, nrq, and i am me

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 July 2006 11:31 (nineteen years ago)

I think after 30 or so you should only wear band t-shirts when you're exercising or cleaning the house. This says "Yes, I've had this excellent taste in music and clothing my whole life, and I'd never throw these shirts away and still love wearing them, but I've chosen to age gracefully." Wearing them out says either "check out how cool I used to be, 300 wash-cycles ago" or "I'm not too old to want to be judged by my taste in music!"

Best grown-up outfit: Jeans, nice belt, white shirt with open collar, crisply cut dark jacket.

antexit (antexit), Monday, 31 July 2006 11:37 (nineteen years ago)

what kind of knickers do the grime boys wear, The Lex?

antexit: *BARF*

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 11:41 (nineteen years ago)

Look, shorts were already on the table, I had to find something acceptable for comparison hence the cargo shorts. I don't mind 'em, actually, but I have a weakness for really, really old, soft Army/Navy surplus-type weekend wear. WEEKEND. For pottering around the house and biking/beaching.

Auntie X, you are an enduring classic, I thought of your suits just the other day.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)

Everybody else: I think were expenditure is concerned there are certain limitations. You can spend time on your clothes, keeping a lookout for sales and taking time to go through racks of designer samples etc, and look very good for not much $. Or you can spend lots of $$ and save yourself the time and effort. But you can't have both.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 11:51 (nineteen years ago)

on the bus sometimes i see these noo meeja wankers all the time, with their regulation hipster specs and 'funky' t-shirts and low-slung jeans and trendy trainers and scarves and shit - and then they have their paunches hanging out, and they haven't shaved properly (in a lazy-slob way rather than a designer-stubble way), and their hairline is receding

Oh no.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 31 July 2006 11:56 (nineteen years ago)

Ha

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 11:59 (nineteen years ago)

Lovely Laurel! I never wear suits anymore now that I work in an office. They're all left to wither on the vine. Clotheshanger, that is. I only wear them to go out to dinner. Or, more recently, to go play House of the Dead 3. See, you got to be correct for that kind of thing.

antexit (antexit), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:06 (nineteen years ago)

the answer to the initial question is "when you start balding". bald generally makes you look old.

:( I'd best get some proper clothes then.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:08 (nineteen years ago)

shorts are unacceptable, unless you are at the beach, or doing some kind of sport, or modelling shorts for a shorts company

as usual, g. is right.

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:10 (nineteen years ago)

on the bus sometimes i see these noo meeja wankers all the time, with their regulation hipster specs and 'funky' t-shirts and low-slung jeans and trendy trainers and scarves and shit - and then they have their paunches hanging out, and they haven't shaved properly (in a lazy-slob way rather than a designer-stubble way), and their hairline is receding

It's not a receeding hairline, it's a widow's peak.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not even sure shorts are well-advised at the beach. I was just at the seaside for a couple of days, and let my legs, which haven't seen the light of day in ages, hang out past the shade of my umbrella for a few hours. I now have the standard city tan, brown face, shoulders, and arms, my usual yogurty-white chest and belly, and angry pink thighs. I look like a quart of neapolitan ice cream.

antexit (antexit), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)

Stores keep selling pleats because people keep buying 'em, I think. Do your part to stop the madness. Also, there's no such thing as a store where you can buy anything and be "safe", unless you ask the shopkeeper to pick you out a whole new wardrobe -- yes, unless you want to pay someone else to pick and choose, style is something you have to work out for yourself.

You're right, though, that it helps to start simple -- or better yet, start by just looking at things, not buying. Then buy one piece at a time, as you think it over and get comfortable with the idea. "Hm, grey flannel trousers. Am I a flannel kind of guy? What'll they go with, how will I wear them" etc etc. When you feel good about something, THEN purchase.

One cannot look like RJG just overnight, obv.

AX: I recommend some judicious sun-bathing on the roof of your building in the pre-beach season.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)

once i was on a plane, and i was surrounded by maybe 60 sportsmen, and they sang "i like short shorts" for 10 hours

i wish they had pleated faces

-- (688), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:24 (nineteen years ago)

Best grown-up outfit: Jeans, nice belt, white shirt with open collar, crisply cut dark jacket.

This girl I used to date said (half-ironically, though) that real men always wear a belt. What's the deal with this? I only wear if I have pants that are baggy enough that they're in danger of falling down.

For men, is it a sign of adulthood that you start wearing your shirt inside your pants, and a belt on top of that? Because I hate wearing shirts inside my pants, once I start doing that I must've irredeemably turned into a grown-up.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

shorts are kind of nasty.

so is the beach tho. don't want sand in ears/elsewhere.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:30 (nineteen years ago)

go to a tailor, it's not v expensive. there are no pants made in my size, so this is a regular occurrence for me. try chinatown (if they have one of those where you are).

actually this is not correct. getting trousers shortened is cheap - anything else is certainly not.

most people wear a belt whether their trousers would fall down without one or not. stop pretending that that is some kind of mind blowing fact.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:32 (nineteen years ago)

tucked-in shirts... a lot of shirts are made to be tucked in, i think. they're all weird at the bottom and look stupid and ungainly out. i try not to wear these, cos i don't like a tucked in shirt.

nothing wrong with belts.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, but I really don't see the point, unless you are a rocker and have a belt with a cool buckle or something.

(x-post)

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:36 (nineteen years ago)

I have been looking for good-fitting gray wool trousers for years now.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:39 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe flannel would work too, though

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:41 (nineteen years ago)

If I can't find some in another year or two maybe they will no longer be appropriate

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:42 (nineteen years ago)

you will find them! they are too classic to give up the search for.

belts tie a look together, like functional jewelery

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:43 (nineteen years ago)

Sport shirts: any woven cotton (please) shirt not necessarily meant to be worn with a tie. Has medium-length tails that can be left untucked if desired, may be fuller in the body and looser in the neck because it doesn't have to lie flat under a suit. Liable to come in interesting colors/prints.

Dress shirts: also woven cotton but trimmer-fitting, shouldn't be able to get more than two fingers in the collar. Tails are long to stay tucked in all day, and will look disproportionate out. Can have serveral styles of collar (pointed/spread/tab/etc), tie basically a "must" with all of them.

Better?

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)

you should maybe just go to a tailor and get them made, maybe even 2 pairs. i think in many people's minds this is super expensive, but it is not, esp for classic items - pants, shirts.

i just discovered a shoemaker who can remake my favourite shoes which one day soon are going to fall apart omg.

xpost :)

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:47 (nineteen years ago)

Yay for cobblers! I have performed ridiculous degrees of shoe rescue on falling-apart vintage stuff, like, with glue sticks and magic markers that promptly ran in the rain. Cobblers are better.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:51 (nineteen years ago)

They also have a nice symmetry with your shoes, and prevent your shirt from getting blousy when you bend around or sit down, and lining up the buckle with the buttons of your shirt looks extra clean!

xp Enrique, I think pretty much all men's shirts, even polo shirts, were originally meant to be tucked in. The big innovation of Lacoste at some point was having a longer back than front so it wouldn't come out during tennis. The untucked button-down shirt-- where did I read that it was started by teenagers who wanted to hide their involuntary boners? This also explains the big jersey and the nightgown-style white t!

antexit (antexit), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:51 (nineteen years ago)

The untucked button-down shirt-- where did I read that it was started by teenagers who wanted to hide their involuntary boners?

haha!

i guess some shirts have longer tails than others.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 12:53 (nineteen years ago)

haha, next time i see a middle-aged guy wearing an untucked dress shirt that is meant to be tucked i'm going to ask him if he's hiding his boner.

now i'm thinking that pleated pants are for hiding small boners.

i'm also thinking that the word boner is freakin hilarious.

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:01 (nineteen years ago)

Yep, it's one of those words that has infinite mileage. I think you may be right about pleated pants, too! I never understood how they were supposed to hide a paunch. But that poofy, sexless area they create around a guy's groin-- Pure anticipation! Unzipping triple-pleated pants must be like opening a Christmas present in the dark.

antexit (antexit), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:15 (nineteen years ago)

Gross. Shut up, both of you.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:18 (nineteen years ago)

And the discussion of the proper length of shirttails turned, naturally it seemed at the time, to a lot of frank talk of boners and their habitats. Another thread forever polluted.

antexit (antexit), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:22 (nineteen years ago)

i know pants fit well if you can see "my cut"

TWOUMASS (ex machina), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:24 (nineteen years ago)

back to the anti-shorts zealotry here, tho -- and allowing that shorts are a choice driven by function over form -- are y'all giving men no options in hot weather then, except full-length trousers? seems unfair. women can wear skirts of varying lengths depending on the season, why are men condemned to full cover? what about those of us who like the feel of air on skin?

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:37 (nineteen years ago)

they should wear skirts too.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:39 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, for sure. People come up to me all the time and say "That's Mohel Levine's work, right?"

(xp)

antexit (antexit), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:40 (nineteen years ago)

Ah Gypsy, you speak my mind. (Personally, I think those who complain the loudest about shorts are more than likely jealous they cannot wear them themselves, for whatever reason.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:42 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, there's nothing wrong with shorts if comfort is your number-one priority when leaving the house. They seem to make a lot of sense. They take up less space in the drawer than full-length pants, they cost less to wash, you're much less likely to get your cuff dirty...

antexit (antexit), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)

I was going to go the bris route with that one, too, but got distracted by "work". Blech.

Shorts: I don't hate 'em, I know it's the thing to hold them in high contempt but I do love beach and resort wear done a little bit askew (perhaps comes of growing up a townie in a resort area). It's just when they're bad, they're very VERY bad. And while I'm a confirmed slob in my home-time, I like the push towards some degree of formality in public. Not saying head-to-heel seersucker or anything (although I've seen some REMARKABLE suits around Rock Center lately), just a nudge in the right direction.

Oh, XP.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

like girls wear skirt because of the weather.

guys look great in shorts as long as they are this kind:

http://www.shockadelic.com/0412.jpg

viva la 70s

sunny successor (katharine), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:49 (nineteen years ago)

We've come back to the orig post, actually -- where clothing is concerned, convenience, space-savingness, stain resistance, etc are the considerations of children (or their exhausted parents). Fine for weekend project-casual! Not fine for anything anyone will see you at!

Possibly harder to interpret in the suburbs when you have to drive to big box stores all day running errands with three kids in tow? I mean, I'm not unsympathetic. But then, people in those kinds of situations don't give a shit whether ILX likes their shorts anyway, they've got other things to worry about.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)

i can and do wear shorts if the situation calls for it - namely, the gym. jealousy doesn't enter into it. there are always exceptions, but in general i think that there's something ridiculous about shorts, especially on men.

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 31 July 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)

wtf, is everyone hating on shorts here?
if it's hot, i wear shorts. common sense, surely? not like, hotpants or anything, or 80s football shorts. just something that comes down just below the knee.
what the fucking fuck is wrong with wearing shorts? it's fucking summer. STRANGE PEOPLE.

people for which fashion is more important than comfort should be shot, then deported, then brought back to the country, and hanged, then everyone can point at their sweaty crotch stain and be like "ewwwwwww!"

(i am being very silly here, but it's still odd)

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

Working at home, alone, in a hot climate -- comfort trumps all. I've had long pants on for a total of six hours over the last three months.

Whitman Mayonnaise (Rock Hardy), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

I don't find shorts that ridiculous until men go tucking their shirts into them, and then they seem somehow like hypocracy.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)

i don't like shorts.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)

legs get hot?

sunny successor (katharine), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:03 (nineteen years ago)

Not fine for anything anyone will see you at!

*rolls eyes*

Folks, I wear shorts in my Everyday Working World Situation, the mild winters excepted, because:

1) I live in Southern California and frankly that is reason enough at least nine months out of the year

2) There is no formal dress code situation at work, which is one of the best benefits about this place -- I think requirements about what specifically to wear at work outside of a military/uniformed practice context are stupidly petty

3) As has been noted, it is comfortable, and if there is a choice between working and feeling comfortable and working and NOT feeling comfortable, then what the hell are you going to think I'm going to choose?

When I'm out at dinner with friends, on a date, at a get-together, nine times out of ten I will be dressing far more formally precisely because I enjoy dressing more formally for THOSE situations. And that is I think all that has to be said about it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:04 (nineteen years ago)

ankles, sure. but legs?

sunny successor (katharine), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:04 (nineteen years ago)

just something that comes down just below the knee.

if they go below the knee, why not just wear pants? do shins get that hot?

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:10 (nineteen years ago)

it let the breeze flow where it needs to, hm?
it's like the difference between long/short sleeve shirts.

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:11 (nineteen years ago)

I wear shorts when it's hot. My personal comfort overrides any discomfort squeemish citizens feel at looking at my hairy toothpick-thin legs.

Monday
92°F (33°C) | 75°F (24°C)

Tuesday
95°F (35°C) | 80°F (27°C)

Wednesday
95°F (35°C) | 76°F (24°C)

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

4) NED'S SEXY CALVES

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:15 (nineteen years ago)

every male fashion thread ever on ILX becomes a discussion about shorts.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:15 (nineteen years ago)

actually, i like the old-school lacoste shorts. however, you have to be near a tennis court for them not to look silly.

xpost - shorts and sandals for men are seriously polarizing issues.

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)

so true

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)

4) NED'S SEXY CALVES

Oh baby, etc.

every male fashion thread ever on ILX becomes a discussion about shorts.

I can only conclude many ILXors were attacked by shorts when they were children and have been scarred.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)

Though I think you should post a picture of your three-quarter length stripey trousers too

forgot I had this photo but it doesn't really show but these trousers stop just where the picture does

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v515/RJG/ed.jpg

I don't mind!

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)

nothing else could explain the extreme levels of shortsophobia
xpost

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:18 (nineteen years ago)

What I don't get about that fact, about how they always become shorts discussions, is that the main argument pro-shorts is, "I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE FASHION! I CARE ABOUT THE COMFORT!" which begs the question, why are you reading and contributing to a thread about fashion? Please stop trying to confuse the poor gentlemen who are trying to learn about looking sharp with your political agenda for hairy leg liberation!

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

If we are going to talk about shorts, am I the only girl who HATES HATES HATES the slightly longer than usual panties they try to pass off on us as shorts? Not comfy. :c

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

We are rebels

http://www.confedalot.com/KIPP200.jpg

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

I like how there is a permanent wedgie look going on there.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:21 (nineteen years ago)

i wore shorts yesterday, but I didn't leave williamsburg, shower or shave. I ate stinky tacos and played with a dog. booyah. They looked ok but not to go anywhere

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:21 (nineteen years ago)

why are you reading and contributing to a thread about fashion?

Because at a certain point one gets irritated with the fact that everyone else's insecurities get turned into dogma.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

why are you reading and contributing to a thread about fashion?

exercising our rights to express our opinion, nonetheless. and this isn't a thread exclusively about fashion, it's also about getting older. which is something EVERYONE is doing. so we read the thread.

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, it boils down to this:

1) 90% of shorts pretty much look like shit (moreso men's than women's, and no, not because of some sexist "Women should be nakeder than men" thing, but purely on a design aesthetic)
2) 90% of men have no idea how to dress which results in them pairing the said hideous khaki pleated front shorts with, like, a band t-shirt, white socks and tevas for some ungodly reason. None of it goes together or looks remotely ok.

If you are fine with this personally then go for it but don't expect us all to condone it or say it looks good. Because it doesn't. It's not like there aren't certain rare instances of well-made shorts, or certain men who know how to dress where it actually doesn't make them looked like crazed middle-aged dads or huge, huge stoners to dress like that but seriously, the laws of averages say that most of you don't fall into that category (and those of you who do, your wife or gf is dressing the rest of your shorts-outfit and you should admit it).

More confusing than any of this is the new women's "dress shorts" thing. Making 30 year old women look even more like crazed, retarded versions of Jodie Foster in Taxi Driver, a never-ending quest, a story by H&M.

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

also, please note my absence from threads exclusively about fashion.

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)

btw, a lot of women look like shit too.

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)

This may also be a CA vs NY kind of debate. I hear lots of positive things about California but I don't think I'm a West Coast kind of girl.

Ahahah, Ally. Yes. Also, based on fashions for this summer/fall, I think that the designers really hate women. Not even secretly. I mean, there are always some unlikely ideas being floated on the runways but I can't remember a time when things looked THIS bad at the off-the-rack stage. Le sigh.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

It's not about insecurities and it's kind of weird and offensive that you have claimed this on shorts threads left and right, Ned.

hi g-kit care to actually read my post? The whole fucking last paragraph is about women looking like shit?

You're both intolerable on this subject. OMG sorryz that shorts are not fashion. Where is that siren alert graphic?

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

Yea, H&M skirts are only ok for college students. Hopefully we can agree on this.

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)

I actually think women's shorts tend to be even uglier than men's shorts. And yeah, the new women's "formal shorts" are incomprehensible.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

What are some hot weather alternatives to shorts then? If I was to go for a walk in humid 95 degree weather, what could I wear that wouldn't kill me?

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

jon williams, mediator.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

The no-shorts thing is way weird, who the fuck doesnt wear shorts? Someone in 100+ degree heat wearing long pants is a fashion disaster.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

Ahahah, Ally. Yes. Also, based on fashions for this summer/fall, I think that the designers really hate women. Not even secretly. I mean, there are always some unlikely ideas being floated on the runways but I can't remember a time when things looked THIS bad at the off-the-rack stage. Le sigh.

Good lord yes. I always kind of feel bad when I see these tragic "bought the entire mannequin's outfit" fashion girls, it's like the opposite of this men "WE MUST BE COMFORTABLE ABOVE ALL ELSE" issue, being violently uncomfortable just to look worse than women wandering around in sweatsuits. I don't understand what is going on with the racks at all this year.

xpost women seem to have a wider variety of shorts than men do. On both I think I prefer sporty gym gear to any other type of short.

Allyzay knows where the interfacing goes. (allyzay), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

wait, arent pants that go just below your knee called peddlepushers??

sunny successor (katharine), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

ah, laurel! i'm EXCITED for fall fashion. tartans, sweater dresses, ankle boots, lots of dark purple and grey and gold (not all together, of course)... what's not to like?

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:33 (nineteen years ago)

COMFORT UBER ALLY

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

Ally, sorry not 2 read properly.

to clarify, though: in no way do i think shorts are some kind of fashionable item. i work with molten lead. i will not wear long trousers at work. outside of work, i play lots of frisbee. so i wear shorts. travelling, car or walking, very hot. shorts plz.
also, quite often, i have chicks chasing me because i look so fucking hott in my shorts, so i need shorts to outrun them. +2 to agility in shorts.

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:36 (nineteen years ago)

maybe next summer, i'll wear leather pants, so i can get both sides of the story. you can't appreciate someone else's position until you've walked a mile in their pants, after all.

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)

that's double funny, cos i am a britisher.

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)

What are some hot weather alternatives to shorts then? If I was to go for a walk in humid 95 degree weather, what could I wear that wouldn't kill me?

Slightly wide-legged linen pants? In white if you're feeling unspillable, or maybe unbleached linen or a nice soft neutral beige/olive/slate of some kind. Just one suggestion.

Lauren, sweater dresses make me saaaaaad, although I can get with the tartan thing. I've got a lot of sewing to do there, but it's impossible to even HANDLE wool in this weather.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)

MEAT HATS

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

What are some hot weather alternatives to shorts then?

i'm totally pro-shorts, but like lauren says, there are nice, light linen trousers. i used to have a pair i liked a lot, i should buy some more. perfect sort of thing for, you know, picnicking on clipped lawns. things like this.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

What I don't get about that fact, about how they always become shorts discussions, is that the main argument pro-shorts is, "I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE FASHION! I CARE ABOUT THE COMFORT!" which begs the question, why are you reading and contributing to a thread about fashion?

Well, the thing is, a lot of the stuff being said here makes sense, but a blanket ban on shorts seems like it comes from bizarro-world. The two motivations I can see are either: (a) you have a lifestyle in which you spend all your days in air-conditioned comfort, and can't relate to the experience of driving to work in a 100-degree car with no A/C, or (b) you think that men's bodies, or at least men's legs, are disgusting/unattractive and should be covered up.

I mean, the notion that people can't look good in shorts -- I see people, men and women, in shorts all the time, and they look great! I can think of three times this summer, easily, that I've seen an attractive woman in shorts and had, let's say, an experience of immediate visceral aesthetic appreciation.

So the stuff about wearing tailored clothing, for instance -- that intuitively makes sense, even if it's depressing on the $$ front, and doesn't seem...ideological? But "no shorts, ever" doesn't feel like "how to look good and feel good", it feels like trendy, "how to do what some rich people in NYC/Paris/whatever who have never had to work a day in their lives say you're supposed to do". And that latter is why so many men don't bother with this shit.

xpost OK, you covered (b), but I'm still left with (a). Again, if you think that 10% of shorts can look good, post pictures of the fucking 10%!

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

This may also be a CA vs NY kind of debate

I'm beginning to think so.

It's not about insecurities and it's kind of weird and offensive that you have claimed this on shorts threads left and right, Ned

As far as I'm concerned, there's a difference between dressing appropriately for everyday life -- at this point and place that means, as I see it, clean clothes, showering daily, washed hair, trimmed nails etc. -- and 'fashion' as arbitrary fixed rule. Maybe insecurity is the wrong word, but there's something ultimately pretty damn strange about it all.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

there's no conspiracy

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:46 (nineteen years ago)

But RJG, you would make a great conspiracy leader.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:46 (nineteen years ago)

Jeans or trousers aren't actually that warm are they? Maybe Ireland just isn't as humid as other places but I've never found long trousers to be insanely warm.

I, guiltily, feel like posting that thing from the noise board where someone found 10 instances of Ned discussing "robes" now.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)

I wear suits or equivalent biz-casual-wear 5 days a week, and whatever the fuck I want, shorts included, the other 2. I do think that the anti-shorts is sometimes or often anti-body/insecurity, while I'm pro-shorts in part for the same reason.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)

a robe and a robe and a robe and a bat

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)

Ronan - dunno, I never find myself standing around going "brrr, I've got cold legs". Possibly because you move them more than any other part of your body so you don't need them to be wrapped as warmly.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)

someone found 10 instances of Ned discussing "robes" now

:-D I hope they were flowing. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

we need a shorts FAP

teh_kit haev been evicted, oh noes! (g-kit), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

Lurker, no one can post pictures of shorts that will be safely "good" because probably 80% of whether a particular pair are "good" will depend on who wears them, and how. What shirt, what shoes, what occasion, etc. This is why I counseled earlier that, if you want to get good at dressing well, it's best to start small and build a personal style as you get braver. At some point you may see some glad rags in a window somewhere and be quite surprised to realize that you have an opinion of your own, at which point I recommend a celebratory drink and a shopping trip.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

re: fall -- living in the northeast, one thing i love about the transitional months -- late september to mid-november, say -- is that i feel like, as a guy, that's the time i have the most options for dressing well in ways that are also comfortable and make sense for the weather. (springtime too, to some degree, except that half the time in spring it's all parkas and duck boots.) jackets, sweaters, there's a lot of different things you can do.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

White linen pants might be OK, but I feel like I'd be very lucky to wear a pair of those three, four times without ending up with something on them (red wine, spaghetti sauce, lizard semen) that left a permanent stain and rendered them unwearable.

When it's hot and I've got jeans on, I can feel my legs cooking!

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah Matt I meant more the other POV, that jeans are not overly warm in hot weather, shorts are not a necessity as such. short sleeves, definitely, not shorts tho, IMO, legs don't really get very hot or very cold.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

red wine, spaghetti sauce, lizard semen

All at once?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

But "no shorts, ever" doesn't feel like "how to look good and feel good", it feels like trendy, "how to do what some rich people in NYC/Paris/whatever who have never had to work a day in their lives say you're supposed to do".

well, that's kind of what fashion is. I mean, it's imbricated with all kinds of fucked-up-edness. I can't help being obsessed with it nevertheless.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

Also, can people please not confuse Lauren with me, here? She is, of course, a treat but we are different people.

Re linen pants: READ, PLS. I said they COULD be white but that there were lots of other serviceable colors that would wear better.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:52 (nineteen years ago)

Laurel -- point taken, though what I really mean is "post a picture of a man wearing a complete outfit, including shorts, that looks good". Which may not be a reasonable request...

(...but it'd be a fuck of a lot better than "No shorts, ever, whatever you do it'll be WRONG WRONG WRONG unless your girlfriend picks it out for you MEN R SO DUMM KTHXBYE".)

xpost I picked white because of sunlight/reflection; I've seen dark colors I liked, but the tannish ones I've seen looked kind of weird, or at least "not me".

horseshoe: If the worthwhile stuff can be extricated from the fucked-up-ness, I think most men are receptive. Maybe it's the difference between looking good and looking trendy -- the former's great, but there are too many other important things in life to worry about the latter, not to mention the cost.

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

red wine, spaghetti sauce, lizard semen

All at once?

= PARTY

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:57 (nineteen years ago)

...in the REPTILE house.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 14:57 (nineteen years ago)

is part of the anti shorts thing a bit Euro-centric?

fyi pleats in dress pants are perfectly acceptable when they are flattering; heavier people don't look good in low rises or flat front pants. Same goes for double breasted suits. In general, you should begin with clothes that flatter your figure and work fashion in as a secondary measure. kind of what lurker said about looking trendy vs. looking good. when you are younger, you can pull of trendy much easier than when you get older. I have some suburban mom friends who raid their high school daughter's wardrobes and it's pretty sad. men have it easier, I think, in sartorial concerns.

don weiner (don weiner), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.woodycreekstore.com/images/hst.jpg

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:06 (nineteen years ago)

I think this is the perfect hot weather compromise

http://www.patriciasmith.co.uk/spring06/babies/pl/navy_linen_shorts_straps250.jpg

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:09 (nineteen years ago)

I dunno, I've heard that before about pleats on bigger men, but I have to respectfully submit that I think it's BS. Flat front trousers that FIT will always look better, whereas pleats just add bulk and c'mon -- no one really needs that much ease below the waist, anyway. Why add fabric where it's not DOING anything?

But of course it's true that wearing clothing too small is never a good thing.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:09 (nineteen years ago)

Teva's are absolutely disgusting, on men and women.
I feel like yr all finding shorts guilty by association.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:10 (nineteen years ago)

Also, double-breasted suits are impossible to sit down in. They are not for meetings. Or dinner. I'm not sure what they're FOR, actually.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:11 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, I just thought of one advantage of pleated pants: you can load your pockets up with enough stuff to stock an electronics store and no one can tell it's there. Whether this is a GOOD thing is debateable.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

Sorry about the misused apostrophe, i also find those disgusting.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:13 (nineteen years ago)

HST knows whats up

sunny successor (katharine), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:13 (nineteen years ago)

Tevas are for canoeing.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:14 (nineteen years ago)

Also, can people please not confuse Lauren with me, here?

ha, apologies to you both.

pleats maybe do help obscure bulging waists. not as well as flowing robes, though. fat sheiks look way better than fat american bank managers.

by tevas do you mean "all sandals," or just sport-style sandals?

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:17 (nineteen years ago)

i agree with Ronan that jeans or summer-weight trousers are just not that hot. it's cotton, people! it breathes!

here's what pleat-dudes need: all-cotton "Chi Pants" - with an entire extra PANEL sewn into the crotch. unfortunately the internets say they have gone out of business. however there are similar design available from.. get ready... the "gusset jeans company"

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)

I dont know where your from but when it was 95 degrees in chicago saturday my jeans were def not 'breathing'

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:24 (nineteen years ago)

TMI

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:24 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, seriously!

I mean, if you're in an overcooled office from 8:30 - 5:00 p.m., and as you step out into the early evening heat you think to yourself "Ah, what a refreshing change!" for the five minutes you spend outside before retreating to some other air-conditioned place...then yeah, maybe your jeans'll breathe.

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:28 (nineteen years ago)

Because at a certain point one gets irritated with the fact that everyone else's insecurities get turned into dogma.

but you know y'all will gladly participate in other forms of dogma that are just fashion after all (e.g. balding men should shave head not comb over). i actually dont agree with the anti short but it often looks bad and, as some genius upthread said, is psychologically lazy.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:30 (nineteen years ago)

i'm astonished that just after our insane heatwave there are people in the uk who are still all like "jeans are ok in the heat" - they are NOT.

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:31 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.webbikeworld.com/motorcycle-jeans/gusset.jpg

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:32 (nineteen years ago)

i mean, i think shorts very rarely look good (though they can, depending), but there are times when function has to take precedence over form. i don't find them nearly as offensive as sandals!

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

Shorts look bad if they're sized wrong or have some garish pattern whatever but as long as you wear shorter socks and not sandals they should look fine. Assuming you have normal legs.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.yellowratbastard.com/images/prod/yrblu6582.jpg

these are also "gussetted"

gah that word is like seriously my bete noir

it's comfy though

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)

e.g. balding men should shave head not comb over

Oh heavens no, Jed. They should just cut their heads off. (A bit extreme, but I'll feel better.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)

As anybody who's actually met me knows, I have a penchant for occasionally being overdressed. I have essentially worn 'adult' clothes since the age of about 16 or 17, having had no desire whatsoever to be associated with my peers, my generation or any other of the accidental or arbitrary subsets that so tyrannize an individual. I dress to please myself and I have very specific criteria that may or may not be evident to others, but I can't imagine judging other people in anything more than the most superficial way based on their sartorial appearance. Some people dress better than others and some try harder and some have better taste and some don't care at all and they're all part of the panoply of human existence. For example, I hate Tevas, and wouldn't wear be caught dead in them but I have friends who wear them because they find them comfortable and as long as they don't try to convert me to their cause, I won't point out that they're conceivably one of the least sexy styles of footwear available but I can't imagine foregoing the pleasure of someone's company just because I don't share their taste in everything.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:40 (nineteen years ago)

it is cooler to do that, Ned.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)

i was waiting for M. White to come along :))))

jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:44 (nineteen years ago)

Hehe, same here. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:45 (nineteen years ago)

M White, were you adopting a fake english accent and banging your mom too?

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Monday, 31 July 2006 15:48 (nineteen years ago)

I only 'adopt' fake accents for the purposes of humor, unless you consider my accents when speaking foreign tongues 'fake' somehow too. I'm ever curious as to what happened to so make you so scornful of people who 'adopted' fake English accents. In my experience, they were usually badly done and elicited more pity than anything else.

Sorry to disappoint, but I haven't banged any moms, not to mention my own.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 31 July 2006 16:37 (nineteen years ago)

i like rjgs green jacket, pictured above

its bad enough that summer leads to compromises like no jackets and hats (no hat!), never mind those awful long short things. people, if you are going to wear shorts, at least wear shorts, dont play at it

-- (688), Monday, 31 July 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

The no-shorts thing is way weird, who the fuck doesnt wear shorts? Someone in 100+ degree heat wearing long pants is a fashion disaster.

India is rather hot and you don't see many shorts there. Plus long pants protect whiteys from skin cancer.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

Linen pants would breathe a lot better than most shorts, I would think, esp. denim ones. But I can't really hate on the shorts wearers, given the horrible weather conditions we've been having. I don't think it's a great look, but to each his own.

GILLY'S BAGG'EAR VANCE OF COUPARI (Ex Leon), Monday, 31 July 2006 17:07 (nineteen years ago)

Plus long pants protect whiteys from skin cancer

I donno, unless I'm sunbathing or swimming my legs don't really get much sun in shorts so that hasnt really been an issue.

I donno I prefer pants to shorts and I only have 2 pairs, but I don't think they look bad on me and most people I know look fine in them too. Girls in short shorts can be one of the hottest things too.

They aren't always flattering but this is the only place I've ever seen them get so much visceral hate. There are plenty of other, much worse fashion crimes out there.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 17:21 (nineteen years ago)

SHORTS SHOULD BE MANDATORY ALL THE TIME, EVEN AT WEDDINGS

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

The other day I was at the grocery store and this girl was wearing a pair of those short-shorts with something written across the butt and the thing written across the butt was "BUTT". Oh man the roffling.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

M White: haha, sorry I was making a joke about Ian Reise-Morraine at your expense!


unless you consider my accents when speaking foreign tongues 'fake' somehow too.

I speak Spanish with a strong castillian accept and my (thusfar unfounded) fear of offending people in the New World has kepy my spanish usage to a minimum. Not sure if this is really as bad as my Colombian teacher made it out to be. :(

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

x-post -- "So let me get this straight...you want a tattoo of a butt with a butt tattooed on it tattooed on your butt?"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

The heat index today is 103°F
I am wearing shorts and my bowlegs are showing
My wife loves my bowlegs
So there

Luis Skank Bloc Polonia (Andy_K), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)

90% of men have no idea how to dress which results in them pairing the said hideous khaki pleated front shorts with, like, a band t-shirt, white socks and tevas for some ungodly reason. None of it goes together or looks remotely ok.

roffle roffle roffle

There are three s in my office today who are doing this.

Have we talked about Crocs yet?

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

GOD I FUCKING HATE CROCS.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

Apparently they are popular because they are vegan-friendly. Why vegan-friendly = fucking hideous, I do not know.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

I said this about them elsewhere:

Allegedly Crocs are mad comfortable, like blowjob-for-your-feet comfortable, but why does that blowjob have to come from a snaggletoothed harpy with cold sores and eczema?

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

vegan-friendly = fucking hideous

No Day-glo.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)

All vegan-friendly shoes are hideous. That has a lot to do with why I am not vegan.

Luis Skank Bloc Polonia (Andy_K), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:23 (nineteen years ago)

And then they have the indecency to come in 8 billion colors, as if making them bright pink will somehow make them more appealing.

God I want to set a torch to the next person wearing them, but just to their feet, so their hideous crocs melt to them.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:23 (nineteen years ago)

Crocs are for gardening or working in a pizza kitchen.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:26 (nineteen years ago)

Or for giving your feet blowjobs, apparently.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

Or, like, canoeing. Or the beach. Actually anything water-related would be good in them.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

And that's an XP, I'm happy to say.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)

But people wear them on a daily basis and I mean that is basically the equivalent of wearing water shoes every day. Which, speaking of which, were the pinnacle of water footwear so I do not see why we needed new plastic substitutes.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

they're also kind of cute on kids. but otherwise, gross.

horseshoe (horseshoe), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:32 (nineteen years ago)

I can't decide if I think Crocs or WATER SOCKS are goofier looking.

haha xpost

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

NO wait they were called AQUA SOCKS.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.justgear.com/summer/products/images/4141G__pop.jpg

VS.

http://www.zappos.com/images/999/7160999/1733-135375-d.jpg

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:37 (nineteen years ago)

Wait a minute--DO MEN WEAR CROCS?

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:37 (nineteen years ago)

90% of men have no idea how to dress which results in them pairing the said hideous khaki pleated front shorts with, like, a band t-shirt, white socks and tevas for some ungodly reason. None of it goes together or looks remotely ok.

most of the men/boys I see wearing shorts are in Abercrombie-beachwear uniform (not unproblematic of course but that's another thread) or preppie golf-course uniform and look a lot better to me than the dude in nondescript-indie-pants, alt-trainers-of-subcultural-origin and no-logo-t-shirt/decidedly-unpreppy-button-down. but perhaps the exemplars of the 'hideous' aesthetic could care less what people think of how they look? maybe they are more concerned with things like ferrying their kids around, doing grocery-shopping, getting work done, etc?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:38 (nineteen years ago)

OH GOD AQUA FUCKING SOCKS

Machibuse '80 (ex machina), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:38 (nineteen years ago)

Wait a minute--DO MEN WEAR CROCS?

The only person I know who owns a pair is a guy!

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:39 (nineteen years ago)

THAT IS NOT OKAY.

Does everyone remember how the little sole part of your aqua sock would always come out?

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:40 (nineteen years ago)

For pete's sake, I SAID that already, gabb! And this is perhaps not the most applicable thread for those people, obviously!

Possibly harder to interpret in the suburbs when you have to drive to big box stores all day running errands with three kids in tow? I mean, I'm not unsympathetic. But then, people in those kinds of situations don't give a shit whether ILX likes their shorts anyway, they've got other things to worry about.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)

Jesus why are we bitching about MEN IN SHORTS when there is the more pressing crisis of MEN IN CROCS??

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)

But I like indie pants and trainers on boys! At least it's pop-culturally current and doesn't remind me of my dad in the slightest. Whence the animosity? OTOH, I hate Abercrombie beachwear and high school/college boys who wear it; as one of my brothers once pointed out, "Some of them are named Kevin, some of them are named Scott, some of them are named Kevin-Scott." But we're a bunch of black-hearted townies, like I said. Don't even get me started on Sperry Topsiders.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)

crocs are the best shoes evah. but I can't speak for mens wearing them.

Ms. Misery TX (MissMiseryTX), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)

i hate Abercrombie and those who wear it, but i like the aesthetic it shares with (rips off from) similar companies.

perhaps we are close to admitting here that we are not speaking of objective fashion rules, but a particular aesthetic (or, should we say, anti-aesthetic)?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)

Er, I don't know if that point was ever in contention, Gabb!

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)

I have a pair of Crocs flip-flops, but I'd never wear them out as actual shoes.

milo z (mlp), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

Err, well, I think I've been speaking about aesthetic from the beginning? And in fact encouraging people to develop their own ideas? I even admitted to a soft spot for cut-off cargo pants that are a hundred years old and butter-soft! But for people asking for ADVICE, it's a more conservative take.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:52 (nineteen years ago)

i kinda like this style, not the color so much

http://www.shoes.com/productimages/shoes_is45717.jpg

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 18:57 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, all those boat shoes make me cringe, but I grew up next to a yacht club that we didn't belong to. :D

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)

I'd like those white sneaks on somebody for whom they were a visual non sequitur...someone with obvious tattoos or etc. But it couldn't be taking the aesthetic seriously, would have to fuck with something.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:03 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.epath.org/blog/uploaded_images/mister%20rogers-734638.JPG

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:05 (nineteen years ago)

I have had (sorry l.k. and Laurel) at least one pair of white Sperry's in my closet since I was about 15. I live in those in summer and when they get old and messed up, you can use them as river shoes akin to the Aqua Socks shown above.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

Don't even get me started on Sperry Topsiders.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

I know, M, I should get over the boat-shoe thing. They just bring up a certain kind of privilege to me, and it raises my (invisible) hackles.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

yo, sperry's are OG topsiders!! laurel, you should NEVER visit princeton if you hate the sperrys!!!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

Have you ever seen me in Princeton? I didn't think so.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

T/S: bluchers vs. topsiders

Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

I went through a Topsider phase when I was 13!

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:24 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.sperrytopsider.com/images/us/local/products/detail/0195115.JPG

totally muthafuckin' classic -- and only $65!!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)

THOSE WERE MY JAMS (until I actually got a pair of Jams)

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:30 (nineteen years ago)

I love how gabbneb basically just told ILX to get a job.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

I admit I roffled.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

you know you're ghetto
when you best clothes is dress clothes
and dress clothes is paco jeans and jelly slippers, nahmean?

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

Crocs have to be some of the most atrocious footwear I've ever seen. Men or women wearing them should be taken out back and shot.

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

Aw, don't shoot my friend :-(

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

crocs hit the trifecta ... ugly, gay, AND look-as-cheap-as-they-are-shitty.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

1) button down shirts - why do they exist?
2) If we are going to talk about shorts, am I the only girl who HATES HATES HATES the slightly longer than usual panties they try to pass off on us as shorts? Not comfy. :c hahaha but they do look hot! so boys shorts = comfy but not hot, girls panty-shorts = hot but not comfy
3) More confusing than any of this is the new women's "dress shorts" thing. Making 30 year old women look even more like crazed, retarded versions of Jodie Foster in Taxi Driver, a never-ending quest, a story by H&M. these are hot too!
4) shorts are difficult. the hloy grail of shorts exists but is difficult to find.
5) girls also wear strange items that cannot look hot in any circumstance - evidence - those weird shiny black leggings/tights things that finish above the ankle eg
http://ec3.images-amazon.com/images/P/B000E8CQKU.01-A3BHU1UEUYDJ19._SS400_SCLZZZZZZZ_V63268377_.jpg
girls: dont make yr legs, no matter how shapely, into weird black shiny sausages...especially not when its 32'c!!!
6) prada trainers - why do they exist????

ambrose (ambrose), Monday, 31 July 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

Heh, I don't like the end-at-the-ankle kind so much, true, but I love black leggings/tights on women.

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)

I can never find shorts long enough for me. I want them to right at the bottom of my knee, like all the skateboarding shorts of my youth. Not halfway down the calf, not mid-thigh for the love of Christ.

milo z (mlp), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

I would off my own friends/family if I caught them wearing Crocs, Dan!

ALLAH FROG (Mingus Dew), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

crocs hit the trifecta ... ugly, gay, AND look-as-cheap-as-they-are-shitty.

They are incredibly comfortable and durable. I seriously haven't worn anything else since the first time I tried them on. I don't care if other people think they're ugly b/c to me lots of walking + TX summer = comfort above all else.

Ms. Misery TX (MissMiseryTX), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

1) button down shirts - why do they exist?

????

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)

They are incredibly comfortable and durable. I seriously haven't worn anything else since the first time I tried them on. I don't care if other people think they're ugly b/c to me lots of walking + TX summer = comfort above all else.

fair enough point -- esp. since all of the men posters' justifications for shorts are because they are comfortable.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)

button down shirts are teh great American invention

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

Something I think looks ridiculous that is apparently very popular in girl-land = platform flip-flops.

the doaple gonger (nickalicious), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

anyway, why does this thread seem just like a rehash of THIS thread --> Is anyone else tired of seeing guys with these kinds of shirts? ?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)

Do note that Crocs are being knocked off left and right and the knock-offs I've seen have been made of a really shitty lightweight plastic, not nearly as soft and resilient as the originals. I don't think the real deals are a bad buy at all, strictly value-wise.

Eisbar, it's not a rehash of that AT ALL. We haven't even STARTED on NJ-style guido dressing.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:11 (nineteen years ago)

Again, I reiterate: this thread needs positive examples! Post pictures of guys you think look great -- esp. guys who aren't rock stars, guys who aren't super-tall or super-skinny, guys who don't look like they're trying to get into their generation's equivalent of Studio 54...

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)

[meatallyandtom'swedding.jpg]

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)

Well yeah, but you're working on being a rock star, so.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

Guys who aren't good at looking good in clothing won't be on the interweb in very stylish outfits, ie any pictures provided will probably involve models. Unless someone has time to fish through a massive flickr search, which I don't.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4686/1648/1600/Retro-Shorts.jpg

La Monte (La Monte), Monday, 31 July 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)


"if they go below the knee, why not just wear pants? do shins get that hot?

-- lauren (warmleatherett...), August 1st, 2006."

See? Now that's what I call a good question.

dr lulu (dr lulu), Monday, 31 July 2006 21:21 (nineteen years ago)

Oh come on surely it doesn't have to be explained that if pants go all the way down to the shoe there's going to be less air circulation than if they cut off above the knee.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

below the knee, rather.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 21:26 (nineteen years ago)

button-down shirts are ugly and stupid

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 21:53 (nineteen years ago)

No they aren't! wtf

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 21:58 (nineteen years ago)

is RJG trying to be funny here?!?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 31 July 2006 21:58 (nineteen years ago)

button-down shirts are ugly and stupid

I think if people are gonna say stuff like this we need some evidence of their personal fashion sense.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 21:59 (nineteen years ago)

I also realize this is why both of my brothers freaked the fuck out when they had to go shopping for their first suits -- one of them actually broke into a cold sweat and had to leave the store because of the pressure of his own idea of adulthood; I suspect he didn't have any mental models for being self-sufficient without "selling out". The Midwest is a weird place sometimes.

I'm confused as to why you think this is a "Midwest" thing.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:02 (nineteen years ago)

RJG OTM

jed_ (jed), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:02 (nineteen years ago)

Unless you're a rent boy, Greek, or a 17 year old trying to get into a nightclub, there's no excuse to wear a shirt outside of a formal setting.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

what's the point of a button-down shirt?

more buttons?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

I think if people are gonna say stuff like this we need some evidence of their personal fashion sense.

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a157/RJG123/3.jpg

lurker #2421, inc. (lurker-2421), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

"Button-down shirt" means "shirt with button-down collar", yes?

If so, then yeah, they're pretty ugly. I kind of think of them together with chinos and other Mr Square clothing items. I kind of think of them as quite American too.

Unless you're a rent boy, Greek, or a 17 year old trying to get into a nightclub, there's no excuse to wear a shirt outside of a formal setting.

This however, is rubbish.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:16 (nineteen years ago)

I want someone to post a picture of someone looking cool wearing a shirt with a button-down collar.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)

wouldn't like to see dom not wearing a shirt

crosspost

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:18 (nineteen years ago)

OTOH, I hate Abercrombie beachwear and high school/college boys who wear it

But all those boys are hot.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)

I dunno, JMZ, but there IS something about how much it was connected to a piece of clothing, namely, a suit. Because the only model he had for suit-wearing was, like, our DAD. And you don't want to be your dad when you're 23 and all malcontented and idealistic an' shit!

Yes, nonsense -- one can ALWAYS wear a sport shirt, if it's a good one and it fits. The same is not true of a DRESS shirt, that's true (difference explained above by Yours Truly).

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)

This however, is rubbish.

-- Alba (albab...), July 31st, 2006. (Alba) (later)

Name a good time to wear a shirt with no jacket other than work or wedding receptions.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)

They are NOT hot. First of all they're too young for me, a disgusting amount too young. Second, the implications of slack-jawed conformity that come with it are just...also not hot.

Dom, WHAT? With cords or other non-suit trousers, under a V-neck sweater, unbuttoned over a T-shirt when you're running to the deli, on a date, to drinks with the dudes. In short, DAILY LIFE.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha but they do look hot! so boys shorts = comfy but not hot, girls panty-shorts = hot but not comfy

This post is potentially confusing, because aren't the girl ones actually called boyshorts?

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

You didn't say with no jacket, but anyway. This is silly. I often go out wearing a shirt to err... pretty much anywhere. I might have a jacket on and then I might TAKE IT OFF!

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

PS. Your classic button-down man:

http://www.amsoil.com/storefront/images/button_down_shirt_large.jpg

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

I want someone to post a picture of someone looking cool wearing a shirt with a button-down collar.
-- Alba (albab...), July 31st, 2006 6:17 PM.

http://students.goucher.edu/growl/images/jayz.jpg

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

Seriously you've got to be kidding me.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:25 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think that collar buttons, deej...?

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)

They are NOT hot. First of all they're too young for me, a disgusting amount too young. Second, the implications of slack-jawed conformity that come with it are just...also not hot.

Yeah, both of those things are hot to me. :D

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:27 (nineteen years ago)

That's not bad. But it's more button-ACROSS. Usually button-down collars go down in a nasty pointy foldy way. But yeah, that's OK, though it doesn't actually *need* the button.

A picture of me wearing a shirt on the occasion of sitting in my old bedroom:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v417/albaalba/ilx/DSCF0140.jpg


I feel like I'm shot by both sides.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think that collar buttons, deej...?

I zoomed in and I think it does.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

OK I'm not quite sure what a button collar shirt is, then.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

Well, yer man in the white one above is sporting one.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

As far as I'm concerned, "button-down shirt" = a shirt that's not a t-shirt. Collars don't come into it.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:30 (nineteen years ago)

no...

button-DOWN

the collar itself buttons down

the tips of the collar have wee buttonholes and there are buttons on the front of the shirt like alba's ideal button-down dude, just up there

shirts w/ buttons, more times, otherwise, are fine

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)

Well this is wear the confusion lies. I think it *is* just supposed to mean with with buttons on the tips of the collars, and I think that's the way most people here are using it.

but·ton-down
PRONUNCIATION: btn-doun
ADJECTIVE: 1. Having the ends of the collar fastened down by buttons: a button-down shirt. 2

http://www.bartleby.com/61/41/B0584100.html

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)

i like those plain canvas boat shoes.

yesterday i wore cut-off dickies because they actually are way breezier and more comfortable than full-length and also because i am hipster scum. so i guess i am pro-shorts.


also: the diff between looking decent in shorts and looking retarded = socks. dudes, if you're wearing tennies or something, just get those super low ankle cut jobbies or else you look like a dweeb with your stupid stocks sticking up over your ankles.

also: i wear "sport sandals" on a semi-regular basis, but that's because i'm doing stuff in the water, like canoeing, or walking in a stream, or floating on an innertube in the mountains with a beer in my hand while you fucks melt in the city.

ps -- my physics professor is here at the coffee shop, and he is wearing tevas, above the knee denim shorts, and a weird patterned golf/polo shirt that i remember chavvy dudes rocking in England 10 years ago with their brittle combed hair and chains and earrings. he couldn't care less.

hippy/redneck mountain towns are the sucking vortex of questionable fashion. At one end you've got fratty Abercrombie asshole dudes, at the other you've got Dead-head, motocross ski bros, and everyone in between dresses like my physics prof.

gbx (skowly), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)

Well this is wear the confusion lies.

What not to where.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:33 (nineteen years ago)

So what do you call a shirt that doesn't button down but still has buttons? A button shirt? A shirt with buttons?

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

I just call it a shirt.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

button-up

I agree w GBX about the socks.

deej.. (deej..), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

it's a "shirt."

xp

gbx (skowly), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)

Alba (and gbx), so is "shirt" by default a shirt with buttons? And you'd say "t-shirt" to distinguish it from a regular shirt-shirt?

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

In some contexts I will use "shirt" to mean T-shirts and sports tops and stuff. I never seem to get that confused in conversation. I suppose I'd say "shirt with buttons" if I really needed to be disambiguate.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

("shirt-shirt" I like)

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

really, john, a shirt with buttons is almost always a collared shirt. so, if i need to distinguish, i'll say that or t-shirt.

gbx (skowly), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)

so are people really wild and all for button-down shirts?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)

I think maybe not.

This week I have bought a stripey T-shirt *and* a new suit for social occasions. Perhaps I will wear the two together to placate jed and Dom.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:44 (nineteen years ago)

You really shouldn't button down a button-down shirt if you're not wearing a tie.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:49 (nineteen years ago)

show me a dude looking better in a t-shirt

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:50 (nineteen years ago)

so you want a shirt w/ holes in its floppy collar are silly wee buttons on the front of it?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:50 (nineteen years ago)

...Maybe?

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:52 (nineteen years ago)

OK

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:52 (nineteen years ago)

A while back there was an article in the New Yorker about the buyer for Sotheby's. He truly seems like someone who dresses well. Like Michael White. Age appropriateness is a factor, but I agree with those who think it shouldn't be what you think of first. It should be apparent in context so that a decision never has to be made.

youn (youn), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:53 (nineteen years ago)

hippy/redneck mountain towns are the sucking vortex of questionable fashion.

I can't emphasize this enough, btw. All the women here are into world music, yoga (which is fine, actually), wear cheez-ball 'ethnic' clothing that they got while backpacking in Thailand or something, and wear endless variations of the prototypical "ski/kayak/bike/wrassle/eat burgers like a girl" t-shirt. Basically, the New Age yuppie girl-power uniform.

I'm constantly baffled by how people can profess to have such a deep appreciation of other cultures or whatever, and then fuck it all up with Kokopelli jewelry and tats like this http://www.tarawa.com/img_prod/20296.jpg

gbx (skowly), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:54 (nineteen years ago)

so you want a shirt w/ holes in its floppy collar are silly wee buttons on the front of it?

SOMEONE DIAGRAM THIS SENTENCE, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD; I WANT TO KNOW WHAT I JUST AGREED WITH

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:54 (nineteen years ago)

i don't get collars with buttons on them (which i've always assumed to = "button-down shirt"). they strike me as utterly pointless. that said, i have one (work) shirt with such a collar, and i like it. but i'd never wear a tie with it. hmm.

mrs fiendish bought me a stripy brown skinny-fit shirt for my birthday (alba: i was wearing it on saturday) which rocks bells, but has - get this! - a button in the BACK of the collar. this seems silly. mind, it also has epaulettes, pockets on the sleeves and a weird (but wonderful) double-button thing going on halfway down it, so it's NOT LIKE OTHER SHIRTS anyway.

mrs fiendish, i admit, has had a huge effect on my fashion sense. especially my shirts. the easily offended (or those who haven't seen "what did you used to look like") should avert their eyes now, or at the very least turn down the brightness.

http://sparky.thehold.net/pix/MeWithShirt1996.JPEG

and to think i wondered why, in 1996, i didn't pull very often.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:58 (nineteen years ago)

(nb: the beard also had a lot to do with it, i think.)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:58 (nineteen years ago)

what I meant was

you want to have a button-down shirt that isn't buttoned down and the floppy wee collar is floppin around w/ holes in and you have a couple of wee buttons on the front of your shirt doin nothin see?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 22:59 (nineteen years ago)

note that brad's suit pants are pleated, fashion-mavens

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:02 (nineteen years ago)

also note ONLY ONE PLEAT. pleats are mostly fine with a suit anyway right?

tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)

most collars do not 'flop' - they stands up on their own or with the aid of buttons or collar stays. the collars of loose-collared shirts can stand up on the shoulder blades rather than hang around the neck. collars can be buttoned with a tie or loosed as the occasion requires. the fact that the unbuttoned collar accentuates the jawline is purely circumstantial, of course.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:11 (nineteen years ago)

'stand'

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

yeah but if they are designed to be buttoned and aren't buttoned?

RJG (RJG), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

'stands' was jaunty, you should have left it in.

estela (estela), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:14 (nineteen years ago)

i know *cries*

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:15 (nineteen years ago)

og og og og og

tremendoid (tremendoid), Monday, 31 July 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)

pleats in trousers are surely making a comeback. i actually think that brad looks not-good in that suit (colour all wrong, fabric too silky).

Button-down shirts are awful. i'm not sure what the button back shirt is for (though i have seen it) probably some kind of throwback to old tailoring like the fact that the bottom buttonhole slit on a good shirt is usually horizontal.

i don't think i've ever seen a man look better in a t-shirt than in a crisp ironed slim one colour shirt. i'm not surprised that dom disagrees with this.

Alba - that was insane about the stripey t shirt - i couldn't think of a better example of a child-like garment.

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

also re brad: the shoulders are too wide. the whole thing makes him look short (maybe he is).

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)

Button-down shirts are awful. i'm not sure what the button back shirt is for (though i have seen it) probably some kind of throwback to old tailoring like the fact that the bottom buttonhole slit on a good shirt is usually horizontal.

actually i'm pretty sure it's a throwback to when collars had to be buttoned on seperately to shirts. i think this was done because the filthmongers of olde fashionde times used to only was the collars.

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)

"wash the collars" damn.

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)

pleats aren't ready to come back yet in menswear. I would give that at least a few years; rises are still going down a tad for mens pants and you can't really have low rises with pleats.

Also, if you aren't wearing collar stays in your points, you are wearing a cheap dress shirt.

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 00:13 (nineteen years ago)

what are crocs?

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 01:21 (nineteen years ago)

mary -- crocs:

http://www.rmconnection.com/images/AllBeechCrocs.jpg

Eisbär (llamasfur), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 01:42 (nineteen years ago)

Cripes.

Stephen X (Stephen X), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 01:56 (nineteen years ago)

JMZ A SHIRT THAT BUTTONS BUT DOES NOT HAVE A BUTTON-DOWN COLLAR IS CALLED A SPORT SHIRT. SEE WAY, WAY ABOVE. Or a "shirt-shirt" which I, too, like.

I have never met gbx but I'm pretty sure I like his style. Also he was the first (only?) person on this thread so far to agree with me, so obviously I'm partial.

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)

at the risk of beating a dead rubber sandal, i'll add that not caring about fashion /= not caring about lookng good. there are pro-shorts people who could care less whether shorts and flipflops (or even god help us tevas in a non-river-running context (though that was why i bought my first of at least two pairs)) are fashionable but nevertheless regard them (and some or many people who wear them) as potentially goodlooking.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 02:39 (nineteen years ago)

i think maybe i wear tevas to sonic youth/yeah yeah yeahs. maybe i can rustle up a dave matthews band shirt before then too.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 02:40 (nineteen years ago)

Alba - that was insane about the stripey t shirt - i couldn't think of a better example of a child-like garment.

What was insane – me buying one?

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 06:17 (nineteen years ago)

my sandals

are actually the second-most expensive shoes i own. i wear them around town. i wear them to work on weekends. they are very comfortable in summertime.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 06:32 (nineteen years ago)

oops. there was supposed to be a sandals picture there...

http://www.shoes.com/productimages/shoes_is78982.jpg

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 06:32 (nineteen years ago)

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0001EYTPC.02._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_V1132239853_.jpg

SHORTS = BAD

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 10:52 (nineteen years ago)

What was insane – me buying one?

no, insane to give stripey t shirt as an example of a child like garment.

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:01 (nineteen years ago)

phew!

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:06 (nineteen years ago)

although really, i suppose it is (even though i own some).

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:09 (nineteen years ago)

I was going to post a picture of me in it to fight my corner, but then I saw the picture and had my doubts.

Funnily enough, the only time anyone has ever told me I was wearing clothes that were too childlike was over 10 years ago. It was my eldest sister and she was referring to a stripey T-shirt that a friend had given me! But that was a more childlike one (with wide, simple, blue and white bands) than the fancier version I bought last week.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:13 (nineteen years ago)

is JMZ a person? i keep on thinking of JME of "Serious!" fame

ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:06 (nineteen years ago)

http://sparky.thehold.net/pix/MeWithShirt1996.JPEG

Welcome to ILX, the late Timothy Claypole!

Earwig oh! (Mark C), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:23 (nineteen years ago)

Tevas were never great river shoes as they exposed your toes way too much for my taste. I certainly lost toenails with them. what I wear now with shorts:


http://www.zappos.com/images/722/7223804/1733-233528-d.jpg

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:38 (nineteen years ago)

keens are also way superior to tevas.

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:39 (nineteen years ago)

you lost toenails?? what were you doing in a river that made you lose toenails?

sunny successor (katharine), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)

That shirt is a menace to society. Wow.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)

JMZ A SHIRT THAT BUTTONS BUT DOES NOT HAVE A BUTTON-DOWN COLLAR IS CALLED A SPORT SHIRT.

A "sport shirt"? Who are you people?

I don't like "shirt-shirt" because I don't like giving buttoned shirts primacy in the shirt world. I am going to suggest "button-up shirt" for those shirts that don't have button-down collars -- partially because, ummm, I've actually heard and maybe even used the term.

JMZ = Laurel's name for me.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:50 (nineteen years ago)

buttoned shirt

shirt with button

shirt

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:53 (nineteen years ago)

let's say you are in Class IIIs and you are an idiot with one leg out of the raft; rocks hurt. or, let's say your foot is on the bottom of said raft, tucked under the tube and along comes a sleeper. ouch. or, if you are just a klutz like me and you just stumble a lot when out and about, you ding up your toes.

then again, when you cross streams or rivers or whatnot, I tend to get sand and shit inside my keens and it always migrates to an uncomfortable position under my foot and I have to remove them and rinse in order to mitigate. that's why I prefer a mesh enclosed river shoe these days. I have hangups with my feet being ABSOLUTELY comfortable when I'm doing outdoor stuff.

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)

don this is exactly why they invented bridges and ferries!

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:17 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, i'm not too keen on wearing tevas/sports-sandals in general but do still own my pair from 1994 but for some reason can't get rid of them, when even for canoeing and other outdoor things i find them too stiff anyway. what we need is something that crosses an aquasock (shudder glaarr) with a teva. and that something would be so anti-fashion as to be the most functional outdoorsy shoe in the universe.

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:29 (nineteen years ago)

You mean... an AQUATEVA?

(Isn't that a brand of water?)

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:31 (nineteen years ago)

haha - nothing quenches like a blend of breatheable latex and rubber!

i am mostly just still surprised we are all not wearing all-over urban armour these days. or suburban armour. or outdoorsy armour. you know. i sincerely await the nanotech fashion revolution.

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:40 (nineteen years ago)

what we need is something that crosses an aquasock (shudder glaarr) with a teva. and that something would be so anti-fashion as to be the most functional outdoorsy shoe in the universe.

http://www.addconsults.com/store/images/crocks.jpg

Ms. Misery TX (MissMiseryTX), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

NOES.

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:53 (nineteen years ago)

though i am kinda moved by your love of crocs! but not moved enough to get some. yes, my size 10 feet would look so awesome and gigantor in plastic holey "shoes," i know. i would get hot pink.

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 13:57 (nineteen years ago)

Since I already admitted it on the NB: I kind of like Crocs. I don't have any, but I might someday.

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

my beach crocs are hot pink. and yes they make my normal sized feet look a bit big. but neutral colors are okay. I have the "aspen" crocs (all closed clog) in black and they are very normal looking.

Ms. Misery TX (MissMiseryTX), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

sorry by "normal" I really mean "average". b/c size 10 feet are by no means freakish or anything.

Ms. Misery TX (MissMiseryTX), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

haha - i'm well-proportioned, i swear!
i am getting crocs one day too but not until i have a garden or beach.

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:11 (nineteen years ago)

Some people look better dressed up and some people look better dressed down, and some people look their very best when wearing trampy old rags.

I am not too fussed about button down shirts or shorts and other things, but the one thing I am always repulsed by is suit jacket and jeans.

Cathy (Cathy), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:15 (nineteen years ago)

although its pretty much superfluous by now to point out that robyn and i are EXACTLY THE SAME, i will say i have 10 feet and would get hot pink too. doppelganger.

sunny successor (katharine), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:16 (nineteen years ago)

also: skirts are way better than shorts. i don't understand why a lot of women don't choose skirts, esp in the city - they are flattering to all figures too, way more so shorts might be. and city life doesn't cause you to sit cross-legged or play rugby too often, which i guess is an argument for shorts.

xpost - haha yes, but sometimes a sport coat with jeans, depending

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:17 (nineteen years ago)

i am sometimes afeared of the SUNNY/RRROBYN BRAIN TWINS WITH SAME SIZE FEET

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

i kinda like crocs, too. but we have established i don't know much about anything.

today i am wearing a dorky powder blue t-shirt with with the name of a "tire and car care center" emblazoned across the chest, because i don't have any other clean clothes. also black jeans with a huge rip in the left pocket, so i have to keep keys and change elsewhere.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 15:06 (nineteen years ago)

you know who is the height of fashion and who probably wears crocs? that QUACKER FACTORY WOMAN, jeanne bice:

http://images-p.qvc.com/is/image/f/68/f0968.001?$proddetailmain$

i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)

NO

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

mandee, your finger is on the pulse!

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

OKAY
SOMEONE GOT INSIDE MY MIND AND I AM TRYING NOT TO BE SCARED
i saw this on shefinds.com, which i randomly check, and just checked now: five fingers for your feet

i want them in CLEAR. with hot pink ribbons. get inside my mind for that now.

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

crocs.. awful!

topsiders are classic though, I want to buy a pair but can't find women's in navy blue anywhere.

anyone else read the sartorialist?

dar1a g (daria g), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)

omg at footy five fingers

gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)

topsiders and shorts! stylin!

dar1a g (daria g), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)

i read the sartorialist now!

(i'm still reeling about those finger shoes. i partly blame the heat wave though.)

rrrobyn sharkattack battleforcenet (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

And to top it all off, in today's Washington Post...

Not Such A Croc
Might a Fad Shoe's Health Claims Stand?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 20:28 (nineteen years ago)

Now he suggests them to people with plantar fasciitis, a painful stretching of the tissue along the bottom of the foot...

Yeah, okay, I'm sold.

Laurel (Laurel), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)

Daria, I just spent way too much time on that site. Um, thanks?

Anyway, here is an acceptable shorts fashion:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4686/1648/1600/slimshorts26.jpg

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)

. . . that Daria already posted. Sorry!

Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 21:13 (nineteen years ago)

it didn't show either time for me

i like the sartorialist! thanks for the link!

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, okay, I'm sold.

Oh snap, me too. Though they really had me at the part about over-pronating/back-pain/etc.

This part, esp:

(Disclosure: Acting on a tip from my best friend, I got my first Crocs last winter. My chronic low-back pain disappeared quickly. I now own two pairs -- as do my daughter, son and normally conservative husband.)

I HAVE CHRONIC LOWER BACK PAIN.

gbx (skowly), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 21:47 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, I probably need something when I pronate through the soles of my (already once-resoled) "vintage" flipflops

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 1 August 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)

I think there's a lot of confusion in the thread re: American terminology vs British terminology and certain statements made by one faction are coming accross as ludicrous to the other side. (e.g. Dom saying you shouldn't wear a shirt outside of work. Do you know how silly that sounds to an American?)

It's Rodney, assume the position! (R. J. Greene), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 02:03 (nineteen years ago)

It sounds silly in Britain too.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 06:41 (nineteen years ago)

but for difft reasons.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 07:10 (nineteen years ago)

i'd like to second the thanks for dar1a's sartorialist link - anyonw who thinks "fashion" is just about being bitchy should give that a look

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 07:24 (nineteen years ago)

It sounds silly in Britain too.

Trust me, it sounds much sillier in America.

It's Rodney, assume the position! (R. J. Greene), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 08:43 (nineteen years ago)

Why?

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

i think a shirt in the US means any sort of "top" eg t shirt, shirt, er... other types of shirt that i cant think of

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 09:46 (nineteen years ago)

Oh.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 09:54 (nineteen years ago)

Plantar fasciitis + high arches + lower back pain = don't come anywhere near me in the morning, so if Crocs can solve any/several of these botherations, my family and friends will be very grateful.

Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 12:13 (nineteen years ago)

i was gonna post something about how one doesn't have to be so moralistic about clothing choices - ie shorts bad. we can consider if like our shirt compliments our pants or if our shorts fit at all - and just delight in the whole process.

but crocs? shit - those are the ugliest motherfuckers ever. i knew they should've been eradicated in boulder before they spread. but i never thought new york would be threatened - it's a plague so much viler than anyone could've imagined.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)

oh and also the cloying cuteness - ugh.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

and how they're five times as big as anyone's feet.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

we can consider if like our shirt compliments our pants

i really don't think you want that to happen

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I wouldn't trust anything a shirt says about pants 'cause it'll still be looking down at them.

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 15:26 (nineteen years ago)

I've been reading this thread thinking "crocs" were crocodile skin shoes.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 2 August 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)

India is rather hot and you don't see many shorts there. Plus long pants protect whiteys from skin cancer.

What about lunghis and dhotis that leave the calves bare?

If a shirt is going to have a collar (and this is only an idea that I am recently coming round to) then the only acceptable collars are those with the little spars to help maintain their shape.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 3 August 2006 08:59 (nineteen years ago)

I think that is ALMOST true

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:01 (nineteen years ago)

(I agree w/ you but there is the occasional exception)

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:01 (nineteen years ago)

Actually the sort o nascent collars of workmen's shirts of the 30s are acceptable too but they are not really collars.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:02 (nineteen years ago)

yeah depends on the shirt. a smart shirt is quite a different beast from a casual shirt.

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:05 (nineteen years ago)

nascent collars?

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:06 (nineteen years ago)

There is no such thing as a casual shirt, or at least there should not be. Smart shirts can be worn somewhat casually, sort of.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:08 (nineteen years ago)

ridiculous.

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, I don't agree w/ that

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:10 (nineteen years ago)

I can't find an image of the sort of collar I am thinking of.

I can't think of a decent looking casual shirt. Prove me wrong.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:16 (nineteen years ago)

frankly, i don't see how "There is no such thing as a casual shirt, or at least there should not be" can be the viewpoint of someone who would wear a bright orange suit to a wedding.


i know the kind of collar you mean - with no upright bit between the body of the shirt and the collar so it looks more like a drawing of a collar a kid would do.

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:18 (nineteen years ago)

I looked sharp, it was cut well and the shirt and tie were genius.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:19 (nineteen years ago)

like a pyjama collar on a smart pair of pyjamas like what cary grant would wear.

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:19 (nineteen years ago)

it's not so much that ed, it's more that one implies a kind of stuffy tailoring tradition "casual shirts should not exist" whereas wearing orange suits kind of suggests the opposite.

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:21 (nineteen years ago)

If I'm going to be casual I'd rather a smart T-shirt than a casual shirt.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:30 (nineteen years ago)

This is just me of course.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 3 August 2006 09:36 (nineteen years ago)

A t-shirt is, by definition, a casual shirt.

Jesus Dan (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 August 2006 10:58 (nineteen years ago)

"a smart T-shirt" ... !!?

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 3 August 2006 11:10 (nineteen years ago)

You know, like smart drinks.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 3 August 2006 11:14 (nineteen years ago)

in my mind i agree with ed basically and see no contradiction, except i wouldnt say it out loud

except...

smart t shirt = t shirt that is clean, not full of holes, doesnt say "beer: helpnig ugly people have sex since 1874" or similar, possbily ironed???

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 3 August 2006 11:23 (nineteen years ago)

I had an eye exam yesterday and the nurse/assistant/whatev was wearing white crocs with her scrubs. :(

I find short-sleeved button up shirts to be something of a horrible crime (moreso when worn in a professional setting).

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Thursday, 3 August 2006 12:08 (nineteen years ago)

i dont know, i love them on high school teachers with a tie, pleated tan shorts and knee high white socks.

sunny successor (katharine), Thursday, 3 August 2006 12:24 (nineteen years ago)

last pro-crocs word from me:

there are other styles than the 'beach' one you see everywhere. Those are meant to be larger and the other styles are more true to size. This is the aspen, which I wear to work most days:

http://www.journeys.com/images/products/1_41347_FS.jpg

just as comfortable as my bright pink beach ones which my boyfriend tried to slip to the dog for destruction.

Ms. Misery TX (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 3 August 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)

I read about Crocs for the first time quite recently, in one of those magazines which fall out of the sunday papers. The columnist was raving about them, saying how comfy they were despite her initial misgivings, but I just kept thinking that a person's feet must get awfully sweaty if they're encased in rubber like that on a hot day.

C J (C J), Thursday, 3 August 2006 12:34 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
rather than derailing the flip-flop thread further, i thought this would be more appropriate here:
http://www.ihatecrocs.com

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Friday, 15 September 2006 18:58 (nineteen years ago)

nine months pass...

i was walking thru humboldt park and saw this otherwise-gangster dude hanging on the corner in ... pink crocs

deej, Friday, 6 July 2007 14:45 (eighteen years ago)

Crocs just look so bad on anyone over the age of ten. They make Ugg boots seem elegant and elevate flip flops to the realms of Jimmy Choo.

Anna, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, crocs and tevas look terrible unless you are wearing them in the actual context of camping and/or boating of some sort.

Why, oh, why are people wearing topsiders again? They weren't cool when I was in high school in the late 80s and they are even less cool now.

Bill in Chicago, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)

Is there some kind of anti-baggy backlash on its way in the hip-hop world? My wife says she's seen a lot of guys in the Bronx wearing tighter pants, bright colors, skater clothes, stuff that looks like it's out of Wild Style etc., and I've seen groups of kids on the Subway dressed like that as well.

Hurting 2, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)

a friend of mine was just telling us about how she wore her five fingers to work today

El Tomboto, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)

Oh my god those are horrible.

Ms Misery, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

yuk

Hurting 2, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)

Is there some kind of anti-baggy backlash on its way in the hip-hop world? My wife says she's seen a lot of guys in the Bronx wearing tighter pants, bright colors, skater clothes, stuff that looks like it's out of Wild Style etc., and I've seen groups of kids on the Subway dressed like that as well.

-- Hurting 2, Friday, July 6, 2007 3:19 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

PARTY LIKE A ROCKSTAR

i think it looks terrible

deej, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)

ban tombot's friend

deej, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)

Those footie things are so grotesque that I come all the way back round to liking them for sheer chutzpah. You must get awesome grip from having 5 separate toes working.

Laurel, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

a friend? you are very forgiving.

nathalie, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

I don't know, I thought the XXXL all dark colors look was getting a bit tired. It's kind of refreshing to see some crazy styles coming back. (xpost)

Hurting 2, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

or should I say XXXPost

Hurting 2, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

http://nymag.com/fashion/lookbook/lookbook060918_330.jpg

Hurting 2, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

Eeeee! They make feet looked as though they have been dipped in some sort of alien tar, which will spread up the body and eventually suffocate the host organism.

Anna, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

The five-finger things that is.

Anna, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

they had a special on E on outrageously expensive things. i knew that sneakers could be high priced, but in the 1000s???? wtf man.

nathalie, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

re: the hip hop kids with bright colors & rock style, i've seen it in dc to some extent.. saw a trio of super stylish kids at american apparel store with 80's brights, funky glasses and asymmetrical hair. their jeans and sneakers were obv very, very expensive

daria-g, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:30 (eighteen years ago)

Definitely due in part to Skateboard P., Lupe Fiasco, etc.

Hurting 2, Friday, 6 July 2007 15:32 (eighteen years ago)

I will dress like I'm 15 forever and ever.

billstevejim, Friday, 6 July 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)

My wife says she's seen a lot of guys in the Bronx wearing tighter pants, bright colors, skater clothes, stuff that looks like it's out of Wild Style etc., and I've seen groups of kids on the Subway dressed like that as well.

-- Hurting 2, Friday, July 6, 2007 11:19 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

yea go to broadway + spring st in the afternoon, you'll see this everywhere

sleep, Friday, 6 July 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

today i am wearing a wu tang shirt with a brown cardigan, b&w camo shorts, stripey b&w socks and le coqs. i have been ridiculed by 3 girls.

chaki, Friday, 6 July 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

I would be totally down with the new skatery hip-hop fashions, except for the fact that NYC hip-hop fashions seem to spread directly to wealthy middle-aged women, and I would like to avoid seeing wealthy middle-aged women dressed up like late-80s middle-school wavers

nabisco, Friday, 6 July 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

because I would be too turned on.

nabisco, Friday, 6 July 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

Tuomas!
Tuomas!?
Got any new unbaggy jeans in the meantime?

t**t, Friday, 6 July 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)

t-shirts and ancient levi's 'til I die.

except when I'm at work. and sometimes even then.

will, Friday, 6 July 2007 19:44 (eighteen years ago)

True or False: The reasons men struggle with upgrading to decent "adult" clothing have less to do with fashion knowledge and more to do with decent "adult" clothing requiring care and maintenance (including but not limited to ironing, proper folding/hanging, dry cleaning, not getting food on them, and not ripping them)

nabisco, Friday, 6 July 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)

T--also i think expense has something to do w/ it; ive avoided "adult" clothes cause they cost money.

i finally got rid of most of my gym socks this summer tho and have been wearing proper adult non-white socks. it makes me feel way more complete.

max, Friday, 6 July 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

xxpost. . .uh I think this is true for me as well.

Ms Misery, Friday, 6 July 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)

in my case it's due to having worn the exact same 25 pieces of clothing since i was 22 and shopping being a more soul crushing experience than listening to your dad cry

gff, Friday, 6 July 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)

Part of what helped me with this was a few years of crushing grad-school poverty, during which I couldn't afford any new clothes at all -- by the end of it, just about everything I owned was threadbare, worn out, ripped, stained, and generally crappy. By the time I got back to a proper full-time job, I was just dying to blow my first few paychecks on some good-lucking clothes.

Re: crying parents, here's the sad coda to that: a couple months ago, my mom was in town, and I actually went through the trouble of having my good clothes dry-cleaned and pressed and whatnot, and she STILL says to me, "so you still kind of dress like a teenager." This after two days of wearing DKNY trousers and Italian shoes and roll-top wool cardigans, on the one afternoon where I put on nice jeans, nice sneakers, and a ridiculously expensive sweater. There is apparently an alive-and-well mentality where if you're not wearing a suit or tucking your shirt into dress slacks, you're still a child.

nabisco, Friday, 6 July 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)

i've improved recently; i've started sorting my laundry into "knits" and "weaves" to avoid rough treatment of fabrics. remember, the most damage to your clothes happens during washing!

elmo argonaut, Friday, 6 July 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

i have got to stop shopping at forever 21 and other stores with clothes designed for pre-teens. i have got to, seriously. i am totally ready to start dressing like an adult. but damn, real clothes are so expensive!

homosexual II, Friday, 6 July 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

also, when will i get over stripes? i have ONLY STRIPED SHIRTS! its ridiculous! i probably look like i'm trying to be french or something.

homosexual II, Friday, 6 July 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

Stripes are ending big-time, I think. I keep seeing stores carrying these faded stripey shirts, so you can look like either (a) "yeah, it's a striped shirt, but it's old, I got it in 2002," or (b) "yeah, we're still doing stripes, but note how we're fading them out?"

nabisco, Friday, 6 July 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

only acceptable stripes are seersucker

deej, Friday, 6 July 2007 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

wait are we talking about large horizontal stripes, like a rugby shirt or something, or thin vertical stripes on a dress shirt, or some third thing that I'm unaware of because I'm FASHION-RETARDED (currently wearing a grey adidas t-shirt that I've had since middle school and a pair of green nautica shorts that I bought fairly recently when I realized that none of my old nautica shorts fit me) (in my defense I am 19 and unemployed and only get dressed in order to drive my sister to and from the summer camp where she works)

bernard snowy, Friday, 6 July 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

AND I WEAR TEVAS WHILE DOING SO

bernard snowy, Friday, 6 July 2007 21:59 (eighteen years ago)

We're talking about medium horizontal stripes, which have been rather popular over the past half-decade or so:

http://www.getsigned.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/AD18262WH_med.jpg

nabisco, Friday, 6 July 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)

If you keep wearing anything it will eventually come back into fashion, though you might not, especially if you neglect to wash it for all those years.

Michael White, Friday, 6 July 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

o i was talking about vertical stripes

deej, Friday, 6 July 2007 22:13 (eighteen years ago)

u HIPSTERS and your sailor shirts

deej, Friday, 6 July 2007 22:13 (eighteen years ago)

jk

deej, Friday, 6 July 2007 22:13 (eighteen years ago)

i am guiltily wearing a red and white striped top right now.
i am really ready to get over stripes. really, really ready. i think my eye is just drawn to stripes in stores full of ugly, bland, cheap clothes and i buy them just to get the whole painful process over with.

homosexual II, Friday, 6 July 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

stripes are classic, what's wrong with them? i don't wear a lot but i have a great long striped cardigan from the club monaco & was looking for some striped t-shirts because.. jean seberg wears stripes in breathless and they're super chic

the answer is not to go to stores with ugly bland cheap clothes :)

daria-g, Saturday, 7 July 2007 03:41 (eighteen years ago)

I stopped wearing shorts when i was eight

Heave Ho, Saturday, 7 July 2007 05:09 (eighteen years ago)

I will never eschew my stripey tops! I love my black and red/black and white tight stripey longsleeves. Esp under a tshirt, or a cute black pinafore dress.

Also, stripey tights and chunky maryjanes or Docs.

And Chuck taylors. And jeans. And yes, goth clothes.

I'm 36. Fuck it, I dont care. I dont look it so stuff it!

Trayce, Saturday, 7 July 2007 06:51 (eighteen years ago)

I think "What Not to Wear" shows what Adult Female Clothes look like. And the style is largely nice. Unfortunately, it also shows that to upgrade to such will cost 5k. So...I think I will be stuck wearing what I have now: 5 skirts, 3 trousers, one nice pair of jeans I never wear, 2 dresses, 3 silly blouses, and enough T-shirts to clothe a large army of refugee children.

Abbott, Sunday, 8 July 2007 01:26 (eighteen years ago)

They never help men on that show, which makes me off.

Abbott, Sunday, 8 July 2007 01:27 (eighteen years ago)

I hate all cargo pants/shorts/etc. and wish all would quit wearing them. Especially shorts on the very skinny whereupon they look like saddlebags. Pleats are okay, I don't see why people are wrong with them if they are not too egregiously flappy and are worn in a size that actually fits.

Abbott, Sunday, 8 July 2007 01:34 (eighteen years ago)

It's funny that this thread got revived. Just the other day I was about to go shopping for some new stuff and I had a crisis about whether I was going to be buying faded jeans, band t-shirts & new Chucks or if I needed to go for dark jeans, button ups & some workboots or something.

I haven't gone shopping yet.

Also I have not worn shorts except around my house since 8th grade. No one understands why I refuse to wear them out.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 8 July 2007 01:38 (eighteen years ago)

I grew up Mormon & my mom would basically not allow me to wear shorts or tank tops or skirts (unless w/tights) so I have grown very acclimated to wearing pants in hot weather. I feel very uncomfortable in shorts, though quite fine w/the rest of course.

Abbott, Sunday, 8 July 2007 01:41 (eighteen years ago)

I went through a three- or four-year-long phase of refusing to wear shorts for no apparent reason, but I got over it last month when I suddenly remember that north carolina is HOT AS BALLZ. it was either shorts, or overalls with nothing under them

bernard snowy, Sunday, 8 July 2007 02:07 (eighteen years ago)

"overalls with nothing under them"

how very north carolina

/never been, may be confusing it with like backwoods virginia in which case i apologize

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 8 July 2007 03:43 (eighteen years ago)

I just made the awful mistake of trying to buy some *adult* clothes at Century 21. WTF is up with the parallel universe mens clothing they sell there? How can I know I'm getting a good price when I've never fucking heard of the designer?

Hurting 2, Sunday, 8 July 2007 03:47 (eighteen years ago)

i saw hip hop dude wearing brand new crass t-shirt XD

am0n, Sunday, 8 July 2007 03:49 (eighteen years ago)

GREAT, A PAIR OF 28" WAIST 36" INSEAM JEANS WITH A PHOTOGRAPH OF A DANDELION SEWED ONTO THE ASS - ONLY $115

Hurting 2, Sunday, 8 July 2007 03:52 (eighteen years ago)

AND LOOK, IT'S...FARACHI

Hurting 2, Sunday, 8 July 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

sorry just needed to vent

Hurting 2, Sunday, 8 July 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

i get the impression my napalm death shirt doesn't have the same effect. xxxpost

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 8 July 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

ur no hip hop dude. ive seen ur pic

am0n, Sunday, 8 July 2007 04:05 (eighteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v71/punkychicken/bush.jpg

am0n, Sunday, 8 July 2007 04:05 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.freshtrend.com/images/dopies.jpg

sleep, Sunday, 8 July 2007 05:41 (eighteen years ago)

ur no hip hop dude. ive seen ur pic

-- am0n, Sunday, July 8, 2007 4:05 AM

tru dat ;_;

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 8 July 2007 06:56 (eighteen years ago)

How many clothes do you think a guy needs to own? I went on holiday for two weeks and took about six pairs of trousers, seven shirts, ten or so t-shirts and four pairs of shoes. It was hot and I was lying around in shorts much of the time, but we went out every evening and I never got close to wearing even half of what I brought. And that's only a fraction of what I actually own.

Time for a clear-out? Or should I just change my outfits more?

Ismael Klata, Sunday, 8 July 2007 12:01 (eighteen years ago)

where is pic of big hoos i need to laugh

cutty, Sunday, 8 July 2007 12:41 (eighteen years ago)

was it ever determined whether busch is wearing a utilikilt in that pic

am0n, Sunday, 8 July 2007 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

xpost
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/3238/hardoutherecd7.jpg

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 8 July 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)

i have lost all my style.

teeny, Sunday, 8 July 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)

Can people post photos of young "adult" style that they like (other than suits, which aren't that hard to figure out) - like work-appropriate non-formal style, going out style, etc.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 8 July 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

wau @ the video on utilikilts.com!! xpxpxppxpopsta

sleep, Sunday, 8 July 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

Basically, I'd just take 100 bucks to Uniqlo and call it a day. Gotta have good sneakers though.

django, Sunday, 8 July 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

Gah them abominable sk8 shoes sleep posted are just a storming brew of FOOT TENDONITIS!

Abbott, Sunday, 8 July 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

Hurting, a lot of these are kind of a tangent to your actual question, maybe more fashiony and casual than you want -- but here's a cut-and-paste of stuff stuff, just from a 10-minute run through some style blogs (mostly Sartorialist):

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4686/1648/400/TRVF.jpg
http://z.about.com/d/mensfashion/1/5/M/6/00060m.jpg
http://z.about.com/d/mensfashion/1/5/b/6/00230m.jpg

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

Aww crap, I lost like a dozen links in there! One sec---

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

-- and crap, they don't show up in the page source, either. Sorry, ILX hates men's fashion.

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)

I am more or less rocking those looks these days, nabisco. well, more the first pic than the second or third. but yeah, to tuomas: i figure as long as you're dressing in a way that A) is good enough for the job you have, and B) good enough for the job you WANT to have, then you're probably okay! hence why A&R types can wear jeans until they're 60, etc.

Will M., Monday, 9 July 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)

There was a much wider variety of styles in the 8 million pictures that followed, now lost somewhere in the belly of ILX -- it was supposed to start with basics and then get more interesting. I have no idea how it got eaten!

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

weird! you should jsut jack all the pics and put them in a flickr or an imageshack or something. much easier than hotlinking a bunch of things, then losing them...

Will M., Monday, 9 July 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

In any case, as much trouble as I have actually following this advice, I think all of the following should help:

1. Buy trousers. Not jeans or shapeless khakis, but well-cut trousers, altered to break right. (Even if it costs a little more, or they're dry-clean only, or need frequent ironing, or whatever.)

2. Know your shirt size and do not be afraid of the packaged men's dress shirts, which are actually fairly cheap. (Even if they require frequent washing and ironing.)

3. Don't just buy things that are basic and sturdy and all-purpose. Get used to the idea of buying things you can't necessarily wear all the time: seasonal clothes, interesting colors you'll only need once in a while, a range of formal/casual, etc. (It's not like you're growing -- you can keep a large wardrobe for a while.)

4. Bother with the smaller details -- keep decent v-neck undershirts, buy nice socks with different colors to match to your clothes, etc. A little accessorizing does not automatically make you a woman. (Neither does having an actual selection of different shoes for different clothes and occasions.)

5. Buy stuff that has shape and structure and a tailored look.

6. In addition to looking for more "adult" things in the stores you already shop at, go into the kinds of men's stores you might not usually visit, and look through the casual sections.

7. Be patient about shopping. Your first more-adult purchases might feel incongruous with everything else you own, such that you don't even wear them very often. But if you keep picking up things along these lines, you'll eventually find your jeans and t-shirts harder to work in with what you're wearing.

8. Even if individual items feel weird, inappropriate, or unstylishly old on you, there's every chance they won't when paired with the right other clothes.

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

xpost yeah will the problem is that I didn't copy my post before posting it, so I have no backup or memory of where all those pictures came from -- maybe I'll trawl through again later and re-collect the better ones

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)

9. Try to wear materials that would have been generally recognizable to someone in 1910. Even the same item with finer fabrics/construction = more adult.

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

i never knew nabisco was well dressed male

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 21:48 (eighteen years ago)

Sadly, cutty, I'm not very well dressed. I think I just spend a lot of time sorting out how to become better dressed, investing in it for a really short period of time, and then getting tired and just wearing t-shirts again.

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

jed is very good on this thread.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

I try sometimes to dress like an adult but I am such an odd size and shape and cannot often afford a tailor.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)

I think women have it easier, when it comes to clothes. Other things, not so much maybe.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)

women can go buy a "cheap" article of clothing just to wear one night out. i on the other hand can never find anything other then name brands that fit me. It’s a serious commitment for me to just by a shirt

carne asada, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:13 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder what kind of odd size and shape my adam is

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:15 (eighteen years ago)

short and weird, like a Jewish monkey

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:15 (eighteen years ago)

are monkeys kosher?

carne asada, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

Not this one.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

This is me, wondering why all shirts are so long:
http://smonkey.surveymonkey.com/img/logo_mk.gif

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

guys i sympathize and all but the idea that women have it easier or cheaper wrt clothes is just bonkers

gff, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

guys have it easier if they don't care--any guy can pull off not caring

women not caring is way worse

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:20 (eighteen years ago)

Women have a diverse choice of items from which to choose and now (like the pests they are) they are even colonizing menswear with their "boyshorts" and "boyfriend pants". They simply must be stopped at all costs. We should build a fence.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

On the other hand - yaaaay boyshorts!

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:24 (eighteen years ago)

then i guess my GF just makes it look easy. cuz she's always coming home with stuff you got that was part of some huge "sale" .i never find anything on sale

carne asada, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:24 (eighteen years ago)

My wife is the same way. It's so insidious and disgusting.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)

It's harder to find like actual good-looking "work" clothes for women (or for meeee)...I have no idea what's too trendy, etc. Whereas men can throw on the oxford & trousers and hip hip hooray, no thought required. You could even do grown up garanimals and sew little lions and hippos to make matching all your oxfords/sweaters/socks easier...I have a hard time with the whole thing somehow & I envy men for it.

Abbott, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)

she's like "look i got this pair of pants fo $2" What?

carne asada, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

xp i think you have to spend a lot more time shopping to run into stuff on sale

gff, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

listen guys--if you want to look good i'll take you shopping. bring $2000.

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)

I think I'm gonna just end up like nabisco and come out of grad school looking like a vaudeville hobo minus the 5 o'clock shadow with a satchel full of New Balance 578s bought with money I should've spent on dressy shirts.

Abbott, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:30 (eighteen years ago)

cutty, will you get me the t-shirt with the dog on it? I'm on a whole other coast so there's no way we'd end up wearing it to the same "event".

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:31 (eighteen years ago)

guys i sympathize and all but the idea that women have it easier or cheaper wrt clothes is just bonkers

When I'm at the mall/Target/etc. I always see way more affordable/trendy clothes for women than I do for men.

For dudes, until you step up to the big bucks, you're stuck shopping at the surf & skate shop (or Abercrombie, god forbid) and looking like you're 16, or you're wearing plain/awful Dockers and such.

(depends on your idea of big bucks, though, I suppose)

milo z, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:34 (eighteen years ago)

I came out of grad school looking like a hobo who'd been vaguely fashionable several years ago in a different state, thank you very much.

I think the root men's vs. women's difference is that women are expected to own a wide variety of different clothing, the individual pieces of which aren't worn very often, while men tend to have a smaller number of more durable, often-worn pieces. (Hence lots of women are schooled from the get-go in the Dressing Like an Adult rule of having different options for different situations.) If you have to compare, I would guess that at lower prices it's basically a wash, and that at higher prices it probably works out in men's favor. (With the kind of men's stuff we're talking about here, well ... just lay down a couple hundred each on some key basic things -- good trousers, shoes, jackets -- and you can pair them up with inexpensive middle-priced basics like plain dress shirts and such, and you'll still look like you know what you're doing.)

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

I think the root men's vs. women's difference is that women are expected to own a wide variety of different clothing, the individual pieces of which aren't worn very often, while men tend to have a smaller number of more durable, often-worn pieces.

totally

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:53 (eighteen years ago)

(i didn't want to say nabisco OTM)

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:54 (eighteen years ago)

if you guys could only see what i'm wearing right now

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:54 (eighteen years ago)

Why don't you just...tell us?

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:55 (eighteen years ago)

this is a funny thread

RJG, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:57 (eighteen years ago)

I don't see much to laugh about.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:58 (eighteen years ago)

tretorn/acne collab shoes
trovata shorts
silas t-shirt
eugenia kim hat

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:59 (eighteen years ago)

did you show all messages?

RJG, Monday, 9 July 2007 22:59 (eighteen years ago)

tretorn/acne collab shoes
trovata shorts
silas t-shirt
eugenia kim hat

If I was the sort of person who understood what any of this stuff is, what sort of conclusions what I draw from this?

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:02 (eighteen years ago)

WOULD I draw

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:02 (eighteen years ago)

why did you ask

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:07 (eighteen years ago)

put together an outfit jew monkey

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:09 (eighteen years ago)

Trousers are exactly what I need. How much should I expect to spend minimum on a decent pair (not including alterations)?

Hurting 2, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:11 (eighteen years ago)

you're wearing a hat?

RJG, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:12 (eighteen years ago)

a few things:
1) pants with pleats can look fantastic, there's no reason to diss all of them in one fell swoop.

2) what is wrong with lacoste style golf shirts? they can be so becoming, and at this point, they come in so many fucking crazy colors that it takes a fashion retard not to look good in them. (tho not w/ khakis. khakis give me the howling fantods)

3) linen pants are excellent, and they actually DO last a long time, provided you are relatively careful. if accidents occur...well, a lot of them are white anyway. bleach is your friend.

4) to the men who don't wear shorts, ever: be prepared to have the most disgusting legs when you get older. like seriously.

5) places 2 shop: it is called Loehmann's Department Store and it sells well-made, good-looking designer clothes for much cheaper than you'll ever pay in any other new clothing store. ALL of my pants and some of my shorts are from Loehmann's.

the table is the table, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:12 (eighteen years ago)

you sound like you dress like you are 60

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

I think I have an aversion to things that look expensive, especially stuff that looks like expensive versions of hipster wear.

Hurting 2, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

Also, high fashion needs to cio with their fucking websites.

Hurting 2, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:14 (eighteen years ago)

hipster wear is either vintage clothing or expensive clothing, there is no in between

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:19 (eighteen years ago)

why did you ask

Because I wanted to know!

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:22 (eighteen years ago)

you would conclude that i spend too much on clothes and i look too good

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:23 (eighteen years ago)

fyi cutty, i tend to dress like this guy:
http://spectacle.provocateuse.com/images/spectacles/don_johnson_01.jpg

and if you ever diss the way i dress again, i will find you and rip your disgusting $400 jeans off your ass, fucker.

the table is the table, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:26 (eighteen years ago)

Also I cannot wear these skinny jeans. I have muscular legs. But I don't really like baggy jeans either. It is deeply difficult, but one tries.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:26 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, I do admire you, cutty.

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:27 (eighteen years ago)

NO MY PIC FUCK. anyway, that was Don Johnson.

the table is the table, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:28 (eighteen years ago)

Although posting to ILX in a hat is a bit like making a phone call with gloves on.

xp

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:28 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think I could give you a trouser minimum, Hurting, since it depends on so much stuff -- hell, if you're easy to fit and hit the right designer consignment store, you could have some world-class trousers for cheaper than a pair of Levis. Personally, the couple pairs of really great, stylishly cut, wise-investment trousers I own both came in around $200, from places like APC and DKNY.

nabisco, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:28 (eighteen years ago)

Unfortunately I invested in a good suit for my wedding and then lost a whole bunch of weight since then -- it may be fixable through alterations, but the suit looks awfully baggy on me now.

Hurting 2, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:32 (eighteen years ago)

you'd rip my jeans off? what?

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:35 (eighteen years ago)

do your linen pants have an nice tie string? do you wear tevas with that?

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:36 (eighteen years ago)

you'd rip my jeans off? what?

rofl

admrl, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:38 (eighteen years ago)

;)

cutty, Monday, 9 July 2007 23:48 (eighteen years ago)

do these "wise investment" $200 pants tan my legs? Build up muscle? Do my taxes and bring my wife to climax?

Granny Dainger, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 00:06 (eighteen years ago)

Why, are you having trouble with those things?

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 00:14 (eighteen years ago)

I know, it hurts, but it's really not so crazy to spend as much on a great pair of trousers as you would on, like, a game console. Even if you only manage to wear them 200 times in their entire life with you, that's like getting up in the morning and paying a dollar to look awesome all day.

nabisco, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 00:19 (eighteen years ago)

You are insane, all of you.

Eyeball Kicks, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 00:38 (eighteen years ago)

do your linen pants have an nice tie string? do you wear tevas with that?

No, they have a button and a zipper. One pair even has TWO buttons.

I never wear sandals (or Tevas or whatever you want to call them). It's either shoes or no shoes.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 01:07 (eighteen years ago)

I wore bible-ish sandals today with my jeans, but only because it was fucking HOT

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 01:08 (eighteen years ago)

For footwear, I wear Vans (or generic brand) slip-ons (ie boat shoes) or Eccos. Right now, the latter look like this:
http://www2.ecco.com/ss2007/products/large/3806400160.jpg

I got them just as the summer started, tho, so haven't had much chance to wear them out.

the table is the table, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 01:15 (eighteen years ago)

u need to hit up the kenneth cole homie

deej, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 04:02 (eighteen years ago)

those eccos look like gabbneb shoes

deej, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 04:03 (eighteen years ago)

gabbneb shoes is the new A-shoes

cutty, Tuesday, 10 July 2007 04:04 (eighteen years ago)

The problem with Adult Male clothes is that, even though I could probably afford it, they always look so dull... Grey and black and beige and white seem to be the only colour options. I love bright colours and stripes and patterns, why are they considered verboten for adult guys? This is one thing I'm jealous of with girls and women, they have a much wider scale of looks they can choose from.

In Barcelona I saw this totally great looking suit, it was electric blue and shiny, like it was made for a glam schlager singer, but unfortunately it was a bit too expensive for my travel budget.

Tuomas, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 10:36 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, I'm very much a color guy, too. As many as I can get away with while still tying everything together, but not in a garish fashion. I'm very particular about making sure the uppermost article (hat? shirt? jacket?) matches the lowermost (shoes!), anything between is fair game.

The Reverend, Wednesday, 11 July 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

five months pass...

AND LOOK, IT'S...FARACHI

-- Hurting 2, Sunday, July 8, 2007 3:53 AM

5 am lolz

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 30 December 2007 11:46 (eighteen years ago)

six years pass...

something in me will never accept that 'slacks' count as dressed up, 'jeans' do not

why is that fabric a more respectable fabric, why

j., Wednesday, 9 July 2014 21:07 (eleven years ago)

it's because jeans are a symbol of individualism, which is the main thing that school and workplace dresscodes attempt to squash.

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 July 2014 21:22 (eleven years ago)

in some dress codes they, along with graphic t-shirts, are the only taboo left. you could wear camo cargo shorts at my prep school. obviously these rules are not about respectability or neatness but about suppressing jeans. on a related note, the most individualistic kind of jeans you can wear are JNCOs.

Treeship, Wednesday, 9 July 2014 21:26 (eleven years ago)

it's fucking hot & i just want to wear shorts to work but i don't want to cause an uproar

guwop (crüt), Wednesday, 9 July 2014 21:27 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.