Winamp Sucks

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Skinning is a bad feature. All the skins are ugly.
The interface widgets are crowded.
It doesn't support m4a.
The Library is a joke.

Many of my Windows using friends use it -- WHY!?!?!

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)

They don't know about QCD!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Windows Media Player - WHY DOES IT SUCK SO BAD?

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

What's QCD, Dang?!?!

Also - if you want ugly skins, try giving Windows Media Player a spin.

hstencil mind meld!

"Proud" Winamp User (popshots75`), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)

becuase the EQ display is better than WMP, and it has pre-amp controls

kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:50 (twenty-one years ago)

ah, memories.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Winamp is the best mp3 player ever. QCD is great for playing CDs.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm actually quite happy with Winamp at the moment, it seems to do exactly what I need it to.

I'm not really a big Windows user, but I'm on a windows system at the moment, and I found choosing an MP3 player to be a bit of a tricky job. I immediately chose iTunes, and was really impressed with it when I installed it, but then found that it doesn't really handle the media library feature as I'd like it to. I rip all my CDs to MP3 when I get them home, tag them up and put them in the right directory. Sometimes I move a directory or rename it, or download a song and stick it in an "unsorted" folder, and ideally I'd like the MP3 app to just find it when I start the program up.

I might be grossly mistaken, because it seems wrong, but it appears iTunes wants me to add my directories manually, and doesn't ever scan them for updates. This means that if I rename a track or move an album it gets lost and iTunes doesn't know where to find it. Similarly, if I delete a track, iTunes still thinks I want it in my media library. Winamp scans at a time you can specify (mine's set to every ten minutes) for changes in your "watch folders", and at startup.

I've not really got a way with words tonight, but hopefully you understand what I'm looking for in an MP3 player, so if you've got any suggestions for something better than Winamp I'd love to know, because Winamp isn't perfect.

In regards to the GUI, have you had a look at the "non-step" skin for Winamp? It's the only one I can cope with, and it's very nice indeed. Perhaps it's one of those things that suits my computer perfectly but would just get in the way for everyone else. And as for m4a support, you can get plugins to fix that. It also doesn't support FLAC from a default installation, but there are plenty of plugins to fix that.

Patrick Allan (adr), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)

iTunes is bloatware. It's far better on the Mac. There's no reason why I should have to wait when I click on an .mp3 file for some huge program to start up.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Spencer OTM. I use Foobar with Windows and iTunes on my Mac.

adam (adam), Thursday, 27 January 2005 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Skinning is a bad feature. All the skins are ugly.

Sknning is a bad feature anyway. It's one of those feature-creep features, the last one tacked on before the program becomes totally unusable.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)

jon, you're wrong.

i've tried foobar a gillion times but i can't seem to get the hang of it.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)

patrick, the feature you're describing is called folder monitoring. itunes' lack of it is one of a million reasons it beeeee-lows.

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Winamp does play .m4a, you just need a plugin. It will play a lot more formats than itunes will.

svend (svend), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)

iTunes is bloatware. It's far better on the Mac. There's no reason why I should have to wait when I click on an .mp3 file for some huge program to start up

Technically the bloat is quicktime not iTunes, basically iTunes for windows is iTunes straight recompiled for the Mac. Quicktime implements huge chunks of the apple API to make this and quickTime work with minimal recoding on their part, it's basically a built in emulator.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:09 (twenty-one years ago)

uh, iTunes has plugins too.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:10 (twenty-one years ago)


Technically the bloat is quicktime not iTunes, basically iTunes for windows is iTunes straight recompiled for the Mac. Quicktime implements huge chunks of the apple API to make this and quickTime work with minimal recoding on their part, it's basically a built in emulator.

It is not an emulator.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Not technically, but it's as big as one, so same diff.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)

WINAMP SUCKS!!!!

http://www.ezthemes.com/previews/d/dancingajigwa.jpg

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)

NO, YOU ARE DEAD WRONG. EMULATORS ARE NOT "BIG".

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, not an emulator.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~mjg103/forumstuff/vgm-media-library.png

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Foobar has a good masstagger, and I have gotten used to replaygain. Also, format strings.

W i l l (common_person), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.bongosoft.co.uk/ripple/screen-library.jpg
vs.
http://w3.msi.vxu.se/~pha/iped/macigt/picts/itunes.gif

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)

WINAMP RULEZ!!! It's one of the few programs I'm actually a fan of, as in, I'd get in a geeky argument about it.

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)

wow, i don't know what version you're getting those screen shots from. mine's hella small and simple and easy-to-use and takes up no memory.

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)

ok, nevermind, i never use the library tho. just open up an album and play it.

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)

NO, YOU ARE DEAD WRONG. EMULATORS ARE NOT "BIG".

What's the word, then? Clunky? Inefficient?

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)

ihttp://users.skynet.be/bk264570/WAPOpt.png

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:22 (twenty-one years ago)

http://1.im.cz/n/photo/01/76/02eqlen-original.jpg

look at the upside down tabs here


wtf

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)

which is why the required library setup in iTunes seems unnecessary and annoys me.

x-post

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)

you don't need to keep stuff in the library in itunes.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)

PS - HAVE HIGHER STANDARDS WINDOWS USERS

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Although it's easier if you do. I'm on your side, jon, believe it or not. I use iTunes on my PC, even though it's clunky. It's just better. And I like not even having the *option* of putting George Strait's face on my player. iTunes cares about me, and wants me to be cool.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

er... xpost

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/1999/12/15/S/large_image/Major_Tom-Remix_large.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)

all my friends who use winamp are forever saving playlist files, dragging directories in and squinting at tiny little windows of tiny lists written in tiny grey text on a black background.... UGH

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I take back what I said about all skins being bad. Somebody please try to make that look better k thanx.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/2004/8/9/S/large_image/TemplateMonster.jpg
http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/2004/10/24/S/large_image/LandOfTheKirby.gif

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

ihttp://www.winamp.com/customize/component/3/2005/1/13/S/large_image/blackwhite_version1.jpg

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/2001/2/1/S/large_image/McDonalds.jpg

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/2003/2/27/S/large_image/SURGE_amp.jpg

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I used this skin for years -- it's about as good as it gets.

http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/2001/11/10/S/large_image/Oxygen_2.jpg

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

My standards are very high indeed, and that's why I use winamp. It's certainly a different paradigm and maybe you should just accept that some people do things differently. I keep my mp3 files organized into windows folders and then click on the file itself when I want to hear it. Winamp starts playing it back immediately. That's all I care about!!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

so does iTunes, dood.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Patrick, why isn't it that nice by default? Most people have awful setups.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost except that it's slow. You're both right, really.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I keep my mp3 files organized into windows folders and then click on the file itself when I want to hear it. Winamp starts playing it back immediately.


Did you just upgrade from MS-DOS 5?

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I haven't noticed iTunes being THAT slow on a PC ever. That said, I wouldn't use it with less than 256 megs of ram probably. Time to get with the 90s if you have less than that.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/2003/8/13/S/large_image/Mountain_Dew_Code_Red_v176.jpg

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

QCD

I keep my mp3 files organized into windows folders and then click on the file itself when I want to hear it. Winamp starts playing it back immediately. That's all I care about!!

So why is Winamp better than the others for your purposes, Spencer? (I admit I switched to QCD because it had built-in OGG support but I think it might also have better mp3 playback plugins.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Yea, since I got an iPod (for cheap), using Ogg was out of the question. It was also annoying to have to explain to people what do to with an ogg.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/2001/11/27/S/large_image/jk_Ladybird.jpg

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Jon gets very emotionally involved with software. It's like that guy with cars, only without cars.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Did you just upgrade from MS-DOS 5?

hahaha

it's a windows thing, it really is. Remember Winamp 3, anyone? The buttons were actually invisible. They phased buttons out of the design. you were supposed to already know where the buttons were, and take some kind of perverse pride in being well-versed in this bad interface. It's a badge of geekdom or something.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

PLUS AOL OWNS IT.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 19:40 (twenty-one years ago)

So why is Winamp better than the others for your purposes, Spencer?

Actually, QCD would be just fine. I didn't find it to be any faster than winamp so I just stuck with it. I got an OGG plugin for it. The best thing about QCD is the CD playback without any skips.

Did you just upgrade from MS-DOS 5?

No. I use XP Pro with a lot of RAM and no matter what, winamp is faster to launch than iTunes. It's the one thing I really care about with mp3s, sorry if you hate me.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

if you have a lot of ram, just keep your mp3 player open. There's this thing called virtual memory and swapping to disk.....

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, maybe I don't notice the lag time so much because iTunes is *always* open on my computer, and with 512 RAM works just great, even running monster Adobe programs at the same time. I don't like the initial startup time, though, and I don't like having to remove Quicktime from my registry everytime I upgrade iTunes, because otherwise it'll slow startup down by, like, 2 minutes. Like somebody said already, Quicktime is really the proglem, not iTunes.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Right, well anyway, I'm just going to keep enjoying winamp thanks.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree with everything Patrick said.

Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Winamp V2.91 is great ive used it foreva. Winamp 3 and everything after sucks yes i agree.

charleston charge (chaki), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I am kind of infatuated with QCD. The various flavors of the Aluminum Ally skin (esp. Toxic Mini and Cryogenic Mini) and the BBX Mercury Micro skin are FANTASTIC.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.quinnware.com/img/skin_screens/AluminumAlloy.jpg
http://www.quinnware.com/img/skin_screens/BBXMercury.jpg

So sleek and sterile...

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)

oooooh, that's nice.

Also, Chaki, I use 2.9 too! Although someone told me that if you use v5 with the old skin that it's just as fast.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

nah dude stick with 2.9 seriously.

charleston charge (chaki), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Aside from some people who design skins who don't know their ass from their heads, whats wrong with the 'classic' Winamp design?

Tabs being placed at the bottom of the window and what else?

(The only thing I've ever hated is the random button).

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Most people have awful setups.

That's because most people have no taste.

I use XMMS. I have no idea what the theme I use is called, but I like to think it looks pretty good:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/sleepycaitlin/xmms1.png
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v357/sleepycaitlin/xmms2.png

(I opened XMMS specially to take screenshots for this thread, and that was the section of the playlist that randomly came up. Clearly, it could tell what I wanted it for.)

Frankly, I can't see what's wrong with placing tabs at the bottom of a dialog.

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 27 January 2005 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, my point was one of the tabs was for theming. who the fuck wants a tab dedicated to theming in the middle of the main gui of their mp3 player

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)

You guys are posting the worst winamp skins. There are literally thousands of them. I like a lot of the old stereo equipment ones with analog meters etc.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, I use the classic one anyway.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)

are you a ricer?

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know what that means. I eat rice sometimes. My dad eats it all the time.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

The Equalizer/Colour Theme/Options are on a secondary panel tabbed as 'Config.' Their also on the menu for 'Options' from the main window.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I wouldn't be at all surprised if there was a BBX Mercury skin for WinAmp.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I looked up "ricer." No, I tend to drive unmodified german sedans. However, I do sort of hot-rod my PC, but only under the hood. I'm not really into all those garish cases with neon and windows etc.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)

You guys are posting the worst winamp skins. There are literally thousands of them.

but -- and I think this is jon's point -- most of them are quite bad, and having thousands of options does not improve this. "Freedom of Choice," you know, like Devo said. Eventually you just get tired of browsing skins and pick something that's terrible looking.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)

That's completely illogical. Why wouldn't anyone just pick one that they like and use it?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)

There are hundreds of really good ones too.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, why ask me if I'm a ricer?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Does anyone have the ipod plug-in for winamp working?

57 7th (calstars), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

That's completely illogical.

Well, the thing is, the skinning is considered a big fun feature, rather than a one-time choice. Like, I think there are people who sit around skinning thier winamp player all day, and it's just stupid, but it's one of the big features of winamp, dontcha know. The skin it somes with basically forces you to modify it, it's so damn ugly. So you go to the website and are immediately overwhelmed by thousands and thousands of choices, none of which look all that great...

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

my powerpuff girls skin was completely awesome

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

ITunes uses my scrotal hair for dental floss. WinAmp 5 (classic skin) is about a gabillion factors of ten better as an mp3 *player*, for a number of reasons (MAD decoder, anyone?). Still, I use Anapod for my Ipodding needs, rather than the WinAmp Ipod plugin. I agree that the WinAmp disk library is not user-friendly, but it's lightyears better than ITunes for netradio and video, IMHO.

I used the WinAmp Ipod plugin for a while, but I found it to be a bit sluggish and not so great for ID3 tag editing. EphPod's an improvement, seeing as how it's free and all, but if you're looking for the real deal for Windoze AnaPod is the way.

J (Jay), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Literally no one does that besides people who make skins, Kenan.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)

well, and teenagers. but yeah, i'm probably overstating the problem.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the classic skin is fine/functional. I've tried better looking ones, but I keep reverting to the old one.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/customize/component/2003/12/23/S/large_image/iTunes_4_Winamp_5.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Jay, are you comic book guy?

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Jon, "ricer?"

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, there must be a way to put that idea without the semi-ethnic slur.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:42 (twenty-one years ago)

or hell, just straight-out ethnic slur. It's like "beaner," innit?

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I have had several skins I thought were pretty! Like, if you browse by user rating, they are mostly non-ugly. It is not that hard.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:44 (twenty-one years ago)

rice-and-beaner

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:46 (twenty-one years ago)

dude: that is so not an ethnic slur

IT REFERS TO ASIAN SPORT IMPORT CARS DUMB FUCK

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricer

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Drivers of rice burners are known as "ricers" or "rice boys". These terms are often used as a pejorative or ethnic slur.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you really think I meant it that way?

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:54 (twenty-one years ago)

No, that would've been pretty out of the blue. It was just funny that your "I wasn't using an ethnic slur!" link was "hello, I am an ethnic slur."

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)

HI DERE HOW IS EVERBODY HOPED THEY HAD A NICE CHISTMAS,TOA LL GAYGAZ,JONATHONG WILAMS,IAN BELLBERRY,DEAN GAYBERRU,U CAN STOP USING MY WORDS NOW,I ENVENTED GET ONE LIFE AND IT WSA FUNY WEHN I SED IT BUT NOT FUNY WEHN YUO SED IT

Amazing Randy (TEH REAL) (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I assumed that it wouldn't say that it was a slur and jsut get at the real meaning behind the word.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Jon, "DUMB FUCK?"

Also, so you're asking me if I am a car?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a fair question, Spencer, you're pretty sleek.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 27 January 2005 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Drivers of rice burners are known as "ricers" or "rice boys".

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Something in my genes apparently draws me to this:
http://www.spotterx.com/pictures/picoftheweek/ricer.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)

or this:

http://www.thebestcasescenario.com/toxic/toxic1a.jpg

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm totally shopping for a new PC, but have to pay extra to get a case that's *not* all alien looking.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Jon, are you a dick? Oh wait . . .

J (Jay), Friday, 28 January 2005 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Krista Chainsaw

shit i just erased my whole playlist

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Friday, 28 January 2005 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder why so many of the images upthread don't work today???

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 28 January 2005 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

and now they show up again!?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 28 January 2005 23:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Spencer, that car almost made me hork up a lung.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 28 January 2005 23:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Back to point: Winamp has got one killer feature that I've yet to find/make happen in iTunes: it can kill the silence between mp3s. I've tried using the iTunes crossfader set to 0 seconds to achieve this but it doesn't work...

tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Saturday, 29 January 2005 11:40 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean if you really like the look of iTunes...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v356/kenjuggle3/winamp.jpg

ken c (ken c), Saturday, 29 January 2005 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)

now here's a good PC mod
http://apple2history.org/museum/images/p2_7side_of_case.jpg

ken c (ken c), Saturday, 29 January 2005 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

as for cars.
http://www.glitschisoft.ch/fun/appleicar.jpg

ken c (ken c), Saturday, 29 January 2005 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)

also winamp shoutcast is pretty fun.

ken c (ken c), Sunday, 30 January 2005 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

i like Winamp - the streaming audio/video channel selection could be better tho, and the library doesn't recognise all mp3s for some reason. who gives a shit about how bad 95% of the skins are? BITTER LINUX NERDS THAT'S WHO

Stevem On X (blueski), Sunday, 30 January 2005 22:48 (twenty-one years ago)

winamp is for ricers

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Sunday, 30 January 2005 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.glowire.com/mkdark.jpg http://www.glowire.com/troy.jpg

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Sunday, 30 January 2005 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Apropos of nothing, I just discovered the silver scheme for Windows XP and I am now in love.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 January 2005 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, that default blue is really awful.

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Monday, 31 January 2005 02:48 (twenty-one years ago)

haha ricers

http://wizardishungry.com/lol/screenshots/desktop-26oct2004.jpg

ken c (ken c), Monday, 31 January 2005 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)

here is a gem from livejournal:


as i'm grading assignments for [REDACTED] i come across a pile of late assignments from a boy who's never submitted anything before last week. all the assignments are perfect and commented like whoa and i note on his gradesheets 'beautiful comments!' goldstar smileyface A+

then i notice one of his class headers has another student's name and section number and is dated 2 weeks before any of the other classes are dated. and in fact, all of the late assignments this boy magically submitted now are styled identically to the class submitted with the erroneous header info.

instead of sending him a response of a couple of fat 0s and an F in the course as dictated by the [REDACTED] academic honesty policy, i decide to search thefacebook so i could have a snarl or two at the cheater and accomplice. expecting ricers or frat pledges that list 'beer, chicks' as their interests, i am surprised to find perfectly normal, adequately acceptable, friendly, intelligent looking, non-gross, indie rockers. sigh. the boy gets his 10% off, which leaves him with an 88. and i will probably tell the incredibly friendly push-over professor (who brings pizza and fresh fruit into the i.t. programming labs for her class) that she might want to check this out. maybe.

:(

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Monday, 31 January 2005 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)

wake up jon, this is not real.

there's no such thing as a perfectly normal, adequately acceptable, friendly, intelligent looking, non-gross, indie rocker.

ken c (ken c), Monday, 31 January 2005 06:00 (twenty-one years ago)

no shit, MY EX GIRLFRIEND POSTED THAT.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Monday, 31 January 2005 06:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I think she probably used to lurk on Sinister! When we were dating, she had "his" and "hers" Belle and Sebastian mugs.

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Monday, 31 January 2005 06:20 (twenty-one years ago)

aw cute

i'm making belle and sebastian skins for my winamp.

ken c (ken c), Monday, 31 January 2005 06:24 (twenty-one years ago)

WHERE IS THE PICTURE OF THE BELLE AND SEBASTIAN CAR I WANNA RICE IT OUTT HX

Reviewer: Sir Potomus (Washington, DC) - See all my reviews (ex machina), Monday, 31 January 2005 06:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I read the phrase "belle and sebastian skins" and now I want to kill myself.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 31 January 2005 22:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I really, really like the way the Winamp skin I use looks:

http://deanna.ladyinterference.com/ilx/winamp01312005.jpg

If you look hard enough, you can find awesome skins, y'know.

Surreal Addiction (Dee the Lurker), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i haven't used it in a long time but i remember qcd being about the only player that would play blended cd tracks without having a little pause between

ronny longjohns (ronny longjohns), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

wow nice skin dee!

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

QCD is fantastic. Also, everyone knows the slang definition for "skins", yes?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)

http://download.nullsoft.com/customize/component/2004/2/25/S/large_image/The_Man_Machine.gif

briania (briania), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

winamp shits all over anything else. i used itunes for a while but found it to be slow, buggy and a major hassle to use: either you let it choose what to play or you're in for major effort 24/7. any features itunes users claim it has over winamp (smart playlists) can be found in the medialibrary. and as for good skins, they're in abundance.

i guess this comes next,
http://photos1.flickr.com/1208662_90173b6052_o.jpg

ave satani (lemike), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)

wow nice skin dee!

It's a great one, isn't it? Credit whomever went by "mookid loves Bowie" on the Winamp site for the skin. All I had to do was download it. :)

Surreal Addiction (Dee the Lurker), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)

any features itunes users claim it has over winamp (smart playlists) can be found in the medialibrary.

It doesn't sync with my iPod, so...

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)

FWIW I have no use for Winamp and didn't when I had a PC--but iTunes is slow and I'm ON A FUCKING MAC. Spencer is right--there's a longer lag for it to start up on my Mac then there was with my old MP3 equip on my old computer. iTunes is also a pile of bullshit on my computer for about 8,000 other reasons but whatever, I'm the idiot who purchased a Mac which apparently has a shitty music program and the world's flimsiest keyboard.

Allyzay Highlights The Fallacy of Radiohead (allyzay), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't get me wrong, I really like my Mac in all other aspects besides the programs that came with the fucking thing: Appleworks is incompatible with about 800 things I need it to do, iTunes has completely been shit for my purposes (and I've needed to reinstall it twice to get it to fucking burn CDs), iPhoto is one of the most useless photo programs ever created, etc etc. Everything I've put on this computer myself is fantastic though.

Allyzay Highlights The Fallacy of Radiohead (allyzay), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I hear that the new version of iPhoto should be somewhat improved. I've not had huge problems with iTunes, except that I had to retag and refile all of my mp3s to get them to behave nicely with my system of organisation.

That said, iCal and Address Book kick ass!

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

iTunes won't even let me retag my MP3s consistently. It wil lrevert back to the original "messed up" tagging as soon as I play it or burn it. I've tried every single thing that has been suggested to me to do, there are no permissions issues on the computer or anything, it just won't fix. At least the burning issue fixxed though, I can live with the bad MP3 tags, but the refusing to burn thing was beyond the pale. It burned at like 2x speed and the CDs were unplayable. It kind of stunned me actually. I really, really dislike iTunes to be honest; I hate the fact that their default is to take all your MP3s and then try to duplicate them to "add to the iTunes directory" or however they explain it. It's completely backwards Windowsesque shit if you ask me. I made the mistake when I reloaded iTunes to not double check preferences BEFORE I tried to readd by 27gigs or so of MP3s and I thought my computer was going to self-destruct.

iPhoto annoys me because it has absolutely no options to it besides "red eye reduction" (which makes people look like zombies) and cropping but whatever, yo uget what you pay for.

Allyzay Highlights The Fallacy of Radiohead (allyzay), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate the fact that their default is to take all your MP3s and then try to duplicate them to "add to the iTunes directory" or however they explain it.

Yeah, I hate that too. Still, if you don't own an iPod (or even if you do) there are alterantives.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 04:24 (twenty-one years ago)

you get what you pay for

What kind of Mac is this? iMac? G4? How much memory?

Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

nf, i've used winamp to sync my ipod for months.
http://mlipod.sourceforge.net/

ave satani (lemike), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 07:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm using a less than a year old iBook, top of the line for that category of Macs. I couldn't afford a powerbook so I souped up an iBook.

Allyzay Highlights The Fallacy of Radiohead (allyzay), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 07:53 (twenty-one years ago)

good skins:
ihttp://download.nullsoft.com/customize/component/2002/10/1/S/large_image/ExpensiveHi-Fi.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

ihttp://download.nullsoft.com/customize/component/2001/10/11/S/large_image/Nucleo_NLog_v102_.jpg

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
http://www.radlight.net/forum/uploads/post-2-1079038424.png
http://winamp.happy-phantom.org/arislan.gif
http://winamp.happy-phantom.org/edgar2.gif
http://www.anime-skins.com/winamp2/amg/rosematter.jpg

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:10 (twenty years ago)

are they your own skins?

Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:22 (twenty years ago)

foobar 4eva

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 17:24 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h17/fauxhemian00/desktop.jpg

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:25 (twenty years ago)

"winampa.exe" is the Winamp Agent for playing MP3 files.
Note: Any malware can be named winampa.exe - check if winampa.exe is located in the folder C:\Program Files\Winamp\.

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:37 (twenty years ago)

http://download.nullsoft.com/customize/component/2005/1/1/S/large_image/-MfS2-.jpg

i am using this skin rite now! all wmp skins are disgusting but then so's everything

rtcotm (mwah), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:42 (twenty years ago)

comic sans!

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:43 (twenty years ago)

you probably have another instance for winamp.exe running concurrently with winampa.exe, faux

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:43 (twenty years ago)

ya how transgressive can u get

rtcotm (mwah), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:44 (twenty years ago)

http://telcontar.net/Screenshots/Winamp.php

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 18:55 (twenty years ago)

WHY!?!?! I use Winamp...

Skinning is a bad feature. All the skins are ugly.
Nucleo Old School 4 life!!
p.s. iTunes since v.5 ahaha :-D and you're stuck with it...
The interface widgets are crowded.
Whatever, it saves screen space.
It doesn't support m4a.
It does now.
The Library is a joke.
it's slightly ugly, but pretty much comparable to iTunes in functionality (equally annoying/insufficient at times too!) except I can actually search by hard disk folder name unlike iTunes search.

"winampa.exe" is the Winamp Agent for playing MP3 files

afaik winampa.exe is some launch at start-up quick-start helper & update tool. Nothing to do with playing files... I either deselect it during install or remove it in msconfig from ever starting. I don't need it.

Winamp starts playing it back immediately. That's all I care about!!

-- Spencer Chow

so does iTunes, dood.

-- Pears can just fuck right off.

Alternatively Winamp can also enqueue! iTunes is fucking unbelievable for overlooking this. You click/select something - it plays! even if something else was playing in the meantime, it instantly interrupts/overrides it. Infuriating.

Winamp is better not just because iTunes sucks a million ways, but because it's still just better/smaller/faster. For every minor Winamp bug, iTunes has the performance of a three-toed sloth, UI decisions that though pretty, are terrible to actually USE and an added sense of intrusiveness into other processes & parts of your computer.

It doesn't just even out, it actually tips the balance from "ok, it's a mp3 program" to "fuck this p.o.s.!"

Can you keep a copy of iTunes on your flash drive like I do with my personal Winamp setup?

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 20:40 (twenty years ago)

Alternatively Winamp can also enqueue! iTunes is fucking unbelievable for overlooking this. You click/select something - it plays! even if something else was playing in the meantime, it instantly interrupts/overrides it. Infuriating.

i am an itunes guy but this is so true

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 20:47 (twenty years ago)

Whatever, it saves screen space.
Time for a user to locate a widget on the screen is inversely proportional to the size. Hope everyone has good eyes and a good mouse.

except I can actually search by hard disk folder name unlike iTunes search.
Again, the point is to not care about the disk representation.

afaik winampa.exe is some launch at start-up quick-start helper & update tool. Nothing to do with playing files... I either deselect it during install or remove it in msconfig from ever starting. I don't need it.
Did you even read the thread? My point was the memory usage in the image that dude linked for "winampa.exe" was not winamp's usage since winampa is the agent.

Alternatively Winamp can also enqueue! iTunes is fucking unbelievable for overlooking this. You click/select something - it plays! even if something else was playing in the meantime, it instantly interrupts/overrides it. Infuriating.

It'd be nice to have this for the few times I need it. (You can enqueue with drag and drop of course) But again, the point is that you use the iTunes library to browse your music, rather than a file browser.

IF YOU ARE USING A FILE BROWSER TO BROWSE MUSIC, WINAMP'S LIBRARY MUST BE WORSE THAN WINDOWS EXPLORER.

an added sense of intrusiveness into other processes & parts of your computer.
Like?

Can you keep a copy of iTunes on your flash drive like I do with my personal Winamp setup?

Why would I want to put a copy of winamp on a flash drive? So I can put 10 mp3s on the flashdrive and play them on any random computer I come to? Or I could put 20 on there and skip the winamp garbage. ;)

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 20:49 (twenty years ago)

I'd like something like "double option clicking on a file enqueues it to the currently playing playlist" Of course, if the currently playing thing is a meta data based view, it should copy the current thing to party shuffle then enqueue the new item

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 20:51 (twenty years ago)

But I mean, within iTunes. Fuck using a file browser to find mp3s

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 20:51 (twenty years ago)

Whatever, it saves screen space.
Time for a user to locate a widget on the screen is inversely proportional to the size. Hope everyone has good eyes and a good mouse.

get one doublesize or keyboard shortcut, or skin with bigger buttons/better layout for eye troubles.

except I can actually search by hard disk folder name unlike iTunes search.
Again, the point is to not care about the disk representation.

No the point is to use whichever method springs to mind quickest to locate something I want to find, like my folder for "# Mixes" which, if not tagged as such in iTunes is -fuck all- use searching for a ID3 tag. Sometimes I want to find a group of files, without using explorer.

IF YOU ARE USING A FILE BROWSER TO BROWSE MUSIC, WINAMP'S LIBRARY MUST BE WORSE THAN WINDOWS EXPLORER.

no dude, I just don't do every single thing ever via apple's relational database model ffs!

Did you even read the thread? My point was the memory usage in the image that dude linked for "winampa.exe" was not winamp's usage since winampa is the agent.

I skimmed it but fair enough, it's still not an agent "for playing" mp3 files.

It'd be nice to have this for the few times I need it. (You can enqueue with drag and drop of course) But again, the point is that you use the iTunes library to browse your music, rather than a file browser.

The FEW times? I have Winamp set to "enqueue on click" since forever you must have -no idea- how maddening the lack of this feature is.

Oh but wait I can drag & drop instead?? from my search results? into a playlist? this is all workaround BS that is so much more fuss than a feature which should just be in there.

an added sense of intrusiveness into other processes & parts of your computer.
Like?

Re-organising all your filenames/folder structure/tags if you're not wise, stupid background processes for burning (if I don't have anything to burn today?), all sorts of crap.

Can you keep a copy of iTunes on your flash drive like I do with my personal Winamp setup?

Why would I want to put a copy of winamp on a flash drive? So I can put 10 mp3s on the flashdrive and play them on any random computer I come to? Or I could put 20 on there and skip the winamp garbage. ;)

A - portable, so that I can play whatever is on my iPod/2GB flash drive on any PC I sit at at work INCLUDING .m4a files which Windows Media Player won't do, and neither will iTunes, unless I install it. And for adding anything I've grabbed to my iPod library for the bus ride home. That's why!

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:12 (twenty years ago)

p.s. sorry I sound combative/shouty, I'm pretty cheery today actually. There's way too much text above though.

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:15 (twenty years ago)

Just to repeat, I find iTunes AND Winamp's library/database function lacking/annoying quite a lot of the time, but I mostly don't use explorer. Sometimes though situatuons come up where it's just quicker the "old" way.

I do realise absolutely anything is better than using OS X's "finder" though, like kicking yourself repeatedly in the balls for instance ;)

http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/9697/untitled1copy8oc.jpg

COLD. DEAD. HANDS. ok?

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:20 (twenty years ago)

get one doublesize or keyboard shortcut, or skin with bigger buttons/better layout for eye troubles.

We all know doublesize is awful and all features should be easily accessable via the mouse. Time to use widget still a problem.

I want to find, like my folder for "# Mixes" which, if not tagged as such in iTunes is -fuck all- use searching for a ID3 tag.

Drag a playlist dir/m3u to the playlist list in itunes, drop. You now have a Playlist named whatever. Of course, if you use Winamp, a single file can't be in IAMAHUGEIDIOT and in IAMAMORON. Unless you use m3u files. Which you have to save.

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:47 (twenty years ago)

Also, re that last skin, GUI rotating knobs are among the worst things ever

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:49 (twenty years ago)

That's a really valid criticism jon
I think file under cozy techno mostly has me convinced. That's nice skin, too. Where do they sell these windows machines

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:54 (twenty years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/player/

Check out the "Pro" features (aka uncripples) and then all the EXTRA GREAT "features" (aka bundling) in Standard.

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:55 (twenty years ago)

TOMBOT in strawman argument shocka.

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:55 (twenty years ago)

There's a big difference between doing weird shit in OS X and pausing your mp3 player :D


Here's what you get when you buy Pro:

Unrestricted CD Burning
Winamp Pro enables you to burn your favorite music compilations at your computer's full potential. Once registered, Winamp Pro will allow you to burn your CDs at speeds up to 48x, 9 times the speed of Winamp 5! (Actual speeds may differ, depending on your computer's specifications.)

WE UNCRIPPLE THE CD BURNING!

MP3 Encoding
With Winamp Pro, you can rip all your favorite music CDs into the industry leading MP3 format. When all your songs are encoded in MP3, it provides you the freedom to play them in all MP3 capable hardware and software media players.

AT LEAST WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER HAD A VERTICALLRY INTEGRATED BUSINESS PLAN THAT MADE THIS A GOOD FEATURE FOR MS TO OMIT!

Unrestricted CD Ripping
Buying Winamp Pro enables you to convert all of your favorite music CDs into digital files at your computer's maximum potential. Once registered, Winamp Pro can rip your CDs at speeds up to 48x, 9 times the speed of Winamp 5! (Actual speeds may differ, depending on your computer's specifications.)

WOW IT ONLY RIPS AT ~5.5X? IS THIS 1998? I am guessing they are refering to the speed of rip+encode but I really doubt they actually encode at 48x. More likely it rips at 48x and enqueues the files for encoding.

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 21:59 (twenty years ago)

WINAMP = DUMBEST SHIT EVER

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:00 (twenty years ago)

Also remember the worms that were being distributed using skin files? We have yet to see an m4a worm :D

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:01 (twenty years ago)

Why isn't there a thread about how ugly and stupid Banshee is?

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:02 (twenty years ago)

how about that iTunes clone that runs in Firefox using XUL? :D

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:04 (twenty years ago)

yeah doublesize *is* a weak response... still, aren't there bigger modern skins now? They should put a accessibility enhanced skin in the default setup options perhaps. I'm not saying you don't have a point, just that you're overstating it's importancce by miles.

GUI knobs are annoying... so I always set mine to max and use another control (or get another skin if I cared)! It's not THAT hard.

I never said it's perfect! it's just that iTunes is *terrible*

I want to find, like my folder for "# Mixes" which, if not tagged as such in iTunes is -fuck all- use searching for a ID3 tag.

Drag a playlist dir/m3u to the playlist list in itunes, drop. You now have a Playlist named whatever. Of course, if you use Winamp, a single file can't be in IAMAHUGEIDIOT and in IAMAMORON. Unless you use m3u files. Which you have to save.

wtf?? Which playlist is this? ... the playlist of the physical files/folder from explorer/finder dropped into iTunes (does it update automatically?) or the playlist of the stuff I found in a search which didn't show up properly that I couldn't find??

None of this sounds quick to me!

actually, I don't even NEED to do this usually. I have a smart view set up in Winamp that filters everything in this /# mixes folder so I don't need to type it much, if ever. LAST time I checked iTunes didn't allow filters/searches relating to the -OH NOES!- actual hard disk directory, but this might have changed. Probably not though because it's bad because Apple thinks I am stupid for ever needing this feature or something? Ooookay.

I don't know who these people are who are constantly saving .m3u .whatever playlists outside of iTunes/Winamp Library. You're making out like this is something essential people need to do to use Winamp! Tag/name your files properly instead or something, it works just as well as -

list.m3u
1) bulshit file.m4a
2) filefromkazzaa.mp3
3) 1-brittanyspears-lucky.mp3

Don't blame Winamp for dumb users or I'll just point you to all the "where did my music go I lost it all when iTunes updated boo hoo" threads in response.

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:13 (twenty years ago)

this one: http://www.songbirdnest.com/


xpost

does it update automatically?

NO I AM TALKING ABOUT HOW BRAIN DEAD IDIOTS LIKE YOU CAN IMPORT THEIR STUPID FILESYSTEM STRUCTURES TO ITUNES!

LAST time I checked iTunes didn't allow filters/searches relating to the -OH NOES!- actual hard disk directory

WHY WASTE TIME ORGANIZING THAT STUFF? ITUNES META INFO BUILDS THE TREE FOR YOU = ONLY ONE PLACE TO MANAGE THAT

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:16 (twenty years ago)

the "pro features" business is dumb I agree... it's like they don't care about competing anymore

I don't need any of it though :/
iTunes doesn't even get the "playing" bit right enough for me, never mind trusting it with additional functions that other programs handle, like ripping (Exact Audio Copy/LAME) & tagging (plenty of windows programs, NOTHING even acceptable on Macs esp. not iTunes).

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:20 (twenty years ago)

Wait, that is completely unquantified.

The thing that bugs me about iTunes is it has been fucking up zero second track crossfades for several versions.

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:22 (twenty years ago)

xpost

does it update automatically?

NO I AM (not?) TALKING ABOUT HOW BRAIN DEAD IDIOTS LIKE YOU CAN IMPORT THEIR STUPID FILESYSTEM STRUCTURES TO ITUNES!

LAST time I checked iTunes didn't allow filters/searches relating to the -OH NOES!- actual hard disk directory

WHY WASTE TIME ORGANIZING THAT STUFF? ITUNES META INFO BUILDS THE TREE FOR YOU = ONLY ONE PLACE TO MANAGE THAT

-- R.I.P. Concrete Octop

Fucks sake.

Yeah I wasted so much time that one time I did it and now never have to type that search again! I thought you people liked smart searches??!

Fucks sake.

I keep files I have tagged and files I haven't apart.
I keep files which are part of a structure (album, e.p.) and files which are not (single mp3's, mixes etc) APART.

IS THAT SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND??

They don't get mixed up in one big mess, and also additionally if I want to, I can add BOTH to the database, still not mixing them up but having access to each as I wish. BEST OF BOTH WORLDS!

iTunes didn't let me do this last time I checked. so fuck iTunes and it's "there is only one way and that is the new way" bullshit.

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:27 (twenty years ago)

FROM TODAY

"TURN THAT OPTION OFF THEN
WHAT IF I WANT IT ON NORMALLY?"
well if you want it BOTH ways, you can hold down apple key to temporarily over-ride that setting :-)

-- Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (AlanTrewarth...) (webmail), March 21st, 2006 12:23 PM. (Alan) (later) (link)

while dragging in the mp3 i mean obv
-- Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (AlanTrewarth...) (webmail), March 21st, 2006 12:23 PM. (Alan) (later) (link)

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:31 (twenty years ago)

Yeah I wasted so much time that one time I did it and now never have to type that search again! I thought you people liked smart searches??!

NEVER HAVE TO.... UNTIL YOU MOVE STUFF IN YOUR PRECIOUS FILESYTEM

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:32 (twenty years ago)

I in fact use THE SAME SCHEME AS YOU, but with no real care in the fs layout of my "crap" system.

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:33 (twenty years ago)

wtf?? Which playlist is this? ... the playlist of the physical files/folder from explorer/finder dropped into iTunes (does it update automatically?) or the playlist of the stuff I found in a search which didn't show up properly that I couldn't find??

WHAT IS IN YOUR "#MIXES" DIRECTORY

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:34 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand that either, john, why can't they get iPhoto to work as well as iTunes. Filesystems are an abstraction so why should layering one abstraction on another bother anyone.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 22:37 (twenty years ago)

Honestly, if they fixed the rest of the basic operations bullshit which cripples iTunes I'd like to do a proper side-by-side comparison of both their database functions.

iTunes would be a LOT more pleasing to me (and even convince me to maybe give up using a well-organised , uncomplicated dir structure as non-program backup organisation) if the inbuilt ID3 tagging functions weren't woefully inadequate & inconsistent & requiring of constant micromanagement, compared with many dedicated Windows ID3 programs.

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 23:01 (twenty years ago)

Dude, my mom uses iTunes

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 23:23 (twenty years ago)

And that proves what?

I never said iTunes is difficult to use. Just that it doesn't do some things Winamp does. And the things it lacks tend to unfortunately be things that make my life easier & happier.

file under cozy techno (fandango), Tuesday, 21 March 2006 23:40 (twenty years ago)

funny now jw's benchmark screenshot above doesn't have iTunes on it!!!!!! :-D

here's one i prepared earlier
http://www.lolrider.com/lol/shoutcast.jpg

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 00:08 (twenty years ago)

and then i thought, hang on! winamp is just about as memory hungry as iTunes!!! then i remembered i left shoutcast on.

turned it off. and...
http://www.lolrider.com/lol/lol.jpg

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 00:10 (twenty years ago)

guys let's just agree that BOTH of these programs are kind of crap, I mean what are you people arguing about?

Allyzay Rofflesberger (allyzay), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 00:11 (twenty years ago)

but then i realised that it's not really fair because you know, iTunes does so much more. like, let you spend money on it's iTunes music store and stuff. So to level the playing field. I turned on some visualisations on winamp just for good measure..

http://www.lolrider.com/lol/visualisation.JPG

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 00:11 (twenty years ago)

oh ally i don't care about either programs at all.. i just like collecting CPU usage statistics. :-D

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 00:13 (twenty years ago)

Those are memory usage statistics. I am going to deport you back to your mother country and have you make me SANDISK memory until you learn your lesson.

R.I.P. Concrete Octopus ]-`: is a guy with a belly button piercing (ex machina), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 03:16 (twenty years ago)

not like it needs any saying, but i am a bit of a computer dumbass and should probably stay out of these threads. *goes back to sad Word life*

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 03:39 (twenty years ago)

*plays album I want to hear in three seconds*

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 03:40 (twenty years ago)

i just dl'd the latest winamp and kind of like it. there are a few tasteful yet high-contrast skins, the display is configurable enough to get it to how i like it, and it's just easy to use. i dont use the medial library, as it's hard to find what i want (when most of my music is DL'd, it's hard to get things tagged quite right, so fuck it, i just use explorer) but i also dont use itunes. fuck itunes, winamp, though flawed is better than that crap.

also, i've never ever had any problems running any version of winamp on any pc, even really super shitty ones.

AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:18 (twenty years ago)

just don't use iTUNES to deport me to hard labour camp! by the time it loads up i'd be of retirement age innit.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:30 (twenty years ago)

(also notice how the lists in the screenshots are sorted by the CPU column)

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 March 2006 04:31 (twenty years ago)

Pretty annoyed with Winamp today actually :|

The iPod support is simple & sturdy enough, but has a majorly annoying "feature" that if you leave the album tag* blank, when transferred across to your iPod, it guesses(?) and steals the track title info.

This is getting in the way of trying to separate albums & non-album material. Grrr.

The non-album stuff is in a playlist, it _shouldn't_ be showing up elsewhere.

iTunes really isn't flexible enough for me, but I do understand why more people use it.

Going to muddle through & maybe uninstall the iPod support & reinstall the old plugin (worked fine, but was annoying to configure) :/


*note: none of these files are in the Media Library, so it shouldn't be that that's causing problems unless there's some intermingling going on.

Delivering over 43,973,865,717,760 bytes per day | What are you sending? (fandan, Friday, 31 March 2006 21:40 (twenty years ago)

or it could have been the db getting corrupted when I forget to "eject iPod" before removing it (via "safely remove" not just pulling the cord off).

Either way... fixed, but Winamp's in-built iPod (and other devices) support is nowhere near good enough (fully featured) or usable (see crap like above) as the iPod (only) plug-in.

:(

Delivering over 43,973,865,717,760 bytes per day | What are you sending? (fandan, Friday, 31 March 2006 23:33 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

Since I upgraded my version of Winamp recently, I've noticed that I am getting a glitch pretty frequently when I load web pages! This has never happened before that I can recall. Should I be using something else at this point? Has Windows Media Player gotten any better? I may try it regardless, as I am sick of what Winamp is doing.

_Rudipherous_, Friday, 19 March 2010 10:36 (sixteen years ago)

yep, same here. i thought it was soemthing to do with my outboard soundcard and not necessarily the new winamp as when i use my internal soundcard there are no problems, but now you mention it.

dog latin, Friday, 19 March 2010 11:21 (sixteen years ago)

windows media player is still horrific, i'm sure
i am down w/musikCube.
foobar2000 is probably the best out there but you have to set up a lot of stuff (like the layout) yourself, which can be a drag

hobbes, Friday, 19 March 2010 19:36 (sixteen years ago)

I've been using VLC for about a year now, after a solid 10-13 years of winamp use. The kicker was that whenever I recorded something in Ableton and played it in Winamp it would make it really loud and apply nasty compression to it. VLC doesn't.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 19 March 2010 21:59 (sixteen years ago)

I am a Mac ricer now.

Spencer Chow, Friday, 19 March 2010 22:19 (sixteen years ago)

Winamp has been sturdy for me. I usually pirate a copy of pro for burning cds - I find one on soulseek. Then I download i-pod support from some 3rd party. But I can't say I've had webpage or audio problems. Winamp's organizing system/playlist making is tops and i-pod and cd-burning is easy to use.

CaptainLorax, Friday, 19 March 2010 22:21 (sixteen years ago)

i used to use winamp, but foobar2000 is definitely the way to go. i don't use music player library systems, though, so ymmv. i prefer to just browse my files in folders on my hard drive.

karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Friday, 19 March 2010 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

yeah same here. the cool thing about foobar2000 (and to an extent musikCube) is you can play around w/it to best suit your listening/organizational habits.

hobbes, Friday, 19 March 2010 22:48 (sixteen years ago)

Went Mac too, but before that I was really into MediaMonkey.

Nhex, Saturday, 20 March 2010 00:50 (sixteen years ago)

does anyone use songbird? i installed it (on my mac) but found it not that big an improvement over itunes; it plays flacs though if you are into that.

akm, Saturday, 20 March 2010 05:03 (sixteen years ago)

Hey fellow Winamp guys, is the problem you're having that you get a popup error message that's obviously caused by Winamp but attributed to your browser?

DISASTÜR ZÜN RHINE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Saturday, 20 March 2010 07:05 (sixteen years ago)

http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1932236&start=0&tstart=0

sort of, but not really.

http://lifehacker.com/5356619/itunes-finally-adds-watched-folder-to-automatically-add-new-music

works if you let iTunes manage... etc

fndgo, Saturday, 20 March 2010 13:06 (sixteen years ago)

I'm thinking my problem had less to do with Winamp than with Firefox. I went back to Windows Media player (after being confused about how to make a connection between MusikCube and my mp3s and not feeling like having to figure it out) but I am still getting frequent pauses/glitches in the sound when I load certain pages while listening to music. But I just switched to Opera and it doesn't seem to be happening now. Also, Opera seems really great in general. I like how quickly things are loading. I definitely see a difference. (I will probably re-load Winamp and see if the problem returns when I use it with Opera.)

_Rudipherous_, Sunday, 28 March 2010 11:26 (sixteen years ago)

I use Opera, but I get the popup error message I mentioned above. I should just learn my lesson and never update winamp, 4 out of 5 times it just causes problems.

drinkin a carton of peace juice (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Sunday, 28 March 2010 13:12 (sixteen years ago)

ten months pass...

technical question

I right click on a folder to play it in winamp. It contains subfolders as well as files. Let's say it has these:

Folder A containing files a1, a2
Folder B containing files b1, b2
Folder C containing files c1, c2
file d1
file d2

(with the x1's being alphabetically ordered before the x2's)

Winamp plays or enqueues them in this order:
c1, c2, b1, b2, d1, d2, a1, a2

putting the folders in reverse order, and inserting the un-foldered files before the first folder (which is played last).

I would like to play them in this order: a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2, d1, d2.

How do I change this?

a nan, a bal, an anal ― (abanana), Sunday, 6 February 2011 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

Click the 'Misc' button at the bottom of the playlist editor, go to sort and select 'Sort by path and filename'.

I think this is what you're after.

James Mitchell, Sunday, 6 February 2011 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

What OS and Winamp version are you on? They get enqueued in alphabetical order for me (though with files and folders interspersed, so a file beginning with T appears between folder S and folder U) on Windows 7 and v5.572 of Winamp.

I remember having a similar problem on XP if I selected all the contents of a folder and dragged them into Winamp, but that was Windows' fault not Winamp's. Not sure if this is the same problem though, seems like it shouldn't be the same problem if you're right-clicking the containing folder instead of selecting and dragging the contents.

cellular nekomata (a passing spacecadet), Sunday, 6 February 2011 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

I'm on XP, and I can confirm that Windows will do screw-y things with filename order. I use Winamp 5.56 and enqueuing a folder by right-clicking on it always results in odd results. But when I drag the folder to the Playlist Editor window, it always stacks the files alphabetically.

Les centimètres énigmatiques (snoball), Sunday, 6 February 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

^ Yes, but you have to drag the whole folder and not the contents, because if you select the contents then whichever file you select last is "highlighted" in Explorer, which will put it first in the list it sends to the target app (then the other files may appear in reverse order too)

iirc

</nerdy>

cellular nekomata (a passing spacecadet), Sunday, 6 February 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

ironically, at some point during me posting to this thread, Songbird went a bit nuts and placed a Teenage Panzerkorps mp3 in the middle of a Low album in its playlist. which was slightly jarring

cellular nekomata (a passing spacecadet), Sunday, 6 February 2011 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

xp yeah, drag folder, not contents. I'm massively anal about organising my music into folders anyway.

Les centimètres énigmatiques (snoball), Sunday, 6 February 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

it really whips the llama's ass

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic (Princess TamTam), Sunday, 6 February 2011 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

The main advantage of winamp is the ease of finding things in your library quickly, the library sorting and small text interface. The program is almost entirely designed for people who don't like to label/sort their music all the time. But I have never been in a situation where I've wanted to load an entire folder with subfolders and miscellaneous files through My Computer.

However, since my last harddrive erase (and loss of tons of music) I have just stuck with WMP even though I'm not a big fan.

homeless romantic (CaptainLorax), Sunday, 6 February 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, I forgot to say (or think) that I never used the library in Winamp, just the playlist. So if this is a library issue, no idea.

The library sorting and finding is what I like about Songbird, so maybe it is a bit weird that I never even tried Winamp's library in many years of using Winamp.

cellular nekomata (a passing spacecadet), Sunday, 6 February 2011 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

xp and winamp 5.601, using windows explorer as a library. james mitchell's suggestion doesn't work.

a nan, a bal, an anal ― (abanana), Sunday, 6 February 2011 22:52 (fifteen years ago)

three months pass...

winamp classic is still the best - quickest mama unlike the bloated itunes

Latham Green, Tuesday, 31 May 2011 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

Winamp Modern is also pretty zippy as long as you don't use the Media Library. Bento/Big Bento can both shove it though.

got a whole lotta gloves (snoball), Tuesday, 31 May 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

all I know is when I wanna hear "tears before bedtime" the app opens in seconds, I hit "j" and type in the track and voila! there it is. itunes takes so long to open

Latham Green, Tuesday, 31 May 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

I still use winamp more than itunes.

Simon H. Shit (Simon H.), Wednesday, 1 June 2011 04:29 (fifteen years ago)

six years pass...

https://jordaneldredge.com/projects/winamp2-js/

mookieproof, Friday, 9 February 2018 16:01 (eight years ago)

I've been using this a little bit, but mostly because I have all my media dumped into Plex: https://medium.com/plexlabs/introducing-plexamp-9493a658847a

mh, Friday, 9 February 2018 16:02 (eight years ago)

i actually still use winamp at home

mookieproof, Friday, 9 February 2018 16:17 (eight years ago)

same lol

Simon H., Friday, 9 February 2018 16:24 (eight years ago)

I don't have any need for it any more but Winamp >>>> iTunes.

Matt DC, Friday, 9 February 2018 16:27 (eight years ago)

man, I used Winamp up until very recently and it never went wrong. Don't know why I use AIMP now and it's always failing to detect what sound card I'm using (I swap all the time)

Badgers (dog latin), Friday, 9 February 2018 17:00 (eight years ago)

Still using WinAmp 5.61, see no reason to change. It opens quickly, can handle massive playlists, doesn't crash (or at least it's never crashed for me), and does what I need with minimal fuss.

2018 has to be better (snoball), Friday, 9 February 2018 19:21 (eight years ago)

i also still use winamp

although it still forgets to be always on top all the time

adam the (abanana), Friday, 9 February 2018 22:44 (eight years ago)

I want to go back to winamp because aimp doesn't have the mini mode, so I always have to go and find it, and it doesn't understand that if I drag some mp3s in, they should stay in the same order. But where can I get winamp now? The only website I can find doesn't have any download links.

mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Friday, 9 February 2018 23:45 (eight years ago)

winamp 5.6.4.318 for windows installer (inside a zip)

lol @ me

mookieproof, Saturday, 10 February 2018 00:17 (eight years ago)

the minute I post this there will probably be some kind of world-shattering exploit revealed, but until then I feel pretty comfortable saying winamp is a perfect piece of software

algorithm is a dancer (katherine), Saturday, 10 February 2018 01:22 (eight years ago)

winamp was great which means it still is but i haven't looked back from foobar2000.

difficult listening hour, Saturday, 10 February 2018 01:24 (eight years ago)

tried several times to get foobar the way i wanted it and failed; no doubt i'll give it another shot when winamp stops working

k otm

mookieproof, Saturday, 10 February 2018 01:53 (eight years ago)

http://www.winamp.com/ -> "follow this link to get updated news" -> http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=374929 -> second post = download links for the latest version?

StanM, Saturday, 10 February 2018 08:47 (eight years ago)

one month passes...

ok, plex on iphone is actually.. pretty good now?

mh, Monday, 19 March 2018 21:28 (eight years ago)

two years pass...

so i've switched from PC to Mac and I'm having trouble finding a media player that works properly. I just want to be able to play music. I'm not interested in creating a media library or making playlists or any of that jazz. Just want to be able to drag and drop a folder or double-click a file and get it to play.

iTunes - is just fucking awful in every way. It's as though the people who invented it had never understood people's needs. I'm sure last time I tried to use it, it tried to automatically copy all 2TBs of my music collection into low-bit m4a files on a hidden folder on my computer. Also, I never worked out how to get it to play an album all the way through without randomly shuffling to some other tune I played a few weeks ago. Terrible.

Winamp - Ah Winamp. It really kicked the llama's ass back in the day. Easy to use, not fussy about putting things into playlists etc. Just drag a folder into the window and it plays straight through. Sadly doesn't seem to enjoy life on my Mac. When I try to drag/drop a music folder into the window it says the files aren't supported. Lovely.

VLC Media player - Can't go wrong with this? Wrong. If I drag a folder into the window, it doesn't expand into tracks, it just sits there as a folder until I click to expand it. Rubbish if I want to copy a bunch of album folders into it. I've tried all the settings, including one which seems to say it affects this, but it doesn't do anything.

Elmedia Player - insists on showing me the album cover instead of my tracklist. The tracklist comes as an optional floating window which you have to toggle on. Not useful.

In conclusion: Media players are awful and Macs are terrible machines invented by a terrible company who prize compactness over functionality. Somebody help me out here before I lob this over-priced piece of crap out the window and go back to my trusty 2012 Asus.

Specific Ocean Blue (dog latin), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:39 (five years ago)

Clementine?

brimstead, Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:43 (five years ago)

i'll check it! thanks!

Specific Ocean Blue (dog latin), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:44 (five years ago)

"Clementine Quit Unexpectedly"

Specific Ocean Blue (dog latin), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:47 (five years ago)

*Sigh*

And people told me that Macs 'just work'

Specific Ocean Blue (dog latin), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:48 (five years ago)

foobar?

Notes on "Scamp" (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:50 (five years ago)

let's try it

Specific Ocean Blue (dog latin), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:51 (five years ago)

working so far!! :-) thanks!

crikey, that was a saga

Specific Ocean Blue (dog latin), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:54 (five years ago)

foobar is still good yep

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:56 (five years ago)

i mean Apple sucks but it works pretty well for me on the PC

Notes on "Scamp" (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 October 2020 16:57 (five years ago)

I have not touched QCD in decades but apparently it was still being updated as of last year:

https://quintessential-media-player.en.softonic.com/

shout-out to his family (DJP), Thursday, 22 October 2020 17:12 (five years ago)

not convinced that that's a real QCD update

for macs i'd ask elvis telecom what he uses

mookieproof, Thursday, 22 October 2020 17:34 (five years ago)

so I spoke to a Mac expert friend who suggested I really do look into iTunes again and that the functionality, particularly in relation to things like Serato which I use a lot, can outweigh some of its shortcomings.
I've never put my music into libraries, rather I've always kept it in folders which are carefully alphabetised on an external drive and which I access via Explorer (and more recently Finder).
But the idea of chucking all 2TB into a library and risk a jungle of broken/mislabelled ID3 tags does put me off. Will it mess up the already labyrinthine personal system I've cultivated over decades? Will it confuse Serato and mess up its own very finnickity Crate system?
Maybe the wrong thread for this question I guess...

Specific Ocean Blue (dog latin), Thursday, 22 October 2020 22:03 (five years ago)

lol have fun

Give me a Chad Smith-type feel (map), Thursday, 22 October 2020 22:03 (five years ago)

I use Small Player (https://www.igorware.com/small-player) for playing sound files. It's a tiny program, starts instantly. It's great. Just plays stuff and nothing else. I haven't used it much for listening to music for hours on end or anything like that (I do all that in Spotify), so I can't guarantee how it performs. I use it mostly for listening through single mp3/wav files/folders of my own stuff, and it's always worked perfectly for me.

Eyeball Kicks, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 09:58 (five years ago)

Oh shit, I got your PC-Mac switch the wrong way round. Tough luck.

Eyeball Kicks, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 09:59 (five years ago)

Foobar2000 still rules. It can use your folder structure to organise its browser and it's also pretty flood for managing metadata tags. Not sure where the Mac version is at in terms of development.

Noel Emits, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 10:51 (five years ago)

Pretty *good.

Noel Emits, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 10:52 (five years ago)

iTunes - is just fucking awful in every way. It's as though the people who invented it had never understood people's needs.

iTunes (or "Music" as it's now called on macOS) is very powerful and very much geared towards for 'power users' (esp if you use scripting), but indeed it does not cater at all to people who organise stuff by filenames and folders, it's 100% tags. If you don't have your tags correct, then it's useless.

Alternatives on the mac are limited. There's Swinsian and a fairly crappy foobar2000 version (PC version is much better).

Siegbran, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 10:58 (five years ago)

For mass-tagging on the mac there's Yate, Musicbrainz Picard and (if you like command line) Beets.

Siegbran, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 11:04 (five years ago)

Don't know about mac but foobar runs very well under wine in linux and Peter is actively looking for bugs to improve compatiblity

chihuahuau, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 17:53 (five years ago)

people like IINA as a kind of better VLC for mac.
https://iina.io

but just to preview a file, hitting spacebar after selection lets you play it immediately.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 18:06 (five years ago)

three months pass...

toaster plugin suddenly stopped working correctly and i can't figure out why

ffs

mookieproof, Sunday, 21 February 2021 03:19 (five years ago)

one year passes...

Happy 25th anniversary to @Winamp!

The first version of ⚡Winamp⚡ was released as freeware on April 21st, 1997!

⚡🦙⚡

Winamp, it really whips the llama's ass! pic.twitter.com/sLYQUa0g5P

— Daniel Albu (@danielalbu) April 21, 2022

mookieproof, Saturday, 23 April 2022 16:37 (four years ago)

Lol

H.R. MacGufnstuf (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 23 April 2022 16:39 (four years ago)

i always expect more from DJ Mike Llama after that, but he peaked with the Llama Whippin' Intro

Karl Malone, Saturday, 23 April 2022 18:07 (four years ago)

I still use it! Just for double-clicking files in Windows to listen to individual tracks or preview things. I don't use it to organize music or listen to albums or anything. But whenever I double-click an audio file in Windows it pops up and it's somehow comforting that it functions and looks exactly the same as it did when I started using it 20+ years ago.

Hans Holbein (Chinchilla Volapük), Sunday, 24 April 2022 06:11 (four years ago)

it remains my main music player tbh

mookieproof, Sunday, 24 April 2022 06:17 (four years ago)

scrolling back and reading dog Latin's Mac woes, i think i had similar problems when i changed job and settled on Vox, which has worked fine ever since

koogs, Sunday, 24 April 2022 06:52 (four years ago)

I've been using Winamp since the late 90s, and it's still my main music player.

Being cheap is expensive (snoball), Sunday, 24 April 2022 08:04 (four years ago)

My one complaint, which isn't really a complaint to be honest, is that the Media Library is really overspecced for what I use it for - namely managing multiple playlists. It seems like an overly complex early 2000s file explorer, kind of at odds with the main window and Playlist Editor.

Being cheap is expensive (snoball), Sunday, 24 April 2022 08:11 (four years ago)

Foobar 4 life motherfuckers

Number One shlong in Devon (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 24 April 2022 12:00 (four years ago)

three months pass...

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.