The Matrix Reloaded (full spoilers)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
You've been warned. This is where we talk about the movie in detail.

Eventually, anyway. Right now, I'm just wondering why they all wear sunglasses ALL THE FUCKING TIME. The one in-the-matrix scene where Keanu loses them, it's sunny outside. I laughed. Everyone wondered what I was laughing at.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 01:46 (twenty years ago) link

And it's goodbye from me. The lure of this thread would be too much, so I reckon I'll just quit the internet for the next 8 days. Simpler that way :)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 16 May 2003 01:55 (twenty years ago) link

My quick encapsulated review:

Action scenes = great. Freeway = un-fucking believable. Zion = a little too "lower decks of the Titanic" for my tastes. Morpheus = windbag. Dialogue = why did they write all everyone else's lines for Keanu as well?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 02:01 (twenty years ago) link

Good fight scene, lame philosophy lecture. Good fight scene, lame philosophy lecture. Et cetera. Still I thought the ideas hung together with the "plot" a little better than the Baudrillard crap in the first one.

My girlfriend points out that "Milli Vanilla" were k-lame and I'll add that Fishburne sucks.

adam (adam), Friday, 16 May 2003 02:09 (twenty years ago) link

Worse than the first movie, but not by much (meaning that most of the old complaints of the first flick apply here and I didn't have too many new ones). BUT Overuse of CGI resulted in a couple of very ugly almost videogame-ish sequences (both of which--the entire multi-Smith fight and once during the car chase--were mercifully brief--the Smiths were much better when they were just cracking jokes rather than fighting). I don't remember feeling like I was EVER watching Vice City during the first flick. Some glaring and I MEAN GLARING plot inconsistencies concerning "The One's" powers, but eh whatever. The love story was consistent with the kind of epic movie this is aspiring to be and I didn't find it too intrusive. The standard cyberpunk tropes ARE all on full display here (old world spirituality vs. modern technology, fetishism of the other confusingly undercut by white messiah figure, cardboard masculinized female characters, etc) and if these things bother you well generally (like while READING Neuromancer haha) then they will bother you here too.

Overall I thought it was pretty well paced for being such a long film. It was definitely watchable, but if you have no interest in metaphysics/cyberpunk/science fiction than I can definitely see the film being a long road to get through.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 16 May 2003 02:23 (twenty years ago) link

The Smith sequence was pretty seamless until there were fifty of them. Then the effects got out of hand. And to have that scene end with Neo flying away? Why the fuck didn't he fly away to begin with?

Some glaring and I MEAN GLARING plot inconsistencies concerning "The One's" powers

Seeing as how after the first two speeches, I deliberately stopped paying attention to anything but pure visual spectacle, I'm not sure what you mean. Explain.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 02:58 (twenty years ago) link

Um he can stop bullets and fly and do all sorts of other crazy shit so WHY is he even bothering hand to hand fighting these dudes at all (technically this applies to all Neo fight scenes, but I was annoyed by how silly the CGI looked)?!?!

I thought the Smith scene got silly pretty quickly, but whenever I know there will be CGI effects or obvious stunt doubles I always look for them and believe me they were there early on too.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:04 (twenty years ago) link

No, I saw that. I thought it was done pretty well. I spent the first two minutes of that scene admiring how carefully that had disguised the stunt doubles.

And I see... your problem with Neo is the same as mine. Maybe he just likes to kick ass. But the fight scenes, and indeed every moment of dramatic tension, was spoiled by the fact that we know the third movie has the same core cast. Kill Molly? I mean... whassername? Trinity? What a joke.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:08 (twenty years ago) link

And this bugged the shit out me: They named a character Persephone, made her a kept woman, and then had her betray her cheating husband. Isn't that a little obvious?

The lesson here: never name your child Persephone. The same fate will befall her. It's a chicken-egg problem.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:11 (twenty years ago) link

But Alex, there's _always_ going to be CGI effects or obvious
stunt doubles - there's only 1 Hugo Weaving. Are you forbidding
the film makers from inventing impossible visuals cause
"ah, that's gotta be fake" ? Talk about a spoilsport.
For the record, I haven't seen the film yet but just the IDEA
of 50 Mr. Smiths is laughably dumb.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:15 (twenty years ago) link

It's really quite funny. There's this great shot with the looks on all their faces after he flies off. Classic.

Has anyone seen the Hulk preview? Now THERE'S some shitty-looking CGI.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:20 (twenty years ago) link

Hey I said it LOOKS good when they aren't fighting! It's just IF you can't make it look good when they are fighting then the ANSWER is don't do it (or it least don't do it in a way that exposes the glaring inability of CGI to look real)! There is no thrill in watching an obviously computer generated fight each other in a "live" action film for me. It just looks cheap.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:26 (twenty years ago) link

And Keanu looks just as janky and computer generated as Smith during that fight scene btw

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:43 (twenty years ago) link

In a couple fast CGI shots, his face is enlongated so that he looks not unlike James Van Der Beek.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:45 (twenty years ago) link

I really like Harry's review, actually. For the first time ever, maybe.

http://linux10985.dn.net/display.cgi?id=15192

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:50 (twenty years ago) link

“I know you're out there. I can feel you now.
I know that you're afraid... afraid of us.
You're afraid of change. I don't know the future.
I didn't come here to tell you how this
is going to end. I came here to tell how
it's going to begin. I'm going to hang up this
phone, and then show these people what
you don't want them to see. I'm going to show
them a world without you. A world without
rules or controls, borders or boundaries.
A world where anything is possible. Where
we go from there is a choice I leave to you.”


So much promise, so little follow up.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 16 May 2003 03:58 (twenty years ago) link

I figured Neo was just playing with the Smiths really. I never thought at any time during that fight that he had a chance of losing.
Actually, I think the Wackowski (sp?) Brothers realized this too, which is why Neo is completely left out of the freeway scene (best scene in the movie by far).

Vinnie (vprabhu), Friday, 16 May 2003 04:22 (twenty years ago) link

THANK YOU KENAN re: the hulk. I don't want to talk about this with any of my friends, but I am repulsed by the sheer SHITTINESS of the hulk. Good God. I am not going to be able to watch that movie, you know they are going to get the gravity and physics, horribly wrong, the size inconsistent, etc.. Spiderman, now theres some bad graphics. Sorry. Hate those horrible graphics.

tyler (tyler), Friday, 16 May 2003 06:58 (twenty years ago) link

The limpidness of the majority of the expository scenes is obvious, though I have to say that the conversation with the Architext was awesome, not for any of the content but rather the texture of it -- Archie's delivery, rapid-fire and smug, was a sheer aesthetic pleasure (Ebert is very OTM).

Leee (Leee), Saturday, 17 May 2003 02:26 (twenty years ago) link

And a question: why is the "real" world ending? I get that if Canoe Reeves had taken the other door, he'd have gotten the chance to repopulate humanity from scratch, but he chose the other door and what happened? Some sort monkeywrench thrown into predetermined path mumbojumbo?

Leee (Leee), Saturday, 17 May 2003 02:29 (twenty years ago) link

1. This movie takes itself WAY too seriously.
2. Is it me or is the story progressively less engaging as it wears on?
3. Did you also think that Morpheus' speech in Zion was a direct lift (or homage) to Cyrus' speech in The Warriors?
4. Every one of those fight scenes felt extremely perfunctory to me.
5. What's up with all of the important/esoteric characters being minorities? (I'm referring explicitly to the Oracle & the Keymaker.)
6. Just out of curiousity, did you catch the trailer for the Matrix Reloaded after the end of the credits?
6A. Is Hugo Weaving the best thing about this series?


P.S. Good god, yes, the Hulk movie looks to stink worse than a bag of rancid assholes.

JS Williams (js williams), Saturday, 17 May 2003 06:27 (twenty years ago) link

Is Hugo Weaving the best thing about this series?

The true tragic but flawed hero.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 17 May 2003 06:31 (twenty years ago) link

Uh, yes, that is, "Did you catch the trailer for The Matrix Revolutions after the credits?"

JS Williams (js williams), Saturday, 17 May 2003 06:41 (twenty years ago) link

I guess i'm the only one who wanted the fight scenes to get out of the way of the gnostically-charged dialogue.

The Wachowskis did the one thing that they needed to do to keep me from being disappointed. The rest of it was gravy (that could have stood some editing; 'specially the rave with the really boring backing music.)

Was a tad disappointed that they turned Morpheus into an unthinking zealot, though. Had hoped for better in that respect.

And they had Neo fighting 'cause it probably would've been boring to have him talking. That said, i'd liked to have seen more crazy anti-fighting instead of the chop socky action. I'd like to have seen him turn all the bullets into flowers or butterflies or otherwise indicate that fighting him conventionally was useless.

The Superman-esque action scenes, however, were pretty ace.

Not as good as the first, but name a sequel that is.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Saturday, 17 May 2003 13:49 (twenty years ago) link

5. What's up with all of the important/esoteric characters being minorities?

I don't think when there's that many minorities in a movie you can cry tokenism. I don't think I've even seen so many minorities, particularly blacks, in a big Hollywood movie before. It's encouraging.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 17 May 2003 15:28 (twenty years ago) link

even=ever

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 17 May 2003 15:28 (twenty years ago) link

If Morpheus yelled out "can you dig it?" during that speech, that would've ruled so hard.

What really disappointed me was the TOTAL LACK of contemporary super-hep technoid thump traxx to accompany all the kungfulistics. That courtyard dogpile poleaxing scene would've been much helped if it were set to Daft Punk's "Aerodynamic" or something.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 17 May 2003 16:05 (twenty years ago) link

My girlfriend took me to see this last night. I never even saw the first movie. As long as I treated it as something like a comic book made into a movie, I enjoyed it. Some of the dialogue was just preposterous, but I was able to roll with it. Nevertheless, I found my mind going off on philosophical tangents sometimes, which is a pleasant state to be in.

I'm sorry I have nothing more interesting to say at the moment.

Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 17 May 2003 16:41 (twenty years ago) link

Nate is right on. I'm not the biggest techno/idm/whatever fan on the face of the planet, but the music struck me as really weak overall, whereas it fit better in the first one (not that i ran out and bought the sountrack or anything.)

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Saturday, 17 May 2003 17:10 (twenty years ago) link

matrix reloaded, 10 minutes of diverting violence, 6 minutes of cecille b demille pagan orgy, 150 minutes of dialouge trying to prove that its more the anime/chop socky/american comics- the matrix is stupid, boring, shitfest and i was shocked that people bought it, laughed at the right times, displayed awe or shock or something inbetween.

anthony easton (anthony), Saturday, 17 May 2003 17:20 (twenty years ago) link

my gf and i were both laughing at the multiple smith fight scene.
was it intended parody?
overall it was what i expected. a sequel.

kephm, Saturday, 17 May 2003 17:51 (twenty years ago) link

I saw this last night and I was horrified at how awful it was, how cheesy it seemed, and how much it took itself so seriously. The fight scenes were fun to watch, but everything else was stupider and stupider and the stupidest. I was surprised to hear the conversations of those leaving the theatre and how most everyone present hated it. I thought the first one was 100 times better, and that isn't saying much. Xmen2 was like, SO MUCH SO MUCH better and I suddenly appreciate its brilliance now that I've seen this hunk of rubbish known as The Matrix Reloaded. Oh and that rave scene was like a J. Lo video and I had to hide my eyes because I was afraid I'd start laughing.

Mandee, Saturday, 17 May 2003 18:52 (twenty years ago) link

Rave Scene=Britney Spears "I'm a slave 4 U" video.

Mandee, Saturday, 17 May 2003 18:54 (twenty years ago) link

The rave scene was totally Cecille B.Demille, as Anthony said.

I didn't think the movie took its serious content seriously, but maybe that's just because I assumed it couldn't possibly.

Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 17 May 2003 19:54 (twenty years ago) link

why does everyone think it is so ridiculous to take the philosophy stuff seriously? there is nothing particularly silly about it. or is it just the tone?

ryan (ryan), Saturday, 17 May 2003 22:22 (twenty years ago) link

I am starting to think that my actually liking this movie was not the best decision

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 17 May 2003 23:03 (twenty years ago) link

1) Paganisim is overrated. Most of the time you look like an asshole while you're out baying at the moon.

2) There are multiple times where the human manefestations of the computer bits (Architect, Oracle, etc) all say to Keanu something along the lines of, 'I can see what you're thinking!' or 'Your expression tells me you're confused!'. This is so the audience can tell what Keanu should be doing as an actor.

3) Monica Bellucci is hella-hot. Rubber is a good look for her.

4) About halfway through the Architects speech someone in the audience yelled "Fast forward!!!". He was right to do it.

jm (jtm), Sunday, 18 May 2003 05:51 (twenty years ago) link

The soundtrack was pretty dud, but nowhere near as bad as Spiderman.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Sunday, 18 May 2003 07:57 (twenty years ago) link

Belluci has looked hotter. (see: Irreversible and Tears of the Sun)

Leee (Leee), Sunday, 18 May 2003 22:48 (twenty years ago) link

Oh shit... I didn't even recognize her from Tears of the Sun. Mostly because she was hot in that, and not hot in the Matrix. I thought she looked really tired - which her character was.

Maybe Neo can stop bullets beacuse they're ruled by computer-generated physics, but he can't freeze someone in their tracks beacuse they're capable of the same mind-over-matter hooha that he is, just not on his level. That would explain why he has to sword-fight 8 people manual. I mean if you want to start rationalizing... That's like all these negative reviews calling the fight scenes gratuitous and using arguments that result in their jobs as film critics just as unnecessary.

I didn't like the rave scene much either... like what's with these Stomp drums? They have Hoverships and Mechwarriors but when it's time to rock the house they're unplugged all of a sudden. I agree that the soundtrack as a whole was weaker than the first... and DAVE MATTHEWS?! WHAT?!

Stuart (Stuart), Sunday, 18 May 2003 23:18 (twenty years ago) link

I need an editor.

Stuart (Stuart), Sunday, 18 May 2003 23:19 (twenty years ago) link

I agree that there's no reason not to take the philosophy stuff seriously. Actually, I think the architect conversation was my favorite part of the movie. They really did a good job of showing you why exactly the machines needed their reiterating Zions and Ones (haha Zeros and Ones). I think they might have been well-served by a genetic analogy as well as all that Godel (like, if the machines don't periodically have Ones being made who exercise their choice and eventually go back into the Source they'll get stagnant and "inbred"), but they might have consciously left that. If you combine what the guy says in that scene with the fact that the plot arc here is basically suspended halfway (unlike the first one where it was more of a self-contained package with an option for sequel), it leaves room for the resolution of what people tend to be perceiving as flaws and plot-holes (like that they just sort've off-handedly drop the "oh yeah and Zion is all dead and stuff" thing in at the end).

PS: Thank you, Matrix people for not making Donald Sutherland the Architect. I can tell you wanted to, but it's just better the way it is.

Dan I., Monday, 19 May 2003 00:21 (twenty years ago) link

i liked the orgy, there is no reason to assume that religion would be anyless primal.

also keanu is fucking hot.

anthony easton (anthony), Monday, 19 May 2003 00:34 (twenty years ago) link

who knew Keanu would find a vehicle that would make him seem so completely indispensable... and I think My Two Dads has had more compelling cliffhanger endings.

Aaron A., Monday, 19 May 2003 00:39 (twenty years ago) link

Well, My Two Dads had the Evigan. Not many films can boast that.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 19 May 2003 00:45 (twenty years ago) link

This is good too (I bet you'll like it anthony): http://www.corporatemofo.com/stories/051803matrix.htm

although, because it came from FARK I'm sure most of you have already read it. eh.

Dan I., Monday, 19 May 2003 01:24 (twenty years ago) link

Fuck, ILX ate my first entry. And now Nicole has beaten me to be the second chix0r on this thread. (what's up with that?)

I liked it quite a bit. I could pick on the music and the speeches and the acting style in general, but I was happy more than not. Maybe I wanted to like it and that's why I did. I was certainly a bit nervous about seeing it since I'd heard other people's disappointed reviews. I'm not a sophisticated moviegoer, and I guess if you asked me what the point of the movie was, I couldn't tell you. I expected it to be a bridge to the next movie and I think it did a good job of that.

And maybe I'm alone in this, but I think those geek Wachowski boys got the sex stuff just right. I was shocked. I thought the sex scene was really hot, and the rest of the love story very natural and believable. I totally wanted to be Trinity and Neo at the same time, and that's a great feeling.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 19 May 2003 01:29 (twenty years ago) link

That coroporatemofo article is nice and chewy.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Monday, 19 May 2003 01:58 (twenty years ago) link

Hi everyone! Did a movie come out this weekend?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 19 May 2003 02:18 (twenty years ago) link

It was SO good.
I went in hoping for a sequel slightly worse than it's
predecessor, and half expecting a disaster. How wrong
I was! I thought the scene with 100s of Mr. Smith looked
lame. How wrong I was! The movie wasn't flawless, but
as far as Sci-Fi cinema goes, it was truly fantastic.
The exposition in the first half of the movie was slightly
ponderous, but all is forgiven for the effects and the
action scenes - gorgeous sculptures of light of sound.
The dialogue in the original Matrix was too terse and
stiff for my taste (though no worse than any action movie);
the dialogue here was overblown in the extreme - but a
good antidote to the interchangable monosyllables we've
come to expect from these box office killers.

A+!!!!

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Monday, 19 May 2003 02:21 (twenty years ago) link

I went into this movie stone cold sober, and came out
reeling like a libertine.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Monday, 19 May 2003 02:26 (twenty years ago) link

I just hope matrix 3:revolution wont end on a "glorious" shot of a daisy growing out of the carcass of a sentinel @ a sunrise finally piercing the gloom to announce a bingo for the luddites but on a peace/symbiosis of man/machine @ a communist utopia similar to the Culture of iain m banks. I think reloaded hints at the later...
This outcome would make me totally satisfied as a viewer.
heck I wouldn't mind if on top of this they would manage to let the sun shine in, even ;-)

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Monday, 19 May 2003 06:24 (twenty years ago) link

Not as good as the first, but name a sequel that is.

Cannonball Run II, natch.

Overall, I think it was pretty lame. I loved the first one, but Reloaded didn't know where it was going half the time. The fight scenes were neat, but it was about as dramatically involving as watching someone play Tekken. Overall there was too much unnecessary, and pointless development (the 'rave' scene, the 'kid') that could have been shortened or cut completely to make room for some real dramatic developments. The CGI was way overblown at points. I see a much better movie in there trying to claw it's way out.

cprek (cprek), Monday, 19 May 2003 12:05 (twenty years ago) link

Wow, I just saw this movie and I'm still reeling at what a turkey it was. I wasn't really expecting it to be incredibly or anything, but I was startled at how badly they fucked it up. Let me see if I can collect my thoughts.

Okay, for one, how many people here had any idea what the fuck was going on at any given point in the film? There they were, going up elevators, driving around in their spaceship, and the whole time I there was really no narrative impulse. Like, they're going to go get the Keymaster! Great! Why do I give a shit again? Even the set pieces I had really no stake in at all; there was no tension at all! (the closest the movie came was the fight on top of the truck).

And those loudmouths they kept going to see. Really, if you're going to wait forty-five minutes to really start the movie, at least show me something interesting! I mean, really, everybody they ran into seemed to just want to chat for a couple hours. I really couldn't pay attention at all to what they were saying, as I didn't really care at all what was going on. Like, the Merovingian, or whatever he was called; do we really need to hear any more about cause and effect? I felt the first movie was exciting enough that I could sit through that stuff--even though I thought there was a dry spell for the whole middle of the first one where everyone kept discussing the Matrix. I was hoping Reloaded would dispense with that now that everyone's got the idea. Boy, was I wrong.

I also didn't think it look particularly great, especially all that sackcloth Zion shit. The fight with the multiple Mr. Smiths (and why exactly is it cool that there are more than one of him? There were tons of faceless agents in the first one) just looked so shitty, especially Keanu's face. And what about those dreadlocked guys? Were they scary to any one? Intimidating? Did anyone breathe a sigh of relief when they blew up?

Oh yeah, and I really couldn't stop laughing during Morpheus's big speech. He seemed really nervous, and his voice went up a few octaves. And then those Stomp guys! The rave! Shit! What the fuck?

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 02:29 (twenty years ago) link

Dude, the Merovingian is all about Cause & Effect because he has no Free Will! Whoa!

Stuart (Stuart), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 13:11 (twenty years ago) link

Obviously, Zion's full of smelly hippies. Hippies love bongos. You do the math.

Stuart (Stuart), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 13:13 (twenty years ago) link

Hippies were the last thing I was hoping to find there.

Oh, and did anyone else find it funny that Morpheus wasn't the supreme commander of the place? I think he misrepresented himself a little in the first movie--he's just a lowly captain of one of many countless ships, right? Not the impression he gave me...

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 17:36 (twenty years ago) link

Merovingian was an entertaining character. Sure, he was over
the top but so was everything else in the movie. Like I
said, the dialogue was all bullshit but it was interesting
bullshit.
And if watch a Matrix movie expecting a coherent plot-
of course you're going to be dissapointed.

P.S Is there anyone on this board who doesn't hate hippies?
Is this a british thing?

squirl plise (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 00:52 (twenty years ago) link

And what about those dreadlocked guys? Were they scary to any one?

Well, I imagined the Winter brothers as rastafarians for a spell and got pretty fucking freaked out.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 01:02 (twenty years ago) link

Here's the thing: the movie's first forty-five minutes are spent in boring Zion, with most scenes consisting of long conversations about things I'd rather actually see happening. Our heroes finally enter the Matrix, and what do they do? Waste time talking more shit.

slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 01:16 (twenty years ago) link

And if watch a Matrix movie expecting a coherent plot-
of course you're going to be dissapointed.

This argument drives me crazy. I didn't expect a crystal-clear plot, I expected (or at least hoped for) an enjoyable movie that was coherent enough for me to get into it.

slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 01:37 (twenty years ago) link

I loved it and thought it was better than the first

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 01:39 (twenty years ago) link

Like I
said, the dialogue was all bullshit but it was interesting
bullshit.
And if watch a Matrix movie expecting a coherent plot-
of course you're going to be dissapointed.

Hark! Methinks I hear the old familiar cry of the rationalizer, the one who is convincing himself more than anyone else.

We've all been there, right?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 01:39 (twenty years ago) link

sing it Kenan!

slutsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 01:41 (twenty years ago) link

I think he misrepresented himself a little in the first movie--

Unfulfilled promise of The Matrix #117. But who's counting?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 01:42 (twenty years ago) link

5. What's up with all of the important/esoteric characters being minorities? (I'm referring explicitly to the Oracle & the Keymaker.)

This is obvious, no? They're easier to wake up because they have less psychic investment in their Matrix lives - the assumption is as American minorities - than their white counterparts.

Also, Cornel West on the Zion Council = CLASSIC!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 08:18 (twenty years ago) link

for all the talk of "purpose", "causality" etc etc, it's exactly what the movie lacked: the neo fight scenes were really just fx indices, taken to an early - and funny and great - conclusion with the multiple smithseses ie. what vinnie said about why it worked to not have keanu appearing in the freeway battles. the action felt completely without consequence: the paradox of free will (all that ""why why why") can be negotiated through simple harder, better, faster. i mean, yes, in a sense that's all i want from a matrix sequel, but just a semblance of suspend-yr-disbelief protaganist vulnerability would've gone a long way.

other disconnected thoughts: the philosophy parts were less integrated into the movie than the last one, it felt like "okay everyone sit tight, cos here comes the obligatory existentialist bit, but don't worry someone is getting kicked in the face *real soon*". i did like the modernist architect dude tho. he was like an evil colonel sanders. few attempts at charm this time: the oracle is still a sassy elderly black female, that kid with the spoon gave neo the spoon, french ppl are so fucking french you just gotta drive medieval weapons through their hearts. and that's that. oh and the wisecracky smiths i guess. maybe the dreadlocked warhol-entourage phantasm guys. nevermind. the persephone 'sexual tension' bit was horribly forced, some 'truth or dare' dropped into the middle of the film without clear purpose (and then philosophically 'redeemed' with the "such things are not made to last" bit). also, some poor action pacing towards the end, the nuclear power plant blowing up was maybe ultimately a minor plot point, but its also like the most unearned explosion i've seen since like... 'swordfish'. i liked the superobvious neo-christ 'heal the poor' scene, i thought maybe the chance to interesting things with those parallels was ended a little prematurely. the rave scene/nelly video went on a bit long, the whole african-ness/blackness/people-who-wear-black-ness being equated with primal physicality (their machines are all proto-industrial sweaty, churning cog-driven affairs) prob deserves a sneer.

disclaimer: everything i didn't mention above kicked ass. kinda.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 09:25 (twenty years ago) link

one more thing: since the councillor guy is the first non-neo person that we encounter after smith phones himself into zion, i kept thinking that his long conversation with neo about machine-human relations (in which i was semi-convinced the councillor had adopted smith's drawly speech patterns and intonation) was all tension building for the scene that didn't happen where he goes bad abd starts attacking neo. did i just misread this completely or you think it's (partially) intentional?

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 09:33 (twenty years ago) link

I am not British.

Stuart (Stuart), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 16:16 (twenty years ago) link

On the whole, I actually liked it - certainly much more than the first movie - and I wasn't annoyed by the retroactive bolt-on gnosticism kit.

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 23:31 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, yeah, Kenan, but I was expecting to hate it.
I was honestly taken aback by how much I enjoyed it.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:16 (twenty years ago) link

I can't wait to see it... again!

I'm a little annoyed by the dismissive tone of "pop philosophy" in the reviews (for the first one too). I mean, this is philosophy in action for a mass audience!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:20 (twenty years ago) link

I'd agree that the philosophy seemed to be pretty well thought out. And asking why people start kung fu fighting for no reason in the matrix is kind of like asking why people randomly start singing in the middle of a musical.

ejad (daje), Thursday, 22 May 2003 02:39 (twenty years ago) link

I'm a little annoyed by the dismissive tone of "pop philosophy" in the reviews (for the first one too).

Reminds me of the reviews for Waking Life. Critics get very impatient with that stuff for some reason. I still don't get the hostility to any of the stuff said in Reloaded, since I found most of it very compelling. Then again, I read that kind of stuff for fun, so maybe it would be annoying to someone without an interest in it.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 03:32 (twenty years ago) link

Waking Life is like a compendium of stuff I've though about while stoned, and thought was cool at the time, but no so much the next morning.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 03:48 (twenty years ago) link

on _waking life_ as a commarad said :"
One scene in Richard Linklater's "Waking Life" makes a reasonable attempt at introducing the concept of the Singularity, though it focusses more on accelerating progress / evolution than on AI. Transhumanism and volition-based "evolution" are there as well, but it's a fairly oblique approach and you'd probably need some previous experience of the ideas to fully appreciate what the character is saying. Still, it's the first movie I've seen which mentions any of this explicitly.

a transcript of the scene in question; not bad for a two-minute scene:

http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte484v/wakinglife/neohumanguy.html

The rest of the site, including an overview of the film:
http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte484v/wakinglife.html
"

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Thursday, 22 May 2003 04:14 (twenty years ago) link

i'm with ryan...and the fixation on the flaws by most posters above intriguing - is it because you imagined better things happening (i'm not convinced that what Harry Knowles wouldve liked to see would've REALLY made it better...vampires etc. have no real place in the film at that point, tho they may be explored more in The Animatrix as was hinted at in the 'Beyond' episode with the 'haunted house') or you wanted to hate it? i did not want to love it particularly - i walked into the cinema having been exposed to very little hype before this week - and i came out pretty much blown away, tho admittedly feeling a bit stupid (partly for just loving it purely for the aesthetics, fx, technical execution etc.) and partly cos i could not keep up with what French bloke and the Architect were droning on about tho it was actually relevant and key to the fundamental concepts behind the series, in essence.

Neo fighting 100 Smiths was purely for fun, its funny people have such a hard time accepting that. surelt this is in the tradition of martial arts films and anime. it was possibly about honour and respect and a statement of intent by both parties. neither thought there would be a real outcome by fighting, but it was a chance to 'touch base' and showcase what they'd learned...as the Oracle's aide did a similar thing by fighting Neo to 'make sure you were The One' and Neo jokingly replies 'you could've just asked'...but that would've been boring! and if you were bored by Neo vs 100 Smiths then you might just be bored of life...and martial arts tradition possibly.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 22 May 2003 19:29 (twenty years ago) link

I am not bored of life, steve, I am bored of this movie. But thank you for your concern.

Good essay here:
http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/reviews/unloading_on_the_matrix_reloaded.shtml

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:05 (twenty years ago) link

I just don't see how the concept of multiple Agent Smiths is any way exciting or an improvement on the previous movie--wasn't the whole idea that the agents looked more or less the same anyway? So great, they look even more the same now. Big whoop.

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:17 (twenty years ago) link

i absolutely loved it because Agent Smith seemed to literally represent a virus, a germ - multiplied, trying to overwhelm its target, to break it down and destroy it - suspend your disbelief and just enjoy the threat of consumption, of being overwhelmed. of course Neo doesnt flinch, maybe he is too confident...a little gulp wouldve been hideously cheesy probably but he obviously didnt expect Smith to multiply that rapidly so a little sign of being alarmed mightve been nice. although, rather than act like a mindless germ, as i mentioned before, Smith's intention is just to demonstrate his abilities to Neo - Smith's collective nonchalance at Neo's eventual taking of flight as escape route suggests he did actually see this coming, or some outcome other than either he or Neo being destroyed at this point. i find that interesting to think fo it that way. but really the appeal was FUCKING HELL, DOZENS AND DOZENS OF BODIES BEING THROWN AROUND LIKE NOTHING, THIS IS GREAT - pure virtual empowerment, classic videogame thrills taken to their cinematic pinnacle quite frankly.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:28 (twenty years ago) link

it was also very funny because it was so 'dumb and absurd'

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:29 (twenty years ago) link

(doh! this was written before the last two posts)

i actually think the multiple smiths is meant to be some sort of thematic or conceptual point, tho i have no idea what. it's interesting that, finally being "free", he takes it upon himself to reproduce as much as possible, much like a virus (which is what he calls the human race as in part 1). if part 3 fails to develop this then i will be willing to call it pointless.

i didnt really care for any of the action scenes in either of the films, and action in general usually tends to bore me. martial arts stuff needs to be pretty for me to care, and too often in this film it fails to do that. but i really loved everything else, esp the belluci scenes.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:32 (twenty years ago) link

I admit that I liked the second half of the fight a little bit more. Still, when Neo seems more-or-less invulnerable it's hard to get caught up in it.

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 22 May 2003 20:32 (twenty years ago) link

Just tell me there's a scene where all the heroic Agent Smiths finally unleash a can of whoopass on Keanu and leave him snivelling and calling out for his mom and frankly I will sit through a twenty-hour philosophy disquisition on the meaning of laughter in Kierkegaard as conducted by Fishburne, Smith and Moss -- without a restroom break.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 22 May 2003 22:21 (twenty years ago) link

i just saw it again and i take back what i said. the fight in that room with the stairs and the freeway scene are great.

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 22 May 2003 23:48 (twenty years ago) link

I think the multiple copies of the agent smith are there to get our attention back to the concept of simulation, to prepare the viewer to learn that there are multiple perfect copies of the entire matrix who are run for strategic purposes

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 23 May 2003 01:24 (twenty years ago) link

for philosophical fun on simulation and technology I suggest
"how to live in a simulation"
and "the simulation argument"

Sébastien Chikara (Sébastien Chikara), Friday, 23 May 2003 01:27 (twenty years ago) link

multiple perfect copies of the entire matrix

ala parallel universes? i must admit the whole 'this is version 6.0' thing bugged me a bit but its also quite cool - so The Oracle is a program and not an original human as was suggested in the first film, The One is also a Machine concept created to initiate the destruction of version 6.0 of The Matrix after The Architect (a machine himself i guess?) realised that humans in The Matrix were being given too much choice about their lives and there were too many bugs in the system (ghosts, rogue programs like Agent Smith etc.)...so perhaps in the third film Neo may have to resort to his 'original human' self in order to destroy the Machines (for to do anything else would just mean he is following their protocol or something? tho maybe not, as it looks like he wasn't supposed to carry his power into reality and destroy the Sentinel as he did?)?

other things i'm too dumb to work out: the guy who survived and is opposite Neo on the operating table at the end, i missed out on who this guy is exactly somehow. he was the guy on the same team as the one who cut his hand and was gonna kill Neo early on? was this the same guy taken over by SMith in Neo's dream at the start? or was it that ugly bloke himself who was the one Smith took over? so that was not strictly a dream? ack....also is Naiobi (sp) dead or not? i have to see this film again obviously

stevem (blueski), Friday, 23 May 2003 08:32 (twenty years ago) link

I finally just saw it, and with my superpower that turns lame into supercool and awesome (thanks to my epiphany while watching Hypercube), It's a supercool awesome movie! ROCK&ROLL!!!!

A Nairn (moretap), Saturday, 24 May 2003 04:07 (twenty years ago) link

haha so then neo:ctrl+alt+del::the matrix:windows??!

teeny (teeny), Saturday, 24 May 2003 13:42 (twenty years ago) link

Ok, starting June 6th we're going be showing Matrix Reloaded at the IMAX theatre I work at. I have my own doubts as to how good it will look (giant screen films more susceptible to strobing and general wonkiness) and the trailer makes some scenes look even more cheap-CGI than they did in the 35mm theatre--100 Smith fight, the Agent leaping from car to car--but here's what I want to know: Would anybody here actually go all the way to the (often inconveniently located) IMAX theatre just to see the Matrix, you know, really big? I am biased because I have come to hate 70mm film and everything about it but given the spectacular failure of Apollo 13 in IMAX I can't understand the significant financial risk they're taking with this--after the hardcore Matrix nerds see it a couple times your audience is gone and you're stuck with the movie and a contract requiring you keep showing it twice a day. Seems silly to me.

So: does Big Matrix hold any attraction for you? Why? Is it another symptom of American bigger=better OTT-ism?

adam (adam), Saturday, 24 May 2003 13:57 (twenty years ago) link

Re: the ending - is Neo still in the Matrix? How else could he have stopped the sentinels? Surely they would have shown some of the big sentinel attack that's mentioned in the second-to-last scene if it had really happened, wouldn't they? And how does all this fit into the prophecy?

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 17:25 (twenty years ago) link

I took that to mean that the external world of Zion was another layer of the Matrix (which I suppose is what Mr. Architect is talking about in his lecture.)

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 17:30 (twenty years ago) link

I need a transcript of that bloody lecture.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 17:56 (twenty years ago) link

transcript of the wholedamn film is U&K...still confused by the ending am i

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:02 (twenty years ago) link

Architect transcript:
http://www.theantitrust.net/articles/viewarticle.php?articleid=108.

teeny (teeny), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:07 (twenty years ago) link

Thank you so much teeny!

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:16 (twenty years ago) link

*Again, the responses of the other Ones appear on the monitors: "Five versions? Three? I've been lied too. This is bullshit."*

funniest part of the movie

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:21 (twenty years ago) link

Actually, this was my favourite part:

*Once again, the responses of the other Ones appear on the monitors: "You can't control me! F*ck you! I'm going to kill you! You can't make me do anything!*

With all the middle-finger action.

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:21 (twenty years ago) link

"And maybe I'm alone in this, but I think those geek Wachowski boys got the sex stuff just right. I was shocked"

If you've seen Bound this wouldn't surprise you.

David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:23 (twenty years ago) link

The best part of the scene was when the Architect's screens showed the terrible things people are capable of: WWII, Vietnam, Cambodia, George W. Bush...

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:40 (twenty years ago) link

I love to hate when movies have scenes like that. See also: Fifth Element, The Abyss.

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:43 (twenty years ago) link

Yes, it was a bit on the sappy side. Which reminds me...

Slo-mo action + lame philosphy lectures:
The Matrix Reloaded vs Chariots of Fire
FITE

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:56 (twenty years ago) link

If Reloaded had had the Chariots theme over those shots of Trinity falling outta the building it would've been 10X better.

slutsky (slutsky), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:58 (twenty years ago) link

OTM.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Saturday, 24 May 2003 19:02 (twenty years ago) link

Okay, I saw it again last night and liked it even more. The action scenes held up and the plot really snapped into focus. The tricky part for me is figuring out everyone's motivations.

1. So the Architect is the father of the matrix and the Oracle is the mother, right? This is not explicitly acknowledged by the Architect but let's assume so. She has said that she's a program, but she has also said that you can't necessarily believe what she says.
a. So her motivation all along has been to get neo back into the mainframe so that the system can be rebooted (so to speak) and zion can be destroyed. So she's bad?? I say that that was her purpose in the previous five matrices but that she has recently gone rogue for this one...she says in the park-bench scene that 'you've convinced me, Neo' or something to that effect. (this scene has way more useful information than I thought the first time.) I don't see what exactly he's convinced her of but whatever. Still possible that she hasn't gone rogue at all...

2. Mr Smiths. Definitely rogue, explicitly pointed out by lack of earpiece. I'd go for the virus theory as well. He's out to cause trouble, but still has scraps of his prime directive to neutralize Neo. This is the first time such a thing has happened--that is, it didn't happen in the previous versions of the matrix...think back to the scene where Mr Smith drops off his earpiece and then the other three agents come in and fight Neo...one Smith says 'that happened as expected'...the other: 'it's exactly as it was before'...the first: 'well, not exactly'...*evil chuckles.*

3. Merovinginian et al: He is a powerful program who wants more power. By his nature he does not want a disruption in the status quo unless it brings him more power. He has been around for previous versions of the Matrix. I guess that he's making it hard for Neo to reach the mainframe (by keeping the Keymaker captive, etc) because then he'll have to start from scratch. I'm thinking of him as a brilliant industrial baron who could probably build an empire if he was dropped on a desert island naked if it came to it, but he'd much rather keep all the power he's accumulated.

And then the bit at the end where Neo repels the squiddies through the sheer force of his mind or whatever, I'm guessing that somehow he's still in the Matrix. Either the whole of Zion and the scorched world is just another level of the matrix or somehow they took a wrong turn through all those doors and entered a replica of the real world. I'd guess the first option really. Classic sci-fi plot device; leave you wondering at the end what world is really the dream world.

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:04 (twenty years ago) link

What did the chocolate cake do to the woman in white? I couldn't decide if she pissed herself, or had to run off to the bathroom for a wank.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:15 (twenty years ago) link

After swearing I would never waste valuable braincells on any blockbuster film ever again, I was dragged to Matrix Re-Loaded this weekend. It was, as I expected, truely ghastly. The fight on top of the lorry was quite good but if this is the future of cinema (bascially a two hour ILM effects reel) then God help the silver screen and the chance for future Martin Scorsese's to break through...

Calz (Calz), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:21 (twenty years ago) link

EK: remember the last confrontation between persephone and the Merovingian with the lipstick? Having gotten the pretty lady all horny, the M. met her in the bathroom for some action.

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:31 (twenty years ago) link

Great stuff. I need that recipe.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:37 (twenty years ago) link

Also I thought it was pretty cute when the Oracle ate the candy "I just love candy" and the candy was actually the red pill from the first movie. (Maybe this was a hint that she really was revealing the truth.)

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:55 (twenty years ago) link

Either the whole of Zion and the scorched world is just another level of the matrix or somehow they took a wrong turn through all those doors and entered a replica of the real world. I'd guess the first option really.

I think they (or at least Neo) are still stuck at the Merowingian's place because in the Superbowl trailer Trinity says "you give me Neo or we all die right here, right now" to the Merowingian.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Sunday, 25 May 2003 15:02 (twenty years ago) link

The action scenes were good. That is all.

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 25 May 2003 16:46 (twenty years ago) link

1. Keanu as Messiah is a bit of a stretch.
2. Yes, some action scenes were good but even poor Jet Li kung fu is better than Keanu kung fu. Lawrence's kung fu is as bad as Dolemite's but not as funny.
3. The clone cluster fuck fight in the final scene in the Matrix skinny hallway was pretty funny. They all seemed to be dancing in a bad way.
4. The blond dreadheads were pretty stoopit!
5. Was Jada Pinkett really necessary?
6. Why wasn't there more Persephone?
7. Where is Rammstein when you need them?

Roman (Roman), Sunday, 25 May 2003 16:59 (twenty years ago) link

I'll definitely try to stay away from trailers for the next one: as great as the Burly Brawl (millions of Agent Smiths) was, I can't imagine my reaction if I hadn't seen it's later stages beforehand.

As a film, this was quite good. As the first half of a film, it might well be excellent. As an episode of The Invisibles, it's great.

Trinity says "you give me Neo or we all die right here, right now" to the Merowingian

Well, she says it, and someone else (who may or may not sound like the Merovingian) replies. The actual scenes could be at opposite ends of the movie.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 25 May 2003 19:26 (twenty years ago) link

Is now when I confess that I didn't think that first one was that shit-hot and I have no plans to see this one?

luna (luna.c), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:01 (twenty years ago) link

Not really. I suggest you do that in about eight years or so. Pref. in a thread about the films of Steve McQueen.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:38 (twenty years ago) link

Right, ok, I'll file that away.

luna (luna.c), Sunday, 25 May 2003 20:39 (twenty years ago) link

1. This movie takes itself WAY too seriously.

Amen. Something the first one seemed to have going for it was that it knew it was a mediocre but cool as shit looking movie (or seemed to).

Trinity dies but Neo saves her! Just like the first one! Neo catches Trinity just as she's about to fall to her death! Just as he saved Morpheus 30 minutes before!

And the fight scenes seemd to trade a lot of martial arts via pulleys and wires for straight cgi. Bad idea.

Also, Cornel West on the Zion Council = CLASSIC!

Ha, I was expecting a theory on why Neo, the savior, is a pastey white boy.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 May 2003 04:10 (twenty years ago) link

1. This movie takes itself WAY too seriously.

isn't this a requirement of the genre? and isnt it a part of the fun?

ryan (ryan), Monday, 26 May 2003 04:52 (twenty years ago) link

I needed to go to the toilet so badly during the last 15 minutes or so that I couldn't concentrate and now I can't remember how it ended.

toraneko (toraneko), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:44 (twenty years ago) link

It didn't. Kinda.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:46 (twenty years ago) link

I figured Neo was just playing with the Smiths really.

I would've enjoyed this movie so much more if there had been a scene with fifty outraged Morriseys trying to kick Neo's arse.

(bascially a two hour ILM effects reel)

Again, if only! "poison roxx u r all gay", "hahaha not really" and "oh no!!! FITE! oh no!!!" would have really spiced up the dialogue, plus the architect would have explained rockism to Neo.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:51 (twenty years ago) link

I figured Neo was just playing with the Smiths really.

Is it wrong not to always be Keanu?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:54 (twenty years ago) link

Not it's not wrong. But I must ask, how can someone so young kick so much ass?

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:57 (twenty years ago) link

Neo actually puts his hands in Trinity's mammary glands!

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 14:58 (twenty years ago) link

isn't this a requirement of the genre? and isnt it a part of the fun?

It is, but not when it gets bogged down in trying to explain itself. Did we really need anything about the Council in Zion? That was about as exciting as listening to the Councl in the Phantom Menace talk about their policies on intergalactic trade. The plot is about Neo, leave the "how do they recycle their water on Zion" questions for geeky internet messageboards.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:24 (twenty years ago) link

I'm so with you there bnw. Sci-fi movies should forever banned from having Councils. you're right in that so much of Reloaded reminded me of the recent Star Wars movies and their relentless focus on tedious behind-the-scenes pseudo-intrigue that I can't imagine anyone caring about

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:29 (twenty years ago) link

Neo take a, Neo take a bow
Boot Agents of the Matrix in the crotch dear
And don't go home to Zion
Come out and find the Architect (wer ner wer ner)
Come out and find the ArchiTEEEEEEEEEEECT!

Stranger has happened, they could make a musical out of Silence of the Lambs and...oh.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:29 (twenty years ago) link

i didnt have a problem with the 'Zion Council' bits and the digression into things like the waterworks...why should it be out of place in this film as opposed to say a period drama about life and love in the time of irrigated hamlets? they're trying to add weight and depth to the mythology they have constructed around Zion etc. and you can be sure they would've been criticised for NOT trying to expand on the Matrix universe by incorporating useful 'trough' moments for reflection - interludes between the full on action scenes. i do think the whole sex/rave scene was a bit overdone and dragged out but at the same time i appreciate that they were most likely doing this to try and really push home the idea of great power being generated by the humans partying and having sex - cliched and Titanic/Ewok Village reminiscent maybe but still useful to a degree.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:48 (twenty years ago) link

I understand the idea of a nice spectacle and I enjoy a well-made action sequence (I confess to seeing Black Hawk Down twice in the same day) but frankly the increasing use of wires in fight scenes bothers me more than CGI. CGI looks passable-fake - you can tell they're TRYING to make it seamless and as real as possible - but jumping around on wires just looks childish and ridiculous. It's one of the reasons I didn't have a lot of patience for Crouching Tiger..., either.

Top Five reasons I can't hate on this movie:

1. Fighting on top of an 18 wheeler and then crashing it into another 18 wheeler and everything blows up and then the cheesy reaction shot of whatsisface in the ship as Neo rescues them Justice League stylee

2. The idea that the Matrix has people like the Oracle's bodyguard and the french-cursing dude and his wife. The gun with silver bullets and those freaky twins with the butter knives were entertaining, I thought, much more interesting than anybody or anything in the first film (save Hugo).

3. Agent Smith (though he got crapped on in this movie, really. He had the only lines worth remembering from the first installment and this time he doesn't even get to properly explain himself. I do like the idea that he has a manifestation in the 'real world' now. Freaky-deaky.

4. the TV screens showing the alternate reactions of Neo during the Architect blah blah. Proof that the bird is not obsolete.

5. more interesting questions dealing with free will vs. fate etc etc. Much better than the first movie, which was over-obsessed with the idea of the world we live in being fake (LAME unless that was a new concept to you, in which case, I'm very sorry)

Top Five reasons to hate it:

1. Saving Trinity's life inside the Matrix = lame! The flying was okay. The slow-mo endless falling with the bullets etc. was just k-dumb, and they made you watch it like 3 or 4 times. Fucking A.

2. Carrie Ann Moss in black plastic = SO NOT EVEN HOT, dude. Give it a REST.

3. Lawrence Fishburne opening his mouth to say words

4. I didn't have enough hit points when I got to the last Boss and it took me forever to figure out how to beat him, plus I kept getting lost in the Portal, dude, it sucked

5. Sunglasses on everybody is just a little tired. The way the Zionists dress inside the Matrix is completely fucking absurd.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 15:58 (twenty years ago) link

it is utter schlock, i watched it last night.

That said I haven't enjoyed a film so much in ages, an action/sci fi film so much in maybe years. Didn't think it took itself seriously.

I mean come on lots of the fighting scenes border on Tom and Jerry style anvil on head ridicule, it must be intentionally ott. The ending was very poor though and a big deflation after that scene on the freeway which was more exhilarating than anything in the first film as far as I'm concerned.

I hate all the cod psychology and the subtle as a knife in the head anti capitalist messages but I suspect the reason people hate this is because they imagine various wankers they know thinking the Matrix is something more than the most bling bling obscene splurge of special effects and kung fu ever.

It is the benchmark as these in the know types tell me, can you ever imagine watching another god awful gun film again. They had been boring for years. The action scenes are usually the ones I'm bored by. Not in this case for once.


(obviously the rave scene was classic)


Finally am I the only one who thinks the next film is going to reveal how Zion too is part of the Matrix yadda yadda.

(is the ps2 game good?)

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:05 (twenty years ago) link

The ending was very poor though

Would it help if you thought of it as an intermission?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:09 (twenty years ago) link

Dude, that movie SUCKED!

Aaron W (Aaron W), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:11 (twenty years ago) link

Yes Andrew, that's what my co-watcher said and I thought fair point.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:17 (twenty years ago) link

only one week at number one, interesting

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:18 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I noticed it dropped 60%, which is quite a lot. I think the bad word-of-mouth is really going to kill any "legs" this film mighta had. It opened big (but not THAT big), and the first weekend was really bought. They must've had a HUGE marketing budget for that. Joel Silver must be shitting himself.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:25 (twenty years ago) link

The ps2 game is better then the sequel in terms of fun (and its still not that great but worth renting.)

the idea of great power being generated by the humans partying and having sex - cliched and Titanic/Ewok Village reminiscent

An Ewok sex/rave scene... we can only dream,

bnw (bnw), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:28 (twenty years ago) link

it really does look to be this year's phantom menace meaning it'll make a shitload and the fanboys will see it three times but it ain't gonna do what they thought it'd do, but ultimate consensus will be 'well damn, it sucked, huh?'. I've heard enough to know I'm waiting for the dollar theater.

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:31 (twenty years ago) link

I don't think it'll even make as much as Phantom Menace--there'll be less repeat business I think, because my feeling is that the fanboys have really turned against it, maybe even more than they turned against Lucas. I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't the highest-grossing movie this year--which I fer shure thought it was going to be.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:33 (twenty years ago) link

Doesn't the R-rating pretty much automatically handicap it that way?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:36 (twenty years ago) link

oh I can guarantee it won't be the highest grossing film of the year

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:37 (twenty years ago) link

The global, generation-crossing phenomenon that is Daddy Day Care has that all tied up.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:39 (twenty years ago) link

actually I was thinking Legally Blonde 2 (which has to fight that 'middle part of the trilogy' delimma also)

James Blount (James Blount), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:41 (twenty years ago) link

ha!

Actually I heard LB2 was going to be the Empire Strikes Back of the saga.

slutsky (slutsky), Monday, 26 May 2003 16:43 (twenty years ago) link

i wasnt even that huge a Matrix fan, until last Thursday - this second film actually got me more into it than the first one, and in many ways i think its better...but i suppose only in the way Empire is better than A New Hope (i.e. not really, its just because it gets character introductions and plot set-up out of the way and can just get on with excellent actions sequences, some plot development especially the huge twist for the main character that the entire series revolves around etc.)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 17:01 (twenty years ago) link

my feeling is that the fanboys have really turned against it, maybe even more than they turned against Lucas.

Not possible. I was ready to enroll in the French Foreign Legion and raise a militia after seeing Menace.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 26 May 2003 17:30 (twenty years ago) link

teeny I kiss you.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 26 May 2003 17:33 (twenty years ago) link

stevem speaks the truth. I just downloaded all four free episodes of the animated shorts and all of a sudden I give a shit about the series now. I still think the first movie is k-lame, but now the universe is so much more interesting - seriously, I think I may go watch this film a second time, and not just to watch the trucks blow up all over again (I will probably skip out for a pee during the cave-rave, though).

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 18:51 (twenty years ago) link

i'm def seeing it again, and for what its worth, i think Carrie Anne Moss is pretty hot, leather catsuit or sans leather cat suit

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:05 (twenty years ago) link

(explodes)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:08 (twenty years ago) link

this movie fuckin sucked

chaki (chaki), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:11 (twenty years ago) link

its the greatest suck movie ever

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:18 (twenty years ago) link

On a level with The Hidden if you ask me.

Frühlingsmute (Wintermute), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:20 (twenty years ago) link

If anybody does go again you have to count the number of men & women on the Zion Council and tell us if it adds up to 7 men/16 women as the Architect suggests.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:29 (twenty years ago) link

i suppose to have had more appeal it would've had to have been more like Blade Runner (but that would be too sombre and obv. it couldnt just revolve around the one character and his monologues) and perhaps induce a lot more eerie tension ala Alien...is that the main problem for the critics? a real lack of suspense and mystery? its not even that relevant that Reeves, Fishburne and others sometime deliver bad lines in a bad way, or that some bits just look soooo CGI (well duh), but if you think of it as live action anime (which it basically is) then isn't it enough for the film to just obey the rules of the anime genre? and would it not be the best example of anime adaptations (seeing as they all seem to be regarded as dud and inferior to their animated originals)?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 21:31 (twenty years ago) link

None of those are good.

jm (jtm), Monday, 26 May 2003 22:55 (twenty years ago) link

i'm pretty sure its a pisstake...if not then all men should weep

stevem (blueski), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:12 (twenty years ago) link

haha I read that and I was really hoping that guy was real. The 49/50 pretty much seal it as a fabrication, though. What a character, though.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:14 (twenty years ago) link

I saw it again it still kicked ass.
Weird...somehow I don't hate Keanu anymore.
He's actually pretty good now that's he's basically
decided to stop trying to act and intone all the lines
in a "serious" monotone (or maybe that is his idea of
acting), just like you'd _expect_ a cyborg messiah to!

squirl plise (Squirrel_Police), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 02:41 (twenty years ago) link

ok my 2 cents:

The fighting ie the actual real fistwork was sluggish, but the fites were by and large ok, not boring. HOWEVER the thing that had me laughing, like actually really giddy, was the *bink* sound effect (like little-league aluminum bat sound) when Kino tee'd off on one of the Smiths with the pole ripped out of the ground.

However, I HATE the feeling of hearing a mono/dialogue in a movie and immediately needing to imagine ways in which the ideas could have been said better and more deftly and still sounding like things actual people (or rogue bots or whatev) might say to each other. You can't write a character smarter that you are, and I don't think the bros. Wachowski are all that bright.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 04:15 (twenty years ago) link

No good at all. ANd yes Ronan = Zion = part of the Matrix.

I like the way that perhaps Agent Smith is the hero. The only thing that could possibly save it now. Suffers fromt he curse of the dystopian future (everyone is grubby and its shitty but they have flying cars...)

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 09:39 (twenty years ago) link

If there is a One, there will be a Zero. I think.
Probably called Ozer or somefink.

Simeon (Simeon), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:10 (twenty years ago) link

if Zion and the earth surface are also part of the Matrix then i hope the next film doesnt end with the survivors walking into bright light ala Cube and we don't know what they're walking into. then again it would be kinda cool if we never do find out if they've escaped the Matrix or not and their fate is to continue exploring their surroundings once the machines are destroyed (what might also be interesting is if rather than have the machines destroyed entirely, they are able to convince the sentient machines that their existence is somewhat futile when they lack 'soul' and they should just go back to being slaves i.e. take the independent will of the machines away as they took it away from the humans, hopefully creating another moral headfuck, altho it might also be nice if they explore AI more i.e. a lot further than Kubrick/Spielberg did and the whole idea of 'the machine with a soul')

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:33 (twenty years ago) link

One of the key points of the problem of not trusting ones senses is one can never trust our senses. If the plot was to finally create an autonomous, self replicating articficial intelligence then maybe Agent SMith has made that evolutionary leap.

Who says the computers / we have soul?

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:37 (twenty years ago) link

is the ultimate goal of AI to determine whether machines can 'inherit' something as profound and intangible as a soul/spirit? the curiosity seems to eclipse the real need/purpose to do that in accordance with moral issues mapped out over the years, as with cloning humans...but one good thing about The Matrix is it pushes those questions (of which many seem actually quite new) to the forefront unlike any other artefact in pop culture. the films can provide the platform for the writers and directors to pose fundamental questions about existence, as Spielberg does (although he seems more concerned with human/spirituality/religious issues rather than the sheer notion of existence/reality itself)

the possibly great/bad thing about The Matrix is that it may actually kill off the whole 'gung-ho dystopian future sci-fi' genre, taking it to its peak visually if nothing else. there may be a few more Philip K Dick adaptations to be made perhaps, but with The Matrix seemingly aiming to corner the market by encompassing so many divisions (sci-fi, kung-fu, general action) its currently hard to imagine future films being able to match this for thrills alone. certainly they could offer more intricate stories with better characterisation, dialogue etc. and genuine suspense/mystery in a tradition of horror, sci-fi horror and more psychological thrillers (because you're never actually really SCARED when watching The Matrix, unlike Alien or even Event Horzion or whatever). and while stuff like X-Men and Star Wars will be able to survive, what about another 'from nowhere' success like the Matrix happening? have the Warchowskis spoiled it for everyone/anyone else in this respect?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:49 (twenty years ago) link

The only real investment you have in Reloaded is to see where they are going with the story. The stakes seem wholy irrelevant - from Morpheous's messianistic mmbo-jumbo to the Keymaker (where is the gatekeeper?) . We are told they have to save Zion - which they fail to do. They fail hugely, there are now about 20 people left IN THE WORLD (or is it 23?) And I don't care.

I think we will see from nowhere stuff again - of course we will. Its hard to get by the current studio system, but any film which was initially produced by Joel Silver will never be from completely nowhere.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:59 (twenty years ago) link

It's entirely possible that The Matrix couldn't get made now anyway. There's a lot less money falling from the skies than 4 years ago.

They fail hugely, there are now about 20 people left IN THE WORLD (or is it 23?)

No, that was the other door. There's sill a quarter of a million left.
And the movie's not over.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:02 (twenty years ago) link

what about all the humans in the pink pods? are they still alive?

will Neo and the Architect really never meet again as the Architect states?

how will the Oracle appear in the next film as the actress who played her has died?

if the Agent Smith phenomena never occurred in previous matrices, what has changed? and that bit where he says to Neo 'I watched you die...' was interesting, he was surprised Neo was still alive just as much as Neo was surprised Agent Smith was still alive. there must be something in this, especially as it has not been explained HOW Agent Smith survived...has it?

so i eventually figured the guy at the end on the table adjacent to Neo was Bain (i know i'm fick but bear with me)...but is this the same guy who cut his hand and was going to kill Neo in Zion? they look different...and Bain looks a lot like Cypher (some people have been saying it actually IS Cypher) but really it is Agent Smith who possessed Bain's body via the telephone at the start yes? so now one Agent Smith is in the 'mezzanine Matrix' while all the copies are still in the official Matrix...yes?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:15 (twenty years ago) link

Didn't Zion fall? Or just all the ships protecting it.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:21 (twenty years ago) link

No, neither. They have 24 hours left at the end of the film.

Bain is also the guy who tried to convince his captain (to volunteer to follow Morpheus?).

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:27 (twenty years ago) link

I seem to remember someone mentioning that there were still 24 hours left to save Zion.

Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:27 (twenty years ago) link

Bah crosspost.

Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:29 (twenty years ago) link

I cannot fathom the people who say they hated this movie.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:54 (twenty years ago) link

I specifically can't fathom people who say the can't see the point of the Agent Smith fight. Were they watching a different piece of celluloid?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:41 (twenty years ago) link

Neo can bend the Matrix to ridiculous lengths; he can't break it. He fights hand-to-hand if he doesn't have a gun because it's easier to manipulate the non-sentient portions of the Matrix. The one time he did directly influence a sentient part of the Matrix, he created a virus (Agent Smith).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:47 (twenty years ago) link

THANK YOU DAN.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:49 (twenty years ago) link

Dan - how much of that justification comes from you and how much is there in the film. (I fear much much more is the former). The reason it is in the film is because it is quite a cool fight sequence.

What has happened to the hundreds of Smith clones? What does he want with Neo.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:52 (twenty years ago) link

one thing i like thinking about is how much The Matrix follows old video game rules rather than film rules...Neo vs 100 Smiths happens surprisingly early in the film, as if it was the boss at the end of the first level (although Neo had already fought the Oracle's aide just minutes beforehand). often in games the first round boss is somehow linked to the greater adversary you will encounter at the end of the game e.g. the patterns of attack, the very nature of the boss character. it would appear that Neo is to take on the Smith legion again in the next film in some capacity so maybe there's some intention there, a hint at whats to come, as well as just the 'showcase/practice' idea i mentioned earlier.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:53 (twenty years ago) link

The reason it is in the film is because it is quite a cool fight sequence.

but why is it not towards the end? esp. as the fight scenes after are inferior. there are genuine logical reasons for this fight happening at the time it did in the film it would seem - i hope so anyway

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:56 (twenty years ago) link

Why I love the Wachowskis: someone at some point described a world where your senses were artificially imposed, and (I like to think) they thought about it for a second, turned to each other and yelled "super kung fu!".

Both Neo and the Agents being faster than bullets also provides the only good reason ever for a fight to start with guns and end with punching.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:57 (twenty years ago) link

there are genuine logical reasons for this fight happening at the time it did in the film it would seem - i hope so anyway

Yes, there is a reason. It's called pacing a six hour film. These two movies are one long film that is cut in half. They were shot as one film. They were edited as one film. They were written as one film. Therefore, anything that seems inconsistent or unsatisfactory or unexplained, will probably be explained at the conclusion of this one film (esp. seeing as how the wack-owskis are fond of exposition).

jm (jtm), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:03 (twenty years ago) link

Surely Keanu will wake up at the end of the final film and see Bobby Ewing in his shower.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:07 (twenty years ago) link

The logical reason is the previous hour or so in Zion (has that name for the city not come back and bitten them yet) and the previous circular "I know something you don't know" conversation with the Oracle are so boring that we need something to lift us out of it. This fight is not at the end as it is pointless - nopthing is gained by Smith's motivation is a mystery and he isn't strictly preventing Neo from doing anything. (Why is he stopping him going to THE DOOR - never clear).

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:08 (twenty years ago) link

Actually, I figured out what bugs me most about this movie. Yes, I think the plot sucks and it was actually pretty boring, but what really got my goat is the crescendoing sounds of french horns everytime Neo stops some bullets or flys or everytime Trinity jumps out a window. You know what sound I'm talking about. It's like the "whoa, INTENSE" sound.

Mandee, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:14 (twenty years ago) link

The mainframe door? I think Smith's motivation is self-preservation.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:15 (twenty years ago) link

I cannot fathom the people who say they hated this movie.

That shitty shitty dialog (dude, I've read Plato too), the unconscionably horrible soundtrack, and the fact that the movie spent 60% of its time shoring up plot holes -- the 40% action scenes were pretty cool, I'll admit, but that hasn't saved the Star Wars movies from sucking either. I'm convinced that they didn't originally mean there to be a sequel, otherwise this pile would've been enjoyable.

Aaron W (Aaron W), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:38 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, only one week at #1. Only grossed $210 Million in 9 days. Ha.

Stuart (Stuart), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:42 (twenty years ago) link

Pete: my "justification" is all over both of the films! It's all in the fact that in both movies, we only see Neo directly manipulate a sentient being once and that's when he blows up Smith at the end of the first movie; the rest of the time he's fighting hand-to-hand and distorting the physics of himself and inanimate objects.

Smith is trying to stop Neo from getting to THE DOOR because he's trying to kill Neo. If Neo makes it to THE DOOR, he gets away. Surely that was patently obvious...? Why is Smith trying to kill Neo? Because Smith hates Neo and has been trying to kill him since the first movie.

Aaron: In most movies, taking time to explain the world the movie takes place in is looked upon as "exposition" and "character development", not "shoring up plot holes". Really, the only plot hole I can think of was never explained (Where did Neo's precognitive dream about Trinity's shooting come from? How is it that what happened was EXACTLY what he dreamed about?); everything else was consistent with what both movies have presented to us so far (and they might explain the dream thing in the next movie, seeing as they explained the Oracle in this one and she was the only part of the first movie that I had problems with).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:43 (twenty years ago) link

Dan your justification for the justification makee no sense (you're just using induction, just because something has happened in a particular way does not mean that this has happened for a reason). When Neo "destroys" Smith in movie one no mention is made of how hard this is - indeed it is seen as the fruition of his powers. Equally Smith's attacking Neo in the first film cannot be called hatred, he is doing his Matrix defined job. After being resurrected, free himself from his own programmed constraints and with new abilities it would seem less likely that he would want to destroy Neo, as Neo may have the answer to why he is the way he is. Why is he trying to kill Neo - especially as he has now found out (from film one) that this in all likelihood cannot be done. None of what you have said above has been told to us you have mad ethe assumption as to why Neo doesn't use his powers in certain ways merely from observing him not using them, which therefore cannot be used to justify it.

And since the thrust of the initial movie seemed to be to free people from the Matrix, they don't seem to be doing it much (except in a bit of backstory exposition).

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:03 (twenty years ago) link

Equally Smith's attacking Neo in the first film cannot be called hatred, he is doing his Matrix defined job.

But the first film goes out of it's way to point out that he's not just doing his job: he really hates them. The sensual world is having an effect on him.

(except in a bit of backstory exposition).

I don't think you'd be happier if they added another 10 minutes of Neo freeing someone else. I could be wrong.

Though I think the Wachowski's are cheating by using stuff outside the film to fill in gaps: I think the kid who idolises Neo was freed in one of the Animatrix shorts.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:13 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, what was up with that kid? My friend remarked at that point that he felt like he'd missed a couple movies in between (like he was watching Matrix 7)--I guess he actually did if the kid was part of those shorts.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:17 (twenty years ago) link

Dan your justification for the justification makee no sense (you're just using induction, just because something has happened in a particular way does not mean that this has happened for a reason).

Agreed. My hypothesis works, though, and I will stand by it until the movie explicitly tells me something different.

When Neo "destroys" Smith in movie one no mention is made of how hard this is - indeed it is seen as the fruition of his powers.

Don't you see the contradiction inherent in that statement? If it's so easy for Neo to destroy sentient objects in the Matrix, why did it take him until the end of the movie to figure out how to do it? Furthermore, why didn't he hunt down the Agents that ran away and blow them up, too?

Equally Smith's attacking Neo in the first film cannot be called hatred, he is doing his Matrix defined job.

??? Did you sleep through the scene in the first movie near the end where Smith is torturing Morpheus, telling him that humanity is a sickness, that he wished that the machines didn't have to sully themselves by living off of the humans, etc? Smith's entire character is a bundle of xenophobic bile directed at the human race.

After being resurrected, free himself from his own programmed constraints and with new abilities it would seem less likely that he would want to destroy Neo, as Neo may have the answer to why he is the way he is.

At what point in the movie did Smith appear unclear as to what he was or, more to the point, care about what he was beyond knowing the he was a self-replicating virus?

Why is he trying to kill Neo - especially as he has now found out (from film one) that this in all likelihood cannot be done.

He's trying to kill Neo because he hates humanity. He's trying to kill Neo because he didn't finish the job the first time around. Notice that Neo never had to fight off a gigantic swarm of Agents before this movie; it's not clear at all that the right number of Smiths couldn't take him out, particularly if they could keep him from flying.

None of what you have said above has been told to us you have mad ethe assumption as to why Neo doesn't use his powers in certain ways merely from observing him not using them, which therefore cannot be used to justify it.

There's a strong possibility that Neo has been exploding Agents willy-nilly up until this movie and it's only after being confronted by Agent Smith saying, "Thanks for turning me into a virulent virus!" in the playground that he stopped.

And since the thrust of the initial movie seemed to be to free people from the Matrix, they don't seem to be doing it much (except in a bit of backstory exposition).

Deeply unfair criticism; they explicitly say in the movie that they've freed more people in six months than they have in six years and that's what the humans the primary justification for the attack on Zion is. Furthermore, Neo has that kid whom he saved following him around like a mad prohpet, all of those people in Zion keep sending him offerings, at least one of the kids from the first movie has been brought out of the Matrix and is in Zion (hence the spoon), etc. The entire point of the second movie is the setup of the final confrontation, not the (comparatively) mundane tastk of busting people out of the Matrix; we saw how that all worked in the first film, who needs to see it again?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:23 (twenty years ago) link

at least that was fun to watch

I mean, in the first movie there were a lot of great visual ideas--the super-scary shot of the humans in the pods, the telephone stuff, the bullet-dodging--and in reloaded they really didn't come up with anything to match that, or even bother to show us again the stuff that made the matrix universe fun to watch.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:28 (twenty years ago) link

All of a sudden all I can think of is Muad'Dib (Keanu Reeves vs. Kyle McLachlan FITE).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:32 (twenty years ago) link

at least one of the kids from the first movie has been brought out of the Matrix and is in Zion (hence the spoon), etc.

Wouldn't that spoon kid already have been rescued from the Matrix prior to the first film? Wasn't he at the Oracle's house as a potential One? Wasn't Neo's real body rescued before he went there?

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:34 (twenty years ago) link

at least that was fun to watch

And the freeway sequence wasn't?

Anyway, they DID show the telephone stuff and the bullet-dodging, plus they added the ghost programs, the flying sequences and its attended buggering of Matrix physics and the endlessly multiple Agent Smith.

Wouldn't that spoon kid already have been rescued from the Matrix prior to the first film?

That occured to me after I hit "Submit", yes.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:35 (twenty years ago) link

i THINK THAT mORPHEUS IS THEE BADDIE aND IN LEAGUE WIV THEE oRACLE AND aLSO THEE aRCHITECT -- i THINK aGENT sMITH IS a 'gOOD' gUY AND HAS BEEN ALL ALONG!!!!!! (gOOD GUY INSOFAR AS HE HATES THEE MATRIX)

jUST LOOK AT zION, THEE PLACE IS LIKE A JAIL!! WTF, iT SUx0r big-time!!!! zION MUST BE DESTROYED B/C IT IS THE PRISON FOR HUMANz0r! mORPHEUS IS THE FIERY ORATOR WHO KEEPS PEEPS BELIEVING IN THEE CAUSE, WHICH WE NOW KNOW IS FUTILE ANYWAY! JUST DANCE AND FUCK YOU STUPID HUMANGZ, THERE'S NO 'pROBLEM' HERE IN YOUR JAIL!!

HE MUST BE DESTROYED!!!!!

hAHAHAHA CORNEL WEST!

jUST aNOTHER oNE-zERO (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:37 (twenty years ago) link

aND WHAT IS UP WITH THE "RED pILL" THE ORACLE OFFERS NEO??????

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:38 (twenty years ago) link

The Oracle offered Neo licorice. She ate the red pill herself.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link

No, you're right Dan (in places) but I suppose it wasn't the film I wanted to see. I suppose one thing which has hithertoo been left a bit up in the air is the difference between a program being run in the matrix (a la Smith) and the "machines" using the humang batteries. It strikes me that Smith as a self aware pprogramme in the first film must have been torn between the idea that he was programmed to hate humans (which he is pretty much) and absolutely reliant on them (since without humans the need for the Matrix is removed and it will be shut down). Smith seems to me therefore to be an ambivalent third force. And surely he isn't trying to kill Neo, rather take him over (and in the process perhaps gain his powers, and his exit to the outside world and poorly done earlier (poorly done in the film - the connection between the bloke in the Matrix, to the potential assasin is never made clear).

It is unclear what "the machines" will do when they get to Zion. Destroy it, or try to somehow re-enslave them.

I suppose this may be my big problem ith the whole affair now we've got to the second film. There is no obvious reasoning behind the intellignce. Where's the bad guy?

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:40 (twenty years ago) link

Well, they did show us both the telephone stuff and the bullet dodging, but the fact is, it's not as impressive the second time around.

I agree about the humans in pods: it was the standout shot of the first movie. They may have been hoping for the same effect looking down the bore of Zion with all the crossing pathways: nope.

As far as visual spectacle goes, I'll have to repeat myself: irrespective of plot reasons for the Burly Brawl or issues with CGI, if you thought the fight was boring, you were watching a different movie.

(bah crosspost)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:41 (twenty years ago) link

plus they added the ghost programs

You mean Slimer?

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:42 (twenty years ago) link

Andrew I'm with you in re that shot of Zion, which looked like a blurry digitally-enhanced matte painting--a real "so what?" shot.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:43 (twenty years ago) link

All of a sudden all I can think of is Muad'Dib (Keanu Reeves vs. Kyle McLachlan FITE)

Thanks for the thought! I just started wondering why I compared Matrix Reloaded to The Hidden upthread.

Sommermute (Wintermute), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:43 (twenty years ago) link

DIY Slimer x 2.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:43 (twenty years ago) link

Doesn't Smith say something about being 'free' and yet still tied to his programming (destroying Neo)?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:45 (twenty years ago) link

And surely he isn't trying to kill Neo, rather take him over (and in the process perhaps gain his powers, and his exit to the outside world and poorly done earlier (poorly done in the film - the connection between the bloke in the Matrix, to the potential assasin is never made clear).

Color me jumping-to-conclusions but I assume the takeover process is fatal. I think Smith definitely wants access to Neo's powers but it's unclear whether subsuming Neo would leave his abilities intact.

I didn't think the first takeover was handled poorly at all; he kept popping enough at enough intervals to remind the audience that he was still there and still a potential source of trouble. (In fact, the end was a complete anti-climax in the sense that I knew who the survivor was going to be.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:49 (twenty years ago) link

The Muad'dib comparison's not bad, and relates to why the Architect
offers Neo a choice: he can't do what the system needs him to do if his future is locked down.

I like the idea of Agent Smith as anti-hero, and am sort of hoping for that in the next film. Or to be surprised. Which is why I like this film: unlike the first one, I had no idea what the Big Suprise was when I entered the cinema.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:50 (twenty years ago) link

I like the idea of Agent Smith as anti-hero

Straight up hero, surely. (This is about the time I just need to admit I'm a Hugo Weaving fan.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:54 (twenty years ago) link

Oh I assume the takeover process is fatal. But this is a different motivation for wanting to "kill" Neo.

In the end I though poorly paced, poorly organised, little natural flow from the previous movie (starting with a dream sequence / really long flashback/flash forward was clumsy) and the ball park shifted without the average viewer being give the chance to ask why.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:55 (twenty years ago) link

What does the red pill do, anyway, it prepares your body for the shock of not being in the matrix or summat right? So why does the Oracle need it, if she's a computer program?

ALSO!@!!! Totally Agreed re: Agent Smith being the most interesting. SO - fans of the interesting, tell me this: why duz he say "to himself", upon replicating thee guy w/the phone (who we assume he has "taken over" somehow in Zion later?) "It happened just like before." "Well, ALMOST." * grins wickedly *

I thought it wasn't great. Yeah yeah we get another one soon to explane questionZ0r but eh? Are you kidding?? We are talking about THIS ONE! Thee problem was no suspense. In the first one we get Mr. Anderson crouching in his cubicle, or the crew of the Nebuchadnezzar trying not to sneeze, classic farce stuff: I hope they won't find me/us! Nothing like that here.

I think it would be funny if Neo had to go back to thee Matrix every once in awhile to call his Mom. I mean WTF, he doesn't care at all?? Maybe it's all a game, but that's still a real humang being "playing the part" of his mummy!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:57 (twenty years ago) link

Stupid Matrix questions I've just thought up:

1. Where are all the animals? Why don't the computers just use cows for energy, rather than go to all the bother of having to make a fake world for humans?

2. What year was the Matrix set up? I know it represents 1999, but in the real world when was the big war fought? 2020 or something?

3. Okay, so if the Matrix began in 2020, allowing for population growth (even minus casualties of war) plus the way those mechanical brutes breed us, wouldn't there be too many subscribers? Like, if you have more than 6 billion battery farmed humans, there won't be room in 1999 for some of them. What happens then?

4. Also, is it always 1999 in the Matrix. In the real world, in the film, isn't it something like 200 years after that? So they've looped the same year nearly 200 times?

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:58 (twenty years ago) link

Is the room that Neo visits early on after "doing his superman routine" the Oracle's?

It is unclear what "the machines" will do when they get to Zion. Destroy it, or try to somehow re-enslave them.

A bit of both. 23 will be saved. Or, after Neo's choice, not.

I suppose this may be my big problem with the whole affair now we've got to the second film. There is no obvious reasoning behind the intellignce. Where's the bad guy?

If you mean that the simple duality of the first film is part of a Larger Plan, then I don't see that as a problem. But then, I'm still appreciating it as The Invisibles: The Movie.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:07 (twenty years ago) link

Pete is so on the money re Agent Smith.


Anyone want to bet a massive glass of beer (i've just finished work) that Smith will "turn good" in the next one.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:08 (twenty years ago) link

Is the room that Neo visits early on after "doing his superman routine" the Oracle's?

Yes.

I am puzzled about the complaints re: no obivious intelligence behind the machines. Zion is a safety valve for the 1% of people who reject the Matrix; once it gets to a certain size/power level, they inject "The One" into the system to trigger a reboot, where "reboot" means "wipe out all of the dissidents, pick some new breeding stock and rebuild the system. (IOW, the Matrix runs on Windows.) (Haha so there really isn't any intelligence behind it.)

If Smith become a "good guy" I will vomit blood out of my eyes.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:23 (twenty years ago) link

no i don't believe for one minute Agent Smith will turn 'good', what i hope is that the definitions of good and evil in the Matrix will be questioned and manipulated even more i.e. questioning whether truth and freedom are really better than controlled happiness etc. - Agent Smith working purely on his own mandate and terms is great...consider the nature of computer viruses, classed as evil but often created for political reasons i.e. to attack large corporate systems themselves considered evil by the virus authors...alternatively the virus can represent nihilism, as we all feel most viruses and spam is worthless and pointless. if Smith explored these issues himself in a bid to determine what he has now become that would be cool...basically he can fight to determine his own destiny just as Neo and co are trying to do, maybe Smith won't cease to exist nor will he continue to hate Neo - the relationship between these two characters and its possible progression could be the best thing about Revolutions

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:43 (twenty years ago) link

i'm surprised no-one else thinks perhaps the Architect was just lying to Neo all along i.e. Zion IS real and not part of The Matrix...this would be a cop out tho right?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:46 (twenty years ago) link

Yes.

Smith already IS a good guy!!! This is SOOOO obvious!! In the first one he tries to get Neo to reject his "The One" persona and just forget about it: if this happens the Matrix can't get perfecter, the iterations stop, the contradictions/fractal/chaos theory/anomaly/whoo-look-at-the-time whatever-hooey ends up demolishing the system: voila no Matrix. Smith HATES the Matrix, the very smell of it! (Smith is NOT just a program, otherwise what could he possibly have to compare the Matrix with?) Neo gives him the finger early on because Morpheus has been pumping the messiah thing into his brane (which is part of the Master Plan!!) So plan B for Smith = try to stop Morpheus/get the codes to the Zion mainframe, so that Zion may be destroyed in toto. Zion is what ensures the Matrix's continued existence vis a vis its function as safety valve so again, voila, no Matrix. Dunno if Smith particularly cares about the humans he just hates his job: i.e. faff about in the Matrix.

MORPHEUS = GOD OF SLEEP!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:50 (twenty years ago) link

nothing much happens w/Smith in the 2nd movie; nothing much happens with Frodo in the 2nd movie either

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:51 (twenty years ago) link

tracer actually has me kinda wanting to see this movie

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:08 (twenty years ago) link

I have nothing against Smith as an agent of the destruction of the Matrix. If he goes all, "Oh, I guess humanity isn't so bad after all" I will devolve into a chimp and fling feces at the movie screen.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:12 (twenty years ago) link

Fearful!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:17 (twenty years ago) link

(I have inadvertantley caused ILXors across the globe to root for the pussy ending on NO!)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:18 (twenty years ago) link

the best thing would be to forget about notions of good guys and bad guys in the Matrix, as both those concepts are redundant...or at least they could be. it would appear that Morpheus, Neo etc. are just concerned with overthrowing/destroying the machines so they can set about returning things to how they were, imperfect as that system was the idea is humans should be free to determine the nature of their existence and destiny. Tracer makes an interesting point in that Morpheus could end up as the one holding things back but he was misinformed believing they were out of the matrix and Neo was a force independent of the system. might be interesting to see what the destruction of his belief system does to him in the next movie.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:24 (twenty years ago) link

I betcha he just ends up doing some more kung fu fighting

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:25 (twenty years ago) link

Ha, I was expecting a theory on why Neo, the savior, is a pastey white boy.

Well, not entirely...

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:26 (twenty years ago) link

I betcha he just ends up doing some more kung fu fighting

Those agents will be as fast as lightning.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:27 (twenty years ago) link

Morpheus is in with the Oracle and the continuation of the Matrix HAND IN GLOVE, whether he realizes it or not. Morpheus thee God of Sleep (how come Neo has trouble sleeping, and the "elder councillor" is like "that's a good sign" or whatever?? i believe the third movie should begin with 5,000 dempster-dumpsters full of SHOES, DROPPING from a great height) disobeys direct orders and weakens Zion's defenses because the Oracle "might have something to say!" What a hunch! And how convenient that the perpetually bemused "elder councillor" is totally on his side about this!

Fucking Oracle. Costs an arm and a leg and you don't even get the documentation! </EXTREME GEEKINESS>

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:28 (twenty years ago) link

so a hundred years from now when there's ai and what have you and we're living side by side with robots aren't movies like the matrix, terminator, etc. gonna come off as horribly racist (er, humanist)? is hugo weaving the 21st century stepin fetchit?

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:32 (twenty years ago) link

haha at the theater they had a trailer for T3 and it was almost embarrassing, the whole room as one recognized the similarities

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:35 (twenty years ago) link

another thing: what was the flaw with the five previous matrices? its been said the first one created was absolutely perfect - so presumably humans lived in a peaceful utopia...but their subconscious became convinced this was 'too good to be true' so people kept waking up in the pods...to rectify this the Architect integrated features of the 'original construct' (pre-machine war Earth/society) i.e. disasters and wrongdoings, natural or otherwise into the next version...but how we then got from version 2 to version 6 is unclear, and if the problem with version 6 is a combination of too much choice (i.e. the ability to choose freedom from the matrix once persuaded by Neo and co.) then how did they prevent that in previous versions?

another possibility: Neo learns that the reality he was freed from in the first film, our reality, is itself a matrix constructed by a higher power (that would be God then...) and not the machines, so like a fractal the machines were replicating what was already there for humans - a shell within a shell. this might be a bit of a dead end tho, because there would not seem to be a system that makes more sense for humans to live in than this reality...unless, as with the machine-constructed reality, it is not true freedom. the point is, humans are technically no better off in reality than they are in the matrix - they are identical...so will be interesting to see if the next film goes beyond the mere escape from the inner shell back to the outer shell

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:37 (twenty years ago) link

maybe they'll all take acid

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:38 (twenty years ago) link

Versions 2 through 6 are all running the same OS with the Oracle/One reboot patch installed as a service pack.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:41 (twenty years ago) link

Dan OTM.

Reading that transcript that teeny found, it appears that the sentinels are indeed going to kill everyone in Zion, and 23 new people in the matrix will be ejected to form a new one. So, we're probably talking about hundreds of years between versions.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:53 (twenty years ago) link

(It occurs to me that this movie seems to be written for philosophical software engineers more than anyone else.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 17:57 (twenty years ago) link

As was the last one. "So my fighting ability is based on how fast I can think of cool shit, not how much pizza I've just had? Dude!"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 18:02 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, by "this movie" I really meant the whole series.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 18:06 (twenty years ago) link

why do they need 23 humans to form a new Zion/Matrix? why can't the machines just create their own carbon-based units from which to draw power from by cloning, DNA etc.?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 18:50 (twenty years ago) link

and its still very dubious that the two biggest power sources for the machines are humans and, originally according to the Animatrix, the Sun (i thought solar power was a 'pipe dream'?)

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 18:51 (twenty years ago) link

Something else just occurred to me, it's quite random but as long as we're Sherlock Holmesing away here --> first movie: you know those ppl who have come round for Neo, and he has to give them like a program or hack or something. (This is after he wakes up from the "dream" of being contacted by Morpheus and he thinks everything's back to normal. Always Morpheus with the frickin dreams!! "They are sleeping peacefully tonight" he says in the 2nd movie.... ha HA praps Morpheus is in fact a PROGRAM and he can implant dreams in people's headZor!! Dan Perry this is the answer to your precog dream! Morpheus implants the dream about Trinity... ooer but why would he do that.) Anyway the people who come round to Neo's door speak to him as if they do business on a regular basis. And.... they look SERIOUSLY Zionistickal no?? Meaningful glances. The white rabbit on the shoulder. They were working with Morpheus. The gears were already turning to draw Keanu back to the Source, start the reboot, ensure humanity's cycle of bondage..... Anyway this could all wrong but I do think that Zion is rather more of a JAIL for HUMANGS than anything else.

stevem, why "the machines" need the humangs to be anything more than sessile vegetables remains a mystery to me.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 18:54 (twenty years ago) link

At the end of the third movie, Neo and Trinity will pull the mask off of the Matrix and reveal Mr. Macgruder the gardener! ("And I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for you meddling cyberpunks!")

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 18:57 (twenty years ago) link

heh, when Neo entered the souce to confront the Architect, part of me seriously expected the chair to swing round and reveal either:

a) Neo
b) a chimp
c) all of the above

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:00 (twenty years ago) link

TRICK QUESTION: A) and B) are the same!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:05 (twenty years ago) link

it shoulda been alex winter and he shoulda gone 'dude!'

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:06 (twenty years ago) link

and then played air guitar obv.

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:06 (twenty years ago) link

"Your first question, while the most pertinent, will also be the most irrelevant"

"Why am I here?"

entire audience: groans

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:07 (twenty years ago) link

"YOU are number SIX"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:08 (twenty years ago) link

For some reason, I KNEW the question was going to be "Boxers or briefs?"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:09 (twenty years ago) link

it shoulda been alex winter and he shoulda gone 'dude!'

oh my god, best film ever

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:10 (twenty years ago) link

then cut to Agent Smith going 'check it out, i totally possessed Bain!'

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:11 (twenty years ago) link

I just watched Bill & Ted last night and I must say I would welcome a thread about said film that had as much thought put into it as this one.

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:14 (twenty years ago) link

TRICK QUESTION: A) and B) are the same!

That ain't no trick. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:14 (twenty years ago) link

Well, not entirely...

Are you saying there is more then one race to blame for Keanu?

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:21 (twenty years ago) link

I just watched Bill & Ted last night and I must say I would welcome a thread about said film that had as much thought put into it as this one.

http://ilx.wh3rd.net/searchresults.php?board=1&q=Bill+and+Ted%27s+Excellent++Adventure&mode=threads

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:27 (twenty years ago) link

Are you saying there is more then one race to blame for Keanu?

A bit harsh, but I understand the sentiment. ;-) His ancestry is Chinese, Caucasian and I believe native Hawaiian as well. Spencer would be a much better actor/rock star/technomessiah, methinks.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:31 (twenty years ago) link

off to revive!

(x-post)

slutsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 19:33 (twenty years ago) link

maybe get him one of those kidz bop comps and, um, burn me a copy too.

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:10 (twenty years ago) link

if you pass your mouse over the icons on the kidz bop site you can play riffready rock just like pete townshend!

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:11 (twenty years ago) link

haha, wrong thread!

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:12 (twenty years ago) link

Anthony Zerbe sex: We need machines to get along, Neo, DO YOU SEE?

Zion council = 23 people! Do the crazy MATH. Failsafe.

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 21:50 (twenty years ago) link

"is that why there are no young men on the council?" !!!

whoa.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 23:05 (twenty years ago) link

Dig it!!!

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 23:24 (twenty years ago) link

I'm totally with Dan on this (except that Keanu is H-O-T). I don't understand all the hate.

Carey (Carey), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 01:53 (twenty years ago) link

The only scene I didn't enjoy was the unnecessary rave scene intercut with shot after shot of Keanu's ass. After a while I was like, "Okay, I get it, HE HAS AN ASS. Can we show something else now? Oh, guess not."

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 01:56 (twenty years ago) link

huh huh huh "butt-plugs"

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 02:09 (twenty years ago) link

Keanu ass is urgent and key!

Carey (Carey), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 02:31 (twenty years ago) link

It was shit. I had fun. Nuff said.

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 08:19 (twenty years ago) link

watched the first one again last night and it seemed better than before, also actually answered a few questions i had upthread that i was too dumb to remember

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 10:57 (twenty years ago) link

the smith fight made me think of 'come to daddy'. pity that they didn't cgi the backs of their heads like they did the fronts - when they were walking way it was obvious they weren't all the same.

as anyone mentioned the carol vorderman link yet?

good though.

andy

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 18:29 (twenty years ago) link

oh, and the rave scene made me think of ewoks.

andy

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 18:32 (twenty years ago) link

I am disturbed by the percentage of ILE posters who equate unbridled grinding and fondling with Ewoks. Unsurprised, but disturbed.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 18:36 (twenty years ago) link

Y'know, normally I don't notice soundtracks at all - but I did notice this one. I noticed how much I liked it.

I thought the highway scene was really boring and crap and I didn't like the hundreds of Smiths scene either.

Morpheus' speech was so pathetic. He didn't say anything motivating or frenzy inducing, his voice sounded really weak and strained, he had no stage prescence. I don't get it, I though the guy playing the role was meant to be an actor - how come he couldn't pull it off? It was embarrassingly bad.

Keanu = k-hot.

I didn't notice the 23 on the council, 23 choosen to rebuild Zion thing. How many were male and how many female?

toraneko (toraneko), Thursday, 29 May 2003 13:29 (twenty years ago) link

his speech was classic contentless bombast = exactly what 1 would expect from someone whose role is to STOP people from questioning the reality of their jail-like existence; i think the slight strain and stiffness were intended to raise doubts in our minds about his role; in thee first movie he is a mystic renegade visionary, in this one he uses his personal charisma to subvert the defense plans of his own people

dude i think the sentinels are escape pods!! remember when the zionistick leadership is discussing how there's "one for every citizen of zion" and morpheus comes in going "sounds like machine thinking to me" and they're all like "whoa, morpheus, whassup" and forget everything they were talking about; sentinels r gunning for nebuchadnezzar because they neo et al are a DANJUH to mankind

i think the drilling and/or sentinels are sent by humans, alive at the top, taking the upper hand perhaps momentarily in their REAL fight against the machines, and sending down rescue crews to the poor fuckers who are literally living in hell (check out that lava action)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 29 May 2003 18:33 (twenty years ago) link

another kooky theory -- the machines are keeping guard over humans until they learn to take responsibility for themselves -- i.e. neo must prove that he knows how to place love over accomidation which is why the Architect gives him the choice in the first place.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 29 May 2003 18:44 (twenty years ago) link

wait what do we make of Neo stopping the sentinels with his mojo, when he wasn't in the Matrix? He's just a regular dude when jacked out, right? So they're RILLY NOT EVER OUT whoa or he's got some other thing going on.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:04 (twenty years ago) link

or it's a massive inconsistency that needs to be logged and discussed on the appropriate websites.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:05 (twenty years ago) link

either he has become powerful enough to carry his powers into the 'real world', or they are not in the real world (as the Architect informs Neo, tho he might have been lying)...but if the latter then why did he go into a coma? if the Architect somehow 'unlocked' Neo's powers into the mezzanine level of the Matrix that they thought was the real world then maybe that explains the coma as 'teething trouble'

and for fucks sake will everyone stop complaining about how the 100 Smiths fight scene looked so CGI/fake...do you people sit and watch cartoons and go 'oh thats so unrealistic'? come on...

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:11 (twenty years ago) link

the prevailing theory (that I am getting used to) is that Zion is a failsafe Matrix for the 0.01% of humans that don't buy the first one. Thus Neo talks to the Architect, and after having a subconscious realization he turns around and tries to see if he can affect Zion-space the same way he can affect Matrix-space. And indeed he can. Thus floored by the terrific unreality of everything he collapses into a state of catatonia.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:39 (twenty years ago) link

do you people sit and watch cartoons and go 'oh thats so unrealistic'?

Well, at least I can remove my four-fingered white gloves from my hands.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:41 (twenty years ago) link

I don't think that Zion is actually a literal "matrix" -- i.e. that ppl in Zion are actually jacked in somewhere else. It seems a bit too "gotcha" so I think Zion really exists and the ppl. in it are in the "real world" but still in the figurative matrix in that they've been controlled and monitered and etc. by the machines all along.

The reason the matrix needs to be reset is precisely coz that failsafe can't handle neo, and his "anomilies" need to be redigested to make the next version more "perfect".

Think godel's theorem -- as things accumulate, neo is the "godel number" of the system which challenges its w-completeness, so it has to be recreated at a higher level etc.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:47 (twenty years ago) link

The reason the matrix needs to be reset is precisely coz that failsafe can't handle neo, and his "anomilies" need to be redigested to make the next version more "perfect".

So the entire movie cycle is a figurative instance of a guy hunched over his cubicle at 2 am saying, "God, I need to fix these bugs by tomorrow."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:55 (twenty years ago) link

Wait, Ned - Did you see this movie??? I have a theory that you haven't based on what you have/haven't been saying on this thread!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 29 May 2003 19:59 (twenty years ago) link

re CGI quality in the scene w/100 Agent Smiths: they ARE fighting inside a computer program after all!! i doubt the Matrix has EVER had to handle that many polygons and that kind of framerate at once—especially with a virus in the mix, i actually thought it was a neat touch

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:01 (twenty years ago) link

Has anybody else ever noticed that small birds and insects have a terrible refresh rate?

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:03 (twenty years ago) link

That would be neat if it was intended, which I kind of doubt it was. Maybe a General Protection Fault window could pop up in the air.

slutsky (slutsky), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:04 (twenty years ago) link

Wait, Ned - Did you see this movie??? I have a theory that you haven't based on what you have/haven't been saying on this thread!

That's amazing, Spencer! You'll be claiming I don't like Andrew WK next!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:08 (twenty years ago) link

i doubt the Matrix has EVER had to handle that many polygons and that kind of framerate at once

ironically this wasnt the problem, seems people have issues with the quality of modelling and animating itself. i personally have nothing but raw intense love for that fight scene

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:39 (twenty years ago) link

like Andy Warhol (and perhaps the Warchowskis in this case) i am often so enthralled by the concept, that the execution of said concept becomes of secondary importance to realising that concept quickly so it can be 'out there' at the right time

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 29 May 2003 20:42 (twenty years ago) link

But don't modern videogames automagically "de-res" when too much starts happening at once? Ha once you've said "everything in this movie is fake" any explanation becomes possible for anything, especially dumb-ass glitches.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 29 May 2003 22:18 (twenty years ago) link

My cell phone is behaving erratically. I think the world is an illusion controlled by Satan.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 29 May 2003 22:27 (twenty years ago) link

i just can't believe anyone's watching that fight scene, noticing the CGI-ness and deciding its crap as a result. you might as well say all action sequences in video games are rubbish. its still a great action sequence in a film irrespective of that film's other flaws.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 29 May 2003 22:30 (twenty years ago) link

'suspension of disbelief'

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 29 May 2003 22:33 (twenty years ago) link

aka 'the ability to pull shit off'

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 29 May 2003 22:33 (twenty years ago) link

The Smith fight seen was incredible. Those who did not enjoy it were probably paying too much attention to the background: i.e. the fight coreography, at every point, presented specifically appreciable problems of how even a Neo could avoid being hit, and then had Neo resolve those problems in stunning ways. I will say this is a quality with both the Matrix 1 and Fist of Legend, which was by the same guy, though I am assuming Matrix 2 had the same coreographer: but it was entirely gripping in the Smith scene anyway, and exciting as shit. If you actually WATCHED IT.

Hell we're on a music discussion site. Who likes being told the best guitar-solo ever has sloppy finger-work? It's pointless. Get your heads in the game, for real.

As for the rave, it was OK, I say OK, once it became stylish instead of jungle-wierd, like maybe if the sex was not unpleasant that whole segment of the movie would have been pulled off.

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Friday, 30 May 2003 00:01 (twenty years ago) link

Hell we're on a music discussion site.

Er, this is ILE, not ILM.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 May 2003 00:02 (twenty years ago) link

Though I was just glad, really, that the movie exceeded my expectations of every fight being as undramatic as the early fights: even the full trailers showed nothing to suggest otherwise.

But when Morpheus totally fucks the shit out of the ghost guys, and out of nowhere, alone would have made Matrix 2 more intense and exciting for me then 99% of other moview: and as far as reducing it to action/philosophy in minutes, you still get more good action time here then any other American movie can get away with. So that is a stupid complaint.

All in all it was fucking great.

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Friday, 30 May 2003 00:08 (twenty years ago) link

That is why I said 'site' and not 'board'. Take that.

Lastly, you can't go tearing people's code apart when your fighting more than one, let alone more than 99. You're going to get your ass kicked while you sit there.

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Friday, 30 May 2003 00:09 (twenty years ago) link

This was fun typing, I say fun typing, hmm!

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Friday, 30 May 2003 00:11 (twenty years ago) link

get your head in the game Brian

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 30 May 2003 01:34 (twenty years ago) link

which was by the same guy

Yuen Woo-Ping, also responsible for fight choreography on Croughing Tiger Hidden Dragon, and the new Zu Warriors, which will never be shown over here because God hates me.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 30 May 2003 09:50 (twenty years ago) link

y'all need to see this animatrix stuff, no fooling. s'gorgeous.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Friday, 30 May 2003 15:07 (twenty years ago) link

Who is in the Zu Warriors?

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Friday, 30 May 2003 16:42 (twenty years ago) link

mark s to thread, he's got it on VDO tape (tho mebbe has not seen ver Matrix part deux so will not read this thread?)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 30 May 2003 16:53 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.apple.com/trailers/miramax/zu_warriors.html

Stuart (Stuart), Friday, 30 May 2003 16:58 (twenty years ago) link

whoa ho! that looks grate ( = looks just as cheesy as the first one!)

i hope they keep the plot just as incomprehensible

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 30 May 2003 18:00 (twenty years ago) link

so if we buy this stuff about the 23 council members, maybe the councillor was the old neo, version five. the french couple was hilarious; i like gremlins-2-style sequel humour. i stuck around for the preview for revolutions which appeared to be all about a big big fight between smith and neo, being watched by the other smiths - there was an oracle narration on top that made it sound like smith was the key to everything working out... i liked it - the fight scene with all the swords and stuff was fucking great. also the keymaster was adorable.

dave k, Saturday, 31 May 2003 18:53 (twenty years ago) link

did they ever explain exactly what prophecy morpheus was convinced of? obviously something about winning fast but anything more specific??

dave k, Saturday, 31 May 2003 19:07 (twenty years ago) link

Did anyone here not laugh when the Merovingian made that woman's vagina explode?

s1utsky (slutsky), Saturday, 31 May 2003 21:32 (twenty years ago) link

also, what the hell sort of name is the merovingian??

dave k, Saturday, 31 May 2003 23:03 (twenty years ago) link

see above corporate mofo link, though for all I know about european history, it could be total b.s.

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 1 June 2003 02:37 (twenty years ago) link

the merovingians were a line of kings & also a grail-themed holy order of knights.

s1utsky (slutsky), Sunday, 1 June 2003 02:58 (twenty years ago) link

VAGINIMERON

Dan I., Sunday, 1 June 2003 07:27 (twenty years ago) link

NEDuchadnezzar

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 1 June 2003 11:42 (twenty years ago) link

BIIIIIIG dropoff in box office this weekend also

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I noticed. They're in what, fourth?

s1utsky (slutsky), Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:38 (twenty years ago) link

with any luck they'll just ditch the third one and we can be in this state of suspended speculation 4-eva

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:44 (twenty years ago) link

FOURTH!!! - behind Nemo (understandable) Bruce Almighty (slightly understandable) and the Italian Job (wha?!!!) - and the thing is, it ain't like the Italian Job had a big opening.

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 1 June 2003 17:48 (twenty years ago) link

If Zion is not the real world, but instead is another level of simulation that Neo overcomes at the end of the film, could this explain the totally lame Zion scenes?

As well as Morpheus's speech (that Tracer mentions above), the rave sequence was totally rubb...unless...it is meant to represent a questionable 'alternative' lifestyle that is being manufactured for the few who 'live' in Zion (questionable is the key word here - this is why it is done so poorly). Continuing this line of thought, the sex scene was completely lame...unless...sexuality is being used as a passifier to placate the minds of the citizens of Zion and make them think that they are experiencing an authentic reality.

Trinity could also be a passifying program designed to keep Neo down - this would be a plot development for the next film. Alternatively, I could just be making excuses for the poor parts of Matrix Reloaded.

bert (bert), Sunday, 1 June 2003 18:01 (twenty years ago) link

It's like when people tried to convince themselves that the last act of Minority Report was a brilliantly conceived dream sequence.

s1utsky (slutsky), Sunday, 1 June 2003 18:09 (twenty years ago) link

i dont think the rave and sex scene were lame as such, just curiously 'old-fashioned' and too rooted in old cliches you would expect this film/concept with the scope it has to avoid more e.g. Morpehus speech technically fine but just very dated and inevitably cheesy...the sex scene (more of a love scene lets face it) wasnt actually that bad, i got the impression it was all about 'man, imagine having sex with The One!' tho frankly i think i'd rather not

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 1 June 2003 18:56 (twenty years ago) link

That rave bit had been going about seven seconds and I was thinking 'Fuck, this scene's going on far too long it's...wait, it's only a few seconds in, am I being silly....agh it's still going FUCK'.

'It occurs to me that this movie seems to be written for philosophical software engineers more than anyone else.'

As a first year philosophy student I lived with three software engineers whose unsubtle DVD pirating operation allowed me to see the Matrix for the first time.

The many-Smiths scene was kind of like them going 'This is ridiculous and overlong and OH JUST LOOK AT IT! Look at the effects! LOOK AT THEM! Hahaha!'. A bit like that TvGoHome show where a hand holds up a shiny coin for you to stare dumbly at (and that entire last Star Wars thing), but in a good way.

The anticlimactic dreadlock albino twins reminded me of Luke Haines.

The Matrix is supposed to like, send you spiralling into all these big-ass epistemological crises ennit, but I'm probably just gonna lose sleep over the above Morpheus = Evil theory.

Ferg (Ferg), Monday, 2 June 2003 00:25 (twenty years ago) link

I laughed and laughed and laughed until a couple of sci-fi nerds two rows in front of me threatened to set their phasers on "Dork" and take aim at me.
Laughed during the rave/sex scene
when the action was randomly and needlessly slo-moed and we had to wait like thirty seconds to see a bullet go exactly where it was obviously heading. I guess that's what passes for dramatic tension.
when the keymaker says "I'm here because my purpose is to be here." Meaning, "I'm a plot device that miraculously does little to advance the plot."

this was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Everything that was cool about the first one was completely negated by Reloaded. For all the trouble they've gone to to create this credible Matrix-verse, they sure left a lot of loopholes.
Suddenly I'm looking forward to more shitty Star Wars movies.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:02 (twenty years ago) link

slo-mo not necessarily needless - the technique is deployed partly to show off but also to highlight the beauty of actions that often occur too fast for the human eye/mind to fully register and appreciate. the speed of bullets, the fleeting flash of fire that announces each shot fired, rather like the choreographed combat scenes the interplay of slow/fast action can be likened to ballet or other dance-based performance, if nothing else its a useful tool for reminding how epic the story's premise is and how important every action can be potentially i.e. firing shot at Trinity may hit and kill her which might have major consequences depending on Neo's reaction (as it turns out he disappointingly just shoves his healing hands in her and gives her a heart massage i think)

Everything that was cool about the first one was completely negated by Reloaded

how exactly?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:10 (twenty years ago) link

another thought: the rave/love scene tie-in...take it out of its supposed cyber/futuristic context and you could have an exact replica of the scene in a film like Braveheart or similar ie medieval/period epic drama. i bet it wouldnt get laughed at half as much.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:12 (twenty years ago) link

(as it turns out he disappointingly just shoves
his healing hands in her and gives her a heart massage i think)

This reminded me of those psychic surgery scams that were popular in the Phillipines and ridiculed by Penn & Teller.

Everything that was cool about the first one was completely negated by Reloaded

how exactly?

All of the ambience created by the element of the Unknown was lost. By trying to codify what had before simply been overwhelming and nebulous, they trivialized the entire Matrix concept.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:29 (twenty years ago) link

i don't think they did that, unless you accept that as a natural, nay, unavoidable, consequence of doing further installments (which is what it is rather than a sequel as such). and i think to call films like this or even Episode 1 & 2 the 'worst films ever' is more oTT than those who think Reloaded is better than the first Matrix film (which I initially did although admittedly now I hold them in equal esteem). why are things like dialogue and general acting regarded as more important than aesthetics and artistic and technical execution of the film irrespective of its cast? its comparable to the way a lot of music is derided for lame/hackneyed lyrics despite boasting excellent production. perhaps this film is the equivalent to that but then i think it does actually offer something more if not equal to that of a supposedly 'mindless/throwaway' pop song in terms of emotional resonance. the Matrix doesn't have to be construed as mere mindless yarn...nor is it high-art cinema. somewhere inbetween definitely, much like the predicament its leading characters are now in.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 14:58 (twenty years ago) link

I expected more/better.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:03 (twenty years ago) link

we could say the same of your criticisms Horace

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:11 (twenty years ago) link

but you'd be lying.
You don't expect much from me, admit it.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:17 (twenty years ago) link

don't pull that thang out unless you plan to bang

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:27 (twenty years ago) link

why are things like dialogue and general acting regarded as more important than aesthetics and artistic and technical execution of the film irrespective of its cast?

Stevem, I think most people's problem here (or at least mine) isn't neccessarily the quality of the dialogue (it was pretty bad in the first film too), but rather the overabundance of it--the too many long, long scenes of just talking heads, which never gave the movie the chance to build up any momentum. To me this is poor artistic execution.

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 2 June 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link

agreed although i found this to be quite unexpected so the relative novelty of the philosphical monologues didnt really bother me tho i was thinking 'i can't believe they didnt edit this more' during the rave/love scene and Merothingamajig's rant. The Architect scene was fairly well timed and conceived.

i think i'll be sorely disappointed with Star Wars Episode III in perhaps the same way Horace has been with Reloaded - as he said he 'expected more' tho i'm not sure if that means he had ideas that failed to appear in the film or he expected more (and more convincing) character development and less cliched dialogue.

can some parallels not be drawn between Reloaded and X-Men 2 also? both seemed to drift somewhat aimlessly plotwise at times (tho this didnt make them actually boring as you were kept guessing as to how exactly things were going to pan out) partly because it became apparent that both films were trying to avoid certain courses of predictability at least at times and with both involving a wide range of characters, several of whom had very vague alleigances to good and evil (esp. as the nature of what is good and what is evil is challenged refreshingly in both films). tho neither could hardly escape relatively happy 'endings' that amount to 'love conquering all', both follow the model of the middle act leaving several things unresolved and setting things up for the next installement.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 16:14 (twenty years ago) link

Well, I thought both were let-downs--I think you're right with X2 in that the movie was stubbornly trying to chart a different course. While I respect that I think Singer forgot the important shit that needed to be in an X-Men movie, and settled for a pretty lousy, straight-to-video-quality finale.

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 2 June 2003 16:36 (twenty years ago) link

OOOH. Thanks for reminding me that I can now go read the X-Men 2 threads.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 2 June 2003 16:54 (twenty years ago) link

I think in X-Men, it's partly a matter of too many characters for anyone to do anything meaningful.
I only saw The Matrix once, so I'm no expert on it by any means, but one of my favourite parts was guessing at which myth/tradition/movie/book/religion they were plundering at any given moment. There was a similar appeal to the first Star Wars movie.
But Reloaded felt very unfocused to me, the hand-to-hand seemed awful wooden, and the relationships superficial and forced.
Agent Smith was the best part of it, and I guess that's what will take me to whatever the third one is called.
But the Keymaker was very portent for me, in that he admitted he was merely a plot device, something many of the other characters failed to achieve.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 16:54 (twenty years ago) link

i suspect a lot of these criticisms could also be applied to many high-end anime films, but i'm not enough of an expert on that genre to give good examples

stevem (blueski), Monday, 2 June 2003 17:04 (twenty years ago) link

I don't really like anime, so there you go. maybe my appreciation of reloaded is contingent on that.
whatever, I don't begrudge you for enjoying it though, just so you don't think that I think that because I don't like something it's worthless and anybody who likes it is an unsophisticated rube taken in by hot hot hot Monica Belucci.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 June 2003 17:07 (twenty years ago) link

why do people keep saying they laughed at the movie. you laugh at funny things, not things you think you're clever enough to be unimpressed by. word.

as far as the sunglass example that opened this thread, it's badass to wear sunglasses when it's cloudy or indoors, but in bright light what's the point; you look like a tourist. I mean, someone could accuse you of wearing glasses to protect your eyes from glare, and without irony I state that that would be a terrible thing.

parts of this great movie were just awful, and not in a laughable way.

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 00:34 (twenty years ago) link

The anime I like has totally great plot and character shit in addition to bad-ass action and animation.

Cowboy Bebob, episode five, hell yes.

Brian Mowrey (Brian Mowrey), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 00:38 (twenty years ago) link

parts of this great movie were just awful

i love that remark...truly it was awfully great, and greatly awful

actually i am not that big on most anime but i use the strong anime influence evident in Matrix Reloaded to argue it case, bizarrely. live action versions of anime films have been pretty much dud all round haven't they (altho i think Crying Freeman had its moments at least)?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 3 June 2003 00:47 (twenty years ago) link

City Hunter was SO BAD

Dan I., Tuesday, 3 June 2003 00:54 (twenty years ago) link

My God. It was magnificent. Though I am a moron.

There is a preview at the end of the film? Noooooooooooooo! That'll teach me to want a ciggy badly.

I thought the trajectory was less mystical; Morpheus is the mystic boy, and he's revealed to be a patsy, played like a sucker by the Oracle.

Trinity was mighty fine. More than fine. I will fite the One and her husband in real life, because I luv her more than any man could.

Think that many have been hysterical with this; it's Episode I/II redux. Hysteric's reaction is 'This is not it'. Expectations were just too high, hence inevitable come-down. I'm so glad I waited and calmed the fuck down.

Overall - kung-futastic. Thumbs up from me.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 4 June 2003 09:56 (twenty years ago) link

iron lion zion

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 00:32 (twenty years ago) link

stevem if you want to check out some decent live-action 'anime' style films I suggest the following

Attack The Gas Station

The Returner

Resurrection of the Little Match Girl

and of course I love Gunhed as well but they haven't made a DVD of it yet. Frankly I am waiting for the Criterion Collection to pick these up (HA HA).

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:55 (twenty years ago) link

I loved the Teahouse Fight. It looked less like a fight and more like a beautiful dance. Especially that topdown view of Neo & Seraph performing spinkicks. And did anyone else think Morpheus - especially in Zion - sounded & spoke like teal'c in Stargate SG-1?

http://www.frailart.net/members/kodanshi/Hammylet.jpg

N. Ron, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 02:20 (twenty years ago) link

I gotta say, as much as I loved this bitch of a movie half to death the first time I saw it, IT MAKES SO MUCH MORE SENSE THE SECOND TIME.

Mike Stuchbery, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:12 (twenty years ago) link

When Agent Smith multiplies he become The Smiths. Do you (Morri)see!

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:53 (twenty years ago) link

I thought it was more an Attack of the Clones -- (c) Peter Bradshaw (or whoever it was reviewed it for the Guardian)

Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 09:31 (twenty years ago) link

one possibility about Smith's multiplicity...every time he copies himself he loses some of his original strength. probably not the case but would explain how Neo seems to have no less a problem fighting ten Smiths then fighting 100

i went and saw it again and yes it did make more sense. and the teaser trailer at the end looks pretty good, but tho i may have missed them i saw no glimpse of the twins in the next film, bah

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:11 (twenty years ago) link

regarding the story James Blount linked to, it reminds me of how some fundamental Christians objected to Harry Potter for promoting 'dark arts'

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 10:16 (twenty years ago) link

When Agent Smith multiplies he become The Smiths. Do you (Morri)see!

That's not punny.

Nicole (Nicole), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:23 (twenty years ago) link

Wrong, Nicole, wrong! That made me laugh out loud for ages. It therefore (to use an Americanism) "carnstitoots" funny. Very funny.

N. Ron, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:47 (twenty years ago) link

I've seen it ten times now (literally--we're showing it at the theatre I project at--and I'll be seeing it 12 times a week through August) and I like it a lot more now than when I first saw it (though I am surely sick of it).

The talky bits wear really thin, especially the Councillor Haman and Merovingian scenes and the scene with Penelope in the bathroom is drawn out. However the shot where she turns and gestures toward the Keymaker's cell is like the hottest thing ever filmed. I have decided Neo is a program and something is fishy with the Council but I am perhaps Matrixed out.

ps the freeway scene is way too long.

And the credits are ELEVEN MINUTES LONG. ELEVEN. That's REALLY LONG.

adam (adam), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:59 (twenty years ago) link

You're a projectionist?

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:08 (twenty years ago) link

I haven't seen this yet but me and trife will be first in line when it his the Athens dollar theater

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

I am an IMAX projectionist. Like a regular one except bigger.

adam (adam), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 22:30 (twenty years ago) link

i sat thru those 11 minutes of credits to catch the trailer for Revolutions...its just about worth it, even tho it means you have to listen to Rage and P.O.D. beforehand, muahaha

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 22:39 (twenty years ago) link

I am an IMAX projectionist. Like a regular one except bigger.

That is awesome. May I email you and ask a bunch of questions?

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 22:42 (twenty years ago) link

You certainly may. I will do my best to answer them--send it to my good email: aparker5@tulane.edu.

adam (adam), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 22:54 (twenty years ago) link

Persephone, not "Penelope".

N. Ron, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 23:20 (twenty years ago) link

Sorry. Drunk.

adam (adam), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:40 (twenty years ago) link

four months pass...
This would have been so much better without the pointless CGI kung fu scenes.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 19 October 2003 05:08 (twenty years ago) link

The only CGI-fu is the Neo vs many Smiths brawl in the city park, right? An interesting exercise- the CGI is so close to being totally believable but still spottable. I thought the (famous) shot of Neo spiking the pole and accelerating around it was exactly what the whole CGI bizness was for, and wanted more like that.

rob geary (rgeary), Sunday, 19 October 2003 05:30 (twenty years ago) link

I have no problem with CGI- in fact, can't wait to see human mechs vs squid-machines in part three- but what I loved about Matrix 1 was the "authenticity," the fact that like good HK kung-fu we were really seeing the actual actor person whipping out some astonishing (wire-aided) moves. Once you realize the entire person is fake, it sort of takes that aspect away. There are different pleasures to full CGI characters instead, I suppose.

rob geary (rgeary), Sunday, 19 October 2003 05:31 (twenty years ago) link

six months pass...
saw a good chunk of it last night on cable. favorite line is when keanu decides to kiss the french guy's babe.

"Wait. OK."

AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 7 May 2004 14:53 (nineteen years ago) link

738 takes that took

stevem (blueski), Friday, 7 May 2004 14:56 (nineteen years ago) link

It took me an extraordinarily long time to figure out what the hell that sentence was supposed to mean, stevem

TOMBOT, Friday, 7 May 2004 15:30 (nineteen years ago) link

It's an Underworld song title if you look at it right.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 May 2004 15:59 (nineteen years ago) link

three weeks pass...
Just an observation - did anyone else notice that you can totally see through Persephone's dress at the right times in the movie? And that she's not wearing anything else? Like, I can tell exactly what pattern she shaves. I could've sworn I mentioned this before on a Reloaded thread, but I can't seem to find it, so just thought I'd share now.

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 May 2004 21:17 (nineteen years ago) link

*FURIOUSLY RENTS RELOADED*

Leee's a Simpson (Leee), Friday, 28 May 2004 21:40 (nineteen years ago) link

I saw this movie 200 times on a 5.5-story IMAX screen and noticed nothing. GS you are simply toying with us.

adam (adam), Friday, 28 May 2004 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, it was really noticable on the big screen (though, admittedly, my girlfriend was the first one to notice). I watched the DVD, expecting either for them to have edited it out (re Mulholland Drive) or that the quality wouldn't have been enough to see it. But sure enough, it's still there in full glory.

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 May 2004 21:46 (nineteen years ago) link

(xpost) Hold on, lemme see if I can give you some exact timecode for the DVD...

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 May 2004 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

SCREEN CAPS HOMEZ

Leee's a Simpson (Leee), Friday, 28 May 2004 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

1:13:14 (give or take a few seconds)
1:13:41 ( " " " " " " )
1:14:21 ( " " " " " " )
1:14:24 ( " " " " " " )
1:14:30 ( " " " " " " )
1:14:38 ( " " " " " " )
1:14:43 ( " " " " " " )
1:15:07 ( " " " " " " )
1:15:13 ( " " " " " " )

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 May 2004 21:59 (nineteen years ago) link

Basically, from after the kiss scene to when the chateau fight begins, just keep your eyes on her crotch with a decent sized screen. Shouldn't be that hard to spot if you're looking for it.

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 May 2004 22:01 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.savonarolamustburn.com/picture1.jpg

I've also noticed that timecode can vary between different DVD players, so be wary of that. But yeah, this screencap is among the better ones I could get.

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 May 2004 22:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Obviously, such an overt and gratuitous display of the pudendum foreshadows Larry Wachowski's immanent transgender impulses.

Leee's a Simpson (Leee), Friday, 28 May 2004 22:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Do I name the ILXer who thought that the woman was shitting herself (instead of having an orgasm) in the restaurant scene with the French guy?

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 28 May 2004 22:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 28 May 2004 22:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I thought she was having a piece of cake.

Leee's a Simpson (Leee), Friday, 28 May 2004 22:46 (nineteen years ago) link

And then shitting herself.

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 28 May 2004 22:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Does the DVD have any additional Twins stuff? I liked them best of anything in the series. DEEPLY disappointed they didn't appear in the 3rd.

Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Friday, 28 May 2004 22:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Obviously, such an overt and gratuitous display of the pudendum foreshadows Larry Wachowski's immanent transgender impulses.

Or at the very least, a need to dress people in leather or rubber. And nothing else.

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 May 2004 22:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I saw this movie 200 times on a 5.5-story IMAX screen and noticed nothing. GS you are simply toying with us.

And just think, you could've saved us an IMAX frame from these scenes! I still can't believe you missed this - that's just hilarious.

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 28 May 2004 22:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Har. I do have some somewhat-mangled footage from Space Station 3D and Apollo 13 lying around somewhere. I'll ask my old coworkers who were ushers when we showed Reloaded if they've seen this. The screencap above is kind of... crotchy I suppose.

adam (adam), Friday, 28 May 2004 23:39 (nineteen years ago) link

A shameless bump.

Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 29 May 2004 19:39 (nineteen years ago) link

whoa, the hitler cut? how gauche.

teeny (teeny), Saturday, 29 May 2004 22:51 (nineteen years ago) link

four years pass...

I still dunno how ppl hate on this film when it contains the most intense fight/chase/fight sequence ever created. even when you know everything that happens, it still gives the clench. <3 <3 truck kombat.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 4 October 2008 06:54 (fifteen years ago) link

seven years pass...

i rewatched this after seeing it only once 10 or 12 years ago and it is not very good

marcos, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:23 (eight years ago) link

trying to read about the plot and the purpose of neo in these sequential matrix iterations is hurting my brain

marcos, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

the first one has a similar amount of corny bits but it is ultimately a very thrilling and enjoyable movie

marcos, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:25 (eight years ago) link

i never got round to watching the sequels but I caught a bit of the first one on tv the other day and it's in that awkward spot of being old and of its time enough to be egregiously dated but not quite old enough to induce fond nostalgia (caught a bit of austin powers: the spy who shagged me yesterday and it's in that same space in my brain). still a pretty fun film though.

uncle tenderlegdrop (jim in glasgow), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:35 (eight years ago) link

i remember seeing this at a midnight show the night before it opened and it was pretty amazing how the thrills of the first film were completely absent here. i watched the car chase again recently and it was boring. i can't even watch the original matrix now tbh because the ending shot of superman neo just reminds me that his continuing adventures are going to be complete garbage.

nomar, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:36 (eight years ago) link

but you get to rock out to ratm while you ponder the disappointments to come

uncle tenderlegdrop (jim in glasgow), Friday, 18 March 2016 17:37 (eight years ago) link

the first film had a decent amount of humor and keanu was fully charming and the action scenes were scaled to a size that made them palpable and human level as opposed to video game-like.

nomar, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:39 (eight years ago) link

neo and his pals certainly "raged" against a "machine" in this series you might say

nomar, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:40 (eight years ago) link

i'm planning on rewatching the third film soon, i remember absolutely nothing about it except for like neo riding around a spaceship and seeing green code everywhere

marcos, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:41 (eight years ago) link

the action scenes also seemed purposeful in the first movie

marcos, Friday, 18 March 2016 17:42 (eight years ago) link

xp that's pretty much all there is too it tbh

ripple-chested beefchrist (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 18 March 2016 18:05 (eight years ago) link

three years pass...

I still dunno how ppl hate on this film when it contains the most intense fight/chase/fight sequence ever created. even when you know everything that happens, it still gives the clench. <3 <3 truck kombat.

― El Tomboto, Friday, October 3, 2008 11:54 PM (ten years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

truly otm, love and miss u tombot

jolene club remix (BradNelson), Wednesday, 3 April 2019 18:07 (five years ago) link

seven months pass...

good movie

ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Thursday, 7 November 2019 00:39 (four years ago) link

one year passes...

Hadn't seen this since it came out. Tried watching a bit tonight, and you know what? Sucks.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 15 May 2021 00:54 (two years ago) link

seven months pass...

everyone has always been bald

mark s, Saturday, 25 December 2021 13:11 (two years ago) link

no wonder they all have to wear shades then!

calzino, Saturday, 25 December 2021 13:41 (two years ago) link

its just too much

mark s, Saturday, 25 December 2021 13:46 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.