Given his reputation, I'm assuming I've just started at the wrong place. So I thought I'd check: should I try again with The Consolations of Philosophy or How Proust can Change Your Life? I do think he draws some great and insightful connections in The Romantic Movement, and his methodically explanatory tone is one I'm sort of fond of -- it's just that in this case the connections tend to be somewhat easy and underexplored. (Also I love diagrams but the diagrams in this one are so totally k-lame.)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 05:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 05:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― jeskam, Tuesday, 25 March 2003 07:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― Chris P (Chris P), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 08:44 (twenty-three years ago)
...De Botton achieves this bulk with ruthless application and many ingenious devices. Some of these - like filling a fifth of the book with pictures - may strike purists as cheating. But couching each chapter as a literary essay is definitely a good idea, since quotation, especially of poetry, takes up a lot of space. So do capsule biography and paraphrase; de Botton generates almost four pages by rearranging sentences from Robert Baldick's translation of A rebours. And when all else fails, the literary pose gives licence to cod-Proustian long-windedness, replete with 'it is perhaps', 'that which' and the bogus 'precisely'. Here, for example, is how he expresses the notion that things look small from a plane: 'We may know this old lesson in perspective well enough, but rarely does it seem as true as when we are pressed against a cold plane window, our craft a teacher of profound philosophy - and a faithful disciple of the Baudelairean command: "Carriage, take me with you! Ship, steal me away from here!/Take me far, far away! Here the mud is made of our tears!"'...
...Perhaps it's unfair to make fun of de Botton's effusions. They're not meant to be taken that seriously, after all, and a few of his readers might be tempted to pick up the works of Proust or Xavier de Maistre. Why shoot fish in a barrel - especially when they're not doing anyone any harm? At the same time, though, there's something rather chilling about the gulf between what de Botton has to say and the way he goes about saying it. Does a sequence of platitudes really need all that padding? This is how de Botton once put the idea that convoluted language doesn't necessarily imply deep thought:
'It is common to assume that we are dealing with a highly intelligent book when we cease to understand it . . . Yet the association between difficulty and profundity might less generously be described as a manifestation in the literary sphere of a perversity familiar from emotional life, where people who are mysterious and elusive can inspire a respect in modest minds that reliable and clear ones do not.'
'Such prose masks an absence of content,' he remarks a few pages later, offering 'unparalleled protection against having nothing to say'.
― toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 09:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 09:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― H (Heruy), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 10:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 11:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 12:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― nathalie (nathalie), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 12:11 (twenty-three years ago)
(I think this is another example of strange transatlantic misunderstandings, cf US-ers taking Stuart Home seriously. Us Brits are like "AdB has a reputation in the US?!?!" - I blame John Updike, as for most things. I also think US-ers take Martin Amis far more seriously than we do. Which makes me wonder: which US writers do Brits over-rate?)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 13:09 (twenty-three years ago)
Snork! Pfft! Silly Americans!
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 13:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 14:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 15:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:53 (twenty-three years ago)
I also want to mention Botton and editor's tragic and chronic misuse of the comma. Saramago notwithstanding, being European is no excuse for run-on sentences.
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 17:05 (twenty-three years ago)
I don't underrate Twain (I rate everyone precisely how they deserve, obviously!), and I think he is widely considered in the UK to be of the very highest calibre.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 19:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 19:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 20:02 (twenty-three years ago)
ha ha, Mary to thread.
― rosemary (rosemary), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 21:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 25 March 2003 21:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 26 March 2003 03:59 (twenty-three years ago)
Does anyone have any recommendations for Proust translations?
― felicity (felicity), Monday, 5 May 2003 15:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 5 May 2003 15:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― felicity (felicity), Monday, 5 May 2003 15:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 5 May 2003 16:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 5 May 2003 16:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 5 May 2003 17:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 5 May 2003 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 5 May 2003 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― felicity (felicity), Monday, 5 May 2003 21:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Did you guys finish all the volumes? I've finished Sodom and Gomorrah but have yet to crack open The Captive or Time Regained. Although stupidly I went to see Raoul Ruiz's adaptation of the latter (doh!). I'll avoid Chantal Akerman's film of the former until I actually read the book.
― amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 5 May 2003 21:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 6 May 2003 10:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave q, Monday, 4 August 2003 09:09 (twenty-two years ago)
A+ lolz http://www.marksimpson.com/blog/2009/08/11/that-nice-mr-alain-de-botton-can-be-nasty-too/
― caek, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 12:47 (sixteen years ago)
heard the first bit a while ago but second bit good too
Alain – is this OK? v memeable
― conrad, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
haha yes great post
Conrad - is this OK?
― caek, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:47 (sixteen years ago)
; )
― conrad, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:48 (sixteen years ago)
alain de botthurt, morelike
― the shane bourne identity (haitch), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:49 (sixteen years ago)
Somebody's been pressing his bottons, that's for sure
― Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)
really think it should be aw naw, no' annoni oan an' aw noo Tom D.
― conrad, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:57 (sixteen years ago)
Naw, that makes nae sense and is ungrammatical an' aw
― Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
On the hand though: Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw, noo. That works.
― Aw naw, no' Annoni oan noo an' aw (Tom D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:01 (sixteen years ago)
Googling leads me to think you're right, so I've changed aw naw, no' annoni oan noo an' aw to aw naw, no' annoni oan an' aw noo, an' awa noo
― Aw naw, no' Annoni oan an' aw noo (Tom D.), Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:05 (sixteen years ago)
this is OK
― conrad, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 14:06 (sixteen years ago)
I wonder if the 'old-timers' above got hold of the (then) shiny new Proust translations (I guess the overall editor would be the person responsible to focus the army of translators to produce a Proust that was singular).
I was actually looking at the Penguin Arabian Nights set today (125 quid no way ever that would happen!)
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)
what about £75.93?
http://www.media-pricer.co.uk/books/854661/The-Arabian-Nights-Tales-of-1001-Nights-Giftset-by-Unknown-Author
― conrad, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)
This is a bizarre thread to see revived, mostly because I thought I liked this book. I recommend it to people! I re-read part of it last year and thought, yeah, this was a pretty nice book to have read. I'm at a loss to explain the change -- maybe I just expected more out of it while actually reading, and then started to appreciate it more in hindsight.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 22:50 (sixteen years ago)
"this book" meaning The Romantic Movement, obv
― nabisco, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 22:51 (sixteen years ago)
nabisco's been nobbled
― conrad, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 22:54 (sixteen years ago)
They look nice, too.― amateurist (amateurist), Monday, May 5, 2003 12:02 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
So does your mom.― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, May 5, 2003 12:13 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this was a very rude thing to say nabisco, what do you think professor de botton would say, about it, or proust
― max, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 23:00 (sixteen years ago)
ha, yeah, I have no idea why I would randomly have made that joke. it's possible I'd hung out with Amateurist recently in Chicago, so maybe it made sense in some kind of off-board way. (I have never seen Amateurist's mom)
still confused as to what I didn't originally like about Romantic Movement, though, it's totally okay.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)
uh
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jan/26/alain-de-botton-temple-atheism
― bulge renaissance (+ +), Friday, 27 January 2012 10:51 (fourteen years ago)
any atheists who think this would be a good idea?
― bulge renaissance (+ +), Friday, 27 January 2012 11:00 (fourteen years ago)
the barbican is already a temple dedicated to how amazing humanity is, he better not fuck up barbican
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Friday, 27 January 2012 11:05 (fourteen years ago)
scraping de Botton of the barrel as per usual
― summer sun, something's begun, but uh-oh those tumblr whites (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 January 2012 11:06 (fourteen years ago)
with his bible and these plans for a base, he only needs a boat and some celebs to install himself as the L Ron Hubbard for our non-religion
― bulge renaissance (+ +), Friday, 27 January 2012 11:12 (fourteen years ago)
thought The City was a giant temple for atheists anyway tbh
― summer sun, something's begun, but uh-oh those tumblr whites (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 January 2012 11:13 (fourteen years ago)
They already based the design of the O2 on de Botton's head, what more does he want? The rampant ego of the man.
― Derartu Cthulhu (NickB), Friday, 27 January 2012 11:17 (fourteen years ago)
isn't the 02 basically a cavernous empty space oh wait
― summer sun, something's begun, but uh-oh those tumblr whites (Noodle Vague), Friday, 27 January 2012 11:18 (fourteen years ago)
he has a boat. it's currently plonked on the top of the queen elizabeth hall for £350 a night.
― jed_, Friday, 27 January 2012 11:29 (fourteen years ago)
He was on This Week, he doesn't seem to grow any older (or wiser)
― Charles Kennedy Jumped Up, He Called 'Oh No'. (Tom D.), Friday, 27 January 2012 11:43 (fourteen years ago)
<A href="http://ameliatorode.typepad.com/life_moves_pretty_fast/2009/11/going-loco-with-southern-railways.html">Will this man's crimes never end?</a>
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 27 January 2012 12:35 (fourteen years ago)
Oh for the love of god.
Know what you're going through with the formatting A. Just remember to click on the 'show formatting help'
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 27 January 2012 19:28 (fourteen years ago)
I heard about this guy and thought there might be some substance there, then read part of one of his books and found absolutely nothing, and now he's actively pissing me off with this idea
― mh, Friday, 27 January 2012 21:07 (fourteen years ago)
When he first came out I thought, how fresh and clever, but that was very short lived. I blame NPR for getting me all hyped up about him and going out and getting his book. NPR got me interested in the Russell Simmons book too.
― *tera, Friday, 27 January 2012 23:10 (fourteen years ago)
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/culturehousedaily/2014/03/if-alain-de-botton-thinks-museum-captions-can-heal-us-hes-a-moron/
stands, applauds
― lex pretend, Saturday, 26 April 2014 18:11 (twelve years ago)
Naturally, this must have been exactly what Plato was thinking when he introduced us to the philosopher-kings of The Republic. It wasn’t about the running of an ideal state (totalitarian, as we might understand it today), but how best to ensure self-fulfilment for eggheads, that tiresome class of person who can beat you at a pub quiz but whose thoughts and insights are so trite and banal that you wouldn’t want to prop up a bar with them afterwards.
u wot m8? philosophers of antiquity were all about telling people the best way to live. recipes for happiness and all.
― Sébastien, Saturday, 26 April 2014 21:42 (twelve years ago)
http://www.philosophersmail.com/100314-relationships-lawrence.php
AAAAHHHHHHHH
― lex pretend, Monday, 16 June 2014 10:24 (eleven years ago)
why
― conrad, Monday, 16 June 2014 10:41 (eleven years ago)
The Selena Gomez one was super creepy as well.
― Wristy Hurlington (ShariVari), Monday, 16 June 2014 10:45 (eleven years ago)
still my favourite thing on de Botton: http://samkriss.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/why-does-alain-de-botton-want-us-to-kill-our-young/
― ey, Monday, 16 June 2014 10:57 (eleven years ago)
I dunno, on one level I was just "OMG hahahahahah Alain de Botton writing fan fiction about Jennifer Lawrence, LOL but also it's only fan fiction, what's the big deal."
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and it's like... dude, own your fan fiction. Don't try to pawn it off as ~serious thought experiment~ philosophy. The creepy as fuck part is not having sexual fantasies about a celebrity, or even writing them down, it's trying to pawn off your dirty little sex fantasies about a celebrity as ~SERIOUS THOUGHT~ rather than what they are.
However, men seem to do this all the time under the guise of calling it ~literature~ so I don't know why this is so very different.
― you go PUNCHING yourself in... THE DICK! (Branwell with an N), Monday, 16 June 2014 11:59 (eleven years ago)
he really is a grindingly banal fuckwithttp://www.theschooloflife.com/blog/2014/06/the-great-philosophers-6-hegel/
― woof, Tuesday, 15 July 2014 14:49 (eleven years ago)
Hegel has had a terrible influence on philosophy.
better than having zero influence eh Al?
― Daphnis Celesta, Tuesday, 15 July 2014 15:19 (eleven years ago)
woof - Stay Calm
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 15 July 2014 15:34 (eleven years ago)
an inspiring vision of how money can pay for art is to be found in the Florence of the 14th century, even if this period featured appalling attitudes to children and the rights of women.
― everybody loves lana del raymond (s.clover), Tuesday, 15 July 2014 15:46 (eleven years ago)
plenty of great xmas gifts for your deep thinking friends in the school of life shop, i'll be buying a few of these http://www.theschooloflife.com/shop/the-philosophers-jumper/
― Merdeyeux, Monday, 22 December 2014 12:53 (eleven years ago)
Thought this thread update would be about this deep tweet
https://twitter.com/alaindebotton/status/546391442080681984
― Stevie T, Monday, 22 December 2014 13:00 (eleven years ago)
ahaha i just noticed that he's blocked me on twitter, i have never @'d him so i guess he searched for his name, found this vile attack i made on him https://twitter.com/eeeeeein/statuses/489059948576661504, and did the only sensible thing
― Merdeyeux, Saturday, 1 August 2015 23:34 (ten years ago)
lol. you're lucky you aren't up before the beak for slander.
― Fizzles, Saturday, 1 August 2015 23:38 (ten years ago)
i lold at that tweet
― corbyn's gallus (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 2 August 2015 05:39 (ten years ago)
de Botton Bitch
― 2011’s flagrantly ceremonious rock-opera (Bananaman Begins), Sunday, 2 August 2015 15:44 (ten years ago)
all in da butt hole
― flopson, Sunday, 2 August 2015 16:01 (ten years ago)
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2015-08/11/airbnb-alain-de-botton-the-new-art-of-travel
i dont want to think of these people any more
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:09 (ten years ago)
I was going to link to this video of his on London and how its becoming like Dubai but I lasted 10 secs so I didn't.
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:14 (ten years ago)
I read his Proust book a few years ago and thought it was quite good. Although it didn't especially make me want to read any Proust. de Botton himself I kind of regard as being partway between Simon Reynolds and Will Gompertz, ie people who probably know what they're talking about, but whom I'd probably chin for their pervasive brand of everyman-yet-aloof smugness if I met them in real life.
― more side eye than a Picasso (snoball), Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:36 (ten years ago)
get that money and f--- the haters adb
― rip van wanko, Tuesday, 11 August 2015 20:56 (ten years ago)
I'm the A-D-B as you can seeEvery eye, don't you be watching meI don't want no problems cause I put you downIn the ground where you can not be foundI'm just dirt dog trying to make sum bunnySo give me my streaks and give me my honey
― 2011’s flagrantly ceremonious rock-opera (Bananaman Begins), Wednesday, 12 August 2015 12:01 (ten years ago)
v jealous of merdeyeux getting stylishly blocked
― ogmor, Wednesday, 12 August 2015 12:17 (ten years ago)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1654093541543706&set=gm.1613798142242217&type=1&theater
― Upright Mammal (mh), Wednesday, 12 August 2015 18:05 (ten years ago)
i really think there was some utility in the Skeptic Movement as a mainstream voice critiquing concepts like "wellness" but i guess the feel better industrial complex comes for us all pic.twitter.com/iO22vpvN8l— worm (@SzMarsupial) January 24, 2020
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 24 January 2020 16:06 (six years ago)
if there was a big bomb at this event i would feel better
― GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Friday, 24 January 2020 16:20 (six years ago)
'It's called a "gong bath," and despite the name, there is no water or nudity involved. Instead, a group of people lie on the ground while a shaman-like leader bangs gongs over you.'
― I have not yet begun to fart (rip van wanko), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:13 (six years ago)
i know there are worse people on that list but bill bryson really grinds my gears.
― Fizzles, Friday, 24 January 2020 17:46 (six years ago)
Yeah I've never got him - or rather I do get him and that's why I hate him - but recently a friend of mine who liked his early work told me he's got really hateful in his dotage
― GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:48 (six years ago)
When's the moment Bryson became bad? I think it was maybe when he came back to Britain in like 2001
― opden gnash (imago), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:49 (six years ago)
he has always been bad but idk when he started upsetting his former fans
― GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:51 (six years ago)
When I was 13 his stuff was hilarious so former fans had better include a childhood caveat
― opden gnash (imago), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:54 (six years ago)
my theory is Stuart Maconie co-opted his twee pie and mash bullshit so he had to stake out new turf as an angry, angry man
― GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:55 (six years ago)
I haven't read Bryson in adulthood obv
Maconie is Cardiacs' man on the inside, leave him be haha
― opden gnash (imago), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:56 (six years ago)
what is bryson angry about? bathroom warrior? anti-pc?
― bidenfan69420 (jim in vancouver), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:57 (six years ago)
litter
― mfktz (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Friday, 24 January 2020 17:58 (six years ago)
british people do litter terribly tbh bryson otm.
― bidenfan69420 (jim in vancouver), Friday, 24 January 2020 18:00 (six years ago)
That looks like hell on Earth.
― Frozen Mug (Tom D.), Friday, 24 January 2020 18:10 (six years ago)
needs more Paul McKenna
― GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Friday, 24 January 2020 18:15 (six years ago)
it's Sedaris who's angry about Brit litter, isn't it? He goes out on the verges with a grabber. Maybe Bryson is too. Anyway, balls to de Botton, I fart in his gong bath.
― fetter, Friday, 24 January 2020 18:18 (six years ago)
Playing with the idea of showing that picture to my yoga teacher.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 24 January 2020 18:19 (six years ago)
Many yoga studios put the occasional gong bath session. I despair.
Also wtf is a pop-up podcast
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 24 January 2020 18:20 (six years ago)
I've always fancied a gong bath tbh altho not within a gazillion miles of these choads
― GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Friday, 24 January 2020 18:22 (six years ago)
I'm told by a couple of people in my class that it's a nice thing but just wouldn't care for it.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 24 January 2020 18:28 (six years ago)
i wouldn't mind standing in front of that big gong in the rank films thing with some ear plugs in while the gongman gives it a lash
― bidenfan69420 (jim in vancouver), Friday, 24 January 2020 18:31 (six years ago)
I like big gongs and I cannot lie
I once went to a music class for working with SEN children and the guy had a huge chime bar, like the size of a coffin. When he hit it you felt the sound waves fill the room, right thru your chest, it was brilliant
― GK Chessington's World of Adventure (Noodle Vague), Friday, 24 January 2020 18:33 (six years ago)
that sounds great. better than a gong imo
― bidenfan69420 (jim in vancouver), Friday, 24 January 2020 18:34 (six years ago)
Having recently watched Eddie Prevost playing a gong with an electric toothbrush I am here to tell you gongs are awesome.
― Frozen Mug (Tom D.), Friday, 24 January 2020 18:36 (six years ago)
that barbican event belongs on Real England imo
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 25 January 2020 22:46 (six years ago)