― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 01:56 (twenty-one years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 01:57 (twenty-one years ago) link
oh i definitely became aware of all these things, but again i got it through someone else's media filter because i discovered electronic music through the Prodigy/Chems 'Electronica' push, which mostly left out jungle (though i discovered it very shortly afterwards).
my point was that it's kind of ironic that a big part of what appealed to a North American teenager (me) about Britpop was the idea that even the 'laddish' and populist side of British culture seemed more intelligent and alive than my own (eg. lots of grunge leftovers; no rap or electronic music on suburban radar screen quite yet). now i see my affinity for Britpop as the kind of low-Other fetishizing of foreign culture that Edward 'Orientalism' Said had a field day with. meanwhile, the people who lived through Britpop detested much of it, and perhaps rightly so. all i want is to go back to my fantasy London!
― Dave M. (rotten03), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 02:11 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 02:25 (twenty-one years ago) link
GH: Those ravers came from council estates (Carl Cox, Deja Vu/Dub Pistols one estate specifically, Rounshaw in Carshalton) and worked the door on the Cafe de Paris (my first flatmate, who also worked at Tony Coulston-Hayter hangar raves screamed about in The Sun) before going out to Spain and making balearic; they were soul boys on their strain of American urban imports. Soul II Soul, hello? Massive Attack and the whole Bristol colonial legacy? E came into London cheers to a torch singer initials MA and granny's fave BG who had a friend called Marilyn. Also the free party/beginnings of anti-cap protest scene did teknivals all over, and people were only too happy to march against the CJB. All of this is as British as the Hippy Trail, Chris Isherwood and Morris dancing.
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 02:41 (twenty-one years ago) link
Heroes and gods both. :-)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 02:45 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 02:50 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dave M. (rotten03), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 03:15 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Langley, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 05:44 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Oink, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 05:58 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 06:01 (twenty-one years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 06:04 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Gordon Drysdale, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 06:04 (twenty-one years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 06:05 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Oink, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 06:05 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Gordon Drysdale, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 06:06 (twenty-one years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 06:07 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Gordon Drysdale, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 06:07 (twenty-one years ago) link
so britpop is now carl cox and billy childish and lush and mbv and jungle and shoegaze? isnt the workability of it as a genre completely destroyed by by this? i'm relly not a fan of the idea that world of twist, st etienne etc were britpop or that the 92 era indiepop stuff was britpop. so some of the prime movers in the london axis of britpop were into doc scott, this doesnt make doc scott britpop though. there may well have been a great london scene of early 90s where people were equally into suburban base and nancy sinatra equally, but i dont see that time as britpop.
also, when were these jungle nights and where? i cannot accept any definition of jungle pre94 (or very late 93)
― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 07:05 (twenty-one years ago) link
― kevin brady (groeuvre), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 08:04 (twenty-one years ago) link
Good Mixer drinking started in 1990; their extra half-hour made it popular with people who'd gone to see/been in gigs in other pubs in Camden. We listened to pirates when we weren't going to see PJ Harvey and Pulp but that was ages before we went to clubs; I went to one called Paradise in the Angel in late '93 *actually with Simon R* and wrote the first article abt. jungle for US mag; friend who later got together with record company boss worked in a shop with Kemi from Kemistry and Storm and both flipped out when Kurtney popped in the night after Syndrome with FAT? on their mind for my pal.
Whoa, I'm beginning to Zelig out EEEEK.
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 09:31 (twenty-one years ago) link
yea, i know about paradise, you are right that that is the very beginnings of jungle as its own genre rather than hardcore or darkness. any earlier and it wasnt jungle (ok ok, i'll go as far back as possibly accepting summer 93 as jungle as separate from hardcore but even then it was not separated from hardcore properly at that point)
i just think your definition of britpop is too broad. broad enough to lose its defining characteristics, i mean if you're going to throw in st etienne and boys own why not terry farley, acid house, right back to danny rampling and shoom?
i see britpop as a rejection of 88-93, or at the very least, a whittling down. you mention creation records, and how they fit through the preceding period and into britpop, but look how the creation roster changed from 93 to 94. that was quite a shift, how can it all be britpop, across the big change? a lot of people by the wayside, a lot of new people, the aesthetic so oppositional to what went before?
i just think you are describing a london scene that had intersection with britpop, partly because of an industry perspective where people would continue to be involved, but in the music and in the social context britpop ripped up what had gone before
― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 09:52 (twenty-one years ago) link
"But he's a 28-year-old man with a beard." "Just look at my fixed smile."
Reminds me of Gareth.
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:07 (twenty-one years ago) link
― bham, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:31 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:55 (twenty-one years ago) link
Not Britpop. But the rave culture was.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:58 (twenty-one years ago) link
Oh . . . I thought Jerry was talking about something different:(
― Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:06 (twenty-one years ago) link
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:12 (twenty-one years ago) link
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:21 (twenty-one years ago) link
The other thing that the whole Britcentric attitude threw up was that unbelievably exciting moment in late 1996 and 97 when it looked like the Prodigy and the Chemical Brothers and Orbital and Underworld and Leftfield and Goldie and The Orb and the rest of them were all going to go overground on a major scale in the US, which now seems a bit silly and naive but I still treasure that feeling that something was about to happen. It's weird that a lot of the Britpop-bashing ravers tend to overlook that nowadays when they highlighting the failure of Oasis or Blur to make much of an impact on the US.
What do I know anyway... I hated nine-tenths of Britpop and was into the Afghan Whigs and Sebadoh at the time anyway.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:24 (twenty-one years ago) link
― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:25 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:27 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:32 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:35 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:36 (twenty-one years ago) link
Then again, yer basic teen pop never really went away; Take That and Boyzone were massive all the way through Britpop - and don't forget that both "Common People" and "Wonderwall" were kept off number one by the Waterman-produced, Cowell-managed Robson and Jerome.
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:40 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:43 (twenty-one years ago) link
― s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:49 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:52 (twenty-one years ago) link
― s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:58 (twenty-one years ago) link
― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:00 (twenty-one years ago) link
Gareth is correct: 'London scene 1990s' != Britpop. He is correct as well to see Britpop as a rejection of 1988-1993, as much as a continuation.
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:03 (twenty-one years ago) link
― s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:03 (twenty-one years ago) link
― s samson, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:06 (twenty-one years ago) link
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:11 (twenty-one years ago) link
― kate, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:14 (twenty-one years ago) link
Who cares? How snobby and elitist can you get? I know nothing of the bands you mention - but big fucking deal.''
well I think most ppl who were into britpop were 13-17, say.
Everyone when they get into music starts buying pop, which would include britpop at that time but it is not snobbish to go and buy some TG recs and prefer that to say, oasis or sleeper.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:15 (twenty-one years ago) link
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:16 (twenty-one years ago) link
and they've managed to make a couple of decent singles so ADF wins!
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:19 (twenty-one years ago) link
― KATE, Wednesday, 5 March 2003 12:22 (twenty-one years ago) link