Hüsker Dü Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (321 of them)
One of my favourite bands ever. And I love Sugar and those 1st 2 solo albums are great. I'm surprised Black Sheets Of Rains isn't more loved.

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Saturday, 28 January 2006 21:25 (eighteen years ago) link

i remember liking it at the time (albeit purely in a 'he's ROCKING again' way) but haven't heard it in forever.

hongro rating production over songwriting shockah.

j blount (papa la bas), Saturday, 28 January 2006 21:51 (eighteen years ago) link

hongro rating production over songwriting shockah.

I like a kind of production that lets the songwriting come to the forefront. That is, the vocalist is the most important "instrument", and the producer's job is to get him heard properly.

My Bloody Valentine may be the worst produced band ever for that exact reason.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:32 (eighteen years ago) link

I would say there's a logical fallacy at work here but that would give the situation credit.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:37 (eighteen years ago) link

My Bloody Valentine may be the worst produced band ever for that exact reason.


????

x-post

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Geir's argument strikes me as a bit of a red herring. I was just listening to "Makes No Sense at All" and the vocals don't seem to be mixed that low.

Obviously, their SST records were recorded with a limited budget. Are the vocals mixed low on their Warner Brothers albums? (I don't remember them being so.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:45 (eighteen years ago) link

i can say that "makes no sense at all" sounds like it was recorded with the mics two states over when placed next to even, say, a contemporaneous replacements song on a cd

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, not really, Jess! Of course, the Replacements were on a major by Tim, so it's not a fair comparison. The album they had before that on Twin Tone - the one with "I Will Dare" on it - it probably sounds better than Flip Your Wig-era Husker Du. (Don't know; don't have it.)

Listening to "Makes No Sense at All," the vocals are clear, guitar is clear, drums are reverby but fairly clear, bass is (for the most part) MIA.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:54 (eighteen years ago) link

i didnt say it didnt sound CLEAR just not LOUD

this is not a comment on the relative mertits of the song, which is great

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:55 (eighteen years ago) link

But that was their aesthetic, right? The guitar is supposed to be loud. My point was that the lead vocal on that track is not *buried*. It's right there.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:58 (eighteen years ago) link

no, yr right. it does sound distant to me, but you can still make out the words.

haha i dont know if i can remember a single husker du bassline.

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Are all you guys who are praising the Minutemen seriously gonna tell me that D. Boon's voice beats the "on the brink" scream of Bob Mould's?? Every time I listen to Husker Du I ca'nt keep the adrenaline from flowing! I guess it has to do with who you talk to, but after reading this thread I'm starting to feel that Husker Du are actually underrated.Out of the majority of most hardcore bands of their era, they had the best melodic sensibility. So yeah, I guess my answer is going to have to be CLASSIC!

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:15 (eighteen years ago) link

How bout the intro to something i learned today for a bassline?

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:16 (eighteen years ago) link

I hated the Warners records at the time of release, but otherwise love the band. I wonder if I'd like the last couple better now.

truck-patch pixel farmer (my crop froze in the field) (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Or the bassline for "Statues" or "Standing By the Sea" or "Powerline" or ...

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:23 (eighteen years ago) link

It's not bad production. They have a "sound" that is super-fuzzy guitar that is so distorted it is almost static and thin. Under that, is a clear bass line and a drum that is usually slightly behind and the vocals sound "far off" but are not by any means buried. You can generally make out every word. They tried to sound exactly the same live. It's probably why the songs sound so damn good!

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:02 (eighteen years ago) link

"Clear bass line" - no way.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Sheesh! If you wanna talk about nonexistant basslines, look at Metallica. They seem to underappreciate the role of the instrument, a crying shame that they wasted one of the most original bassists, because it's all about guitars and heavy metal with them.... ..and solos.

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Isn't that the situation with most heavy metal? Solid state amplification turned bass sound to shit. It's either just a wimpy presence or, in metal, this burbling inarticulate mass.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:55 (eighteen years ago) link

xxpost - is it the clear you have a problem with? their bassline is usually thick/more defineed, alteast more upfront and prominent, yes? (i say this without being able to remember very clearly now, but everything huskur's saying seems correct.) geir, i think it makes sense the far off vocals/pushed back melodics stuff would bug you. but no i don't think its a production failure either.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Susan, I just listened to the "Makes No Sense at All" b/w "Love Is All Around" single and you literally cannot hear a good percentage of the notes played on the bass. You cannot hear ANY of the articulations (i.e., the note being plucked) - all that is sonically present is an occasional bass range frequency that you can identify as the note currently resonating in the bass. Sometimes, you can make out the changes in this frequency and get some idea of a bass line going on.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:10 (eighteen years ago) link

Just the other day I was thinking about how Husker Du's records sounded real good, granted I was listening to the Meat Puppet's first album, but that album seems kinda similar to Husker Du to me, not so much stylisticaly, but because they are both speedily agressive music with good melodies. If Husker Du's sound is so troublesome for some, I wonder what they'll think of that first Meat Puppets album!

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Here's your problem: you don't realize you're hearing bass.

Any bass you hear in that song-- which I just listened to-- is BASS. And it's clear!! Very clear! I could play the fucking song easily. All that noisy treble floating atop is GUITAR!

Unless you're listening to a 96kb mp3 or something, of course.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:18 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe not a across the board trend then, but Dreams Recurring and Broken Heart/Broken Home and some others on Zen feature an unusually detectable bassline. and its got a pretty fat mopping up sound compared to the metallic stringyness of the other guitars..i mean more so than normal bass does and you're definitely being allowed to hear it. hd so fucking rules.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:20 (eighteen years ago) link

shit - xpost to tim

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:20 (eighteen years ago) link

If anything, the split between bass and guitar is clearer than most bands, actually because that guitar is so thin and trebly. Floaty. Washy. Psychedelic, even. Not comparable to funk music, of course. But, most other rock music tends to hide the bass very much in the back ground.

I can't understand how anyone couldn't hear the bass unless they just don't play instruments and can't clearly differentiate the sounds they're hearing. Put it this way: Bob can't play a drone on ONE fret way high up on the neck whilest simultaneously plucking several notes on the deep end (as if a guitar goes that deep, anyway), so the rolling deep notes you hear are bass.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:24 (eighteen years ago) link

an asshole that i can understand. FINALLY!

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Uh, friend, I know what I'm hearing. (And I have a vinyl copy of that single, btw.) I hear the bass, but a lot of the notes are simply INAUDIBLE.

Why don't you transcribe the bass part toward the end of the first verse and into what I guess you could call a recurring bridge (the "I don't know why you want to tell me when I'm right and when I'm wrong" section) part for me. Every note of it.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:35 (eighteen years ago) link

I am pretty sure this was more a matter of aesthetic than budget. In the 80s, even small labels had the sufficient budget to produce proper sound. It was more like the "guitar bands" on the American college rock scene had this low-fi thing going. "Makes No Sense At All", like several Dead Kennedys classics before it, sounds to me like it was recorded in mono, and hadn't it been for the fact that guitar amps were unable to sound that way by then, both might have been recorded in 1950.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Haha "proper sound."

You're right, though; it is practically mono!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:19 (eighteen years ago) link

From the gear specs I read, it sounds like they wanted it that way. Bob split his signal to go direct to board and through a distortion pedal, stereo chorus and amp that you would expect to sound that way.

Tim, you might try getting a record player that doesn't fold into a suitcase and slide under the bed with your stack of Little Golden Books. The notes are not inaudible at all. If I sat and listened, I could easily tell you: A, C#, B, etc. Husker Du would've sounded shitty with a clicky ultra-defined bass tone competing with everything else. You wouldn't know WHAT to listen to. Not right for the sound. This is why it's not a production issue.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:28 (eighteen years ago) link

>If I sat and listened, I could easily tell you: A, C#, B, etc.<

Why don't you go ahead and do it, then? I'm particularly interested in the part I mentioned above. For starters.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Well what does the production have to do with determining a good band?! Nothing! I believe this was about being a classic or a dud. Like I mentioned before, that Meat Puppets album is great, and sounds worse than any Husker Du recording, the sound is besides the point, you can HEAR the song, right?

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:36 (eighteen years ago) link

I love the record. We only got on this subject because I stated that the bass part was mostly MIA.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:38 (eighteen years ago) link

I think the majority of this thread is an arguement about the bass, or lack thereof!

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:39 (eighteen years ago) link

i dont hear any MIA in the Du's sound, Tim.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:40 (eighteen years ago) link

the arguement continues... :-)

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:42 (eighteen years ago) link

He's jamming fairly loosely in the same basic spot. It's not exactly the same each time. It's like A-A-G-D-G or thereabouts.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:45 (eighteen years ago) link

A-A-G-D-C-G I meant.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:46 (eighteen years ago) link

the bass just kinda plays the same thing as the guitar in a lot of HD songs, right?

the meat puppets first EP is so insane. like, they have no concept of how to vocalize/sing at ALL. which is awesome. it sounds like a no wave record. i think some ILXors have said as much before.

it's too bad Husker Du never sounded like a no wave band!

xpostststs

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:46 (eighteen years ago) link

I actually agree with the idea that the production concept is fine. I don't mind the fact that it's practically mono. But there's no reason why a somewhat more defined bass sound would mean that the sounds were *competing too much with one another* and *you wouldn't know what to listen to*.

It's not even so much that it should have been louder. It's just a crappy tone that does not cut through and YOU CANNOT HEAR A LOT OF THE NOTES.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Ooh, actually the only big change during that part is the open E. The rest is still same old scales on 3rd and 5th fret.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:49 (eighteen years ago) link

xpost: Meat Puppets first EP? What is it called? Now you've got me curious!

If Husker Du had a fatter deep end, I just don't think it would sound like Husker Du. It would sound thick and chunky.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:53 (eighteen years ago) link

In A Car! It's available pretty easily, I think it may have been released as a twofer CD with the first album at some point?

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:55 (eighteen years ago) link

it's like five minutes long or something. but really whacked out. there are these totally incoherent guitar bits that sound like drunken mickey mouse music.

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:55 (eighteen years ago) link

the bass just kinda plays the same thing as the guitar in a lot of HD songs, right?

Bob mostly concentrates on the higher strings and lets the bass fill out the bottom end. He does use barre chords, but the deepness of those chords is totally overpowered by the "bass frequencies" :-)

For a good example of just how LOUD the bass is compared to the guitar, listen to "I Don't Wanna Know If You are Lonely". The guitar is really, really buried behind an ultra loud bass, but it sounds cool. Husker is one of those bands where the bass is so present sometimes you think it's the guitar.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Thanks, Special Agent Gene Krupa... I'm on it!

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:00 (eighteen years ago) link

A-A-G-D-C-G? Where is this? I want to know the sequence of bass notes over these lines:

Makes no difference at all
Yeah, it makes no sense at all
Makes no difference at all
I don't know why you want to tell me
When I'm right and when I'm wrong
It's the same thing in your mind
Etc.

And yes, it goes to E minor at the beginning of the "I don't know why you want to tell me" line, and he plays an E on the downbeat, but what is the sequence of notes that follow?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:01 (eighteen years ago) link

>Bob mostly concentrates on the higher strings and lets the bass fill out the bottom end.<

No, he doesn't. It's a lot of chordal playing (open chords a lot, actually, if I'm not mistaken).

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:04 (eighteen years ago) link

E minor? On a bass? Hold on, I'm going to really do this up right for you line by line with the notes underneath.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 03:18 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.