The Death of Cinema pt. 94

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (472 of them)

great attitude.

s1ocki, Thursday, 13 September 2007 14:54 (7 years ago) Permalink

As this thread proves, the real problem with cinema is that cinephilia refuses to fucking die.

YES

impudent harlot, Thursday, 13 September 2007 14:54 (7 years ago) Permalink

what do you call cinephilia when it doesn't actually involve watching the movies you're talking about

Every cinephile I know does this. We're not all working critics, after all.

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 14:55 (7 years ago) Permalink

Yeah, attitude? It's hardcore personal economics.

also stfu w/ "populist" forever and ever and ever

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 September 2007 14:56 (7 years ago) Permalink

at this point i don't think a Hollywood youth-orientated comedy can ever appeal to me again. too late for Zoolander 2.

blueski, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:03 (7 years ago) Permalink

tonight hollywood weeps

s1ocki, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:03 (7 years ago) Permalink

they'll get over me, in time.

blueski, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:04 (7 years ago) Permalink

s1ocki, I have been writing a little about film for just over 8 months (for the first time since college) without benefit of a single free screening or DVD screener, so tell me who's supposed to subsidize my seeing all the 'important' films like KU.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:07 (7 years ago) Permalink

Culturally discerning [sic?] 25-year-olds who would've seen and discussed every Godard film in the mid '60s now reserve their passion for Knocked Up

Are you ever going to let this go, Morbs? Like "cinephiles" didn't love Mazursky or Blier.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:10 (7 years ago) Permalink

whatever dude, if you can't afford to see it, maybe hold back on criticizing it

s1ocki, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:11 (7 years ago) Permalink

i could care less if you ever see an apatow film but if you're going to talk shit about them i might take your opinions a little more seriously if you had a clue what you were talking about

s1ocki, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:11 (7 years ago) Permalink

As for the topic at hand: most critics find sentimentality irresistable (every Gore Vidal essay bemoaning the Death of the Novel to thread)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:12 (7 years ago) Permalink

So ... the death of cinephilia = the price of tickets

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:13 (7 years ago) Permalink

That's not the only reason, but is a contributing factor to my being well over the cinephilia as gluttony thing.

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:14 (7 years ago) Permalink

it's not difficult to identify things about a film you either know you dislike or strongly suspect you will dislike esp. now you can read fairly detailed synopsis on wikipedia ;)

blueski, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:14 (7 years ago) Permalink

it's dead where it used to be alive and vice versa.(thank you asian cinema for keeping the light)
but generally speaking,there are less good movies per year compared to the past,imo.

Zeno, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:16 (7 years ago) Permalink

All this talk about the Golden Age of Foreign Films is merely a bunch of critics fetishizing the act of going to a Bleeker Street theatre or whatever and having long arguments afterwards about Bergman's use of dwarfs in The Silence. These communities still exist and the discussion continues.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:17 (7 years ago) Permalink

the thing is,Bergman was shown in smaller,less central places than nyc, and now,"art directors" like him are shown ONLY on cities like nyc.
there are less audience for that "art" movies.

Zeno, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:20 (7 years ago) Permalink

Maybe we should stop thinking that the medium had a golden age, then. Mourn the lack of enthusiasm, or maybe its transition into something else. (Something very annoying.)

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:20 (7 years ago) Permalink

i think we should just keep talking ourselves in circles forever.

s1ocki, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:21 (7 years ago) Permalink

Knocked Up's postrelease prestige print ads featured a scintillating line about how marriage differs from Everybody Loves Raymond as an example of its Wilder-caliber screenwriting. I'll be pleasantly surprised if I like it, but I know the way to bet.

I've seen one episode of The Sopranos, let's talk about that now.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:22 (7 years ago) Permalink

"Wilder-caliber screenwriting" often didn't even meet Wilder's standards.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:23 (7 years ago) Permalink

i think we should just keep talking ourselves in circles forever.

Whatever keeps us from actually watching movies, right?

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:24 (7 years ago) Permalink

That "Everybody Loves Raymond" line was v. lame

Tom D., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:24 (7 years ago) Permalink

I bet it'll be the clip for its Best Original Screenplay nom

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:26 (7 years ago) Permalink

Irony: I am going to see Knocked Up tonight for $2 at the awesome cheap theater near where I live. Well, no, I guess that's not really ironic at all.

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:27 (7 years ago) Permalink

ok i am not going to have this argument again, if your really think you don't actually have to watch movies to pass judgment on them, i dont think we have much to talk about

s1ocki, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:31 (7 years ago) Permalink

To be fair, he wasn't passing judgement on Knocked Up but an archetype that overlaps with a perceived fanbase for that film.

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:35 (7 years ago) Permalink

YES

food critics, Christ

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:37 (7 years ago) Permalink

Morbs contructs these phony binarities: if you love Apatow films, you're a meathead who will ignore a Tsai Ming-Liang release.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:37 (7 years ago) Permalink

Can't one hate both?

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:38 (7 years ago) Permalink

I mean, wtf, a Renoir or pre-American Lang film wasn't getting the George Cukor Radio City treatment.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:39 (7 years ago) Permalink

no, I actually don't believe that particular phony binary

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:40 (7 years ago) Permalink

food critics, Christ

-- Dr Morbius, Thursday, September 13, 2007 3:37 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

haha

s1ocki, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:41 (7 years ago) Permalink

To be fair, he wasn't passing judgement on Knocked Up but an archetype that overlaps with a perceived fanbase for that film.

-- Eric H., Thursday, September 13, 2007 3:35 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

and ya whatev, it's all ill-informed sophistry to this food critic.

s1ocki, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:41 (7 years ago) Permalink

xp

(That 'binary' is, of course, true 99% of the time; check the b.o. tallies)

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:42 (7 years ago) Permalink

actually lang was pretty well distributed in the '20s. renoir, no; but shit, hollywood brought over just about all the major talents, front and behind camera, from germany in the early '20s.

lang was not an art-house director: he was making big-budget films in a studio as big as any in california.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:43 (7 years ago) Permalink

The b.o. discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that people who would be into TML movies are all paying off their grad student loans.

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:44 (7 years ago) Permalink

oh, and buying every new Criterion DVD sight unseen.

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:45 (7 years ago) Permalink

i'm not going to say Knocked Up (or numerous other youth-orientated Hollywood flicks) is a bad film (because i haven't seen it) but i stand by my 'this looks like i will hate it' thing and still find it interesting to look at why that is (not here tho). morbs probably doing a different thing ala momus vs tarantino.

blueski, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:46 (7 years ago) Permalink

and i def wouldn't bother making judgement about apatow fanbase - esp. not when his films get the love they do on ILE.

blueski, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:47 (7 years ago) Permalink

oh, and buying every new Criterion DVD sight unseen.

like the people on their forum? (actually if you think ILE/F threads are bad...)

impudent harlot, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:48 (7 years ago) Permalink

i don't think TML is very good. doesn't much to speak to my experience, doesn't much create forms that interest me.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:48 (7 years ago) Permalink

like the people on their forum?

Like all cinephiles in flyover country.

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:49 (7 years ago) Permalink

is Knocked Up YOUTH-oriented? Appears aimed squarely at 21-34 to me. But that is the New Adolescence, I guess.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:50 (7 years ago) Permalink

hah i was gonna say "speaking to my experience" = why i rate apatow highly (well, not the only reason)

impudent harlot, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:50 (7 years ago) Permalink

its all KNOCKED UP's fucking fault.

pisces, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:53 (7 years ago) Permalink

But that is the New Adolescence, I guess.

kinda but i concede that Apatow, even with Superbad, has cracked it with getting people 16, 26 AND 36 roffling in the aisles

blueski, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:55 (7 years ago) Permalink

is Knocked Up YOUTH-oriented?

It's het-oriented, and those hets who secretly fantasize about kissing Paul Rudd.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:55 (7 years ago) Permalink

My only peeve about Knocked Up sight unseen is how it was being sold as some sort of sleeper when it had as big a promotional push as any other summer blockbuster of the Michael Bay ilk.

Eric H., Thursday, 13 September 2007 15:55 (7 years ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.