Rolling US Economy Into The Shitbin Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (9719 of them)

otm. My parents had this problem, I am sure it contributed to the breakup of their marriage.

immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Saturday, 6 January 2024 19:41 (three months ago) link

owning a house, owning real estate - that is a fucking extravagance.

― ꙮ (map), Saturday, 6 January 2024 12:47 PM (one hour ago) bookmarkflaglink

An extravagance? It's out of reach for too many people, but it's hardly an extravagance. Owning a home should be within the reach of most of us. I realize that it isn't, but it should be.

― immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Saturday, 6 January 2024 12:58 PM (one hour ago) bookmarkflaglink

whether or not you think owning homes is an extravagance or not, housing markets with lower shares of owners (for example in many parts of europe where long term rentals are more common, or in singapore where every residence is technically public housing on a 99-year lease from the government) tend to function much better. when housing is primarily based on home ownership, increasing affordability means decreasing property values of home owners, which puts the two goals in opposition. only one generation can both buy cheap homes and have them be a source of wealth

flopson, Saturday, 6 January 2024 19:46 (three months ago) link

I guess it depends on what you mean by "function." It's a truism that renters build up no equity.

immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Saturday, 6 January 2024 19:48 (three months ago) link

that’s good though. making money off home equity means house prices are going up, which means housing is becoming less affordable. there are other sources of equity, but there’s only one housing market

flopson, Saturday, 6 January 2024 19:56 (three months ago) link

If the assumption is that if the US had more renters, rental laws would be stronger, I think that's a pretty bad assumption to make.

longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Saturday, 6 January 2024 21:29 (three months ago) link

They'd definitely be stronger, for landlords.

immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Saturday, 6 January 2024 21:30 (three months ago) link

real chicken and egg situation and it assumes the organization of renters in absence of regulation can happen. you have to be a real piece of shit as a landlord, usually in areas other than that, to face repercussions

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Saturday, 6 January 2024 22:01 (three months ago) link

agreed. it’s also gross how people with money will latch on to the thing they perceive as an extravagance that someone scraping by owns, when that’s probably someone’s prized possession that they actually value and maintain because they understand that windfall may not come again

― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Saturday, January 6, 2024 12:44 PM (four hours ago) bookmarkflaglink

Related pet peeve: people who apparently think that every mobile phone is a iPhone and every personal computer is a Mac. 1) These items are not always as big an extravagance as these critics assume, and 2) try functioning in the world as we know it without reliable online access (especially getting and keeping a job).

Infanta Terrible (j.lu), Saturday, 6 January 2024 22:34 (three months ago) link

just batshit crazy. it’s nearly impossible to do anything without access to a computer of some sort and for the vast majority of the population, that’s a phone

one of the things support groups use to help the unhoused is to help them charge their phones. what are they going to do, sell their phone for exactly zero dollars and then be even worse off?

ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Saturday, 6 January 2024 23:45 (three months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.