Steven Spielberg - classic or dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1359 of them)

book actually had the balls to kill Hammond though which the movie didn't.

these are two different characters with the same name: one is a cartoon villain created only to be killed and the other is a tragic self-portrait

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 23:33 (eight months ago) link

xxp respectfully disagree - as mentioned, one of the core ideas of the film is needed to address the power cinema has in re-writing history, something Iwo Jima has been criticized for by its detractors.

birdistheword, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 23:35 (eight months ago) link

Hammond in the book is i believe fairly megalomaniacal, rather than the wrongheaded avuncular guy in over his head. i don't disagree btw that Laura Dern is a better actor in JP than the fella with the pipe in ROTLA, especially when it's put like that, but i think the overall execution of the latter film is very gripping in ways that JP is not with use of character. i won't dispute the sheer entertainment value of JP obv.

omar little, Tuesday, 22 August 2023 23:58 (eight months ago) link

three months pass...

Classic

Amazing how Spielberg has always gotten all the credit for his cinematographer's work

— Russ (@Russ__ATX) December 19, 2023

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 19 December 2023 14:02 (four months ago) link

lol, not that stupid response, this:

on Spielberg's birthday thinking about one of his hardest-ever shots pic.twitter.com/mG7FiZQCB3

— Brendan Hodges (@metaplexmovies) December 18, 2023

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 19 December 2023 14:02 (four months ago) link

brb, double checking to make sure I didn't accidentally follow that first poster

stephen miller is not your friend (Eric H.), Tuesday, 19 December 2023 14:35 (four months ago) link

Isn't that a variation on his famous shot in Jaws?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_zoom

clemenza, Tuesday, 19 December 2023 14:45 (four months ago) link

It is, but there's a lot more going on in terms of movement, framing, etc. Especially when the camera pulls back behind the *other* camera.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 19 December 2023 14:54 (four months ago) link

two weeks pass...

I'd never seen "Bridge of Spies" before, but I think I really love Spielberg in this sort of ... I guess almost post-modern mode. The movie has the rhythm and vibe of a classic '40s film - much of it I could imagine Academy aspect ratio and black and white - yet is filled with virtuoso Spielberg shots and modern FX and other more contemporary trademarks. He's been in this mode for a bunch of movies in a row, since "War Horse" more or less, with his weaker recent stuff (The BFG, Ready Player One) the conspicuous exceptions/deviations.

I think I mentioned on the relative thread that I bet Spielberg could have made a compelling version of "Killers of the Flower Moon."

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 January 2024 01:45 (three months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.