Ideas for ILX

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3115 of them)

Oh that's OK... Cheers.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:21 (fourteen years ago) link

The black text on the Site New Answers page is unfixable with CSS because of this:

<li><a style='color: #000000'

There's an inline style somewhere, and that'll always trump.

And yes, keith, if I haven't mentioned it in a while... you rule. :)

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:23 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah, the style is how it does the colouring... The bug is that 'restore defaults' should make it not put the style in at all, not make it set them all to black.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:24 (fourteen years ago) link

(is this how keith spends his holiday?)

koogs, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:24 (fourteen years ago) link

lol - going to Glasgow shortly to see various ILXors and Dr. C.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:25 (fourteen years ago) link

welcome to site new answers, kenan, you will be able to keep up with site new nonsense better now.

estela, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, not too much. The stylesheet I use is almost unreadable on that page. I'm kind of glad I didn't know that before, because there's nothing I can do about it. The links are black, black forever. Black like death.

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:30 (fourteen years ago) link

I'll fix that...

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:31 (fourteen years ago) link

And this is the most used page? I could crawl into a hole right now. I feel like I've been walking around with a booger hanging out of my nose for the last 3 years.

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:33 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, we just didn't want to embarrass you by saying anything.

Hugh Manatee (WmC), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:49 (fourteen years ago) link

Huh, New Questions. Interesting. I assumed that this would be a list of unanswered questions. Maybe that's how it used to be?

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:53 (fourteen years ago) link

Keith, you are awesome.

the evil genius of Zaiger Genetics (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 12:56 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah I think buried is fine - or maybe with a simple default configuration that people can customise, but cutting them altogether likely isn't going to work.

― Keith, Tuesday, August 4, 2009 11:58 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I've kind of lost track of what specific menu bar features are getting added here, but philosophically I disagree with this. Getting the UI right is hard, and people are always going to wail and gnash when you take away their pet feature, but my experience of developing for end users is that cutting features that are either little-used, have better alternatives, or are just silly (alphabetical list of threads?!) will make your life easier in the long run, as well as making the site easier to use.

caek, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 13:14 (fourteen years ago) link

I've got a couple of different menubar mockups kicking about somewhere, will see if they're still relevant.

Keith: could sna colouring use named colours rather than values? That'd let stylesheets define them to fit in.

stet, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 13:14 (fourteen years ago) link

In Waverley. No sign of Janet Street Porter. Up to anything this afternoon? Will be in Glasgow in 45.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 13:28 (fourteen years ago) link

OK, this is maybe a dumb question, but when you're in Site New Answers, is it possible for threads you've clicked on to appear in a different color, just as it is if you were viewing a board on its own? I'm also not sure that the blue used in thread titles on blueski.css is an option on Site New Answers, but I guess I can live with that. (Basically, I want Site New Answers to visually render exactly like blueski.css.)

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:08 (fourteen years ago) link

This works if you stop hiding sub-boards (at least with old.css).

pon de floor (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:12 (fourteen years ago) link

unreg users on IRE

( ˙_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:16 (fourteen years ago) link

Jaymc, this is the thing that was so disturbing me upthread. There's an errant bit of code that makes all links on the Site New Answers page black, clicked or not clicked, style or no style, no matter what. And only on that page.

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Ok, not all links -- all thread title links. Which is kind of even weirder, because every other link on the page is more prominent than the one you want to click.

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Kenan, it's not as simple as that. It doesn't style them at all if you've never messed with the customisation.

Jay, yes I'll have a think, but will take a bit of work as I'll need to figure out the maths for hsb colours (to make visited links darker than whatever colour you've chosen or something like that) and so on but I thinking could do it.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:41 (fourteen years ago) link

Cool, thanks. That's one of the reasons I don't use Site New Answers very often.

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:44 (fourteen years ago) link

You have more than one reason!? :)

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:46 (fourteen years ago) link

yes, that's also my main reason (the other being that a lot of boards confuse me). In any case, thanks a lot for doing this!

Gigolo Grasiento (baaderonixx), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:50 (fourteen years ago) link

hsb? u mean rgb? i'd subtract the same amount - percentage wise - about 25%? from each val. of course you'd have to split the string into the three components.

ledge, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Well, only a couple of other reasons. One is that if you're following more than a few boards, older threads get bumped off the page more quickly. Another might just be a personal psychological thing -- like it just feels more orderly to look at the boards separately. I feel like I can keep track of things better. But I still use SNA from time to time, mostly to see if I've missed things on the smaller boards I don't check quite as often as ILE/ILM.

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 15:57 (fourteen years ago) link

No I meant hsb - I think I am right... Doing it in rgb doesn't quite work e.g you can't make red (255-0-0) darker by any easy multiplication of the rgb numbers I think, but you can convert to hsb, reduce the 'b' and then put it back to rgb.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:00 (fourteen years ago) link

Sorry meant lighter not darker. Not easy this on an iPhone.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Ah okay Jay. Makes sense.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:02 (fourteen years ago) link

If the colors are CSS instead of hardcoded, you get the darkening for free -- just make them <A class="greenlink" or the like, and in the stylesheet specify a:link to be whatever actual color value you want. If there's no a:visited style, you'll get the browser default, but if you want to make it a darker green or w/e, then the stylesheet can do that.

stet, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:06 (fourteen years ago) link

I can't for the life of me think how a stylesheet could work here but I guess I'll be seeing you shortly so I suppose we can talk it over!

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:07 (fourteen years ago) link

ok, yup, lighter is harder. how would you convert to hsb tho? (btw i think of it as hsv, hence my confusion).

ledge, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:09 (fourteen years ago) link

I know that it's not need-to-know for me at this point, but I don't understand what's unavoidable about having an inline style that colors the links on just that one page. But there's a lot I don't know here, and I can happily file this under "known unknowns."

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:09 (fourteen years ago) link

If I could type faster on this thing I would explain my logic! When I'm back at my desk!

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:10 (fourteen years ago) link

it's 'cause of users picking their own colours for site new answers, ain't it? that kind of overrides and sits outside any stylesheet coding.

ledge, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:14 (fourteen years ago) link

unless you want to hack every stylesheet with a class for every possible colour (and visited, etc, variations thereon).

ledge, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:15 (fourteen years ago) link

users can pick their own colors for... what? They can?

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:16 (fourteen years ago) link

That's it. I think Stet's point is that you could abstract it e.g. the class is 'death' which is defined to be black and you could also hardwire a visited class but this would all seem impractical to me... Black doesn't mean death to Chinese people, for example. My finger hurts.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:16 (fourteen years ago) link

it does to me

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:17 (fourteen years ago) link

sure, blame it on the chinese

max, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:18 (fourteen years ago) link

Lol kenan.

Ledge rgb to hsv is a little complicated. Google it. There's an algorithm on wikipedia I think.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:18 (fourteen years ago) link

So you can pick your own colors for links on the new answers page (which remains future news to me, I don't see any such option), AND you can pick your own stylesheet, which conflicts with the colors the users may have picked... goddamn, man. You're going to give yourself a brain hemorrhage over this. Just DO NOT DO one of those things. Why would you need to do both?

reared on Shakespeare (kenan), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:20 (fourteen years ago) link

It's been that way for about two years! Click on the site new answers heading.

Keith, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:22 (fourteen years ago) link

colour picker is linked from prefs page.

ledge, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:24 (fourteen years ago) link

it's 'cause of users picking their own colours for site new answers, ain't it? that kind of overrides and sits outside any stylesheet coding.

Well, even if you don't pick your own colors for Site New Answers, you're still stuck with the default color (black). Basically, as it stands, you can't use SNA without overriding stylesheet colors for thread titles.

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Yes you can. The problem arises when you start hiding sub-boards, or at least this is the way old.css behaves; I can't speak for the other stylesheets.

pon de floor (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:51 (fourteen years ago) link

> how would you convert to hsb tho?

java's Color class has a method. (the actual maths is a fiddle, usually a case statement which splits it up into 60 degree segments and treats them differently. http://actionsnippet.com/?p=797 )

koogs, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 16:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Yes you can. The problem arises when you start hiding sub-boards, or at least this is the way old.css behaves; I can't speak for the other stylesheets.

Maybe I don't understand what you're talking about. I just changed my stylesheet to "old.css," I selected show "all" boards in the Site New Answers settings, and I set the color for all of the boards to be the default, black. Site New Answers still shows thread titles as black, rather than the blue/purple of old.css.

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Does it do this if you click the "Restore Defaults" button as opposed to manually setting the values?

pon de floor (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:20 (fourteen years ago) link

A-ha! No, it doesn't. I forgot about "Restore Defaults." Yeah, that works fine then, even with blueski.css. So the problem only develops if you set preferences for Site New Answers.

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 17:24 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.