Led Zeppelin: Classic Or Dud?

I like "Presence," but I feel like it should have been named "More!" Like, you spend all your time with Led Zeppelin, all those great songs that you've heard so many times in so many places, and then you hit a lull, take a breather, and bam - but wait, there's "More!" Like an entire album of deep cuts, for the real heads.

...plus they're ripping off Irving Berlin.

Correction, he didn't write "Tea For Two"! I meant Randy California.

Presence ...an entire album of deep cuts, for the real heads.

I met a woman who had all the Zeppelin CDs except for this. When I said, "Oh, you don't have Presence, she hadn't even heard of it.

Like an entire album of deep cuts, for the real heads.

This is such a '76 thing: you could say the same about The Royal Scam, Tejas, or Black and Blue.

xp

Why "Presence" figures so largely in my Zeppelin love is because I found out about it after I was sure that I had purchased their entire catalogue, including Coda. I was a kid who obsessed over Zeppelin, so when I stumbled across it in a music store, i thought it was some type of obscene joke.

― J. Grizzle (trainsmoke), Wednesday, August 9, 2006

Marcello's piece is great, and makes me want to listen to all of Presence again, when usually I oly want to hear Achilles and Fault

yes on "The Lemon Song."

Crazy talk! Zep at its most fonky.

The first time I really heard LZ (other than classic rock radio in the car) was when my friend gave me a tape with "IV" on one side and "Presence" on the other, I had no real frame of reference for the band or even an idea of when the albums came out or what the album covers looked like, I probably owned like ten cassettes total at that point, so to me "Presence" was always just a LZ record and I loved it.

Obv as an adult I'm like "what a weird entry point" and I understand why it doesn't have the same standing in their catalog as other records, but deep down to me it is an unimpeachable classic.

The long-gone online reviewer Capn Marvel had one of my all-time favourite lines in his review of Presence:

these guys were trying to keep afloat amidst punk rock? They sound like they all weigh 400 pounds and eat gold dubloons for breakfast.

that's praise, right?

man, "walter's walk" is what you put on when you wanna hear how mean that band could be but not be reminded of shitty classic rock radio… and I think "Hot's on" and "royal Orleans" are where you hear how much they liked the Meters…

Jeez, CapnMarvel, that’s a name I haven’t heard in 20 years. He was great!

Could have put this on the obituary thread but fuck giving this repulsive creep any kind of respect.

https://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/1530552/Richard-Cole-dead-death-Led-Zeppelin-tour-manager-Robert-Plant-instagram-tribute-news

His own Zeppelin book is one of the most repulsive things I've ever read. I don't think I got more than a quarter of the way in.

Speaking of, new bio out.

Calling that an "obituary" is giving it a bit too much credit. It's roughly two sentences on the man's life followed by this:

_sha_nizzle typed: “Very sorry to read this..

“May he rest in peace.”

groupieplant added: “It can't be!

“I do not believe."

_bella_jenn_ said: “Condolences for your loss. R.I.P. Richard”

https://i.imgur.com/o2LxA5w.jpg

Always blastin’ HotH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVWmI69wu44

facial hair experiment phase

https://www.loudersound.com/news/led-zeppelin-fans-are-losing-their-minds-over-this-new-footage-of-a-legendary-1970-gig

first I've heard of the 'becoming LZ' documentary

It's a shame they didn't stick with the Cavalier and Master Dahlia Gardener look. I hope Page is wearing rain boots.

“Just goin out in mah wellies for a wee bit of tendin’ to the old flower patch it is, then playing with the band around 1700”

I read that Page somehow never saw Hendrix perform live. Part of me thinks that’s plausible — certain things just never aligned schedule/timing-wise — and part of me thinks that, with his arrogance, Page purposely avoided the guitarist that shocked and stunned all of his contemporaries into reevaluating their approaches.

Between the radio and being a professional musician I imagine it was impossible for page to avoid hearing Hendrix in the late 60s

Oh, I’m sure Page heard Hendrix on records and/or radio. But all of his musician peers (not limited to guitarists) saw him live. I can easily imagine Page wanting to sidestep an (ahem) experience so overwhelming as to make him possibly question his abilities.

Lemmy used to claim that early Hendrix UK shows were performed with a foot of water in front of the stage because all the preeminent guitar players came down to see him and cried through the whole set knowing they'd never be that good.

i was never a fan but i like the yardbirds alot!

A guitarist friend once commented to me that Page didn’t sound like he had any idea what he was going to play would sound like. And notwithstanding all the session work Page did (in which there was likely very little improvisation), I am inclined to agree. It’s been a while since I played it but you can’t listen to something like that solo in “Heartbreaker” and hear it as anything other than Page kind of fumbling his way from one series of licks and hand motions to the next. It gets by on sheer energy and has some charm but it almost falls apart about 5 times and at no point does Page sound even close to as in control as most of his contemporaries.

Incredible producer and songwriter. Innovator and iconic rock star. But pretty overrated as a soloist.

Yes and no... in live recordings, he sometimes sounds downright hamfisted. And yet, in the studio, he was often an absolute master of the form. His solos for songs like "Good Times, Bad Times", "Whole Lotta Love", "Black Dog" and "Stairway" certainly don't lack virtuosity or excitement.

Yeah come on, there are plenty of concise, well-crafted guitar melodies there, e.g. "Thank You", "Tangerine", "The Rover".

Youtube comments definitely show that a lot of people hear the "Heartbreaker" solo as something other than what you described btw! The second part, after the rhythm section joins, sounds like pretty tight blues-rock playing to me. The first unaccompanied section mostly sounds like it's about relative levels of space and activity - like Eliot Fisk, he sounds like he's pushing his technique past the point where he has total control in order to prioritize the level of intensity he's going for, which I kind of appreciate.

That's also what a lot of the live playing seems like to me.

I think the thing I would say about Page is that he is an extremely _sloppy_ player. And quite honestly, I don't think in this he's particularly different than Hendrix could be. You hear Hendrix at an event like... well, you can talk about the Winter Festival for Peace, or the notorious Scene Club '68 performance, but even something like Woodstock - Woodstock was an _extremely_ uneven gig for him. There were spontaneous moments of absolute brilliance and transcendence, like Villanova Junction, but there was also a lot of mediocrity packed into that set. I think that when you're constantly pushing yourself to the limit of what's possible, what happens is that you do wind up failing catastrophically, a lot of the time.

Also both of them were constantly high as fuck, which made it hard for them to perform consistently.

"I’m not a guitarist as far as a technician goes, I just pick it up and play it. Technique doesn’t come into it. "
https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/the-durable-led-zeppelin-36209/

"Failing catastrophically a lot of the time" is an overstatement though imo (wrt both Page and Hendrix).

xp It's been a while since I've read up on Hendrix, but IIRC what was expected of him (like long and over-the-top jams) was a bit frustrating - like he didn't feel the need to do that all the time, but later on he did more of that knowing that's what a lot of concert-goers wanted to see, and he didn't think it made his concert performances all that consistent. I think breaking in new groups (Woodstock, New Year's at the Fillmore) probably contributed to the unevenness of those sets too, and it's implied Hendrix was fully aware this - it's a new group, he's consciously trying new things, it's not going to be an immaculate concert performance.

That's interesting - he felt commercial/social pressure to play long instrumental improvisations instead of shorter songs?

"Failing catastrophically a lot of the time" is an overstatement though imo (wrt both Page and Hendrix).

I guess it would depend on what you think their intentions were.

"Failing catastrophically a lot of the time" is an overstatement though imo (wrt both Page and Hendrix).

― No purposes. Sounds. (Sund4r)

Admittedly I'm holding them both to a lot higher standards than their audiences of the day did. But God, on audience Zep tapes of the day you can occasionally hear audience members muttering about how fucking bored they are when Page would decide to take the next 45 minutes to solo. He also had a nasty habit not knowing when to quit digging - witness the solo on Stairway at Led Zeppelin's last concert before Bonham's death. It's the longest Stairway solo on record, and it spends most of that time begging to be put out of its misery. Hendrix never bottomed out like that, but Hendrix also died really fucking young...

xxp I would say more social than commercial pressure. I imagine others get this impression too, but personal conflicts aside, he usually came off as a very congenial guy who genuinely wanted people at his shows to have a good time.

On Hendrix's Isle Of Wight set he said something like, "You still wanna hear all that old stuff? We're trying to get some new things together."

re: Page vs. Hendrix in terms of their relative "sloppiness," I hear Hendrix as focused, as constantly trying to outdo himself, and never completely satisfied. I don't get any of that from Page's live performances, for the most part (though there are exceptions). There aren't any Hendrix live recordings where I think, "Ugh, just finish the solo already!" I can't think of many Zep shows were I don't think that.

Page can sometimes be sloppy on stage, but that's partly because he's the only guitarist, and trying to replicate these intricate overdubbed arrangements by yourself live was probably an impossible task without a rhythm guitarist on hand to hold things down. If we're comparing to Hendrix, even on record Hendrix generally sounds like he does live, imo. But LZ in the studio is pretty different from LZ live, and of course that also comes down to Page's precision and attention to detail as a producer as well as player. In the studio, the "Heartbreaker" solo is probably the only time he ever comes to "sloppy."

True, I can't think of anything sloppy on record other than "Heartbreaker." While I definitely understand the difficulty of trying to replicate the arrangements onstage, I would point to the Who (because of course I would) and how they managed to perform Tommy live without multiple acoustic guitars or French horns or keyboards. Piano part? Have the bass play it. French horn part? Bass again. Electric guitar overdubbing acoustic? Let the bass handle the electric part. So I guess I'm saying that John Entwistle should've been in Zeppelin.

Bringing it back to Hendrix, by necessity he stripped down any studio arrangements for live performance, and obviously made it work (and, somehow, made it sound more expansive) since he was a simultaneous lead/rhythm player. Not taking anything away from Page's abilities, but he never had the focus on rhythm playing that Hendrix or Townshend had (same problem with Jeff Beck and Eric Clapton).

I mean, a lot of things are 'sloppy' by contemporary studio standards: that lead guitar on "Tangerine" doesn't quite sound in tune with the band, there's a lot of fret buzz etc on "Babe I'm Gonna Leave You", etc. Wrt the unaccompanied part of the "Heartbreaker" solo, though, I'm not even really sure how to gauge the 'sloppiness' - relative to what? He's not playing to a rhythm section, the time feel seems rubato even in the introductory slower parts and it's not like there's some definitive version that predates Led Zeppelin II that we can compare to.

I can't even count a regular time signature there. I always heard it as senza tempo so idk what "sloppy" means in that context. It's like saying Sonic Youth sing out of tune - out of tune with what?

Senza Tempo aka Chief Keef tempo

Maybe it only sounds "sloppy" because it sounds so live and spontaneous, very one-take. As opposed to the considered, specific nature of the band's other 99.99999% of recorded music, it sounds relatively loose and improvised, tentative and tossed off, though not in a bad way. Again, especially compared to a similarly gonzo solo like "Good Times, Bad Times," which is so precise and fussed over, "Heartbreaker" always reminds me of Nigel's clearly Page-inspired solo in "Spinal Tap" (though also not in a bad way).

The "Heartbreaker" solo always sounded to me like someone trying to show off their technical facility and dexterity and not really being able to pull it off. I don't get the sense that he's really trying to communicate anything beyond trying to show off his facility and dexterity, but I don't get that feeling from any other (studio) Page solo.

xxxxxxxp I actually have the transcript buried in a text file. It's been too long since I've seen the whole film, but here's what I have for that general section - FWIW, I'm at a loss as to whether he actually said came or if I'm misinterpreting it as something else.

"This is dedicated to Linda, to the cat right there with the silver face, dedicated to Kirsten, Karen, and that little four-year-old girl over there with the yellow balloon. I wanna say thank you for the last three years, one of these days we'll get together again. Thanks for showing up, you're outta sight.

"If you want the same old songs, we can do that. You all wanna hear all those old songs?"

"Damn, man, we're just trying to get some other things together. I just woke up about two minutes ago, was recording some little things but I don't think... I don't know...I think we'll play something a little more familiar. 'Cause I ain't came (?) yet myself, I don't know about you, but I ain't came (?).

"There I came (?). Thank you. Thank you for being so patient. Maybe one of these days we'll join again. I really hope so. All right."

So really, the difference is mainly that Page is more meticulous about what shows up on the record than Hendrix is. Hendrix's his best stuff is his often more spontaneous stuff (see for instance how most Hendrix fans prefer the sloppier mono version of "Red House" released in the UK to the US version). Yeah, I think it's fair to say that Hendrix was a more consistently great live performer than Page was. I do think that Page was a lot more accomplished and focused when it comes to the studio, though. Which makes sense - Hendrix got his chops playing in US touring bands, and Page established himself as a studio guitarist.

One of the great "what ifs" about Hendrix's death is his planned collaboration with Miles Davis - Miles was arguably making his last great records, so it's not a stretch to think it would've been amazing - but that's also a reflection of the kind of artist he had become. He was taking forever to make his records, partly from perfectionism but he was also recording endless variations of his new material - the fact that so much of it holds up as great listening probably shows how difficult it was for anyone to say "THIS is the one for the album." I never got the impression Page and Zeppelin was like that once they were in the studio - I think they recorded things more like the Beatles (or as composers, if that makes sense) rather than jazz musicians, and it's a big reason why there were able to be a bit more prolific than Hendrix when it came to finishing and releasing albums.