Hüsker Dü Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (321 of them)
Watch out, move outta the way - give the cranky bastard some room.

I'm tempted to say that Husker Du : alt.indie.rock :: Sex Pistols : punk rock - they've been swallowed up and absorbed and regurgitated to such a degree that their own impact, musically, has petered out to a big ol' pfffft of whatever, while claims can be made of other groups (hello, Buzzcocks) having a similar effect. That said, I can't think of any DIRECT antecedent that is completely beholden to the Du - there was a cool line in the Spin Alt Guide about Nirvana mixing the Husker's "Whatever" with the Replacement's "Nevermind", but, other than that, it seems that any Husker influence attributed to a rock groop is more a result of Husker Du doing a similar guitar rock thing first and folks simply accepting Husker's influence as a dogmatic given.

Like, shit, if they're these doods playing 3-to-4-chord pop songs w/ all this distortion & screaming that sound more like the Beatles or some 60s hippie shit than that girl group doowop stuff Joey Ramone jones'd, then it's GOTTA be because of Husker Du, yeah?

It's been a while since Husker Du popped my cherry - we used to be inseperable, but I don't go hang out with them much anymore. It's crass to say, but they served their purpose. Yeah, once in a while, I get nostalgic, and I throw on one of the Big Three records, but I enjoy them more if I try to hear what I heard back then (the "power", the emotion, the soft & prickly feedback) than listening to them in the now - current timeframe listening has me focusing on stupid shit like the crappy drum sounds, or the cloying lyrics, or all that other nonsense. Nowadays, I like Husker's failures (cf. _Everything Falls Apart_, "...Skin a Cat", "The Baby Song") more than their successes (cf. the "good" stuff).

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 20 November 2002 20:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

two months pass...
"I really do think if they didn't look like truck drivers, there would be no question about their place in the canon."

Outside of the music, one of the things that I could relate about bands such as Husker Du, The Minutemen & The Replacements at the time was that they looked like people in your neighborhood. They sure as hell didn't look as silly as Motley Crue or Bon Jovi or some other popular crap when I was in high school.


earlnash, Friday, 14 February 2003 18:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Funny thing was, the guy with the moustache was the gayest looking one!"

And his name was Frank Beard! Oh wait a minute, what am I saying...

Paula G., Friday, 14 February 2003 18:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

three weeks pass...
Classic. New Day Rising and Zen Arcade are pulverizing emotional beauty. Candy Apple Grey is also superb, and everything they did is great with Warehouse coming in last. Solo Mould and Sugar left me a bit cold, but I liked Grant Hart's band Nova Mob a lot.

John Bullabaugh (John Bullabaugh), Sunday, 9 March 2003 02:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

two years pass...
Husker Du sounds great right about now. Wow, maybe I've finally really grown into this band. They don't depress me anymore.

Although, something interesting: if any band ever equalled nostalgia without ever even having heard them before, it was definitely Husker Du. They just sound nostalgiac. How interesting that their name comes from an old (Norwegian?) boardgame that means "Do you remember?" (The Wikipedia article was a great read and talks about how they came up with the name. Also in the article, there's a cute song described by the then-to-be singer of Semisonic about his old girlfriend and the band they used to see together: "Remember when you held my hand you used to say I love them so much/Lonely when I hear the band/Do you remember, do you recall?" That this is an homage to Hüsker Dü is confirmed by the album's liner notes, which have the words "do you remember? dü you recall?" written across them in large letters.)

Probably the first and best emo band. Wow, Sebadoh is indebted to them, I think. Just realized that. Husker Du were less whiney even when they were whining, though. They sounded pretty damn macho for non-macho psychedelic hardcore.

Hüsker of The Corn, Saturday, 28 January 2006 13:33 (eighteen years ago) link

LOL @ thread title
How about : Breathing, Eating & Staying Alive : Classic or Dud ? or something

blunt (blunt), Saturday, 28 January 2006 14:34 (eighteen years ago) link

Haters upthread begone. Blunt OTM.

Amazing how I can still get such a visceral reaction by someone suggesting Husker Du aren't for the ages, even years after I listened to them regularly.

Mould was hit or miss after the Du (Workbook + Cooper Blue, yes; Black Sheets of Rain + FU:EL, no) as the lyrics got even sappier and the production more polished, but I'd take Flip Your Wig through Warehouse with me anywhere.

Mitya (mitya), Saturday, 28 January 2006 14:38 (eighteen years ago) link

I would say dud, regardless of whether you are speaking of the overrated Minneapolis band from the 80s or the Norwegian nostalgia series that used to run on Norwegian TV in the 70s and 80s, aimed at an audience consisting of people born around 1890-1910.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 28 January 2006 17:09 (eighteen years ago) link

They can't possibly be overrated if they've influenced as many bands as they have, which mostly went on to become big influences in their own right. And not only do bands claim them as highly influential, but it is also easily discernable in their sounds and "the sound" that defined post-punk indie rock.

Hüsker of The Corn, Saturday, 28 January 2006 17:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Influence in itself for the sake of influence=overrated :)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 28 January 2006 19:36 (eighteen years ago) link

cf Teh Beatles

Jimmy Mod (I myself am lethal at 100 -110dB) (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Saturday, 28 January 2006 19:53 (eighteen years ago) link

Influence in itself for the sake of influence=overrated :)

"for the sake of influence" makes no sense, Geir. You mean like: "Oh they weren't even trying to write good songs, they were just trying to be influential!" Or maybe you mean, "Pffft! They weren't even GOOD, they were just incredibly influential!" Duh, makes no sense. Try again.

Hüsker of The Corn, Saturday, 28 January 2006 21:09 (eighteen years ago) link

I am shocked at the hate that this band seemed to unleash (though much of it was several years ago, apparently). I always thought the band to br crit-darlings.

Once the band got over the noisecore of the early releases, they unleashed a string of amazing recordings that I still enjoy to this day. The Living End might be my favorite live album and I hate live albums.

Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Saturday, 28 January 2006 21:22 (eighteen years ago) link

Their songs don't sound too bad. I mean, it sounds like there were some songs in there. Too bad the vocals were mixed so low.

And, no, I wouldn't say I hate them. Just that, well, I find that their albums sounded more or less like bad demos, not letting the songs come through properly.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 28 January 2006 21:23 (eighteen years ago) link

One of my favourite bands ever. And I love Sugar and those 1st 2 solo albums are great. I'm surprised Black Sheets Of Rains isn't more loved.

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Saturday, 28 January 2006 21:25 (eighteen years ago) link

i remember liking it at the time (albeit purely in a 'he's ROCKING again' way) but haven't heard it in forever.

hongro rating production over songwriting shockah.

j blount (papa la bas), Saturday, 28 January 2006 21:51 (eighteen years ago) link

hongro rating production over songwriting shockah.

I like a kind of production that lets the songwriting come to the forefront. That is, the vocalist is the most important "instrument", and the producer's job is to get him heard properly.

My Bloody Valentine may be the worst produced band ever for that exact reason.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:32 (eighteen years ago) link

I would say there's a logical fallacy at work here but that would give the situation credit.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:37 (eighteen years ago) link

My Bloody Valentine may be the worst produced band ever for that exact reason.


????

x-post

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:38 (eighteen years ago) link

Geir's argument strikes me as a bit of a red herring. I was just listening to "Makes No Sense at All" and the vocals don't seem to be mixed that low.

Obviously, their SST records were recorded with a limited budget. Are the vocals mixed low on their Warner Brothers albums? (I don't remember them being so.)

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:45 (eighteen years ago) link

i can say that "makes no sense at all" sounds like it was recorded with the mics two states over when placed next to even, say, a contemporaneous replacements song on a cd

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:46 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, not really, Jess! Of course, the Replacements were on a major by Tim, so it's not a fair comparison. The album they had before that on Twin Tone - the one with "I Will Dare" on it - it probably sounds better than Flip Your Wig-era Husker Du. (Don't know; don't have it.)

Listening to "Makes No Sense at All," the vocals are clear, guitar is clear, drums are reverby but fairly clear, bass is (for the most part) MIA.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:54 (eighteen years ago) link

i didnt say it didnt sound CLEAR just not LOUD

this is not a comment on the relative mertits of the song, which is great

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:55 (eighteen years ago) link

But that was their aesthetic, right? The guitar is supposed to be loud. My point was that the lead vocal on that track is not *buried*. It's right there.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 28 January 2006 22:58 (eighteen years ago) link

no, yr right. it does sound distant to me, but you can still make out the words.

haha i dont know if i can remember a single husker du bassline.

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Are all you guys who are praising the Minutemen seriously gonna tell me that D. Boon's voice beats the "on the brink" scream of Bob Mould's?? Every time I listen to Husker Du I ca'nt keep the adrenaline from flowing! I guess it has to do with who you talk to, but after reading this thread I'm starting to feel that Husker Du are actually underrated.Out of the majority of most hardcore bands of their era, they had the best melodic sensibility. So yeah, I guess my answer is going to have to be CLASSIC!

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:15 (eighteen years ago) link

How bout the intro to something i learned today for a bassline?

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:16 (eighteen years ago) link

I hated the Warners records at the time of release, but otherwise love the band. I wonder if I'd like the last couple better now.

truck-patch pixel farmer (my crop froze in the field) (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Or the bassline for "Statues" or "Standing By the Sea" or "Powerline" or ...

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Saturday, 28 January 2006 23:23 (eighteen years ago) link

It's not bad production. They have a "sound" that is super-fuzzy guitar that is so distorted it is almost static and thin. Under that, is a clear bass line and a drum that is usually slightly behind and the vocals sound "far off" but are not by any means buried. You can generally make out every word. They tried to sound exactly the same live. It's probably why the songs sound so damn good!

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:02 (eighteen years ago) link

"Clear bass line" - no way.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Sheesh! If you wanna talk about nonexistant basslines, look at Metallica. They seem to underappreciate the role of the instrument, a crying shame that they wasted one of the most original bassists, because it's all about guitars and heavy metal with them.... ..and solos.

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Isn't that the situation with most heavy metal? Solid state amplification turned bass sound to shit. It's either just a wimpy presence or, in metal, this burbling inarticulate mass.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 00:55 (eighteen years ago) link

xxpost - is it the clear you have a problem with? their bassline is usually thick/more defineed, alteast more upfront and prominent, yes? (i say this without being able to remember very clearly now, but everything huskur's saying seems correct.) geir, i think it makes sense the far off vocals/pushed back melodics stuff would bug you. but no i don't think its a production failure either.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Susan, I just listened to the "Makes No Sense at All" b/w "Love Is All Around" single and you literally cannot hear a good percentage of the notes played on the bass. You cannot hear ANY of the articulations (i.e., the note being plucked) - all that is sonically present is an occasional bass range frequency that you can identify as the note currently resonating in the bass. Sometimes, you can make out the changes in this frequency and get some idea of a bass line going on.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:10 (eighteen years ago) link

Just the other day I was thinking about how Husker Du's records sounded real good, granted I was listening to the Meat Puppet's first album, but that album seems kinda similar to Husker Du to me, not so much stylisticaly, but because they are both speedily agressive music with good melodies. If Husker Du's sound is so troublesome for some, I wonder what they'll think of that first Meat Puppets album!

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:15 (eighteen years ago) link

Here's your problem: you don't realize you're hearing bass.

Any bass you hear in that song-- which I just listened to-- is BASS. And it's clear!! Very clear! I could play the fucking song easily. All that noisy treble floating atop is GUITAR!

Unless you're listening to a 96kb mp3 or something, of course.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:18 (eighteen years ago) link

maybe not a across the board trend then, but Dreams Recurring and Broken Heart/Broken Home and some others on Zen feature an unusually detectable bassline. and its got a pretty fat mopping up sound compared to the metallic stringyness of the other guitars..i mean more so than normal bass does and you're definitely being allowed to hear it. hd so fucking rules.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:20 (eighteen years ago) link

shit - xpost to tim

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:20 (eighteen years ago) link

If anything, the split between bass and guitar is clearer than most bands, actually because that guitar is so thin and trebly. Floaty. Washy. Psychedelic, even. Not comparable to funk music, of course. But, most other rock music tends to hide the bass very much in the back ground.

I can't understand how anyone couldn't hear the bass unless they just don't play instruments and can't clearly differentiate the sounds they're hearing. Put it this way: Bob can't play a drone on ONE fret way high up on the neck whilest simultaneously plucking several notes on the deep end (as if a guitar goes that deep, anyway), so the rolling deep notes you hear are bass.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:24 (eighteen years ago) link

an asshole that i can understand. FINALLY!

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Uh, friend, I know what I'm hearing. (And I have a vinyl copy of that single, btw.) I hear the bass, but a lot of the notes are simply INAUDIBLE.

Why don't you transcribe the bass part toward the end of the first verse and into what I guess you could call a recurring bridge (the "I don't know why you want to tell me when I'm right and when I'm wrong" section) part for me. Every note of it.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 01:35 (eighteen years ago) link

I am pretty sure this was more a matter of aesthetic than budget. In the 80s, even small labels had the sufficient budget to produce proper sound. It was more like the "guitar bands" on the American college rock scene had this low-fi thing going. "Makes No Sense At All", like several Dead Kennedys classics before it, sounds to me like it was recorded in mono, and hadn't it been for the fact that guitar amps were unable to sound that way by then, both might have been recorded in 1950.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:06 (eighteen years ago) link

Haha "proper sound."

You're right, though; it is practically mono!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:19 (eighteen years ago) link

From the gear specs I read, it sounds like they wanted it that way. Bob split his signal to go direct to board and through a distortion pedal, stereo chorus and amp that you would expect to sound that way.

Tim, you might try getting a record player that doesn't fold into a suitcase and slide under the bed with your stack of Little Golden Books. The notes are not inaudible at all. If I sat and listened, I could easily tell you: A, C#, B, etc. Husker Du would've sounded shitty with a clicky ultra-defined bass tone competing with everything else. You wouldn't know WHAT to listen to. Not right for the sound. This is why it's not a production issue.

Hüsker of The Corn, Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:28 (eighteen years ago) link

>If I sat and listened, I could easily tell you: A, C#, B, etc.<

Why don't you go ahead and do it, then? I'm particularly interested in the part I mentioned above. For starters.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Well what does the production have to do with determining a good band?! Nothing! I believe this was about being a classic or a dud. Like I mentioned before, that Meat Puppets album is great, and sounds worse than any Husker Du recording, the sound is besides the point, you can HEAR the song, right?

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:36 (eighteen years ago) link

I love the record. We only got on this subject because I stated that the bass part was mostly MIA.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:38 (eighteen years ago) link

I think the majority of this thread is an arguement about the bass, or lack thereof!

xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:39 (eighteen years ago) link

i dont hear any MIA in the Du's sound, Tim.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 29 January 2006 02:40 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.