2008 USP(G)ET pt. II: counting the days to 2012 primary thread 1

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6883 of them)

o man i am really enjoying this campaign and i dont know what im gonna do when its over

joe six pak (ice crӕm), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Wait two years, and the campaign for 2012 will begin.

z "R" s (Z S), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:18 (fifteen years ago) link

theres no way it can top this - maaaaybe if palin runs maybe

joe six pak (ice crӕm), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:18 (fifteen years ago) link

it will be hard to top this campaign for sheer LOLs--not sure i'd want to see more LOLs in a campaign.

Mr. Que, Monday, 6 October 2008 15:21 (fifteen years ago) link

it will be harder to follow in 2k12 when i am living out of a box

joe 40oz (deej), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:21 (fifteen years ago) link

free shanty town wifi brought to you by president palin!

joe six pak (ice crӕm), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:23 (fifteen years ago) link

http://view.break.com/583241

o_O celebrity condescension lol?

joe 40oz (deej), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:31 (fifteen years ago) link

I didn't even notice the </3!

Kramkoob (Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:46 (fifteen years ago) link

wtf they found a pic that makes Michelle look like an orc!!!

David R., Monday, 6 October 2008 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link

And, in a move practically out of Karl Rove's playbook, she dwelled on how Stein's wife used her maiden name, going so far as to demand a marriage certificate as proof of their nuptials.

God, wht an asshole.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 6 October 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

And Cindy sorta looks like Legolas

z "R" s (Z S), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:52 (fifteen years ago) link

Cindy looks like a Mogwai post-H2O

jane hussein lane (suzy), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:53 (fifteen years ago) link

i really hope the google bots put that ad on the story about mccain and the brazilian model

goole, Monday, 6 October 2008 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Or the entire Rolling Stone article.

z "R" s (Z S), Monday, 6 October 2008 15:57 (fifteen years ago) link

who would you rather sleep with? obama or mccain

homosexual II, Monday, 6 October 2008 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link

who makes a better cosplay partner? obama or mccain

z "R" s (Z S), Monday, 6 October 2008 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link

(mccain)

z "R" s (Z S), Monday, 6 October 2008 16:06 (fifteen years ago) link

another new big-undecided southwest poll has obama 45-40 in NM. McCain is in ABQ today.

gabbneb, Monday, 6 October 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Bill Kristol shows his civic responsibility:

As for the campaign, Palin made clear — without being willing to flat out say so — that she regretted allowing herself to be overly handled and constrained after the Republican convention. She described the debate on Thursday night as “liberating,” and she emphasized how much she now looked forward to being out there, “getting to speak directly to the folks.”

Since she seemed to have enjoyed the debate, I asked her whether she’d like to take this opportunity to challenge Joe Biden to another one.

There was a pause, and I thought I heard some staff murmuring in the background (we were on speaker phones). She passed on the notion of a challenge. But she did say she was more than willing to accept an invitation to debate with Biden again, and even expressed a preference for a town hall meeting-type format.

Since their debate drew more than 70 million television viewers — some 20 million more than watched John McCain and Barack Obama the week before — I trust that various civic associations, universities and media organizations will have invitations in the mail to Biden and Palin pronto.

And, really, shouldn’t the public get the benefit of another Biden-Palin debate, or even two? If there’s difficulty finding a moderator, I’ll be glad to volunteer.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 6 October 2008 16:53 (fifteen years ago) link

hahaha jesus christ

Mr. Que, Monday, 6 October 2008 16:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't think the moderator is allowed to perform cunnilingus on one of the debaters during the debate.

Like sicking a little bit of water into my mouth (HI DERE), Monday, 6 October 2008 16:57 (fifteen years ago) link

hahahahanonono NO DAN

NO

BAD DAN

Mr. Que, Monday, 6 October 2008 16:59 (fifteen years ago) link

If there’s difficulty finding a moderator, I’ll be glad to volunteer.

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/original/KristolThug.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

wau my new screen name just got a whole lot more sinister

Like sicking a little bit of water into my mouth (HI DERE), Monday, 6 October 2008 17:02 (fifteen years ago) link

ewwwwwwwwwwww! hahaha

z "R" s (Z S), Monday, 6 October 2008 17:04 (fifteen years ago) link

ban the dan

Mr. Que, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:04 (fifteen years ago) link

COINCIDENCE? [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Question from a reader:

Does the selloff on Wall Street have anything to do with the increasing likelihood that Obama will be our next president?

Note that the two trends — the financial meltdown, despite passage of the bailout, and the solidification of Obama's lead — are coinciding. At a minimum, the market's behavior is not a vote of confidence in an Obama presidency.

10/06 01:03 PM

Kathryn doesn't understand the difference between causation and correlation.

Mordy, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Kathryn doesn't understand the difference between pancakes with extra butter and broccoli

Mr. Que, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:06 (fifteen years ago) link

oh snap

Like sicking a little bit of water into my mouth (HI DERE), Monday, 6 October 2008 17:07 (fifteen years ago) link

ACK STOP THAT

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 6 October 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

(it can't be posted enough)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

suggest ban

gabbneb, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:10 (fifteen years ago) link

suggest ban gabbneb for trying to fuck with Al's first amendment right to Kristolian thug life

Mr. Que, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:11 (fifteen years ago) link

Of Montreal - "Kristolian Thug Life."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:12 (fifteen years ago) link

From the NY Daily News (by way of TPM):

McCain's course correction reflects a growing case of nerves within his high command as the electoral map has shifted significantly in Obama's favor in the past two weeks.

"It's a dangerous road, but we have no choice," a top McCain strategist told the Daily News. "If we keep talking about the economic crisis, we're going to lose."

David R., Monday, 6 October 2008 17:30 (fifteen years ago) link

how about if the market crashes and they continue NOT talking about the economic crisis

dmr, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:37 (fifteen years ago) link

They can always turn back a page.

David R., Monday, 6 October 2008 17:48 (fifteen years ago) link

I can't get over the blatancy of this:

"We're going to get a little tougher," a senior Republican operative said, indicating that a fresh batch of television ads is coming. "We've got to question this guy's associations. Very soon. There's no question that we have to change the subject here," said the operative, who was not authorized to discuss strategy and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:52 (fifteen years ago) link

I mean I'm surprised there's not already an Obama ad quoting that. "While most Americans think the economy is the most important issue in the election, John McCain's campaign said that they 'have to change the subject.'"

Doctor Casino, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:53 (fifteen years ago) link

The Republicans are not getting as much traction out of this as they used to. Is it because after 8 years of Rovian tactics, people are less receptive or is it just coming across as desperate?

Michael White, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:54 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/10/06/afghan.saudi.talks/index.html

What impact do you think this will have on the election, if any?

Like sicking a little bit of water into my mouth (HI DERE), Monday, 6 October 2008 17:57 (fifteen years ago) link

i think people are a little sick of it and noticing that mccain and palin don't have a thing to say beyond negative attacks. i hope the trend continues on for the next month.

omar little, Monday, 6 October 2008 17:59 (fifteen years ago) link

KEATING 5 KEATING 5 KEATING 5 KEATING 5

goole, Monday, 6 October 2008 18:00 (fifteen years ago) link

I mean I'm surprised there's not already an Obama ad quoting that

there pretty much is, that one that's like, "John McCain .... erratic in a crisis .... no wonder they want to change the subject"

dmr, Monday, 6 October 2008 18:02 (fifteen years ago) link

So what is wrong with early voting? Even leaving aside the large matter of increased potential for fraud in voting by absentee ballots, there are two costs to early voting.

First, for tens of millions of early voters, the campaign process of informing and persuading is effectively truncated. Now, there is evidence that early voters are more partisan and informed than other voters and hence are less likely than the rest of the electorate to be swayed by events late in an election season. Nevertheless, early voting increasingly affects the rhythms of campaigns, forcing the front-loading of arguments [...]

The second problem with early voting is that one of its supposed benefits is actually a subtraction from civic health. The benefit is that it makes voting easier-indeed, essentially effortless. But surely the quality of the electoral turnout declines when the quantity is increased by "convenience voting."

joe 40oz (deej), Monday, 6 October 2008 18:03 (fifteen years ago) link

lol what

and what, Monday, 6 October 2008 18:04 (fifteen years ago) link

we must fight this "convenience voting"!! bring back the poll tax!

and what, Monday, 6 October 2008 18:04 (fifteen years ago) link

I kind of think that, instead of voting for people, you should select policy positions and rank them according to your personal priority. Those then get tallied and the candidate whose overall profile gets the largest number of votes wins.

Yes, I know this would never work.

Like sicking a little bit of water into my mouth (HI DERE), Monday, 6 October 2008 18:06 (fifteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.