The Field Mice: Cl*ss*c Or D*d

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (272 of them)
Jim, my mint copy of "Emma's house" went for about £20, which is quite respectable. And the first Orchids single has just sold for £35. Mind you my signed copy of "Pristine Christine" went for really silly money.

Rob M (Rob M), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 08:23 (twenty years ago) link

i sold my copy of Pristine Christine to someone on this very board! for not as much as i would have thought. when i bought it, it was the first time i'd paid more than $15 for a record.. *sigh*

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 08:28 (twenty years ago) link

Going back a bit to your point about re-issues, Matt can hardly complain about people (like me) selling Sarah records on Ebay for huge profits when he could re-issue them himself.

I bought all the records at the time because I loved the music, and I still love the music now, and it breaks my heart that I've had to sell them and I'll never be able to see them again, but on the other hand my financial needs (paying back a loan for an eye operation) are more important than music at the moment. I'm refusing to sell any of my Sarah CDs because it's those I play the most, but the vinyl can go in dribs and drabs and if people want to buy it, let them. I'd dearly love some kind of "Sarah Soup" compilations which compile all the first 50 singles onto CD (and I've done what I can from my collection anyway), but I don't think that's ever going to happen.

So, people like me will sell our records, and Matt will complain. But he's the only one with the power to do anything about it.

Rob M (Rob M), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 08:33 (twenty years ago) link

i feel exactly the same as you

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 08:34 (twenty years ago) link

I too am astounded that the "where'd you learn to kiss..." comp is going for silly money these days. I has assumed that it was going to be pressed over and over again - a sort of Bob W. retirement fund.

marianna, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:07 (twenty years ago) link

Holy crap, someone's actually trying to eBay a copy of _Where'd You Learn..._ for $99!!! ($125 if you want to avoid bidding.) I thought the main purpose behind this comp was to downplay all the Sarah Records auction gouging...?

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 11:08 (twenty years ago) link

The WDLTKTW comp sold about 13,000 copies, I think, and is supposedly going to be repressed (hey! but with a different cover, collectors!) sometime soon. Not especially rare, then. Ten times less rare than some of the early Sarah 45s, for example.

Matt's attitude to reissues/collectors annoys me too. But being realistic (and playing devil's advocate for a moment), he's working with limited funds, and, given the choice, wouldn't you prefer to release a new record than repress an old one? Either way, I get the impression he's really not interested in music any more, if indeed he ever was.

I won't go into the ins-&-outs of Bob's songwriting here; all a bit too close to home. But, cover designs: yes, uniformly bad. "Minimalism for Dummies"..exactly.

Marianna: a Bob W retirement fund is a *very* good idea...

harveyw (harveyw), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 11:35 (twenty years ago) link

I always got the impression that Matt was caught between the devil and the deep blue sea regarding Bob W's bands. On the one hand, they seemed to bankroll Sarah for a while and TBS do (or did, at least) the same for Shinkansen, but on the other hand he doesn't like the fact that they overshadow the rest of the roster.

But let's face it, as nice as the occasional Fosca or Tompot Blenny record are (and yours of course are marvellous, Harvey, any chance of another?) Shinkhansen seems to be slowly fading off into the distance, even a TBS compilation is like admitting defeat, that people only are interested in Bob's bands, and now they've gone I can't see the label lasting for too long. As Harvey says, I think Matt's lost interest in music.

(Of course, Matt could always reply to the contrary here)

Rob M (Rob M), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 11:58 (twenty years ago) link

the compilation should not go for that much, for a start it doesnt fit in the sleeve properly, and secondly its not a jewel case, i dont like non-jewel case cds

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 12:02 (twenty years ago) link

the sleeves were bad come to think of it, london weekend was the best sleeve;)

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 12:03 (twenty years ago) link

He's interested in London though!!
http://www.shink.dircon.co.uk/smoke.htm

harveyw (harveyw), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 12:24 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I saw that in his latest mailout. A new fascination?

Thy Lethal Zen Ned (Ned), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 12:28 (twenty years ago) link

I'd never really thought about the sleeves before but... well... not up to much, are they? "Skywriting" is probably the best of the bunch, and only because it rips off someone else's style (Mondrian? Oh, I can't remember, I'm not that cultured).

At least the ASD sleeves had some enigmatic photos on 'em, and "Rebellion" is probably one of my fave sleeves ever (and I'm not just saying that to make Harvey happy, I remember seeing it in Replay in 1994 and thinking "That looks so cool, I've got to buy it on vinyl too").

Rob M (Rob M), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 12:32 (twenty years ago) link

harvey - is there any chance whatsoever of London Weekend being repressed? or am i more likely to sprout spontaneous wings?

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 12:50 (twenty years ago) link

esoj- Pete Hahndorf from Tweenet has asked me if he can license it, with nicer packaging, maybe a few demos & stuff, which I may take him up on. It's probably just a case of asking Matt; it's not as if he doesn't let go of the masters (there have been 14 Iced Bears, Wake, Secret Shine, St Christopher(?) comps recently on other labels). It's really a matter of how small the market is. If it's just one person (hello!), email me off board & I'll do you a CDr.

Alternatively, I reckon London Weekend, Rebellion & California would all fit quite snugly on a single CD, which is quite appealing, if ultimately pointless.

harveyw (harveyw), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 13:57 (twenty years ago) link

Hi Harvey! "Anorak City" is my favorite Sarah single!

If the comp is truly "worth" that much, I might make a copy for myself and sell it. (Who knows, by the time I get back from Europe, perhaps it will have been repressed.) Although mine's beaten up just a bit, as a result of the bad packaging that Gareth describes.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 14:18 (twenty years ago) link

i like the sarah reissue controversy as it gives one something fun to argue about, a real artistic dilemma outside of a museum. but i wouldn't mind even as we speak and blueboy singles compilations, either.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 15:39 (twenty years ago) link

Yikes! It always surprises me when relatively recent things command such high prices. This little piece of the Amazon "new and used" page for that compilation made me laugh (I hope I cut/pasted the source right...):












List Price: $19.98

Used
from
$150.00
http://g-images.amazon.com/images/G/01/offerings/low-price.gif





Ernest P. (ernestp), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 22:00 (twenty years ago) link

Cor blimey, what have I done? Sorry...

Ernest P. (ernestp), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 22:01 (twenty years ago) link

All better?

Ernest P. (ernestp), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 22:07 (twenty years ago) link

*Whew*

Ernest P. (ernestp), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 22:07 (twenty years ago) link

i like that baby blue frame. looks like a field mice cover in fact.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 22:14 (twenty years ago) link

i always thought the comp was still available just without a sleeve. why doesn't he repeat every other line anymore? the last tbs record was the best thing he's ever done, it should have been number two on the billboard chart. it was certainly his most factory-esque record or maybe just his most goth record.

keith (keithmcl), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 23:41 (twenty years ago) link

every time i think the latest Bob track is his worst ever, it grows on me and i end up loving it as much as the rest

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 21 August 2003 00:05 (twenty years ago) link

i haven't bought the new one because i thought broken by whispers was painfully dull.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 August 2003 04:20 (twenty years ago) link

"it was certainly his most factory-esque record or maybe just his most goth record."

Yes. The second track of the last album WAS The Cure. It even had one of those wiggly bass breaks before the guitars come crashing back in...

flowersdie (flowersdie), Thursday, 21 August 2003 12:08 (twenty years ago) link

six months pass...
has anyone got the lyrics of sensitive? i only get parts of them by listening and they seem to be nowhere on the web.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 22 February 2004 14:10 (twenty years ago) link

See here, alex.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 14:28 (twenty years ago) link

thank you, nick. they are gorgeous.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:04 (twenty years ago) link

They're self-centred and delusional!

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:09 (twenty years ago) link

They don't go anywhere! So yeah he's SENSITIVE, who isn't

Silly Sailor (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:12 (twenty years ago) link

the self-centredness is what is so great about them. because they are true. the following is pure wisdom:

my feelings are hurt so easily
that is the price that i pay
the price that i do pay
to appreciate
the beauty they're killing

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:25 (twenty years ago) link

It's arrogant too.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:28 (twenty years ago) link

so he's arrogant. who isn't.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 22 February 2004 15:37 (twenty years ago) link

Lots of people. But the song makes out like he's one of the good guys who gets trampled. Listening to someone sing that is kind of embarrassing.

I love the Field Mice, generally, but that song is too much even for me.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 16:06 (twenty years ago) link

would you like it more without the lyrics? i think it is one of the best pop songs of all time. the way they employ noisy guitars to make the tune even more irresistible is genius. the only problem is the end. it doesn't have one. the abrupt cut-off always hurts my heart.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 22 February 2004 16:56 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, I like the music.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 17:20 (twenty years ago) link

ha ha - it's taken 2 years but at last a reply to my admittedly naive question - i can see exactly why people think the lyrics to "sensitive" are arrogant, but by the same token i think they are just honest and brave.

btw a number of people are still telling me it's a song about vegetarianism ?

kieron, Sunday, 22 February 2004 21:20 (twenty years ago) link

i wrote a wee bit on them in my blog.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 22 February 2004 21:57 (twenty years ago) link

You should have linked to this thread too, alex!

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 21:58 (twenty years ago) link

every time i think the latest Bob track is his worst ever, it grows on me and i end up loving it as much as the rest

this continues with the latest LP, thought it was booooring at first and now i think it's ace.

the surface noise (electricsound), Sunday, 22 February 2004 22:23 (twenty years ago) link

but i did, nick! which one you mean, esj? the comp?

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 22 February 2004 22:33 (twenty years ago) link

nah, "alive to every smile"

the surface noise (electricsound), Sunday, 22 February 2004 22:38 (twenty years ago) link

Oops, Alex - missed it!

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 22:40 (twenty years ago) link

this song and others seem like they are a determined answer to people who have trouble with overearnest music

i don't have trouble with it, but this stuff seems like parody to me, whether intentional or not

amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 22 February 2004 23:09 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, that's an interesting analysis. It's a bit like How Soon Is Now? is deliberately crass and impolite because Morrissey has reached the end of the road with charm and ingratiation.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 23:14 (twenty years ago) link

i don't feel right being complimented for an 'analysis' of about ten words but thank you just the same

amateur!st (amateurist), Sunday, 22 February 2004 23:19 (twenty years ago) link

I have a very short attention span - 10 word analyses are my favourites.

N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 22 February 2004 23:23 (twenty years ago) link

do you really think robert wratten is parodizing himself, amateurist? somehow i doubt it. most of his songs are about this kind of straight feelings.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Monday, 23 February 2004 07:13 (twenty years ago) link

no i don't think he is necessarily parodying himself but his songs often seem like a kind of caricature of earnest songwriting--a kind of extreme

i find it hard to take

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 23 February 2004 10:13 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.