Dave Matthews Band : Name Your Reasons Why They Are So Bad & Hated.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3063 of them)
Just tired of people's bitching and not trying in the least bit to understand where fans are coming from. Got bored with the constant cheapshots and reference to the fan stereotypes. Please, please, please, sustain your arguements with something other than "uh..they suck cuz they're boring n' stuff." Or "I went to a concert once...but its just not my kind of music so I think they suck" If the only reason that you can procure for the reason that you don't like them is that it's not your type of music, then what the hell are you argueing about? Also, make up your minds boys, please...are we all hippies or are we frat boys? I have to know so I can conform to that faction (since you know, that's what we DMB fans do..we conform)
I do acknowlege that a small portion of the people that post here are not as thoroughly dim-witted as the puerile majority are. This post not intended for the few that actually justify their aversion.
To remark on the original comment, I'm sure the fans are still watching. They're just still waiting for the imprudent, pseudo-intellectuals to say something that varies from the same thing they've said since this thread was created.

Allison, Friday, 13 June 2003 01:56 (twenty years ago) link

deranged duck!

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 13 June 2003 05:46 (twenty years ago) link

"the puerile majority" is the name of my forthcoming book on contemporary iranian politics.

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 13 June 2003 05:48 (twenty years ago) link

Allison, I think that chastising people for puerile comments on a thread designed to attract the hardcore puerile contingent might be somewhat fruitless.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:31 (twenty years ago) link

It probably wasn't designed that way, but you can't deny that it does attract them.

Allison, Friday, 13 June 2003 10:37 (twenty years ago) link

Ha. Allison rulez.

NA. (Nick A.), Friday, 13 June 2003 10:44 (twenty years ago) link

As a member of not just one, but many hardcore puerile contingents - DMB is the antithesis of puerile. That's why we hate him (and Sting.)

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 13 June 2003 10:59 (twenty years ago) link

So, am I supposed to be a puerile embarassment or not?

I think I'm just going to sit here and be peeved with Josh.

J (Jay), Friday, 13 June 2003 11:27 (twenty years ago) link

''Ha. Allison rulez.''

i second that!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 13 June 2003 11:29 (twenty years ago) link

Are you going to stick around and contribute on other threads , Allison? It's not all hate here incase you were wonderin'.

brain, Friday, 13 June 2003 12:23 (twenty years ago) link

I comment on other threads when I feel it necessary. I just thought the ignorance on this particular thread was spreading much too quickly, and needed a slight speed reduction.
It would make sense that the "antithesis of puerile" wouldn't be accepted on this board...I can see that maturity is not one of this group's many fortes.

Allison, Friday, 13 June 2003 16:13 (twenty years ago) link

If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge? If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that.

J (Jay), Friday, 13 June 2003 16:25 (twenty years ago) link

I'm sorry, Allison; you're making a good amount of sense and expressing yourself will and all I can do is giggle at your email address. Truly I suck.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 13 June 2003 16:44 (twenty years ago) link

Damn, "J"...that was deep. Somebody should put that in a book or something.

Allison, Friday, 13 June 2003 17:41 (twenty years ago) link

aflac

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 13 June 2003 18:03 (twenty years ago) link

I comment on other threads when I feel it necessary. I just thought the ignorance on this particular thread was spreading much too quickly, and needed a slight speed reduction.
It would make sense that the "antithesis of puerile" wouldn't be accepted on this board...I can see that maturity is not one of this group's many fortes

Most pretentious thing I've read on ILM in MONTHS!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 13 June 2003 18:16 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, what's being posited as the "antithesis of puerile" here? Allison herself?

Sean Thomas (sgthomas), Friday, 13 June 2003 18:29 (twenty years ago) link

The point is, rock and roll is about being puerile. If you want adult, listen to Miles Davis or Stravinsky. ILM is puerile. If you want adult, go to the Library.

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 13 June 2003 18:37 (twenty years ago) link

(Side point: ILM is not just about rock and roll, so it should be more than just puerile.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 13 June 2003 18:41 (twenty years ago) link

Good point. Point taken.

And I'm sick of that fucking word...

dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 13 June 2003 18:44 (twenty years ago) link

Totally on point with that last point.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 13 June 2003 18:58 (twenty years ago) link

If the only reason that you can procure for the reason that you don't like them is that it's not your type of music, then what the hell are you argueing about?

It's all subjective. There have been many many posts here which elucidate the specific things in Dave's music that is not liked. What more can you say than 'Dave does/doesn't do X, Y, or Z. I don't care for/do care for X, Y, or Z'?
To focus on each point brought up misses the whole, which is greater than the sum of its parts, ie, it's not JUST that people think the music is boring, and not JUST that they don't care for his voice, and not JUST that they don't want to be associated w/his hardcore fans. It's all of these--and more--combined.

oops (Oops), Friday, 13 June 2003 19:15 (twenty years ago) link

At this point, answer SEVEN HUNDRED AND FORTY FOUR, I just want to say that I quite like the Dave Matthews CD a friend gave me a while ago, the drumming is particularly tasteful.

mei (mei), Friday, 13 June 2003 19:28 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.dmbsucks.com/

Jon Williams (ex machina), Friday, 13 June 2003 19:34 (twenty years ago) link

I comment on other threads when I feel it necessary. I just thought the ignorance on this particular thread was spreading much too quickly, and needed a slight speed reduction.
It would make sense that the "antithesis of puerile" wouldn't be accepted on this board...I can see that maturity is not one of this group's many fortes.
-- Allison, June 13th, 2003 7:13 AM. (later)

Heyyyyy...I remember you! You were the lady who said that "A Little Less Conversation" was the epitome of everything wrong with British Culture, and said we we're all mooks, hooligans and thugs for liking it.
(I'm paraphrasing, of course. It's been so long since I saw that thread)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Friday, 13 June 2003 19:39 (twenty years ago) link

It's puerile to quote Shakespeare. So, LOU REED WINS!

J (Jay), Friday, 13 June 2003 20:11 (twenty years ago) link

There's no way that's the same person.

J (Jay), Friday, 13 June 2003 20:12 (twenty years ago) link

Oh wait J in missing the point because not reading the whole thread shockah.

J (Jay), Friday, 13 June 2003 20:14 (twenty years ago) link

My point wasn't that people only dislike them for those reasons. When asked why they don't like DMB, generally, the answer has something relating to the inkling that they are tedious and uninspiring. Another common answer is that Dave doesn't sing with enough emotion and his lyrics don't complement his voice, or that they are too serious in their performances(which would be proven wrong by a simple viewing of any live performance. i.e. Their smiling/communicating through facial expressions, dancing around, and the palpable exhibit of their passion for music.)
It's easy to critique music by saying things other than "I don't like "X, Y, or Z". I'll use Linkin Park as an example, since they seem to be the band that I can effortlessly critsize. "Linkin Park has unadorned riffs and uses minimal effort in their music. Their use of rap intermingled with faux rock is extremely overrated." Easy as that.
My arguement: Give me a concept that is validated, and I'll give you acknowledgement. I want an argument, just without the substandardized interpretation.
I don't think I should be a necessity to be juvenile in my posts in order to be somewhat appreciated. I'm aware that this thread has been turned into a kiddiefest. Nevertheless, I'm sure you can find a scrap of maturity somewhere.

Allison, Friday, 13 June 2003 22:29 (twenty years ago) link

"Allison" in demanding the objective from the subjective shockah!

J (Jay), Friday, 13 June 2003 22:58 (twenty years ago) link

huh uh uh huh uh uh "deranged duck"

Beavis, Friday, 13 June 2003 23:17 (twenty years ago) link

Despite the fact that your "rational reasons" for disliking Linkin Park boil down to "I don't like their unadorned riffs or the minimal effort they put into their music, and I REALLY don't like like their mix of rap with faux rock", I will list my reasons for not being into Dave Matthews band in your format:

- The timbre of Dave's voice is often extraordinarily ugly. He sounds like he's trying to form all of his vowels with the roof of his mouth.

- The fiddle-timbre of the violin grates against the horns, making it nigh-impossible for them to play in tune together.

- Their songs register to my ears as very safe. They never take any extreme or unpredictable turns; in fact, you could probably find the basic chord progressions of most of the songs in a second-semester theory class. I understand that a huge reason for this is to give a solid foundation on which to solo, but the solos don't sparkle or impress.

- I've never heard them let their bass player get seriously ill. Given how great I think their bass player might be, this is criminal.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 14 June 2003 01:44 (twenty years ago) link

see one problem with dmb for me, is unlike alot of their peers who had at least one element I could buy into wholeheartedly no matter what I thought of the whole (Spin Doctors' drummer, Darius Rucker's voice - I'm a sucker for baritones, same weakness with Pearl Jam), dmb don't have any one particular guy about whom I can say 'damn, this song might suck but that one muhfuh can ______!' < /rayburn>. I'm generally looking for cheap thrills, and if I can manage selective hearing well enough to enjoy !!! despite the vocals I could probably figure out a way to enjoy dmb, if there was something for my ear to latch onto.

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 14 June 2003 01:53 (twenty years ago) link

alison, essentially you did the exact thing against Linkin Park as was done against DMB, ie, you said 'I don't care for X and Y and linkin park does X and Y'. It seems as if an arguement is only 'rational' to you if you agree with it.

oops (Oops), Saturday, 14 June 2003 05:08 (twenty years ago) link

She said the reasons and explained why she didn't like them because of those reasons. That was her point if you weren't paying attention. Everyone else's reasons were "they're boring, dont like dave's voice, or they dont have enthuisiasm on stage."
Their bass player does have solos and parts in songs where he gets "ill". They do take risks, just not as much music wise as it is timing and tempo. There is always a HUGE possibility of someone majorly screwing up since they play different sets, and often different versions of a song every concert...but they don't. There's just another example of someone talking about what what they dont know.

paige, Saturday, 14 June 2003 10:25 (twenty years ago) link

''Everyone else's reasons were "they're boring, dont like dave's voice, or they dont have enthuisiasm on stage."''

have you actually read dan's post?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 14 June 2003 11:29 (twenty years ago) link

Their bass player does have solos and parts in songs where he gets "ill".

Point me at a song.

They do take risks, just not as much music wise as it is timing and tempo.

Point me at a song.

Clearly I'm not going to take your word for anything because I heard their first two albums and was not impressed enough to pursue them any further, largely because of the reasons I listed.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:18 (twenty years ago) link

- I've never heard them let their bass player get seriously ill. Given how great I think their bass player might be, this is criminal

Dan, no lie, that's a beautiful piece of criticism right there.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 14 June 2003 13:19 (twenty years ago) link

Their bass player does have solos and parts in songs where he gets "ill".
By the way, I suspect he doesn't mean getting "violently" ill. (Y'know, like the listeners.)

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Saturday, 14 June 2003 17:11 (twenty years ago) link

oh come on now that's just silly

dave q, Saturday, 14 June 2003 17:34 (twenty years ago) link

If you can acquire any live show that wasn't recorded for a DVD or CD and commercially sold, even if you scuttle haphazardly through songs, I'm confident that you will detect songs that demonstrate these qualities.  I'll get back to you on specific songs since I don't have my recordings at hand.
You do understand that, fundamentlly, you are saying violins don't merge well with woodwinds?  And you realize that there are about 102 million composers that wouldn't be in accord with that statement?  Just warning you...in case you get mugged by an individual clenching a baton, that may be their rationale.
I still can't grasp that people are so critical of such an eminent style music that they have no perception or knowledge of beyond that of a few CD's, singles, or unfounded information from unreliable sources.

allison, Saturday, 14 June 2003 19:58 (twenty years ago) link

like your Linkin Park review?

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 14 June 2003 20:01 (twenty years ago) link

I still can't grasp that people are so critical of such an eminent style music that they have no perception or knowledge of beyond that of a few CD's, singles, or unfounded information from unreliable sources.

Should it require more than a few CDs and singles to form an opinion of this band? If their readily available material (presumably the music the band felt most satisfied with to represent them) fails to create a favorable impression, why do you have such a seemingly damn hard time fathoming how -- for even a nanosecond -- that you may actually indeed be mistaken in your assertion that the DMB's music is anything other than bog-fucking-standard?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 14 June 2003 20:07 (twenty years ago) link

cuz, unlike other bands (eg. linkin park), dmb require a thourough, constant, and complete familiarity with their music before you can begin to question their greatness (with the catch 22 being if you question dmb's greatness you haven't listened to 'enough' dmb).

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 14 June 2003 20:20 (twenty years ago) link

Allison hurrah for you for fighting for the band you love! I mean that and am not being sarcastic. I do think, though, that James and Alex have a point: how much DMB does a person need to have heard before it's fair to say that he's got a reasonable understanding of their sound? I think it's a little silly to say "you haven't heard all their music" as if that were a good dismissal of criticism. Think of music that you think is ass: have you heard everything by the bands you think of as some seriously suck-ass bands, or do you hear at most an album or two and go "yeesh! shit sandwiches!"

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 14 June 2003 20:29 (twenty years ago) link

No sir, I've drudged through a linkin park concert. My review was actually munificent when compared to what they produce. Honestly...do you think they deserve the praise they get?
I never said you have to hear everything in order to have an opinion of them, and I don't appreciate the amplification of every statement I make. AGAIN, I will say it. Listening to a band and determining that you do not like them is one thing. Criticising the band for technical, lyrical, or any other intangible factors when you aren't entirely informed is a totally different animal.
I can't argue if you just don't like them, it's your right to form an opinion. I'm not fond of a lot of bands, but if I haven't experienced them in their entirety then I do not pass jugement on them...particularly to their fans who obviously know more about them that I do.
I don't remember (and don't care to look) who posted earlier about the basic chord progression or something reminiscent of their compositions being musically undemanding or challenging. I've played guitar since I was 7 and I'm now a senior in college, majoring in music performance. There are still some of his riffs and chord changes that I still can't refine as well as he does. Some aspects of their music are simple, but that's to be expected when you take into account that they are typically a touring band.

Allison, Saturday, 14 June 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

I don't appreciate the amplification of every statement I make.

If you're not going to stand by statements, might I suggest you reconsider making them in the first place. What else have we to go on other than your own words in this debate?

At the very least, I think we can all safely, heartily and cheerily agree that Linkin Park suck from a big, greasy bag of cock, right?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 14 June 2003 21:31 (twenty years ago) link

I like that "In The End" song. Needs to be a bit more Depeche Mode, though. (I will still take it over any DMB any day.)

I don't appreciate the amplification of every statement I make

Understood, but I think this is happening because you're not answering a lot of specific questions in turn. Dan, for instance, has brought up a lot that you're not apparently dealing with. Saying that you're not being understood or that you're being treated too harshly when you're not willing to engage further with what's asked is a bit of a problem -- especially if you're so single-mindedly focused on getting US to engage further with a band you like. It goes both ways.

Criticising the band for technical, lyrical, or any other intangible factors when you aren't entirely informed is a totally different animal

If people are getting annoyed with the band BECAUSE of something technical, lyrical, etc. and say so, what more do you want? It can't be intangible if it is there and they're pointing to it.

I'm not fond of a lot of bands, but if I haven't experienced them in their entirety then I do not pass jugement on them

If you aren't fond of a band you have passed a judgment. It may be a temporary one or may be one that you are wanting to note is something based on only a few things that you've heard, but it's still a judgment.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 14 June 2003 21:50 (twenty years ago) link

eg. Linkin Park

James Blount (James Blount), Saturday, 14 June 2003 21:52 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.