Conservapedia - An encyclopedia you can trust

some grade-a word salad there

Harris has been too self-absorbed with ambition and career to settle down with children and form long term relationships. According to The New Yorker, between her break-up with Willie Brown in the mid-1990s and her first marriage at the age of 50, three years before she began fundraising, she had no heterosexual relationships with men.[74]

yeesh

Any word on whether she perhaps had homosexual relationships with men?

Most modern feminists:

• want to remove significant distinctions between how men and women dress, such as preferring that women wear pantsuits rather than dresses,[9][10] even though many feminists also want women to dress immodestly. In some cases, most infamously during the Miss America protests in 1968, feminists have even gone as far as to indicate that female products such as makeup, bras, and heels were "instruments of oppression."
• do not want gender equality; they want power for the female Left.[11]
• in movies and television, portray the men, in particular, the white heterosexual men, as inherently evil, dumb or incompetent, and the women, in particular those that adhere to the feminist agenda, as inherently good, smart or competent (note that this conflicts with gender equality).
• on that note, some movies and television programs, in addition to depicting men as inherently evil, dumb, or incompetent, can sometimes depict women who adhere to more traditional femininity, including promoting traditional family values and traditional marriage (see below), as well as expressing more traditional gender roles and natures, in an extremely demeaning manner, usually implying that they are at best brainless bimbos and at worst gold-diggers (women who only marry someone for their wealth), often with the implication that traditional femininity is considered inherently bad (which goes against the concept of women having free choices regarding how to pursue their life).
• conveniently pretend that there are no meaningful differences between men and women when that advances liberal causes (e.g., women and men equally in military combat, to weaken the U.S. military), but reject equality when that results in more money to women (e.g., VAWA funding of women's groups).
• oppose chivalry and even feign insult at harmless displays of it (see battle between the sexes).
• view traditional marriage as unacceptably "patriarchal".
• belittle and mock other women who desire to have children or raise a family[12][13]
• shirk traditional gender activities, like baking.[14]
• support affirmative action for women.
• advocate for women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines.
• refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying.[15]
• believe marriage implies "female servitude" when it is in fact a mutual bond.
• distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events (E.g.: Henry VIII's wives take precedence in common knowledge to his actual reign.)
• often condemn the God-given order of gender roles, as laid out in the Holy Bible.
• object to being addressed as "ma'am," or feminine nicknames such as "sweetheart" or "honey";[16] object to -* -* other female-only names, such as "temptress".
• take offense at grammatical rules of the English language, like using the pronoun "he" when referring to a hypothetical/anonymous person, or phrases like 'fireman' and 'stewardess.'
• support the homosexual agenda.
• push propaganda that implies that women weren't allowed to be granted an education until the 1960s, and all education beforehand was granted solely to "rich white males."[17]
• demands that women choose a career over raising children without any remorse.
• criticize music such as heavy metal, rock and roll, and country for being "sexist".
• object to anyone describing Northern and Western European women being demure or Southern and Eastern European women as seductive.
• Denounce and demean any women who have more feminine traits and embrace their femininity.

criticize music such as heavy metal, rock and roll, and country for being "sexist".

Love this part.

traditional gender activities, like faking

Just curious, is there a way to tweak the Conservapedia code such that anyone who contributes is rendered immediately infertile? I'm not sure if they implemented that functionality in HTML5 or not but it seems like there should still be a way.

Sounds like the opinion of someone who's in favour of coed submarines.

I didn't want to even quote the one for Booker. xps

object to anyone describing Northern and Western European women being demure or Southern and Eastern European women as seductive.

What is there to object to?

The War on Sovereignty is a term used to describe the push by liberals, globalists, and Marxists[1] to undermine and eventually do away with national sovereignty, autonomy, self-governance, and national identity, replacing it with a "global community" or "consensus" and a one-world government. They have several methods to advance this agenda, including mass migration, so-called "free" trade agreements, and international organizations.

Due to rebellion against God,[2] naive belief in the Idea of Progress, and support for big government policies, the globalist establishment of liberal elites seeks to gradually but steadily do away with sovereignty and merge the world into a single unified political organization. In the process, they and the organizations they affiliate with either attack the notion of sovereignty or redefine it for their own purposes.

Contrary to the claims of some naive or ill-intentioned critics, the War on Sovereignty is not some "conspiracy theory" that its promoters are malevolently plotting in secret as a short-term project. In reality, liberals and globalists see it as a benign and long-term goal openly grounded upon one of the basic philosophical views accepted in contemporary mainstream society.

Flowers of Northern and Western European Womanhood vs Curvy Croatian Women

Boy, they sure do favor a wall of barely-related words over like a clear description of observable reality, don't they. If they just randomly smacked the keyboard a few times before submitting it would be the textual equivalent of speaking in tongues.

"Has taken the lead to reform FBI and Department of Justice corruption, expanding healthcare coverage for workers and small businesses, prescription drug pricing, and prison reform. Reformed Obamacare to provide portability and cover pre-existing conditions."

Many, many citations needed.

I remember the good old days when you had to wait for a friend to send you a link to some rando's Geocities page before you could dive into content this scintillating.

The fluoride-related entries do not disappoint, btw.

Notably, twice as many Democrats believe in astrology as Republicans, showing a strong bent of irrationality and scientific illiteracy among liberals.[3]

Notably, ten times as many Democrats believe in climate change as Republicans, showing a strong bent of irrationality and scientific illiteracy among conservatives. ftfy

okay i keep coming back to this dem candidates article. re: hickenlooper:

After refusing to answer point-blank if he were a capitalist, the owner of 15 brew pubs now tries to pretend to be a critic of Socialism.

what

https://i.imgflip.com/35j6my.jpg

I love how every time someone puts in an off-topic editorial comment they just leave it there, then keep adding more. It's like uncyclopedia but not deliberately a joke.