Conservapedia - An encyclopedia you can trust

http://i19.tinypic.com/66nbrqc.jpg

14:00, 9 June 2007 Crocoite (Talk | contribs) blocked "Sm355 (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (troll - removing God from articles)

For you, ILX

hahaha

Your user name or IP address has been blocked.

The block was made by Hojimachong. The reason given is '.

You can contact Hojimachong or another administrator to discuss the block. You cannot use the 'email this user' feature unless a valid email address is specified in your account preferences. Your current IP address is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, and the block ID is #10476. Please include either or both of these in any queries.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics

http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Wikipedia_scandals.jpg

damn

anyway

check out the key on this here graph:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Wikipedia_scandals.jpg

lol at the sinbad thing being the final nail in the coffin.

what i'm sayin

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

metapedia: the wikipedia for racists

The possibility to influence the language is vital if you want to shape people’s world view. The Frankfurt School and their ideological heirs are good examples in this regard, and have been very successful in stigmatizing previously natural and sound values and attitudes and making them seem pathological by inventing and popularizing concepts such as “xenophobia” and the like. This clearly illustrates the power of language and words, and it is therefore important that we start re-conquering our languages.

Another important purpose of Metapedia is to become a web resource for pro-European activists. Metapedia makes it easy for our cadres to expand their knowledge on various important subjects, and also functions as a searchable reference.

White-Black hybrids

White-Black hybrids usually show strange characteristics, the average intelligence of the first generation of hybrids has, in fact, a much higher rate than the one of pure Negroes, although not as high as the White rate. The main characteristic is a tough attitude to expose violent behavior, mixed race hybrids are in fact one of the most violent races on Earth.

this is missing an entry about blipsters

i didn't know that lord byron was a nazi hero???

you'd think that a genetically crippled gay guy would not exactly be their main dude

Hitler continues to be a controversial figure, hated by many. However some have referred to Hitler's legacy in neutral or favourable terms. Former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat wrote favourably of Hitler in 1953. Louis Farrakhan has referred to him as a "very great man". Bal Thackeray, leader of the right-wing Hindu Shiv Sena party in the Indian state of the Maharashtra, declared in 1995 that he was an admirer of Hitler.
In the United States, George Lincoln Rockwell revived Hitler’s movement by forming the American Nazi Party. Later other National Socialist parties began to form around the world.
In the United States however, similar to any "defeated" enemy, he is painted as a strictly evil figure, consumed with murder and hatred for Jews, and nothing else.

Racism is the realization, recognition and knowledge that distinctive human characteristics and abilities are determined by race.[1] The colloquial meaning of racism is quite different from the natural and realist meaning of the term. The idea of superiority of some races is called racialism. Racial prejudice or dislike or hostility towards other races is called volkenhass.

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/List_of_famous_Negroids

List of famous Negroids
From Metapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(edit) List

* Martin Luther King
* Barack Obama
* Nelson Mandela
* Kofi Annan
* Wallace Fard Muhammad
* Noble Drew Ali
* Hulon Mitchell Jr.
* Elijah Muhammad

* French football team.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia

this list is unbelievable

Wikipedia claims about 1.8 million articles, but what it does not say is that a large number of those articles have zero educational value. For example, Wikipedia has 1075 separate articles about "Moby" and "song".[149] Many hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia articles -- perhaps over half its website -- are about music, Hollywood, and other topics beneath a regular encyclopedia. This reflects a bias towards popular gossip rather than helpful or enlightening information.

Unlike most encyclopedias and news outlets, Wikipedia does not exert any centralized authority to take steps to reduce bias or provide balance; it has a "neutral point of view" policy but the policy is followed only to the extent that individual editors acting in social groups choose to follow it. For example, CNN would ensure that Crossfire had a representative of the political right and one from the political left. In contrast, Wikipedia policy allows bias to exist and worsen. For example, even though most Americans reject the theory of evolution,[151] Wikipedia editors commenting on the topic are nearly 100% pro-evolution.[152] Self-selection has a tendency to exacerbate bias, as in mobs, where there are no restraints. Gresham's Law reflects the problem in economics of bad money driving out good in the absence of corrective action. As a result, Wikipedia is arguably more biased than CNN and other information sources.

The Wikipedia entry for John Peter Zenger links to an incorrect Wikipedia definition of "Philadelphia lawyer," which Merriam-Webster defines as a lawyer knowledgeable in "even the most minute aspects of the law." Wikipedia claims the term comes from the Zenger trial, but Merriam-Webster puts the first use of that term at over 50 years later. Wikipedia is simply unreliable.

^^ man does this PISS ME OFF. if only there was some way of amending... oh.

The Wikipedia entry for homosexuality is adorned with the a rainbow graphic but fails to mention the following: the many diseases associated with homosexuality, the high promiscuity rates of the male homosexual community, the higher incidences of domestic violence among homosexual couples compared to heterosexual couples, and the substantially higher mental illness and drug usage rates of the homosexuality community. In addition, the Wikipedia article on homosexuality fails to mention that the American Psychiatric Association issued a fact sheet in May of 2000 stating that "..there are no replicated scientific studies supporting a specific biological etiology for homosexuality."[83]

# Wikpedia's entry on liberal former Vice President Al Gore contains no mention of the drug charges against his son.[84] But Wikipedia's entry on conservative Vice President Dick Cheney prominently mentions his adult daughter's sexuality.[85]

conservapedia MUST be a strawman pisstake, it MUST be

Wikipedia falsely smears Conservapedia by claiming that it has "come under significant criticism for factual inaccuracies."[6] In fact, such criticisms are rare or non-existent, and Wikipedia's cite to a New York Times article for support actually criticizes Wikipedia because it "does dwell on the idea that 'others' have 'criticized and mocked the Conservapedia website for factual inaccuracy.'"[7]

# Wikipedia has a substantial anti-intellectual element, as reflected by silly administrator names and nonsensical entries. Check out Wikipedia's entry for "duh": "Duh is an American English slang exclamation that is used to express disdain for someone missing the obviousness of something. For example, if one read a headline saying 'Scientific study proves pain really does hurt' or 'New reports show death is bad for one's health', the response might be 'Well, duh!'"[100] How about a new slogan: Wikipedia: well, duh!

# Wikipedia has once again deleted all content on the North American Union [11]. The old pages are inaccessible, and re-creation is blocked.

# Wikipedia's entry on the Prodigal Son devotes more words to obscure rock band and liberal media references to it (e.g., "'The Prodigal Son' is the Season 2 opener of the TV series Miami Vice, although it has virtually nothing to do with the parable itself.") than to the parable and its spiritual meaning.[54]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Union

xp

# Mathematicians on Wikipedia distort and exaggerate Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem by (i) concealing how it relied on the controversial Axiom of Choice and by (ii) omitting the widespread initial criticism of it.[40]

Wikipedia has a banner to criticize an American treatment of a topic: "The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject."[103] "A worldwide view" is fictional liberal terminology for globalists.

About 60% of Americans accept the account of the Great Flood in the Bible.[129] But enter "Great Flood" into Wikipedia and it automatically converts that to an entry entitled "Deluge (mythology)." That entry then uses "myth" or "mythology" nearly 70 times in its description.[130] Its entry on "Noah's Ark" is just as biased.[131]

Mathematicians on Wikipedia distort and exaggerate Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem by (i) concealing how it relied on the controversial Axiom of Choice and by (ii) omitting the widespread initial criticism of it.

^^^ Mathematical conservatism (Intuitionism, etc.) Note that 99.99% of all published mathematics today relies on the Axiom of Choice.

Keep posting this stuff here. Stuff may change.

Wikipedia, its own entries (including talk pages) filled with smears and deceit, features an entry on "deceit (album)" that gushes with a description of it as "austere, brilliant and indescribable" music that is "post-punk".[70] The word "deceit" has no entry on Wikipedia. It was redirected to a different term having a different meaning, and then this redirect was changed 7 times in two days in response to this criticism here.[71] Even now it lacks a clear definition and the numerous examples provided in the entry on deceit here.

Conservapedia is oddly selective too. For instance, there is no entry on Sophie Garry:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lk_pG0R2QCE

when Schlafly tries to argue statistics, the laffs come fast and furious:

http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Mystery:Young_Hollywood_Breast_Cancer_Victims

Conservapedia is not limited to liberal medical journals. We are smart enough, I submit, to observe facts ourselves and let the readers draw conclusions. We do not simply regurgitate readily available information here. We tell the truth, even if it is censored elsewhere.--Aschlafly 23:19, 3 May 2008 (EDT)

(f'instance)

ah, on my first visit I got tonnes of laffs, then it became uncomfortable, but now I'm back to the laffs.

Specifically, modern feminists tend to:

* believe that there are no inherent differences between men and women and that all inequality is the result of men oppressing women[4]
* view traditional marriage as unacceptably patriarchal
* prefer shirking traditional gender activities, like baking [5]
* support affirmative action for women
* detest women who are happy in traditional roles, such as housewife,[6] and especially dislike those who defend such roles
* prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do[7][8]
* seek women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines
* flat-out refuse to take the husband's last name when marrying[9]

telling it how it is.

when Schlafly tries to argue statistics, the laffs come fast and furious:

http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Mystery:Young_Hollywood_Breast_Cancer_Victims

-- J0hn D., Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:27 PM (33 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

this is the best thing ive read all week - dude gets thoroughly schooled by other conservatives

btw thats andy schlafly not phyllis

It ends on a wonderfully strange note:

----

Norwegian actress and porn star

--

If by "hollywood" you also include Norwegian actresses then you must also include all actresses from all of Europe at bare minimum and probably from all over the world. No offence Andy, but this page is ridiculous and I'm surprised you can't see that.

dude gets thoroughly schooled by other conservatives

i dunno, unless yr definition of 'thoroughly schooled' is to ignore every single obvious, transparent, and well-argued criticism of your argument, and to continue to repeat your asinine points and questions in the face of overwhelming opposing evidence.

motivation and thought processes of guys like this are totally beyond me.

seek women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines

if only we had sigfiles

i mean thoroughly schooled in that they dissect his argument & refute it on every level - you could include it in textbooks under practical application of the scientific method

yeah that is the beauty of that page - the guys arguing against him are just cold-blooded facts-only-please dudes and it's like a thorough unmasking of his his pretending-to-be-interested-in-statistics stance

Here's where I ended up!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honk_If_You_Love_Fred_Durst

the lenski affair (and associated talk pages) are quality pwnage too. second letter from lenski is a gem.

*poof*

http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Mystery:Young_Hollywood_Breast_Cancer_Victims

Honk If You Love Fred Durst