quiddities and agonies of the ruling class - a rolling new york times thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8312 of them)

little orphan annie back there

ultra-generic sub-noize persona (Matt P), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:05 (6 years ago) Permalink

^yea srsly i didnt even notice that at first

johnny crunch, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:05 (6 years ago) Permalink

guys do you realize what this means? the economic crisis is even affecting rich people! this means it is really newsworthy!! it's like when straight people started getting hiv!!!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:35 (6 years ago) Permalink

what's a quiddity?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:36 (6 years ago) Permalink

think of the barefoot girls laying on dogs on the porches of brick homes in silver spring, md. x-post

ultra-generic sub-noize persona (Matt P), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:36 (6 years ago) Permalink

“I feel as if I am finally at home,” she exclaimed as soon as we moved into the house. She could settle down and do the things she had always been best at: making a new home, nurturing her children and loving me.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:38 (6 years ago) Permalink

But eventually:

The frosted-crystal shade on a beloved Italian floor lamp was cracked. The dog had gnawed the leg on her Biedermeier chair.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:44 (6 years ago) Permalink

The Khaki Class

man, i love collages (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:44 (6 years ago) Permalink

Thread of ;_;

Dom P's Rusty Nuts (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:46 (6 years ago) Permalink

I can't really join in on any rich-people schadenfreude here, because it sounds to me like this guy is not of some far-distant social class, and the $4k alimony/child-support + take-home of $2.75k equation actually does sound pretty rough to me -- what's weird about it is to read the contention that this felt like a natural situation to wind up falling into; I suppose at that age and social situation it might, but of the many people I know who take home around that much money a month, I can surely tell you that not that many of them expect homes on it, and I'm not even just talking about the ones in New York.

nabisco, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:52 (6 years ago) Permalink

I mean, judging by that equation we might estimate an income in the general neighborhood of $100k a year, which is certainly pleasant but not some sort of distant class of wealth and privilege whose travails I might comfortably laugh at.

nabisco, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:54 (6 years ago) Permalink

On one hand -- ugh, fuck this guy.

On the other hand, I have to give him credit for a little reality check. I just paid off the last of my credit card debt and I have a fixed rate mortgage, so I need to quit waking up at 4 a.m. and worrying about money.

On the 3rd hand, nice work of him to pull his story together and sell it to W.W. Norton.

resistance is feudal (WmC), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:56 (6 years ago) Permalink

you've got three hands? surely you can swing a book deal out of that.

macaulay culkin's bukkake shocker (bug), Friday, 15 May 2009 00:04 (6 years ago) Permalink

it's true, nabisco - he never really was that rich, especially by the standards of the new york times - but he sure lives and writes like he is. which is of course where the trouble started. getting a monthly keelhaul from the ex didn't help, either - i wonder if he writes about that in his book? - but i think this man's most basic problem was imagining that a take-home of $2500 monthly was enough to buy a half-mil pile. it's enough to make a casual reader think that the financial crisis really is a result of damn fools like him. in any case, this thread isn't for schadenfreude per se - but don't let that stop you - it's a record of what kinds of voices the new york times tends to lean on.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 00:44 (6 years ago) Permalink

i'm struck by his weaselly evasion of responsibility - despite the mea culpa undertones, he makes his wonderful new lady friend sound like a spendthrift bitch and says that his total lack of financial awareness was a symptom of the "same infection" that brought low the titans of industry. fat chance, ed.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 00:47 (6 years ago) Permalink

i think this man's most basic problem was imagining that a take-home of $2500 monthly was enough to buy a half-mil pile

not enough OTM in the world for this

butt-rock miyagi (rogermexico.), Friday, 15 May 2009 01:22 (6 years ago) Permalink

loooool @ tracer hand: voice of the underclass

(Palm) springs sprungs (Lamp), Friday, 15 May 2009 01:26 (6 years ago) Permalink

I had assumed we would start by renting a house or an apartment, but it quickly became clear that it was almost easier to borrow a half-million dollars and buy something.

languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Friday, 15 May 2009 01:28 (6 years ago) Permalink

n.e.way: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/garden/14aaron.html

ny times does seem to have a thing for pictures of the sprawled daughters of the leisure class in front of their itlianate mansions

(Palm) springs sprungs (Lamp), Friday, 15 May 2009 01:29 (6 years ago) Permalink

sorry Lamp i missed the part where you had a point

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 09:16 (6 years ago) Permalink

my takeaway from this article is that our "elite" journos are often just as ignorant and greedy as the rest of us humps -- not to mention that i feel a bit smug seeing how shitty the media's coverage of the whole real estate/subprime mess was.

Pull Slinky and Make Me Fart (Eisbaer), Friday, 15 May 2009 14:40 (6 years ago) Permalink

The Khaki Class

lol South

"the whale saw her" (gabbneb), Friday, 15 May 2009 14:45 (6 years ago) Permalink

i don't know crap about this guy, nor do i care, BUT

when i was 22 i dated this very cute but not-very-smart guy. it was long distance, so we wrote a lot of letters (this was in the lol 90s). in one letter he told me that being with me made him feel "quidity". i smugly laughed a little because i figured that he meant "tranquility" and wow was this guy adorable for not being able to use a dictionary. then i looked up the word "quidity" and realized that it was real (although not what he meant, i am 100% sure)

this thread is the first time i have ever actually seen anyone use this word. the end.

figgy pudding (La Lechera), Friday, 15 May 2009 14:46 (6 years ago) Permalink

maybe he was like "wow she thinks my made-up word means something.. what a dim-bulb"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 15:08 (6 years ago) Permalink

what do you think he actually meant?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 15:09 (6 years ago) Permalink

pretty sure he meant tranquility, like comfort (i remember this from context, but really this was a long time ago and i can't remember much about the situation aside from this strange misused word)

figgy pudding (La Lechera), Friday, 15 May 2009 15:14 (6 years ago) Permalink

Megan McArdle on the piece. Judge for yourself.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:19 (6 years ago) Permalink

Actually I kind of like her points?

But not someone who should be dead anyway (Laurel), Friday, 15 May 2009 16:28 (6 years ago) Permalink

ya i mean... not really sure why this piece is as contempt-worthy as some are making it out to be. it's kind of brutally depressing.

s1ocki, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:29 (6 years ago) Permalink

It is in a 'there-but-for' sense for sure. Not that I was ever going to try and be an economics reporter for the NY Times, but as time has passed I'm beginning to think the soundest piece of advice I've ever received in regard to writing was something J. D. Considine told me years ago -- 1993 or so -- in response to a random e-mail or two I sent him. He pretty much said, "Freelancing and journalism is very hard work and you should only pursue it on a full-time basis if you are willing to stick to that level." I'm honestly glad I heeded that and I think what you see in both pieces, regardless of whatever else feeds into their respective situations, reflects that.

At the same time, I'm trying to put my finger on what still jars about McArdle's response and it seems to be this sense of keeping up with the Joneses as paramount driving factor/potential excuse. At what point is leisure travelling to Europe, for instance, a 'minimum necessity' -- and I speak as one who's been there a number of times now. Still, I realize it's a sliding scale, says the person who has participated in a CSA thing with a local farmer for some years now.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:37 (6 years ago) Permalink

Literal translation: quiddity = whatness

anatol_merklich, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:43 (6 years ago) Permalink

Ned, I read her response as being more about the foolhardiness of ever thinking ANY of those things are necessities. She seems to be (gently) chiding that whole tendency?

But not someone who should be dead anyway (Laurel), Friday, 15 May 2009 16:50 (6 years ago) Permalink

Yah... she's just sayin' that you hang with people for whom this is true, you wake up with fleas

butt-rock miyagi (rogermexico.), Friday, 15 May 2009 17:17 (6 years ago) Permalink

I think maybe something to add to McArdle's response is that we have this general cultural tendency to view attention as somehow related to money, a connection that really falls apart when it comes to writers of all sorts -- it's very easy to withhold sympathy from people writing about their woes in public, as if they're coming from a position of privilege or just courting attention, but in plenty of cases they don't have much concrete privilege and writing about their experiences is just, you know, work.

he never really was that rich, especially by the standards of the new york times - but he sure lives and writes like he is. which is of course where the trouble started. getting a monthly keelhaul from the ex didn't help, either - i wonder if he writes about that in his book? - but i think this man's most basic problem was imagining that a take-home of $2500 monthly was enough to buy a half-mil pile.

Yeah, exactly -- although if I had to summarize a problem here it would basically be that a middle-aged family-man homeowner with a decent salary expected to continue living like a middle-aged family-man homeowner with a decent salary, even after a divorce that meant the bulk of his income was going to support a family home occupied by other people. This is an unrealistic and dumb expectation to seriously act on -- you'd think that $4k would be a good monthly reminder that situations done changed -- but I can totally have sympathy for the situation itself; that would suck. It would be painful to have to support the family home you used to live in and have to support yourself and your new family on a fraction of what you're earning.

nabisco, Friday, 15 May 2009 17:47 (6 years ago) Permalink

The other thing is that -- while he can't and doesn't come out and say this directly -- his one list of charges makes me suspect a bunch of money was getting borrowed to maintain a certain lifestyle for the kids

nabisco, Friday, 15 May 2009 18:00 (6 years ago) Permalink

I thought he said that very directly just by listing all those expenses! (I note though that he does seem to say even more directly that his wife did that too.)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 May 2009 18:02 (6 years ago) Permalink

Haha yeah, I guess the unsayable "direct" thing I had in mind was like "these KIDS were bankrupting us (that's right, Alex, I'm talking about you)"

I was going to jump past boggling at the beach house rental and wonder about the $700 at J. Crew, but I guess if you needed, like, one good suit and some decent sweaters for Christmas presents ... the world really does hold you to your socio-economic status, doesn't it -- even beyond nobody wanting to be the guy who gets divorced and suddenly has to start showing up to work in cheap suits, it'd be tough to be the guy making $100k who's like "I got you a candy bar for Christmas!"

nabisco, Friday, 15 May 2009 18:22 (6 years ago) Permalink

yeah the erm narrative here is anyways at least partly "but banking professionals who should be my Friends and Advisors assured us it would be alright!"?

However fishy such blanket blame is in general, I'm not sure it's entirely misplaced re how things rolled out this cycle. At one point around 2006, I momentarily had a crazy amount of money in my account due to family property reorg stuff, and was by phone promptly invited to an "advisement meeting" with a dude at my bank, who tried to convince me he had the correct %ages I should place my assets in (all mediated by said bank, obv). (I still was in net debt though!) I was all very cynical and noncommittal, which is not due to my deep insight or anything, just because my current boss worked in a bank in the early 00s and has spilled much shit on how those outfits operate(d?). (My fave morsel: the guys who construct the deals don't actually inform the salespeople abt all potential downsides and builtin fees, as this may hurt their sales!)

I don't think this guy deserves much point-and-laugh, btw, though it is obv somewhat funny he writes on economics.

anatol_merklich, Friday, 15 May 2009 18:55 (6 years ago) Permalink

I don't know that that's a big surface narrative, given the "I wasn't duped" and the bit about how a banking professional's refinancing maneuvers actually worked to carve down some debt

nabisco, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:00 (6 years ago) Permalink

it's about even someone who should have known better made some really dumb mistakes, which is always a story worth telling imo

s1ocki, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:11 (6 years ago) Permalink

Literal translation: quiddity = whatness

A weird thing about "quiddity" is that the first definition, "essence", seems to be the opposite of the second definition, "a trifling point". So it can either refer to the essence of something or a minor, trifling detail? Confusing. I have a feeling that it's a word that's rarely used correctly.

o. nate, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:13 (6 years ago) Permalink

my point is that there are hundreds of thousands of people with stories just like this who don't write for the new york times and have six-figure salaries who are perhaps just a leeetle more representative of the mortgage fallout going on right now - my pointing and laughing is at the editors, not this poor schmuck

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:17 (6 years ago) Permalink

well, they wanted a personal, first-perosn story, so going with a new york times writer... kinda makes sense, no?

s1ocki, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:19 (6 years ago) Permalink

he will die at some point

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:22 (6 years ago) Permalink

can't write about that tho

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:22 (6 years ago) Permalink

That's a fair point, Tracer, but the fact that the Times can be willfully class-blind is hardly news to anyone who's ever read the Style section, for instance.

o. nate, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:22 (6 years ago) Permalink

what is sadder loss or death

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:23 (6 years ago) Permalink

conceptually, I mean

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:23 (6 years ago) Permalink

loss is a kind of death, when u think about it??

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:24 (6 years ago) Permalink

imagine in that picture that the dog is dead but the money is lost

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:25 (6 years ago) Permalink

"socialite and actress" with five uncredited parts on her IMDB page

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 26 July 2015 20:37 (1 month ago) Permalink

lol how onionesque is this caption

Cassandra Seidenfeld outside of the Arlington Club on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, where she has a dinner reservation.
Nancy Borowick for The New York Times

j., Sunday, 26 July 2015 20:46 (1 month ago) Permalink

No one in New York wants to wait months.

drash, Sunday, 26 July 2015 23:03 (1 month ago) Permalink

For starters, adjust your expectations. Everyone wants to have lunch at 12.30 p.m. and dinner on a Saturday at 8 p.m. Chances are the other diners calling are just as affluent, willing to spend and unknown as you.

drash, Sunday, 26 July 2015 23:03 (1 month ago) Permalink

that's a funny starter I don't care how shit hot the restaurant is

irl lol (darraghmac), Sunday, 26 July 2015 23:26 (1 month ago) Permalink

gifs-go-beyond-emoji-to-express-thoughts-without-words.html

how's life, Monday, 3 August 2015 19:11 (1 month ago) Permalink

socialite is obvious and standard code for "married someone rich" or "family money" right?

five six and (man alive), Monday, 3 August 2015 19:12 (1 month ago) Permalink

"bold face name you haven't heard of"

let's not get too excited w/ the ouches (forksclovetofu), Monday, 3 August 2015 19:34 (1 month ago) Permalink

this was my inspirational story of the day for some weird reason. she's just awesome and she looks awesome and has this awesome life in an awesome house and does all kinds of awesome stuff. every story about people with money should be this cool:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/02/realestate/karen-allen-at-home-in-the-berkshires.html?hpw&rref=realestate&WT.nav=bottom-well&module=CloseSlideshow®ion=SlideShowTopBar&version=SlideCard-10&action=click&contentCollection=Real%20Estate&pgtype=imageslideshow

scott seward, Monday, 3 August 2015 20:17 (1 month ago) Permalink

sorry, doesn't really belong here i guess. she's just cool.

scott seward, Monday, 3 August 2015 20:18 (1 month ago) Permalink

She sounds super sweet and nice, and I had a huge crush on her as a kid. Can't really hate on anyone for being deeply into their interests/hobbies.

five six and (man alive), Monday, 3 August 2015 20:21 (1 month ago) Permalink

gives a new meaning to "socialism for the rich"

five six and (man alive), Monday, 3 August 2015 20:22 (1 month ago) Permalink

IA^10 @ that. It never feels good to root for a crash, but wrt silicon valley right now I feel like it's long overdue.

five six and (man alive), Monday, 3 August 2015 20:39 (1 month ago) Permalink

marcos, Monday, 3 August 2015 20:44 (1 month ago) Permalink

At one such party, none of the 30 guests knew one another, but most embraced when the night was over, Mr. Jackson recalled.

most

transparent play for gifs (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 4 August 2015 01:59 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/05/dining/hannah-kirshner-of-sweets-bitters-and-her-omelet-pan-for-the-backyard-bounty.html";>This one seemed pretty tailormade to the thread</a>; here's a highlight selection:

Now 30, she has three chickens of her own: Cookie Dough, a Mottled Java; Hillary Chicken, a Rhode Island Red; and Black Bettie, an Australorp. They live in her backyard in Red Hook, Brooklyn, and lay about a dozen eggs a week. These she sometimes shares with the neighbors, at once an act of good will and a peace offering. (She said that the chickens don’t squawk much.)

Ms. Kirshner studied painting at the Rhode Island School of Design, where she once made a dress that looked like a cupcake, spreading paint on the skirt and the bodice with a spatula for an impasto effect; she wore it while handing out cupcakes that looked like the dress. She went on to train as a competitive cyclist, then found that she preferred the pace of life as a bartender and baker. (At one point, she sold cupcakes from her bicycle.)

She started Sweets & Bitters in 2012 with a focus on desserts and cocktails. She envisioned a quarterly; the current publishing schedule puts it closer to an annual. “It was a really terrible business idea,” she said with a laugh.

That year, she lost a garden-level apartment to Hurricane Sandy. She would have lost the chickens, too, if not for a neighbor who braved a chest-high flood to rescue them from an unmoored coop. Since then, one of the crew, a Columbian Wyandotte named Chicki Minaj, has died.

Ms. Kirshner has other jobs, as a recipe developer and a food stylist. Having a steady supply of eggs to fry eases the bills.

let's not get too excited w/ the ouches (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 August 2015 15:41 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

rip chicki minaj

johnny crunch, Thursday, 6 August 2015 16:02 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

She stows the eggs in a hen-shape wire basket (that she bought for herself)

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 6 August 2015 17:36 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

“It was a really terrible business idea,” she said with a laugh.
“It was a really terrible business idea,” she said with a laugh.
“It was a really terrible business idea,” she said with a laugh.
“It was a really terrible business idea,” she said with a laugh.
“It was a really terrible business idea,” she said with a laugh.

j., Thursday, 6 August 2015 17:49 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

An earlier version of this article and a picture caption misstated the material of Hannah Kirshner’s omelet pan. It is blue steel, not cast iron.

jesus fucking christ, NYT, how could you possibly fuck *that* up?

mom tossed in kimchee (quincie), Thursday, 6 August 2015 21:45 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

oh my god

in the first NYT article about these ppl, it is revealed that Cookie Dough is also called Salt Hen Peppa

oh my god

mom tossed in kimchee (quincie), Thursday, 6 August 2015 21:49 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

holy shit that these people get two articles
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/nyregion/displaced-by-storm-couple-seeks-rental-with-access-to-chicken-coop.html

“It was just sitting there,” said Leisah Swenson, one of the restaurant’s owners and a professed animal lover. “Why not have chickens?”

“Here’s a chicken sitting on a coffee table,” Ms. Kirshner said, displaying a photo on her iPhone.


i (ultimately) lost my (rental) home to sandy so i feel okay snarking here

let's not get too excited w/ the ouches (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 August 2015 21:52 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

I don't exactly feel OK snarking here because I have kept (rental) chickens in my (urbanish) backyard.

mom tossed in kimchee (quincie), Thursday, 6 August 2015 21:53 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

i am okay with anyone keeping poultry but "chicki minaj" and the cupcake dress tho

let's not get too excited w/ the ouches (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 6 August 2015 21:55 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

those puns are so unworthy

five six and (man alive), Thursday, 6 August 2015 21:57 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

One in the chamber,
thirty-two in the clip
Motherfuckers better strip
Before you find out
how blue steel feel

j., Thursday, 6 August 2015 22:18 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

That's a carbon steel pan, not "blue steel" (which should be "blued steel"). I appreciate that the Times knows that pieces like that aren't worth editing.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 6 August 2015 22:57 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

Those chicken names are awesome!

(my cat is named Cat Benatar)

schwantz, Thursday, 6 August 2015 23:16 (4 weeks ago) Permalink

fuck these people

"It’s about us being fucking amazing people and loving each other"

panettone for the painfully alone (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 19 August 2015 20:53 (2 weeks ago) Permalink

they seemed bored and boring.

Meta Forksclove-Liebeskind (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 August 2015 21:05 (2 weeks ago) Permalink

“Money was never talked about.”

transparent play for gifs (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 20 August 2015 02:53 (2 weeks ago) Permalink

How could the RBF article not have been talked about here yet?

Iago Galdston, Thursday, 20 August 2015 03:21 (2 weeks ago) Permalink

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/nyregion/how-bentley-meeker-lighting-designer-spends-his-sundays.html?_r=0

tags: Burning Man, Edison tugsten spots, Transcendental Meditation, coconut water, massive truffles, wine cellar, electronic dance music, life coach

got the club going UP on a tuesday (m coleman), Sunday, 23 August 2015 13:06 (1 week ago) Permalink

his use of dude lingo (freakin stoked etc) sounds like my mom using the term "mod" about ten years after the swinging sixties

got the club going UP on a tuesday (m coleman), Sunday, 23 August 2015 13:08 (1 week ago) Permalink

“devastating” is the word I like to use

drash, Sunday, 23 August 2015 15:50 (1 week ago) Permalink

KICKING IT And then everybody boogies out and Alicia and I will kick it. I’ll give my son a call. We’ll do an evening meditate. We’ll talk about the day, our dreams. My life coach Lauren Zander is all about designing your life. We’ll talk about our day and if it came back as we designed it. We’ll talk about the highlight. Then we hook up.

drash, Sunday, 23 August 2015 15:51 (1 week ago) Permalink

Pretty sure "hook up" is lighting design biz jargon.

mick signals, Sunday, 23 August 2015 16:42 (1 week ago) Permalink

"We’ll talk about the highlight. Then we hook up. I mean, we'll meet up. For tantric sex. Sometimes we'll kick it old school with a few strapon lava lamps but my go to is a naked bulb hanging right between our gently rocking temples of promise."

facon wrapped seitan butty (qiqing), Monday, 24 August 2015 19:53 (1 week ago) Permalink

If there’s anything that even resembles something braised I’m pulling out a Côte-Rôtie or an Hermitage. I happen to like an artist called Shlohmo, and Dr. Toast.

Hadrian VIII, Saturday, 29 August 2015 17:48 (5 days ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.