quiddities and agonies of the ruling class - a rolling new york times thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8261 of them)

little orphan annie back there

ultra-generic sub-noize persona (Matt P), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:05 (5 years ago) Permalink

^yea srsly i didnt even notice that at first

johnny crunch, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:05 (5 years ago) Permalink

guys do you realize what this means? the economic crisis is even affecting rich people! this means it is really newsworthy!! it's like when straight people started getting hiv!!!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:35 (5 years ago) Permalink

what's a quiddity?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:36 (5 years ago) Permalink

think of the barefoot girls laying on dogs on the porches of brick homes in silver spring, md. x-post

ultra-generic sub-noize persona (Matt P), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:36 (5 years ago) Permalink

“I feel as if I am finally at home,” she exclaimed as soon as we moved into the house. She could settle down and do the things she had always been best at: making a new home, nurturing her children and loving me.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:38 (5 years ago) Permalink

But eventually:

The frosted-crystal shade on a beloved Italian floor lamp was cracked. The dog had gnawed the leg on her Biedermeier chair.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:44 (5 years ago) Permalink

The Khaki Class

man, i love collages (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:44 (5 years ago) Permalink

Thread of ;_;

Dom P's Rusty Nuts (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:46 (5 years ago) Permalink

I can't really join in on any rich-people schadenfreude here, because it sounds to me like this guy is not of some far-distant social class, and the $4k alimony/child-support + take-home of $2.75k equation actually does sound pretty rough to me -- what's weird about it is to read the contention that this felt like a natural situation to wind up falling into; I suppose at that age and social situation it might, but of the many people I know who take home around that much money a month, I can surely tell you that not that many of them expect homes on it, and I'm not even just talking about the ones in New York.

nabisco, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:52 (5 years ago) Permalink

I mean, judging by that equation we might estimate an income in the general neighborhood of $100k a year, which is certainly pleasant but not some sort of distant class of wealth and privilege whose travails I might comfortably laugh at.

nabisco, Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:54 (5 years ago) Permalink

On one hand -- ugh, fuck this guy.

On the other hand, I have to give him credit for a little reality check. I just paid off the last of my credit card debt and I have a fixed rate mortgage, so I need to quit waking up at 4 a.m. and worrying about money.

On the 3rd hand, nice work of him to pull his story together and sell it to W.W. Norton.

resistance is feudal (WmC), Thursday, 14 May 2009 23:56 (5 years ago) Permalink

you've got three hands? surely you can swing a book deal out of that.

macaulay culkin's bukkake shocker (bug), Friday, 15 May 2009 00:04 (5 years ago) Permalink

it's true, nabisco - he never really was that rich, especially by the standards of the new york times - but he sure lives and writes like he is. which is of course where the trouble started. getting a monthly keelhaul from the ex didn't help, either - i wonder if he writes about that in his book? - but i think this man's most basic problem was imagining that a take-home of $2500 monthly was enough to buy a half-mil pile. it's enough to make a casual reader think that the financial crisis really is a result of damn fools like him. in any case, this thread isn't for schadenfreude per se - but don't let that stop you - it's a record of what kinds of voices the new york times tends to lean on.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 00:44 (5 years ago) Permalink

i'm struck by his weaselly evasion of responsibility - despite the mea culpa undertones, he makes his wonderful new lady friend sound like a spendthrift bitch and says that his total lack of financial awareness was a symptom of the "same infection" that brought low the titans of industry. fat chance, ed.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 00:47 (5 years ago) Permalink

i think this man's most basic problem was imagining that a take-home of $2500 monthly was enough to buy a half-mil pile

not enough OTM in the world for this

butt-rock miyagi (rogermexico.), Friday, 15 May 2009 01:22 (5 years ago) Permalink

loooool @ tracer hand: voice of the underclass

(Palm) springs sprungs (Lamp), Friday, 15 May 2009 01:26 (5 years ago) Permalink

I had assumed we would start by renting a house or an apartment, but it quickly became clear that it was almost easier to borrow a half-million dollars and buy something.

languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Friday, 15 May 2009 01:28 (5 years ago) Permalink

n.e.way: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/garden/14aaron.html

ny times does seem to have a thing for pictures of the sprawled daughters of the leisure class in front of their itlianate mansions

(Palm) springs sprungs (Lamp), Friday, 15 May 2009 01:29 (5 years ago) Permalink

sorry Lamp i missed the part where you had a point

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 09:16 (5 years ago) Permalink

my takeaway from this article is that our "elite" journos are often just as ignorant and greedy as the rest of us humps -- not to mention that i feel a bit smug seeing how shitty the media's coverage of the whole real estate/subprime mess was.

Pull Slinky and Make Me Fart (Eisbaer), Friday, 15 May 2009 14:40 (5 years ago) Permalink

The Khaki Class

lol South

"the whale saw her" (gabbneb), Friday, 15 May 2009 14:45 (5 years ago) Permalink

i don't know crap about this guy, nor do i care, BUT

when i was 22 i dated this very cute but not-very-smart guy. it was long distance, so we wrote a lot of letters (this was in the lol 90s). in one letter he told me that being with me made him feel "quidity". i smugly laughed a little because i figured that he meant "tranquility" and wow was this guy adorable for not being able to use a dictionary. then i looked up the word "quidity" and realized that it was real (although not what he meant, i am 100% sure)

this thread is the first time i have ever actually seen anyone use this word. the end.

figgy pudding (La Lechera), Friday, 15 May 2009 14:46 (5 years ago) Permalink

maybe he was like "wow she thinks my made-up word means something.. what a dim-bulb"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 15:08 (5 years ago) Permalink

what do you think he actually meant?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 15:09 (5 years ago) Permalink

pretty sure he meant tranquility, like comfort (i remember this from context, but really this was a long time ago and i can't remember much about the situation aside from this strange misused word)

figgy pudding (La Lechera), Friday, 15 May 2009 15:14 (5 years ago) Permalink

Megan McArdle on the piece. Judge for yourself.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:19 (5 years ago) Permalink

Actually I kind of like her points?

But not someone who should be dead anyway (Laurel), Friday, 15 May 2009 16:28 (5 years ago) Permalink

ya i mean... not really sure why this piece is as contempt-worthy as some are making it out to be. it's kind of brutally depressing.

s1ocki, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:29 (5 years ago) Permalink

It is in a 'there-but-for' sense for sure. Not that I was ever going to try and be an economics reporter for the NY Times, but as time has passed I'm beginning to think the soundest piece of advice I've ever received in regard to writing was something J. D. Considine told me years ago -- 1993 or so -- in response to a random e-mail or two I sent him. He pretty much said, "Freelancing and journalism is very hard work and you should only pursue it on a full-time basis if you are willing to stick to that level." I'm honestly glad I heeded that and I think what you see in both pieces, regardless of whatever else feeds into their respective situations, reflects that.

At the same time, I'm trying to put my finger on what still jars about McArdle's response and it seems to be this sense of keeping up with the Joneses as paramount driving factor/potential excuse. At what point is leisure travelling to Europe, for instance, a 'minimum necessity' -- and I speak as one who's been there a number of times now. Still, I realize it's a sliding scale, says the person who has participated in a CSA thing with a local farmer for some years now.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:37 (5 years ago) Permalink

Literal translation: quiddity = whatness

anatol_merklich, Friday, 15 May 2009 16:43 (5 years ago) Permalink

Ned, I read her response as being more about the foolhardiness of ever thinking ANY of those things are necessities. She seems to be (gently) chiding that whole tendency?

But not someone who should be dead anyway (Laurel), Friday, 15 May 2009 16:50 (5 years ago) Permalink

Yah... she's just sayin' that you hang with people for whom this is true, you wake up with fleas

butt-rock miyagi (rogermexico.), Friday, 15 May 2009 17:17 (5 years ago) Permalink

I think maybe something to add to McArdle's response is that we have this general cultural tendency to view attention as somehow related to money, a connection that really falls apart when it comes to writers of all sorts -- it's very easy to withhold sympathy from people writing about their woes in public, as if they're coming from a position of privilege or just courting attention, but in plenty of cases they don't have much concrete privilege and writing about their experiences is just, you know, work.

he never really was that rich, especially by the standards of the new york times - but he sure lives and writes like he is. which is of course where the trouble started. getting a monthly keelhaul from the ex didn't help, either - i wonder if he writes about that in his book? - but i think this man's most basic problem was imagining that a take-home of $2500 monthly was enough to buy a half-mil pile.

Yeah, exactly -- although if I had to summarize a problem here it would basically be that a middle-aged family-man homeowner with a decent salary expected to continue living like a middle-aged family-man homeowner with a decent salary, even after a divorce that meant the bulk of his income was going to support a family home occupied by other people. This is an unrealistic and dumb expectation to seriously act on -- you'd think that $4k would be a good monthly reminder that situations done changed -- but I can totally have sympathy for the situation itself; that would suck. It would be painful to have to support the family home you used to live in and have to support yourself and your new family on a fraction of what you're earning.

nabisco, Friday, 15 May 2009 17:47 (5 years ago) Permalink

The other thing is that -- while he can't and doesn't come out and say this directly -- his one list of charges makes me suspect a bunch of money was getting borrowed to maintain a certain lifestyle for the kids

nabisco, Friday, 15 May 2009 18:00 (5 years ago) Permalink

I thought he said that very directly just by listing all those expenses! (I note though that he does seem to say even more directly that his wife did that too.)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 May 2009 18:02 (5 years ago) Permalink

Haha yeah, I guess the unsayable "direct" thing I had in mind was like "these KIDS were bankrupting us (that's right, Alex, I'm talking about you)"

I was going to jump past boggling at the beach house rental and wonder about the $700 at J. Crew, but I guess if you needed, like, one good suit and some decent sweaters for Christmas presents ... the world really does hold you to your socio-economic status, doesn't it -- even beyond nobody wanting to be the guy who gets divorced and suddenly has to start showing up to work in cheap suits, it'd be tough to be the guy making $100k who's like "I got you a candy bar for Christmas!"

nabisco, Friday, 15 May 2009 18:22 (5 years ago) Permalink

yeah the erm narrative here is anyways at least partly "but banking professionals who should be my Friends and Advisors assured us it would be alright!"?

However fishy such blanket blame is in general, I'm not sure it's entirely misplaced re how things rolled out this cycle. At one point around 2006, I momentarily had a crazy amount of money in my account due to family property reorg stuff, and was by phone promptly invited to an "advisement meeting" with a dude at my bank, who tried to convince me he had the correct %ages I should place my assets in (all mediated by said bank, obv). (I still was in net debt though!) I was all very cynical and noncommittal, which is not due to my deep insight or anything, just because my current boss worked in a bank in the early 00s and has spilled much shit on how those outfits operate(d?). (My fave morsel: the guys who construct the deals don't actually inform the salespeople abt all potential downsides and builtin fees, as this may hurt their sales!)

I don't think this guy deserves much point-and-laugh, btw, though it is obv somewhat funny he writes on economics.

anatol_merklich, Friday, 15 May 2009 18:55 (5 years ago) Permalink

I don't know that that's a big surface narrative, given the "I wasn't duped" and the bit about how a banking professional's refinancing maneuvers actually worked to carve down some debt

nabisco, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:00 (5 years ago) Permalink

it's about even someone who should have known better made some really dumb mistakes, which is always a story worth telling imo

s1ocki, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:11 (5 years ago) Permalink

Literal translation: quiddity = whatness

A weird thing about "quiddity" is that the first definition, "essence", seems to be the opposite of the second definition, "a trifling point". So it can either refer to the essence of something or a minor, trifling detail? Confusing. I have a feeling that it's a word that's rarely used correctly.

o. nate, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:13 (5 years ago) Permalink

my point is that there are hundreds of thousands of people with stories just like this who don't write for the new york times and have six-figure salaries who are perhaps just a leeetle more representative of the mortgage fallout going on right now - my pointing and laughing is at the editors, not this poor schmuck

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:17 (5 years ago) Permalink

well, they wanted a personal, first-perosn story, so going with a new york times writer... kinda makes sense, no?

s1ocki, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:19 (5 years ago) Permalink

he will die at some point

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:22 (5 years ago) Permalink

can't write about that tho

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:22 (5 years ago) Permalink

That's a fair point, Tracer, but the fact that the Times can be willfully class-blind is hardly news to anyone who's ever read the Style section, for instance.

o. nate, Friday, 15 May 2009 19:22 (5 years ago) Permalink

what is sadder loss or death

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:23 (5 years ago) Permalink

conceptually, I mean

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:23 (5 years ago) Permalink

loss is a kind of death, when u think about it??

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:24 (5 years ago) Permalink

imagine in that picture that the dog is dead but the money is lost

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 15 May 2009 19:25 (5 years ago) Permalink

So they signed on for a year, paying a broker fee of 12 percent of a year’s rent, or a bit more than $4,000. Because all the rooms are comparable in size, they split the rent evenly, at $933 each, with one paying $994 on a rotating basis.

this doesn't seem quiddy to me? Like, ymmv and all but a grand a month for rent in manhattan is a good deal honestly and they seem to be living at their means

Steve 'n' Seagulls and Flock of Van Dammes (forksclovetofu), Friday, 7 November 2014 18:59 (4 months ago) Permalink

yeah, there's no whining or absurdity there? They sacrificed space to live where they wanted - which you can get away with when you're 23, and lots of people in other parts of the country would say about people living in Brooklyn/etc..

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 7 November 2014 20:55 (4 months ago) Permalink

I have no idea what their "means" are, mostly just smdh at the NYC rental market.

my jaw left (Hurting 2), Friday, 7 November 2014 21:06 (4 months ago) Permalink

(Marge Simpsin voice): "Hmmmm . . . it's true, but he shouldn't say it."

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/09/opinion/sunday/pricey-doughnuts-pricier-homes-priced-out-readers.html?smid=fb-share&_r=1

Οὖτις Δαυ & τηε Κνιγητσ (Phil D.), Sunday, 9 November 2014 15:08 (4 months ago) Permalink

Jay Kallio
NY, NY 3 minutes ago

I am probably one of the poorest subscribers the Times has, having struggled through two cancers, the second of which is totally disabling and terminal, and I live on approximately $800/month. Being homebound, I splurge on internet access and a Times subscription, although I usually cannot afford to eat the last week of the month. I became a subscriber after the Times paid me $300 to participate in several focus groups last year, as someone who has be a loyal reader for 40 plus years. I had previously been one of the many readers "left behind" when the paywall was adopted. I used the money to purchase a subscription.

I'm delighted to see all the high end coverage of things that bear zero relevance to my life, because I know the advertising so accrued is what lowers the subscription rate so that people like me can afford access. I'm thrilled you can finance the investigative reporting that would not otherwise be possible. I worked in health care all my life and our wealthy patients were essential to paying adequate fees to compensate for the unreimbursed care, and poorly paid services we provide on a regular basis. Many businesses use this model to provide a sliding scale to those who cannot afford full price.

When I see the mansions and luxury goods I know you are not publishing those articles for people like me. You are going out there and doing years of painstaking, dangerous, challenging, groundbreaking journalism for me. That, my friends, is exactly how I like it!

iatee, Sunday, 9 November 2014 16:41 (4 months ago) Permalink

that one has to be a joke, right

iatee, Sunday, 9 November 2014 16:41 (4 months ago) Permalink

Οὖτις Δαυ & τηε Κνιγητσ (Phil D.), Sunday, 9 November 2014 17:21 (4 months ago) Permalink

I asked the executive editor, Dean Baquet, whom he has in mind when he directs coverage and priorities.

“I think of The Times reader as very well-educated, worldly and likely affluent,” he said. “But I think we have as many college professors as Wall Street bankers.”

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 9 November 2014 19:31 (4 months ago) Permalink

we got both kinds

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 9 November 2014 19:31 (4 months ago) Permalink

rich AND well-off

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 9 November 2014 19:31 (4 months ago) Permalink

My thoughts exactly.

Orson Wellies (in orbit), Sunday, 9 November 2014 19:43 (4 months ago) Permalink

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/15/nyregion/conflicts-in-new-york-city-parks-as-homeless-population-rises.html

two things:

1. you couldn't interview more than one homeless person for this story?
2. unless you're on your own property (or in a dog run), it's never, ever cool to unleash your dogs. that's something that pisses me off beyond belief.

RAP GAME SHANI DAVIS (Raymond Cummings), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 02:17 (4 months ago) Permalink

Other areas are still grappling with large clusters of homeless people, which can sometimes lead to clashes. One morning this fall, Cheryl Pientka was walking her cairn terrier, Sasha, in Fort Greene Park in Brooklyn. While she almost never lets her dog off the leash, on this day she did, near a group of homeless people who had taken to sleeping under the trees between the tennis courts and DeKalb Avenue.

“She went over and started sniffing a man who was lying on the ground, and he jumped up and started swearing,” said Ms. Pientka, a literary agent, who recalled that the man threatened sexual assault. “He was over six feet tall and 200 pounds. It was totally unacceptable.”

calstars, Wednesday, 19 November 2014 03:00 (4 months ago) Permalink

Just happened to let her dog off the leash near where some vagrants were reposing

my jaw left (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 03:08 (4 months ago) Permalink

today someone let their leashed dog come up and sniff me while I was waiting for the bus. I recoiled, and they walked away silently mocking my recoiling. In conclusion, dog people are entitled fucking shits.

Geoffrey Splenda, the first Baron Splenda (silby), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 03:41 (4 months ago) Permalink

Pretty ugly article but the readers pick comments are very good, hearteningly so

my jaw left (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 03:44 (4 months ago) Permalink

Guess it's not just profs and bankers reading after all

my jaw left (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 03:46 (4 months ago) Permalink

that reminds me, getting cold out, time to make some donations

Geoffrey Splenda, the first Baron Splenda (silby), Wednesday, 19 November 2014 03:46 (4 months ago) Permalink

1 month passes...

But what you cannot argue — at least, not according to many artists — is that art in New York is dead. Yes, the rents are high, but people are adapting by living in increasingly inventive ways, at places like the Silent Barn, an arts collective in Bushwick, Brooklyn, or 3B, an artist-run bed-and-breakfast near Brooklyn’s Borough Hall. Yes, the finance economy has brought about the $50 entree and the $3,000 studio apartment, but it’s also provided decent-paying side jobs, not to mention an audience.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 27 December 2014 20:11 (3 months ago) Permalink

“It was bumming us out that everything had to be so legal these days,” he said. “Fire codes, liquor licenses, whatever. But then we thought, ‘Wait a second, do we even really need a space? We’ve got five school buses at our disposal. We can go wherever we want.' ” Now, he said, the city’s entire landscape is his nightclub. “The magic,” he said, “is still happening.”

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 27 December 2014 20:13 (3 months ago) Permalink

To survive for the long term, we have to grow up and have adult conversations about stuff like loans and workers’ compensation,” said Nathan Cearley, a Silent Barn veteran, who also works as a schoolteacher, plays in a “void drone” band called Long Distance Poison and serves on the collective’s working group for logistical issues, which is known as Risky Bizness.

Fuck that city.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 27 December 2014 20:14 (3 months ago) Permalink

"living in increasingly inventive ways"

Like in their cars with their children or on the couches of increasingly irritated friends and family. How bohemian and artistic!

Also "void drone" LOL forever

carl agatha, Saturday, 27 December 2014 21:24 (3 months ago) Permalink

“In some sense, the nightmare in New York isn’t being broke, it’s being stuck in a shoe box writing emails into the void asking to play at someone’s bar or to do a show at someone’s gallery,” said Joe Ahearn, a founding member of the space. “There’s lots of things we don’t do well, but one thing we do do well is to combat that kind of isolation.”

scott seward, Saturday, 27 December 2014 21:52 (3 months ago) Permalink

that's really the best quote. fight the true nightmare...

scott seward, Saturday, 27 December 2014 21:52 (3 months ago) Permalink

also: he said do do.

scott seward, Saturday, 27 December 2014 21:52 (3 months ago) Permalink

The silent barn is great i contributed to their kickstarter when the old venue was shut down because lol totally illegal. Good bands have come from that scene and they put on good shows and foster people making nice art i'm sorry the article gives the impression that they have fuck-all to do with gatsby themed parties. Of the many problems with BK, the existence of an actually-shoestring somehow-worthwhile hanging on by a thread DIY scene isn't one of them.

celfie tucker 48 (s.clover), Sunday, 28 December 2014 02:29 (2 months ago) Permalink

What ended up happening that night was proof that it was not. At the appointed hour, 15 or 20 of us gathered in the lobby, eyeing one another and trying to blend into a crowd of innocent tourists. A few minutes later, the agent, indeed in a beret, rose from a sofa and strolled out the door.

All of us followed as she ducked around the corner and whisked us into a building — a large commercial structure, empty, dusty, obviously under construction. With no idea where we were going, we were led up 16 flights of stairs, in the dark, and then out onto the roof. There we saw the elevator room, a small brick box, which had been converted into a cramped, clandestine jazz club. A barman in a trilby offered cocktails; a chandelier of candles dangled from the ceiling. As the night went on, musicians played, an illusionist performed and the assorted guests — painters, filmmakers, an aerialist just back from Brazil — stood among the huge industrial motors, talking about the only-in-New-York-ness of it all, which was, of course, the point.

It is super-hard for me to imagine anyone involved in any way in this making any worthwhile art, but you know, that's probably just my prejudices talking. Tons of douchy people have made great art.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 28 December 2014 02:57 (2 months ago) Permalink

Mr. Cearley then went on: “If David Byrne isn’t interested in art anymore” — in his email Mr. Byrne said that he was — “I suppose that’s good to know. But we are. So instead complaining about the end of art in New York, I’d love to see him save it. Because he can write us a check anytime he wants.”

My daddy won't won't pay for me to live here, maybe Mr Talking Head should.

nickn, Sunday, 28 December 2014 04:12 (2 months ago) Permalink

It is super-hard for me to imagine anyone involved in any way in this making any worthwhile art, but you know, that's probably just my prejudices talking. Tons of douchy people have made great art.

― Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, December 27, 2014 9:57 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

that description is this other thing having nothing to do with the silent barn -- the "here's some stuff in brooklyn" quality of the article makes it really hard to tell to be fair

celfie tucker 48 (s.clover), Sunday, 28 December 2014 04:25 (2 months ago) Permalink

xp i like the paragraph immediately preceding where the guy suggests Byrne should "invest" in real estate to make rent cheaper for artists. there's no way for me to formulate a sentence about this kind of nonsense entitlement that won't make me sound like a dickhead, so pretty much fuck this guy and fuck this article.

bring on emergent second cities imo

pursuit of happiness (art), Sunday, 28 December 2014 04:43 (2 months ago) Permalink

The east coast is lousy with random places semi-convenient to Amtrak just begging to emerge.

The Understated Twee Hotel On A Mountain (silby), Sunday, 28 December 2014 06:13 (2 months ago) Permalink

Drop a few dozen artists into Springfield MA and I'm sure the place would perk right up

The Understated Twee Hotel On A Mountain (silby), Sunday, 28 December 2014 06:13 (2 months ago) Permalink

maybe people don't just all move to new york for a scene. i mean some do, sure. but maybe some people just are like in new york. and they live there and who knows grew up there and work there and also they would like a place to go and make things and share it with people. is that a possibility now, or is it all necessarily going to go to shit because new york.

celfie tucker 48 (s.clover), Sunday, 28 December 2014 07:52 (2 months ago) Permalink

This article reminds me of the early Aziz skit set in Other Music where he mentions a Devendra Banhart concert someone is throwing in a dumpster.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 28 December 2014 15:04 (2 months ago) Permalink

Artists are supposed to live near poor people. Are you telling me there aren't any poor people left in New York City?

Threat Assessment Division (I M Losted), Sunday, 28 December 2014 17:37 (2 months ago) Permalink

LIKE If you are against racism (omar little), Sunday, 28 December 2014 17:43 (2 months ago) Permalink

I'm so broke I can't even afford a picture of New York.

Whitney Di-Ennial (I M Losted), Sunday, 28 December 2014 18:51 (2 months ago) Permalink

arts scenes are the pits

linda cardellini (zachlyon), Monday, 29 December 2014 09:19 (2 months ago) Permalink

1 month passes...

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/01/your-money/why-you-should-tell-your-kids-how-much-you-make.html
i agree with this in principle but oh the execution of the idea

Money is a source of mystery to children. They sense its power, so they ask questions, lots of them, over many years. Why isn’t our house as big as my cousin’s? Why can’t I have a carnivorous plant terrarium? Why should I respect my teachers if they earn only $60,000 per year? (Real question!) Are we poor? Why didn’t you give money to the man who asked you for some? If my sister can have Hello-Kitty-themed Beats by Dre headphones, why won’t you get me the Bluetooth-enabled Lego Mindstorms set? (It’s only $349, and it’s educational, Mom!)

Sounds like a forks display name (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:43 (1 month ago) Permalink

Even for the rich, life sometimes involves things that you have to decide about

walid foster dulles (man alive), Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:46 (1 month ago) Permalink

cf the punchline of the jaden smith key and peele sketch

Sounds like a forks display name (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:48 (1 month ago) Permalink

mick signals, Thursday, 5 February 2015 22:08 (1 month ago) Permalink

real question!

j., Thursday, 5 February 2015 22:57 (1 month ago) Permalink


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.