Magic: The Gathering C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10014 of them)

I agree w/ everything in this article:

https://www.channelfireball.com/articles/modern-masters-2017-draft-guide/

I have gone into every draft thinking 'force dimir'. I remembered liking the last mm a little better, though I barely remember what was even in the set at this point.

iatee, Monday, 3 April 2017 17:56 (seven years ago) link

yeah i quit mm3 after 8 drafts because it was clear that there were only 3 decks (+ a potential 4th in GW that requires a very high power level to compete since it's too disadvantaged vs the blue cards)

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 18:39 (seven years ago) link

shifting dinrova horror down to common was a pretty big mistake i think. falkenrath noble and mist raven should also probably not be common

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 18:45 (seven years ago) link

I have done somewhere from 15-20 drafts and have yet to see a real gw populate deck. I've seen a few okay RG and RW aggro decks. aggro is in a weird place - those 4c control decks are actually soft to it in theory, but I think it's hard to build a deck that reliably curves out w/ good cards to punish them. usually you just don't get punished for durdling for 4 turns and can just jund out the other guy.

and yeah, dinrova horror is rare-level powerful, especially in a set filled w/ tokens and flicker effects. I'm okay w/ the noble at common because it's so core to the br sac deck actually working, and that deck isn't overpowered.

iatee, Monday, 3 April 2017 19:10 (seven years ago) link

this is the only good green deck i managed to draft, needing green rares in order to have a high enough power level to beat blue commons is not a good place to be
http://imgur.com/a/ze7eA

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 19:30 (seven years ago) link

my sole 3-0 BR deck had 0 nobles -_-

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 19:30 (seven years ago) link

there are several different decks under the esper umbrella and several under jund but within each they are close enough to be functionally the same, although for the former there is a much faster WU deck. i haven't had GW really come together since my first online draft except the time i opened craterhoof. i have been beaten a couple times now by GW soul warden / the fog populate / the indestructible populate decks which count among my most miserable magic experiences. in terms of off the wall decks, i lost handily with a strong jund deck to the ol' UG explore/mist raven/flicker/genesis deck. i literally only saw those cards, and in multiplies. i think overall the payoffs for bant aren't there, RW and naya are very bad, and a UR/grixis core while intriguing seems hard to pull off.

but yeah, i did a couple more drafts over the weekend and realized i was just choosing between esper or jund.

Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 3 April 2017 19:42 (seven years ago) link

looking at the deck cider posted there, lingering souls plus a couple anthems really is how you are trying to win with GW

Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 3 April 2017 19:43 (seven years ago) link

lingering souls is just an absurd card in limited regardless of the format

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 20:02 (seven years ago) link

i think it was probably the 2nd best card in DKA, after huntmaster and ahead of sorin. a true mythic uncommon

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 20:08 (seven years ago) link

i recently took souls p1p1 over voice of resurgence. i wasn't 100% sure that i was right but i slammed it all the same.

Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 3 April 2017 20:11 (seven years ago) link

phantom, obv

Roberto Spiralli, Monday, 3 April 2017 20:11 (seven years ago) link

it's def better than voice

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 20:13 (seven years ago) link

yeah lingering souls always seems like the easiest first pick in the format. not only is it always strong in limited, but this particular grind-y format is the perfect place for it. also lots of the rares aren't even that strong in limited. the rares I'm looking out for are niv mizzet, deadeye navigator, cruel ult, olivia, thragtusk. I think souls is better than any other non-mythic rare.

iatee, Monday, 3 April 2017 20:18 (seven years ago) link

oh wait olivia is mythic

iatee, Monday, 3 April 2017 20:20 (seven years ago) link

I thought of another...damnation

iatee, Monday, 3 April 2017 20:56 (seven years ago) link

Drave Heaven looks pretty solid - better than Lightning Rift even? Not sure why the "cycle or discard a card" wording is necessary, unless they're just helping people to connect the dots.

frogbs, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:47 (seven years ago) link

I mean obviously it'll depend on what the cycling cards look like. but it seems like a viable Standard build-around card.

frogbs, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 15:48 (seven years ago) link

Standard is faster now than in Astral Slide's heyday, but I think it's possible. Depends a lot on what the Std cards look like - so far Renewed Faith slots in pretty well

Vinnie, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 17:18 (seven years ago) link

wanted to say it makes a neat combo with Smugglers Copter but then I remembered it was banned

frogbs, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 17:54 (seven years ago) link

there may be others but a little sad to see the cycling buildaround at rare.

blue god is kind of interesting. it doesn't seem particularly strong in any deck that would care about getting a dragon out for 3 mana, but maybe a control finisher in some format? idk, hand size requirement maybe just too finicky for the payoff.

Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 18:20 (seven years ago) link

yea really would love if it was "6 or more" but that seems a bit too good

frogbs, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 18:22 (seven years ago) link

6 or more would be obnoxious since it would come down online on turn 3 without any additional work

ciderpress, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 21:18 (seven years ago) link

right - but you'd still be limited to playing one card per turn

that said I did misread the activated ability, which lets you online this on turn 4

it still seems a bit hard to use. I'm not sure really what kind of deck wants this. It looks like a finisher for the sort of draw-go decks that don't really exist anymore. Skies-type decks can't use it. It's easy to imagine a deck using the Red one, this one on the other hand....

frogbs, Tuesday, 4 April 2017 21:23 (seven years ago) link

nu-Gideon is hilarious, wotc is really trolling all the people who have been calling for a ban on the BFZ one.

Moodles, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 16:06 (seven years ago) link

i think the planeswalker card type would just be better all round if the typically competitive/midrange pw were 5 mana and the cheap/aggro one 4, rather than 4 and 3. they would be less dominant and they could do more with them.

Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 16:21 (seven years ago) link

gotta sell those packs tho

Moodles, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 16:21 (seven years ago) link

remember that when they developed this set, it was supposed to rotate BFZ out of standard. so we're gonna see some weird vestiges of that, like the discard spell that's real similar to transgress the mind, and this gideon

ciderpress, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 16:30 (seven years ago) link

that said, this gideon is one of those cards that reads better than it is. it's not nearly on the same level as the BFZ one.

ciderpress, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 16:30 (seven years ago) link

yea the "ultimate" is probably not very good at all - I wonder how often it'll actually get used

frogbs, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 16:34 (seven years ago) link

as one of my friends put it 'if you control a planeswalker, you can't lose' is not actually an emblem, mostly just a description of a magic board state

iatee, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 16:52 (seven years ago) link

the emblem is more interesting in eternal formats where there are decks whose plan vs planeswalkers is 'ignore them and combo kill opponent'

ciderpress, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 16:53 (seven years ago) link

yeah legacy dnt is the deck I have the most experience w/ and I was excited about the possibilities for like, 3 seconds, but there just aren't enough of those decks in legacy / they generally have some way to do damage to a planeswalker too. even fewer in modern. even the purest of combo decks in modern (storm / ad naus) win can kill a walker on their combo turn.

iatee, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:06 (seven years ago) link

ad naus could play this instead of phyrexian unlife in some matchups though heh

ciderpress, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:08 (seven years ago) link

the throwback standard gauntlet thing is back today. maybe it will work this time. i am def intrigued, could be fun to try out altho my own expectations for actually winning anything would be pretty low.

of course, my expectations are low in general currently after getting a sound beating at the hands of iatee in an mm3 league match yesterday.

Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:14 (seven years ago) link

this was my deck btw

http://i.imgur.com/IojCWtE.jpg

gifts package def felt like cheating

iatee, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:26 (seven years ago) link

RS what's your mtgo name? curious if i've played you in the past year or however far back the game logs go

ciderpress, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:32 (seven years ago) link

I've played one of lamp's friends while he watched before, and I've played multiple of my irl friends

it's kinda crazy what a small world mtgo is

iatee, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:35 (seven years ago) link

the player numbers on the draft leagues look high until you realize that pretty much everyone who plays mtgo plays those

ciderpress, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:39 (seven years ago) link

right yeah. for legacy leagues it's like a small town where everyone knows each other.

iatee, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:43 (seven years ago) link

yeah gifts was a real groan both times. i was v jealous of how much more fun your deck was than mine.

btw i could see your last couple msgs after i conceded but of course it wouldn't let reply. another great mtgo innovation.

cider my username is onami. are you still smh? i don't recall ever seeing you

Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:45 (seven years ago) link

yeah i've been playing on an alternate account a bunch lately since it had some play points / QPs on it that i wanted to use but smh is still my main one and i'll be back on it for amonkhet

ciderpress, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:50 (seven years ago) link

I remember frogbs figured out from this thread that he and I had played against each other in Cube

Vinnie, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 17:50 (seven years ago) link

sounds about right. I remember once playing against someone in a draft whose username was the name of a good friend of mine, someone I'd been playing Magic with since I was 11, but didn't know played online. I messaged him on FB - "dude, am I playing you on MTGO" right now? turns out it was him. he kicked my ass, by the way.

frogbs, Wednesday, 5 April 2017 19:00 (seven years ago) link

we get Cat lord

frogbs, Thursday, 6 April 2017 13:05 (seven years ago) link

also some good hosers for Scrapheap Scrounger, Saheeli, and artifacts in general

Moodles, Thursday, 6 April 2017 13:13 (seven years ago) link

cat lord so strong for limited, getting ready to hate that card.

the throne strikes me as more of a fun that competitive card, but it is interesting coming right after improvise. could maybe be something there for standard.

Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 6 April 2017 14:41 (seven years ago) link

and another efficiently costed large blue flyer. i wonder if there might be some kind of blue dump-your-hand aggro deck here.

Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 6 April 2017 14:45 (seven years ago) link

lol at this 4/4 lifelink for 1w. always watching is still legal right? if we can get white a competitive planeswalker, maybe one that makes tokens even, there might be something here.

Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 6 April 2017 14:48 (seven years ago) link

Throne being legendary makes it more difficult as a build around but it still seems quite good - are there any viable improvise decks in standard?

frogbs, Thursday, 6 April 2017 14:51 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.