Magic: The Gathering C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10014 of them)

I'm ready for a set with clean, easy mechanics. Exert especially looks good. It has the signs of a mechanic that is fun and skill-testing, but not flashy. I think the Egyptian setting will be flashy enough anyhow

Vinnie, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 00:36 (seven years ago) link

I also like the idea of having a counter for Exerted, because I think it will be easy to forget

Vinnie, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 00:37 (seven years ago) link

crashed to earth somewhat with 2 drafts where i went into GR tokens decks splashing white after first pick anthems and went 1-2 both times. maybe unlucky but hated being so dependent on opening hand and when i did get a good start half the time i couldn't quite finish them off and sat waiting 5-6 turns hoping to draw gruul war chant while getting killed. i think being naya was the problem, the white just didn't contribute enough. if i tried again i would go hard for jund, would've traded thoctar for a falkenrath noble in a heartbeat.

however, managed to get back to winning ways afterwards with a UW peach, 6-0 in 90 mins: http://i.imgur.com/3mn4BHP.png

Roberto Spiralli, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 02:19 (seven years ago) link

I also like the idea of having a counter for Exerted, because I think it will be easy to forget

just turn the card upside down

frogbs, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 04:10 (seven years ago) link

You mean turn it left instead of right? I don't think it's easily showable like Detain was

Vinnie, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 10:49 (seven years ago) link

nah, like upside down, then you rotate it 90 degrees during your untap step. that's how we'd probably do it.

speaking of, one gripe I have about the new flashback/split cards is that the design only really works if you keep your library and graveyard to the right of the play area, which some left-handed players don't do.

frogbs, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 14:44 (seven years ago) link

after seeing the other mechanics i'm even more convinced that those are just gonna be one cycle of rares or so - without them there's already 3 keyword mechanics including a different flashback variant in embalm

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 15:01 (seven years ago) link

yea definitely - since both halves are likely to be related and you have to put the Aftermath text on all of them it really crimps their design space

frogbs, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 15:04 (seven years ago) link

i'm also suspecting that they'll be the masterpiece inclusions from this set

ciderpress, Tuesday, 28 March 2017 15:06 (seven years ago) link

Can I just

Gravel Puzzleworth, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 00:37 (seven years ago) link

i'm also suspecting that they'll be the masterpiece inclusions from this set

I would actually switch over to utterly loving them if this happened, these cards in that frame would be actual perfection.

Gravel Puzzleworth, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 00:39 (seven years ago) link

lol now that ive seen the masterpiece frame i can't even envision that anymore - also it seems that they're not all spells like i thought so the gods are in play as the boring choice

ciderpress, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 00:41 (seven years ago) link

art is astounding on some of these cards but i literally can't believe anyone signed off on these title/type lines. maybe on paper they will be more legible.

Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 01:53 (seven years ago) link

the wrath of god looks real good since the art palette matches the frame well and the rules text is short enough to look good centered, most of the rest im not fond of

ciderpress, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 01:56 (seven years ago) link

took me about a minute to determine if there were any actual letters on the Daze one

Moodles, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 02:09 (seven years ago) link

somebody needs to be fired

iatee, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 02:13 (seven years ago) link

nah, like upside down, then you rotate it 90 degrees during your untap step. that's how we'd probably do it.

Ah, I gotcha. Like detain, but in two steps. Think it's still more clear to use the token, if it's available

Man they had such a great opportunity with these card frames but the execution is so bad. too many different elements and fonts. it's like a 90's rap album cover

Vinnie, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 02:31 (seven years ago) link

I actually dig the new frame a lot. I mean it's definitely ugly and aesthetically questionable, but I like that they made something that looks so unlike a Magic card.

frogbs, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 02:35 (seven years ago) link

I'm fine with them outside of the unreadable lettering, some of the art is pretty cool, but these are such a huge step down from the inventions.

Moodles, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 02:48 (seven years ago) link

Oh yeah, I like how far out these are, but you can keep that and make these look much better. For example, the color bars on the sides are unnecessary for cards that are already so hard to parse. Just go all the way and ditch them to get the complete stone look, I say

Vinnie, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 02:54 (seven years ago) link

The art on most of these is excellent too. really dig the simplicity

Vinnie, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 02:56 (seven years ago) link

aven mindcensor is in the actual set as well as the masterpiece version, nice. been a while since the last time they hit a futureshifted card

ciderpress, Thursday, 30 March 2017 18:51 (seven years ago) link

Definitely an exciting inclusion!

Moodles, Thursday, 30 March 2017 18:53 (seven years ago) link

the color bars look like stone pillars to me. I like 'em

frogbs, Thursday, 30 March 2017 18:53 (seven years ago) link

mindcensor is a really nicely designed card. not sure about the bump to rare tho.

Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 30 March 2017 20:04 (seven years ago) link

if it was a new card i don't think anyone would blink at it being rare - "hatebears" almost always are

ciderpress, Thursday, 30 March 2017 20:33 (seven years ago) link

my god, I had no idea these went up to $10 a year ago. I have like 25 of them. Whoops

frogbs, Thursday, 30 March 2017 20:37 (seven years ago) link

cycling duals very pushed

iatee, Friday, 31 March 2017 15:02 (seven years ago) link

these look nice, coming into play tapped keeps them from being unreasonable

Moodles, Friday, 31 March 2017 15:25 (seven years ago) link

holy shit

ciderpress, Friday, 31 March 2017 16:23 (seven years ago) link

these seem better than the theros temples which were Very good in standard

ciderpress, Friday, 31 March 2017 16:35 (seven years ago) link

scry lands were probably better for early game and these are probably better in the late game

Moodles, Friday, 31 March 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

scry lands were good late game compared to pretty much every land except these

ciderpress, Friday, 31 March 2017 16:51 (seven years ago) link

wonder why they gave 'em the basic types

frogbs, Friday, 31 March 2017 17:06 (seven years ago) link

are there any standard-legal cards that would make these good search targets? can't imagine wanting to fetch these over other fetchable lands in other formats.

Moodles, Friday, 31 March 2017 17:11 (seven years ago) link

no but I'm guessing there will be. I don't think they just do that randomly.

frogbs, Friday, 31 March 2017 17:46 (seven years ago) link

basic land types make them play well with the SOI duals and i'm sure they'll be relevant with some future thing too

ciderpress, Friday, 31 March 2017 17:58 (seven years ago) link

man this is the best i've done in a draft format since the last modern masters. i wonder if there is a reason or if it's just coincidence. anyway, i now have 8 trophies from 18 drafts, which is the amount i got in 3xKLD - i think my worst format to date - over ~60 drafts.

Roberto Spiralli, Saturday, 1 April 2017 02:41 (seven years ago) link

roberto, are you still playing 100% online? I feel like you are probably good enough at this point that you could prob crush at some irl competitive limited events

iatee, Saturday, 1 April 2017 02:45 (seven years ago) link

I always liked the tension with the previous cycling lands - play them early so that the tappedness isn't a problem, or hold them to get value later. This seems like it will be a very widely played cycle

Vinnie, Saturday, 1 April 2017 02:54 (seven years ago) link

xp my results are pretty variable overall but i do have streaks. the sum total of my paper experience is playing occasionally with gentleman of this parish call all destroyer.

Roberto Spiralli, Saturday, 1 April 2017 03:03 (seven years ago) link

boston kinda sucks for events bigger than FNM, everything is really far out in the suburbs

ciderpress, Saturday, 1 April 2017 04:41 (seven years ago) link

there's a scg event in worcester next weekend actually. cider, any chance you're going? (I am.)

iatee, Saturday, 1 April 2017 04:48 (seven years ago) link

not sure yet. not up to speed on legacy these days but might play the modern event on saturday

ciderpress, Saturday, 1 April 2017 04:54 (seven years ago) link

I might play that if I flame out in legacy d1. I kinda want to build grixis shadow, looks fun, might want to play that in vegas.

iatee, Saturday, 1 April 2017 04:58 (seven years ago) link

anyway if you're around you should hit me up

iatee, Saturday, 1 April 2017 05:00 (seven years ago) link

http://media.wizards.com/2017/dw466ytu5_akh/en_3zm4wIPG70.png

i like how much cleaner this is than the theros gods while still being a similar mechanic

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 15:00 (seven years ago) link

I liked Devotion, but yeah this is pretty cool

Moodles, Monday, 3 April 2017 15:03 (seven years ago) link

I agree w/ everything in this article:

https://www.channelfireball.com/articles/modern-masters-2017-draft-guide/

I have gone into every draft thinking 'force dimir'. I remembered liking the last mm a little better, though I barely remember what was even in the set at this point.

iatee, Monday, 3 April 2017 17:56 (seven years ago) link

yeah i quit mm3 after 8 drafts because it was clear that there were only 3 decks (+ a potential 4th in GW that requires a very high power level to compete since it's too disadvantaged vs the blue cards)

ciderpress, Monday, 3 April 2017 18:39 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.