Trump's America, March 2017: Using His Inside VOICE

I'm quite unsure. Guess we'll see.

Apparently even Nunes has Russian ties, as part owner of a winery or something.

McCain McCaining:

https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/844672832923668481

McCain on MSNBC: Congress doesn't have the credibility to handle the Russia investigation alone

McCain on MSNBC: Congress doesn't have the credibility to handle the Russia investigation alone

Further chatter that the votes aren't there for AHCA, guesses happening that there's simply no vote tomorrow.

Meanwhile, other fun!

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/business/trump-organization-scion-hotel-deal.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share&_r=0

I mean, this guy:

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/03/23/business/23SCION1/00SCION1-master768.jpg

Mukemmel Sarimsakci, a real estate executive who goes by Mike, or “Turkish Trump."

"...but please, call me Pitbull."

y no parre la fiesta

how do independent commissions get set up?

the Attorney General can appoint a Special Prosecutor. The House to appoint a special joint committee w specific powers to investigate a specific issue. Neither is going to happen in this case, for obvious reasons.

er should read the "House can vote to" there

Yeah but if Sessions is recused, CAN he appoint one and/or refuse to?

So anyway if true:

https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan/status/844673670060630017

What the White House is now considering on Obamacare is elements of what Meadows, Cruz and other conservatives have been pushing for weeks.

Which is so much word salad, but seems to be something that would result in a hot potato being passed to the Senate and the likes of Murkowski, Portman et al going "LOL no."

Yeah but if Sessions is recused, CAN he appoint one and/or refuse to?

responsibility falls to the acting Attorney General (which is Dana Boente, at the moment, since the Deputy Attorney General hasn't been confirmed/sworn in yet)

Swan is referring to gutting the requirements for plan coverage (ie, making it acceptable to sell plans w out maternity care, or mental health coverage etc.) per here: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/white-house-health-care-bill-tweaks-236385?lo=ap_a1

Seems possible that it will swing enough of the Freedom Caucus. Whether it loses enough votes on the moderate side who knows. Ryan could still eke out a win here, just to see it die in the Senate, which seems like the most likely scenario to me. But who knows. We're down to the nut cutting here, as LBJ would say.

Then there's this:

https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/844681983301181440

Referring I presume to this:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2618154

tbf Mike Lee is a moron so grain of salt

Ted Cruz's best friend a moron? Who knew!

I'm not sure if it's accurate, but there's an article in Slate today explaining that they can't gut requirements for plan coverage because when it gets to the Senate it won't be able to pass by reconciliation, since it's a regulatory change instead of a budget change

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/03/a_secret_cynical_reason_paul_ryan_can_t_give_conservatives_what_they_want.html

yeah well Mike Lee says otherwise and he would know because he's a smartypants

XPS Ted Cruz has friends!?!?!

He has leeches, perhaps.

Ted Cruz has *a* friend

A fiend.

Ted Cruz has friends in the way that the people that comprise a Human Centipede are chums

if it's only two people can you really call it a human centipede

The Human Arachnid

Does whatever an arachnid can

bloodsucking def involved

now I'm just picturing Mike Lee and Ted Cruz at the annual shunting a la Society thx guys

To the window to the walls

stop it you

looks like eliminating this minimum menu requirement has been added to the bill, this will probably win enough of the Freedom Caucus guys over. Someone in the Senate should be pushing back about the bill being DOA though, and people need to lean on any "moderates" that might swing their votes to no

i love that it just wasn't quite shitty enough for these guys, and that's why they were opposed. now it has been sufficiently enshittened.

This meeting happened...

President Trump met with leaders of the Congressional Black Caucus on Wednesday, pulling reporters into the room to hear him praise African Americans.

“They’ve lifted up the conscience of our nation in the march toward civil rights, enriched the soul of America in their faith and courage, and they’ve advanced our country in the fields of science, arts and medicine,” the president said.

As he spoke, the CBC’s six-member executive board was sitting on the other side of a table — out of the TV cameras’ shot. That was no accident. The CBC, many members of which boycotted Trump’s inauguration, agreed to meet with the president only if the meeting was substantive.

“The Congressional Black Caucus is not going to be a potted plant or a photo opportunity,” said Rep. Donald A. McEachin (D-Va.), a CBC member who did not attend the meeting. “He did a photo op with the presidents of historically black colleges, and they got nothing.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congressional-black-caucus-leaders-meet-with-trump-push-for-policy-proposals-not-photo-ops/2017/03/22/6cb0e6e6-0f40-11e7-9d5a-a83e627dc120_story.html?utm_term=.3c985e7a5791

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/22/politics/us-officials-info-suggests-trump-associates-may-have-coordinated-with-russians/index.html

Just came here to post that. A couple of weeks ago, I would have assumed that was fake, but now...

lots of qualifiers in the first sentence

"The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with *suspected* Russian operatives to *possibly* coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign".

you can almost see the reporters doing air quotes as they type

you can almost see the lawyers emailing their revisions back in a red font

I don't even know how to interpret these articles

substantive news (is this even illegal?) or just continuing the drumbeat of anti-trump coverage? both?

I don't even know how to interpret these articles

substantive news (is this even illegal?) or just continuing the drumbeat of anti-trump coverage? both?

I assume this drum beat is all about Manafort. Curious if the DOJ is leaning on him to cop a plea if what they have on him is really salacious.

Health Bill Teeters as Fence-Sitters Face Pressure From Party
Many Republicans have been left with an excruciating choice: pass a deeply unpopular bill that could wreak havoc with their own voters, or turn it back and wound the president’s agenda.

idk this doesn't really seem that excruciating

Dems continue to wee themselves in front of company. Time to call ur reps again:

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/gorsuch-democrats-supreme-court-236384

so did any of you guys watch the Patriot pilot on Amazon Prime or whatever? Forget it. Here you go: https://youtu.be/K_2Rx-LEeMQ?t=25m21s

This is what they think the spy game is like. This is the level of competence they come with. They need you to pee in the cup for them, because national security, okay? There might be a cop taking a shit, but sometimes you have to take risks. There is not a stupider set of people you could have in charge of this country. Not even with a time machine.

Comey may have the kind of ego that sees this as an opportunity to go down in history for the right reasons

Meantime:

https://twitter.com/jwpetersNYT/status/844702309301063681

News: Kochs pledge 7-figure fund to back anyone who votes against AHCA. A direct challenge to Trump threat that dissenters will lose seats.

How is that a "deal" on Gorsuch rmde. Calling DiFi tomorrow (again!)

I can't really get any of the schadenfreude juice out of this shit because (as mentioned somewhere around here, today) if something actually terrible and bad happens, with these profoundly, epically stupid fucks in charge, thousands of people are probably going to die.

Also, I realized I won't really be able to be OK with this shit until after this guy is in the ground, because he's going to have to have a USSS detail around the clock until then. So we're never going to stop paying for the professional protection of this guy and his family until he's gone. And all these dumb fucking hicks I grew up around and served with just want to be pissed off about how their dimes go to crappy art and some science shit about snails. Let me tell you, asshole, what I want to take out of MY budget.

Amusing.

https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/844705517851303942

Tombot is however correct re what isn't funny.

Now being reported that officials, plural, are taking collusion.