Star Trek: Classic or Dud?

I mean, it was probably a net good because many of these shows were able to continue on at lower budget levels and editing was much easier, but the flip side is that the show is never going to look overall better than it did when originally broadcast. they could recreate all of the purely-animated scenes in high resolution, but then it'd cut to Sisko and the team looking like an upscaled DVD

Though I guess with DS9 they'd also run into the dilemma of how much they want to update the effects... With TNG, it was easier, because most of the stuff they updated were space phenomenon, stars, planets, Enterprise flying through space, etc. Scenes with actors, such as when aliens appear, still retain the original practical effects, so the discrepancy isn't so obvious, because the new effects are mostly separated into non-actor shots, so it's easier for the viewer's brain to compartmentalise it.

But with DS9 they'd have to figure out whether they just want to, for example, remaster the scenes where Odo and other changelings morph onto HD level, or whether they want to change the morphing so that it'd look more "realistic". Obviously the tempation to do the latter with modern effect technology would be great, but I wonder whether the discrepancy between "realistic" morphing and the rubber-face practical effects would start to feel too jarring.

(xpost)

can you imagine how ridiculous it'd look with Odo turning in a puddle of HD goo while the rest of the scene looks like the DVD presentation?

did you read the article? it'd be insanely expensive to do so for DS9, it was shot on a much lower resolution medium so it's not just the special effects -- they'd have to do upscaling on most of it because it was shot at a resolution not much different from what it was broadcast in

I didn't read that article cos I've other ones where they address the same issue... AFAIK the problem isn't that DS9 as a whole was shot in lower resolution; I think all the live action scenes in it were still shot on film, not on videotape. The problem is that DS9, being a newer series, has a lot more computer effects than TNG, and those were created straight on video. So with TNG, most of the time they could simply use the film stock they had and remaster it, because most of the special effects were practical effects shot on film too. Whereas with DS9 they could do the same with all the scenes that merely feature actors acting, or aliens in practical rubber masks, but with any shot with CGI, they'd need to recreate the CGI in HD, because the done-on-video original CGI simply can't be upscaled without it looking incredibly crappy.

read the fucking article

But TNG, DS9 and Voyager could not be rescanned and released in Full HD, as the original edited programs only existed on tape at NTSC resolution.

Speaking of, while still slogging my way through seasons 1-2 of TNG, I watched the first two episodes of DS9 (which I had never watched before) and it was INSTANTLY a better show than TNG from the very first scene. I'm gonna try to watch both series still, but TNG is so hard to get through right now.

Whereas with DS9 they could do the same with all the scenes that merely feature actors acting

they can't do this, because no film negative was ever cut - it doesn't exist

xp

xxxp let me backtrack a little since I overstated -- all of the editing was done on video, not 35mm, although 35mm or comparable material existed at some point

so it wouldn't just be the effects that would need to be redone, but the entire editing process

best case scenario is that they kept all the 35mm originals, and that after they digitize it all, some software exists to determine which takes were actually in the episode and it kind of puts together a rough layout from original footage

but even then, any audio overdubs, etc are going to have to be extracted from edited footage and... oh god

read the fucking article

But TNG, DS9 and Voyager could not be rescanned and released in Full HD, as the original edited programs only existed on tape at NTSC resolution.

No, you read the article. The sentence you quote says "the original edited programs only existed on tape at NTSC resolution". That's why they couldn't simply upscale TNG, they had to (as is explained in the article) go back to the original films stock and recut it so it looks just like the original NTCS videotapes, plus recreate the CGI in some places. It's the same they'd have to with DS9, except that it has way more CGI shots, which only exist in NTSC resolution, so they'd have to a lot more recreating.

If the raw footage (not the edited final episodes) would only exist as NTCS tapes, they could never update them to HD. There's no way to do it. So they must have the original material on film for them to even consider it.

(xpost to Shakey)

right they'd have to re-edit the entire thing from the original film (assuming they still have it) and then re-do all the effects - an insane amount of time and money and effort

the actual DS9 live footage only exists on videotape and there is no original material on film.

Yeah, but that's exactly what they did with TNG. Which was my point.

(xpost)

TNG had original footage on film though, which made upscaling possible.

or not upscaling but hi-res capture

the actual DS9 live footage only exists on videotape and there is no original material on film.

If this was the case, they could never remaster it on HD. As the guy interviewed in the article says it's possible, only very expensive, they still must have the the (non-effect) shots filmed in storage somewhere.

In storage on film, I mean.

ok, so you're saying they still shot some live aciton for DS9 on film a la TNG but the final edit was just to video, unlike TNG. i can see that.

I think the real headline here is they had to bend over backward to remaster TNG and then priced individual seasons at $118 on release in order to keep their profit margins in line with other releases

Yeah, that seems to be the case.

(xpost)

I like Star Trek but there have to be a handful of people on the planet who'd pay over $100 for a single season on blu-ray disc. And some of those people are also the ones complaining how the crystalline entity doesn't look right now, and probably bought it just so they could make that complaint.

_just_ a handful of people, that is

The TNG Blurays weren't that expensive. They cost something like 40 euros per season, I remember thinking it was fairly cheap for 24 remastered episodes + hours of extra material.

I mean, they cost that when they were originally released. Nowadays they must be even cheaper?

Ok, I checked it, and I paid something between 30 and 55 euros per season for them, and I was buying them as soon as they came out. 55 euros must've been the standard price, but they often had special offers right away.

ty for your support

No prob.

they're also all on netflix ain't they?

ok, so you're saying they still shot some live aciton for DS9 on film a la TNG but the final edit was just to video, unlike TNG. i can see that.

No, the final cut on both was to video - they went back to the uncut film negatives of TNG and remade every episode from the ground up. DS9 would require the same process but with even more CGI work and it's cost-prohibitive since it's even less popular than TNG (which may not have recouped the cost of the remaster) and disc sales have continued to decline over time. All it would take is one crazy billionaire to drop $40 million of his pocket change into sponsoring the project - maybe Peter Thiel could earn back some goodwill?

I'm surprised that TNG was shot on film.

all the '90s trek shows have the filmic look even with the fx

I'm pretty sure that, before digital cameras, most bigger-budget American TV shows were always shot on film? And videotape was mostly used on cheaper productions, like soap operas, talk shows, and lower-budget sitcoms? I don't know so much about technicalities of it, but shows shot on film certainly have a different look on them (especially when it comes to lighting), and you could see that even with old tube televisions. So if they a high enough budget to allow shooting on film, I think most shows opted for that to give them a more classy/cinematic look.

I just wanted to show off my new deep-cut display name.

I'm easily amused:
http://scrolldowntoriker.com/
https://twitter.com/RikerGoogling

And must watch just for Gates McFadden dancing at the beginning:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vT5Al3DGLs

wow. i love how they're all seemingly very drunk at these things.
and goddamn, levar burton is old!

not as old (possibly) as rene auberjonois (odo) who I just saw in a film convincingly playing a 76 year old with nascent dementia.

wow. i love how they're all seemingly very drunk at these things.

Yes, these things always seem like such a blast. I don't know if it's in that particular vid (the panel is split into 3 Youtubes), but when the moderator mentions "Yesterday's Enterprise", lolz at the cast members going, "Is that the one with time traveling? Oh, and Tasha Yar's sister!"

I saw this last weekend, it was p great. My favorite piece was the fake cereal box tbh.

http://www.chabotspace.org/startrek

i've been working through DS9 for the first time and just saw "the visitor" for the first time, and holy shit what a gut wrenching episode. i knew the episode was special when it managed to bring me to tears a couple of times.

sure the frame story was a bit cheesy at time, but it's definitely the best episode i've seen by far

Candyman brings it.

the visitor is total classic

Yeah, it's grand. Soon after this first broadcast I stopped regularly watching both then-current series -- my interests were starting to drift elsewhere, in combination with me moving into what was the final phase of my increasingly stress-filled grad school life -- and aside from an idle eye on the movies I've never really 'returned' to Trek in full. But having this as a bit of an unplanned send-off was lovely.

I started (re)watching a few Voyager episodes, and either I've had bad luck picking the episodes or the series was simply terrible. (I'm being rhetorical here.) The forced bonhomie is what bothers me the worst -- you've got Starfleet and former Maquis together on the same ship and marooned light-decades away from home, yet it's a big corny-joke making family.

terrible show

watching a few TOS episodes a week w/my daughter has been a real pleasure

just watch all the bryan fuller-written eps of voyager and you're good

Bashir-Worf Hypothesis: a relationship with the Dax symbiont affects the subject's world view.

The forced bonhomie is what bothers me the worst -- you've got Starfleet and former Maquis together on the same ship and marooned light-decades away from home, yet it's a big corny-joke making family.

It's worth reading the second volume of the recent Trek oral history just to see pretty much every single person who ever worked on the show continually drag Berman & Braga on this very topic. "By the end of the pilot they're all in Starfleet uniforms and reporting to Janeway like it's no big thing, WGAF?" Writers who transitioned from DS9 were especially pissed at setting up this group that was going to be used on Voyager just to see the entire premise instantly pissed away.

Yeah, as a criticism it definitely sticks and the first 2/3 seasons aren't all that...but beyond that I can watch a lot of it compared to NG.