U.S. Supreme Court: Post-Nino Edition

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2755 of them)

jesus christ

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:16 (seven years ago) link

sucks to be this guy as now the ruthless dem minority will do everything they can to block his nomination even if it is blatantly unconstitutional right

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:18 (seven years ago) link

*confirmation

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:18 (seven years ago) link

He'll need 8 Dem votes to get his seat, not sure who those would be beyond some of the more obvious suspects

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:19 (seven years ago) link

Ugh, makes me sick to my stomach every time this thread is bumped, that this bullshit the GOP pulled worked. I don't think I can read anything about the supreme court in the next four to eight years.

Jeff, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:19 (seven years ago) link

Gorsuch clerked for Judge David B. Sentelle on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and then for Supreme Court Justices Byron White and Anthony Kennedy

these credentials used to count as centrist – Byron White!

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:26 (seven years ago) link

i'm getting the feeling Schumer will find him sufficiently "mainstream"

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:28 (seven years ago) link

He'll need 8 Dem votes to get his seat, not sure who those would be beyond some of the more obvious suspects

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:19 PM (nine minutes ago)

GOP can nuke the 60-vote requirement any time they want iirc

k3vin k., Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:30 (seven years ago) link

a reminder that the filibuster still exists for SCOTUS nominees

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:30 (seven years ago) link

sucks to be this guy as now the ruthless dem minority will do everything they can to block his nomination even if it is blatantly unconstitutional right

― difficult listening hour, Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:18 PM (eleven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

judging by how the cabinet nominee votes have been going there will be wonderful grandstanding then they'll vote for him

marcos, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:31 (seven years ago) link

GOP controls the senate and the rules. mcdonnell can do with the rule on SCOTUS nominees what reid did a few years ago for most other votes

xp

k3vin k., Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:32 (seven years ago) link

Ugh, makes me sick to my stomach every time this thread is bumped, that this bullshit the GOP pulled worked. I don't think I can read anything about the supreme court in the next four to eight years.

― Jeff, Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:19 PM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yea it so gross. otoh obama did little to push things last year, in retrospect he was pretty weak on this whole thing i thought

marcos, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:32 (seven years ago) link

mcconnell* xp

k3vin k., Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:35 (seven years ago) link

Even accepting the reality that GOP intransigence was world-historic during his terms, Barack Obama never thought that federal judiciary his highest priority. I read two days ago that Reagan nominated 60 percent of these judges, most of whom are still alive and screwing us over.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:35 (seven years ago) link

I honestly don't think McConnell will go the "nuclear option" for SC nominees.

also aren't the rules set at the beginning of each session? It's too late to revise the rules for the current session, no?

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:58 (seven years ago) link

and honestly if a SC nominee battle does actually end in a radical revision of the filibuster rules I will be ambivalent, the abuse of the filibuster is pretty fucked up.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 18:00 (seven years ago) link

The rules are rarely tampered after the session starts, but the Senate can make its own rules however it sees fit, whenever it sees fit, and no one has the standing to stop them.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 18:01 (seven years ago) link

"honestly" is not an adverb I'd use in a sentence with "McConnell" in it

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 18:02 (seven years ago) link

I want to see Presnit Trump go nuclear on McConnell for not destroying the filibuster so he can get his shiny toy now

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 18:13 (seven years ago) link

lol sorry Alfred fair enuff

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 18:17 (seven years ago) link

the biggest argument against McConnell and team killing the filibuster is that it will inevitably come back to bite them when Democrats take the majority

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 18:33 (seven years ago) link

yeah I think McConnell is aware of the precariousness of their majority w Trump as the leader of the party

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 18:37 (seven years ago) link

mm delicious:

Representing Alabama, Mr. Pryor in 2003 filed a supporting brief urging the Supreme Court to uphold a Texas law that made gay sex a crime. The position of the gay men challenging the law, Mr. Pryor wrote, “must logically extend to activities like prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia.”

“The states should not be required to accept, as a matter of constitutional doctrine, that homosexual activity is harmless and does not expose both the individual and the public to deleterious spiritual and physical consequences,” Mr. Pryor wrote in the brief.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 19:50 (seven years ago) link

(his mother was Reagan's EPA administrator)

not just any administrator, of course. Anne Gorsuch Burford's tenure was filled with scandals and she was forced to resign. she was the first agency director in U.S. history to be cited for contempt of Congress.

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 20:56 (seven years ago) link

but you know i bet her son is sooo much better so no big deal

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 20:56 (seven years ago) link

omg I totally remember her from my teenage years under Reagan

fuck this

sleeve, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 20:57 (seven years ago) link

let's hope his scandal comes before he is confirmed

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 20:58 (seven years ago) link

I was trying to remember where I'd heard "Burford." FUCK THIS

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 21:02 (seven years ago) link

executive order 13777: every nomination must come loaded with some ironic detail that renders the choice absurd

Karl Malone, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 21:06 (seven years ago) link

O.G. Gorsuch is infamous to me thanks to the week of Doonesbury strips about the EPA staffer out on the window ledge.

stein beck ii: the wrath of grapes (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 24 January 2017 22:24 (seven years ago) link

Get ready:

The Judicial Crisis Network has said it will spend $10 million boosting Trump’s choice, targeting mostly Senate Democrats up for reelection in 2018 in states that Trump carried. “They’re going to have to choose between the interest of their constituents — who clearly wanted Donald Trump to choose the next Supreme Court justice — and Chuck Schumer’s plan to obstruct this vacancy for the next four years,” said Carrie Severino, the group’s chief counsel.

Many involved in the outside efforts are veterans of court battles dating back to the Bush administration. “You feel like a band, kind of like U2,” said Gary Marx, a Republican strategist involved in mobilizing conservative groups on behalf of the nominee. “You’ve done a number of world tours, a whole lot of albums and looking to release another major one.”

so that makes the Trump Court Songs of Innocence then

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 30 January 2017 13:46 (seven years ago) link

So who's less terrible overall, Hardiman or Gorsuch?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:35 (seven years ago) link

*Hardiman

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:38 (seven years ago) link

Seems like Hardiman, just trying to figure out if there's a catch. But my gut says he picks Gorsuch anyway.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:38 (seven years ago) link

you don't think he'll pick hardiman just because of the name, a la mad dog mattis

marcos, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:44 (seven years ago) link

"He's gonna be great. Look at that name. Hardiman. HARD MAN."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:48 (seven years ago) link

he'll pick whoever's the most sycophantic

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:48 (seven years ago) link

The speculation is that if he picks for a superficial reason, Gorsuch is taller and better looking and a "winner" type.

Aside from that I just don't see how picking a relatively more moderate justice rather than an arch conservative scalia mold justice fits with the way he's done things so far.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:49 (seven years ago) link

is hardiman the one trump's sister was pushing? I secretly hope she knows her brother is a monster and is trying to do us a solid, but I doubt it.

carthago delenda est (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:50 (seven years ago) link

yep

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 18:50 (seven years ago) link

xxp so neither of these dudes are arch conservatives? (or did i misread u)

marcos, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 19:27 (seven years ago) link

Neither is a "bomb thrower." That would be Pryor, so maybe he'll pick Pryor.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 20:31 (seven years ago) link

My lawyer friends think Gorsuch is less terrible, because less of a hack.

Thus, perhaps, less likely to be picked, despite being really conservative. Remember, Scalia, for all his weird jiggery-pokery about the homosexual agenda, was not afraid to restrict the police power when the Constitution required it. That's presumably a negative for the boys in charge.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 20:35 (seven years ago) link

Trump isn't giving these guys an ideological test, Trump has no judicial ideology. He will go for who is the most pliant or, if he can't figure out who that is, he'll go with who his most pliant advisors recommend (in which case maybe his sister will have the most sway). Parsing their past decisions for how Trump will weigh his decision seems like a fool's errand to me.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 20:46 (seven years ago) link

Oregon Senator Jeff Merkeley has just stated he will personally filibuster any Trump nominee, regardless. I will probably be giving him some money very soon, along with my commendation.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Tuesday, 31 January 2017 20:52 (seven years ago) link

he said that two days ago

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 20:52 (seven years ago) link

it seems like the question will be whether or not McConnell needs to invoke the nuclear option to get to 60 votes (which he may not have to if fake Dem assholes like Manchin go along w whoever Trump nominates, as they've indicated they have. although idk i don't think there are actually 8 Dem Senators as worthless as Manchin)

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 31 January 2017 20:54 (seven years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.