Not even with Martin Freeman's hair?
― Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Thursday, 5 January 2017 12:27 (seven years ago) link
eheh. yup ! that said, it feels like he doesn't really care anymore. just phoning it in (especially the Mary's death scene).
― AlXTC from Paris, Thursday, 5 January 2017 12:35 (seven years ago) link
This is like a David Bowie video.
― Mark G, Sunday, 8 January 2017 21:32 (seven years ago) link
it's 2017, it's not hard to understand that overblown emo/nerd shit draws in the viewers
https://twitter.com/search?f=users&vertical=default&q=cumberbatch&src=tyah
― groovypanda, Sunday, 8 January 2017 22:18 (seven years ago) link
Did anyone think this episode (with Toby Jones) an improvement?
I didn't - thought TJ's villain and surrounding plot ridiculous - but many apparently did.
― the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 13:15 (seven years ago) link
It was a lot better than last week's, but the whole thing is just too far off the rails now to be called good. It's not Sherlock Holmes anymore, it's a comic book superhero knockoff. Like a shitty Avengers.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 9 January 2017 14:32 (seven years ago) link
way too much time tied up in character baggage
I got the impression Toby Jones was supposed to be a sort of "what if Jimmy Saville killed adults for fun instead of sexually assaulting children" with the whole keys to the hospital thing
― mh 😏, Monday, 9 January 2017 15:16 (seven years ago) link
Yes -- but he seemed also a deliberate, sometimes heavy-handed comment on Trump, presumably filmed a long time before Trump's election.
The scene early on where he got all his associates to take a memory-loss drug -- I mean, this was ludicrous, and went on and on and on while they sat around waiting for him to do his evil things to them.
Then he spent much of the rest of the episode issuing manic evil laughter.
I thought: someone this obviously horrible couldn't be so successful, but that view doesn't really work as lots of horrible people (Trump, Johnson et al) are indeed successful.
― the pinefox, Monday, 9 January 2017 15:22 (seven years ago) link
This episode was ridiculous and trashy, but it did manage to hit several of the notes that made the first season fun, and therefore was better than the previous episode. Every series runs out of worthwhile at some point. Even Conan Doyle knew he'd run out of ideas and tried like hell to extricate himself from the purgatory of fan service.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 9 January 2017 19:05 (seven years ago) link
agreed with the previous comments.It's MUCH better than the first episode (but it couldn't really be worse !).still, the bad guy and the story were not very well written/obvious (indeed the opening scene where he repeated 10 times they wouldn't remember anything was ludicrous) and the personal/over the top emo stuffs are annoying but the whole thing had more punch and rhythm.and the final twist was unexpected !so overall, not bad. and even funny at moments.
― AlXTC from Paris, Tuesday, 10 January 2017 10:12 (seven years ago) link
Bad Moffat >>>>>>>> Good Gatiss.
Although I usually find the online enmity towards Moffat and his portrayal of women overwrought, Mary's focus on saving the two men in her life was incredibly glaring and uncomfortable.
But otherwise, agreed that this was trashy fun.
― https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmy8x2Lm7rE (Leee), Tuesday, 10 January 2017 16:38 (seven years ago) link
Worst episode ever?
― the pinefox, Sunday, 15 January 2017 22:50 (seven years ago) link
Career suicide bad
― Chuck_Tatum, Monday, 16 January 2017 00:15 (seven years ago) link
Is this like when Alan Alda directed that one episode of M*A*S*H?
― Moog and Stan (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 16 January 2017 00:50 (seven years ago) link
Ooft, that was horrible. Surely that's them done with it now?
― ailsa, Monday, 16 January 2017 00:52 (seven years ago) link
just started
uh is the sister a memetic virus who wrote herself on to Sherlock years ago
― mh 😏, Monday, 16 January 2017 00:55 (seven years ago) link
I think maybe she is an avatar of Star Trek NG's holodeck nemesis The Q.
― Moog and Stan (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 16 January 2017 00:57 (seven years ago) link
well I called that one a few minutes before they did
― mh 😏, Monday, 16 January 2017 00:57 (seven years ago) link
i called it from episode 0
― trilby mouth (darraghmac), Monday, 16 January 2017 01:02 (seven years ago) link
Or maybe this is all really taking place inside the 'mind' of the lunar prison computer MYCROFT from The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress
― Moog and Stan (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 16 January 2017 01:04 (seven years ago) link
darragh would have fared well in my family's "i wrote this" joke where we'd guess where the plot was going on a tv show or movie and then after viewing say "see, i wrote it"
― mh 😏, Monday, 16 January 2017 01:18 (seven years ago) link
high praise
― trilby mouth (darraghmac), Monday, 16 January 2017 01:24 (seven years ago) link
Is somebody going to sing "Dry Bones" at the end of this?
― Moog and Stan (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 16 January 2017 01:38 (seven years ago) link
did they consider writing some episodes in this series where they just solve some cases
― mh 😏, Monday, 16 January 2017 02:14 (seven years ago) link
coming up with extremely clever deductive solutions to rather spectacular, but marginally believable, criminal cases is above the talents of the two writers. now that they've sprinted past the end of the Doyle corpus and must generate their own material, they've decided to take a different direction that better suits their abilities.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 16 January 2017 04:54 (seven years ago) link
that's cool but could they hire someone who can write some mysteries
― mh 😏, Monday, 16 January 2017 05:06 (seven years ago) link
I think I'm going to see that new Underworld movie. I hear the actress who played Irene Adler is in it and this season could have used her presence
― mh 😏, Monday, 16 January 2017 05:08 (seven years ago) link
It was entertaining enough for what it was (AU fan fic) with brain disengaged until the last ten minutes but no show meant to be detail-oriented can afford to be this sloppy with plot holes.
Like 'aha! the recoil would have meant the killer couldn't have been wearing glasses!' but nobody checks the first place you would look for Redbeard for thirty five years.
― Bubba H.O.T.A.P.E (ShariVari), Monday, 16 January 2017 06:31 (seven years ago) link
(AU fan fic)
kill with fire
― trilby mouth (darraghmac), Monday, 16 January 2017 07:39 (seven years ago) link
I think this was really bad, the worst episode I have seen.
I have some kind of attraction to this programme despite all - the high production values, the sense of intelligence even if manifested in meta- / ironic stuff; what may have seemed the subtlety of the relation between C19 original and C21 version; and detection which, like others, I like.
But this one pretty much trampled over all that - I can't think of one thing that was good about it. It became some kind of different programme. Bad way to go out. Christ, even the closing last monologue on Mary's dvd -- how she slowed down so she was reading a trailer voiceover than actually talking to people she knew -- preposterous.
― the pinefox, Monday, 16 January 2017 10:10 (seven years ago) link
wat if maigret but in space
― Houston John (Bananaman Begins), Monday, 16 January 2017 10:46 (seven years ago) link
Good thing there was plenty more screentime for Mycroft, though. He's the best one!
― trishyb, Monday, 16 January 2017 11:04 (seven years ago) link
I get the feeling when the Russians allegedly leaked ep 3 onto the torrents a couple of days ago that there wasn't even a significant demand for it. Also the headline about the BBC enquiry into the leak, lol! Russia be bricking it.
― calzino, Monday, 16 January 2017 11:26 (seven years ago) link
Euros was a cross between Hannibal Lecter, Jigsaw, and a j-horror ghost girl. Ridiculous.
It had actual detection scenes in it so it was better than the Six Thatchers, but not by much.
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Monday, 16 January 2017 18:55 (seven years ago) link
otm http://thequietus.com/articles/21578-bbc-the-final-problem-sherlock-review
― millmeister, Monday, 16 January 2017 19:05 (seven years ago) link
but someone gets a throwaway line about how Thatcher is like Napoleon, which she isn't
Yes, that irritated me from the start.
― Eats like Elvis, shits like De Niro (Tom D.), Monday, 16 January 2017 19:10 (seven years ago) link
tbf, Maggie was the PM during the Falkland Islands War, which was the 45th most important war of the 20th century.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 16 January 2017 19:21 (seven years ago) link
Quietus nailed it, I could barely make it through the last ep. The reference in the article to the taxi driver scene from S1 was a cruel reminder of how good the show used to be. Everyone's contracted for S5, so unfortunately we have further to fall
― Brakhage, Monday, 16 January 2017 20:28 (seven years ago) link
Yeah, the taxi driver scene is a good comparison, because it was a very intense but quite bit of drama, where two people matched their wits, and Sherlock tried to deduce whether the taxi driver could really predict which pill he would choose... But it was still a human scene, you could still put yourself in that situation and see how you could've made the same conclusion as Sherlock. But in this season Sherlock can predict two weeks into the future, the bad guy can predict years into the future, she can be sure that none of the three protagonists die in that grenade explosion (which wasn't even really necessary, cos all she wanted was them to come to Sherrinford), because her mind games wouldn't work if all three weren't there, plus she appears to have telepathic powers comparable to Charles Xavier. It's ridiculous.
So the characters in this series have become wizards, there's nothing human left in them anymore. Moffat and Gatiss seemed to think that the threats the protagonists face have to escalate every seriers, so Holmes and Watson have to fight mass killers in every episode now, not solve any "ordinary" mysteries... Even though the original stories always balanced between more mundane and gruesome crimes, giving them a nice balance. That balance seems to be lost here, it's all on hyperdrive and it's all so dull now.
― Tuomas, Monday, 16 January 2017 20:51 (seven years ago) link
"a very intense but quiet bit of drama"
― Tuomas, Monday, 16 January 2017 20:52 (seven years ago) link
Today, sherlock fans, we have to be soldiers, and that means to hell with what happens to us.
The quietus: To be completely fair, about half of this episode is like a quite good episode of a different show.
Guess I missed that half.
― brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Monday, 16 January 2017 21:16 (seven years ago) link
Well actually I did miss the second half, since the first one was so bad I decided washing up would be a more enjoyable way of spending my time.
― brekekekexit collapse collapse (ledge), Monday, 16 January 2017 21:39 (seven years ago) link
the second half devolved pretty completely into incoherence
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 16 January 2017 21:42 (seven years ago) link
the fact that this stuff is on at a prime slot on a sunday and promoted as well as it was reminds me of how Sapphire and Steel used to be on twice a week on primetime itv.
― koogs, Monday, 16 January 2017 22:53 (seven years ago) link
Remove Bookmark from this Thread
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 03:59 (seven years ago) link
trying to imagine a whole country watching Sapphire and Steel at the same time, it's like an episode of Sapphire and Steel
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 17 January 2017 06:59 (seven years ago) link
(11.8M viewers for S&S apparently. But there were only 3 channels at the time and no remote controls)
― koogs, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 07:13 (seven years ago) link
Everyone's contracted for S5, so unfortunately we have further to fall
Now that Sherlock is "cured" of his misanthropy/sociopathy, there will be all the fun of him falling in love on a regular basis, I expect.
― trishyb, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:02 (seven years ago) link
I think it's kinda sad that this episode was such a misstep, because the was a germ of a good idea there: that Sherlock would finally come across a case he can't solve with his wits, only by using his empathy. I even kinda liked the oh-so-blunt metaphor they used to signal this, when kid Aurus was always asking kid Sherlock, "won't you play with me?", and in the end he was literally playing (the violin) with her, DO YOU SEE? But that human-sized story was buried under all the "clever" audience misdirection, fanwankery, ridiculous plot holes, and the whole stupid attempt to out-Hannibal Hannibal Lecter. It really felt like Moffat & Gatiss forgot like they were writing Sherlock and not Dr. Who (where such stuff is more tolerable since it's science fantasy, not detective fiction).
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:15 (seven years ago) link
I think it's also telling that only one of the main plots this season was actually a mystery brought to Sherlock by a client, and even in that case the client turned out to be fake and tied to a larger non-detective plot. And the characters who were essential when this was still a detective/police procedural (Molly, Gregson, the other cops) have been completely sidelined, while main characters have been reduced to family members and lovers.
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:20 (seven years ago) link