Sea Devils And Die: GeroniMoffat's Doctor Who In The 2010s

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6943 of them)

Also Who is always retconning things, it is part of its DNA, you can just say what we saw in the past now happened differently because Dr 12 inadvertently created a superhuman, so what the doctor experienced no longer matches what the rest of us remember happening. Dr 11 says as much to Amy at one point, maybe in one of the S5 mini episodes? Just as the current version of Earth Who history no longer seems to contain Mondas visiting in 1986.

I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Thursday, 29 December 2016 10:00 (seven years ago) link

I thought about that explanation, but since the Doctor was heavily involved in thwarting those earlier threats to Earth, if the Ghost was doing the same, you'd think they had met in the past? Yet it's heavily implied neither has seen each other since Grant was a kid. Also, wanna bet than when those earlier events are referred to in future episodes, no one will mention that a mysterious superhero was there fighting the Daleks/Cybermen/Sycorax/Sontarans?

Tuomas, Thursday, 29 December 2016 10:13 (seven years ago) link

He is restricted in scope because he's got an alarm that goes off every 15 minutes that reminds him to go wank on one of her dresses.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 29 December 2016 13:01 (seven years ago) link

You should probably not watch Torchwood. xp

nashwan, Thursday, 29 December 2016 13:09 (seven years ago) link

ITT someone gets mad about mutable continuity in a show about mutable continuity

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 29 December 2016 14:56 (seven years ago) link

nu-who spends an inordinate amount of time in america. i understand the commercial reasons, but as a viewer who's not in america it's increasingly jarring.

― Autumn Almanac

as a viewer who is in america i can't understand the reasons. doctor who you suck at america. go back to wales.

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 29 December 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

in my first and only TV voice-over job i had to convince the (British) director that an American would never say, let alone understand, the word "rosette" in the context of receiving a prize. they would say "ribbon". it took an awfully long time to win the argument. less hard-headed ppl than me would have just been like, fuck it

illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 29 December 2016 19:42 (seven years ago) link

<19>"What does "bb" mean?"

― Tuomas,</i>

it's something you masturbate in the same room as

akm, Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

gah fuck those html tags

akm, Thursday, 29 December 2016 21:32 (seven years ago) link

"what's the deal with all this regressive male nanny talk. oh right women are the ones who make babies and that is their defining characteristic per moffat."

I think Moffat thought viewers would react this way to a male nanny and thus spent a lot of time pointing to the situation and going "no, you see, it's TOTALLY ALL RIGHT". Well intentioned but perhaps selling the general public of 2016 a bit short.

Daniel_Rf, Friday, 30 December 2016 11:47 (seven years ago) link

The viewing pubic in the U.K. voted for Brexit and the viewing public in the US elected Trump. If anything, he was giving viewers too much credit.

¶ (DJP), Friday, 30 December 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

i live in progressive minded Berkeley and even here a male nanny is a rare exception; let's not pretend like there is complete gender parity in the nanny profession. pointing out the rarity of it isn't like saying "omg, a FEMALE doctor?"

akm, Friday, 30 December 2016 17:54 (seven years ago) link

Also this is for values of TOTALLY ALL RIGHT which include being a super-creeper.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 30 December 2016 19:21 (seven years ago) link

As someone who's been pretty consistently into the Moffat era of the show, this was really, really bad. Mostly due to every element of the superhero plot, which seems like it could've easily been excised from the episode without really affecting the colonization plot at all.

what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Friday, 30 December 2016 22:19 (seven years ago) link

let's not pretend like there is complete gender parity in the nanny profession. pointing out the rarity of it isn't like saying "omg, a FEMALE doctor?"

― akm, Saturday, 31 December 2016 04:54 (four hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

true, but it's not remarkable enough to point out explicitly. this is a show that (since 2005 especially) has women and men doing all sorts of things that weren't common 50 years ago, and everyone gets on with it and nobody bats an eyelid.

Autumn Almanac, Friday, 30 December 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

As someone who's been pretty consistently into the Moffat era of the show, this was really, really bad. Mostly due to every element of the superhero plot, which seems like it could've easily been excised from the episode without really affecting the colonization plot at all.

Except of course for the final resolution.

¶ (DJP), Saturday, 31 December 2016 02:33 (seven years ago) link

DJP, I doubt there's a considerable overlap between Trump/Brexit voters and people who watch Doctor Who tho.

Daniel_Rf, Saturday, 31 December 2016 13:14 (seven years ago) link

The colonisation plot was pretty rote stuff in its own right, it was mainly there to give some conflict to the superhero plot. The whole thing felt super phoned in.

Matt DC, Saturday, 31 December 2016 13:32 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, it was pretty disappointing, because Dr. Who + superheroes could've provided a fertile mixture, but now both part of the story were stuff we're super predictable, there were none of the sort of cool surprises this sort of genre play could provide in the best case. The superhero identity hijinks were stuff we've seen for decades with Spider-Man/Superman/etc, and the alien invasion plot was recycled from "Aliens of London".

Tuomas, Saturday, 31 December 2016 15:30 (seven years ago) link

When does BBC start the new season? Only seeing it listed as Spring still.
Glad there'll be no Carla. Not sure about presence of Nardole, could become wearing.
Hope Bill will be ok.

Stevolende, Saturday, 31 December 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

I thought I heard the guy say April during the end credits.

Frobisher, Saturday, 31 December 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

yeah april.

there is no character named 'carla'

akm, Saturday, 31 December 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

two weeks pass...

I enjoyed the special while it was on, but it was basically shit. I'd have resolved the romance subplot with her knocking him back for repeatedly neglecting her baby.

Like many people, enjoyed Lucas a lot more than I thought I would.

chap, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:17 (seven years ago) link

Next season trailer was exciting, but it always is.

chap, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 15:18 (seven years ago) link

two months pass...

more info on the new companion

Rachel Luther Queen (DJP), Friday, 31 March 2017 19:03 (seven years ago) link

possible minor spoiler even in the url, but that news is superb

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 31 March 2017 20:38 (seven years ago) link

Yes

I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Saturday, 1 April 2017 00:18 (seven years ago) link

Good second trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbJqNa0_Oz0

I quite want to discuss the final shot, but I know this thread is particilarly spoilerphobic.

chap, Monday, 3 April 2017 15:11 (seven years ago) link

well I am excited *shocker*

Rachel Luther Queen (DJP), Monday, 3 April 2017 15:18 (seven years ago) link

If you're a new-spoiler-hating twitter person, I'd avoid Twitter for the rest of the day...

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 6 April 2017 18:05 (seven years ago) link

yeah that was an unwelcome surprise, thx bbc :(

stanley weebeard (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 6 April 2017 20:02 (seven years ago) link

apparently footage leaked

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:34 (seven years ago) link

It was in a trailer at the screening. Moffat told all present to keep the secret but the guy from the Sun broke the embargo :-((

syzygy stardust (suzy), Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:42 (seven years ago) link

the BBC should know by now that it can't trust anyone

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 6 April 2017 21:48 (seven years ago) link

spoiler is of the "not that shit again" variety.

Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:51 (seven years ago) link

that'll do, guys

(±\ PLO;;;;;;; Style (sic), Thursday, 6 April 2017 22:53 (seven years ago) link

I'm bemused, because I didn't think that was remotely a spoiler?

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 6 April 2017 23:02 (seven years ago) link

Ah okay, I meant the one at the end of the trailer - abanana otmfm

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 6 April 2017 23:11 (seven years ago) link

It's not a piece of news that fills me with great joy.

chap, Friday, 7 April 2017 16:33 (seven years ago) link

that was... fine

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 16 April 2017 00:26 (seven years ago) link

Yeah sad that it's being announced to be his final season. Would like more of him.
Glad to see his hair getting longer and the red frock coat reappearing.
Thought episode pretty good.

Stevolende, Sunday, 16 April 2017 05:12 (seven years ago) link

guys i think bill might be

gay

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 16 April 2017 06:57 (seven years ago) link

There are a number of stories online saying who the next Doctor is. I don't remember hearing anything about a build up or what the possible choices were.
Has that got to do with there being no series last year, so less discussion around?

Stevolende, Sunday, 16 April 2017 10:22 (seven years ago) link

This happens every time though. If you're going by newspapers and celeb mags they deliberately pick someone 'controversial' for the clickbait and trot out the usual cliches about bookmakers suspending bets etc. Has anyone ever met anyone who actually put money on who the next Doctor is btw?

nashwan, Sunday, 16 April 2017 10:48 (seven years ago) link

Thanks for the warning to avoid newspapers today.

Thought that was a great intro episode. As usual, a solid Moffat script turns to nonsense around the 30 minute mark, and some typically naff BBC direction, though it rallies at the end. But Bill's v. good, and the show looks like it's having *fun* for the first time in a while, even if the story was just a mashup of an old RTD "love is the answer" plot with a Moffat "machine part makes regrettable error" story.

Not sure what the deal with the eyestar was - foreshadow of a story to come, or just confusing incidental detail?

Chuck_Tatum, Sunday, 16 April 2017 10:57 (seven years ago) link

plenty of foreshadowing all through this. i hope it's going somewhere because this whole episode was by the numbers imo. even next week's is the template new-companion's-second-episode in a spoilery way that i won't go into.

fucking pop records (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 16 April 2017 11:23 (seven years ago) link

new doctor rumours are deeply troubling :(

years of immersion in the seduction community (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 16 April 2017 11:55 (seven years ago) link

lets not repeat them here then :)

Chuck_Tatum, Sunday, 16 April 2017 12:24 (seven years ago) link

I had heard rumours of Movellans and was thrilled they were back even just for a few seconds. Also glad that their foes are out of the way because the series feels full with the already -announced-by-the-Beeb-but-I'm-not-going-to-spoil x, y, y^2 and z.

Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Sunday, 16 April 2017 12:44 (seven years ago) link

I thought Movellans were viewed as a bit naff from the first time they appeared. Possibly could have been used better , but I'm sure galactic Rick James fans are useful innit?
Are thy just going to cycle through possibly underused alien races throughout this series?

Stevolende, Sunday, 16 April 2017 12:51 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.