Mourning in America - Trump Year One: November '16 to

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7723 of them)

obama benefited from not being hillary clinton, for starters. also uh healthcare xxp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

I don't remember health care being a significant issue in 2008. Clinton had a plan too.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:15 (seven years ago) link

eephus otm

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

no, but it's not because of her slogan, it's because obama is better at this than she is

hence him coming up w a better slogan.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

did you listen to many HRC speeches? i didn't hear all that many, but she openly admitted to being a rather uninspiring pol/speaker.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:18 (seven years ago) link

I don't remember health care being a significant issue in 2008. Clinton had a plan too.

― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:15 PM (four minutes ago)

thought we were talking about the general election

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:20 (seven years ago) link

eephus otm

― Οὖτις, Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:16 PM (three minutes ago)

guy from san francisco agrees that people were super excited about clinton this year, lmao

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:22 (seven years ago) link

sorry

xpost

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:23 (seven years ago) link

I live in Cleveland and knew plenty of people -- mostly women, all ethnicities -- who were insanely excited about voting for Clinton, and openly wept when she lost, so don't make this into some "lol COASTAL ELITES" thing.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

well that just about proves it

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

so we agree, hillary clinton was a good candidate

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

I was referring more to this stuff k3vin

Elections are won by people with vague meaningless slogans and no concrete proposals except for "doesn't it feel good to vote for me" ALL THE TIME.

were people as pumped as they were for obama? no, but it's not because of her slogan, it's because obama is better at this than she is, but obama is better at this than ANYBODY is.

personally most people I knew were pumped for Bernie

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:25 (seven years ago) link

I live in Wisconsin. Surrounded by people who were pumped for Bernie and then subsequently pumped for Hillary. It's not some kind of computer-killing paradox, we're talking about two people who are just not very far from each other in their vision of governance

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

so we agree, hillary clinton was a good candidate

as good as obama? hell no

as good as bernie sanders or joe biden or martin o'malley would have been? yes

as good as john kerry? substantially better

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:29 (seven years ago) link

hence him coming up w a better slogan

why do you think obama "came up with" that slogan? i would be shocked if it weren't generated by the same dem party pros who came up with "i'm with her" and "stronger together." that's their job. "yes we can" is borrowed from chavez of course and axelrod says obama didn't even like it

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/11414185/Barack-Obama-thought-Yes-We-Can-slogan-was-too-corny.html

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:32 (seven years ago) link

Lake Erie coastal elites

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:34 (seven years ago) link

as good as bernie sanders or joe biden or martin o'malley would have been? yes

could we stop this, bcz it seems we simply have different definitions/views of reality

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

Just heard someone posit that perhaps Trump doesn't even know what the department of energy does - nuclear arsenal and all that - and that is why he picked Rick Perry, thinking it was about drilling and oil and stuff like that.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:40 (seven years ago) link

it wouldn't surprise me

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

as good as bernie sanders or joe biden or martin o'malley would have been? yes

yes, very likely that bernie would have also lost michigan, wisconsin, and pennsylvania

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

entirely possible

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

hypotheticals can't be proven

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link

#stillwithher

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link

as I've said many times on this very thread already, post-mortems and straw-grasping are of next to no interest to me, would prefer we were talking about Trump's presidency

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link

Bernie won WI 56 to 43 BTW

a (waterface), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link

xp: why do that when we could spend time talking shit about Clinton

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

god you guys are fucking tiresome. primary /= general election, Bernie was never really attacked w negative ads/Trump tweets/GOP noise machine yadda yadda yadda why are we having this argument you already know are the counter-arguments

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

all the counter-arguments

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link

one definitive way that we can fight against the things we dislike about Trump's administration is to spend as much time as we possibly can bitching about how Hillary Clinton was a terrible candidate and human being

¶ (DJP), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link

well that just about proves it

― k3vin k., Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:25 PM (twenty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Don't be a fucking weasel.

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:54 (seven years ago) link

The election's over. I thought we all knew.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

(don't want to seem above it tho, bernie woulda won)

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link

getting back on topic: steve bannon should be skinned alive

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

instead increase allocation of resource X to sector Y by 15%, assuming that it is correct that sector Y's historical trend of voting on issue Z continues to increase by 5% per annum, an assumption based upon a number of factors

This reminds me of the one professor who got plenty of the press this for "predicting every Presidential outcome since 1984! (...except 2000)"

Which had some sorta weird calculus like Marx trying to throw out how to figure the value of a thing thru algebra or something; This weird mechanicism historicism that doesn't nec. take into effect the multi-variable random dumbness of all human affairs at all levels.

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

It's not some kind of computer-killing paradox, we're talking about two people who are just not very far from each other in their vision of governance

That is pretty clearly nonsense.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link

iirc, bernie just wanted to do it all but hillary understood that change is incremental

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

next four years are gonna be a hell of an increment

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link

crut otm

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link

Increment weather a-comin'

THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

Pretty sure Hillary herself would admit she played this wrong.

Treeship, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

http://www.thewrap.com/insiders-trump-team-dangles-ambassadorships-to-lure-a-list-inauguration-singers-exclusive/

President-elect Donald Trump’s team is struggling so hard to book A-list performers for his inaugural festivities that it offered ambassadorships to at least two talent bookers if they could deliver marquee names, the bookers told TheWrap.

, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:45 (seven years ago) link

Why doesn't he invite the Sage of Atlanta?

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:47 (seven years ago) link

if it's kanye i quit

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:48 (seven years ago) link

honestly hope kanye performs

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

it is going to be kanye

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

then they'll bring Kim out and Trump will grab her by the pussy

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:49 (seven years ago) link

remember when Beyoncé played George W. Bush's inauguration?

simply gabbing a wonderful christmastime (crüt), Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:50 (seven years ago) link

yes

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 14 December 2016 23:51 (seven years ago) link

they can't get ted nugent and kid rock and prob a bunch of country singers??

marcos, Thursday, 15 December 2016 00:02 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.