Mourning in America - Trump Year One: November '16 to

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7723 of them)

NRO has been dispirited if not deflated lately, a consequence of picking a losing horse.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:57 (seven years ago) link

Mordy otm

idk if this is better suited for the anti-semitism thread or not but I'm just gonna put this here. My wife has been terrified over the last week that no one in the press is calling Bannon a Nazi, about the "heil trump" video, the "Are Jews People?" CNN tagline, about the swastikas popping up etc. But my response has m/l been that Trump didn't create these people, they were *already* here and they have been for a long time, there aren't actually that many of them, there's no state apparatus in place to perform any ethnic cleansing of Jews or anyone else, our country has a rich and deep history of white supremacists and anti-semites (some of whom even occupied the presidency! Imagine!) - and that while these people are both scary and idiotic, it's important to maintain some perspective and respond with cold, clear-eyed pragmatism rather than hysteria. None of this talk about fleeing the country or whatever (lol, where would we go - Israel? No thx) I think it's clear that the real threat isn't from a Nazi state, it's from much more common and mundane sources that are ever-present in our society - lone nuts w/guns and overzealous law enforcement. Racists and anti-semites are currently emboldened and the media is hyping them up because they are sensationalistic and they fit into the current narrative about Trump's rise. These people should be resisted, called out, humiliated, ostracized from public discourse, and legally prosecuted where necessary. But this is not Berlin in the 30s. Nazis, the Klan, racist cops - these people have always been here, and they will always need to be fought against, it's the American way.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

The alt-right is definitely not the nazi party in 1933, and if it's the Nazi party in 1922, Spencer is no Hitler. When it comes to Bannon, I'm less certain what's going on -- I'm not convinced he's literally of them, but he's certainly nihilistic enough to be willing to court them, and certainly fueled by resentment. Maybe he thinks it's all just part of his psy-op circus, but not about to let my guard down.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:04 (seven years ago) link

Bannon seems more like an opportunist to me. Doesn't make it any better but yeah I don't get TRUE BELIEVER vibes from him.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

Nazis don't use the term Judeo-Christian ime

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:06 (seven years ago) link

thanks for that post Outic, I needed an alternate perspective here

sleeve, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:15 (seven years ago) link

you bet!
https://youtu.be/CcPqFqqqGj0

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:26 (seven years ago) link

moreover, with the caveat that richard spencer seems like a real unredeemable piece of shit, from the clip it doesn't even appear like his "are they even people" comment was about Jews but about the media. the "soulless golem" reference could certainly be a nod towards Jews but CNN is engaging in some pretty flagrant sensationalism. like i've seen ppl say that CNN was irresponsible to run that chyron without noting that they were just summing up Spencer's comments (and made it appear that they themselves were debating the humanness of Jews), but the very summation itself appears to be a fabrication designed to freak people out. i don't doubt that spencer would call Jews all kinds of things but why make up what he didn't say to scare ppl who are already afraid? it seems extremely irresponsible to me.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

NRO missing the fact that several of the nazi convention dudes actually run a nazi pony panel at BronyCon

mh 😏, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:34 (seven years ago) link

fwiw I've been thinking a lot about the Bannon "darkness is good" quote:

“Darkness is good,” he said. “Dick Cheney. Darth Vader. Satan. That’s power. It only helps us when they get it wrong. When they’re blind to who we are and what we’re doing.”

Remarkably, this quote is getting used exactly the way he's admitting he wants it to be used -- people are sharing it as proof he's evil. Which he may in fact be, but it's just interesting that if you read it carefully he's really saying that he likes people to get hysterical about him so they can't see straight. And people are getting hysterical about him.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:35 (seven years ago) link

"If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him."

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

https://twitter.com/dansolomon/status/801119923577569280

Interesting - looks like Outgamie county had 1126 more votes counted than ballots cast, and all 1126 were for Trump. Guess the GOP had a GOTV effort after all!

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:49 (seven years ago) link

i saw something about this last night. feel a bit stupid getting conspiratorial but ...hm

akm, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:53 (seven years ago) link

I also feel v wary about getting sucked into conspiracy theories especially when they tell me what I want to hear but I've been thinking since the election that Trump projected every one of his vices onto Clinton and spent a last months of the election saying the vote would be rigged.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:56 (seven years ago) link

exactly, he's telegraphed all this so blatantly that, geez, I dunno. I can see us looking back like, "I can't believe all you idiots actually thought 61 million people voted for Donald 'Grab her by the pussy' Trump"

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 21:58 (seven years ago) link

whoa @ that Twitter thread

so HRC needs to ask for a recount? good luck with that.

sleeve, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:00 (seven years ago) link

I'm very skeptical about all of this. If there were a conspiracy to inflate Trump votes spanning multiple states, then it should definitely be investigated and prosecuted, but I don't think that Clinton requesting a recount spanning those states because of messed up results in one county is really the most constructive thing to do at this point.

I'm getting pretty tired of all these people holding out hope that electors will switch their votes or other crazy things will happen to magically change the result of the election. What in the world good would that do other than further undermining what little democracy still remains here? It's time to accept that Trump won and determine how to stop his agenda rather than hoping for a bizarre miracle.

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:07 (seven years ago) link

Nazis don't use the term Judeo-Christian ime

― Mordy, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:06 PM (fifty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

well, neither do Jews, but neither here nor there

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:08 (seven years ago) link

no one has accused bannon of being jewish tho!

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

maybe we should just to confuse matters!

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:09 (seven years ago) link

sorry I just loathe "Judeo-Christian" as an idea, I decline to be co-opted by Christian hegemony especially in service of islamophobia

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

I realize that's not your point I am just prickly about it

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

lol Shep going ham

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/shepard-smith-trump-news-you-can-choose

cucky ramen-o (will), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:10 (seven years ago) link

I'm with ya Moodles, just irritated that Trump spent an entire month whining about how the vote was rigged, only to find out that virtually every instance of rigging or suppression happened in his favor, not to mention the electoral college giving him the victory despite losing by a projected 2.5 million

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

http://www.snopes.com/audit-the-vote/

human and working on getting beer (longneck), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:24 (seven years ago) link

for the record this "It's not a conflict of interest if I do it" bullshit is so damn infuriating. If Clinton said that they'd already be starting the impeachment proceedings.

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:27 (seven years ago) link

i feel like what could actually get the vote overturned is if there were pretty clear and convincing evidence that russian hackery or something did inflate trump vote count

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

but anything less than that is just not going to fly

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:35 (seven years ago) link

i'm sure the director of the NSA is doing everything he can to validate the results

http://www.wsj.com/articles/adm-michael-rogers-leading-candidate-to-be-trumps-director-of-national-intelligence-1479495306

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

is it weird or wrong that i can't completely dismiss the idea that that might have happened? (russian hackery) i mean it seems super-unlikely, but i feel like i'm living in a basically insane universe now

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:36 (seven years ago) link

for the record this "It's not a conflict of interest if I do it" bullshit is so damn infuriating. If Clinton said that they'd already be starting the impeachment proceedings.

― frogbs, Tuesday, November 22, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz49AVqsFnE

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:39 (seven years ago) link

I was thinking last week about Trump's continual reiteration about the election being rigged possibly being an admission. Always best to hide in plain sight or redirect attention or whatever.

Stevolende, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

is it weird or wrong that i can't completely dismiss the idea that that might have happened? (russian hackery) i mean it seems super-unlikely, but i feel like i'm living in a basically insane universe now

lol ditto, I remember thinking Tuesday night "I'm going to wake up and there's going to be a massive story about how the voting machines were all compromised, because there's no way in hell this many people actually voted for Donald Trump"

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:41 (seven years ago) link

it's not crazy - just a month ago, a bunch of toasters connected to wi-fi took down the internet

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

If the Russians were capable of tweaking the actual votes, would they have done all the other stuff (hacking DNC emails, etc)? I mean, would people even be talking about the Russians now if that stuff had never happened?

otoh, maybe they did do that stuff to produce arguments just like mine here. It's all about . . . levels.

nickn, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

Maybe they did all the other stuff to make the election close enough to steal.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

Maybe they were only capable of hacking a few select locations without detecting suspicion and they knew that that alone wouldn't be enough to tip it. The system is totally decentralized.

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

Or mordy otm - didnt see your post

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

i still think non-hackery explanations are more plausible though - gains for trump over romney were present in p much all the states, not just in the swing states. i think trump is going to end up with 1-2 million more votes than romney had in 2012.

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:31 (seven years ago) link

i want to rule it out because i hate conspiracy theories but somehow it seems possible to me

Treeship, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:32 (seven years ago) link

whatever happened to oppo dump

akm, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

xpost

that, and actually makes me start wondering about brexit

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

Not convinced by any conspiracy talk so far, but it did occur to me in the last few days before the election that if there were indeed plans to somehow rig the election, Trump's repeatedly hinting that he might dispute the results thus forcing Democrats to strongly defend the democratic process and the legitimacy of the results would have been a pretty smart move.

.robin., Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:36 (seven years ago) link

never attribute to malice what can be explained by systemic racism and the electoral college

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:41 (seven years ago) link

my faith is democracy is already pretty rocked by the loser of this election getting 2.5 million more votes than the winner

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/activists-urge-hillary-clinton-to-challenge-election-results.html

Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.

Last Thursday, the activists held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias to make their case, according to a source briefed on the call. The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it’s important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

i'm not an expert in the field but apparently halderman is a serious person whose opinion should have weight

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:57 (seven years ago) link

each election should be independently verified imo.

Van Horn Street, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

i'm pretty sure any attempt to audit the vote would be a total shitshow - immediately politicized, trump voters claiming "they're trying to steal the election" -- there's already such a void of legitimacy in the govt (for v good reasons) that it would be impossible to reach a conclusion that would not leave a substantial portion of the country feeling cheated

Mordy, Wednesday, 23 November 2016 00:04 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.