Mourning in America - Trump Year One: November '16 to

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7723 of them)

Like I don't think a lot of people not in Trump's base are going to be scrolling through "Why Women Are Happier in the Kitchen" articles by Milo just so they can get exciting white house coverage.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:10 (seven years ago) link

That's nuts, I can totally see it! One, all Trump has to do is give exclusive interviews/access to Breitbart. And two, clearly no one cares about the misogyny, racism, etc, or Trump wouldn't be president.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:11 (seven years ago) link

Trump has to do is give exclusive interviews/access to Breitbar

that's what i was thinking

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:12 (seven years ago) link

Let's not get carried away. Even RT tries to present itself as a legit news source, and sometimes presents accurate coverage of things that don't negatively impact Putin. Right now it's a much more sophisticated operation than Breitbart imo. Breitbart would really have to massively change for that to work. Not saying it can't happen, just not in its current form.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:13 (seven years ago) link

BTW, guess who doesn't have a problem calling the "alt-right" neo-nazis, unlike the craven American press:
https://www.rt.com/viral/367766-cnn-jews-people-reaction/

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

It's alarming to me how much I've let myself forget about the W presidency, which spakred near-daily frustration and rage and anxiety at various levels for basically the entire eight years. At first, regarding the press, all I could remember was the disgusting embedded-journalist scam for good coverage (basically an extension of the carefully-managed press pools of Gulf War I) and Bush and Cheney being caught on a hot mic calling Adam Clymer a ''major league asshole from the New York Times'' or whatever it was.

Still I think what Trump is doing is much more broadly corrosive to democracy and civic discourse. It's not *new* - as others have pointed out, it just extends the dismissal of fact-based reporting that we've long become accustomed to from the right-wing media sphere - but coming from the soon-to-be President.... like, there are huge swaths of this country that have spent years handwaving away any contrary evidence with ''oh well, the New York TIMES, that's just a liberal tabloid'' and now that's to be even more permanently cemented.... ughghghghghghhghgg. I mean there is so much to be anxious and enraged about with where things are headed, but this is the one tensing my shoulders and stomach today. Fuck, four years of this!

dustalo springsteen (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:17 (seven years ago) link

yea it is bad

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:18 (seven years ago) link

Correction, EIGHT years. Didn't you see Trumps's tweet?

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte has had a strained relationship with the U.S. since taking office in June, mainly because of U.S. criticism of his controversial — and often brutal — war on drugs. But he says he's hoping to get along with President-elect Trump.

Toward that end, he's appointed real estate magnate Jose E.B. Antonio as a special trade envoy to the U.S. — and he just so happens to be the man building Trump Tower Manila.

http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2016/11/22/502895797/whos-the-new-philippine-envoy-the-man-building-trump-tower-manila

and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:20 (seven years ago) link

I think nearly the entire media being owned by 3 conglomerates is a genuine threat to the 1st Amendment

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:24 (seven years ago) link

and he just so happens to be the man building Trump Tower Manila.

the stark, horrific reality of a trump presidency is going to far outstrip the creative efforts of all the people who've imagined 'lol president trump' scenarios over the years, isn't it

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:28 (seven years ago) link

too bad the Dems ran some awful Senate candidates (eg Evan Bayh) so can't impeach, right?

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:33 (seven years ago) link

xxpost These are by no means mutually exclusive threats.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

Worst, when we emerge from this daily disaster, the tendrils of Trump will be everywhere, from the top down, from the government to private sector, from media to the courts. He and his family will be richer, more powerful, more pervasive, and installed in the fucking Hall of Presidents at Disneyworld.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:35 (seven years ago) link

the stark, horrific reality of a trump presidency is going to far outstrip the creative efforts of all the people who've imagined 'lol president trump' scenarios over the years, isn't it

― trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:28 AM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

On the plus side, the man's ego has ensured that every one of his properties is clearly labeled when shit gets real and people are weighing their property damage options.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:39 (seven years ago) link

The attraction will close on January 17, 2017 for refurbishment and the addition of Donald Trump as a new audio-animatronic figure. It will reopen on June 30, 2017.

Yeah, he'll probably make that. In order for him to leave office early he'd need:

  • Something that offends the Democrats enough to start impeachment proceedings.
  • Something that offends enough Republicans enough to join impeachment proceedings.
  • Something where it would be of more benefit to the Republican party to have President Mike Pence.
  • Something that drops his popularity with his base enough that neither side is worried about re-election.
You can read 'offends' as 'imperils re-election' as you wish.

I can't see him not hitting that combo some time in the first four years.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:51 (seven years ago) link

Democrats can't start impeachment proceedings unless they control the House

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

I think reelection is the only reason most Republicans would think twice about preferring a President Pence.

With great reservation, I'd prefer a President Pence too -- less of a wild card and easier to defeat in 2020.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:53 (seven years ago) link

But I guess this is all going to depend on how Trump plays ball with the GOP.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

yea it would have to be something truly toxic for it to be mutually beneficial to have impeachment proceedings xps

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:54 (seven years ago) link

Pence is a known quantity within the standard GOP party structure, in that sense he represents a preferable opponent

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/C09oz2A.png

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

breitbart not going easy on thier guy!

, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:55 (seven years ago) link

no one knows what can happen next year, let alone 2020.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

Pence is a known quantity within the standard GOP party structure, in that sense he represents a preferable opponent

― Οὖτις, Tuesday, November 22, 2016 10:55 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Pence would probably have zero appeal outside the predictable GOP base, which IMO means he probably loses. Trump is a walking question mark. So I don't know who the GOP prefers but I know who I'd rather face. Ever actually listen to Pence speak? He has this timeless creepiness in affect and diction, like it could just as easily be the 1950s.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:00 (seven years ago) link

i think pence is pretty dangerous actually, that VP debate when he lied about basically everything w/ smooth confidence is cheney-esque

I've read Ta-nehisi Coates. (marcos), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:02 (seven years ago) link

Democrats can't start impeachment proceedings unless they control the House

Anyone can start impeachment proceedings - they have to clear the House, but it's a safe bet that they'll get a majority of Democrats, no?

I think reelection is the only reason most Republicans would think twice about preferring a President Pence.

This is probably true - but they don't need most Republicans.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:04 (seven years ago) link

Bah, misread that last one, sorry man alive.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:05 (seven years ago) link

Yeah he is dangerous, but I also don't see him having the appeal of a Trump. Neither are great, just saying I think Pence is easier to beat in an election because his record is clear, it matches the way he looks and speaks, and he's not the kind of galvanizer Trump is. You're not going to see 30K people showing up for Pence rallies.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:06 (seven years ago) link

otm

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:07 (seven years ago) link

I guess his biggest threat is big turnout among the evangelical base. He was probably a smart pick for the Trump ticket in that regard. He'd be very strong with the old republican coalition but no crossover appeal imo. My guess is that's not enough to win presidential elections anymore, granted I don't want to sound too sure of anything right now. He's certainly slick and polished and intelligent and has some amount of charisma, I just think there are a lot of Trump voters who wouldn't go for him.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link

But I guess this is all going to depend on how Trump plays ball with the GOP.

― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:54 AM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

He's going to start behaving presidentially any day now, I just know it.

In an election season chock full of things that defy belief, I think the most shocking thing to me is that people still harbor any illusions that Trump is anything other than the narcissistic black hole that he's nakedly presented himself as for years.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:14 (seven years ago) link

Someone posted a short video he made about his transition effort, very bland and underwhelming. He talked a little about his first 100 days and the blustery stuff about muslims and building a wall wasn't in there, the nonsensical line about "deleting two regulations for every new one" was in there. Wasn't sure if it spoke to a moderation in policy direction or just an attempt to quiet things down or what.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:18 (seven years ago) link

could just be that he hasn't got a fucking clue what he's going to do

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

He's definitely a narcissistic black hole but he still has to operate within the existing structures, so long as they still exist.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

according to David Remnick Trump's telling journalists that he "loves" Obama now

duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

black holes tend to be pretty destructive iirc

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

and he's had two (TWO!) whole phone calls with obama in the last fortnight! an amazing relationship, just terrific xp

trump le monde (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

the nonsensical line about "deleting two regulations for every new one" was in there

I keep coming back to this because it is so hilariously nonsensical - it's not what's *in* the regulation that's important to him, it's how many there are! Should just write one giant sweeping regulation for everything and tell him that that all the other regulations have been eliminated. Magic!

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

Yeah they're going to start naming all brand new regulations "3b" "35f" etc. as a loophole

Evan, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:28 (seven years ago) link

On day one, every government employee named Walter will be shown the door. Walter is a terrible name, so so bad.

i need microsoft installed on my desktop, can you help (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:29 (seven years ago) link

Like I read regulations all the time in my job and I don't even know what he really means by "a regulation." An entire section of federal code? A subsection?

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

Donald Trump is not a person to whom words mean things

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

he doesn't mean anything he doesn't understand anything

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:33 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

regulators mount up

(•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

yeah it's about as vague and meaningful as his "5 year lobbying ban...unless they sign a piece of paper" plan

frogbs, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

odds on trump quickly getting fed up with all the hassle of being president and just abdicating?

conrad, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

I don't think he'd resign, just stop coming to the office

slathered in cream and covered with stickers (silby), Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:38 (seven years ago) link

our greatest hope

Mordy, Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:40 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.