i mean, "america is already great" wasn't so inspiring to people. the democrats at least need to make a claim to improve the conditions of the people who want to vote for them. this wasn't as much of an issue when their opponents were conservatives who just wanted to shrink the government and could maybe promise a tax cut, but up against fascists promising the moon u get the picture
― Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link
obviously no left deserving of the name is anything less than militantly antiracist
I don't think this is obvious, given that ppl seem to want to recreate The Jungle
― ¶ (DJP), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link
flopson: eventually, yes, a coalition of mostly capitalist countries defeated the fascists in the most destructive war in history, nationalizing industry in the process and w a lil help from 25 million dead communists. was hoping we could nip it in something closer to the bud this time tho
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link
djp if it's not obvious by all means let's work to make it obviouser
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link
only socialism kills fascism; anyone who says otherwise is selling something
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, November 20, 2016 2:38 PM (five minutes ago)
i think bombs and guns and war crimes tribunals have done so in the past.
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link
but the conflation of working-class politics w white supremacy (and the working class w the "white working class") and committed trump voters with the millions upon millions of stayhomes is an error xxps
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link
dmac, what are the immigration laws of ireland like
no blacks, dogs or irish
― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:47 (seven years ago) link
lol ok so you guys are strapping in for ww3 then? xxp
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link
who's on our side again?
Trump, in all his ignorant bullshit, did v v well to make the single dominating headlines this weekend abt Hamilton instead of his multi-million settlement.
Good luck USA, good luck with your new president. For you are truly, truly screwed. And the rest of "the west" will be dragged along in this magnificent downfall. Thanks, thanks again. You fucking imbeciles.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, November 20, 2016 2:47 PM (twenty-six seconds ago)
this is otm
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, November 20, 2016 2:48 PM (thirty-seven seconds ago)
uh, we were pointing out basic historical facts that disprove your "challenging opinion" -- I agree with the rest of your post, but the only socialism bit was absurd.
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:49 (seven years ago) link
― 龜, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:43 (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
"nothin we havent done ourselves please lads"
― the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:50 (seven years ago) link
We need militant antiracism! But just not in the theater, because that is impolite, and really, think of the optics.
― Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:51 (seven years ago) link
Socialism is not gonna beat fascism IMO (the only people I see saying so are, uh, socialists) and our best bet is to step back from the ledge and revert course to the previous status quo
― flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:52 (seven years ago) link
Only white guy farmers and plumbers should speak for the left from now on. Great optics on those dudes - the best
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link
are you defending neoliberalism or ...?
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:53 (seven years ago) link
Socialism beat fascism before and it can do it again
And before you say it'll never happen in this country, look at who's president
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:55 (seven years ago) link
Also, our antiracism must never be seen as 'smug' or 'arrogant' and it must never be seen as inconvenient to white people, because they might find that abrasive. And while militant, it should of course always be tolerant of racism, because otherwise it's hypocritical. And also, it should never be overplayed because economics is the way to go.
― Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link
fred i'm not sure whom yr arguing with but if it's me it needs some work
― difficult listening hour, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:57 (seven years ago) link
i think he's arguing with flappy bird
― Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link
fred u cant even get the ppl who agree with u to agree with u maybe youre not the guy to come up the strategies for the nonvoters
― the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link
I don't know what anyone's arguing anymore. But could we stop seriously using the term "optics" because it is redolent of smug tv commentators that should be reassigned to valuable occupations like managing wastewater treatment plants.
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 22:59 (seven years ago) link
also stop using "our" and "we" ya damned dane, you can't vote here
― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link
this is a dumb conversation
― Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:01 (seven years ago) link
^^ new board description
― who is extremely unqualified to review this pop album (BradNelson), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link
treeship otm
― k3vin k., Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link
anyway my wife and I just booked spots on one of the Cleveland buses for the Million Women March on Jan. 21 so if anyone else is going we will see you there
― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link
― sarahell, Sunday, November 20, 2016 5:53 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
u asking me? I was just saying I don't think we should interpret Trump win as a fundamental break with the past, where the only choice is now to chart a course to Socialism or stay in fascism. the easiest choice is still to elect a centre-left liberal Democrat in four years (maybe someone more Bernie than Hillary, whatever). we don't need to have a socialist revolution just cuz we elected a moron who is courted by the alt-right
― flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:04 (seven years ago) link
I have tentative plans to go to DC for whatever protests end up happening
I think they will be big, yuuge even
― iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link
i'm probably going to be there too
― Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link
yes flopson, i was asking you, and thanks for clarifying and not responding in the form of a ridic challop
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link
flopson asks a good question, which is what do we mean by "socialism"? what would a revolutionary program look like in an era where the bargaining power of labor has been totally liquidated?
― Treeship, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link
and on another subject:https://www.fastcompany.com/3065777/inside-gab-the-new-twitter-alternative-championed-by-the-alt-right
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link
It's entirely possible that many political philosophies can defeat fascism, and probably a combination of them will be required - OF COURSE - but what I took from dlh's post, or what i wanted to take, was that only stiff opposition will work. we can't JD Vance it.
xpost maybe the first thing to recognize is that the bargaining power of labour has NOT been totally liquidated. the US has legal structures that ensure freedoms to organize and to strike that 100 years ago were pipe dreams
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:15 (seven years ago) link
too bad all those union dudes love trump
― iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link
labor in the USA is going to be reduced to smithereens by the time four years is up
― flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link
they won't love trump when he ends up not delivering.
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:20 (seven years ago) link
I do think we should be as obstructionist to Trump as Republicans were to Obama (if not more), but we all know that's not going to happen.
― flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:21 (seven years ago) link
Good article
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/to-resist-a-trump-presidency-ask-what-would-the-abolitionists-do/2016/11/18/2615a136-a767-11e6-8fc0-7be8f848c492_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-e%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.62f01cbbb0af
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link
https://d17oy1vhnax1f7.cloudfront.net/items/0R3j0b2Z1J2S101T3h0Y/Superman%20is%20not%20a%20dick.jpg
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link
flopson, i'm confused, I thought you were Canadian.
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:29 (seven years ago) link
lol ya I am Canadian, sry I keep using "we" to mean 'the US left'
― flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:33 (seven years ago) link
ie canada
― the kids are alt right (darraghmac), Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:34 (seven years ago) link
it's just "weird" idk that today's discussion has been 1/2 foreigners and ex-pats.
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:37 (seven years ago) link
Anglophones in Quebec have a particularly strong identification with Americans, imo (we don't feel Québecois, but also buy enough into the idea that Québec isn't part of Canada to not feel Canadian). my francophone girlfriend has no idea why I'm so torn up about the election of Donald Trump lol
― flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:38 (seven years ago) link
also US Politics is just a topic of universal interest and no one needs a justification to care about it (imo)
― flopson, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link
Hamilton is global!
― Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:39 (seven years ago) link
us politics is not just a topic of universal interest, it's also a topic of universal relevance
the rest of the world should get some token rest of the world state to vote in
― iatee, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:40 (seven years ago) link
And also, the discussion between an 'identitarian' approach and a strictly economist approach to the ascendant populist right is important all over the world. In Denmark the Danish Peoples Party became the main support for the right-wing government back in 2001. We've had the same discussion you're having now for fifteen years at this point.
― Frederik B, Sunday, 20 November 2016 23:42 (seven years ago) link