pitchfork is dumb (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (22860 of them)

banging hip hop beats

but... so many banging hip hop beats are/were sampled from jazz records

Οὖτις, Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:14 (seven years ago) link

those rhythms have been key elements of jazz since the late 60s, when swing rhythms stopped being so omnipresent

Οὖτις, Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

kinda feel like we should have a dedicated spiritual hat jazz thread tbh

Οὖτις, Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

right but i think it's changed even in the last 10-15 years. like when i was trying to play jazz in college it felt like we were getting away with something by playing beats, or it was ok to do that once or twice a set to change up the feel, like the obligatory latin jazz tune. and now you're just as likely to see shows where the ratio has flipped, or that's how it seems to me anyway.

sam jax sax jam (Jordan), Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:24 (seven years ago) link

A lot of funk samples too :P

As open a genre as jazz is, I think it might have room for some works being categorized both funk/soul AND jazz

niels, Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:26 (seven years ago) link

interesting observation, I've thought more than once in that same period that the standard jazz swing beat is just a thing that's almost completely vanished from modern musical vocabulary. It was everywhere for decades, and now it's just kinda gone.

xp

Οὖτις, Thursday, 22 September 2016 18:28 (seven years ago) link

the soloing on the kamasi record... it's completely jazz style soloing, melodically, rhythmically...

brimstead, Thursday, 22 September 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

i agree! live it was notably different.

thrusted pelvis-first back (ulysses), Thursday, 22 September 2016 19:18 (seven years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/F4zokUf.jpg

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 22 September 2016 19:40 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwFNMkrJqFs

thrusted pelvis-first back (ulysses), Thursday, 22 September 2016 19:50 (seven years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJFoWYA0rBA

scott seward, Thursday, 22 September 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

wikki wikki.........

scott seward, Thursday, 22 September 2016 20:12 (seven years ago) link

Kamasi is in the latest Marc Maron podcast, which is a, ah, thing (Ben Ratliff also puts in an appearance).

Sunn O))) Brother Where Art Thou? (Chinaski), Thursday, 22 September 2016 20:41 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I listened to it today. I'm not the biggest Maron fan, but it was an interesting conversation. (A lot more interesting than the Ratliff segment.)

Don Van Gorp, midwest regional VP, marketing (誤訳侮辱), Thursday, 22 September 2016 20:45 (seven years ago) link

I've got it lined up for a bedtime listen. Intrigued.

Sunn O))) Brother Where Art Thou? (Chinaski), Thursday, 22 September 2016 20:46 (seven years ago) link

lmao @ that Jizz Addicts shirt

alpine static, Thursday, 22 September 2016 23:24 (seven years ago) link

Forks the Kamasi Washington jazz truther...why won't Kamasi Washington show us his jazz certificate? The people deserve to know!

Pull your head on out your hippy haze (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 23 September 2016 00:30 (seven years ago) link

idk who Pfork's target audience is anymore but it sure isn't me, I check it once or twice a week now

Οὖτις, Friday, 23 September 2016 22:37 (seven years ago) link

omg i have this video idea that is, like, totally random

I look forward to hearing from you shortly, (Karl Malone), Friday, 23 September 2016 22:43 (seven years ago) link

I smell a Pulitzer

Wimmels, Friday, 23 September 2016 23:07 (seven years ago) link

idk who Pfork's target audience is anymore but it sure isn't me, I check it once or twice a week now

― Οὖτις, Friday, September 23, 2016 11:37 PM (three days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

probably once every two weeks for me which is a big shift. redesign did it for me tho.

in twelve parts (lamonti), Monday, 26 September 2016 17:20 (seven years ago) link

LOL--this is news?

http://pitchfork.com/news/68561-rick-rubin-attends-first-presidential-debate/

a (waterface), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 13:20 (seven years ago) link

Ever since the redesign (could be coincidence) they've been posting these weird stories occasionally that only exist because they involve, in whatever abstract way, someone with a connection to the music business but don't have much else to do with the actual music or the business.

Evan, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 13:30 (seven years ago) link

They were dying for a way to put "Presidential Debate" into a headline in this case obviously

Evan, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 13:35 (seven years ago) link

Good to see them covering every streaming platform that Blonde is available on.

MarkoP, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

Especially considering his newfound penchant for breezy, non-confrontational pop music, in 2016, it’s hard to imagine Banhart being at the forefront of anything

bon iver to thread

Wimmels, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

the way they phrased it made me think it was about rick rubin attending his first presidential debate and i was like, well congrats look who's a big boy

nomar, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 18:15 (seven years ago) link

it is about rick rubin attending his first presidential debate

a (waterface), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 18:20 (seven years ago) link

wow that's so cool he must have been so excited

nomar, Tuesday, 27 September 2016 18:37 (seven years ago) link

he's a big boy

a (waterface), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 18:38 (seven years ago) link

gave him a break from sitting crosslegged on a couch telling anthony kiedis he "really likes the energy" of that vocal take

Pull your head on out your hippy haze (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 27 September 2016 19:05 (seven years ago) link

Ever since the redesign (could be coincidence) they've been posting these weird stories occasionally that only exist because they involve, in whatever abstract way, someone with a connection to the music business but don't have much else to do with the actual music or the business.

'Adventure Time' Coming to an End

MarkoP, Thursday, 29 September 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, pursuit of tv clicks is another post-redesign feature, but I was surprised at how they barely attempted to link that one to anything musical

intheblanks, Thursday, 29 September 2016 17:32 (seven years ago) link

the 15+ headlines about Stranger Things were way more annoying than this.

billstevejim, Thursday, 29 September 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

http://pitchfork.com/news/68608-indie-rock-musicians-suck-at-business-communications-new-study-finds/

“You can’t just go in without having some background on how the industry works.”

"go in"

Wimmels, Saturday, 1 October 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link

Yesterday, before the release of Bon Iver’s new album 22, A Million, a series of listening events were held around the world that included the distribution of a special newspaper containing imagery related to the album. On eBay, sellers are auctioning off the newspaper for prices over $1,000.

That may well be, but a search for sold items on eBay puts the top-selling Bon Iver newspaper at a whopping $31.37. Many 'completed' auctions with absurd figures, but--shocker--no bids on those. This is like to me telling you that I've got a collection of fingernail clippings up on eBay for $2,000,000 and you thinking "Gee, people must really love fingernail clippings these days! I better get some before they're all gone!"

I get it: Pitchfork likes the Bon Iver album. But seems like a weird way to generate hype.

Wimmels, Saturday, 1 October 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

i finally heard Bon Iver today. it's generic folk w psych elements.

how is this so huge? i guess networking.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 1 October 2016 16:47 (seven years ago) link

I had to deal with that logic all the time at the record store, trying to quote people's old collections "What do you mean $3? I saw this record going for $300 on the web!"

I would have to explain that it never actually "went for" that. That there is a difference between what people are willing to spend and what people are asking.

xp

Evan, Saturday, 1 October 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

xp

he has a million dollar beard that adds great depth to his muzak

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Saturday, 1 October 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

see also The National, Father John Misty, etc., etc.

chin strokey music benefits from quality facial hair

Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Saturday, 1 October 2016 17:01 (seven years ago) link

I had to deal with that logic all the time at the record store, trying to quote people's old collections "What do you mean $3? I saw this record going for $300 on the web!"

I would have to explain that it never actually "went for" that. That there is a difference between what people are willing to spend and what people are asking.

xp

― Evan, Saturday, October 1, 2016 12:48 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I too have experienced this. Someone cleans out granny's attic and thinks they've struck it rich. "Yes, there are Beatles records worth large sums, but they made a lot of Beatles records, and most of them are not going to sell for enough to buy you that boat you've already picked out."

I partially blame things like Pawn Stars, Storage Wars, Antique Roadshow, etc, for this. Also probably to blame for the fact that it's no longer possible to score a Fender Deuxe at a yard sale for $25. I miss the good old days.

Wimmels, Saturday, 1 October 2016 17:10 (seven years ago) link

is it weird to anyone else that this "news" piece is based on a sponsored post on gizmodo but the pitchfork piece doesn't acknowledge that the original story was sponsored/paid for. they also never link to the actual gizmodo story, which doesn't appear to be on the gizmodo page anymore (probably bc the sponsorship was for a limited time?) but you can still access it here: http://gizmodo.com/watch-two-original-talking-heads-react-to-documentary-n-1786383455.

na (NA), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 13:53 (seven years ago) link

do people think if they keep re-creating Talking Heads and David Lynch everyone will think they are artistic geniuses?

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 15:14 (seven years ago) link

read this fascinating story about a bunch of actors deciding to pretend to be musicians.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 15:16 (seven years ago) link

I kind of hate this, but kind of love this?

Although younger male artists are returning to domestic settings in their music, there are few older male artists questioning how their work impacts upon the families they leave behind. It’s borderline inconceivable that a white, male, 40-something artist could bring a refreshing perspective to a traditional genre, but Taylor’s graceful accountability and invigorating songcraft makes him an anomaly. His own dose of perspective arrives at the end of the plainly gorgeous Heart Like a Levee.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

Like on one hand it's so woke that it's completely removed from reality, but on the other hand it has unlimited potential to completely piss off total dumbasses

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 11 October 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

cold of them to throw Sufjan under the bus like that

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 11 October 2016 17:35 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.