I totally agree except the movie sucked.
― schwantz, Friday, 2 September 2016 16:16 (seven years ago) link
haha well there ya go
― Οὖτις, Friday, 2 September 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link
I admit that by the last big battle sequence I basically didn't give a fuck about the central conflict/threat/whatever of course Kirk was gonna get saved by Bones and Spock duh
― Οὖτις, Friday, 2 September 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link
Just experienced a nerd self-backpat from the picture above: "Ruk!"
― the body of a spider... (scampering alpaca), Friday, 2 September 2016 19:37 (seven years ago) link
I disagree and this movie sucked
― poor fiddy-less albion (darraghmac), Friday, 2 September 2016 19:46 (seven years ago) link
Good post, Shakey.
― Under the Zing of Stan (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 3 September 2016 02:36 (seven years ago) link
"i liked this movie that got me thinking what i like about trek is everything this movie ignored" dumbass
― r|t|c, Saturday, 3 September 2016 14:22 (seven years ago) link
Who are you addressing?
― Under the Zing of Stan (James Redd and the Blecchs), Saturday, 3 September 2016 14:32 (seven years ago) link
Justin Lin
― Neanderthal, Saturday, 3 September 2016 14:33 (seven years ago) link
I was p clear that this movie *did* emphasize what i like about trek - the multiculturalism, space utopias (what else would you call the yorktown? It was basically a mccall painting), the crew/cast's commitment to each other, the humor.
Xp
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 3 September 2016 14:48 (seven years ago) link
yorktown was like they were fighting & chasing inside an escher drawing
but i still dug it
it's very diluted star trek, though for some reason that doesn't bug me as much as it should
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 3 September 2016 17:40 (seven years ago) link
Liked this movie for the most part. I like these characters, but I don't love them like the originals.
The main thing that bugged me was calling the starbase 'Yorktown'. That was the original name for the Enterprise in Roddenberry's proposal to NBC and is mentioned in the show and is assumed to be comparable to Enterprise. They're both named after WWII era carriers. The original ocean-going Yorktown was named after the American Revolutionary War battle. This all made sense in the mid-60s pitching an American show to an American network during the Cold War.
I'm sure Pegg (or whoever) meant it as a nerdy tribute, but calling a stationary base "Yorktown" is very wrong (and something Roddenberry would have never allowed!). Also, it seems like the base is a testament to the cosmopolitan nature of the Federation, so why would it be named after an old earth battle?
Also, it was too big. The recent movies always get the scales wrong. The earth starbase in the TOS films was huge but conceivable. Yorktown is SOOO big.
Finally, why is it "commanded" by a Starfleet admiral? It would seem that millions of people should have an elected governor at least.
― Spencer Chow, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 06:20 (seven years ago) link
because the federation is basically a military dictatorship
― Rob Boss (latebloomer), Wednesday, 14 September 2016 06:36 (seven years ago) link
Speculative revisionism!
― Spencer Chow, Wednesday, 14 September 2016 23:17 (seven years ago) link
Oh dear, this wasn't very good, was it?
― Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 21 October 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link
In the end, I think I preferred the ambitious claptrap of Into Darkness than this cover band greatest hits version of Trek. Anyway - TV show in a couple months, so who cares.
― Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 21 October 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link
This was entirely unmemorable, Karl Urban is starting to piss me off with his almost parodic performance, and they stole the "classical music" joke almost verbatim from Futurama.
― Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 14:45 (seven years ago) link
I have retained very little memory of this movie.
― rhymes with "blondie blast" (cryptosicko), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 14:49 (seven years ago) link
This year's laudable 'enterprise' rocketed past every reheated rehash you've seen before. One of America's most able directors effortlessly applying his artistic legerdemain. Legendary, ostensibly what every enthusiast needed.
― what is the lever disease? (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:11 (seven years ago) link
I very much doubt they're going to do another one of these, and I guess I'm fine with that.
― great Canadian prog-psych debut from 1969 (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 16:13 (seven years ago) link
"classical music" joke was also in a 1965 episode of Doctor Who where they watch the Beatles on a tardis TV.
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Wednesday, 21 December 2016 17:11 (seven years ago) link
I watched this (ST Beyond) last night. It had about enough plot to fill a smallish teacup and the characters had nothing of interest to do, except insofar as being in danger and fighting will seem to be interesting for a while, just because we all have monkey brains. This movie is what the word shite was coined to describe.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Saturday, 22 April 2017 03:35 (seven years ago) link
Are the plot holes big enough to fit a space station? yes!
Are the characters totally basic? yes!
Did I care? nope. I'm probably going to watch it again so I can give it the proper praise it deserves. Justin Lin directing a sci-fi action movie written by Simon Pegg is very much what I hoped it would be.
― El Tomboto, Friday, 22 September 2017 16:14 (six years ago) link
tombot otm
love the 70s-paperback-cover look of this movie
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 22 September 2017 16:17 (six years ago) link
oh I said that upthread before
me otm, i guess
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 22 September 2017 16:19 (six years ago) link
yeah this was totally enjoyable
― Οὖτις, Friday, 22 September 2017 16:20 (six years ago) link
yeah i dug it
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 22 September 2017 16:32 (six years ago) link
I skipped the Khan reboot one, not sure if I prefer this to the first film but it's possible
― Οὖτις, Friday, 22 September 2017 16:32 (six years ago) link
khan reboot was kind of a chore imo
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 22 September 2017 16:35 (six years ago) link
It was trash, the most joyless Trek ever
― nomar, Friday, 22 September 2017 16:47 (six years ago) link
I've never liked Cumberbatch, but once the plot details started to leak I was like wtf no
― Οὖτις, Friday, 22 September 2017 16:48 (six years ago) link
This is definitely my favorite of the three. Veggies OTM re #2. I also think one of the strengths of this one is not leaning so much on the Spork dynamic and letting some of the other characters breathe, as thin as they all may be.
― El Tomboto, Friday, 22 September 2017 21:11 (six years ago) link
Way better than the second movie but still kind of dull, I thought.
Not trying to challops but I think Quinto is *terrible* as Spock. There's too much anger in the character - it's a boring acting choice. I just kind of want the movies to be 2hrs of Kirk.
― Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 22 September 2017 22:50 (six years ago) link
yeah i'm not really a fan of his portrayal, it completely whiffs on the dry, intellectual side of Spock.
the alternate timeline shit is needlessly complicated, too.
― nomar, Friday, 22 September 2017 23:00 (six years ago) link
needlessly complicated or... opportunity for comicsplaining?https://i.imgur.com/PU39xHA.png
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 22 September 2017 23:20 (six years ago) link
crisis on infinite cumberpatch
― Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 22 September 2017 23:23 (six years ago) link
I love #3, and I love #1 ...that Khan nonsense never happened as far as I'm concerned.
I mentioned this upthread but Mr Veg said something I think about a lot w/r/t these movies. He likes the reboots well enough, but he feels like the reboots work overtime to make the look and the tone feel like Star Trek but it bugs him the way they steer clear of any of the depth of content that Rodenberry brought to the series. Like there's no real science or social issues, there's no 'there' there.
I blame JJ Abrams; I've always felt like he just liked the clothes and the spaceships of Star Trek but thought the content was too nerdy
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 23 September 2017 02:36 (six years ago) link
(and I am generally a fan of Abrams)
Agreed on those pts
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 23 September 2017 02:43 (six years ago) link
Abrams is a fan-fiction writer given unlimited studio resources.
― the general theme of STUFF (cryptosicko), Saturday, 23 September 2017 03:37 (six years ago) link
The opposite, I'd have thought? Fan-fiction writers care A LOT.
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 23 September 2017 17:24 (six years ago) link
Like there's no real science or social issues, there's no 'there' there.
Totally - Super 8 the same: all the Spielberg signifiers, none of the depth. Even the TOS and TNG movies, gaudy as they are, are still "about something" while still working as silly sci-if action movies
― Chuck_Tatum, Saturday, 23 September 2017 17:42 (six years ago) link
no way! i loved the kids in Super 8.
― Nhex, Saturday, 23 September 2017 20:23 (six years ago) link
ST Beyond was written by a fan fiction dork, though, which is why it's a fucking blast.
The whole setup to get to the sabotage bit is A++++ trek dialogue for all time, btw, startling from when hears "lassie" say the word bees
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 23 September 2017 21:30 (six years ago) link
... from when Spock hears her say "bees"... derp phone
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 23 September 2017 21:31 (six years ago) link
New series debuts tmrw, btw
― Hit to Death in the "Galactic Head" (kingfish), Saturday, 23 September 2017 22:12 (six years ago) link
yes and Star Trek: The Bryan Fuller TV reboot
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 23 September 2017 22:15 (six years ago) link
Finally watched this, and it's not half-bad (the Spock/McCoy scenes particularly)! The half that is bad pretty much involves the bad aliens, who have a LOT of similarities with the nu-Klingons on Discovery.
― Hava Nagilum (Leee), Sunday, 3 December 2017 02:15 (six years ago) link
It's almost as if they... sabotaged themselves.
― Philip Nunez, Sunday, 3 December 2017 03:09 (six years ago) link