Nathan Barley comes to TV

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1029 of them)
i just look at mark heap and he makes me laugh.

cutty (mcutt), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:05 (nineteen years ago) link

mark heap is so good.

he has been involved in just about everything the past 6 years.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Friday, 4 February 2005 23:51 (nineteen years ago) link

sorry but this looks awful! morris and brooker need to give it a rest. those billboard ads are all over leeds and are totally shit. theres no way this could be funny, to me it just seems like a coupel fo people who used to b edgy and shit, but now therye an embarrassment. its like my dad havign a laugh by saying things like "this is *cool"" or something , shit phrases like "well weapon". i fell sort of mebarrassed for chris morris whenever i see those ads.

tvgohome was intensely vitriolic, but i al ways felt it was the bitter anger of just some old guys who werent really in touch anymore, but just took it out on a bunch of idiots. the "cunt" bits of tvgh were the least funny anyway.

ambrose (ambrose), Saturday, 5 February 2005 01:05 (nineteen years ago) link

i dont wnat people to get the impression that i am siding with boorman though, he is an utter imbecile for exmaple:

"it became difficult to distinguish between genuine creatives and opportunistic charlatans."

oh yeah real creatives theres a ton of them about, many of them with the surname Boorman, eh neil?

"Why the real players in youth culture are never drafted in to help is a mystery"

hahahaha WTF you mean, like, kids? oh no, you mean NB and a bunch of failures from sleaze. theyre the real players in youth culture.

that article is pathetic

ambrose (ambrose), Saturday, 5 February 2005 01:08 (nineteen years ago) link

1) Who'll turn up in the series first: Kevin Eldon or Mark Heap?


from the stills gallery: is this kevin eldon?

http://www.trashbat.co.ck/images/barley/gallery/programme_stills/still_5.jpg


if it is, then my bet's on him.

Slump Man (Slump Man), Saturday, 5 February 2005 01:28 (nineteen years ago) link

The bottom crashed out of the internet, fashion and magazine publishing. A downturn that the area has since struggled to claw itself out of.

I hate to be a hata, but HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

-- Markelby

Hata.

Anna (Anna), Saturday, 5 February 2005 13:02 (nineteen years ago) link

i used to be round Chris' office when this was in early development but i didn't want to have much to do with it. didn't see the point of poking fun at shoreditch

nick.K (nick.K), Saturday, 5 February 2005 23:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Hi Nick!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 6 February 2005 06:48 (nineteen years ago) link

I was in the pub yesterday reading the papers (note build-up of excuse for next statement) and the Daily Mail TV guide said that this would be much better if it were Rik Mayall and Dylan Moran in it instead.

I haven't seen even a trailer for the show, but I imagine this idea of casting to be the truth.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 6 February 2005 20:08 (nineteen years ago) link

More clips and a critical discussion of the show on the current edition of Newsnight Review (the arts review show desperate enough to ask me to screentest as a critic at the end of last year)!

Momus (Momus), Monday, 7 February 2005 07:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Rik Mayall and Dylan Moran? Yes, everyone knows that Nathan Barley is either pushing 50 and/or Irish?!?!?

Miles Finch, Monday, 7 February 2005 09:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I got asked to screentest for Newsnight Review as well. I told them that I didn't fancy going on TV but if they could get Ian McShane to portray me I would write the script and he could act it out. They didn't seem too keen on that idea.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 7 February 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Did they say "can't we ask Ken Stott instead?"

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 7 February 2005 12:07 (nineteen years ago) link

They didn't know what I looked like and I wanted to escape the Stottesque straitjacket.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 7 February 2005 12:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I must say I feel a bit left out, not having been asked, but there we are. They really do need to find some better women panellists -- it's basically just Greer and the unspeakable Julie Myerson.

Miles Finch, Monday, 7 February 2005 12:11 (nineteen years ago) link

There's also the other Greer and occasionally you get Allison Pearson or Deborah Bull or Natasha Walter and none of them is any good and they're all of a certain (stereo)type. Would like to see Kathy Burke on there but presumably they can't afford her any more.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 7 February 2005 12:17 (nineteen years ago) link

they occasionally have miranda sawyer on, too. i would like to go on newsnight review, just so as i can leap up in the middle of the programme and belt the living shit out of tom paulin, entirely unprovoked.

stelfox, Monday, 7 February 2005 12:38 (nineteen years ago) link

miranda sawyer is becoming a bigger disappointment to me by the day, especially since she started writing for the daily mail.

stelfox, Monday, 7 February 2005 12:39 (nineteen years ago) link

what's paulin done to you, dave? sawyer is, has always been, bullshit.

Miles Finch, Monday, 7 February 2005 12:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Miranda Sawyer writes for the Daily Mail?! What, is she the new Linda Lee Potter?

stew, Monday, 7 February 2005 12:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Paulin's voice is vv irritating.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 7 February 2005 12:44 (nineteen years ago) link

i said unprovoked.

stelfox, Monday, 7 February 2005 12:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Rik Mayall and Dylan Moran? Yes, everyone knows that Nathan Barley is either pushing 50 and/or Irish?!?!?

I think the Daily Mail thing was suggesting that a young Rik Mayall (bear in mind this is the Daily Mail and they aren't quite au fait with the current times) could be the stereotypical obnoxious arsehole, and that Dylan Moran has the cynical world-weariness to play Dan Ashcroft.

Anyway, I am not defending the daily mail, but, as you were...

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 7 February 2005 21:39 (nineteen years ago) link

50 minutes to go. Cookd and Bombd are shania on the whole thing: http://chilled.cream.org/forums/portal.php

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 11 February 2005 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah so that was okay

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:29 (nineteen years ago) link

that was cock muff and bumhole.

Frogman Henry, Friday, 11 February 2005 22:34 (nineteen years ago) link

hmm seemed a bit of a misfire to me. the nathan barley charater/actor was completely unconvincing. i like the guy who plays dan ashcroft though.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:36 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah funny in places.

I didn't realise, not having read (read?) 'shoreditch twat', that morris had spawned a band of this kind of neologistic followers but I got the broad generalities.

cozen (Cozen), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I wanted it to not be, but it was the rub. 3 years too late.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:38 (nineteen years ago) link

i quite liked it, i don't fully understand the Dan Ashcroft character tho - WHY is he like this/WHY is he there?/WHY does he tolerate it all? just for OUR amusement?


the nathan barley charater/actor was completely unconvincing

he seemed pretty much in keeping with the TVGH character

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:39 (nineteen years ago) link

i quite liked it, i don't fully understand the Dan Ashcroft character tho - WHY is he like this/WHY is he there?/WHY does he tolerate it all? just for OUR amusement?

I think the point of the character was "Hi, I'm popular TV critic Charlie Brooker, and man do I meet some foolish people in my ever-so-rivetting life".

That wasn't even Chris Morris' "Max And Paddy". It was Chris Morris' Tony Ferrino.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:42 (nineteen years ago) link

He was a cunt, certainly.

(xpost)

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:43 (nineteen years ago) link

it was quite funny in places though relied on a lot of the things morris has always relied on. ('that was totally jackson!')

cozen (Cozen), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Overall, I quite liked it. The over-the-top cartoonishness of some parts - the tiny bikes and so on, for example - was a bit annoying, though. And, Dom's right, the Dan Ashcroft magazine article could have come straight out of a Brooker TV review. It might not be Morris' best thing ever, but compared to the rest of what's on the telly it still stands up.

caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago) link

i thought the tiny bikes were great - i like the surreal bent of it all.

the scene with the Weekend On Sunday editor...maybe lacking the poise of The office but reminded me of it a lot

i liked it when he joined in 'cock muff bumhole' at the end too, the sense of hopelessness and resignation was well captured.

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Friday, 11 February 2005 22:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Wasn't that great was it? Some nice ideas and amusing details, but nothing laugh out loud. And the Brent comparisons were hard to avoid. Didn't really make you cringe the way the Office did.
Best gag: the Weekend on Sunday cover, "Tom Paulin: Haunted By Humour"
Not a disaster, but a little disappointing nonetheless. Hope it picks up...

stew, Friday, 11 February 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago) link

For people outside the Greater London area, I'm really not sure how much they'll be familiar with the stereotype being satiriset. You might watch and say 'well, there's a lot of idiots. And the point is?'

They humour is that they're idiots. We are supposed to identify with the Ashcrofts here. But seriously, I don't really, to be honest. The real bite would have been the rage of 'AND THESE FUCKHEADS ACTUALLY EXIST AND GET PAID AND ARE UTTER CUNTS' but actually, they're all on the dole because their dotcoms crashed and it's all a huge case of missing your moment. The TVGH show should have been this. The time was right then.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 11 February 2005 23:06 (nineteen years ago) link

No. Unfortunately I still know of a couple of dot.com cunts and they never get sacked or go on the dole because - literally - their fathers or boyfriends finance their 'jobs' and 'companies'.

Clapham seems to be a major gathering place for these people now, though.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Friday, 11 February 2005 23:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Best gag: the Weekend on Sunday cover, "Tom Paulin: Haunted By Humour"

Well, only in the way the best lyrics are the ones we mishear and turn out to have made up ourselves. The headline was actually "Tom Paulin: Haunted By Rumour". Which I think is funnier.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:02 (nineteen years ago) link

(Being in Japan, of course, I didn't see this. I've just been devouring the press about it because I'm fascinated that the life I knew in Clerkenwell in 1997 would be satirized in 2005. Did it have "drum'n'bass subtitles"? And has anyone told Analord?)

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Was it a good or bad thing that i recognised/like most of the soundtrack songs e.g prefuse 73, DM + jemini.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Are you sure? Maybe I need to adjust the contrast on my tv or get my specs checked. Your version is funnier, true.
Having had the dubious pleasure of meeting the man I can say that the Nicky Campbell headline was OTM.

stew, Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:09 (nineteen years ago) link

We are supposed to identify with the Ashcrofts here.

i'm not sure - i thought so at first but it soon became clear that he was a pitiful character, somewhere between David Brent and Tim for me. actually that's me in a nutshell, maybe. ack.

the timing thing isn't so relevant for me because of this 'nostalgia' aspect mentioned upthread, plus the humour relying a great deal on just the absurd exaggeration of it all. i can enjoy it whilst thinking back to my own experiences as a numeeja design underling and personal hatred/envy conflicts re Hoxditch hype.

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:09 (nineteen years ago) link

i chuckled out loud several times too i must say

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:10 (nineteen years ago) link

goodness I forgot abt DM & jemini!

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:23 (nineteen years ago) link

It was pretty good - not great - and there's plenty of scope for plot and character development which Morris simply hasn't done before cos he's never done a sitcom. If Green Wing can turn itself into something actually worth watching by the end of its run, then this is certainly starting from a better place.

I'm bored to the back teeth of the SOTCAA/NotBBC/Cook'd and Bomb'd crowd - those forums were always like the most soul-sapping aspects of ILX and it's no surprise that they loathe this. Imagine an ILM where all the threads were about much worse everything is getting and how even the bands we liked have lost it. Oh, wait...

Morris is stuck with being lorded as the undisputed heavyweight comic genius of our time so if he turns something out that's slightly to the left of the money, or three-fifths as good as Peep Show or whatever, it's a calamity and a Slade musical written with Richard Stilgoe can only be round the corner.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd like to award that comment an OTM, please.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:45 (nineteen years ago) link

But this was, mainly, shit. I didn't realise Barley was just supposed to be a ridiculously caracatured moron. It would have been nice to have some (ANY!) subtlety in there. And the wedged-in Morrisspeak by numbers seemed boring and out of place. Julian Barratt was pretty good, though.

Ally C (Ally C), Saturday, 12 February 2005 02:50 (nineteen years ago) link

The trailer for episode 2 has just gone up... shades of 'Life of Brian', with Dan Ashcroft being hailed by various pantomime wiggas and nazis as 'the preacher man' and getting very angry about it. He's 'the preacher man' because his article about The Idiots (the very people running the article) has 'slaughtered the pig of ignorance' (said with a rising intonation). I snorted like a pig watching it! Fuck, I wish UK Nova were accepting new members!

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Okay, thanks to a kind filesharer I just saw the first episode. I thought it was good. Barley was made a lot more unsympathetic than I thought he would be, but wasn't the central character. Dan Ashcroft was, and his plight, trapped in a world he's too old (and too intelligent) for was surprisingly moving. You actually felt for him as he beat against the glass ceiling of his little world. Weirdly enough, something about him reminded me of John Peel, also too old and too dignified for a metropolitan media set who deified him, also trapped under some kind of glass ceiling. Except that Peel loved what he played, whereas Ashcroft (hmm, Ashcroft / Ravenscroft?) hates it, yet can't transcend it.

The reviewers who've said it gets uncomfortably close to The Office are right; it's The Office transplanted to a loft where The Play Ethic has gone mad. But I think that's okay; The Office was simply the precursor of a new school of 'embarrassment comedy', and Morris and Brooker are big enough not to stand in its shadow. What's good about this embarrassment comedy thing is that it really makes you feel with the characters. That keeps it from being a Vanity Fair or Rake's Progress or Beggar's Opera-style ensemble piece, just a parade of unsympathetic fops and bullies.

And I have to say I was snorting with embarrassed laughter at scenes like the one where Nathan goes into an Asian newsagent and calls the owner 'my nigga'. Horrific, yes. Over the top, well, not really; I know people who would almost do that.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 12 February 2005 08:18 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.