Star Trek: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3720 of them)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DdH1WjHiB0

Spencer Chow, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 22:12 (seven years ago) link

We got 4 free passes to the latest movie, is it worth going to see? I saw the first of the new reboots recently and it wasnt so bad.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 22:48 (seven years ago) link

wait until it comes out before asking?

(also Simon Pegg wrote it so I'd have thought that would be enough for you)

Shakey δσς (sic), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

LOL not necessarily :) Last film I saw him in absolutely woofed (tho I dont know if he wrote it)

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 23:27 (seven years ago) link

This one looks like an extended TOS episode, which appeals to me

reggae mike love (polyphonic), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 23:30 (seven years ago) link

I have low expectations based on director and general state of franchise, but a glimmer of hope because of Pegg and his clear understanding of what makes Trek special

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 23:32 (seven years ago) link

He was good in the first one.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 00:20 (seven years ago) link

(tho I dont know if he wrote it)

The only films he's co-written apart from the Edgar Wright ones are Run Fatboy Run and Paul.

Shakey δσς (sic), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 01:24 (seven years ago) link

Wasnt either of those. It was some dreadful aus cop/thriller.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 01:30 (seven years ago) link

Hot Fuzz?

Nicholas Nickelback (Leee), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 02:05 (seven years ago) link

Not strictly Australian, but one can see how you'd make that mistake

Shakey δσς (sic), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 02:20 (seven years ago) link

It was Kill me Three times. Anyway, sorry to get off topic!

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 03:36 (seven years ago) link

four weeks pass...

so it's set *before* TOS and features "a male Klingon captain"?

ooookay

Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 August 2016 22:28 (seven years ago) link

only a dealbreaker if he's got the forehead ridges

le Histoire du Edgy Miley (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 11 August 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

I'm surprised they're going pre-Enterprise. That seems like it risks repeating the failure of Enterprise again. I'd much rather something post-Voyager. There's plenty of future left to cover, no need to be doubling back all the time.

jmm, Thursday, 11 August 2016 22:44 (seven years ago) link

I'm just happy it won't be in the Abrams stupidverse.

Jeff, Thursday, 11 August 2016 22:45 (seven years ago) link

Oh, I misread the article. It's not 10 years before Enterprise, it's 10 years before TOS.

jmm, Thursday, 11 August 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

I still agree w you about post-Voyager being better - don't like the prospect of more Easter Eggs in a pre-TOS show (ooh there's Sarek or T'Pol or Mudd or whoever)

Οὖτις, Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:02 (seven years ago) link

10 years pre-TOS probably means Battlestar: Garth of Izar

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:06 (seven years ago) link

TNG-era Trek is the real Trek to me, but still, shit, this is Trek on TV (or thereabouts) and not in the Abramsverse and that is totally excites

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:14 (seven years ago) link

It'd be funny if they make the sets, special effects, makeup, etc really cheesy since it's pre-TOS.

nickn, Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

It should be in black and white

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 11 August 2016 23:52 (seven years ago) link

yeah i'm surprised at their insistence at relating everything new they make these days to TOS when TNG might be more definitive for most of the audience

ciderpress, Friday, 12 August 2016 00:00 (seven years ago) link

damn old-timers

Nhex, Friday, 12 August 2016 00:57 (seven years ago) link

This is why you must vote in my poll! MAKE IT POLL: ILX Star Trek nominations thread at last! VOTING ENDS 2016/09/09

write sed fread (Leee), Friday, 12 August 2016 00:59 (seven years ago) link

i certainly will, gotta offset the TOS-only voters

ciderpress, Friday, 12 August 2016 01:00 (seven years ago) link

"yeah i'm surprised at their insistence at relating everything new they make these days to TOS when TNG might be more definitive for most of the audience"

exactly, plus, it's not like we're likely to get any more TNG movies so why not give that cast a chance to do a cameo or two again?

akm, Friday, 12 August 2016 01:43 (seven years ago) link

data lives!
http://i.imgur.com/9wK6hrG.png

Philip Nunez, Friday, 12 August 2016 02:15 (seven years ago) link

Isn't this a different story every season? Maybe season 2 will be Old Worf or something.

Chuck_Tatum, Friday, 12 August 2016 08:58 (seven years ago) link

There's a lot to like about that different story every season idea. Except that season one of TNG, VOY, DS9 and ENT all kind of sucked...

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Friday, 12 August 2016 15:04 (seven years ago) link

tl,dr the short answer is because the original series is iconic, popular, and highly valuable piece of intel prop

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

like more valuable, recognizable, famous w broader appeal than any other ST property

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 18:07 (seven years ago) link

TNG had some bizarrely robust restraint in keeping the TOS nostalgia in check for a while. If it were made today, they'd be putting Kirk's brain into the main computer as some kind of AI sidekick that makes sarcastic quips at Picard while he pilots some dune buggy with his drinking buddy Scotty.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 18:16 (seven years ago) link

the DS9 tribbles ep is the only good TOS throwback

ciderpress, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 18:56 (seven years ago) link

There are some minor good ones like that TNG episode where "time becomes a loop" when it turns out to be Captain Frasier Crane, which was a ship from the 'movie' era of the original series.

Sarek and Spock's episodes of TNG were pretty good too. I guess that isn't a throwback more than having them as guest stars.

I really don't get why they didn't go with a TNG sequel myself. Having Picard as a ambassador and some of the other cast as Star Fleet big wig guest stars could be cool if done well.

earlnash, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 04:12 (seven years ago) link

If it were made today, they'd be putting Kirk's brain into the main computer as some kind of AI sidekick that makes sarcastic quips at Picard while he pilots some dune buggy with his drinking buddy Scotty.

I remember examining a Trek novel once that sounded pretty much like this. It was the most bonkers version of Trek I could have fathomed. Luke Skywalker may have made an appearance.

great Canadian prog-psych debut from 1969 (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 05:48 (seven years ago) link

This is...an odd sentence that I didn't expect Annalee to write:

This period also offers narrative comfort food for fans, reminding them of the "good old days" of the show before everybody got so uptight about the Prime Directive and started worrying about post-colonial politics on Bajor and other developing worlds.

uh...wasn't this like half the point of TNG/DS9, and what led to the quality of those shows? Figuring out ethics and morality when encountering strange new shit? And that an explicitly stated desire to return to some actiony TOS that led to Enterprise?

Sentient animated cat gif (kingfish), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 06:52 (seven years ago) link

well put

Nhex, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 06:56 (seven years ago) link

Regardless of what this new Trek is like, I've just resigned myself that there is never going to be a more utopian scifi TV show ever again. Just the same rehashing of the ragtag bunch, on a decrepit ship, cowboying it throughout the galaxy in a dystopian universe.

Jeff, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 08:40 (seven years ago) link

TNG: too good for this world

great Canadian prog-psych debut from 1969 (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 14:54 (seven years ago) link

lol the Enterprise tv show was both past and future because instead of just skirting around the prime directive for plot devices they leaned heavily on THE TEMPORAL PRIME DIRECTIVE

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:01 (seven years ago) link

imo the last season of Enterprise was better because the really weird, heavy-handed directions on what they could and couldn't do were finally weakened

they wasted most of the show's run on some temporal cold war thing that was hot garbage

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:03 (seven years ago) link

Weird when Mass Effect becomes the thing more Star Trek than actual Star Trek, as it were. Do the studio heads(and some fans, it seems) just want Battlestar in a Starfleet uniform?

Hell, the reboot movies were Star Wars flicks on a Federation starship, but I always attributed that to Abrams _really_ wanting to do SW and grabbing any genre funding to do so.

Sentient animated cat gif (kingfish), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:17 (seven years ago) link

On original broadcast, Enterprise lost me after about 3 episodes and I never went back.

Watching the whole thing last year finally, I have to say I enjoyed most of it way more than I thought I would.

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

Series finale was made of human shit though

I wish you could see my home. It's... it's so... exciting (Jon not Jon), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:23 (seven years ago) link

lol yeah

mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

pretty much all the trek series besides TOS took until season 4 to really hit their stride, i dunno why this kept repeating but enterprise didn't get a chance to keep going like the other 3

ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:34 (seven years ago) link

There's loads of good stuff in S2-3 of TNG!

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.