Jeremy Corbyn vs Angela Eagle

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1428 of them)

If there is a snap election I'd be very surprised if Labour win, but I genuinely think there is a much higher chance of doing so under Corbyn than Eagle cos at least it's proven that a significant proportion of the electorate actually like him. And if they lose, I'd much rather the Corbynistas in opposition than the Blairites. So a no brainer really.

chap, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:06 (seven years ago) link

Though whether an election loss under Jezza would lead to the hard left retaining any kind of influence on the party is questionable, I guess. Either way, we don't have much to lose so we may as well go with our principles at this point.

chap, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:08 (seven years ago) link

ty for that link NV, i missed it on the other thread

the hallouminati (lex pretend), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 11:24 (seven years ago) link

yes that gilbert article is great

ogmor, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:00 (seven years ago) link

The thousands of #keepcorbyn comments on Eagle's facebook page!

saer, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:20 (seven years ago) link

photos of the window of angela eagle's office boarded up with vote remain placards :*(

conrad, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 12:29 (seven years ago) link

how Frank Field was involved in undermining the hard-left Labour candidate Lol Duffy in '87 (I remember the local freesheet going to town on the "Marxist")

Marxist was accurate in Duffy's case though, he was a member/"supporter" of the trot group that became Alliance for Workers' Liberty (who seem to have been the only far-left party to have supported a Remain vote this year afaict)

soref, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 14:46 (seven years ago) link

17-15 win for the second vote on whether Corbyn should be on the ballot to be secret.

It's being taken as a strong indication they'll keep him off it.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 15:19 (seven years ago) link

Then it will look like an enormous stitch-up, and whoever gets in will face an immediate and ongoing crisis of legitimacy.

If they keep Corbyn off the ballot expect everyone to bundle in and Angela Eagle to be nowhere in the final voting.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 15:23 (seven years ago) link

and the number of votes to plummet

conrad, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:12 (seven years ago) link

if they do try to keep him off the ballot then I can only imagine it will be a disaster, even from the pov of the Labour right. the pressure to reverse the decision will be immense, Corbyn's stand against the corrupt establishment will become the one and only issue of the whole leadership election campaign, and any discussion of his failings as leader will be off the agenda. I can't see any way that this would work out well for his opponents - I guess they hope they can tough it out and Corbyn's supporters will just leave the party in frustration?

soref, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:21 (seven years ago) link

they can't keep him off the ballot, he'll just have to be 51'ed on to it like everyone else. same difference really but

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:24 (seven years ago) link

to think of all the unheeded warnings that scottish labours' intimate intwinement in the better together campaign could alienate their voters for good

conrad, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:26 (seven years ago) link

It's nice that the Labour Party are finally working together to save Britain from a grave and terrible threat

Blandford Forum, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:37 (seven years ago) link

Who would have guessed the threat would be a guy who cares about justice and welfare for poor people but isn't that great at working the media! I never would have, lucky I'm not an MP!! :)

Blandford Forum, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

I mean I can imagine a situation where they force Corbyn to get the noms and enough no-confidence PLP voters are self-aware enough to realise what a fuckup it'd be to keep him out, so they nominate him anyway. It'd only need 11 out of 140ish right?

JimD, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

172 in fact

JimD, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

he needs 51 nominations from either Lab MPs or MEPs, and afaict there are only about a dozen or so who actually want him to be leader. but yes, I think that he could well end up getting enough nominations anyway due to the pressure on MPs from their local parties, fear of splitting the party and recognition that a leader elected without Corbyn on the ballot would be seen as lacking legitimacy.

soref, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:48 (seven years ago) link

A few commenters here in need of a bracing fiery death

https://twitter.com/GuardianHeather/status/752902183012753408

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

i'm not too sure that there's any point expecting honour or basic political intelligence from these fuckers tbh

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

real somewhere that the number of nominations needed for a leadership contest where there is no incumbent is only 15% of the PLP and MEPs, rather than the 20% needed when the election is a challenge against an incumbent leader, so theoretically Corbyn could stand down as leader and then would need fewer nominations. which seems farcical, but is in keeping with the general slapstick nature of the last few weeks

soref, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

A few commenters here in need of a bracing fiery death

Starting with all these cunts going on about "new, kinder politics" all the fucking time

Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:09 (seven years ago) link

Is there any possibility that Eagle is targeting herself as some kind of machiavellian move that seems a little too obvious.
Playing the victim does seem one tactic, but does is it one electable?

Stevolende, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:12 (seven years ago) link

doubt it, there's enough understandably enraged people, ne'er-do-wells and idiots to go around

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:16 (seven years ago) link

xp top tip - when a female public figure is claiming harassment, the burden of proof is really really far on the side of those claiming she's making it up.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

omg

https://twitter.com/MichaelLCrick/status/752915337939718144

soref, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link

young passionate supporter of neolib economics

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:31 (seven years ago) link

Wonder if the rallies Angela has will bring the same numbers in as Jeremy's short notice meetings did?

Stevolende, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:45 (seven years ago) link

ppl suggesting that the Corbyn lookalike thing is a set up, I was hoping that it was just some hapless bearded gentleman who happened to walk past and had no idea was going on

soref, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:51 (seven years ago) link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CnLkyboWAAAAtfb.jpg

soref, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:55 (seven years ago) link

The Jamie Vardy lookalike is on the phone now giving him tips.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:03 (seven years ago) link

The Vardy lookalike has been getting abuse since Norwexit

lilcraigyboi (Craigo Boingo), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:31 (seven years ago) link

Corbyn on the ballot!

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:54 (seven years ago) link

poor Angela Eagle

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

So does that mean that Eagle is going to go by what she said earlier?
THough i have just heard that Owen Smith is also on. So not sure what that will mean.

Stevolende, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:58 (seven years ago) link

I mean it's despicable that this was even in question enough that people should have to feel relieved about this outcome but

hahahaha

Dadjokke (Sgt. Biscuits), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:59 (seven years ago) link

My guess is there'll be loads of them on the ballot paper and they'll all get out of the way for whoever ends up polling get closest to Corbyn.

Or they could all dumbly run up against each other and split the vote again, who even knows.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:03 (seven years ago) link

Can't actually remember the last time I heard some good news in politics, but otoh what a bag of arses they all look

coygbiv (NickB), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:04 (seven years ago) link

stoked for the Dan Jarvis campaign where the leaflets just have the words "army man" in different fonts and sizes at random intervals

Dadjokke (Sgt. Biscuits), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:12 (seven years ago) link

"It's a man's life in the Parliamentary Labour Party."

PLPeni (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

I paid a pound

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:16 (seven years ago) link

Their next cunning plan will be to borrow a few million off Murdoch and pay a click farm to give Eagle 200000 fake Labour members :p

As much as I immensely dislike what the likes of Eagle represent and how they conduct themselves, I do almost genuinely feel sorry for her now.

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:34 (seven years ago) link

Nobody who registered in the last six months will be allowed to vote, according to the BBC - so whatever recruitment push Saving Labour were going for clearly didn't work. It's also being reported that the £3 registered supporters need to pay £25 to vote this time.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:55 (seven years ago) link

fucking ponzi scheme!

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:57 (seven years ago) link

I'd pay the £25, but ffs!

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 19:59 (seven years ago) link

Seems bizarre that you can't vote if you became a member five months ago but can if you register to pay £25 as a non-member in the two-day window they're opening up.

On a Raqqa tip (ShariVari), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:01 (seven years ago) link

I want my pound back

O, Barack: flaws (wins), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:02 (seven years ago) link

people who joined since Feb would be able to vote if they pay the £25 supporter fee, I guess? it does seem silly

soref, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:04 (seven years ago) link

It seems like they do actually have a plan after all.

calzino, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:05 (seven years ago) link

He's going to walk it.

AlanSmithee, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 20:06 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.